MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds and Ends: Royals, Cashman, Tavarez | Main | Mayo Draft Mania »

Mets Shopping Aaron Heilman?

Adam Rubin of the New York Daily News is hearing buzz from scouts that the Mets are shopping 29 year-old reliever Aaron Heilman.  Heilman has a career best strikeout rate in 22.2 innings, but everything else has gone haywire (control, home runs and hits allowed).

Rubin says the Mets are looking for a setup man in return.  It seems that the best fit would be with a noncontending team that would switch Heilman back to starting.  The Nationals (Jon Rauch), Reds (David Weathers), and Pirates (Damaso Marte, John Grabow) might have decent relievers available.  Not sure if they'd have interest in Heilman, though.

Heilman will be arbitration-eligible in 2009 and 2010 and will reach free agency after that.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5526a35968834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets Shopping Aaron Heilman?:

Comments

Joaquin Benoit from the Rangers, but not sure either club would be too thrilled with that deal right now.

Howry for Heilman - Cubs get the benefit of two years of cheap Heilman, Mets get proven relief pitcher who could really use change of scenery, draft picks when he leaves and he does tend to improve as the year goes on.

The Heilman ship has sailed. He was overhyped, though good. Now, he's still getting more credit than he deserves, though he's not good. Rauch, for instance, is worth much more than Heilman. The idea that Heilman should be a starter is a questionable one. Heilman's always thought so, but the Mets haven't apparently thought much of the idea. I know, I know, he was "indispensable" in the bullpen. But that was a long time ago.

Heilman for Howry, I don't get it. Why does Howry need a change of scenery? Because he's struggling? He struggles every year at the beginning of the year, as you correctly pointed out. What does Heilman offer the Cubs that Howry doesn't? He's cheap? Big deal, the Cubs have plenty of $. Heilman could start? Tell that too the Mets, afaik it's been said that he needs another descent pitch before he'll be taken seriously as a starter. He's had plenty of time and still hasn't started so I'm guessing he'll never be a good starter in the majors.

Plus as you pointed out draft picks will be coming to the team that lets Howry walk at the end of the season. Not to mention the fact that it's about the point in the season when Howry starts to heat up and get good. Why would the Cubs trade that away? Sorry, Heilman for Howry would be a bad trade for the Cubs.

Heilman for howry would be bad for the cubs? Are you serious? Mets fans tend to overvalue heilman, but that assesment of howry is ridiculous.

It seems like Heilman should have been a free agent years ago. He seems to have been a Met forever but his service time is going on forever. The thing that confuses me with regard to Heilman and how the Mets handle him is, they just seem so against letting him start, and they always say it is because he is a 2 pitch guy. My question is, how come they payed Santana 140 mil for his 2 pitches? I know he has a slider, but he has maybe used it 10 times all year. Why do the let Pelfrey keep starting? He may have a changeup and slider, but they are both pretty bad pitches right now. How about Maine? He was a Mets starter for a year and a half using pretty much only his fastball before he developed a change and a slider (again, neither of these pitches has any consistency yet), and last but not least, Oliver Perez, who throws a slider and a fastball. Heilman has hown he is a workhorse, he never is hurt, and he will always take the ball. Willie is constantly complaining that his pitchers need to go deeper into games. It couldnt hurt to give Heilman a shot, and if nothing else, maybe increase his trade value.

Heilman and Howry are both good relievers who are struggling now. Heilman has been really good for the last 3 years for the Mets. He will turn it around. Plus people are ready to turn to Duaner Sanchez who hasn't evenproved he can get oputs regularly since coming back from surgery. Heilman can go out and throw everynight, something you cant say about any of the other Mets relievers. Every single thing Pageian said aboutHowry is also true about Heilman. They have been similar guys for the last 3 years.

I understand that you don't think Howry is very valuable, but you have to realize that he has been one of the better setup men in the game over the last 4+ years. He is a type A free Agent as of right now, and probably will be by the end of the year. So not only is he a terrific verteran relief pitcher who can still throw 94, he also comes with two draft picks at the end of the year, which is very valuable in and of itself. I think that the Cubs have more value with Howry + picks than the Mets do with a failed starter who really isn't that great of a reliever, or they wouldn't be shopping him in the first place.

To clarify, I'm not saying Heilman is by any means bad, or worthless. I would think with his upside and salary, he is probably worth around a Howry...but with the type A status you get with Howry, I think he is more valuable. Especially considering the cubs really need some depth in their minor league system, and have a chance to get it in the next two drafts. Giving away Howry is giving away a very good bullpen arm with a track record AND two high draft picks, which I don't think they would want to do unless it was packaged with others to bring back a true need.

Dunc, you can also say Heilman has been one of the better setup men in the last 3 years. Its not that I dont like Howry. I do. I wouldn't love or hate this trade, I think it is fairly even. But calling Heilman a failed starter isn't really fair. He has had all of 25 big league starts. Also, upon reaching the majors the Mets changed Heilmans arm angle, which he changed back to his old style in before he went back into the bullpen. I also dont really believe they are shopping Heilman. I dont really believe anything Adam Rubin says. I am not saying they wouldn't trade him if they felt they got a good deal, but I dont think they are looking to get rid of him. He has been their most reliable reliever/ workhorse out of the pen for 3 years now. 6 bad weeks shouldnt really render him worthless yet.

Nrmax,

I have to wonder whether he is being shopped as well. Why would they be asking for a set up man for a guy that for the last two years, has been a pretty good reliever himself? If it weren't for the draft picks that came along with Howry, I would say that Hendry should go ahead and make the move, because he is kind of like a younger version as far as the numbers go, and he is obviously cheaper. However, like I said, I think the Cubs need those picks.

So, if the guy's point is that they want a setup man for him, I'm with you, I think he is full of it and they aren't shopping him at all.

I understand you point about the draft picks Adunc and it makes sense to hold on to them but cubs are looking at Howry, wood, lieber, and eyre all being free agents next yr ( not to mention dempster). I would sacrifice 2 picks that won't help until 5 yrs from now to plug one of those holes with a proven cheap middle reliever for 2 yrs. Heilmann is slumping but I think is he still s decent setup man and would be more comfortable with him in the pen in 09 and 10 than an unproven. But its not the end of the world if we don't make the swap - happy with howry. Would mets take eyre and Marquis for Heilman? lol

There are no draft picks that come with Howry! That decision isn't made until after the season. He might be a Type A, or a Type B, or a Type C, or, he might not merit any compensation.

Fans always overvalue their own players but to assume that Howry will merit "two high draft picks" just isn't accurate right now. The determinations for compensation are not always rational (Carlos Silva was a no comp for example)and are never based on fans loyalty to players.

The Mets seem like they're always shopping Heilman, like they just can't wait to get rid of him.

As for the comparison to Howry, Howry seems a little better historically, but he's older and likely declining. They're both good for a 4.50 ERA this year with plenty of IP.

Dodgers starters have been disappointing so far, while the bullpen has been solid. Could see them trying to flip Proctor over to the Mets for Heilman.

My question is, how come they payed Santana 140 mil for his 2 pitches? Yeah!.. That it.. Santana is a 2 Pitch Pitcher.. Okay..

"He might be a Type A, or a Type B, or a Type C, or, he might not merit any compensation."

There is no C any more, so he won't be that.

Obviously we don't know, but before the season started, he was a Type A. Now, we know they are measured by the last two years, so his 07 numbers will stand. he had a very good ERA with a ton of Innings pitched, so he is going to be at least a type B. If he becomes the second half pitcher that he is known for being, he will probably be a type A, which is what I've been saying.

Obviously we don't know, but if you go by the guys record over his last 5 years or so, he is a second half pitcher that should be just fine and will obtain this type A status. To say that is not by any means, a stretch.

"My question is, how come they payed Santana 140 mil for his 2 pitches? Yeah!.. That it.. Santana is a 2 Pitch Pitcher.. Okay.. "

Way to take it out of context. Nice. I was just trying to make a point that you can succeed as a starter with 2 good pitches. Santana is doing it right now. He almost never even throws the slider. Bonatom, how many sliders has Santana throw this year? I bet you it is around 2 or 3 in each start. Fastballs and Changeups. I remember him using the slider a few times against the Phils but thats pretty much it. My point was that the Mets tell Heilman he cant start because of his 2 pitches when none of their starters with the exception of Pedro really throw more then 2 pitches.

Either way, you completely missed the point of my post. You should be proud.

If Aaron Heilman was as good a "two-pitch pitcher" as Johan Santana, he'd be starting. :)

Thats alright, Howry throws his fastball like 95% of the time, I swear. It actually worries me at some points, because he almost never seems to throw a breaking ball. There have been more lately...but its crazy. When he is on, like late last summer, he just goes at hitters with the fastball and most of them are in the zone. I would say he has what you call a "heavy ball".

Anyway, you can be successful with only having a pitch or two, as long as you can locate it. The fact that Heilman is a two pitch pitcher doesn't worry me, as long as he can throw them where he wants to.

The Mets need to acquire a starting pitcher. Considering Pedro might retire at the end of the season, there is very little motivation for him to come back this season. Pelfrey has proven that he cannot string together more than two good outings. The Mets need a starter who limits walks and can pitch for more than 6 innings. I honestly think the Mets should go after a guy like Jake Westbrook. The Indians have a ton of pitching depth (Sabathia, Carmona, Lee, Westbrook, Byrd, Sowers, and Miller), and they could use a corner outfielder, so it's possible the Mets could get a team like the Pirates interested in a three-way deal. For instance, the Mets send Aaron Heilman and Aaron Bostick to the Pirates, the Pirates send Xavier Nady to the Indians, and the Indians send Jake Westbrook to the Mets and a B-level prospect to the Pirates.

The Mets get their solid starter, the Indians get the corner outfielder they need, and the Pirates get a reliever who has been good the past 3+ seasons (or a potential starter), a solid lefty pitcher prospect, and another prospect from the Indians.

Another reason for the Indians to trade Westbrook, is to free up money to re-sign Sabathia...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.