![]() |
|
|
| |
« Abreu Hopes To Re-Sign With Yankees | Main | Draft Roundup: Matusz, Alonso, Hosmer »
4:34pm: Tom Krasovic has further musings on the Giles situation. He wonders if the Red Sox could rent Giles for the rest of the season and then let him go back to the Padres as a free agent.
THURSDAY, 11:06am: Interestingly, the Red Sox won the claim on Giles. Their intent was to block the Rays, according to Ken Rosenthal. Giles can veto a trade to Boston, and he might simply because his playing time could be reduced. Also, I have learned that Giles would still be able to veto a straight salary dump. The Padres can't use this situation to sneak around Giles' no-trade clause.
Boston winning the claim means all NL teams passed on Giles, as well as most AL teams.
WEDNESDAY: According to Ken Rosenthal, Padres right fielder Brian Giles was claimed on waivers by an unknown team. Giles has about $2.7MM left on his contract this year. He also has a $9MM option for '09 with a $3MM buyout (which logically should be exercised). Giles gets another $2MM if traded. Rosenthal adds that Giles can block deals to the Orioles, Red Sox, Tigers, Rays, Marlins, Brewers, Pirates, and Nationals.
Rosenthal says the Padres will attempt to make a deal with the claiming team, though it won't be a salary dump. Giles, 37, is hitting .318/.405/.438 away from PETCO this year. Not too many players are capable of a .400 OBP.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553ef0a838834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brian Giles Claimed By Red Sox:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
mmmmmmmmmm...........
Diamondbacks?
Posted by: CUBBIES2008 | August 06, 2008 at 09:02 PM
If not them then it has to be the Mets.
Posted by: achilles17 | August 06, 2008 at 09:17 PM
D'Backs definitely make sense. Slight chance the Braves or Giants could snag him first with an eye on '09. But not likely.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | August 06, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Good call guys...D'Backs or Mets definitely make the most sense.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | August 06, 2008 at 09:18 PM
Hey Tim, I don't understand why the Mets haven't been at least attempting to get Jay Payton from Baltimore. He's been on the Mets so he's played in the tough atmosphere, plus he's a righty (which the Mets apparently need) with solid speed, a solid arm, and great defense (made evident by his 2 great catches today, including his 3rd robbed homerun of the season). His power isn't so great, but Giles' power isn't much either. Payton seems to fill the needs that the Mets have, especially considering the fact that he can play all three outfield spots, whereas Giles is primarily a right fielder, so if Church can come back there wouldn't be an issue. They won't get by with Daniel Murphy and Nick Evans patrolling left field (though I like both players, they'd be better suited at more natural positions). I don't think Giles is the answer to the Mets needs. Please Tim, I need some answers.
Posted by: BeLikMike23 | August 06, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Rays if he were able to make it all the way through the AL also make sense.
Posted by: melonis rex | August 06, 2008 at 09:52 PM
I disagree BeLikMike, the Mets could use the lefty more the way Tatis has been going. Its the Murphy/Evans platoon that would be replaced right now, at least until Church comes back. And with Tatis in RF, having a lefty in LF most days makes sense. Payton just isn't the player Giles is. Never has been and isn't now. They've both lost pop, but Giles has retained his always sterling OBP, and he strikes me as a gamer, where Payton's always had makeup issues.
That in mind, I have no problem going with Murphy and Tatis in the corner for now. Murphy has been pretty darn impressive. He doesn't look like a fantasy stud in the making, but its clear he's got a really good idea and advanced approach for a guy who was in AA a weeks ago. As Ron Darling said, he just kind of looks "hitterish", he almost always seems to have a good AB and he's really quiet in the box. He's a bit of a slasher with the swing, but it suits him, and he's already shown the ability to drive the ball line to line and gap to gap. Plus, the good instincts and makeup seem to be there, as evidenced by the double digit steals he had in AA despite very pedestrian raw footspeed and the adjustments he's made to handle multiple positions more than adequately.
I must admit, having never seen any of the three of Carp, Evans, or Murphy much (Carp got a nice look in ST 2007 but that's it), I wasn't rating them fairly at all just looking at the statlines. I probably gave Carp's hot start a little too much credit and didn't give Murphy's OBP and K/BB enough credit. He's clearly the most polished of the three, and perhaps the most likely to make it in the bigs. Matt Cerrone's been comping him to Robin Ventura which I can see. I see more of a poor man's David Wright (Interesting, I'm pretty sure Robin Ventura was Wright's top PECOTA comp early in his career): A guy who does a little big of everything, perhaps just not on the "fantasy-stud" levels Wright does.
Posted by: MEddler | August 06, 2008 at 10:05 PM
Probably because Payton is an easy out and the O's need him everyday in center with Adam Jones out anyway.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | August 06, 2008 at 10:06 PM
I was thinking about that whole thing with Adam Jones being out now and how it will affect Payton's value to the O's also. Thanks for the answer. Though personally I'd much rather Payton than Giles, if they get Giles and it works out, I'd be just as happy, and if they can't get Giles, I'd also be happy with Murphy in left if he continues to do as well as he's been doing.
Posted by: BeLikMike23 | August 06, 2008 at 10:19 PM
"Though personally I'd much rather Payton than Giles"
? Are you Payton's agent? Brian Giles's OPS+ for this season at age 37 is higher than Payton's best season. Tim was being pretty generous when he said easy out.
Posted by: Victor | August 06, 2008 at 10:44 PM
Giants have no need for Giles with Winn in RF and Nate Schierholtz waiting for his spot in AAA (along with, perhaps, Eugenio Velez, the man without a position).
Posted by: The Management | August 06, 2008 at 11:49 PM
I actually see this more of a blocking move than a team that wanted to claim him. I think that Dodgers might have claimed him to prevent him from moving to a contender ahead of them (Dbacks). They know that the Padres would not simply dump his contract him them, its not that bad of a contract.
Posted by: AirmanSD | August 07, 2008 at 12:15 AM
I know he is not exactly what the team would want, but I would almost say if he made it to the AL the Jays could be the team. My best guess tho would be the Mets.
Posted by: Dev0 | August 07, 2008 at 06:43 AM
Apparently the Red Sox made the claim on Giles.
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/weblogs/padres/2008/aug/07/red-sox-claim-giles/?padres
Posted by: gfulla | August 07, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Brian Giles is not in the lineup today against the Mets. While that could be because the left-hander Santana is on the mound, the announcers mentioned Giles has been their best hitter against left-handed pitching all year.
Posted by: Cody | August 07, 2008 at 11:30 AM
I'm hoping, as a Sox fan, this move was all about keeping Giles away from Tampa Bay and the Angels. If not, I fear it could mean Ortiz's wrist is worse than the Sox are letting on and he may be headed back to the DL. We'll see!
Posted by: cmac1973 | August 07, 2008 at 11:43 AM
Forgot where I read it, but I think Pads manager Bud Black said that this was a scheduled off day for him because he's 37 and it's a day game. Seems to make sense, but who knows.
I think odds of Giles to Sox is probably less than 5% though.
Posted by: zs190 | August 07, 2008 at 11:47 AM
i had a feeling the sox were the one that picked up giles. since the sox traded moss, they would need another out fielder. good job sox.
Posted by: Pedroia15 | August 07, 2008 at 11:54 AM
oh, will he play in the minors or boston?
Posted by: Pedroia15 | August 07, 2008 at 11:56 AM
I really don't think he's going to Boston and if he were he wouldn't be going to the minors.
Posted by: John Difford | August 07, 2008 at 12:44 PM
I can't see Giles waiving his NTC to come to Boston, unless Papi is going to be out again. However, it doesn't look like that will be the case and there are really no openings on the roster with Bay in LF, Drew in RF and Papi at DH. This is probably a move strictly to keep him from the Rays/Angels. But what do I know, I didn't think the team was going to trade Manny and they proved me wrong.
The Sox traded Moss, but they still have Coco, Ellsbury, Drew, Bay and a couple 5th OF types in AAA.
Posted by: Papelboner | August 07, 2008 at 01:02 PM
The only way this makes any sense is if David Ortiz is still injured. Then he could play right and JD Drew could DH, but unless Ortiz is seriously hurt I dont see Giles in a Sox uni.
Posted by: DirtyThirty | August 07, 2008 at 01:03 PM
I like Giles to the Angels but only if GMJ was going back. What would the Angels do with an outfield of:
Vlad
Hunter
GA
GMJ
Rivera
Willits
Giles
7 players for 4 positions. I think any fears of the Angels claiming him are unfounded.
Posted by: bjsguess | August 07, 2008 at 03:00 PM
The Padres are in the midst of a fire sale for their player's. The owner of the Padres is in a divorce proceeding and the Padres will be sold. In order to save money this year he is dumping salary, and this why Brian Giles no longer fits the San Diego profile. Jack Peavy, Chris Young and Greg Maddux will not be back next year for the same reason. In fact it would be suprising if the salary for player's would top 20 million in 2009.
Posted by: gary h | August 07, 2008 at 04:43 PM
Could Giles be a type-B free agent? Picking him up wouldn't be a terrible move if only for the draft pick.
Posted by: SC | August 07, 2008 at 05:00 PM
Peavy is signed through 2012, and I dont care if the padre's are selling their players, it makes absolutely no sense to sell peavy with his current contract.
Posted by: DirtyThirty | August 07, 2008 at 05:11 PM
If Giles did end up in Boston he would come full-circle with the man he was once traded for...Jason Bay.
Just a tidbit.
Posted by: LongSufferingBucsFan | August 07, 2008 at 05:29 PM
Padres payroll is not going below $20m. They have a new(er) stadium with decent revenues.
Dumping Giles makes zero sense. They could have moved him at the trade deadline a week ago. Would have received saved money and could have landed better prospects.
If the Red Sox pick up Giles they would need to decline his option and offer him arbitration in order to get any draft pick compensation. Would the Red Sox really gamble on a 38 year old outfielder that will probably make $12-13m on a one year arb deal?
I'm going to be shocked if Giles is anything but a Padre for the remainder of the year.
Posted by: bjsguess | August 07, 2008 at 05:43 PM
RE: Gary H,
who the hell is Jack Peavy dummy?
and the only person you mentioned out of those 3 that will ACTUALLY be gone next year is most likely maddux.
i mean really who trades a player they just ponyed up a 5 or 6 year extension to>?
Posted by: deadbeat17 | August 07, 2008 at 06:39 PM
I'm a die-hard Red Sox fan. With that said, I don't want him at all. I've never been a big fan of Giles, and bringing him to the Sox makes no sense. We have 4 OFs on our 25-man roster. Why bring Giles in when Jonathan Van Every will be called back up September 1? The only reason they claimed him was to keep him away from the Rays.
Posted by: soxfan93 | August 07, 2008 at 07:07 PM
This stinks of a larger issue...
and I hope that issue does not involve a certain power hitter and his wrist...
Posted by: UGotRPK3113 | August 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
"I hope that issue does not involve a certain power hitter and his wrist..."
I'm already sacrificing the required 5 children and praying to the baseball elders that's not the problem.
Though what would the Pads want back. If they want Bard or better, I'm screaming no... the guy has stepped it up in the pen this year.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | August 07, 2008 at 09:44 PM
i gotta think that if the Sox finish this deal and land Giles, its a direct sign that Ortiz isn't quite 100%.
Posted by: scribbletone | August 08, 2008 at 12:25 AM
I was told by a little birdy that coco is involved in the deal and it should be finalized soon...sounds like a winner for the Pads to me....
Posted by: jewofa | August 08, 2008 at 12:50 AM
I was told by a little birdy that you're full of crap.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | August 08, 2008 at 01:27 AM
I guess we'll find out how full tomorrow...
Posted by: jewofa | August 08, 2008 at 01:43 AM
Jewofa, i think you are forgetting the rules surrounding Waiver transactions. Any player on the 40 man roster must clear waivers in order to be traded. Thus it is highly unlikely that that coco has cleared waivers already. I even doubt that he would clear the American league.
If this trade goes down it will be for a couple of high upside low level prospects, that do not have to pass through the waiver wire.
Posted by: AirmanSD | August 08, 2008 at 02:36 AM
My best guess on the situation is the Red Sox were blocking hime from getting to Rays. I doubt they are willing to give up any prospect of value for him. They probably figured they would put in a claim and if for some reason the Padres decided to dump his salary (doubt that they would) then they would be willing to take it on. With the question marks they have it would serve as a good insurance policy.
His option is likely to be picked up since it is essentially for only 6 mil for the Padres and 8 mil for any other team who had him. I'm sure he could be dealt in the offseason for a mid level prospect with that salary and a one year commitment.
Posted by: UConnHuskies | August 08, 2008 at 08:30 AM
AirmanSD- you're correct, but you're not considering the fact that Coco may have cleared waivers as well. He is still owed 5.75M in '09 and a 500k buyout for '10. For a guy who is a little injury prone and light with the bat, some teams may not have wanted to get stuck with that contract and thus they let him pass through without a claim.
Posted by: Papelboner | August 08, 2008 at 08:38 AM
And I don't think the Red Sox are worried about declining Giles' option for next yr with the thought of offering him arbitration in hopes that he declines and we get a draft pick. If he accepts arb., we can then turn around and trade an on base machine on a 1 yr 12M contract, with the ability to eat a couple mil to get a good prospect back.
Posted by: Papelboner | August 08, 2008 at 08:40 AM
Papelboner: His contract is not that bad considering his plus defense in the outfield, when you look at the going rate for a CF right now. It is possible that he cleared waivers i just find it unlikely, since SD didnt claim him, and lets face it if a CF comes on the waiver wire it would be an upgrade.
Plus I wouldnt understand that trade, it doesnt give us anything the really improve the club. Not now nor in the long run. There would have to more than a simple swap. A lot more. The Offense is already pathetic, and without giles its going to get worse. Coco isnt going to help there.
Posted by: AirmanSD | August 08, 2008 at 09:20 AM
I agree with you there. A Coco for Giles swap doesn't make much sense unless Boston is paying all of Giles' contract and then most of Coco's contract for next year. The team would put Giles in RF with Drew in CF and create an OBP monster of a lineup. But you're right, it wouldn't be just a simple swap and I personally don't see the Sox making that kind of financial commitment for a questionable upgrade.
Posted by: Papelboner | August 08, 2008 at 12:34 PM
"I guess we'll find out how full tomorrow...
Posted by: jewofa | August 08, 2008 at 01:43 AM "
It must suck to be you.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | August 08, 2008 at 02:20 PM