MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« Giants Outright Walker, Correia, Hennessey | Main | Catcher Michael Barrett Now Free Agent »

Giants Discussing Uggla, Konerko And Lee?

The Chicago Tribune's Phil Rogers mentions some names that the offensively-challenged San Francisco Giants are considering acquiring this off-season, specifically, Dan Uggla, Paul Konerko, and Derrek Lee. He writes:

San Francisco, desperate for a proven bat, is expected to pursue one-dimensional second baseman Dan Uggla. The Giants also may kick the tires on first baseman Paul Konerko of the White Sox and Derrek Lee of the Cubs, both of whom have full no-trade clauses. They probably would have to deal a young pitcher—Jonathan Sanchez or Matt Cain.

I understand why the Giants would want to add some bats. They averaged 3.95 runs per game in 2008, just barely ahead of San Diego who had an MLB-worst 3.93 runs/game. But I do not understand why they'd want these three guys specifically.

  • Uggla is arbitration-eligible this year and you'd have to assume he's due for a pretty big raise from his current $417K salary. Despite this, Uggla will probably cost around $6MM in 2009, which is a steal in today's market. He's certainly no defensive asset, but second basemen with 30+ HR power are not exactly plentiful. But here's the issue - Uggla's going to be 29 in March, which is rather old for a first-year arbitration player. If the Giants somehow manage to get him on the cheap, then good for them. If they need to give up one of their young pitchers to do so, that would be a mistake.
  • If the White Sox trade away Konerko, they'd be doing so at what could be a bargain price. The first baseman will be 33 on Opening Day and is a 10-and-5 player and as such has a full no-trade clause, not to mention the $24MM due to him over the next two years. I'm not sure how you're going to convince him to waive that no-trade without tacking on another two years to the end of that deal. And while I expect Konerko to have a decent bounce-back year in 2009, he's never going to be a 40+HR bat again. The Giants are not going to be competitive in 2009 and Paul Konerko is not going to change that.
  • A similar argument can be made against the idea of getting Derrek Lee to the Bay. Also signed for two more seasons (at $13MM per), Lee's a bit older than Konerko and his power numbers have dropped quite a bit. And as Rogers mentions, the Cubs will not let Lee go without getting compensated with a Cain or Sanchez in return. Lee may have two more above-average years left in him. Cain and Sanchez is worth far more than that to a rebuilding team like the Giants.

Paul Moro writes for UmpBump.com and can be reached here: Paul *at* umpbump *dot* com.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535779b69970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Giants Discussing Uggla, Konerko And Lee?:

Comments

Giants should definitely go after Uggla. He has tons of power, draws walks, is 28 and very unappreciated in Florida. His bat would fit in nicely in the Giants lineup; his defense would not be much of a problem. He would be a great fit in San Francisco. How about Uggla for Sanchez?

Cain for Lee I'll do that.
Then maybe we could go after a first basemen on the market. Unless they have plans for Hoffpauir.

I agree, going for Uggla is not the worst idea in the world. If the Giants can get him to agree to sign a 5 year contract or something upon being traded, wouldn't that make up for the question of his arb years? I mean, to give him the security of a contract, and to give the Giants the security in knowing that they have him locked up and know exactly what they'll have to fork over every year.

This is just fan-dom (I know), but, if the Giants trade for Uggla, and somehow sign both Sabathia AND Texeira next season, then they're immediately (potentially) a first place team again.

Florida is just as much of a pitcher's park as Mays Field, right? So, persumably Uggla's power numbers shouldn't change that much, if at all. Might even improve. I would trade Sanchez for Uggla and another prospect. Hopefully they can pull that off. That is, if this option is actually there.

BLEEDINGCUBBIEBLUE, it'll take Lee times 10 to land Cain. Ain't gonna happen. I don't think Sachez for Lee straight up should even be discussed. HE'S OLD!

Ain't. gonna. happ.en.

I could see one of Alderson or Bumgarner being the main piece in a package of players to Florida for Uggla.

I could see Ugla only. As bad as the giants were they were beter then I thought. Giving Ishikawa a chance seems like a much better idea then moving a starter for Konerko. He will have a rebound year but the loss of a pitcher and adding of payroll is not worth it. Derek Lee is the same thing. Lee's power is low level for a 1b and the giants need to get real power if they trade a starter. I could see prince fielder as that type of player but that's really it.

trading cain for derrek lee or paul konerko is just plain stupid. Unless the giants want to continue to sign people who are at the end of there career and have diminishing numbers. Stupid.
Dan Uggla is decent, he has power number but is pretty weak on defense. I think that the Giants should have there eyes on Jimmy Rollins and Jorge Cantu. Otherwise they just need some middle relief pitchers

joemorgan#1, would you really put Ishikawa over at first before giving the job to Pablo Sandoval. I like Pablo Sandoval. He can hit the ball hard, even when it's not close to the strike zone.

But I agree, no reason to give up a pitcher when the Giants have these options for 1B. They should concentrate on 3B. Encarnacion would be good, but I don't know if the Reds really need pitching, so who knows what could be worked out there.

kdub, one year of Uggla is not worth someone like Bumgarner or Alderson. I think that's a bit too much.

Bumgarner is too good to give up unless we are getting something HUGE in return.

I would love for the Giants to add two of the following:

Uggla
Fielder
Hardy
Tex
CC
Cantu
Encarnacion


G's have $$$ this offseason and Cain/Sanchez to trade for the right price.

Hopefully Sabes won't be kneejerk this offseason, although I think Neukom will keep an eye on the target.

Uggla would be a good pickup, IMO. But I wouldn't consider Konerko or Lee.

Danny Uggla to SF and if somehow, could get a Matt Cain back in a larger deal including more young hitters the marlins have an abundance of and the Giants are in need of would be the greatest of hauls on the Marlins part, even if could also send them Kevin Gregg to use as a middle reliever/closer option and Mike Jacobs as a lefty power hitting 1st baseman, the Marlins have plenty of arbitration eligible players that come in much cheaper (and younger) than derek lee owed 26 million over the next 2 years and already at 33 years old.

It's three years of Uggla. 2009 is his first arb year. Besides I didn't say I liked the idea. I just said I could see it happening.

As a Cubs fan myself, other Cubs fans need to realize that D. Lee is only going to be moved for another player of his type. The deal I keep coming to in my head is D. Lee to the Yankees for J. Damon and a low level prospect. The prospect is included only because Damon has had some injuries recently.
There is no way D. Lee is going to be moved for any young MLB ready starting pitcher. If he were moved for someone younger, it would have to be 2 B level prospects...and when you consider that, I think the Damon deal works out better. just my thoughts.

That's pretty funny coming from the team that dumped Barry Bonds a year ago.

Just so everyone knows Dan Uggla was a better defensive player than Brian Roberts this past season.

Wait a second, why would this team consider any of these guys when they could get Barry Bonds for the league minimum? Oh yeah, I know. He's a cancer.

i agree with uggla, i would love to have him, but lee and konerko no thanks. why trade cain for them when we could land fielder? say those do happen and we are able to sign cc this is what our line up would look like. not to shabby...

C Bengie Molina
3B Pablo Sandoval
SS Emmanuel Burriss
2B Dang Uggla
1B Prince Fielder
LF Fred Lewis
CF Aaron Rowand
RF Randy Winn

Rotation
Lincecum
Sabathia
Lowry
Zito


I would love to see the Reds acquire Cain for EE and something.

As long as that something isn't Bruce, Votto, Phillips, Harang, Cueto, or Vazquez.

I don't think these 3 are good targets for the Giants, especially if Cain is involved. The only way I move Cain is for a good young hitter thats heads the package.

Maybe because Barry will be 43 next season and Uggs won't??

Cain for EE????


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Giants should bring in Uggla and Cantu in one package involoving Sanchez and then go sign CC and shore up the bullpen...the NL West wouldnt be that difficult to win now.

I think any of those 3 vetrans would be a mistake for San Fransisco, especially if they could make a deal to get Fielder and Hardy or something along those lines. They aren't going to contend next year. At least young mlb ready players would allow them to get ready for '10.

Uggla's defense brings down his value so if they can get him cheap then go for it, but only then. Lee and Konerko are pointless to me in the Bay. Use Ishikawa or get someone like Swisher or Garko who they could have as a part of their team for a while without worrying about injuries or aging.

this is exactly what the sox will go all out for, by moving Konerko and whoever this allows the sox to move Swisher to 1b and also free up cap space. Dye could then be packaged in a Brian Roberts trade in which the sox may give up Aaron Poreda. with all that the sox could then give more money then before to persuade Orlando Hudson and Abreu to sign. Its a bit to early for predictions but it is a very possible situation.

Irs77-
Yes I would play Ishikawa over sandoval. Sandoval does not walk plain and simple. I think he was on a real hot streak over this season an that babip will catch up real fast. I could be wrong but I don't think sandoval will keep hitting .330 every year.

"Giants should bring in Uggla and Cantu in one package involoving Sanchez and then go sign CC and shore up the bullpen...the NL West wouldnt be that difficult to win now."

To get a deal for 2 of the marlin's top prized power hitters (young also) would probably require an awful lot more than Jonathan Sanchez. The marlins might not even consider Uggla straight up for him, just my 2 cents.

Uggla's defense is not nearly as bad as the rap he has been given, the All Star game and those 3 errors are what people remember, he only made around 15 errors all season and despite not having good range, makes all the plays hit to him and does normally have good hands.

Uggla's D isn't as terrible as everyone makes it out to be. No way Dan Uggla gets traded straight up for Jonathon Sanchez. But I do like the idea of trading like Uggla, Jacobs, Gregg for Cain. Marlins would have to add another SP or something but it would be worth it.

wrote this on another post, but thought it fit better here
though i may be biased, as a dodger fan, i dont see the rockies even consider trading atkins to the nl west, or even the Nl period. EE prob wont be moved, unless for some ridiculos package, as the reds feel he is their future. Uggla could be similar to atkins. the marlins may see if an Al team would be willing to trade before even talking to the NL, just so they wont get burned during the season. if the dodgers dont resign Blake, i wouldnt mind a trade for either cantu or uggla, so long that it doesnt include kershaw, broxton, martin, loney, kemp, ethier, or dewitt(he is goin nicely, even with struggles in the postseason). this was a comment on a diff post, but does anyone seeing the yanks being interested in A.Jones. hell prob just require cash, and was reportely wanting a trade if he doesnt have a staring job next yr.
just wondering

Johns beat me to it. Uggla isn't coming cheap people. Go tell me how many 2B can hit 30+ HR's? Maybe 2 or 3 including Uggla. Marlins should just trade like all their arbitration eligible players for Matt Cain. Like Scott Olsen, Dan Uggla, Kevin Gregg, Mike Jacobs.

SP Rotation:
Matt Cain
Ricky Nolasco
Josh Johnson
Chris Volstad
Anibal Sanchez / Andrew Miller

Line Up:

CF Cameron Maybin
C John Baker
SS Hanley Ramirez
1B Jorge Cantu
LF Josh Willingham
RF Jeremy Hermida
3B Dallas McPherson
2B Chris Coaghlin

Thats assuming they don't trade either Willingham or Hermida which both could be traded.

The Marlins wouldn't want Cain, for the same reason they don't want Uggla. Too much service time already.....and I'm pretty sure Sabean isn't stupid enough to consider Cain (or even Sanchez) for Konerko or Lee.

BarroidBonds
there is no way the marlins give up uggla, jacobs AND gregg for cain, let alone adding someone else. ur insane. they can eaisly trade jacobs to the yanks, angels, rays etc, remember, only 1 team gets tex. uggla could be had for cain and a mid-level prospect, on each side, and gregg is mediocre, but is still a young reliever, and who doesnt want another reliever?

Cain is signed cheaply threw 2010 with a 2011 option.

# 07:$0.4M, 08:$0.7M, 09:$2.65M, 10:$4.25M, 11:$6.25M club option

Theres no way Uggla gets traded straight up for Cain. Either way Im saying the Marlins need Cain!

through* not threw

Barroid, the Marlins are the same team looking to deal Uggla because he's about to make 6 million in arbitration. Even though he's signed cheaply it's still about 2 million more then what the Marlins want to pay him next year, and going up. What they want is highly touted prospects with less then a year of service time. It's the same thing they want in every deal they make.

Matt Cain only makes 2.65M next year. The 6M doesn't come in til 2011. I think if they gave Mark Hendrickson 1.5M and Kevin Gregg 2.5M they wouldn't mind paying Matt Cain 2.65M!!!

I don't think Uggla would be that bad of a choice if they could get him for the right price. He would certainly be the best choice of the three names mentioned. I don't think the Giants should give up good, young pitching - it's simply too hard to come by. Then, when you do come by it, there's no guarantee on durability.

Oh, and when discussing whether a particular move makes sense for the Giants, remember that it's Peter Magowan and Brian Sabean that you're talking about. The overwhelming majority of the decisions they make for that team don't make any sense. Just look at the Ghost of Rosters Past.

Giants should trade Cain. They just shouldn't trade him for any of the guys listed here.

The Giants need AA and AAA players in exchange for Cain. Guys that can come up next year or the year after. Trading Cain for a high priced vet (Lee/Konerko) would just perpetuate the problems that Giants have had the last several years.

I just love how these writers engage in total speculation and everybody acts as if it is true. "San Francisco, desperate for a proven bat, is expected to pursue one-dimensional second baseman Dan Uggla. The Giants also may kick the tires on first baseman Paul Konerko of the White Sox and Derrek Lee of the Cubs, both of whom have full no-trade clauses..."

"is expected to"? Really, by whom? Sportswriters who rely on each other to peddle their rumors.

"may kick the tires." Sure, they might inquire, as will a bunch of other teams. But there is NO EVIDENCE OR SOURCES CITED giving any indication that they would give up anything of value for declining 1st basemen or that they've even asked.

The Giants have a new boss and he said they're gonna build thru the draft and international signings and strategic trading that will help in the mid/long run, not give up their best young players for past their prime players who would only help for a year or two at most.

Stop speculating and do some actual reporting. Jeez!

"there is no way the marlins give up uggla, jacobs AND gregg for cain, let alone adding someone else. ur insane. they can eaisly trade jacobs to the yanks, angels, rays etc, remember, only 1 team gets tex. uggla could be had for cain and a mid-level prospect, on each side, and gregg is mediocre, but is still a young reliever, and who doesnt want another reliever?"

The 3 marlins players mentioned think may have been mentioned in Jacobs and uggla's case, as an answer to the Giants lack of power and also the marlins looking to shed some of the over abundance of power they have and they can slide others into 1B next season.

The marlins would be looking for more back from the Giants certainly, not just Cain, they have several nice prospects at the AA and lower level (most notably the coveted Pablo Sandoval) and if both teams wanted to do a deal, it could be worked out.

While Kevin Gregg may be a somewhat tradeable (and affordable) reliever next season, Matt Lindstrom will probably be the closer on next year's marlins and with Joe nelson and Renyel Punto returning, paying Gregg 5mil + may be too much as a middle reliever and make him a trade commodity. To get a young pitcher of the likes of Matt Cain? Those 3 do not seem like to much IMO, especially if can get a top prospect back from SF as well.

Repeat after me. The Giants will not trade Matt Cain.

The Giants will not trade Matt Cain.

I like Uggla, but I think he is massively overated. He has always been a big power, big K guy, and I think this year he just had a few huge months turn his season into a career year. He was a nice story in 2006, but still wasn't incredibly valuable. Provided some pop from 2B with no defense. Last season was similar, though it looked much worse because of his dip in BA. In 2008, he had an oustanding May and June, but his second half was a very pedestrian .225/.343/.396. Atleast his ability to draw a BB is getting better each year. But with his defense, combined with his completely hot/cold type of hitting, combined with a very weak second half, I am beginning to believe Uggla's May/June was a fluke and he is what he is. A .250/.330/.480 kind of guy who will K a ton and provide almost nothing in the field. He has some value, but I think Jon Sanchez should be enough. I dont even know if I trade Sanchez for Uggla if I am the Giants. No chance I move Cain for him.

Trading for Uggla and perhaps Scott Olsen is a no brain er. The Giants could part with OF Randy Winn and Jonathan Sanchez, plus about $3 million of Winn's 2009 contract. Olsen could help stable the rotation that is expected to also include Matt Cain, Tim Lincecum, Barry Zito and a healthy Noah Lowry. Getting Uggla will help increase the offensive for 2009 and beyond, with Nate Schierholtz, Pablo Sandoval and a healthy Fred Lewis and Kevin Frandsen. Hopefully Aaron Rowand can come back from a awful 2nd half and Molina can continue to get those clutch 2 out hits when needed. Uggla would be under team control for 3 more seasons, and the Giants would get him at a bargain price!

The Giants will not trade Matt Cain unless the offer is absolutely knock-out. That offer is not Cain for Uggla, or Cain for Uggla+Gregg. And, I think the Marlins have plenty of MLB-ready starters and are aiming more at acquiring prospects, if I'm right.

However, in my opinion, there is no way the Giants contend without Matt Cain. You have Lincecum, an ace, then Sanchez, who looks like a 3-4, and Lowry, who knows how he will be after that surgery, Bumgarner/Alderson, who albeit promising, will still be working out rookie lumps in 2010/11 (Lincecum is a FA after 2011), and Zito (I think he can turn it around, but who knows). I don't see a major FA contract to a pitcher.

I'd focus on trading Sanchez, if I have to trade one starter.

Randy Winn and Jonathan Sanchez will NOT get you Uggla and Scott Olsen, regardless of how much of Winn's salary you eat.

Olsen is a better pitcher than Sanchez. Uggla is worth much more than Winn.

It'll cost a premium prospect along with Sanchez + Winn, I'm thinking a Alderson/Bumgarner or maybe Sandoval (Marlins need catcher).

I can honestly see Uggla in a Giants uniform. This would allow them to have an infield of 3B Frandsen, SS Burris, 2B Uggla, 1B Sandoval. With Velez and possibly Richie as utility infielders. Now what would the Marlins want? With Uggla approaching arbitration I can see the Giants making a package that doesnt include Sanchez or Cain. Winn, Sandoval, Velez, and even Molina are expendable.

People do not realize that Konerko is not going anywhere. He is one of only 3 captians in the majors. and a fan favorite of chicago, plus Ozzie, and KW love him. If KW did trade him I would loose all respect for this bad Gm.

He would be a bad GM for trading Konerko? I'm guessing KW won't lose sleep over your opinion of him.

Konerko is a fine 1B (exception this season). To somehow say that his value is such that trading him would be a negative for the team is absurd.

KW has to trade someone and If the Giants are willing to open up trade talks for a good starting pitcher for Konerko you have look into it. Yes he is a fan favorite but that doesn't mean we cant trade him to benefit the team.

how about being brutually honest here

Sanchez doesnt make the marlins rotation. They have 6 starters with just as much potential and all in the same age group and 5 are better and Miller is going to be in the rotation no matter what.


So if the giants want Uggla they are going to be giving up some of their top prospects like Burmgarner (sp) and Alderson. That is what the marlins would want back. They would not want to move uggla for nothing they control the choice and market.

His defense is far better then what you all are giving credit for as well.

And no Matt cain doesnt make sense for the fish too expensive, even though a heck of a pitcher

Fishfan79- Exactly. Uggla costs prospects, not Cain/Sanchez.

RED SOX DYNASTY- LMAO. Mocking Yankees fans? I wouldn't do Cano for Cain straight up.

I wouldn't give up Cain or even Sanchez for Konerko. He's a fine 1B, but Cain and Sanchez are more valuable than Konerko IMO.

Trading for Konerko or Lee would be a horrible idea. If you're willing to add those guys, why not keep Cain, and sign Teixeira? You would get much more production for only a couple more a year and get a much better defensive and younger 1B.

With that being said, I still don't think the Giants should acquire any of these 3 guys. Maybe Uggla if you can get him straight up for Sanchez only. But even then that leaves our rotation with only 3 starters. We would have to sign 2 average SP and probably pay them more than they are worth. And please, no comments about CC here. They just don't need to be spending that type of money this year.

I do however think they should go after Cantu. I think he could be had for much less than Sanchez. He's going to make more money and taking up a spot on their roster. If we can get him and only give up a couple of minor leaguers not named Alderson or Bumgarner, I'm all for it

I do however think they should go after Cantu. I think he could be had for much less than Sanchez. He's going to make more money and taking up a spot on their roster. If we can get him and only give up a couple of minor leaguers not named Alderson or Bumgarner, I'm all for it


sorry but that would leave us with no 3rd baseman and makes no sense for us. Plus we arent going to move Cantu for less then a good return.

now McPherson they would move cheaply I bet but not Cantu that doesnt fit for what the marlins are going for at all. We have a player for 2nd base ready that is why Uggla is available "for the right price".

I will re-iterate what most others have already stated: Cain will not be traded for any of the aforementioned players. Sanchez most likely won't be dealt either, except for the scenario involving Uggla. However, I do agree that Uggla is worth more than Sanchez, but I don't know how much considering the Marlins history of dealing away "expensive" players.

These two teams don't really match up, unless it is a Randy Winn or Bengie Molina deal that the Giants will eat most of their 09 salaries for legitimate prospects.

"KW has to trade someone and If the Giants are willing to open up trade talks for a good starting pitcher for Konerko you have look into it. Yes he is a fan favorite but that doesn't mean we cant trade him to benefit the team."

I would agree, with you on this, if you can get a good ace pitcher then we would be set. But it would take alot, to get Konerko. Trade Dye, or JV. we can easily fill in those spots, but with Konkerko his club house presence would be missed and hard to replace.

What has Sanchez proven? Nothing. The Giants would be getting a steal if they manage to turn Sanchez in to a good offensive player. D. Lee for Sanchez? The cubs would be stupid. Sanchez for Uggla? The Marlins can get more. People bash the Yankee fans for overrating their young players but talking about Sanchez and his career era of over 5 gets no bashing. I think every teams fan overrate their prospects.

"What has Sanchez proven? Nothing."

I could say the same thing about Hughes.

Sanchez's k/9 rate is sufficently high enough to suggest if he ever gets his stuff under control he could end up being quite talented. Yes, he's a high risk, but he's also high reward, which is why he could be worth an above average defensive player. Though I do agree, straight up for Lee or Uggla is far from sufficient. Also I don't see the Marlins taking Sanchez, they'd either want someone like Cain or someone much younger and further from arbitration.

Start wearing purple- Totally agree with you on Hughes, should of traded him for Johan when they had the chance.

Unfortunately, the Cashman/Steinbrenner trade offer either believed the hype about Kennedy or assumed Bill Smith actually thought Kennedy was an ace prospect and was not so coincidentally an idiot.

Yeah, they should have taken the bird in hand. Last year, Hughes + Melky + an A prospect + a little extra likely would have netted Santana.

Sanchez has huge promise nyyfan, even more then Matt Cain. He is second to Tim Lincecum for most exciting pitcher to watch on the Giants. He's a left handed pitcher who racks up K's consistently. He broke down at the end of this year but you have to remember he's a converted relief pitcher so with the heavy workload this was expected. With time and training he should be able to throw around 180 innings next year. The hitters never get to see the ball, his stuff is electric and he delivers the ball from a couple different arm angles. What Tim Lincecum is to Matt Cain is what Jonathan Sanchez is to Noah Lowry.

"sorry but that would leave us with no 3rd baseman and makes no sense for us. Plus we arent going to move Cantu for less then a good return."

You really think the Marlins will pay him the $4 mil or so he'll be getting in arbitration? Why would they pay him almost as much as Ramirez will be making?

"sorry but that would leave us with no 3rd baseman and makes no sense for us. Plus we arent going to move Cantu for less then a good return."

You really think the Marlins will pay him the $4 mil or so he'll be getting in arbitration? Why would they pay him almost as much as Ramirez will be making?

Posted by: DawgFight24 | October 11, 2008 at 10:53 PM


because they hold him 1 more year then we see Matt dominguez is ready and if not we can hold him 2 more. If he does continue to show sustained sucess then his value would skyrocket in trade. He was the most consistent player upon the team this year overall and the marlins arent far off from the playoffs. With their rotation back to itself now that the injuries are past coupled with their good bats (and improving defense) they easily could contest next year for the NL East.

"Sandoval does not walk plain and simple. I think he was on a real hot streak over this season an that babip will catch up real fast. I could be wrong but I don't think sandoval will keep hitting .330 every year."

Who cares if he doesn't walk? Tony Gwynn didn't walk. Ichiro doesn't walk. Vladimir Guerrero doesn't walk much. Mike Piazza didn't walk much. You think players need to walk 100 times a year to be good hitters?

Anyway, simply pointing to BABIP doesn't tell the whole story. You have to look at how big a difference between the players BA and BABIP there is to see if it is a luck issue or if the guy simply rakes. Sandoval's BA was .345 and his BABIP .356. That .011 difference is less than that of the AL Batting Champion and acknowledged awesome hitter Joe Mauer at .328/.342. It is also less than Chipper Jones' .364/.383 split.

Also, if a player isn't a big time slugger like Pujols, the BABIP differences will become more and more pronounced, because there aren't the offsetting HR totals, which aren't considered Balls In Play.

what about matt cain for kelly johnson and a decent prospect from atlanta?

--Robinson Cano for Tim Lincecum?

--Edwin Encarnacion for Matt Cain?

--Kelly Johnson + Prospect for Matt Cain?

Some people REALY undervalue pitching!

55saveslives:Bumgarner is too good to give up unless we are getting something HUGE in return.

I would love for the Giants to add two of the following:

Uggla
Fielder
Hardy
Tex
CC
Cantu
Encarnacion


G's have $$$ this offseason and Cain/Sanchez to trade for the right price.

Hopefully Sabes won't be kneejerk this offseason, although I think Neukom will keep an eye on the target.

I definitely agree with this if they want to be a contender in 09

55saveslives:

Cain for EE == LMAO
Cain for KJ + prospect = Unless the prospect is a Heyward/Hanson/Freeman type, no.

Lincecum for Cano- I think the person who suggested that was sarcastic, or smoking some very strong stuff. Lincecum is as untouchable as they get.

As much as Linecum and Cain might be under valued. Bumgarner is probably slightly over hyped, though I'll take heat for that.

Look, I say this as a White Sox fan, so I'm probably biased.

I think it would be a very smart move by the Giants to snag Konerko. They'd only have to give up a pitcher, I'm not talking about Cain, I'm realistic. Bumgarner? Probably not. Alderson + Lowry? That's what I'm thinking.

Now, you may say "Why trade for a 1B when we have Ishikiwa + other dude..." Well look. There's a rebuilding team up in Seattle. I think one of those top 1B prospects could land the Giants Adrian Beltre, who may just get his bat back if he returns to the NL West, and provides the best 3rd base D in the game, and a pitcher too, maybe Bedard. That sets up the Giants with 3 proven veterans with HUGE bounceback potential for relatively low prices, and with the NL West, anyone can win with that.

Who would the Giants trade in your scenario that has them acquiring konerko, beltre and bedard?

The Giants are rebuilding just like the mariners, the long way.

Ishikiwa (sp?) and Alderson

Jimmywins1- Why would the Giants trade for Adrian Beltre, when Beltre will be an FA after the '09 season anyways, and the Giants probably won't contend in '09?

Giants need to get younger, not older.

I don't think Konerko alone could get Alderson. Why would Konerko even wanna go to the Giants unless he got more $$$$$$

It would be awesome for the Giants to trade Cain,Sanchez, Molina and Winn for marlins uggla jacobs, gregg,a grade B prospect. (we'll keep trying to shop olsen).
My lineup would be
1.Maybin CF
2.Baker 1B?
3.Ramirez SS
4.Cantu 3B
5.Coughlan 2B
6.Winn LF
7.Ross/Hermida RF
8.Molina C
9. Pitchers spot

Rotation
JJ
Nolasco
Cain
Volstad
Either Sanchez's

I checked both cain and sanchez's stats and most of the losses dont add up to bad pitching. It was just the lack of bullpen and run support. The marlins will be able to provide that due to their famous last minute combacks
power hitting. I could definitly see Cain and Sanchez as 17-5 or
15-8 with a 2.50-3.40 ERA. Both pitchers are talented in the art of strike outs and their rates are pretty well groomed. As For Molina and Winn, The Molina bros barley strike out and are situational hitters, Winn as well. This would be a completley incredible defensive and pitching upgrade for the fish. They will contend in 09. I wonder what else the marlins have in stored through the winter? What do you guys think?

"As much as Linecum and Cain might be under valued."

I don't think anyone in the world undervalues Lincecum. Cain, on the other hand, is really hurt by the Giants' terrible run support and by being overshadowed by Lincecum.

"It would be awesome for the Giants to trade Cain,Sanchez, Molina and Winn for marlins uggla jacobs, gregg,a grade B prospect."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

1) I don't think the Fish would want to take on that salary

2) The Giants would be insane to accept that package. Cain is worth more than Uggla straight up when you consider cost control, age, position, etc. Sanchez alone is worth at least Jacobs + Gregg, especially when you consider Jacobs' piss poor OBP. And then you want Winn, who was the Giants' best overall offensive and defensive player last year, and Molina who's strengths (power, defense, game calling, microscopic K rate) certainly outweigh his free swinging and plodding speed.

I HATE THE MARLINS PUNNY PAYROLL!! DAMMIT WHY ARE YOU GUYS SO CHEAP!!

"BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA"
your an ass.

i so tired of hearing of uggla's lack for defense. Cause he an underrated fielder. he has a .981 fielding percentage, which is 7th best in the league for 2nd basebal. but he has 13 errors, and so does Cano and Utley, and there both high praised fielder. stop trashing of him, cause he a good fielder that only improving.
the whole bad fielder rep came from the allstar game, and yeah he suck, but when the game really counted( in the season stats) he had a great year.
i not for the trade i just want people to great it right.

cantu is not available. unless the giants overwhelmed then with a package like what they got from the cabrera-willis trade. which would be like sanchez, alderson, winn, grade b prospect pitcher(again)
also what is cain making? cause the marlins would take him if he cost more than 10mil.

Cantu is now being compared to Cabrera. WOW!!!!!!!! Humidity has to be affecting brain cells...

MDG...Giants can't trade Cain AND Sanchez. It would be either or...

Giants could prob get both Uggla and Jacobs for a package built around either Cain OR Sanchez. Marlins wanna move them before their salaries go up and they could use another young arm. This would address 1B and 2B for the Giants although if I were them I'd lean more towards trading Sanchez than Cain.

FP3

NOBODY wants Konerko!2yrs at 24 mill for dwindling stats

No Thanks!

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.