![]() |
|
|
| |
« Chien-Ming Wang Injury Repercussions | Main | Mets Fire Randolph, Peterson »
4:30pm: Darrin Beene chronicled all of Bavasi's transactions - check it out here.
2:10pm: The Mariners fired Bill Bavasi today. According to the press release, "Vice President/Associate General Manager Lee Pelekoudas will take over as the interim General Manager." Pelekoudas will be a candidate in the team's permanent GM search.
I'm not going to list off Bavasi's mistakes here; we all know he did a poor job. Looking forward, you have to wonder if Pelekoudas will be more willing to trade Erik Bedard than Bavasi would've been. He could also move quickly to release Richie Sexson. Geoff Baker believes a housecleaning is much more likely now.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5537308458834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bill Bavasi Fired:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
He sealed his own fate.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | June 16, 2008 at 02:12 PM
For gods sake... it's about freaking time.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 16, 2008 at 02:20 PM
well, i expect a flurry of trades... bedard probly not gonna stay there for the rest of the season. i personally think bedard is more suited to NL work because of how he has performed this year... or at least he cant handle the tough AL West?
Posted by: bronx | June 16, 2008 at 02:24 PM
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is '**** David Samson' then you shouldn't say anything at all. So I'm not going to say anything at all."
The one positive thing I will remember this man for. I won't hire him as a GM but I'd sure as hell by him a beer.
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 02:26 PM
"well, i expect a flurry of trades"
But what will they trade. There was an article last week listing what they have and what they could probably get and frankly their most tradable chip that they'd want to get rid of (Not counting Bedard) is Ibanez who isn't worth much more than a couple low B prospect or C prospects.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 16, 2008 at 02:29 PM
as a cubs fan i hope that we trade for bedard. i think he could perform well as a #2 starter, hes not an ace. Ibanez could land a good pitching prospect or 2 from a team that is looking, like the mets or something.
Posted by: bronx | June 16, 2008 at 02:37 PM
This is a sad day...
for the rest of the AL West.
Posted by: BrianTX | June 16, 2008 at 02:44 PM
“For gods sake... it's about freaking time.”
…I think most baseball fans share these sentiments ~ well, outside the AL-W ones as mentioned by Brian…
That being said, you know he will catch on somewhere ~ they always seem to do so… Then you have to think of other GMs who might be on the hot-seat, and if your team is one of those then you better start saying your prayers!
Oh, and if youre Dodger fans, say twice as many prayers as you would think was fit ~ just to make sure…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 16, 2008 at 02:53 PM
I don't know darkstar, Tim Purpura had to take a job with MiLB because he was so terrible with the Astros nobody wanted him around their big league club....Bavasi wasn't quite Fat Timmy Purps bad, but he wasn't far off either....
Posted by: Darin | June 16, 2008 at 02:56 PM
haha good call darkstar. good thing we got Jim Hendry...
Posted by: bronx | June 16, 2008 at 02:56 PM
They could hire DePodesta and turn things around... but that's way too damn CONVENIENT
Seriously, this Pelekoudas guy needs to make some miracles if he wants to stay. He could be a good new one like Neil Huntington, or he could be like Tony Reagins >:(
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Let the Bedard to the Cubs talks begin!
Posted by: Joe | June 16, 2008 at 03:06 PM
"That being said, you know he will catch on somewhere"
Dan Duquette didn't and he actually had 2 great trades on his resume: Pedro for Pavano and Aramas Jr; Slocumb for Lowe and Tek. Also he signed Damon and Ramirez, two player the Red Sox needed to win the Series in 04. But still I'll always remember him as the guy who always emptied out the farm system as fast as he could. Still Duquette was better than Bavarsi.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | June 16, 2008 at 03:27 PM
“good thing we got Jim Hendry...”
Oh yeah ~ nothing says job security like a new owner taking over… Cubs fans, ya best be sayin your prayers!
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 16, 2008 at 03:42 PM
"Dan Duquette didn't and he actually had 2 great trades on his resume"
...Is it 100%? No... Is it like 90%? Probably... Just sayin, ya know...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 16, 2008 at 03:47 PM
"or he could be like Tony Reagins"
Um, just what does that mean? Reagins learned from an excellent teacher in Bill Stoneman and has had his 2 biggest moves pay off. The Cabrera-Garland deal was excellent given that Aybar looks to be a younger, faster, stronger and more athletic version of OC and given that the Angels were without Lackey for 6 weeks and are still without Escobar. Hunter plays a perfect style for the Angels and has come up with some timely hits and his usual amazing defense. The other thing is the move he didn't make. The trade they were going to make for Cabrera was so incredibly lopsided in Florida's favor, it isn't funny. Kendrick is WAY too good a hitter to dump while both Saunders and Santana are in the Cy Young hunt.
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 03:49 PM
"as a cubs fan i hope that we trade for bedard"
No way, really?
Well as I Phillies fan I hope we get him too. I'm gonna hope harder than you though. Hope him right into the rotation my friend
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 16, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Reagins spent a **** load of money unnecessarily. He doesn't see money as an object. I feel like his worst moves may yet to be made though
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 03:56 PM
If the price for Bedard is reasonable, we've got to at least look at him. Hell, if we're going to keep Tex and be buyers, he may be that SP we're looking for.
Posted by: bravesfan91 | June 16, 2008 at 04:00 PM
I don't see why the M's would trade Bedard. He]is value is low for him and even with a new GM, I don't think it would be a good idea to just flip for him after losing so much talent for him.
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 04:05 PM
I made a Bavasi joke the other day and then he gets offed. Brian Sabean jokes just aren't as funny.
Posted by: onephine | June 16, 2008 at 04:10 PM
I don't think Bedard's value is all that "low"....compared to what they gave up for him, then yeah, his value is low right now. But the new GM isn't and shouldn't worry about that.
He's struggled some this season and he's injury prone, but Bedard's still a young, hard throwing potential left handed ace with more than 1.5 seasons of controllability. He is a pennant race-changing acquisition and there will be a ton of interest if he is available
Posted by: wayne gomes | June 16, 2008 at 04:12 PM
"Reagins spent a **** load of money unnecessarily. He doesn't see money as an object. I feel like his worst moves may yet to be made though"
Reagins was given an open checkbook by Moreno to spend that money. Further, the only one he spent the money on was Hunter, who was worth it, in part because of what he brings to the team and in part because it kept him away from a rival. Remember, Matthews was a Stoneman acquisition (and, honestly, not nearly as bad of one as some think).
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Trading Bedard now, after the problem is was getting him only 3 months ago ~ well, I see it as a “you really, really, really cant do this” type move… The backlash could be huge...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 16, 2008 at 04:28 PM
I love how gogopalehose is quick to criticize Reagins for "... his worst moves may yet to be made ...". Way to knock a guy for moves he hasn't even made yet.
Did Reagins pay too much for Hunter? Sure - by about $2m annually and 1 year. Has the deal worked out so far? Absolutely. How's O-Cab working out for you in Chicago?
The Angels are sporting the 3rd best record in baseball despite major injuries to:
#1 Starter - Lackey
#2 Starter - Escobar
#5 Starter - Mosely
Starting 3B - Figgins
Starting SS - Aybar
Starting 2B - Kendrick
Throw in injuries to Guerrero, Izturis, Rodriguez and others and it's a miracle that the Angels have the 3rd best record in baseball.
Finally, the Angels have overspent for GMJ and Torri Hunter. Yet they still sport a payroll in the third tier with teams like the Cubs, White Sox, Mariners, and Dodgers. They have potentially $35m coming off the books in 09. I don't think Arte is stressing about the financials right now.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 16, 2008 at 04:36 PM
As an Angels fan I am very sad to see Bavasi go.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 16, 2008 at 04:37 PM
" i personally think bedard is more suited to NL work because of how he has performed this year... or at least he cant handle the tough AL West?"
Yes, he can't handle the AL West but he can dominate the much, much tougher AL East.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 16, 2008 at 05:19 PM
O-Cab is great. He's hitting .316 over the last month with awesome defense
http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/article/how_well_can_we_project_team_defense_and_other_uzr_data/
While Garland is still an innings eater, but when you factor in the money the Angels gave the Sox(4.5 mil when you look at salaries) the Angels ended up giving a definite type A for someone who might be, and enough money for the White Sox to buy their other middle infield component, Alexei Ramirez. When you consider the Angels shortstops aren't quite up to par with Cabrera(maybe offensively, but not defensively) and the Sox haven't needed Garland, you can't use it in an argument. I'll acknowledge that it wasn't a "bad" trade for the Angels because Garland has been really useful, in the same way he always has been. But don't make it seem like the White Sox got ripped, far from it.
As for Hunter, the Angels really blew that one IMO. He isn't worth that much, never was and they don't even need him as is. When I say that Reagins worst moves may yet to be, well if he can spend so much on Hunter I fear for how much they'll spend on K-Rod, Garland, and all the other guys that will be free agents in the next couple of years. Moreno won't close the wallet but it may end up handcuffing the Angels in the future.
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 05:20 PM
"They have potentially $35m coming off the books in 09. I don't think Arte is stressing about the financials right now."
Especially true considering the team is now worth something like 3 times what he paid Disney for it. Amazing that he could get an MLB team in the second largest, arguably largest, market in the country for just $180 million.
Also, with that $35 million coming off the payroll, one wonders whether GA resigns a team friendly deal. What we do know is the there is absolutely no need for Garland, as Santana and Saunders are pitching like their stuff says they should and a healthy Escobar means Jered Weaver officially becomes the best 5th starter maybe in baseball history. Hopefully they resign K-Rod, which would not actually be a big bump to the payroll if you figure he will get a $5 million a year raise. Reagins has this team set up to be both ultra-competitive and relatively cheap for years.
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 05:22 PM
Bill Stoneman deserves any credit given to Reagins in the above post.
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 05:24 PM
Torii Hunter was not a good signing AA, no matter how you slice it. Also, does the fact that you like Torii Hunter mean you hate all white people? You are a racist. Just like Josh Hamilton.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 16, 2008 at 05:31 PM
"Torii Hunter was not a good signing AA, no matter how you slice it."
How was it not a good signing? What did they Angels have there? A speed guy who has 4 good tools and 1 extremely lacking one that happened to be a team need? An expensive signing that has been injury prone in his career and is essentially a poor man's version of Hunter? Pretty much nothing else in the minors at the most important outfield position, except MAYBE Terry Evans who really hasn't proven much. Putting Figgins back there when he is more of an asset in the infield?
The truth is, the Angels needed more power, which Hunter brings and they needed a guy who can play Scioscia's running game, which Hunter can do. It also helps that the guy is without a doubt the best defensive center fielder in baseball. They stepped up ahead of other teams who were offering him MAYBE $2 million a year less and got a player who fits in perfectly with their game.
"Also, does the fact that you like Torii Hunter mean you hate all white people? You are a racist. Just like Josh Hamilton."
What kind of an idiot comment is this? Hamilton fucked over the guy who stuck by him through thick and thin because he happens to be Jewish. All because of his false illusions of a little man in the sky.
That I like Hunter's game doesn't mean I don't also like Blake DeWitt's. Hell, I can't even believe I gave you a comparison there. Your post wasn't even worth it.
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 05:39 PM
What kind of idiot comment is it to call Josh Hamilton a jew hater because he went to an agent who shared his beliefs? Pretty idiotic, no?
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 16, 2008 at 05:40 PM
"What kind of an idiot comment is this? Hamilton fucked over the guy who stuck by him through thick and thin because he happens to be Jewish. All because of his false illusions of a little man in the sky. "
Okay, so I am an idiot for making fun of your ridiculous theory, so what does that make you for calling Josh Hamilton a Jew hater because he happens to believe in god? Anybody else see the irony?
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 16, 2008 at 05:42 PM
Yeah, the $90 million dollar man has really solved the power outage with his .786 OPS /sarcasm
"It also helps that the guy is without a doubt the best defensive center fielder in baseball."
I'd be a dick but that's too easy
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 05:43 PM
"What kind of idiot comment is it to call Josh Hamilton a jew hater because he went to an agent who shared his beliefs?"
One, I didn't call him anything, I suggested antisemitism as a possibility given the nature of what he did. Two, based on what has come out about, there is no doubt that Sosnick's religious affiliation was the reason Hamilton did what he did. I would have been just as pissed if Shawn Greene or Kevin Youklis did something similar, in the opposite direction.
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 05:45 PM
"It also helps that the guy is without a doubt the best defensive center fielder in baseball."
http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B0%5D=2008&league_filter%5B0%5D=All&pos_filter%5B0%5D=8&Submit=Submit&orderBy=balls_in_zone&direction=DESC&page=1
http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B0%5D=2008&league_filter%5B0%5D=All&pos_filter%5B0%5D=8&Submit=Submit&orderBy=zone_rating&direction=DESC&page=1
http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B0%5D=2008&league_filter%5B0%5D=All&pos_filter%5B0%5D=8&Submit=Submit&orderBy=outs_out_of_zone&direction=DESC&page=1
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 16, 2008 at 05:54 PM
whoops 1st link wasn't supposed to be there. Anyway, Torii is not the best CF in baseball anymore. Sorry.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 16, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Aaron Rowand wasn't a good signing either, but that would have been a bunch better than Hunter.
And like the others have said, he is good, but he isn't the best.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | June 16, 2008 at 06:18 PM
Rowand is providing really good production for a guy who plays a decent center, for only $12 mil a season. He might not have been a good signing for the Giants but I'd take him...
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 06:30 PM
That list was very interesting. Two things stood out to.
1. The Mariners handed Bavasi a farm system that was just awful. While he had a couple of bone head trades, most just fell into the category of meh. Trading crappy player A for crappy player B. The farm system seems to be doing much better today than it was 4 years ago.
2. Bavasi made awful decisions in FA. He continually selected players that were coming off big seasons. Unfortunately, on most of those signings, you could peel back the counting stats and see that luck had much to do with a players previous success.
Bavasi took two huge dollar gambles (Beltre and Sexson). One was OK at best - the other just awful. Then he spent A LOT of money on mediocre guys who performed at replacement player levels. That caused payroll to sky-rocket and hindered their ability to go out and sign impact players.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 16, 2008 at 06:33 PM
Hunter has been good for the Angels. I wish that he was hitting for more power - that's for sure. His defense has been awesome. He may not be the best defensive CF'er in baseball but he is an upgrade over other options.
Basically, the Angels needed to find a power hitting 3B or a power hitting CF. The 3B market was bare. CF had a couple of options between Hunter, Jones, and Rowand.
Jones has been awful and as expensive (at least for 08/09). Rowand has been solid but not a lot of people were projecting that. That leaves Hunter.
Like I said, the Angels paid a few million more/year and committed to him for at least one year too long. However, for a team in a win now mode those are very minor prices to pay.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 16, 2008 at 06:46 PM
“One, I didn't call him anything, I suggested antisemitism as a possibility given the nature of what he did. Two, based on what has come out about, there is no doubt that Sosnick's religious affiliation was the reason Hamilton did what he did. I would have been just as pissed if Shawn Greene or Kevin Youklis did something similar, in the opposite direction.”
…You’ve got to be kidding me ~ youre still arguing this thory? And even worse, you somehow even feel its proven? I ask yet again, do you even know what a Christian is??? Like I told you before, just because Milton Bradley is Black and Nuts doesn’t mean he is Nuts because he is Black ~ and vise versa. Hamilton did not leave his agent because he has problems with Jewish people ~ insisting otherwise really, really, really hurts your validity on other stuff.
PS, that article you refer to was (supposedly) his agent taking about his side of things ~ don’t you think the person who was just let go right before the possibility of cashing in for a huge payday might be a little bitter?
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 16, 2008 at 06:50 PM
One last thought on Hunter ...
I'm not a big believer in the "intangibles". However, whatever they are, Hunter has them in spades - same goes with GMJ. Prior teammates have nothing but great things to say about these guys and their presence in the locker room.
I bring this up only because the Angels are playing well above their expected win/loss. Couple that with their injuries and I think it's fair to say either (1) they are incredibly lucky or (2) intangibles are coming into play - especially considering all the close games they have played.
As a fan I'd like to think it's the latter. Of course, it could all just be luck. Anyway, just food for thought.
Posted by: bjsguess | June 16, 2008 at 06:51 PM
"it's a miracle that the Angels have the 3rd best record in baseball."
With the injuries, this is literally a miracle. They're something like 7 wins above their expected win total. I believe the Angels are close to that good with everyone healthy, but it's a miracle that they are doing it with the injuries.
How can anyone defend the Torii Hunter signing? He had a career offensive year last year. It's not a coincidence that every defensive metric thinks he's average at best. Everyone likes him cause he dives and crashes into things but he takes bad routes and doesn't get good jumps. He's never been close to the best CF during any portion of his career. Before Andruw fell off a cliff, he was always better both offensively and defensively. There's a ton of other better defensive CFs too. Crisp, Ichiro, Granderson, Beltran... Damon and Kotsay when they were younger. Torii Hunter was overpaid by at least $20M. Just an all around bad signing. He's not the power bat that'll solve their offense and he's not good defensively.
I like the Angels but their two CF signings were and still are AWFUL.
Posted by: Victor | June 16, 2008 at 06:57 PM
"Josh Hamilton a Jew hater because he happens to believe in god?"
Newsflash. Jews believe in the same god as Hamilton.
"Yeah, the $90 million dollar man has really solved the power outage with his .786 OPS"
Um, his slugging is down mostly because of his BA, which has been hurt by a recent slump. He is on pace for 25-25 at a minimum plus 40 2B, and that is without his BA going up. Remember too that he is playing in a pitcher's park.
"He's never been close to the best CF during any portion of his career. Before Andruw fell off a cliff, he was always better both offensively and defensively."
Bullshit. He has been a better defensive CF than Jones for at least 3 years now.
"There's a ton of other better defensive CFs too. Crisp, Ichiro, Granderson, Beltran..."
"he's not good defensively."
You are joking, right? How many Gold Gloves does Granderson have? Zero. How many does Crisp have? Zero. Ichiro is indeed an amazing defensive outfielder, though he has always been better in right than center. Beltran is great, but he has always been prone to more mental errors and drops more catchable balls than Hunter.
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 09:26 PM
http://www.billjamesonline.net/fieldingbible/charts/leaders2-0507.gif
http://www.billjamesonline.net/fieldingbible/charts/20042006plus-minus.gif
You are in the wrong. Hunter is only a gold glove winner because he makes diving plays and robs home runs after getting bad jumps. Just because you win a gold glove it does not mean you are on of the best at that position. Gold gloves are given out because of reputation.
Posted by: gogopalehose | June 16, 2008 at 09:45 PM
Listen, Bill James isn't the be all, end all. Stats don't cover everything. Using sabermetric analysis, Andre Ethier had only a middling arm last year. Even the stats heads who came up with the analysis knew he was severely under-rated because of the limitations on their systems.
"Hunter is only a gold glove winner because he makes diving plays and robs home runs after getting bad jumps."
LMAO. Do you realize Hunter has never committed more than 4 errors in a year and has had none this year? Not only does he make spectacular plays, he makes mundane ones. All that, and he played in what is possibly the most difficult stadium in baseball to field fly balls for his whole career till this year.
"Just because you win a gold glove it does not mean you are on of the best at that position."
No, actually, that is the definition of it.
Posted by: AA | June 16, 2008 at 09:54 PM
If your last name is Bavasi or McPhail, there will always be a job for you somewhere in baseball. It's like touring Yale with the last name Bush.
And AA, you're hilarious. What a throwback. You take Gold Gloves at face value and lump all statistical analysis together as Bill James. I bet you have Wonder Bread with every meal too.
Posted by: aap212 | June 16, 2008 at 10:37 PM
""Just because you win a gold glove it does not mean you are on of the best at that position."
No, actually, that is the definition of it. "
If ignorance is bliss, you must be ecstatic. It has been shown time and time again that Gold Glove voting is a crock of sh*t. Derek Jeter is a terrible defensive ss, Palmeiro won a GG when he DH'd 130 games.
Gold Gloves are a meaningless award, voted on by idiots.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | June 16, 2008 at 10:37 PM
"Gold Gloves are a meaningless award, voted on by idiots."
They are absolutely meaningless awards which are easily the running joke in baseball for good reason ~ but they are given for popularity and flash more than just being voted on by idiots.
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 16, 2008 at 11:10 PM
"it's a miracle that the Angels have the 3rd best record in baseball."
I dunno about the miracle part, but the Angels do show the largest positive differential between their actual record and their pythagorean record -- +7.
Their run differential of +1 is 8th best in the AL, and suggests a .500 team
Posted by: davearm | June 16, 2008 at 11:29 PM
""Josh Hamilton a Jew hater because he happens to believe in god?"
Newsflash. Jews believe in the same god as Hamilton."
Newsflash, this is your arguement, not mine. You are the one calling Hamilton a Jew hater, not me.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 17, 2008 at 12:24 AM
"No, actually, that is the definition of it. "
So, David Wright is the best fielding 3B in baseball?
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 17, 2008 at 12:26 AM
"If ignorance is bliss, you must be ecstatic."
Another classic A-Rod line.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 17, 2008 at 12:34 AM
mets fired Peterson, Nieto and Randolph!!!
Posted by: Fish&Mets | June 17, 2008 at 03:11 AM
Can't help feeling bad for Willie, he is pretty classy and easy to like (despite the race comments a month ago), and although he deserved his fate, he was likable and I wish him the best.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 17, 2008 at 04:46 AM
Oops, almost forgot to say it ~ Mets fans, better start sayin your prayers…
Willie wasnt the one who should have gone, and if they dont turn it around... Well, I imagine Bavasi will be in for an interview...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | June 17, 2008 at 12:39 PM
"You are the one calling Hamilton a Jew hater, not me."
You apparently need to take reading comprehension.
"Palmeiro won a GG when he DH'd 130 games."
Wow, you pull out one example of a terrible choice and that MUST mean the GG is meaningless.
"You take Gold Gloves at face value and lump all statistical analysis together as Bill James."
You pulled out the Fielding Bible, which is James' baby. Further, the statistical analysis relies heavily on range factor (which Hunter is always way above the league average in) which is heavily flawed as it skews toward one type of pitching staff or another. Given that you take the sabermetric values at face value, you must also think the A's should win the World Series every year.
Posted by: AA | June 17, 2008 at 12:41 PM
""Palmeiro won a GG when he DH'd 130 games."
Wow, you pull out one example of a terrible choice and that MUST mean the GG is meaningless."
Actually I gave two examples. The fact that Jeter won 3 years running kind of makes it 4 examples. If someone wants to go year to year with you so be it, I'm not so inclined.
"Given that you take the sabermetric values at face value, you must also think the A's should win the World Series every year."
I feel bad for you, whatever person whether it be teacher, coach, or parent taught you logic and gave you your limited understanding of baseball must walk around with Epic Failure tattooed on their forehead.
There is some random baseball team that puts huge stock into what Bill James has to say, hell they hired him to do exclusive work for them. I'm sure with the extra 50-80 million in payroll per year and a little luck the A's could have 2 titles in 4 years aswell.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | June 17, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Actually, I said nothing about the Fielding Bible AA. I know there are a lot of people here pointing out that you're wrong, but please try to keep us straight.
Posted by: aap212 | June 17, 2008 at 05:53 PM
"I feel bad for you, whatever person whether it be teacher, coach, or parent taught you logic and gave you your limited understanding of baseball must walk around with Epic Failure tattooed on their forehead."
Wow, so am I to assume you are calling my parents epic failures? If so, you are not only a moron who can't look past percentages, you are a good old fashioned asshole. Not that they taught me much about baseball other than playing catch and balls, strikes and home runs, but still, you are an ass.
Anyway, I didn't say the sabermetric numbers aren't valuable, they just aren't the only way to evaluate talent, much like the old scouting system isn't either. The problem comes when you place too much stock in either.
As for Jeter, of the three he won, 2 came with him pulling a range factor higher than league average while posting a fielding percentage also higher than league average. Not that I think he is the best fielding SS in baseball, but the "numbers" are there to back him up.
Posted by: AA | June 17, 2008 at 06:15 PM
"If so, you are not only a moron who can't look past percentages, you are a good old fashioned asshole."
One of those two things is true, or 50%.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | June 17, 2008 at 06:31 PM
Not all percentages are created equal. Billy Wagner only has sixty percent of his hair, but he's still better than Mitch Williams.
Posted by: aap212 | June 17, 2008 at 08:53 PM