MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« White Sox Offseason Possibilities | Main | Tigers May Need To Trade Magglio »

Marlins Raise Payroll Limit To $40 Million

Mike Berardino of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel talked an industry source who says Marlins owner Jeffrey Loria has authorized a payroll of up to $40MM for 2009.  This means they won't be forced to trade any of their 16 arbitration-eligible players.  Greg Cote first suggested this on September 30th, and Buster Olney reiterated it on October 15th.

However, Berardino confirms Olney's note from Friday: Kevin Gregg, Mike Jacobs, and Scott Olsen are available.  The Marlins discussed sending Jacobs to the Royals for righty Carlos Rosa, but the Fish are worried about Rosa's August forearm soreness.  A thought: why would the Royals consider trading pitching for Jacobs?  Berardino names the Mariners and Blue Jays as other interested parties, and considers the Indians a fit.  The Giants have also been named as a suitor.

Berardino wonders if the Rangers will pursue Olsen, perhaps offering a catcher.  I don't believe Olsen would succeed in Texas.

Expected to remain in Florida: Dan Uggla, Cody Ross, and Alfredo Amezaga.  Berardino says the front office is divided on Jeremy Hermida's potential.  Four teams have asked about Hermida.  Josh Willingham may be available, but his back is worrisome.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535c53ef9970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Marlins Raise Payroll Limit To $40 Million:

Comments

"Rangers expected pursuit of Olsen" Huh ? Florida won like 2 of his last 12 road starts, can't imagine how bad he'd get hammered in Arlington.

As dumb as Jon Daniels is he probably will trade for him.

How realistic would a swap of Jacobs/Olsen be for Matt Cain?

I know the Giants have Sandoval and are resistent to trading Cain...but Jacobs is proven power and Olsen is fairly effective when he's not being a menace to society.

That would be an awesome trade. Jacobs is an awful defender and doesn't really hit for average. He kinda sucks. Olsen is good and all, but Matt Cain has been compared to Roger Clemens. The kid has amazing stuff. The Giants would want more for Cain if they were smart.

Very unrealistic. Jacobs had a terrible season even with his 30 or whatever HRs. .299 OBP at 1B? Barf.

(And since we're at comment #5 with no mention of the Yankees or Sox ... Hermida would be a sexy RF platoon partner for Nady and the exact type of young hitter Cashman should be looking at. Wonder if he's available on the cheap (IPK) or if he's still valued as a young, potential middle of the lineup bat.)

Nady hit .305 with 25 HR and almost 100 RBI. Best to platoon him? Even though he had an OPS over .800 vs both righties and lefties.

Cain is worth a lot more then those 2 especially since both are arb eligible. Think younger and cheaper and better for Cain.

Nady has heavy career splits (including a .383 OBP vs LHP to .317 vs RHP) and the Stadium encourages you to play as many lefty bats as possible, so yeah. I'm not sure I care to rely on him as more than the weakside of a platoon given the power we give up with Damon (presumably) the full-time LF.

"How realistic would a swap of Jacobs/Olsen be for Matt Cain?"

No way the Giants move Cain for that package. Jacobs offers power but he has major holes in every other part of his game, which really hurts his value.

Olsen is a solid young pitcher, but his head isn't completely screwed on straight and his peripherals from 2008 weren't too impressive, despite pitching in a good pitchers park.

And if the Yankees go out and look to make offensive additions, they'll be at first, center and possibly second base if Cano is moved. Damon and Nady have the corner OF spots all but locked up.

I personally like the Cubs for Jeremy Hermida. He'd be a cheap, but still high ceiling option that cost likely be had for a reasonable amount. Hermida for Sean Marshall and Wellington Castillo? Maybe the Cubs throw in Veal or something. It'd probably take more but I don't know how Hermida is regarded anymore.

wow a whole 40mm...now they can keep a few arb guys.

I'm not sure why the Jays would be listed as a suitor for Jacobs. That woudl mean they would need to move Overbay, and if they were to do that, wouldn't they drop Lind onto first base?

I'm not opposed to picking up Jacobs, but it has to make sense.

"It'd probably take more but I don't know how Hermida is regarded anymore."

Wouldn't it be fun to know this sort of thing?

Jacobs and Olsen don't land you Sanchez much less Cain.

When people offer trades with the Giants, why do they always offer pitching? Giants need OFFENSE, not pitching!

55saveslives is correct; that package won't get the Fish Sanchez let alone Cain, and the Giants have no need for pitching in return except a solid middle reliever. If the Marlins now have the payroll to keep all their arb-eligible players, the pieces the Giants would benefit from aren't available any longer and a deal between the teams is not likely.

The Giants will look elsewhere for suitors that can help them fill their infield needs.

Giants fan, Buck? Wondering if there's been any revival of the Matsui to SF talk in the Bay area. If Cashman is looking to get younger, that would be a quick way to do so.

Kinsler,

I agree that Olsen is not the same pitcher away from Florida, but I do like his WHIP and the Rangers always need lefties in their ballpark. If the price is two years of Gerald Laird, I think I make that deal.

Well if the Rangers could land Olsen for Laird, no doubt I do that deal.

Laird is solid but his upside is limited and he's only under control two years.

Olsen has his issues but is still a 24 year old lefty who pitched pretty well this year and has good stuff. The Rangers can use a guy like that him at that price

NJM, yes, a Giants fan who travels a little within the industry for a day job.

I saw the mention last week about the Yanks' purported interest in a Rowand-for-Matsui swap, and the dismissal of this by some of my fellow Giants fans. From the little bit I've heard on my last East Coast trip over the weekend, I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss this however.

Moving Rowand's salary and allowing Lewis to move over to CF for a Matsui/Schierholtz platoon in LF has greater short-term benefits for the Giants than the status quo. I'd leave Winn in RF because of his defense at AT&T. But would the Yanks and Matsui even do it?

I'd hope the Giants at least dip their toes into the Rowand possibility amongst their salary-moving discussions this offseason, because I'd rather do that instead of moving Winn and Molina, who still have good value to the team in 2009 and can possibly yield picks after the season. Unloading Rowand's long-term salary committment also changes their approach to other FAs this offseason.

Joe-

Zero chance of Matsui...

Too many OFs already and no way to get rid of Dave Roberts or Rowands contract

(I beg people not to say "zero chance" or "I guarantee this will happen". If we could have signatures on here, that would be in mine.)

Thanks, Buck. I figured Matsui still makes sense both as a lefty bat and from a marketing standpoint. Rowand is gross; I'd much rather take a straight salary dump with a blah reliever like Taschner coming back or something but I guess even Rowand for Matsui straight up helps in the short run as his bad defense in CF beats Damon's horror show.

Hey Buck,

If we could trade Rowand (Which I'd be ok with) Winn would probably go back to CF. Lewis defense in CF would be horrible.

Joe -

Ok, 99.99999999999999% NO WAY Matsui comes.

Rowand
Winn
Roberts
Lewis
Schierholtz
Bowker

Where do Giants fit Matsui? Also, he is a year older and coming off a sub-par, injury season.

And the Giants are getting YOUNGER. The "old" Giants jokes can be put to rest. Matsui is not a good fit for this team.

I'm sure the new Mariners GM's first plan would be to overpay to the Marlins for a prototypical power first baseman, only the guy can't get on base.

I'm sure our first plan was to look at Mike Jacobs and go, "Yup, we need that sub-.300 OBP"

I'm sure the first thing that the Mariners new GM thought of was Mike Jacobs, a sub-300 OBP player who can't draw a walk even with a shotgun pointed to the back of his head telling him to "take a pitch!"

Dumb speculation. Just because the team has a hole, doesn't mean it is logical...

I'm not a giants fan so i dont see much of them on the East Coast... but as an owner of Matt Cain two straight years...

Is there anything to be said about Sanchez and Zito having higher win totals than Cain, despite vastly inferior peripheral stats?

What happened during Cain's starts??

Could be random, could be Cain matching up with better starters.

55:

Agreed that the Giants' outfield situation is already crowded and that the team is trying to get younger. But the issue at hand was the wisdom of taking back Matsui for a far shorter period of time in order to unload 4 years and $48 million of Rowand. As for Lewis versus Winn in CF, do you harm the team more moving Winn out of RF or putting Lewis in CF. Good question. Alternately, the G's could move Winn to CF, and let a Roberts/Schierholtz platoon handle RF until 2009 and leave Lewis in LF.

at4:

I'd be interested to see what kind of run support Sanchez and Zito had in 2008 compared to Cain. And I also think that NJM as a point in that Cain may be matching up against other teams' better starters than Zito and Sanchez.

Why would the Indians be a fit for Jacobs? The last thing the Tribe needs is another 1B/DH type.

Hafner
VMart
Garko
LaPorta
Mills
Could even make an argument for Peralta

Point is, unless the Tribe really like Jacobs, I dont see the fit.

If the Giants could move Rowand for Matsui that would be a great move.

Rowand's contract is awful, his defense has been in decline for years, and he's basically the hitter he was this year.

Moving him for a shorter contract, higher upside guy like Matsui would be brilliant. Rowand and his contract are just gonna get worse. The Giants could move Lewis to center and have Matsui and Schierholtz getting time in left. And they could still move Winn who should at least have a little value.

As much as I can't stand the thought of Damon in CF, I think an OF of Damon-Rowand-Nady on a $200MM team is borderline insulting to the fanbase. I guess the only bright side is that Rowand would shut up all the writers who think a lack of grittiness and leadership and that stuff (rather than the pitching and Posada injuries) are what submarined the 2008 team.

Too bad Rowand sucks and things like grit, scrap and hustle have been proven to be near worthless.

Agreed. Very, very agreed. I was grasping for a positive.

55saveslives - I think it depends a lot on how well Lewis’ bunion surgery goes. Both if Sabean would do it And who plays C.F. if Rowand is moved. Lewis would not necessarily be worse the Marvin Benard was out there and it would increase his value. Of coarse some one would have to nail Roberts to the bench so he would not be written into the starting line up 4+ days a week.

As for the swap in genreal: I actually like the idea. The Giants gain a lot a payroll and roster flexibility. It would mean the only over 30 Vets on the roster next December would be 2 pitchers. And who ever Sabean might bring in this winter as a role player.

I can't even imagine how Sabean justified giving that contract to Rowand in the first place. The guy's numbers in Philly were clearly a creation of the ballpark, and realistically he's nothing more than a fringe average hitter that plays fringe average CF defense. His, as Keith Law likes to say, "scrappiness" makes him seem like a better defender, but realistically those catches wouldn't have to be made spectacularly if he was able to get to them quicker in the first place.

The Florida Marlins are the Los Angeles Clippers of baseball and Jeffery Loria the Donald Sterling

"I'm not sure I care to rely on him as more than the weakside of a platoon given the power we give up with Damon (presumably) the full-time LF."

It is not as if Damon is a slouch in the power department. The guy is an virtual lock for 15 HR and 20 2B, plus all the bases added with his speed.

Nady is fine as an everyday player. He is kind of like a right handed Paul O'Neill, both at the plate and in the field. Not a bad thing to have, unless you Yankee fans have a short memory.

Our memories are quite strong, we just have far better ability to correlate players I guess. Seriously, what about Nady reminds you of O'Neill? Look at Nady's career, aside from a huge 1st half last year, the guy has never been more than a nice occasional power source. O'Neill was a pure hitter/OBP type that Pinella mind-F'd into trying to hit HRs, sort of the exact opposite skill set. Really, aside from "Yankee", "RF", and "not a star by 29", what is there? How many dozens of OFs would fit that profile if they simply donned pinstripes? If Nady becomes the next O'Neill, we'd all be thrilled (and I'd have to add another guy to my O'Neill/Messier pantheon), but to link those two at this point is beyond silly.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.