![]() |
|
|
| |
« Tigers Considering Alex Cora | Main | K-Rod Expected To Sign After Meetings »
6:19pm: It sounds like Sabathia's agent Greg Genske is shutting things down for the weekend. He didn't reveal anything new to Brewers GM Doug Melvin. Adam McCalvy also notes that the Brewers will offer Sabathia arbitration, a procedural move.
12:49pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman talked to Yankees people who believe the Angels leaked interest in Sabathia to reduce Tex's demands. Those people also believe the Halos will limit their offer to the $100-120MM range. Other factors: Tex makes more sense for the Angels, Arte Moreno loves him, and signing Sabathia could reduce the chances of extending John Lackey.
Nonetheless, Heyman agrees with a rival executive that the Angels are quite serious about Sabathia.
8:51am: The big news yesterday was the L.A. Times report stating that the Angels "are in discussions with C.C. Sabathia and could offer him a contract that approaches the $140 million bid extended to him by the Yankees."
Ken Davidoff wrote this morning that the Yankees are reluctant to raise their offer to Sabathia, even if it means he signs with the Halos. Davidoff says the Yanks would step up their efforts for A.J. Burnett and Derek Lowe if they lose Sabathia.
Meanwhile Dan Graziano says Yankees officials scoffed at the idea of the Angels turning their attention to Sabathia. Those officials believe it's a ploy to get Mark Teixeira to drop his demands. Danny Knobler, however, believes the Angels have already moved on from Teixeira. He says the Angels have long-term concerns about Tex's knee.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536248597970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference C.C. Sabathia Rumors: Wednesday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Damn... this offseason has barely started and it's already quite the soap opera. The yanks want CC, the angels want Tex. To get Tex the angels will try to woo CC. If they can't get CC the yanks want Tex. Meanwhile the Sox are courting Tex who is goo friends with Tek who may be spurned by the Sox. It sounds like a sappy high school drama.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 26, 2008 at 08:58 AM
Saw this happening. As much as I like CC, I don't like the Angels giving this much to any pitcher.
Most likely, I can see them go after Burrell and/or Adam Dunn if they don't get Tex. Not exactly the idea scenario, but you hvae to look at bargain shopping during the holidays.
Tim and staff: Have a great Thanksgiving Holiday. You guys do a fantastic job!
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 08:58 AM
CC, Lackey, Santana, Saunders, Weaver, Escobar; great rotation.
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | November 26, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Agreed Purple. I know teams and FA's are posturing and reviewing deals, but signing for this off-season has been relatively quiet.
I even remember Torii Hunter signing the day after Thanksgiving. This was already after a flurry of activity this time last year. Man, watching this go down is like Christmas eve, but without knowing what the date is. Someone sign already!!! LOL
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 09:04 AM
Being an Angels fan, no doubt great rotation. However, I am concerned with 2010 when both Lackey and Vladdy are both FA. Depending who they are able to sign this year, difficult decisions will have to be made next year...no doubt.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Also saw this happening. As a Yankee fan, i'd like to just forget about Sabathia and let him sign with the Angels, who don't even need him. The Yankees then go ahead and sign Tex right away if at all possible. If I were Cashman and I couldn't get Sabathia, i'd try talking to Towers and working out some kind of trade for Peavy. Aj Burnett is not an ace, he's a #2 starter. Lowe is not an ace either. Hopefully Cashman knows what he's doing. Hope this isn't going to be a dissappointing offseason for us Yankee fans.
Posted by: Spieg7 | November 26, 2008 at 09:13 AM
RSD,
Get a new screen name. Your team has never had a dynasty. You guys have never won more then 3 in a row, try 5 in a row. Also it's not like the red sox's have a great rotation. Don't forget the yankees missed the playoffs by 8 games, if wang did not go down we would have beat you guys.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 26, 2008 at 09:13 AM
Spieg7,
I agree with you. lets just sign Tex, then trade for Jake Peavy and then maybe sign Ben Sheets.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 26, 2008 at 09:15 AM
tbone88 don't dismay, the year Vlad and Lackey are FA's there will be more FA's to go after. Maybe someone like Holiday. And I really feel the Halos will be able to lock up Lackey! I have complete confidence in the Angles management. So if they can't sign Tex bring on CC.
Posted by: dchillis | November 26, 2008 at 09:15 AM
I dont see Tex lowering his demands, Why would He? he has many suitors willing to pay the big bucks like Boston. As for pretending to like C.C. in order to get Tex, thats the biggest load of crap ive ever heard. Teams dont offer 140 million to pitchers as a bluff
Posted by: Reality Check | November 26, 2008 at 09:15 AM
"CC, Lackey, Santana, Saunders, Weaver, Escobar; great rotation."
That would undoubtably be the best starting rotation in baseball... Jered Weaver as your 5th man is ridiculous. Is Escobar ready to start at the beginning of next year? However, I'd think the Angels would be better off going all in on Tex instead. Vladdy has 1 year left and needs a successor and the Angels run differential last year suggests despite an awesome pitching staff they were lucky to be doing that well. The big reason the Angels lost to the Red Sox in the playoffs: their starting staff was only slightly better but even with Tex, on paper they were hopelessly outgunned offensively. Overall it gave the Sox the advantage. Point being, the Angels don't need another ace... they need Tex.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 26, 2008 at 09:16 AM
As a Sox fan I give thanks that my team is so well run that I can relax and enjoy Thanksgiving and Christmas knowing that I will be watching my team play in October. I feel bad for Evil Empire fans as free agent desperation and anxiety set in. As if the economy wasn't bad enough in the Bronx!
Red Sux Dynasty?? LOL!!! Yeah, if call winning twice in 90 YEARS a dynasty...knock yourself out Sparky.
NEWSFLASH - The Sox are as much of a "dynasty" as the MARLINS!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 26, 2008 at 09:19 AM
The Yanks made the playoffs for 13 straight yrs before 08. Dont worry about the Yankees chances of playing in Oct. -they have a better chance than just about any team.
Posted by: drcgull | November 26, 2008 at 09:20 AM
yanks, I know where you're going with this. Would've could've should've with Wang.
I'd look at it this way....Red Sox has scoreboard for now, but Yankees have scoreboard throughout the game.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 09:20 AM
yanks12025, please don't bait the child, we'll all lose an extra few seconds of precious time scrolling past his pointless rants (I wonder if he'll call me barney again this time). Think of it like dealing with a child who's throwing a tantrum in the super market. Do you buy him the candy bar or just ignore him?
Oh for historical reference, technically the Red Sox had one of the first dynasties in baseball.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | November 26, 2008 at 09:23 AM
I just don't get the Yanks fans that would rather have JP than CC. Peavy dominated in the NL West at Petco - I still believe he'd be a good #1 starter anywhere, but not necessarily as dominant. CC, on the other hand, has done it both in the AL and NL. Furthermore, scouts say JP is a career-ending elbow surgery waiting to happen with his flawed and highly irregular mechanics/motion (I'm not saying his ability is flawed, just his mechanics are VERY injury prone), whereas there is no reason to suspect CC will break down other than "he's big" and "he's thrown a lot of innings in the last 2 seasons." I have yet to see statistical evidence that that matters. Plus, you'd have to give JP CCesque money to sign him in addition to three major league ready young players you'd give to SD.
I'm also not sure this offseason is slower than others - I can't remember exactly the timeline of last year, but I'm sure most of the big names hadn't moved by now. Even if this year is a bit slower, that's to be expected as it's full of all-star FA's looking to break the record books. Each one of them is biding their time to drive the market up. In that way I take neither CC nor Tex's non-actions so far as a signal as who'll wind up with them.
Long time reader, first time post. Thanks for everything Tim.
Posted by: cdg02001 | November 26, 2008 at 09:27 AM
actually the rays have scoreboard-
the great red sox finished 2nd and got eliminated from the playoffs -they are not the champs of the AL
Posted by: drcgull | November 26, 2008 at 09:27 AM
I would guess the sticking point for the Angels (and anyone else) with Tex is not the AAV, but the 10 years that Boras says he wants.
I like Dunn a lot, but I am not sure if he could fit for the Angels as an alternative. They have Vlad in RF and he is not too mobile as it is anymore. Can they DH Dunn? He really needs to go soemwhere he can DH and spend a little time in the OF....not many of those spots open on teams with cash to burn.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 09:29 AM
NO FAT PITCHERS!
Let the Yankees, who are so good at signing pitches right before they break down, have him!!!
I want my MTV!
(Manny, Tex, Vladdy)
Posted by: Scott | November 26, 2008 at 09:31 AM
I just like the approach the Yanks are taking here. A lot of people thought they were going to go desperate after this. I just wish they don’t sign AJ. The guy is not even a # 2, check his stats form previous season. Rather have Sheets on a 2yr contract and maybe trade for Peavey and bring Pettitte back. Like I said before, the Angels don’t need CC and if there were to sign him, they wouldn’t have much of an offence if Vlad gets hurt.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 26, 2008 at 09:34 AM
what makes Yankees fans think that Peavy will come there?
A rotation of:
Wang
Burnett
Lowe
Chamberlain
Hughes or Pettitte
I don't know if that's enough to get the Yanks past the Rays and Red Sox even with Teix in their lineup and that's assuming they get both Burnett and Lowe which isn't guarantee by any stretch.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 09:35 AM
cdg - good points. As a Yankee fan I can say that I would prefer CC to JP based on abilities, ceiling and left-handedness. That said, if you had to rank the top pitchers available I would say CC, JP (not a FA, but available) and then you move to Sheets (injury-risk), Burnett (injury-risk/head case) and Lowe (age/5+ ERA last time in AL East). I have not heard any of the concern about JP's motion and think he is fairly durable; clearly not as good as CC, but better than all of the other options.
So if you need to come away with 2 pitchers you need to have all sorts of scenarios in case you don't get CC, or the Padres want too much for JP/won't wave NTC/wants too much additional $, Sheets wants to many years, Burnett won't take 4 years or Lowe wants too much $.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 09:36 AM
cdg: Slower in terms of signings. News and rumors have been plentiful, but the egos...uhh, I mean posturing is just that. Part of the process I know.
drcgull: Scoreboard meaning championships which the Rays don't have.
CMM: I wouldn't put Dunn in LF. I would sign him to either DH or play 1B. Dunn is adequate at 1B, but just plain terrible at LF. I would envision if the Angels chase Burrell, it would be for DH. Ideally, I could see Reagins attempting to sign both if Tex or even CC does not become available.
Of course, this all goes down if they don't get Tex.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 09:41 AM
See that plan to make teix drop his offers would work... if teix didn't get offers from the sox yankees and other teams. But as it looks at least the Red Sox will throw in a bid for him and so will the Orioles and the Nationals. I dont think teix has enuf california love to lower his demands to stay with the angels. However, I don't see why the angels would waste that money on CC when Vlad's contract is almost up and they have alot of potential to resign teixiera. They already have a great rotation (when healthy) and with vlad teix figgins ect, the angels have a very potent offense mixed well with power, speed and just plain damn good hitting.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 26, 2008 at 09:47 AM
Huge CC fan here.. I've completely come to terms that the Indians won't even attempt to sign him but I would think even more highly of him if he did not take the Yankee's offer.
Posted by: GoTribe | November 26, 2008 at 09:49 AM
RSD: Is there some economic downfall going on in the Bronx that I don't know about? I don't think the Stenibrenner's are strapped for cash or anything sir. Why do you spend so much time on a Yankee post when you have nothing good to contribute?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 09:54 AM
What are we, 12? Seriously, grow up guys.
And the Yanks officials are "scoffed" at the Angels for being interested in the best available starting pitcher on the market? How dare those Angels try to get better! How dare they show interest in the same player the mighty Yankees want! Give me a break.
Posted by: Papelboner | November 26, 2008 at 09:55 AM
GoTribe
I agree with you that the indians wont even attempt to sign him. However, as a baseball fan, I wish he'd accept the offer the yankees put up. Not only do I want him as a Yankee (because I don't think his body will hold up for 6-7 years of power pitching and he threw alot of innings the past few seasons), I want him to accept the offer to get the ball rolling on names like teixiera. It seems like there is a stalemate going on with people waiting for sabathia to make up his mind before they decide what to do about lowe, burnett and teix.
Also if the yanks sign cc there is no chance that they will go after teix as well which would be a huge sigh of relief. A-rod may not be a great big game player, but he and teix back to back scare the living hell outta me (that might be worse than manny/ortiz). Also, Burnett will get his 5 years (though its a dumb decision) somewhere, so I dont see the yanks as in the cards for him anymore as they have said no to 5 years already. Lowe, it would break my heart to see him a yankee, but if it must be it must be and it wouldn't be the end of the world.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 26, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Santana/Beckett FTW: I believe there is a consensus about Adam Dunn that he is not a clubhouse guy and has an attitude in the locker room. This is probably the reason why we haven't heard his name in signings as of yet.
Granted his OBP and power is great, but his contact is terrible...there are still some GM's that would attempt to pursue his services, but would rather chase the bigger prize in Tex.
If I were teams pursuing Tex, I would definitely try to leverage Dunn to sign and play 1B.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 09:57 AM
And yes, the bronx is strapped for cash. Steinbrenner has spent over 1.6 billion just on players/staff without a world series ring and he just dropped quite a pretty penny on the new stadium (though the state of new york covered a nice chunk). Believe me, steinbrenner is not a happy camper right now. hes down over 2 billion dollars with no rings on his fingers.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 26, 2008 at 09:58 AM
Its funny how many people expect the Rays to repeat what they did
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 26, 2008 at 09:59 AM
I think the rays are going to be a dominant team for a few years, till they firesale. but yea next year they should still be very good especially considering that the owner has said he wants to spend some money this offseason from what i understand. I'm not expecting a teixiera type of player, but yea 1/2/3 in the AL east is hard to pick for next year (especially without knowing who the Yankees end up with and if the Red Sox go in on Teixiera).
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 26, 2008 at 10:03 AM
4/5 sorry
4. toronto
5. baltimore
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | November 26, 2008 at 10:03 AM
If the Angels (or any other AL team) are looking at Burrell as a DH, I would absolutely look at Dunn first. He is younger, has more power, walks more and will cost less per year on a shorter contract. I would think Dunn for the next 3 years will be far more productive offensively than Pat The Bat and cost 25% less.
I think the whole clubhouse thing about Dunn is a bad rap and not true. Guys who have played with him have never said anything bad about him and if an unhappy Dunn can hit 40 hr's with a .380 obp, I wouldn't be knocking him in the papers.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Yeah I remember how Detroit was supposed to be a dominant team for year to come with their pitching, and let’s not even talk how they were going to win the WS after their trade for Cabrera. How about the Indians and the White Sox when the won the WS.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 26, 2008 at 10:11 AM
yanks 09
option
1. J. Peavy
2. B. Sheets
3. M. Ramirez
4. M. Teixeira
without
1. C. Sabathia
2. A. Burnett
3. D. Lowe
2 pitchers/2 hitters
z
Posted by: arod13 | November 26, 2008 at 10:11 AM
CMM: Completely agree. I know GM's want to sign the prize FA, but they don't believe in bargain shopping anymore? I believe Dunn's agent may have been quoted to say they he was willing to play 1B upon contract discussions.
I have friends who are hardcore Reds season ticket holders that have echoed this and were happy he was dealt. Of course, that doesn't represent the entire Reds fanbase, but perhaps you are right.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Its funny how many people expect the Rays to repeat what they did
Its funny how the Yankees fans just assume they'll make the playoffs because they'll throw hundreds of millions of dollars around.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 10:18 AM
philsWSchamps-
No. We expect to make the playoffs because the Yankees field a great team every year.
Our team doesn't have the luxury of playing in the NL.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 10:21 AM
"What are we, 12? Seriously, grow up guys.
And the Yanks officials are "scoffed" at the Angels for being interested in the best available starting pitcher on the market? How dare those Angels try to get better! How dare they show interest in the same player the mighty Yankees want! Give me a break".
This coming from the Snapperhead that calls himself "Papleboner".
In your clueless rant, you neglected to realize one thing....the Angels already have the best rotation in MLB and have 5 starters under contract. They have ZERO use for spending 140 mill on another pitcher. THAT is why the Yankees scoffed. It would be like if the Yankees said they were making a play in a 3B that the Sox were interested in. Wouldn't make sense.
"what makes Yankees fans think that Peavy will come there"?
Because he already SAID he would. He's friends with Jeets and Nady...and although he strongly prefers the NL, if it had to be the AL, the Yankees would be on a short list.
Do anyone of you actually watch baseball or do you just troll on here to sling insults? Do us Yankees fans a favor and go back to the Harry Potter board where you obviously belong.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM
arod13,
what makes you think Peavy wants to play for the Yankees. And what makes you think the Yankees can get a deal there. What are the yankees giving up for Peavy and don't start with Kennedy and Cabrera because they're filler to the Padres. What about NO TRADE CLAUSE do you not understand???
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Clueless wonder that is philsWSchamps....read above you for your answer.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 26, 2008 at 10:27 AM
jjyankeesfan2,
nice. as the braves and cubs will tell you a deal isn't as easy as you posting your wishes on a message board. If you're going to start another we'll give you Cabrera and Kennedy campaign, don't bother. The Braves offered Escobar, Hansen and Flowers and it was turned down.
I doubt the Yankees have the prospects for it. It'd start with Chamberlin and then you'd have to say no way.
But keep up the insults, I enjoy it, I really do.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Furthermore....if you're a Phillies fans...why are you on the Yankees thread every day slinging insults and making an azz of yourself, when you clearly know ZERO about the team, it's farm system or it's fans? Go to a Phills thread and celebrate with your OWN fellow fans!!! Your city just won it's first title since 83'!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 26, 2008 at 10:34 AM
philsWSchamps-
Why wouldn't the Yankees be able to get a deal? Are you implying that the do not have the pieces? I'm sure if the Yankees absolutely wanted Peavy, they would be able to get him. Personally, I would rather not have him.
I would like the Yankees to sign Sheets regardless of CC signing or not. I think he is high risk but higher upside than anyone else out there. With that being said, if neither happens, I am actually content with Hughes and Kennedy. You have to give them a chance before you toss them aside, just too small of a sample size so far. Also, I would like to see Pavano back on a low salary, one year deal. I think he be a serviceable end of the rotation guy.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM
As I already mentioned, it's obvious you clearly know ZIP about the Yankees farm system...so why would I even bother to toss out hypothetical deals? I don't waste my time entertaining TROLLS. Let's just say this...Cash and Towers are good friends...the Yankees have PLENTY of arms to offer in the farm...and the Pads also are said to have lots of interest in Swisher. They HAVE the chips to get a deal for Peavy done if they wished to...and in case you missed it, the Braves are sick of dealing with the Pads and the Cubs have no more use for Peavy.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 26, 2008 at 10:37 AM
Our team doesn't have the luxury of playing in the NL.
You know 3536,
its a shame that we could handle the rays no problem and you guys ended up in third behind them. Some of you Yankees fans need to realize its not your God given right to win your division every year.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM
philsWSchamps-
Joba has a higher upside than anyone the Braves offered. Why should the Yankees have to offer him? They have the pieces to get it done without him. And without Phil for that matter. But I would rather keep the prospects then trade for Peavy.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 10:40 AM
35-36
I agree with you on Sheets. Can't imagine why they aren't discussing him for say, 3/45 but love Burnett for 4/60? Both are injury risks, but when healthy, Sheets is the better pitcher.
As for the Hughes, Kennedy and Pavano? Hughes may be in the rotation but I can't see any way whatsoever that Kennedy and Pavano are. Pavano has stolen enough money and Kennedy's attitude (not lack of talent) has called his cab out of NY.
Have a good day Yankees fans~
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | November 26, 2008 at 10:42 AM
JP is not going to bring as much back as people think. Haren is not a comparable deal because he was cheaper. JP's below-market deal only works if he doesn't force his option to be picked-up.
Therefore, Towers should get the best offers from the NL and the Cubs are out now and the Braves have moved on. Unless the Braves come back, Towers may be forced to look to an AL team and the Yankees are on JP's list. The Yankees can say, since we have to pick-up the option year we won't give you back as much. If they are the only option (JP MUST be moved with all the drama that has played out and sooner than later so the Padres can make plans for their '09 roster) they now have more leverage than the Braves had. keep in mind, the Braves could be doing this for more leverage, but historically when they have said they are moving on they have moved on.
Towers has handled the JP situation very badly. Padres fans must lower their expectations of what they are going to get back or they are going to be very unhappy when JP is traded. Whoever gets JP is going to get a deal on him at this point.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 10:45 AM
philsWSchamp-
I would be surprised if the Phillies win the division next year.
And if you don't believe that the NL is a weaker league than you are delusional.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 10:45 AM
BTW, if Swisher is moved it won't be to the Padres becasue they want to clear payroll. Swisher would be moved in a separate deal to bring back a prospect to be used in a hypothetical JP deal.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 10:48 AM
philsWSchamp-
I understand that it's not our God given right to win our division every year. But do we, as fans, expect it. Of course we do. I would say the same goes for the Red Sox. When you are constantly producing great teams, you expect to win.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Joba has a higher upside than anyone the Braves offered. Why should the Yankees have to offer him? They have the pieces to get it done without him. And without Phil for that matter. But I would rather keep the prospects then trade for Peavy.
Agreed about Joba's upside compared to either other offer but if the Padres said no to Wren and Hendry what makes any Yankee fan think that the buddies of "Towers and Cash" will strike a deal with an assumed lesser offer of unproven Yankee farm players. For 2007's NL Cy Young winner they can't take less than major league ready talent and then some. And as i said if i were the Yanks i don't make that deal. But again that leaves the yanks with the 3rd best SP in the division.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM
3536,
agreed about the leagues.
And the Mets have been saying for 2 straight years they'll win the NL East and they just can't seem to do it.
Our core is entering their prime and we have young kids coming up to supplement that (Donald, Marson and Carrasco).
I dont' see us going away anytime soon.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM
The Padres told the Yankees a Jake Peavy deal could happen and they would not have to include Phil Hughes.
Posted by: GeneralManager | November 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM
philsWSchamps-
Well, considering Towers has kind of pissed all over himself, he probably won't receive face value for Peavy.
Anyways, the Yankees have the pieces to get it done, without Joba or Phil. Right now, Peavy is not their target, but if something along the way falters then logic says they would shift towards Peavy.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"As a Sox fan I give thanks that my team is so well run that I can relax and enjoy Thanksgiving and Christmas knowing that I will be watching my team play in October. I feel bad for Evil Empire fans as free agent desperation and anxiety set in. As if the economy wasn't bad enough in the Bronx!"
RSD, I have to say that as a Cub fan I used to root for the Red Sox, they were like the Cubs of the AL to me. Now that they've won it's A-Holes like you that have turned me off of the Sox. You're way too arrogant, smug, demeaning. You'd think your team has won 26 championships or something. You think you're guaranteed to be playing in October next year? Remember that you guys didn't even beat out the Rays this year, and the Yankees are getting ready to lay down some heavy cash to improve a team that won 89 games in '08. Go ahead and gloat if you want, but remember that while you rest on your laurels everyone else is getting better, and with a few well placed injuries next year and the Red Sox could be battling the Orioles for last place in '09. You're not immune. Basically, quit being a smug a-hole and try offering something constructive to the forum.
Posted by: pageian | November 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM
phils - I think that it is clear that the AL is the stronger league top-to-bottom, but I am a firm believer in the best team always wins and the Phillies deserved to win this year. They won when they needed to and they should be excited by what they did.
It is very hard to repeat, so it will be interesting to see what the Phils do with Burrell and Moyer and the other decisions they have to make for '09 and beyond.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 11:08 AM
RSD - Seriously, guy, try to grow up...even just a little bit would go a long way.
Posted by: CMM | November 26, 2008 at 11:17 AM
3536,
agreed about Towers but he didn't have much of a position of strength to deal with considering his owners divorce and the fact that everyone knows they're in complete sell mode.
That also could mean that the Braves or Cubs could have a shot too. I honestly think he goes nowhere this year because that franchise will be screwed if he gets so far less than face value for Peavy.
CMM,
agreed the AL is clearly better. That's not even a debate. And while its hard to repeat we have a pretty strong core and aren't losing anyone that isn't replaceable. IF ownership spent some $$$ they made from the WS run we could go get Manny for 3/75 until Michael Taylor is ready in the outfield. I don't doubt that for a time, Charlie could keep his "son" in order. If we do that and Moyer returns I don't see any reason why we can't make it back to the playoffs and then anything can happen.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 11:21 AM
ESPN reported yesterday that Sweet Lou said the Cubs are no longer interested in Peavy. If that is true, then the Padres options are really starting to get limited.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 26, 2008 at 12:16 PM
I said it yesterday, if they give 20+ mil to CC, Lackey its going to want the same kind of deal. You would be looking at 45+ for 3 players with Vlad.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | November 26, 2008 at 01:02 PM
You know what would be awesome? If a bunch of people sat around making fun of someones username as opposed to the completely accurate and valid point he made.
The MFY desperately need to go out and drop major cash on free agent acquisitions to try and compete again, the Red Sox do not. For us it is a luxury not a necessity.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 26, 2008 at 01:06 PM
If i were the angels i would rather have tex. He's the big bat theve needed behind vlad in the order for years, and plus they have a pretty solid rotation with saunders, santana, lackey as it is.
Posted by: jimbo77 | November 26, 2008 at 01:07 PM
"ESPN reported yesterday that Sweet Lou said the Cubs are no longer interested in Peavy. If that is true, then the Padres options are really starting to get limited. "
Is the Padres payroll so limited that they just can't hang onto him until they get a good offer? It's not like he's a FA following '09.
(perhaps it is that limited though)
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 26, 2008 at 01:17 PM
It is crucial for the Angels to sign Tex for the following reasons:
1. He will be no doubt the face of the franchise for the next 5-7 years
2. Vladdy is not getting any younger and regression may be setting in.
3. Since Vladdy is a FA in 2010, will the Angels be able to afford him, along with Lackey?
Granted, the Reagins and the Angels have been proactive with free agency (win some, lose some), but the prices of elite free agents will continue to rise, even though disparity will begin to set with 2nd tier FA and below.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 01:31 PM
CubbyFan
I would think of course, that keeping him is one of their options, but from everything I have read Towers really wants to move the salary.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | November 26, 2008 at 01:32 PM
the sox will get tex so end this yanks angels orioles and nats bullshit
Posted by: RMB915 | November 26, 2008 at 01:37 PM
no matter what happens, Peavy can't be moved traded without at least close to equivalent value to wherever he goes. I think he stays. Heck get rid of Giles first. Don't trade away the only one (other than A Gonzalez) who puts fannies in the seats.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 01:38 PM
The sox's dont need him. So why would they pay him 200 million for someone they dont need. I see them making Tex an offer but i think the yankees and angels will beat them. The yankees need him more then the red sox's, so do the angels.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 26, 2008 at 01:46 PM
ArodSucksAtLife-
While it is true that the Red Sox can sit still and the Yankees seemingly need to spend, you have to look at the context of it. How many players are the Red Sox losing compared to the Yankees? The Yankees have positions that need to be filled and have plenty of money to do it.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 01:48 PM
The ultimate in baseball truths.
YOU CAN NEVER HAVE TOO MUCH PITCHING
Posted by: BK | November 26, 2008 at 01:49 PM
The Rays will compete next year in the AL east b/c they have the best rotation.
Kazmir
Shields
Garza
Price
Sonnstine
That is a better rotation than any combination that the Red Sox and yankees could come up with. The Rays also have a lineup with Upton, Longoria, Pena, and Crawford and play the best all around defense in baseball.
Posted by: Steveo26 | November 26, 2008 at 01:55 PM
3536: I dont get what you are saying? Redsox are simply in a better posistion b/c they had the foresight to not have major holes like the Yankees do. Both teams have plenty of money to spend (albiet the yankees have more) but the thing is the Red Sox only really need a catcher beyond that maybe a 5th starter and a backup outfielder. The Yankees need a #1 and #3 starter, firstbaseman and possibly a back up catcher and centerfielder.
Posted by: Steveo26 | November 26, 2008 at 02:02 PM
Well. I ignored the name game, and argued with facts, instead of just random tangents. But since RED SOX DYNASTY! wants to talk about then let us do so.
First. RED SOX DYNASTY! Your name is factually inaccurate.
Second. ArodSucksAtLife. I like how is fashionable to hate A-Rod. Why, yes sir, A-Rod most definitely suck at life. He will only likely go down as the Home Run King, and one of the greatest baseball players ever. Not to mention the all the millions of dollars he has. Yep. A-Rod's life equals EPIC FAIL. Also, way to make yourself look ridiculous by agreeing with anything RED SOX DYNASTY! has to say. He is a troll that knows little to nothing about the game we all know and love. IMO RED SOX DYNASTY! sucks at life.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Steveo26-
I was replying to a comment about how the Yankees had to spend money while the Red Sox did not have to. I did not say they were in a better position. I was just explaining that the Yankees have more holes to fill do to more players departing the 2008 team. While the Red Sox have few departing players.
Posted by: Thirty5Thirty6 | November 26, 2008 at 02:13 PM
the red sox have a dynasty? lol. far from it...
Posted by: TheKiid | November 26, 2008 at 02:26 PM
I'd take his on the field performance at 30 million over Mike Lowell at 13 all day everyday. It is sucks at life, not at baseball.
His own teams fans hate his guts, make up bs arguments that he is "unclutch" his life plays out in the tabloids and he left his wife and children for a zombie that slightly resembles Madonna. There have been stories that he has to go to sports psychologists to get over the fact that he is unloved. The dude sucks at life.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 26, 2008 at 03:23 PM
and you making your handle arodsucksatlife, makes you that much better at life, hahah nice.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 26, 2008 at 03:32 PM
CC wants to pitch in SF. He was talking in the media last year about how much he likes the city. I bet if the G-Men make an offer even close to competitive, CC is ours. How about Lincecum, Sabbathia, Cain, and Zito and a starting 4. Pretty fierce....except for Zito maybe :-)
Posted by: SFnative | November 26, 2008 at 03:47 PM
With the state of the nl west what it is the giants could sign cc and manny and probably make a run to the playoffs with cc lincecum and cain at the top of the rotation.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 26, 2008 at 04:00 PM
I think the Yanks should go ahead and offer Pettite a one year deal for 13 mil and an option. When the music stops I would hate to see the Yanks w/o CC, Burnett and Pettite. We should sign Pettite and if we can get CC and one of the other starting pitchers then so be it. We can never have too many starting pitchers and if we end up having to deal someone for another need then so be it. I would rather not trade Hughes however because we would be selling low. I also would want Joba as a starter.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 04:12 PM
The Yankees NEED Teixeira more than the Angels do. The Yankees defense is horrid. Horrid defense makes pitchers look worse than they really are, conversely, good defense makes even mediocre pitchers look more effective. The Yankees are better off going after Teixeira and getting one of Lowe/Burnett than they are going after CC.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 26, 2008 at 06:18 PM
"Its funny how many people expect the Rays to repeat what they did"
Why won't they? They're not losing any major players to free agency, besides Cliff Floyd (who's production they can replace). Crawford had a down year (and injury issues) and could easily rebound. Upton has crazy upside, and also spent time injured last year. Price is a rookie, but I'd think that he'd be able to at least match what Edwin Jackson provided last year (assuming Jackson is traded).
The AL East is very much a three team legrace, and it will be difficult to pick any one team to be a clear-cut frontrunner.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 26, 2008 at 06:23 PM
Ortiz is already on record as saying the Red Sox need another 30 hr hitter. If that doesn't scream Tiexiera I don't know what does. Personally, I think Theo is already en route to Tex's house for Thanksgiving.
Posted by: SierraM | November 26, 2008 at 06:28 PM
"Boston is not interested in Sabathia, they would just like to see anybody but the Yankees get him. In fact, I'm not even sure the Red Sox are all that interested in Tex. How are they going to trade Lowell until he proves he's healthy, and he's got a no trade clause."
No need to trade Lowell even if the Sox do sign tex until Lowell proves he is healthy, the sox have fairly deep pockets and why not have a bat/glove combo like that all year round on the bench anyway if lowell would be willing to settle for 300 or so at bats? He is a major improvement over Sean casey whom was the 1st base only reserve last season and they could use Youk as a reverse of just swinging back to 1st and rest tex (if signed) or rest ortiz. I'd take Lowell's bat and GG caliber defense any day, as would many sox fans and only make a trade when/if the right offer is made, much like with Crisp.
Good point on the Rays, those guys are smart and I have a feeling that they are going to let the rest of the league bid on the highest dollar bats and relievers and only THEN swoop in and find another henske and percivel type bargain bin that will just add to the phenominal team that they fielded this past season. I have an eye on henske maybe coming back again as well in a lesser role as last season and maybe Cordero as the reliever.
Posted by: johns | November 26, 2008 at 07:07 PM
"And the Yanks officials are "scoffed" at the Angels for being interested in the best available starting pitcher on the market? How dare those Angels try to get better! How dare they show interest in the same player the mighty Yankees want! Give me a break."
Well, the Angels absolutely dominate the Yankees, so I can understand why the Yankees would whine.
"1. He will be no doubt the face of the franchise for the next 5-7 years"
Actually, that is the big problem Tex has. As good as he is, and he is that, he has not shown a proclivity toward being particularly marketable. He is sort of like a Rafael Palmeiro in this way. Tons of talent, tons of on-field value, not so much value off.
"2. Vladdy is not getting any younger and regression may be setting in."
Ugh. People need to get over this. Players who are "regressing" don't have second halves like Vlad did. Further, I don't think most people realize he is as young as he is. Vlad will only be 33 next season. There is no reason to believe that he wont produce until he is at least 36, if not older.
"3. Since Vladdy is a FA in 2010, will the Angels be able to afford him, along with Lackey?"
Of course they will. It is unlikely that Vlad will want more than $20 million a year, and will probably settle for just a touch more than Hunter is paid (Hunter is currently the highest paid OFer in baseball). I can see the Angels doing a Peavy-esque deal for Lackey, which would fit really nicely into the budget and allow for at least one more big ticket guy in the lineup.
Posted by: AA | November 26, 2008 at 07:16 PM
People need to get over this assumption that they can only get CC OR tex. There's no reason they can't get both and a 2nd pitcher as well.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 08:22 PM
melonrix wrote:
The Yankees NEED Teixeira more than the Angels do. The Yankees defense is horrid. Horrid defense makes pitchers look worse than they really are, conversely, good defense makes even mediocre pitchers look more effective. The Yankees are better off going after Teixeira and getting one of Lowe/Burnett than they are going after CC.
___________________________
I agree that the Yanks need to add another bat to replace the offense lost from Abreu and Giambi but let's not mistake that Tex is and should be the Angels biggest need. They have pitching but if you look at their numbers Vlad led in rbis with 91. In adddition to losing Tex's production they may also lose Anderson's and Rivera's rbi production as well (150 rbis combinaed). And with Vlad going into his option year next year (15 mil) they may or may not decide to pick him up for another year and would be in an even worse situation next offseason.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 08:35 PM
The AL East is very much a three team legrace, and it will be difficult to pick any one team to be a clear-cut frontrunner.
Melonis Rex,
great point and I will add that the team with the LEAST pressure on them is the Tampa Bay Rays. Smallest payroll, no one expects a repeat. Let's see how the Yanks and Sox respond. Should be fun to watch. If they could get a solid closer, they're the team to beat.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 08:41 PM
philschamps wrote:
what makes you think Peavy wants to play for the Yankees. And what makes you think the Yankees can get a deal there. What are the yankees giving up for Peavy and don't start with Kennedy and Cabrera because they're filler to the Padres. What about NO TRADE CLAUSE do you not understand???
____________________________
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/2008/11/03/2008-11-03_jake_peavy_puts_yanks_on_trade_list_as_p.html
The Padres ace, who is expected to be one of the biggest names on the trade market this winter - and could be moved during this week's general managers meetings - has added the Yankees to the list of teams that he would accept a trade to, Padres general manager Kevin Towers told reporters Monday.
Peavy has identified at least five National League teams - the Braves, Astros, Dodgers, Cardinals and Cubs, and while Atlanta is believed to be his top choice, all of them appear to be higher on Peavy's list than the Yankees.
______________________
phils:
stop being so arrogant and quick to think that you know it all. Towers mentioned that Peavy was open to going to the Yanks 3 weeks ago.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 08:45 PM
I will say however, that I doubt the Yanks would be willing to give up what is neccesary for the Padres to agree. I'm sure Cano is on their list because of his salary. My guess is they would want Hughes, Jackson, Melcanon and Montero/Romine in any deal.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 08:47 PM
that should have read that Cano IS NOT on the Padres list..
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 08:48 PM
AA:
1. Playing in Texas and Balitmore did not making him marketable. That is where the comparison ends if Tex signs with the Halos.
2. Have you looked at Vladdy stats lately? First of all, he is starting to incur the injury prone label. Second, If you look at 140 games plus per year average:
2008 stats:
85 runs scored; 4th year in a row that he has failed to score over 100.
164 hits; lowest since 2003 when he played 112 games for the Expos.
31 doubles; 14 less than last year
27 home runs; second year in a row at 27. He hasn't since 40 during his current tenure with the Angels.
91 RBI; the first time under 100 since 2003.
77 strikeouts; the most since 2001.
.303 BA; The lowest BA in his career over 112+ games.
For a player of Vlad's character, even with the injuries, he is regressing.
Depending who is signed this year, Vladdy and Lackey will command top dollar no doubt.
If you remember the 2002 World Series year, the Angels lost money even winning the title and the roster didn't have $20 mil salaries.
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 08:49 PM
A player with a $20 mil salary that is....
Posted by: tbone88 | November 26, 2008 at 08:51 PM
YanksFanSince78,
Ok, I admit i was 100% wrong about Peavy. he may be willing to come to the Bronx. Again as you stated doesn't mean he'll come there. If I'm a Yankees fan I've got to be shiatting bricks about my rotation this coming year. With Mussina retiring, Pettite a question mark about returning, Wang coming back from injury, that's a lot of question marks. They'd be better off just offering CC 180 million now and ending it all. Then giving Lowe and Burnett a 5% stake in YES to come to the Bronx. If not, as stated before you have the third best rotation in the AL East. And before another one says it, I know the Phils benefit from playing in the NL, but you know what, I DON'T CARE.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 26, 2008 at 09:29 PM
YFS78- I'm not saying Teixeira shouldn't be the Angels' first priority. The Angels need him. However, if the Yankees were to go all-out in the Teixeira bidding, as they should, and have CC secondary, I could easily see the Yanks winning that one. Teixeira will improve the Yankees more than CC will due to his defensive prowess.
So many pitchers look better than they actually are b/c of infield defense. Brad Ziegler would be an example (hell, almost all of the A's pitching staff would work), as would Edwin Jackson and Dan Wheeler, as would Kyle Kendrick (although he really crashed late season), etc.
Keeping Lackey is HUGE for the Angels, and I think the Angels will hold on to Vlad after 2009.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 26, 2008 at 10:12 PM
philsWSchamps-
"Should be fun to watch. If they could get a solid closer, they're the team to beat."
I'd disagree on the closer thing. I'd rather just give Balfour the closer role, anoint Howell the 8th inning guy, and focus on getting another lefty for the pen. Affeldt would've been perfect, but he's gone. Fuentes might be out of range (Rays should focus on the OF/DH bat, not RP).
I was puzzled by the Rays letting Miller walk though. Any Rays fan want to give me insight on what the potential plan is there, (unless there's an injury to Miller that only the FO knows about).
Posted by: melonis rex | November 26, 2008 at 10:23 PM
melonix:
I disagree. Look at last years world series. The Phils won basically wone off the strength of one dominant pitcher in Hamels (4-0 post-season). Look at the Sucks in 07 (Beckett 4-0 post-season). The Cardinals in 06 (Carpenter 3-1), White Sox (Garcia 3-0 and Schilling 3-1). Every team needs a stud pitcher in a short series. CC has had a bad post season run but I'd take my chance with him because I think he's got the best stuff out and can dominate. The Yanks have a very good pitcher in Wang but he's not that dominant power ace that can go head to head with Beckett or Kazmir.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 26, 2008 at 10:56 PM