![]() |
|
|
| |
« Macha To Be Named Brewers Manager | Main | Tigers Decline Renteria's Option »
THURSDAY: It's official: the Royals have acquired Jacobs for Nunez, according to Dutton. It now seems that the Royals have a surplus of 1B/DH types.
WEDNESDAY, 10:38pm: Joe Frisaro of MLB.com says the deal would be Jacobs for Nunez, and it could be announced this week. Nunez, 25, posted a 2.98 ERA in 48.1 innings. His strikeout rate was weak, but he managed to keep the ball in the yard despite flyball tendencies. He threw quite hard, averaging 94.4 mph on his heater. He missed some time with a strained lat.
Rany Jazayerli considers the Royals acquiring Jacobs a terrible idea, and worries that it could lead to a Billy Butler trade.
8:31pm: Dutton says this evening that the Royals are moving closer to a deal for Jacobs. The Marlins apparently rejected a trade for Rosa, and current discussions involve a ready-now reliever. Dutton believes it could be Leo Nunez or Ramon Ramirez.
9:02am: According to Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star, first baseman Mike Jacobs remains a possible acquisition for the Royals. Jacobs, 28, hit .247/.299/.514 in 519 plate appearances this year. He struggled mightily against lefties this year and in '06, but handled them in '07. Trade talks with the Marlins stalled over the health of pitching prospect Carlos Rosa. The Mariners, Blue Jays, and Giants are also in on Jacobs.
It's surprising to see the Royals apparently willing to give up a prospect for a first baseman - they have a couple of palatable (and cheaper) options in Kila Ka'aihue and Ryan Shealy. Ka'aihue's minor league equivalent says he could hit .243/.390/.442 in the bigs.
Dutton was the original author of Sunday's Mark Teahen/Indians rumor, and he wrote today that sources from both clubs gave it to him. Royals GM Dayton Moore says "somebody lied" along the way.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535c7ea18970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Royals Acquire Jacobs For Nunez:


|
|
I get why the Royals want him. They really need some power and he's a very legitimate power threat. But his defense is really poor and that OBP simply isn't good enough to give away a good pitching prospect. Billy Butler would have to play the field if Jacobs took over at DH, and Ka'aihue deserves to get a shot at first base.
I think Jacobs is better off going to a team like the Giants, where they are so power inept that adding Jacobs would actually be a decent acquisition.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 29, 2008 at 09:21 AM
This would be a step backwords for the Royals. Shealy and Kila both have about the same power potential as Jacobs does. Giving Carlos Rosa up for another first basemen is not a smart move. Expecially with Butler at DH. This move would just waste money and further crowd an already crowded first base position.
Posted by: royalswin | October 29, 2008 at 09:43 AM
Crazy IMO. Gotta go with Ka'aihue- Shealy can spot start against tough lefties.
Posted by: kinsler5 | October 29, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Unless you can trade Mark Teahen for him (heavily unlikely), do not trade anything of value for Jacobs.
1. Royals need OBP. They need people who can take a walk.
2. One of Shealy/Kila can take care of 1B. Deal with other important spots.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 29, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Oh, and Royals need pitching. Keep Carlos Rosa.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 29, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Jacobs just doesn't make sense at all. Moore has been preaching his philosophy about building around young pitching, so why would he give up one of their best pitching prospects to create a bigger logjam at 1st?
While Gordon will most likely stay at 3rd, Hillman has stated that he is in the mix at 1st in the off chance they decided to move Teahen back to 3rd. So that leaves:
Shealey
Ka'aihue
Gload
Teahen
Gordon to potentially to play 1st next season.
Posted by: PJH | October 29, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Oh, and although doubtful, Butler could always turn it around defensively. And he will definitely fill in for a handful of games.
Posted by: PJH | October 29, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Someone always lies along the lines, don't they? Is Rosa the only guy the Marlins wanted for Jacobs, or was he just the hang-up? If he is the only one the Marlins want, I'd do the deal if I were KC. You get an established first baseman who's already played in a difficult stadium to hit home runs in, and you'd get him for his prime years.
Posted by: themarksmith | October 29, 2008 at 10:31 AM
If the Royals are going to give up a good pitching prospect they should be going after a catcher, outfielder or second baseman. They should look at guys like Hermida, Pie, Hu, Salty, Weeks or even Fernando Perez. They just need to look at guys who fill spots, take walks and have some upside.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 29, 2008 at 10:33 AM
I don't think this is all that bad of a move. There is a big difference between Jacobs and Ka'aihue/Shealy.
That difference is 'potential'. Shealy and K have it...Jacobs has proven it in the bigs. His acquisition would allow the Royals to unload Gload/Shealy/Butler in another deal.
You can't look at a deal like this by itself...you have to consider what other opportunities it may open.
Posted by: Otis26 | October 29, 2008 at 10:38 AM
I agree. What do they need another 1B that can hit .250 for? They already have enough of that with Ka'aihue and Shealy. What they need to trade for is a good defensive shortstop that can get on base. Unless they think they can fill that up in FA, but other than Furcal, who else would be worth the money?
I like the idea of moving Gordon to 1B and Teahen back at 3B. He plays better there than he does at RF, and this allows them to either go for a CF, so they can move DeJesus to LF, or trade DeJesus to open up a spot to play the likes of Gathright (ok, this might be a longshot) and someone like Maiers (he still has potential, imo).
In any case, I think they should try selling high on DeJesus and blow their OF up. But I think that is highly unlikely, as Moore himself has said that he's sick of losing and that the learning portion for the team is done, and they should start showing what they have, next season. As in, being competitive and fighting for a playoff spot.
But honestly, with that team, competing with the likes of Detroit, Cleveland, Minnesota, and Chicago in that division?
I think Moore would be open to trading DeJesus for an MLB ready pitcher that could help them next year. As it stands now, a rotation of Meche, Greinke, Bannister, Hochevar, and whoever their 5th starter would be for next year, is not very imposing. And not even close to competing with the rotations of the other 4 teams in their division.
Posted by: Patrick | October 29, 2008 at 10:42 AM
if the Jays are in on Jacobs any word/idea on who they would have to give up to get him?
Posted by: SpecialFNK | October 29, 2008 at 11:20 AM
We all know what the Royals should do in the trade market. GMDM is just getting the ball rolling. Remember he said that there would be major changes to the Royals roster in 2009? First off, Rosa has TWO PITCHES. That leaves him for back of the bullpen duty. Second, Jacobs is a HORRIBLE DEFENDER. Do you really think that GMDM would pull off this sort of trade and ACTUALLY have Jacobs be the everyday 1B? NO. If this move were to have been pulled off, it would have signified that Billy Butler was on the move. Shealy/KK/Gload-(ARGH) will man the field while Jacobs DH's. Billy Butler and his overweight, my stats mean more to me than the team winning, so what if I got sent to Omaha for a month because of my attitude, I can still rake, 22 year old of a punk kid, ass, will get traded for a AAAA starting pitcher or two.
MARK MY WORDS!
Posted by: Grantastica | October 29, 2008 at 11:24 AM
"First off, Rosa has TWO PITCHES. That leaves him for back of the bullpen duty."
And? Sandy Koufax had 2 pitches and was one of the most dominant pitchers of all time.
Posted by: AA | October 29, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Koufax? Honestly we're comparing him to Sandy Koufax? I understand your point but there are far way more pitchers with only two pitchers who had to pitch out of the bullpen than there have been Koufax's?
I really think Butler has atleast a couple more years before the Royals send him off for anything.
Posted by: basicslop | October 29, 2008 at 01:23 PM
SpecialFNK, the Blue Jays are going to possibly lose Burnett this offseason. Marcum is out for the year. McGowan is coming back from surgery. I would think that the Jays are more worried about fixing that rotation, rather than adding another 1B when they already have Overbay and Snider that can play 1B there. And Lind possible at DH.
I mean, after Halladay, they'll be using Litsch, McGowan, Purcey, Romero, and they are thinking of adding Frasor and/or Janssen to that rotation. Do you think, that with their weakened rotation, they would be interested in trading away a pitcher for an average 1B/DH that has terrible defense, terrible contact rate, low OBP, and everything else? NO, I highly doubt they would be interested in trading for Jacobs.
Posted by: Patrick | October 29, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Gordon will never play first base as his everyday position. And let me repeat... EVER. He may not be panning out at the plate (which i really hope he does this year cause he is my favorite player!) but he is one of the best defenders in the game. He is over looked at third base too often and is spectacular there. There are way too many first basemen to even consider Alex for the spot. Alex is just too fast, has too much range, and too much arm strength to even consider 1B. And sorry Grant but i think you are very very wrong about Butler. Nobody in the Majors cares what there stats are. They all just want to play and win. Butler is no different. He was sent down because he was slumping at the plate, not because of his attitude. I expect big years from AGordon and BButler in 2009.
Posted by: royalswin | October 29, 2008 at 06:43 PM
Royalswin, actually, that isn't exactly true. About there not being a player in the Majors that cares about what their stats are.
There were rumours going aroung that Ichiro cares more about his stats instead of winning. Thus, he tries to make contact more than hit a homer.
People would argue that A-Rod cares more about his stats than winning, hence, the Yanks inability to beat out the BoSox and Rays this year, and win the WS this year and last.
You can't exactly say that nobody in the Majors cares what their stats are, because that wouldn't be the truth.
Posted by: Patrick | October 29, 2008 at 08:37 PM
I think we really need to give it up for Tim... burning the midnight oil to snag the rumors. YEAH TIM!!!!! I wouldn't have seen it tomorrow but PHILLY IS ROCKIN RIGHT NOW, NONSTOP SCREAMING, HORNS, SIRENS AND FIREWORKS.
Posted by: nyankees | October 29, 2008 at 11:37 PM
Really weak trade! Nunez has decent stuff and the royals are in no position to move productive pitchers. So now they'll have 4 1b. Kila should get a legit shot with shealy hitting lefties and mixing in to dh with butler.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | October 29, 2008 at 11:50 PM
BleedinBlue: While I agree with you some players may care more about Stats (but usually only guys in contract years or something like that) then winning I think its rare and you gave two bad examples. Why would anyone in Seattle want Ichiro to be swinging for the fences more times then not that ball will be an out on the warning track than ending up in the seats. Ichiro should always try for contact with his speed he can stretch singles into doubles as well as steal a few bases.
I think people argue that A-rod is not worth it b/c he "chokes" under pressure and in the playoffs. If not for Arod these past few years the Yanks might have missed more than just this past post season. I don't think people can say he is selfish about stats or status b/c lets look at the facts. He was the best SS of his Era and moved off the posistion (the most prime posistion in baseball one could argue) to give way to a worse SS. I don't really think one can call him selfish when it comes to status.
As for Butler I've always thought that he had his head on right and I can't really recall reading otherwise. That being said I could actually see him being shopped if this Jacobs deal goes down. Butler could net 2 solid pitching prospects in return. And the Royals would be pretty set at 1b/DH.
I have to say I think getting Jacobs for Nunez is a steal. While Jacobs is far from perfect he's got some good power 32 HR's are pretty good in only 477 AB's. Also he played if one of the better pitchers parks in baseball. I think he should be going to the AL as DHing is the best thing for him. Also he's not that old and while he will be starting Arb. he would be making Ryan Howard money i mean he'll prob make what at most $20 million over these 3 years, thats not a bad deal. And with the Royals giving up only a solid young relief pitcher I think they come out ahead.
Posted by: Steveo26 | October 30, 2008 at 12:11 AM
The Royals stole him from the Marlins. The Mariners should do some last minute talking.
Posted by: baseballismylyf4 | October 30, 2008 at 12:36 AM
As a Giants fan...
Please let this deal go thru!!!
Posted by: 55saveslives | October 30, 2008 at 12:56 AM
I like this deal for Kansas City.
Trade Ka'aihue/Shealy/Bulter for pitching and use the remaining one at first or DH depending on where they want Jacobs.
Jacobs is a quality power hitter who definately makes this Kansas offense stronger. Plus getting away from Florida's giant left field wall could boost his power even more.
He just needs to improve his eye.
Posted by: insomniac | October 30, 2008 at 01:55 AM
I don't see why Giants fans or bloggers like El Lefty Malo are so uptight about the Giants dealing for Jacobs. Frankly he's the only player on the list of suspects (er, players in their system with rumored upside) that might just consistently hit home runs at AT&T Park. And yes, he's not J.T. Snow with the glove but he's okay. The Giants were horrific offensively last year and they need a legitimate power threat. What other position are they going to find that threat? Maybe 3B or possibly with the addition of a power hitting RF (I'd love to see Magglio Ordonez end up in San Francisco as he was recently rumored to be on the block). Jacobs won't cost too much and he's a viable part of the equation. Frankly he makes more sense for the Giants than the Royals. Heck, maybe the Giants can pick up Shealy now on the cheap (i.e. for nothing) as a platoon player at first. Guys like Bowker, Ishikawa, etc. just don't give me much hope. I do like Sandoval but I think he's a stopgap behind the plate next year with Bengie being moved this offseason for prospects (sure hope the Mets are feeling generous, LOL).
Hey, I'm not foolish enough to expect great things from Jacobs but I do like the idea of a player who has tons of power and can threaten the opponent with a ball into the Cove now and again. He's an upgrade above anybody other than Sandoval that the Giants might trot out there next year. Sad, sure. But it's true and Jacobs will probably deliver solid numbers for a couple of seasons. As long as the price isn't too high, I say pull the trigger Sabean.
PS. Jacobs hits lefties only in "odd" numbered years, LOL. So he's the man to get for 2009 ;-) Seriously, he was good agains them in '07 and poor again in '08. I'll take my chances with Jacobs in a platoon to make more positive impact on the Giants than the likes of Bowker and Ishikawa. If Sandoval stays at 1st base, fine. No deal. But if Sandoval goes behind the dish or to 3rd (wouldn't that be a sight over the course of a full season on defense), then Jacobs isn't a horrific move as some have stated here....
Posted by: YeagerFan | October 30, 2008 at 04:11 AM
Jacobs for a reliever(not named Soria)?
This deal is looking better and better for KC.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 30, 2008 at 05:24 AM
The Jacobs deal makes no sense unless there is another trade coming.
Posted by: texassooner | October 30, 2008 at 06:28 AM
"The Jacobs deal makes no sense unless there is another trade coming."
Agreed. While the Royals severely lack power it could take valuable playing time away from development of Butler, Shealy, and Ka'aihue. So either one of them moves to the outfield, meaning Teahan really is on the market or Moore actually thinks he can dump Guillen. Or Ka'aihue is dangled for a youngish starter or shortstop. Of course it could mean good news for Royals fans, Gload sits.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 30, 2008 at 08:27 AM
Although Jacobs might not be a perfect fit for the Royals, if all they are giving up is the one reliever to get him its hard to argue against the move.
They could always be setting up to start moving other players. The guys OBP and OPS are a little rough, but at what they are paying it may be worth it to role the dice on Jacobs taking a liking to the AL. He has 35-100 potential I would think.
Posted by: Chris | October 30, 2008 at 08:35 AM
What an absolutely fantastic deal for the Royals! Jacobs may not fit in their plan right now, but the value in the trade is a complete rip off of the Marlins.
How many teams had a player hit more homers than Jacobs? Only 10 so they are getting a special player.
I really wish the Jays could get him, they have several relievers better than Nunez and Jacobs actually has an open DH spot waiting for him. He his 2x more homers than anyone on the team.
Posted by: Grant77 | October 30, 2008 at 08:39 AM
Completely agree with everyone who says that Jacobs-Nunez would be a good deal for KC.
If they can land him for a pretty low ceiling guy like Nunez, then it would be a pretty damn cheap way to add a guy with 35 HR power.
I really think this would be a poor deal for Florida. Guys like Nunez aren't all that rare, but few guys can legitimately hit 30 plus home runs in the majors. I wouldve expected the Marlins to land a better young player than a 25 year old reliever with solid closer upside
Posted by: scribbletone | October 30, 2008 at 09:44 AM
Now i like this trade. Leo is not always consistant out of the pen but he is solid. The Royals are giving up almost nothing for a legitamite power first basemen. Sorry for Kila though because he seems to be the odd man out at first base this year. Another year in AAA will test what he can really do though.
Posted by: royalswin | October 30, 2008 at 09:45 AM
"special player" with a .299 OBP ? LOL
Posted by: kinsler5 | October 30, 2008 at 10:03 AM
"Smart move for a small market team looking to improve the right way"
No, the smart move would be to play Kila, who has a 50/50 shot of being just as good, and keeping your 25 yo reliever 2.98/1.24/.249
Posted by: kinsler5 | October 30, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Jacobs is not even okay at firt he's in the top 2 worst filding 1b. The royals need power yes but most of all they need players who won't make outs! Jacobs does not get on base! Kila will at least do that. Jacobs will cost at least 2.5 to 3 mill! What is the point when shealy does the same thing for minimum. Trading a productive pitcher for a guy who when you combine defense is the worst 1b in baseball does not make sense! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills here!!!!
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | October 30, 2008 at 10:58 AM
So much for Dayton Moore's insistence on adding high OBP guys ...
Posted by: ink-stained scribe | October 30, 2008 at 11:08 AM
This deal has just been officially announced.
What a steal for KC - a power hitter just entering his prime for a reliever.
Posted by: SBE | October 30, 2008 at 11:21 AM
As much as you can complain about Jacobs' OBP, this is still a solid deal for KC.
They really needed some power, and you can't deny that Jacobs has serious power.
And at that cost, its definitely a deal worth making.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 30, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Agree with both above.
So stoked that the deal is announced. Shealy, Kila, Butler, and Gload combined for 22 homers last season at first.
That's crazy. Now we can clear that logjam at first by moving some of them.
Great move and I'm a lock to renew my season tickets now.
Posted by: Otis26 | October 30, 2008 at 11:33 AM
This is an absolute steal for KC.
I was against giving up Rosa or a top prospect for Jacobs, but if Jacobs can be had for Nunez, go for it. He brings a big bopper to the team, something they so desperately need.
I see Gload and Shealy simply gotten rid of, since they have minimal value, and possibly a Butler trade. Or maybe even a Teahen trade (although Teahen is at 3B).
Quick question: Could Jacobs play LF?
Posted by: melonis rex | October 30, 2008 at 11:46 AM
BOOO!!!
Its almost like Dayton is intentionally trying to acquire low OBA guys.
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | October 30, 2008 at 11:47 AM
I have no idea why I included Shealy in the "simply gotten rid of" statement. Just Gload simply gotten rid of.
"No, the smart move would be to play Kila, who has a 50/50 shot of being just as good, and keeping your 25 yo reliever 2.98/1.24/.249"
Jacobs is under team control for 3 years, and is proven. He brings power to the team, and the Royals didn't give up that much value to get him.
Although, this could raise the value of relievers in trades.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 30, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Where does this place Butler for next season? He absolutely tore up pitching the second half after his re-call, but I don't see any place for him now with Jacobs in the mix.
I wouldn't mind seeing the Yanks trade to get Butler. They do have a pitching surplus, and it's not like they are trading him for an older player. Unfortunately living on the east coast, I didn't get to see his defense all that well. How is his D?
Posted by: Colton | October 30, 2008 at 11:59 AM
I agree with Rany's take...Moore seems to think power is more important than OBP to an offense.
The price for Jacobs doesn't bother me terribly, but a rebuilding team like the Royals had a great opportunity to give PT to young cheap players like Kila, Shealy, Butler.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | October 30, 2008 at 11:59 AM
This just seems stupid to a royals fan like myself. Leo was whatever. But we have options at 1B.
This sets up the embarassing situation for this "young" royals team where we might have two of our younger more talented hitters starting the year in Omaha.
But I've never ran a baseball team so what do I know?
**Please tell me this doens't lead to us trading Butler. Ugh.
Posted by: basicslop | October 30, 2008 at 12:11 PM
I think that the only real issue with this deal is that it reflects a serious issue in Dayton Moore's moves as a GM.
Moore is showing a serious pattern of not prioritizing OBP like he should be. He's added guys like Jose Guillen, Miguel Olivo and now Mike Jacobs, and there is a pattern: all of those hitters hit for power, and none of them get on base.
You simply have to get on base to be a good offense, but Moore seems to be struggling some with that concept.
In terms of value, it was a great deal by Moore. There is no doubt that Jacobs is a more valuable player than Nunez. But it also shows a serious flaw in the direction that this front office is moving towards.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM
The Royals ended up giving Ross Gload and his .665ops over a 100 games at first base last year. Moore has also said that they will no longer use rebuilding as a justification for a move, Jacobs assures a substantial upgrade at 1b. If Shealy and Kila step up and show they can play then that gives them a good problem with an excess of talent to fill 1b/dh as opposed to the problem they had last year trying to compete with no production out of 1b.
Posted by: cwilli | October 30, 2008 at 12:25 PM
I just don't see how anyone can complain about dealing a relief pitcher for a first baseman who hit 30 HRs. Take a look around baseball...not that many guys hit 30 HRs now that they test for steroids, and 30 is a pretty significant number now that guys aren't hitting 50.
Gload and Shealy are poor answers at first base, and Kila is a prospect that wasn't even ranked in the top 30 prior to last year.
I suspect Jose Guillen will get dealt now; it didn't take long for KC to figure out this guy is a cancer.
Posted by: Devlsh | October 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM
I don't think Guillen will get traded. You move him and you lose 20 home runs. I think he bats in front of Jacobs and gets more balls to hit.
As far as the OBP complaints - if the guy is belting homers I don't care what his OBP is...what I care about is the OBP of the guys in front of him.
People saying that the Royals 'already have 4 1st basemen' are being too kind. All of them are backups. But as of today we have a real one.
Beyond the fact that we didn't lose a whole lot is the fact that this guy will only make $3.5 million this year and the Royals have control for the next 3.
Find me a FA who swatted 30+ dingers last year and tell me how much he wants.
Posted by: Otis26 | October 30, 2008 at 01:05 PM
"As far as the OBP complaints - if the guy is belting homers I don't care what his OBP is...what I care about is the OBP of the guys in front of him."
I agree and disagree. OBP isn't as important if the slugger is hitting with people on base. However, this is where a higher AVG has to come into play. Even with the power, Jacobs gets a hit only about 25% of the time. That means those guys on base are left sitting there far too often.
"People saying that the Royals 'already have 4 1st basemen' are being too kind. All of them are backups. But as of today we have a real one."
I hardly think Kila is a back up. The guy has power, a great eye and makes contact. He is a better player than Mike Jacobs right now.
That said, I think Shealy is the guy you move. He is already 29 years old and projects to be no better than Kila from a production POV and Kila has the advantage of hitting left-handed. Either move him or keep him as a nice luxury to platoon with Jacobs.
This way, you break down the playing spots as follows:
1B: Kila
DH: Jacobs
LF: Butler
Butler was drafted as an OFer and there is no reason not to play him in LF. I realize having DeJesus in CF is less than ideal, but I think the guy has the work ethic to improve and Butler's bat is valuable. Guillen is fine in RF.
That leaves a core of offensive players as follows:
SS - Aviles
CF - DeJesus
RF - Guillen
LF - Butler
1B - Kila
DH - Jacobs
3B - Gordon
That is 7 spots filled everyday with players who can produce. Resign Grudz or stick with Callaspo, move Teahen for a cheap bullpen arm and maybe bring in a Greg Zaun-type at catcher.
With a lineup like that, KC could be the Rays of 2009.
Posted by: AA | October 30, 2008 at 01:27 PM
I think a lot of guys could hit 30 HR with a .300 OBP, but would rather hit fewer HR with a respectable OBP. You could probably find minor league free agents who can hit for power and provide no other value.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | October 30, 2008 at 01:42 PM
LOL. Settle Down Tim, I never knew it was so easy to hit 30Hrs.
Posted by: Chris | October 30, 2008 at 01:43 PM
I believe this is a very good deal for the Royals. There are plenty of horrible defensive first basemen out there. Mike Jacobs provides a really good bat for the Royals. Jacobs isnt of the same calibear of Ryan Howard or Prince Fielder but could be compared to them in some aspects. In the long run Royals win. I wouldnt be surprised to see them to make some more moves this offseason
Posted by: Angels27 | October 30, 2008 at 01:43 PM
Is Scott McClain on anyone's current roster ? He'd hit 30 HR, play the same defense as Jacobs (none), and have a higher OBP. For 2 mil less.
Doesn't every AAA team have one of those guys who just hits homers and does nothing else ?
Posted by: kinsler5 | October 30, 2008 at 02:05 PM
I didn't say it was easy, but I truly believe you could take a lot of those Quad-A guys, tell them to swing for the fences every time and give them 500 PAs, and you'd get 30 HR from a lot of them.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | October 30, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Ok 30 HR's is not that rare. How do you know his power is going to translate into the AL? I believe Nunez will have a lot more success in the NL than Jacobs will have in the AL. This trade will look much better for the Marlins. You have 30+ players in the MLB that can hit over 30 HR's easy. The Marlins are obviously trying to build for a championship this year but building a young but experienced bull pen. And Jacobs 32 HR's, .247 AVG, .320 OBP. This guy has only hit over 30 HR's once and he is 28 years old (today is his B-Day)
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | October 30, 2008 at 02:45 PM
I think a 25 year old reliever that throws 94 and can post a 2.98 ERA in the AL is a lot better than someone who hits 30 HR's , post a .320 OBP, and can only hit righties
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | October 30, 2008 at 02:51 PM
maybe not better but more **valuable**
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | October 30, 2008 at 02:52 PM
Butler isn't playing in the outfield. He was actually drafted as a 3B but was moved b/c of his defense and Alex Gordon. He was moved from the outfield because of his defense as well. He is really only passable at 1st or makes sense as a DH. I think at least one of Butler, Kila, or Shealy are on the move.
I also dont understand about all the hating on Jacobs b/c he has a lower OBP, Joe Crede has ALWAYS had a bad OBP and people love him. I know defense is a difference but at DH i think Jacobs could be a steal. His numbers should go up without worrying about his defense and being out of FLA. For the price the Royals are paying one middle reliever and $2-4 million Jacobs can be a nice pick-up. good power for a 6th hitter.
Posted by: Steveo26 | October 30, 2008 at 02:58 PM
"This guy has only hit over 30 HR's once and he is 28 years old (today is his B-Day)"
Ouch.
Probably not one of his better birthdays.
Marlins front office: Mike hey, how are you doing?
Mike: Great man! I turn 28 today!
Marlins: Yeah man, congrats, oh yeah, get the hell outa here, you're goin to KC. We just traded you for a reliever!
Mike: Crap
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 30, 2008 at 03:27 PM
Steveo, I don't know anybody that doesn't root for the Sox that loves Joe Crede. Most people think he stinks, and that he is a waste of money. Last year during the winter it was like a bash Joe Crede blog. With WhiteSox fans calling him a top 10 3B and everybody else calling him a fringe major leaguer.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 30, 2008 at 03:29 PM
"With a lineup like that, KC could be the Rays of 2009."
If you mean that KC will similarly fail in the clutch, then yes. As a Marlins fan, I'm so glad to be rid of Jake, the pop-up machine with RISP
Posted by: skronch | October 30, 2008 at 03:52 PM
"How do you know his power is going to translate into the AL?"
What makes you think the AL is the harder league for hitters? The reason it is harder for pitchers is because you don't have a easy out up 3-4 times a game in the vast majority of games. In fact, since the AL is the more breaking ball heavy league, a guy like Jacobs might actually do better there because he can probably inflate his walk numbers by seeing fewer fastballs on the corner and get a few more hanging breaking balls to hit.
"I don't know anybody that doesn't root for the Sox that loves Joe Crede. Most people think he stinks, and that he is a waste of money."
Actually, one only needs to look to the main subject of this thread to know who Crede compares to. He is essentially a right handed Mike Jacobs at a more premium position. The issue is that Crede is no longer the excellent defensive player he once was, so his value becomes even more limited.
Posted by: AA | October 30, 2008 at 04:01 PM
"Butler was drafted as an OFer and there is no reason not to play him in LF."
Well, you certainly wouldn't ever have to worry about a long term deal because he would expire of a heart attack on a hot KC summer day long before he became a free agent.
Posted by: George Purcell | October 30, 2008 at 04:08 PM
I hear that DM is in talks with Tony Batista to be the everyday 3B, is going to give Jason Smith the starting SS job, is going to go after Russel Branyan, and coax Rob Deer out of retirement so he can field an almost entire team of guys who are two true outcome players...HR's and K's.
Posted by: Slayer | October 30, 2008 at 04:36 PM
Those of you who are saying this is a bad deal for the Marlins obviously know nothing about Mike Jacobs. He can hit for sporadic power; that's it. He doesn't get on base, is a terrible situational hitter, and a God-awful fielder. Plus, the Marlins have two young up-and-coming first basemen in Gaby Sanchez and Logan Morrison, so they have no need for Jacobs. Good relievers are rare to come by in the majors; never mind 25-year old flamethrowers who can keep their ERA under 3.
Great deal for the Fish.
Posted by: m26555 | October 30, 2008 at 05:08 PM
How can you say this is a bad deal for the Royals? They need more run production. Period. Nunez was never a starting pitcher. He was a mid relief guy AT BEST. Getting 30+HR's for mid relief...great deal.
I'm aware of the logjam at 1st. I'm not sold on Kila.....yet. Good Triple A numbers don't always coorelate to the majors. (Craig Brazell anyone?) Gload will be traded, maybe Shealy too (after his great September, his value should be decent)and Butler just needs to DH.
How about getting rid of Tony Pena Jr.?? To anybody....
Posted by: robicheaux | October 30, 2008 at 05:26 PM
Jacobs had never come close to 30 HRs before, I wouldn't count on him repeating that necessarily.
What I will count on him repeating is a terrible on-base percentage, probably around the lines of his career .318 OBP.
The Royals might need run production, but they also need people on base. You can't expect Jacobs to hit 32 HR again. Reasonable expectations are 23-25 HR, and maybe a .305 OBP...
Nunez may not be amazing or have closer stuff, but I'd sure take him over Mike Jacobs if I had Kila Ka'aihue and Bully Butler already on my club.
I don't buy Ryan Shealy. I don't think anyone in baseball does...
Posted by: MorneauVP | October 30, 2008 at 06:12 PM
As for Pena Jr., you could probably get a mediocre A-Ball or AA prospect for him with so many teams needing a shortstop.
Send him to Baltimore for whatever they'll give you (it won't be much)...
Posted by: MorneauVP | October 30, 2008 at 06:14 PM
Reasonable 23-25 hr's? That would have led KC this year, we are just supposed to blow off a guy that would have led our team...
as for Kila, I'm not saying I want the kid to fail, but everyone is banking a lot on a guy with no major league at bats...
Posted by: robicheaux | October 30, 2008 at 06:57 PM
You can tell that Royals fans have never actually watched Jacobs play.
He is god awful. Just terrible. Looking up his stats and seeing 32 HRs doesn't tell you the whole story.
Everyone knows the obvious knocks against him, he can't play defense and his OBP sucks.
-To add to that, he is a horrible situational hitter. He almost never, ever moves runners over when you need him to.
-He can't hit lefties, EVER.
-He is always banged up. Always, the dude is always complaining about some sort of injury. And misses big chunks of time.
-He is a terrible base runner. He will cost you just as many runs of the basepaths as he will drive in.
-He can't hit anything off speed. He will hammer fastballs but curves and changes eat him up.
Since when do you see the Marlins make a bad trade? We got Hanley and Anibel for Beckett, we got Maybin for Cabrera. We always make good deals because we know what our players can really do. Jacobs is crap, we traded him when his value as at it's peak and got a solid RP for him.
Next year he will be back to his .230 BA/.300 OBP with 25 HRs and 70 RBI form and you guys will be begging your coach to sit him.
So glad he's gone so we can get a real 1B. Can't wait to see Logan Morrison crack the bigs in 2 years. Until then let's see how Cantu holds it down and play McPherson at 3B.
Posted by: JoeyJr09 | October 30, 2008 at 07:05 PM
I hear that DM is in talks with Tony Batista to be the everyday 3B, is going to give Jason Smith the starting SS job, is going to go after Russel Branyan, and coax Rob Deer out of retirement so he can field an almost entire team of guys who are two true outcome players...HR's and K's.
Posted by: Slayer | October 30, 2008 at 04:36 PM
you just made my night. spot on. but can jacobs catch at all?
Posted by: fgsfsfbbbrd | October 30, 2008 at 07:19 PM
Obviously Marlins fans haven't watched Nunez pitch.
The Royals traded him at the peak of his value for someone who can drive the ball which is something we've sorely missed.
Nunez had a fine season this year but coming out of spring training he was just another pitcher. I'll give you his 48 innings for 32 homers any day of the week.
Posted by: Otis26 | October 30, 2008 at 07:42 PM
Look at these pretty Situational Hitting Stats:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7623/situational;_ylt=Av5y6n0mvL1D4LQ4nH6b6aaFCLcF
Look at the Rays and what they did with their bullpen. The Marlins are building it up for a WS run. They don't need Jacobs for that.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | October 30, 2008 at 09:13 PM
Giants GM asleep at the wheel again....
While in no way a franchise savior, the post-steroids (well, mostly post steroids, LOL) era shows us that 30-HR types simply don't grow on trees like they used to. I disagree with Tim as well that he's such a worthless player. That is not accurate. In fact he's a more powerful version of Pedro Feliz, LOL. Okay, Petey has a good glove but otherwise he's a complete stiff. Comparing Mike to Petey isn't saying much, but Pete Happy now has a ring so go figure!
That Jacobs was dealt by Florida for a marginal middle reliever makes me ill, considering the Giants top 3 hitters barely topped Jacobs power output in 2008. Sorry but Sabean needs to get off his rear end and improve this team. Even if the improvements aren't monumental they need to start now and be made across the board. Giants need upgrades at 1st, 2nd, SS, 3B, LF, and RF. Did I fail to mention bullpen and the back end of the rotation. Sheesh....
Yeah Jacobs is into the first arbitration year but it's not like he will suddenly be a $10m/year player. He'll be in the $2.5 to $3m range with no guaranteed contract beyond this coming season. Hardly a big risk for the lowly Giants. For that price, a player with tons of power even when lacking in other areas (low OBP, mediocre defense, inconsistent against left handers) is still an asset as the game is played vintage 2009. Hell, if he struggles in 2009 then you non-tender or trade him. But at the cost of a very minimal talent in return the Giants need to make that trade. Jacobs could very likely have more HR's in 2009 than the club's top 3 in that category (especially if Bengie is dealt and he's hardly a slugger, just ridiculous).
I'm not preaching power at any cost. But let's face it, Gmen are drastically weak in that area and offer no threat to an opposing pitcher in terms of game-changing at bats. Even off the bench Jacobs would have been a value here. Breaking open a game with a single swing or tying one up late, you need a threat somewhere on the 25-man roster. It'd be interesting to have at least one guy who might hit more than 15 HR's. I'll say it again. When a 34yr old catcher, one never known for power and a guy that might just be on his way out at that, is the team leader in HR's, well, it's time to upgrade. Jacobs could very well repeat 30-35 even in the national park that is right field at AT&T. Don't forget the Marlins' yard is no bargain for left handed power hitters either. But once again Sabean sits meekly on his hands.
And let's not get all worked up that Jacobs would take bats from Sandoval. There are MANY MANY holes in the Giants starting 8 where Kung Fu Panda will get his playing time (3rd base and catcher are wide open especially if Bengie is dealt). At for the price Jacobs would have cost, both in terms of talent being traded and salary for 2009, he should have been acquired by San Francisco. It was low risk, medium to large reward. Typical lack of forward motion from Sabean vintage 21st century!
PS. Problem was that Jacobs at 28 was far too young. Sabean didn't give him another look as he was 10 years too young for the Giants to even consider as a free agent signee.
A 41-year old Omar Vizquel for $5.5m in 2008, what's not to like. But a 28-year old who will only earn appx. $3.0m with 30+ HR pop at a position where the Giants are inept, well, that clearly won't work. Give me a break. Even for 1 year, there is little downside. Do something you worthless XXXX of a GM.....
Posted by: YeagerFan | October 31, 2008 at 01:02 AM
Addendum:
Giants should go out and trade for Ryan Shealy. Even KC castoffs are upgrades for the wildly mediocre Giants roster. 51 years and counting.
Giants in 2028.....
Posted by: YeagerFan | October 31, 2008 at 01:07 AM