![]() |
|
|
| |
« Iwase To Stay In Japan? | Main | Burnett Would Consider Yankees »
David O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution has a C.C. Sabathia rumor:
The figure I’m hearing that Milwaukee might offer C.C. $100 million for four years. They’re hoping that by going with fewer years and more per year, they can keep him. He’s indicated to friends a serious interest in staying there, he liked it so much. The Brewers might help their chances of signing him if they pick up the option on Mike Cameron, who’s a good friend of CC’s.
With Cameron, the Brewers figure to have over $70MM committed (not including Chris Capuano). It's hard to see the Brewers backloading an already huge $25MM salary to Sabathia, so they'd probably have to take payroll to the mid $90MM range to fit him in. Keeping Cameron and Sabathia would seem to limit roster construction - it could necessitate a Prince Fielder or J.J. Hardy trade, or leave little money for third base or the bullpen.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535bb9b94970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference C.C. Sabathia Rumors: Monday:


|
|
If CC is willing to go high dollar, low years (heavily unlikely), then that would be great for the Brewers.
I still think its unlikely though, but it would be cool. And, if holding on to Cameron keeps CC around, go for it.
I could see a Fielder trade in the works, especially if it brought back some decent arms. Either the new arms or Suppan would be forced to the pen, assuming McClung is already in the pen.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 27, 2008 at 08:53 AM
If the Brewers can find it in their plans to push the payroll near $100M-as many people are speculating they might-I think this could be a deal that keeps CC in Milwaukee. This would leave CC 32 years old at the end of such a contract and in position to negotiate for another 6 year deal after this contract. If he were to take a 6 year contract now, he would not likely be able to get as many years in his next contract as he would like.
I didn't know who I was pulling for in the WS, but with the impending excitement of free agency/trades, I'll be pulling for the Phillies tonight so we can get the show rolling ASAP.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 08:54 AM
I would also imagine that if CC stays, he would all but insist that Fielder remains as well. Those two were inseperable both in the clubhouse and off the field.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Fielder can stay in Milwaukee. I'm thinking the Twins and Brewers need to work something out for JJ Hardy. Perhaps, Nick Blackburn and a couple other younger arms for Hardy.
Posted by: TwinsMVB | October 27, 2008 at 09:03 AM
I wish you were the Twins GM. The Brewers would love to trade Hardy for Blackburn plus a couple other arms.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 09:05 AM
The thin about this possible offer of 4 years - $25M per is that the Yankees could esily go 6 years - $25M per. Even if CC liked Milwaukee, a guaranteed $50M is going to probably sway him towards te Yankees. Anything can happen in 4 years, especially with a body type like Sabathia's, too risky not to take the biggest deal possible7 right now.
Posted by: goose102977 | October 27, 2008 at 09:12 AM
For the last time, CC does not to play for the Yankees. If this really was the offer on the table, the Yankees would likely have to go $27M-$28M a season for 6 to get consideration.
I keep sayin' it, but CC will not be a Yankee in 2009.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 09:21 AM
And what do you mean "with the body type like Sabathia's"? You mean the body that type that is so big and strong that he appears to never have any signs of wear and tear?
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 09:23 AM
No signs of wear and tear yet, but I would be wary of him in the future.
By the way, did you sit down and talk to CC about not wanting to play for the Yankees? How are you so certain? From what you have read? Doesn't sound like the Yankees at all to go $27-28M over 6 for Sabathia. They will do that in a second if that is what is required.
Posted by: goose102977 | October 27, 2008 at 09:39 AM
By the way, I hate the Yankees and am not a fan whatsoever. Just want to make that clear.
Posted by: goose102977 | October 27, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Fellas, Citron1616 has declared Sabathia as a non-option for the Yankees. Lets close up shop on that one.
(Yet follows it up with my same argument from last year about why I like Sabathia over Santana. I'm torn, but my dislike of baseless proclamations wins out.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 09:45 AM
I believe CC has said that he'd go anywhere if he felt its right. Discussion of where he wants and doesnt want to go has been speculation by sportswriters looking for stories and then passed on as fact by readers.
It would be interesting to see if the Brewers brought him back if they'd continue to ride his arm like they did. Especially if they don't make any moves for another significant starter.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 09:49 AM
One thing that C.C. has made abundantly clear is that he likes the N.L. where he can swing the bat. I'm not saying that he can't be bought by the Yankees, but they are going to have to pay a serious premium over any N.L. suitor to get him.
Posted by: MickS | October 27, 2008 at 09:56 AM
It doesn't matter how big or strong you are, you pile up the abuse points like CC has and you'll be in for some definite "wear and tear" seasons....see Zambrano, Carlos.
Also, I don't think the previous poster was pointing out CC's "big strong body type". He was pointing out that Sabathia is incredibly fat.
Posted by: Teetz | October 27, 2008 at 10:23 AM
Who is least likely to break down Ben Sheets or A.J. Burnett or C.C.? I know where I'd put my money.
Posted by: MickS | October 27, 2008 at 10:27 AM
"I would also imagine that if CC stays, he would all but insist that Fielder remains as well. Those two were inseperable both in the clubhouse and off the field."
---AND at the buffett table!
Posted by: 55saveslives | October 27, 2008 at 10:27 AM
"It doesn't matter how big or strong you are, you pile up the abuse points like CC has and you'll be in for some definite "wear and tear" seasons....see Zambrano, Carlos."
He "broke down" to the tune of 195 regular and post season innings. Not sure he's the best support for your argument.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 10:34 AM
"Who is least likely to break down Ben Sheets or A.J. Burnett or C.C.? I know where I'd put my money."
Incredibly off-topic considering CC is going to get paid nearly double what either of those guys will be getting. If somebody signs Burnett for 4 years 60 mil and he breaks down, it won't be nearly as devastating if you sign CC for 6 years 120 mil and he breaks down, which is a legitimate concern considering he's lead the league in pitcher abuse points for the past two seasons.
Posted by: Teetz | October 27, 2008 at 10:34 AM
I can certainly see Sabathia staying in Milwaukee. He really did love his time as a Brewer, and he and Attanasio (the Brewers owner) got very close. Attanasio is committed to consistantly putting a winner on the field and is willing to dig deep into his pockets to do it. I don't think it is that unreasonable to expect the Brewer payroll to exceed $100 million. The fans in Milwaukee showed they'll come out for a winner. And if the team inks CC I gurantee that season ticket sales will go crazy. Now if CC is signed, the Brewers will have to make some serious decisions on other improvements. It seems like $10 million is quite a bit to pick up on Cameron's option, but who else is really out there to be had?They could also pick it up and trade him to a suitor like the Yankees who are reportedly interested in Cameron. The question then becomes who the brewer centerfielder is. Prince and Rickie Weeks are probably going to need to be dealt. To San Francisco for Matt Cain?? that would benefit both sides. But we'll see...plenty of options with Prince on the block. The Brewers could move Corey Hart to first then, and promote Matt Gamel or try to find some outfield help on the market. Trading Hardy is also an option as he would definitely bring in a nice return for Milwaukee, and the Crew has Escobar waiting in the wings at short. Has anyone else heard anything about something in the works between the Twins and Brewers for Hardy? That could be an interesting matchup... If they don't sign CC, the Brewers have a lot to play with, if they do, they'll have to make some other moves to improve the team.
Posted by: JoeyT107 | October 27, 2008 at 10:42 AM
NJM,
I didn't say Zambrano broke down, I said he's having "Wear and tear" seasons. His ERA+ has been on a steady decline every year since 2004. His K rate has declined to a pedestrian 6.22/9IP. His hit rate has steadily climbed as well. In addition to his first ever trips to the DL. Is Zambrano worth the huge contract he received? Absolutely not. Much like Sabathia, Zambrano routinely appeared among the league leaders in pitcher abuse points.
Posted by: Teetz | October 27, 2008 at 10:43 AM
I never once declared him a "non-option" for the Yankees. However, there are a number of NL teams who have what it is CC is looking for in areas other than finances and they have the money to maybe not match the Yankees, but give a very good offer that allows CC to be happy and play where he wants.
Once again, all Yankees fans think it's their god-given right to get any and every player just because they're the great franchise of New York City and they have the cash to throw around at will. Believe it or not, there are a handful of athletes that would prefer to take a little smaller payday to be happy and enjoy their jobs. From every word that has ever come out of CC's mouth on the subject, he is one of those players.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 10:57 AM
Teetz 1. Sabathia was 26th in PAP in 2007, 2nd this year. His 2 year total ranks 5th.
Teetz 2. Apologies if I misunderstood the Zambrano point, but I don't find them similar anyway. Zambrano puts far more "effort" (for lack of a better word) into each pitch; CC is more natural. I think that's what people mean about his size being an advantage. He's huge (both ways) and athletic and it leads to a relatively clean motion. Halladay (size + control combination) is probably a better comp in that regard.
Citron 1: You said "I keep sayin' it, but CC will not be a Yankee in 2009." which is basically saying he is not an option for the Yankees. There are certainly players who won't just go to the highest bidder, and CC has said a lot of the right things (although he's also said he loves NY), but when it comes down to it, the money plus the new stadium plus the city itself plus the franchise can be a strong selling point. He's not a given by any means, but all these internet declarations that its not happening are stupid. None of us know, but most of us know the door isn't shut. There is a fair enough chance he is a Yankee in 2009.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Do you always take every opinion you hear on here to heart? Last I checked, my opinions are allowed on this site and that's how I feel. You can feel free to rip me apart but that still isn't going to change the way I feel on the topic. CC will either be a Brewer, a Dodger or an Angel.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 11:10 AM
"I never once declared him a "non-option" for the Yankees. However, there are a number of NL teams who have what it is CC is looking for in areas other than finances and they have the money to maybe not match the Yankees, but give a very good offer that allows CC to be happy and play where he wants."
Citron's point is very valid. There have been many reports saying that if CC has to choose between 6/140 from New York and 6/110 from Los Angeles, he'll likely end up going to LA. Sabathia simply has decided to put his personal preferences above his paycheck, as it will be massive no matter what.
Obviously the situation changes if the Yankees offer like $50M more than any other team, which, with their shiny new stadium, isn't impossible.
"I didn't say Zambrano broke down, I said he's having "Wear and tear" seasons. His ERA+ has been on a steady decline every year since 2004. His K rate has declined to a pedestrian 6.22/9IP. His hit rate has steadily climbed as well. In addition to his first ever trips to the DL. Is Zambrano worth the huge contract he received? Absolutely not. Much like Sabathia, Zambrano routinely appeared among the league leaders in pitcher abuse points."
I agree that Sabathia simply won't dominate the way he did in Milwaukee, primarily because he's going to show some wear and tear next season. The guy threw 200 innings once in his first six full seasons, and then has thrown 250+ in his past two. And while he's obviously hit that point where he's a far different, and better, pitcher than he was 5 years ago, that kind of short term wear and tear has to do something to his effectiveness.
"Fielder can stay in Milwaukee. I'm thinking the Twins and Brewers need to work something out for JJ Hardy. Perhaps, Nick Blackburn and a couple other younger arms for Hardy."
I feel like Milwaukee could get a better centerpiece than Nick Blackburn. He had a solid year, but he'll be 27 next season, and his peripherals numbers weren't that impressive. For a top young shortstop, assuredly the Brewers could do better. If the Twins were willing to do Slowey for Hardy though, then I'm sure the Brewers would be very interested.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 11:15 AM
It's not too often that a position player is traded for a good, young starter. The move from the AL to NL would certainly improve those peripherals though.
But realistically, I don't think the Twins would even be anywhere close to considering trading Blackburn or Slowey. Both are extremely cheap, are under control for quite some time, and kept a "rebuilding team" in the thick of things for the entire season. I don't think JJ Hardy is going to lead to more team wins than either one of those starters would.
But I sure would love if the Twins would consider a deal such as that.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 11:23 AM
citron1616 - "For the last time, CC does not want to play for the Yankees." You made it seem as if we weren't allowed to talk about it and unless you are secretly CC Sabathia, I don't believe you have any idea, despite what you read second and third hand.
By the way, anyone who thinks CC turns down $30M just to be able to bat every 5th day is crazy...
Posted by: goose102977 | October 27, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Who steps up if Blackburn/Slowey are dealt? I could see Blackburn, but Slowey is a big no no. Humber maybe, but I don't think he's ready.
I don't see a starter leaving the Twins this offseason.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM
"But realistically, I don't think the Twins would even be anywhere close to considering trading Blackburn or Slowey. Both are extremely cheap, are under control for quite some time, and kept a "rebuilding team" in the thick of things for the entire season. I don't think JJ Hardy is going to lead to more team wins than either one of those starters would.
But I sure would love if the Twins would consider a deal such as that."
I wasn't saying that the Twins would ever do that kind of deal, I was just saying that I doubt the Brewers would move Hardy for Blackburn. I was just saying that the Brewers could likely do better.
As for the Twins, I think their offense will be pretty good either way. A core of Mauer, Morneau, Young, Kubel, Span, Gomez, and Casilla is damn good. They just need a solid SS (like, ahem, Jason Bartlett..) and a good 3B and they'll be set to contend.
The Twins are in an awesome position long term.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM
How would he be turning down $30M? The Yankees are going to offer him 4 year and $130M?
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 11:33 AM
I'll just clarify one more time that I think moving Kevin Slowey would be a mistake. He posted a solid 102 ERA+ in 160 innings, and his K/BB ratio in 2008 was awesome (124 K, 23 BB). If he can continue to display such good control, he should be a damn good pitcher even next season.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 11:36 AM
"Zambrano puts far more "effort" (for lack of a better word) into each pitch; CC is more natural"
There is not enough of a difference between the two to say that Z is a max effort pitcher and CC is not. CC actually throws a little bit harder...and I really don't think this point is valid.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 27, 2008 at 11:39 AM
CC will stay a Brewer! Why wouldnt he turn down 30$ million to bad every 5th day. He said he wants a good place for his family and the Brewers offer that and he loved Milwaukee. I am pretty sure he doesnt need money that much, i think he is living pretty comfortable!
Posted by: cubs land | October 27, 2008 at 11:43 AM
I meant motion, not ball out of hand results. Plenty of guys threw harder than Jeff Weaver, very few were higher stress/effort. Also, I'm not a kinesiologist by any means so I could be totally off, going by visuals. Sabathia just seems far smoother; less stress in a high stress action. Or something.
And my point above, Citron, is all of this "X *will* do this" and "Y *will not* do this" talk is tiring on a message board of opinions. Beyond the obvious (Sizemore for Melky), no one WILL or WILL NOT do anything. Most of us here have no inside information and just work off media reports which are often planted by agents and teams to skew opinions. I get bored reading statements of fact rather than opinion here. Not you personally, a lot of people.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 11:43 AM
I think if the Brewers do sign Sabathia, the focus should be on trading Fielder, not Hardy. Hardy's numbers and glove can easily translate to 3B, with Escobar taking over at short. Even if Escobar is a bit slow to take to big league pitching, his glove will save a ton of runs and Sabathia could be positioned ahead of him in the lineup during his starts to get a bit more power and do the 2 lead off man thing.
"Sabathia just seems far smoother; less stress in a high stress action."
You are right. Sabathia is not a max effort pitcher and that is what allows him to throw more pitches and more innings than your average guy.
Posted by: AA | October 27, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Opinions shouldnt be state as facts. He's not a given for any team just nor has he ruled any team out so to speak in extremes is a bit premature.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 12:16 PM
"The Yankees are going to offer him 4 year and $130M?"
CC turned down a 4 year extension with Cleveland because he wanted a 5th year and Johan money. so the Yankees are probably going to offer 5 or 6 years and between $23-$25 mil.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 27, 2008 at 12:16 PM
I really need to start proofreading
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 12:20 PM
"There is not enough of a difference between the two to say that Z is a max effort pitcher and CC is not. CC actually throws a little bit harder...and I really don't think this point is valid."
It's the difference between mechanics/delivery. Because CC is so damn huge, he can hit 96 with little effort. Seems pretty important for anyone interested in signing him.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | October 27, 2008 at 12:21 PM
"And my point above, Citron, is all of this "X *will* do this" and "Y *will not* do this" talk is tiring on a message board of opinions. Beyond the obvious (Sizemore for Melky), no one WILL or WILL NOT do anything. Most of us here have no inside information and just work off media reports which are often planted by agents and teams to skew opinions. I get bored reading statements of fact rather than opinion here. Not you personally, a lot of people."
We could change the name of this site to Armchair Gm Rumors.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | October 27, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Cleveland offered 4/80. Big difference between that and 4/100. Although I do agree that Sabathia will likely hold out for 5-6 years. But if he takes four years then he can get a new long term contract when he's 32, rather than 33 or 34.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Scribble, personally if i were in CCs position I would take the shorter contract just for the reason you stated. I would imagine he will pitch well enough to get another big contract at 32.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 12:28 PM
add an opt out clause after the 4th year?
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 27, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I wouldnt expect to see many teams giving opt out clauses.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 12:40 PM
its nothing more than to further entice him. 6 years at top dollar with an opt out after 4 so if he wants he could get a new deal to finish out his career. or if something bad like a big time injury were to happen he still has the security of the 2 extra years.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM
At what point does the money become less relevant?
CC's an elite pitcher who can live anywhere he wants and play for any team he would like. In the end, the difference in lifestyle and security between a 4/100 deal and 6/150 deal aren't that great. In either situation you are getting the dream home(s), cars, vacations, etc. For someone like CC, who appears to be very concerned about comfort, I can easily see him gambling on years 5 and 6 by taking the offer for less years, but better fit.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM
The '4 years then another contract' works for position players, but not pitchers. Pitchers are incredibly risky, and incredibly prone to injury. If CC takes $100 million, 4 years, he leaves $50 million on table with absolutely no guarantee that he will be healthy enough at the end of that contract to get $50 million for the next two years.
Besides, he'll only be 34 by the end of a 6 year contract - not exactly the end of his playing days.
Pitchers love guaranteed years. Teams hate giving them out.
And the only way I see an opt-out working these days, after seeing how it only hurts teams, is if it were mutual. Meaning, either side can enable it.
Posted by: AndrewYF | October 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM
GM, yes it would be a nice option for a player to have but from a team's perspective there is nothing beneficial about it. It will leave them in a very precarious position where they are eithr losing a star player or stuck with a player who isnt worth the money. Correct me if Im wrong, but Im not sure of many opt-out options given aside from the ones from the previous collective bargaining agreement. Throwing more money at the player seems the simpler, more ideal approach to creating interest than a self-defeating option.
"In the end, the difference in lifestyle and security between a 4/100 deal and 6/150 deal aren't that great"
This has always made me chuckle a bit as well. Either way theyre getting more money than they'll spend in their lifetime and yet there is some intangible difference.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 01:05 PM
well the organizational benefit is that you get the front line ace youve been begging for. you go with what you know and hes been a stud with no health issues.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 27, 2008 at 01:18 PM
No argument there but you can get the same thing from just offering more money.
Posted by: Scottsdale01 | October 27, 2008 at 01:28 PM
There have been a lot of guys with easy motions that subsequently have to go under the knife. Regardless of body structure and motion, the best scouting tool you can use to assess future health for a pitcher is pitch counts, innings, days rest, etc.
My basic point is I wouldn't give out a massive contract to a guy with this type of workload history. It's just proven to be a bad idea more times than not. He's been throwing a lot of innings since he was 19 and I've never seen a pitcher get driven as hard as Sabathia was at the end of last season. All sorts of red flags pop up on this one.
Posted by: Teetz | October 27, 2008 at 02:14 PM
"Regardless of body structure and motion, the best scouting tool you can use to assess future health for a pitcher is pitch counts, innings, days rest, etc."
I think I disagree. I'm big on the tangible versus intangible, but some guys are simply more durable than others. Granted, the workload is definitely cause for concern, but I don't think you can pick off the top 10 in PAP or innings each year and determine they're the most likely to break down. I think you see the red flag numbers, worry about the abuse, then consider the pitcher himself. If you think Sabathia can be a horse like Clemens, its not unreasonable to label him the lowest risk behind Burnett/Sheets (long histories of arm troubles), Lowe (age) and Dempster (140 inning jump). Factor in mechanics and I just don't see him as destined for breakdown.
(I'm also a Yankees fan, long time Sabathia fan and overall lover of big pitchers, so grains of salt and all that.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 02:31 PM
I have two words for anyone who thinks a low effort delivery assures good health:
Mark. Prior.
The guy was a scouts dream with unreal stuff and what was considered the perfect mechanics.
Look at 'em now..
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 02:31 PM
That's been pretty disproven. Prior had great size but (according to dozens of analysts) a huge flaw in his motion. Basically, his elbow got too high and severely overtaxed his shoulder. Perhaps hindsight analysis in many cases, but evidence is all over that he was misevaluated.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Right, so who is to say which mechanics ensure good durability? Everyone thought Prior had perfect mechanics and it turned out everyone was wrong. I guess this doesn't apply so much to guys who have been in the majors for 8 seasons, but I was just saying..
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Not to mention that CC generates a majority of his force by using his big size as opposed to relying heavily on his shoulder/elbow. It comes down to simple physics; mass X speed = momentum whereas mass and speed are directly related. That's a fancy way of saying that the more mass you have behind an object, the less speed is required to generate momentum. Smaller pitchers have to use their elbow/shoulder/wrist more than a guy who's got 300 lbs. to put behind each pitch.
I don't forsee any injury issues in the near future due to overusage.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 03:20 PM
But i'm no doctor.
Posted by: citron1616 | October 27, 2008 at 03:20 PM
I deffinetly think that C.C. should stay in the NL. Everone saw how doninate he was there with the Brewers leading them into the playoffs.
Posted by: redsoxbaseball | October 27, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Scribble: Even though it was only 10 years or so ago, the availability in internet video probably assures a guy won't be missed on as badly as Prior again. Before, I imagine scouts were doing a good majority of the analysis; now there are more independent people with backgrounds in kinesiology who do this stuff for websites or just fun. I have to think someone would have caught it. Of course, thats not to say CC can't get hurt, just that good mechanics help to mitigate it as much as someone making an unnatural, high stress motion can.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | October 27, 2008 at 03:47 PM
"Scribble: Even though it was only 10 years or so ago, the availability in internet video probably assures a guy won't be missed on as badly as Prior again. Before, I imagine scouts were doing a good majority of the analysis; now there are more independent people with backgrounds in kinesiology who do this stuff for websites or just fun. I have to think someone would have caught it. Of course, thats not to say CC can't get hurt, just that good mechanics help to mitigate it as much as someone making an unnatural, high stress motion can."
Of course good mechanics help translate to good durability, I was never arguing that. In fact, I was never really making an argument at all. I was simply pointing out that mechanics can't be dissected perfectly, but with CC's situation it's quite different in that he's proven his mechanics can withstand high stress situations and analyzing mechanics is quite easier that it was in 2001 thanks to modernization.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 27, 2008 at 05:17 PM
Where is all this coming from. I hear how CC doesnt care about money just living in LA. Didnt he not take Clevelands offer because he wanted more money and years. Im not saying hes definently going to the Yankees but there is a chance. The Brewers have a 0% chance of signing CC. That 25 million would be better off maybe getting Orlando Hudson and a starter. Than trade Weeks for a reliever in some sort of deal. Or they could use 12 mill for Fuentes and 13 mil for a starter.
Posted by: yankfan1 | October 27, 2008 at 06:09 PM
"Those two were inseperable both in the clubhouse and off the field."
Who buys who lunch...
While I don't say Fielder is a lock to be traded, I bet they do some serious talks.
Posted by: studio179 | October 27, 2008 at 08:31 PM
"That 25 million would be better off maybe getting Orlando Hudson and a starter. "
If the Brewers can't land a #1-2 type guy, they really shouldn't sign a starter. They have more than enough internal options to fill out the back of that rotation, they just need that guy to form a 1-2 punch with Gallardo.
And, why the hell do you sign Orlando? Complete waste of money. Live with Weeks at 2B or platoon him.
If CC is there, one of Cameron, Fielder, or Hardy is gone.
"I hear how CC doesnt care about money just living in LA. Didnt he not take Clevelands offer because he wanted more money and years."
There's a huge difference between 4/80 (Cleveland's offer) and something like 4/100.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 27, 2008 at 10:54 PM
If the Brewers aren't going to get one of the big guns, there is zero need to sign a Garland/Perez type.
Seth McClung is a perfectly capable #5 starter. Actually, he should be starting over Suppan.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 27, 2008 at 10:58 PM
Seth McClung needs to be the Closer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: domsberg | October 30, 2008 at 10:20 AM
This is what im thinking and its my opinion so say what you would like about it. The Brewers keep Sabathia 4yrs 100 mil. Fielder will get traded to Baltimore for Brian Roberts Melvin Mora and George Sherrill.
I could see JJ Hardy and Rickie Weeks going to a team like the Giants for a Matt Cain, then dumping mike cameron to the yankees. Our lineup would go something like;
1. CF Tony Gwynn Jr
2. 2B Brian Roberts
3. LF Ryan Braun
4. 1B Corey Hart
5. RF Bill Hall
6. 3B Melvin Mora
7. SS Alcides Escobar
8. C Jason Kendall
9. P
and our rotation with top bullpen guys set up and closer
SP C.C Sabathia
SP Matt Cain
SP Yovani Gallardo
SP Manny Parra
SP Jeff Suppan
RP Dave Bush
RP Carlos Villanueva
RP Soloman Torres
RP Guillermo Mota
RP Brian Shouse
SU George Sherrill
CP Seth McClung
Posted by: domsberg | October 30, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Guys, it's time to understand that Milwaukee is a player. The brewers are constantly working on marketing, someething not done before Mark Arrived as owner. Have you seen Packer AND Badger merchandise sales. If you think for one second that CC will slip away from the brewers you are mistaken. CC also became good friends with Ryan Braun, and secretly I think Ryan was helping out management by digging into CC's brain to see what would work to keep him in a brewer uniform. Remember Ryan Braun said, "sure I could have waited and got more money somewhere else, but what can't I buy with 47 million dollars?" This will ring true to CC, who has been hitting restaurants in the west suburbs telling people that he wants to stay in milwaukee. Friendships and Championships mean more than money to some guys. And CC has his best friend here in reliver David Riske, his minor league roommate. Also CC has enrolled his kids in school here. His wife loves the city and wants good schools for their kids ( something you don't get in la la land). All in all I think the deal will be done before Mccain beats Obama Tuesday.
Posted by: ace0130 | October 30, 2008 at 10:48 PM