MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Peavy Rumors: Friday | Main | Blue Jays Rumors: Burnett, Manny, Ryan »

Preliminary Talks For Markakis Extension

Steve Melewski of MASN Online spoke to Orioles president Andy MacPhail, who said he's had preliminary contract extension talks with Nick Markakis' agent.  Dollar figures have not yet been exchanged.  MacPhail added that there are no hard feelings from Markakis' renewal last year.  Locking up Markakis is an offseason priority for the Orioles.  They'll try to buy out all three arbitration years as well as some free agent years.

In March, players such as Prince Fielder, Cole Hamels, and Markakis were renewed at $700K or less.  Fielder and Hamels publicly expressed displeasure.   Young players who may be renewed next March include Hunter Pence, James Loney, Yunel Escobar, Jeremy Guthrie, Joba Chamberlain, and Tim Lincecum.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535bc664b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Preliminary Talks For Markakis Extension:

Comments

caN someone explain renewed?

N. Markakis to renewed 09


z


arod13

No idea what the second comment means.

Anyway renewing a player is when the team sets his salary as they see fit since he is not yet arb-eligible. Usually they throw young stars a bone by giving a few extra hundred thousands.

Tim, put yourself in Brian Sabean and Bill Neukom's shoes next spring. Your Number One pitcher may have just won the Cy Young, and yet his dad wants to stay away from doing what Cain did and instead wants to go year-to-year with the Giants.

So the question is this: how high do you go with a renewal amount for Lincecum to keep him and dad from feeling disrespected while not pissing off the other teams for going too high? Or should you even care about pissing off the other teams after your guy just won the Cy Young, when you've got him under control for another several years, and want to have a long-term relationship with him?

$1 million?

$2 million?

$3 million?

How about instead of trading Cain like everybody talks about, you trade Lincecum, his whiney dad, and his frail body and collect an enormous bounty. If I was Sabean I would be trying to move Lincecum for a huge package right now. I know, I know, SI says his delivery is perfect and blah blah blah, but he is going to hurt himselfooner rather then later. Mark it down.

It is also interesting that Lincecum has been rocked by good offensive teams. Colorado, Milwaukee, NYM, and Philadelphia have just had their way with him. It drives me insane to hear people call this guy a top 5 pitcher in the league. And to say he is better then Cole Hamels or Jamie Shields or even Chad Billingsley. I am not sure he is better then other really good young pitchers. I know this guy is a good pitcher, I just don't see what makes him that much more special then other young pitchers. He just seems so hyped up that he almost has to be overated. Sell him high. Do it. Let the nrmax88 bashing commence.

In 109 innings of ball against Milwaukee, Colorado, NYM, and the Phillies, Lincecum has given up 57 earned runs, 46 walks and 105 hits. The only good offensive team has has had success against is the Cubs, probably because of their heavily RHB lineup. Just found it interesting. He has had almost all of his success in the NL West.

Regardless of what has been written I think the Giants will lock up Lincecum this winter. 5 years/$32M with a team option year or two perhaps.

OMG Pujols went 0-4 one day. I don't know why they say he's soooo good. 0-4 is like a zero avg.

the nrmax88 bashing need not commence because ill-informed wackos are better off ignored.

Shields, Billingsley and Hamels to a lesser extent all have similar statistics if not worse when it comes to facing good teams. That is what makes them good teams. He also has not pitched enough innings against teams outside of the NL west to make stats significant.

Lincecum's 2008 ERA against the rest of the National League outside of the NL West: 2.61

Did someone really compare Pujols going 0-4 vs Lincecum pitching 109 innings?

Here you go:

Pujols career AB's - 4578 / the 0-4 example would constitute 0.087% of Albert's total AB's

Lincecum career IP - 373 / the 109 IP example would constitute 29% of Lincecum's total innings pitched

I wouldn't consider 30% of a players performance irrelevant. While I don't completely agree with nrmax88 on Lincecum's future, his point is still valid.

Finally, I'm in the minority by saying that both Lincecum and Cain should be moved after this season. Let someone else deal with Lincecum and the arb process. If Howard got $10m in his first time isn't reasonable that Tim could get a figure like that as well?

"Did someone really compare Pujols going 0-4 vs Lincecum pitching 109 innings?"

Your taking things to literally, I did not make that statement, but saying he was not good against 4 teams which in his career he has pitched an average of 25 innings against is not making a case. Also conveniently leaving out teams like Stl and the Cubs as well because his stats don't help your argument does not add credibility.

Also say against Mil he has had two starts one he goes 9 innings and gives up no runs and one where he goes 5 and gives up 7 runs (goes 0-4). As a whole his stats will look bad.

You absolutely don't trade Lincecum until he has 1-2 years left until FA. He is the fact of the Giants franchise. Bonds is gone. Zito sucks. Unless the deal is absolutely knock-an-intelligent-GM's-socks off (not Brian Sabean's), he shouldn't be traded.

How many starts has Lincecum had against the Mets and Brewers this year? A grand total of two. He dominated the Phillies, btw.

Lincecum's overall 2007 stats (he was a mid-season callup) weren't ace-caliber anyway, so take that with a grain of salt.

with lincecum, i agree a trade is a good idea. toward the end of the yr, u could even say the dodgers offense was pretty good and the only time he faced them this whole yr was against the 2nd stringers trying to get on the playoff roster

Since we're having fun here bj, if you support moving both of them now, what in your mind could the Giants possibly get back for both that would make it worth undoing the rotation for the next 2-3 seasons?

Renewing a young player still in arbitration means signing him to a contract that freezes his arbitration figure at an agreed on rate. It also usually means buying out a year or more of his first free agent years, usually around age 27-30 when most players hit FA.

You might ask why would a young promising future star do such a thing as locking in his rate at a lower figure? The primary reason is that players in arbitration are essentially playing from contract-to-contract, and one bad slump or two can seriously impact his future rate. Also there is always a real risk of health or other unexpected things that can hurt or stop a player's performance. So, the player is basically saying, I'll make a tradeoff of risk for stability.

Bill James rated Markakis as #10 in his list of "Top 25 Players Under Age 30." For those of us who have seen him play in person, he deserves that biling. I am not sure if he gets the Gold GLove but he deserves it. That arm is a pitcher's arm, and, not just any pitchers' arm. He must be throwing 95+ mph strikes to home.

I saw Markakis do BP several times and everytime I've seen him, he hits nearly ever ball out. But not only that, he hits every ball out to right in a row, then to center, then to left. In other words, he is practicing swings to hit for power to specific fields. He's not just trying to make contact. The last time I saw that kind of control in BP it was Edgar Martinez. It's unbeliavable. But anyone who's ever seen him play in person in a game will know his biggest feature is his eye. He had excellent strikezone in the minors, and Day 1 in the majors, and it hasn't changed since. His rising OBP reflects that.

Buck Henry--- I know your post wasn't directed at me, but I'll take a shot.

A Lincecum haul will be a good amount bigger than a potential Peavy haul will be, since Lincecum doesn't have the injury history and will be MUCH cheaper over the next 4 years than Peavy.

I'm at a blank. This isn't easy.

I'm staying away from trading cornerstone type players, like Pujols and Longoria.


I could see Lincecum to the Orioles for a package with Wieters as the centerpiece, with Wieters then flipped for a HUGE haul of position player prospects.

Lincecum for Ian Kinsler, maybe add a prospect to one side of the deal.

Basemonkey I don't understand your post, when I say renewing I mean pre-arbitration players. Players are arb-eligible after (usually) three seasons.

Anyway, with Lincecum...generally the idea of goodwill by playing a player more than you need to pre-arb has gotten the team nothing. For instance the $900K given to Ryan Howard didn't result in a future discount. So I would just give Lincecum $500-600K.

Tim is right ^^^^ Historically speaking, goodwill or treating a player "right" does not buy a team a discount usually. It can happen sometimes but there's a lot of other different factors involved, and, those players eventually regret such decisions. In general teams are better off thinking in their own interests, and, the player thinking of their own.

I'm not saying Lincecum is bad. I just don't think he is better (or worse in some cases) then guys like Cole Hamels, Edinson Volquez, James Shields, Jon Lester, Chad Billingsley, Joba Chamberlain, Jair Jurrjens and other really good young pitchers. He pitches in a great park to pitch in, and with the exception of the Rockies in Colorado, and the Dodgers for the last 2 months of 2008, a division of teams who can't hit. That, combined with his insane value right now, his small frame and violent delivery (yes, it is violent, I don't care what the scientists say. You can see violence in his delivery. The Scientists also say curveballs are an optical illusion, and aren't really curving), and the fact that his arb numbers could be through the roof, why not put his name out there and see what you can get? What if Texas offers you Feliz, Andrus, and 2 other top prospects? The Giants also have Alderson and Bumgarner coming, along with Cain and and Sanchez already in the rotation. They could fill two or three of their massive holes with high quality talent by moving Lincecum. If you could fill some needs with can't miss type prospects at multiple positions, it may be worth it. Lincecum is probably the single best trade chip in baseball right now, and while he is good, I don't know whether that should be the case. The Giants could capitalize on this bigtime.

cwilli.... I left out the Cards because I don't consider their offense to be that good. It was better in 08, but I don't consider their offense on the level of the cubs, Mets, Phils, or Brewers. I didn't leave the Cubs out. I said the Cubs were the one exception to what I was saying, though that could be because the Cubs are so right handed loaded.

Lets just say that you could get Heyward, Schafer, and Escobar for Lowry and Lincecum or something like that. Maybe they throw in Prado too. Sign CC Sabathia. In 2011, you can have a core of CC, Cain, Sanchez, Bumgarner, Alderson, Posey, Villalona, Sandoval, Schafer, Heyward and Escobar, all uner 30 (besides CC).

1B Villalona
2B Prado/ Burriss/ Velez
SS Escobar
3B Sandoval?
LF Heyward
CF Schafer
RF Lewis
C Posey

SP CC
SP Cain
SP Sanchez
SP Alderson
SP Bumgarner

Is a pretty sick core of a team. This could potentially be a pretty cheap team for a couple of years also.

Whether the Braves (or any other team) make a deal like that or not is another question, but some people would say that is a fair trade, and it addresses a bunch of different holes for the Giants. I just don't think trading Lincecum should be out of the question.

The Lincecum trade speculation is absurd. People have zero grip on reality if they think that he is worth a "little" more than Peavy, and are you kidding nrmax88 by saying Lincecum and Lowry?

Let me know the last time a 24 year old SP who is about to win the Cy Young, and has the potential to sustain his success was traded?

Nobody is saying he is going to be traded just talking hypothetical trades.

nrmax88: So you don't think the Cards offense is as good as the Cubs, Mets, Phils, or Brewers? That's odd...the Cards ranked 4th in the NL in runs (ahead of MIL), first in hits, second in total bases, 4th in RBI (ahead of MIL), first in batting average, second in OBP, and third in SLG. So the stats say that the Cards are in deed one of the top teams offensively...actually they are better than the Mets and Brewers when you get down to it.

nrmax88,

I can see the point you are trying to make but you have to think this is really his first full year. He will get better against those teams. I think that even if you can't pitch well consistantly against 3 out of 16 teams it is excuseable for your first year.

This Lincecum trade talk is ridiculous. Seriously. Lincecum is young and still relatively cheap. He is not close to free agency, and he plays for a team with a good budget. Why in the world would the Giants trade their best homegrown pitcher in a decade (perhaps more)?

In the case of Lincecum (or Markakis), or players like them, until further notice we should regard Lincecum as a Giant for life. If Lincecum does end up on another team, it means he's had an unexpected turn of ineffectiveness or health that makes him a liability, which invariably makes him less coveted than what all of the posters here hold for him.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.