MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« C.C. Sabathia Rumors: Thursday | Main | Which Team Will Sign Rafael Furcal? »

Fuentes' Price A Bit High For Mets?

According to Adam Rubin of the New York Daily News, Brian Fuentes' agent told the Mets he's looking for three years and $10-11MM per.  The article headline says this demand "rocks" Omar Minaya, but the body of the article just says Minaya finds it "a bit high."  It's hard to imagine the Mets being surprised by Fuentes' asking price, as most fans could've guessed it.  Earlier reports actually had Fuentes asking for more.

Rubin says the Mets will negotiate on parallel tracks for Fuentes and Francisco Rodriguez, content to sign either closer.

Other minor news: Minaya confirmed interest in Raul Ibanez, and will talk with Scott Boras at the winter meetings to determine Oliver Perez's asking price.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536273f73970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fuentes' Price A Bit High For Mets?:

Comments

The mets need to resign Ollie...They arent getting any of those other SPs.

I have a feeling whoever isn't signed by the Mets will wind up back on their original club. Nobody besides the Mets will come close to their asking prices.

mkorpal, I think that knowing the Mets are the only large market team really looking for a Closer is why Minaya is looking to catch a bargain in this market (Compared to the normal going rate of Closers).

The Mets realize the supply is greater then the demand and is going to pressure them into seeing who budges first.

I'd rather see k-rod than fuentes.

I also want nothing to do with Ollie for next year and just treasure the first round pick.

Then I'd say trade Ryan Church for Edwin Jackson and sign Juan Rivera to replace Church. After that trade for Street then sign a cheap low-risk high-reward like Penny or Colon to fight for the 5th spot with Neise. Basically I'd say this free agent class is not worth 1st round draft picks with Type A free agents.

Man I wish I was average at my job and could demand 10-11 million a year.

I too would prefer Francisco Rodriguez. It is never a good idea to not go for the best because of potential risk/injury. Look at the Yankees last year they were afraid to give up prospects because they thought Santana's arm would fall off. They didnt get him and as of now they are desperate for pitching because of this and their decision really isnt woorking as of the current moment. They could have had a rotation of Santana, Sabathia (possibly), Wang, and Joba! Oh well at least the Mets got him... anyway to prove my point we need KRod he is a legit closer much better than Fuentes and he is also much younger. Adding a player of Rodriguez's caliber who be almost as tremendous an offseason move as getting Johan was last year.

Happy Thanksgiving!

I thought Fuentes was expecting 3 years, 39 million? If he offered himself to the Mets for 3 years, 30-33 million, that's pretty good

1. I would rather have K-Rod anyway than Fuentes.

2. Rual Ibanez may not be a great fit. I mean how many left hand hitters can he have in our lineup. It would make it much easier for opposing teams to attack our lefty heavy lineup.

3. I'm starting to think we should resign Oliver. He pitched better under Warthren and i dont think were guna end up with anyone like Lowe

"Then I'd say trade Ryan Church for Edwin Jackson"

The Rays could do better than Church for Edwin Jackson.

Jackson has good stuff, is only 25, and has been steadily improving over the past 3-4 years.

Ryan Church is a fine RF, but he's already 30, and has a pretty big platoon split (from 2006 to 2008: .865 OPS vs. righties, but just a .699 OPS vs. lefties).

The Rays would assuredly be able to land a better outfielder than Church, considering that Jackson holds more value.

One idea could be Edwin Jackson and Akinori Iwamura for Jermaine Dye and Chris Getz.

The Rays get a big hitting RF/DH to solidify their lineup as well as a potential replacement for Iwamura at second. The hole could also be filled by guys like Willy Aybar and maybe Reid Brignac.

The White Sox get a solid young starter to fill out the rotation and a solid 2B/3B option that would fit nicely into the top of their batting order.

The Rays may be giving up a tad much, but that deal would really help both teams. The White Sox may want more high upside talent for Dye, and the Rays may want more long term value if they're making a hole at second as well.

I don't understand everyone's infatuation with K-Rod. His peripherals have been declining almost yearly, and last year's rate of 1-2-3 saves is scary. If Fuentes can be had, and Street acquired for the price of Heilman and Feliciano, I say go for it. You'd have two relievers at the back of the bullpen with closing experience. And if the Mets are really concerned about giving up Feliciano, sign Beimel.

Seriously, K-Rod? His stats were terrible last year, and have been steadily declining.

Jimbo, while I agree with being a bit heavy on lefties with ibanez, If sabathia and perez go to the AL the NL will be pretty weak as far as good left handed pitching. It will still be tougher to attack that than a team that is overly right handed.

Didn't the Brewers offer Cordero 4/$40 last season?I'd think 3/$30 for Fuentes would be a bargin.

CTC, I can't speak for anyone else but my infatuation with K Rod is mostly because he's 26, not 33, and because he hasn't recently lost his job to Manny Corpas.

Rodriguez has publicly stated that he's deliberately evolving (or devolving depending on your viewpoint) from a thrower into a pitcher. I want to believe him. Time will tell.

BJ Ryan is head and shoulders better than Fuentes and on a 2/20 deal. One wonders if they have been talking to the Jays about a potential deal.

Yeah I'd also like to throw out there that Minaya is pretty much a moron for turning down a Heilman/Feliciano for Street swap. Feliciano is a fine reliever, but he'll already be 32 and there isn't much upside left there. Heilman also has a good arm and has shown the ability to be a good reliever, but he'll already be 30 and is running out of team control.

Street on the other hand is just 25 and despite showing some signs of decline in 2008, he's still been a very good reliever for four seasons. A 2.88 ERA, 78% save percentage, and a 271/78 K/BB ratio in 269 innings is pretty damn good.

People say this guy is just an overhyped middle reliever, but his performance clearly shows he's better than that. Even if he's lost a little off of his stuff, a move to the NL as well as a change of scenary could help to get Street back on track as one of the best closers in baseball.

If you can land a guy who's just 25, is pretty cheap, and has the upside of Street, and it only costs you two age 30+ relievers, you make that deal. I realize that the Mets need depth in their bullpen, but what they need even more is consistent relivers who can strike out both lefties and righties. Street doesn't have a clear platoon split, and his effectiveness against batters from both sides of the plate would be huge for the Mets if they slid him into a set up role.

"As a Mets fan I wouldn't trade Church for Edwin Jackson. I'm guessing you're a Rays fan by your delusions of grandeur? Look at the empirical evidence; when have the Rays ever took on a contract like that in a trade? Dye is not going to the Rays, forget it right now."

Uhh.. Cubs fan buddy..

Can you explain to me why you would prefer 30 year old platoon RF Ryan Church over 25 year old potential #3 Edwin Jackson?

And Jermaine Dye's contract is only for one season. The Rays just made the World Series, presumably they'll have a tad more payroll to play around with. They have a lot of their guys signed pretty cheap other than Crawford, Pena and Kazmir, and Dye is pretty much a perfect fit for that lineup.

And either way I clarified that it wasn't necessarily a deal either team would jump to do.

Jeez you really are like RSD and Guru

"Oh yeah...F-Rod's stats were so horrible last year...ONLY THE SINGLE BEST SEASON EVER BY A RELIEVER!! Yeah, what a bum. Who wants that guy that Saves 62 games in a season...give me a frigon break, do you hear yourself?"

You just said K-Rod had the greatest season ever by a reliever BECAUSE OF SAVES?!? Do you hear yourself? Saves are a completely contextual stat that doesn't do a very great job of reflecting the quality of a relievers performance. Rodriguez got 69 save chances in 2008. You could've gotten Aaron Heilman to get 50 saves with that many chances.

Gravediggerhebbner.... okay, so K-Rod must be intentionally throwing slower because he said so himself! What do you want him to say?

Reporter: K'Rod, what has happened to your velocity?

k'Rod: Well, my arm is killing me, my stuff has deteriorated, I have lost 4-5 mph on my fastball (although everybody says that I do it for more location, my location has gotten progressively worse.), my changeup has gained velocity, my slider isn't a dominant pitch anymore, but don't worry about me, it is all intentional, me throwing my heat slower, throwing my changeup harder, and throwing my slider less effectively are all parts of my gameplan. And oh yeah, I also purposely increased my walk and hit rates every year.

Kherub, for such a cocky, arrogant tool who seems to be so sure of himself and know so much about baseball, it is pretty pathetic you are using saves to try to show K-Rods value. Single best season ever by a relief pitcher? Hardly. There really wan't anything that impressive at all about K'Rod this year, other then he got a lot of save opportunities. People never seem to care about any stats that matter. If you want to go by simply 2008 numbers, Fuentes was a lot better for my money then K'Rod was, and I think a lot of other people would agree.

By the way, I said it in another post. Feliciano can go where ever, I couldln't care less. But I would prefer to keep Heilman then to trade him for Street. All Huston Street is is a name. I like Heilman's durability, versatility, and even stuff better then Street. And Street is coming off a down year just like Aaron. Not to the same degree, but I don't know what is the infatuation with Huston Street.

"a move to the NL as well as a change of scenary could help to get Street back on track as one of the best closers in baseball."

I would argue that moving from pitching in Oakland in the AL West is an easier task then pitching in NY, facing the Braves, Phillies and Marlins, all who are as dangerous if not more then AL West offenses.

"what do you think about Rays sending Carl Crawford w/Jackson for Dye and Bobby Jenks? Palehouse do need speed and Rays could use a closer."

If I was KW I would do this deal before Friedman even finished saying Jenks' name.

Dye is a great hitter but he's getting old and his defense is very poor now. Jenks is still a good closer but his stuff has been declining some despite being only 27, and I think Williams would be smart to sell high on him now while he still has good value.

Crawford is basically a definition of what the White Sox. They need a young, speedy CF who can hit at the top of the lineup. Crawford is the best defensive LF in the game, but he's still very good in center, and would offer the White Sox everything they would need on offense. Plus the White Sox would be able to afford resigning him after 2009. If KW could make that deal I would be freaking ecstatic, which is why it won't happen.

As for the bashing of Huston Street, I'd like to just throw the other side out there:

He was pitching great as recently as 2007, when he had a 63/12 K/BB ratio in 50 innings, posted a 2.88 ERA and a .94 WHIP. You simply don't post those kind of numbers in the AL by accident. Clearly, there has been a slight decline in Street's stuff, but he also had been coming off of some injuries, and he's still young and very talented.

I think it's almost getting to the point where Street is becoming undervalued. I'm not saying you should deal a bunch of good players for him, but if the deal is him for two age 30+ relievers, I make that deal.

nrmax,

if it works here's the link to the article in which K-Rod "proves" his point.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081114&content_id=3680031&vkey=hotstove2008&fext=.jsp

"Seriously, K-Rod? His stats were terrible last year, and have been steadily declining."

Yes, K-Rod is a little overrated, but he isn't terrible. 2.24 ERA? 62 saves? More K's than innings, AND only 26 years old. Scott Schoeneweis,Luis Vizcaino, idk just examples, those guys are terrible. K-Rod is hardly terrible. God forbid the guy is only very, very good instead of great. Not many teams have great, I'd settle for a guy with the numbers and personality of K-Rod

"Yes, K-Rod is a little overrated, but he isn't terrible. 2.24 ERA? 62 saves? More K's than innings, AND only 26 years old. Scott Schoeneweis,Luis Vizcaino, idk just examples, those guys are terrible. K-Rod is hardly terrible. God forbid the guy is only very, very good instead of great. Not many teams have great, I'd settle for a guy with the numbers and personality of K-Rod"

The question was never, is K-Rod a good closer? We can all agree that Francisco Rodriguez is a good closer. The real question is whether or not signing him as a free agent would be a good value, considering his likely price?

Rodriguez is expecting to be paid like a top 3 closer in all of baseball, when his performance indicates he's more of a top 10 closer. The real issue is that he would likely end up very overpaid soon, although he would likely do a fine job.

RSD, yeah we're good I have no issues.

That kherub guy though, he needs to get a clue.

I understand, but someone called him terrible, I really don't see how he's terrible in any way. With the Mets, he'd likely save 40 games a year. And since they're a big market team who clearly has closer as their biggest need, if they have to go to top 3 money to lock him up, I'd be OK with that, 'cause once K-Rod is off the table, the next best option is Fuentes, who as recently as last year lost his job to a rookie. That's what I'm saying. THey can afford it; if it's 4 years, 52-56 mil for K-Rod, then they've gotta do it

Gravedigger.... yes, K'Rods agent telling the Mets to go back and watch one at-bat over the course of 162 games definitely has me convinced. What do you expect K'Rod's agent too say? He is clearly declining and obviously not worth his asking price? That is hardly "proof".

Why do you always bring up Fuentes losing his job to Corpas? Should I bring up K'Rod whining over a called ball, and then letting a throw from the catcher roll past him to let Jason Kendall comes home and lose the game? How about the fact he has gotten rocked two post seasons in a row?

"I understand, but someone called him terrible, I really don't see how he's terrible in any way. With the Mets, he'd likely save 40 games a year. And since they're a big market team who clearly has closer as their biggest need, if they have to go to top 3 money to lock him up, I'd be OK with that, 'cause once K-Rod is off the table, the next best option is Fuentes, who as recently as last year lost his job to a rookie. That's what I'm saying. THey can afford it; if it's 4 years, 52-56 mil for K-Rod, then they've gotta do it"

See I agree that the Mets might as well lock him up if the price isn't out of reason, but I wouldn't want to give him that fourth year. He'll already be 30 and he's showing clear signs of physical decline at the young age of 26 already. I'd be willing to give Rodriguez like 3/42 though.

k-rod would be the best fit because of his age, post season experience and ability to flourish under the spotlight in a big market town. Remember how Mets fans loved Turk Wendell for his bean bag slam? Fans will go crazy over k-rod's emotions and he will thrive.

And I do believe that there is a difference between being a thrower and pitcher even if it means losing velocity. No one complained about Santana's velocity drop when he pitched a complete game shutout at the end of the season, and his lowest ERA of his career despite only throwing in the low-mid 90s.

nrmax88, Yes you should bring up whatever you believe supports your argument. No holds barred.

I am aware that my position holds has a much weaker foundation that one based on science and mathematics. I am also aware that science and mathematics do not put on uniforms and take the field.

I have noted your past pronouncement that you "hope the Mets sign KRod so that you can say 'I told you so.'" Please add my name to your 'I told you so' list, and Happy Thanksgiving to you and all mlbtr contributors.

my apologies for the lack of clear language, that should read:

"I am aware that my position has a much weaker foundation than..."

Believe me, like Santana, who I wanted nothing to do with(I would still love to be able to get rid of that contract, I know, I know, won't happen), I will root for K-Rod as hard as I can if he is in Queens next year. I will hope beyond hope that I was wrong about him. I would never root for the Mets to lose so I could say "Ha, I was right, I told you!" I just don't think a K-Rod signing would end well. Happy Turkey Day you and your as well.

Starters to closers = Apples to Oranges.

@ enut ^

"I am aware that my position holds has a much weaker foundation that one based on science and mathematics. I am also aware that science and mathematics do not put on uniforms and take the field."

Oooo that's an awful strategy.

Hey, let's ignore numbers and facts and things that we can actually judge, like performance, and go with opinion!!

Oh yeah...F-Rod's stats were so horrible last year...ONLY THE SINGLE BEST SEASON EVER BY A RELIEVER!! Yeah, what a bum. Who wants that guy that Saves 62 games in a season...give me a frigon break, do you hear yourself?

Kherub you tool.

Do you realize that KROD had AT BEST the 6th best season last year. Better than him last year were in no particular order:

Rivera, Nathan, Soria, Lidge, Papelbon.

Everyone just relax. The baseball gods have decided to shine on the mets. We need a closer after 2 horrific collapses, whait? KROD is available and he will just cost us money? We will sign KROD and omar will do his usual cast a wide net on rps and see what works out. I also expect Ollie to be back because as a 3-4 starter on our because he is a young left handed starter who misses bats and he would at best be our 3rd starter avoiding any real pressure because we will just throw johan 3 times in a 5 games series to avoid failure once again.

Scribble I'm not ignoring these things, I'm just not applying them exclusively.

I'm not suggesting that you don't, but I enjoy baseball for more than sabermetrics, I also enjoy the emotional ebb and flow, and the idea that the game is not played "on paper." If it were, my favorite team would be coming off 3 consecutive division titles, or so the prognosticators tell me.

As I am simply a fan, not a major league GM, I see no harm in this philosophy.

because pitchers dont have bad/drop-off years in between good ones

What the hell are you talking about?

"I'm not suggesting that you don't, but I enjoy baseball for more than sabermetrics, I also enjoy the emotional ebb and flow, and the idea that the game is not played "on paper." If it were, my favorite team would be coming off 3 consecutive division titles, or so the prognosticators tell me.

As I am simply a fan, not a major league GM, I see no harm in this philosophy."

Wow if that is the case then you really don't belong on this site.

Most of the discussions on this site are based around what happens "on paper."

In fact this website is basically built around the concept of teams being built on paper.

If you love the emotional ebb and flow of the game as well as the game itself more than the "hot stove game", then you really should be like playing MLB 2K9 or something. I don't get why you would want to discuss baseball if all of this was the case.

nrmax, scribble tone, thank you.

kherub, you are an idiot.

I didn't say k-rod was a terrible closer. I said his peripherals were. If he can be had at a reasonable rate, sure, go for it. But don't expect the next coming of Rivera. He's going to give you just as much indigestion as Wagner did. I still want Street as a setup man.

Too whom ever suggested K-Rod had the single best year of any reliever EVER.

Pitcher A: 64 G, 70.2 IP, 41 H, 6 BB, 77 K, 1.40 ERA, 0.665 WHIP, .165/.190/.233
Pitcher B: 76 G, 68.1 IP, 54 H, 34 BB, 77 K, 2.24 ERA, 1.288 WHIP, .216/.314/.316

Pitcher A: Mariano Rivera
Pitcher B: Francisco Rodriguez
http://riveraveblues.com/2008/11/a-tale-of-two-pitchers-5885/

Moving on.

BJ Ryan is not head and shoulders above Fuentes.

They are the same age. Fuentes had a lower ERA, 6 less walks in 4 and 2/3 more innings, 24 more strikeouts, and a lower whip. I could go on but won't.

Now, let us compare Fuentes and Frankie.

Fuentes in 4 2/3 less innings then K-Rod, has more strike outs, 12 less walks, and lower whip.

While K-Rod might be better and younger then Fuentes, if Fuentes comes considerably cheaper, IMO he becomes the better option.

I'd like to basically agree with everything Thirty5Thirty6 said.

Ryan's stuff has been declining according to scouts, and I would definitely argue that Fuentes is equal to Ryan is not better overall.

If Fuentes will sign for 3/33 and Rodriguez will sign for 4/48, then I really think you're better off signing Fuentes. Rodriguez may be younger but he's also shown more clear signs of physical decline due to his violent mechanics.

"

To Thirty5Thirty6:

I don't have time to address all the posts in this thread or even get into any real depth in this response, but let me tell ya something about your steroid hero Fairyano...with out the umpires calling anything and everything his way he'd be no better than a gigantic boil on the ugly backside of the game. Take away his steroids, and all his yankay calls, and the guy is mediocre at best. AT BEST! Francisco Rodriguez has been the best Closer in the game since he's been on the job, and I look forward to seeing the best Closer in the game close out games for my Ny METS!!

Happy Thanksgiving : )

K ~"

Wow.

I think this may be one of the worst posts of all time.

Tim, I think this may be one of those times to just put the hammer down.

Okay sounds good.

I don't care about your point of view.

I care about the way you present it.


And you're kind of rude.

Omar had better learn from the Wagner signing that old pitchers tend to break down. Krod is 7 years younger than Fuentes and his stats are put up in the AL. Fuentes is nothing special and should be paid as a setup man. Also, Omar needs to unload more old, overpaid players and remake this team into a younger more exciting team. The Phillies will finish ahead of us anyway again.

I cannot believe we are having this debate about KROD and Fuentes. You sign KROD even if its for 4 years. We go younger because if you guys remember last season, players we were counting on (Moises, Pedro, duque, Wagner) all older players who were injured or playing injured contributed to the collapses. I do not know why we are not making this huston street for heilman feliciano deal. Unless omar has feliciano penciled in on other deals we should make this trade. If Shoe is completely relegated to the lefty specialist role he can fill feliciano's role. I woul dlike to have John Garland signed as well to be our 4 man 5 man if we get ollie back. Let 2 out of the 3 (parnell, Kunz, Niese) pitch out of the pen this year.

for all of you saying that k-rod's 62 saves mean nothing.... "Rodriguez surrendered just 12 earned runs in his final 56 2/3 innings for a 1.91 ERA from May through September" thats from his agent but i highly doubt his agent would lie about stats.

im not saying hes a must go after and the mets will not win a division championship without him but you cannot say he is not one of the top 5 closers in the game. EVEN with his decrease in velocity and increase in his change, he was still able to putup 62 saves. its not all about velocity in being effective. hes still got a great change of speed in his fastball/change combo and (i will admit his slider is not like it was) his slider is enough to keep hitters on their toes. as a pitcher myself, most of you dont give credt to how important and the stress a closer has to go through. someone in the post said, is heilman had 69 opportunities he would atleast get 50 saves. true but that wouldnt be a 90% save rate or the single season best save record... in the AL.

Kherub is so wrapped up in useless stats that he reminds me of someone who would vote Webb for Cy Young because ZOMG 22 WINS and Howard for MVP because MOST HOMERS AND RBIS?!!?!

clos79,

sorry you're wrong. Better this past year were:

Mariano, Lidge, Soria, Papelbon and Nathan.

As mentioned earlier the save statistic is a bunch of crap. talk to me about blown saves. Mariano and Lidge had one and zero respectively. KROD had 7.

There is no question that each of those were better than KROD.

The mets had 29 blown saves last year. KROD had 7. OK. Unless you believe that Fuentes has 100% better shot at staying healthy over the next 3-4 years then go with fuentes, but I like my pitchers younger if possible. And wont it be great when KROD does his crazy dramatic celebrations on the mound, Reyes wont be the only "showboat' on the team.

That being said, KROD is your best option available.

and Kherub, better known as "ALBERT"

Lidge did just fine against Albert this year. July 9th. he came in with a 2 run lead, walked Schumaker and then proceeded to strike out Ludwick, Pujols flied out, Glaus walked and Ankiel struck out.

Albert also grounded out on August 2nd in a 2-1 game to start off the bottom of the 9th.

So by my count he had 3 saves against Albert and the Cardinals.

And 0 blown saves on the year. 0 losses on the year.

Pujols owned Lidge in 2005.

Brad showed last year he's past that, its time you get over it too.

Oh and its already been said that Manny won't be playing for the Mets. They're not smart enough to pick up Manny. Omar will probably resign Alou or maybe Julio Franco to another 2 year contract.

Garland stinks! I don't want to see him under the Mets employ unless he needs a job grounds keeping.

I do not want another Lohse situation. When he was available last year we should of signed him. You would of said the same thing about him. Garland is under 30, with him as the 4 guy we dont have to wonder where we will get our innings from like this year. I dont know about you but hoping duque or pedro would be healthy enough to pitch was pretty frustrating. Garland goes 6.1 innings a start, in the NL lets bump that up to 6.2.

obviously no one (with the exception of trevor hoffman) can compare to mariano rivera. he has had so much more experience than those people mentioned by philschamp whatever (no disrespect to your name, just forgot it) but if you have 62 saves in a single season you cannot degrade that closer in any circumstance. now as mentioned before, the mets had 29 blown saves and k-rod had 7. also, papelbon had 5 blown saves in 23 fewer SVO than k-rod and i can be mistaken but i believe he had a higher ERA as well. k-rod gets the job done just fine. again, im not saying k-rod is a must have but it sure would be nice if we can get him for 4/50

for the moves in the offseason i would;

sign k-rod

trade heilman and feliciano for street
(i agree with most people that heilman is coming off an off year but new york cant hold him any longer. he wants to start now and thats a long shot. if he fails as a starter then where do we go from there? he loses any type of trade value he has for his ability to be able to start)

sign beimel or reyes

maybe wood as a setup?

stupid me haha street would be the setup, my bad

I don't know, I am quite nuts. Even if the Mets didn't do a single thing this offseason, I am still going to be attending my 20-30 games this season maybe just because I can have Shake shack brought over to me while sitting in a gorgeous ball park.

The comments to this entry are closed.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.