MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds and Ends: Weathers, Montero, Springer | Main | D'Backs Offer Contract To Ramon Vazquez »

A.J. Burnett Rumors: Friday

4:14pm: Tony Massarotti of the Boston Globe says that while the Red Sox have reviewed Burnett's medical records, they're still in the early stages of negotiations.

2:32pm: Robert MacLeod of The Globe and Mail has more from Ricciardi on the five-year idea:

"I'm not going to commit to a five-year deal.  There's some things we could do to maybe make it a five-year deal but that would have to be based on a lot of different things."

9:22am: The Blue Jays haven't made an offer yet to free agent starter A.J. Burnett, and GM J.P. Ricciardi doesn't expect to win the bidding by offering the most money.  However, the Jays may separate themselves by being willing to offer Burnett the five-year contract he craves. Ricciardi didn't say he would go that far, but the concept does not scare him.  He'll wait to make his offer until after other teams submit their bids.

The Toronto Sun's Mike Rutsey says the Orioles, Braves, Phillies, Yankees, and Red Sox have also expressed interest in Burnett.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105361561c3970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A.J. Burnett Rumors: Friday:

Comments

I think all this Burnett hype is way way over hyped to be honest.

Sure, when he is healthy he is dominant and yes he had an injury free 2008 season where he dominated almost every time out there.

But 5 years? I dunno about that one. I wouldnt sign an injury prone player for 5 years and a lot of money.

There is NO WAY that Burnett should be making more than Roy Halladay.

big mistake! Someone's gonna make it. I can see a 5 ERA in two years.

Everything JP says is a complete lie. He said yesterday that they aren't spending any money on anybody, but now they can be players on 5 years for Burnett? He's the only one they can spend money on?! Please. His quotes aren't worth the paper they are written on, much less to be speculated on here.

I just sit back and enjoy the ride, not bothering to listen to anything he says. Last winter he said he was confident with JMac as his SS when he signed him to a 2 year deal and then traded for Eckstein and Scutaro. He will do his tinkering, and not let the media have any clue as to how he is going to go about.

Over/Under on Burnett's innings pitched in '09.

125

I don't see where Ricciardi is open to 5 years based on Tim's comments. Just because he didn't balk at the idea doesn't mean he is open to it. I mean, he didn't say he was for it or against it so we assume he is ok with it? That's a fairly broad based assumption.

"Over/Under on Burnett's innings pitched in '09.

125"

OVER

I'll take the over, MPM. 1,000 pretend dollars?

It also behooves Ricciardi to say that given that 3 of his 4 division rivals will be in on Burnett.

I think you are arguing semantics. Open to, not scared of, not opposed to, most readers get the general idea.

I'll take the over, MPM. 1,000 pretend dollars?

After looking up his numbers that may be a little on the low side. 150 and you're on.

For 1,000 pretend dollars, lets make it 180. I'm feeling daring.

haha. No not combined.

AJ was on the salary hunt this year.

ALright maybe 5 was a little high. You want to agree at 4.5? That to me is not an $18 million pitcher for 5 years.

damn typekey I mean 16 million pitcher

Hey Tim, you know we're not happy unless we have something to complain about.

Hey Tim, you know we're not happy unless we have something to complain about.

and what's the fun if I can't argue with NJM about how he overvalues Johnny Damon?

"Over/Under on Burnett's innings pitched in '09.

125"

Ha

If his ERA+ matches that I couldn't really complain. Unless of course you give him 5 years because you aren't scared to do so.

I don't see Toronto being able to match the 5 years $80 million the Yankees offered and he's not even worth that much anyways he has a high ERA and will likey find his way back on the DL,let him go and be the Yankees mess.

Burnett has *never* had a 100 IP season where his ERA was worse than league average. In the AL East, he's had an ERA+ of 115, 119 and 105. What's the problem there?

Yanks haven't offered 5/80. It was suspected. I also read they were actually going to offer 4/60.

I'd make Burnett an incentive laden contract to stay healthy. Say 15MM a year with a 3MM bonus to pitch over 200 innings each year? offering three guaranteed with 45MM, with 9MM more in incentives, and then two mutual 18MM in 2011/2012 options which they signing team is forced to take if he pitches over say 450 innings? between those three years? this way, if he feels he can stay healthy, hes got 5 years guaranteed and the money he desires if he pitches up to standard. If not the signing team has a 100 IP each season pitcher who can dominate when healthy and hopefully turn it on in the playoffs for them.

It worked out for the red sox and bartolo colon. the sox gave up very little money and got a few quality starts.

I say a mutual option so that if the team tries to screw him over and not give him the opportunity at 200 innings each year, he can opt out, and try again with a better resume.

and that 200 realistically would have to be lower around 175-180. The numbers can be altered slightly but you get the idea.

man, probably a lot of med records for the Sox to look over.nothing new til Monday

I'm a Yanks fan and I'm not ashamed to say...I am very, very scared. Lol

If the Yanks don't sign CC I really do not see a single pitcher without question marks or an obvious downside. And to make matters worse, next years FA pool doesn't look any better and I don't think it's in our long-term best interest or for that matter Cash's desire to trade any more young players.

Can we compete with?

CC
Wang
Pettite
Joba
Hughes

I think so but it would be even nicer to have another great pitcher at #3.

I would almost rather go after Oliver Perez rather than Burnett, Lowe or Sheets.

Or maybe offer Sheets an incentive heavy 3 year deal? Maybe 3 yrs/24 mil with incentives that could push it to 15 mil per?

Yanks= 209 mil
Cubs= 119 mil

2010 Free Agent Starting pitchers
Josh Beckett - $12MM club option with a $2MM buyout
Erik Bedard
Justin Duchscherer
Rich Harden
Tim Hudson - $12MM mutual option with a $1MM buyout
John Lackey
Cliff Lee - $8MM club option with a $1MM buyout
Brett Myers
Brandon Webb - $8.5MM club option with a $500K+ buyout
Todd Wellemeyer

Shudder. Lackey apparently thinks he's close to signing and all the club options will be exercised except Hudson. If you combine this year and next year's FA pitchers, I'd say the top 3 (CC, Burnett, Lowe) are in this class with Bedard (due to shoulder concerns) 4th and Sheets probably 5th. Seems to me it makes sense that teams would be throwing their money around now.

oliver perez would be a horrible nightmare for the yankees. Hes incredibly inconsistent and he is going to be DRAMATICALLY overpaid. If I'm the Yankees, CC and Burnett are musts to compete next year. CC for the innings of dominance and burnett for dominance in the AL East.
With Wang, Sabathia, Burnett, Hughes and joba I think they would be strong favorites in the AL East for next year. However, I hear rumor that Joba is going back to the pen. Jorge came out and said he wasn't a starter and it sounds like Cashman is starting to listen to logic as well. I guy who can punch out guys at 101mph is not a guy who should be wasted throwing 93-94 as a starter. Hes built to be a late inning cannon. I dont know why the yankees didn't begin to realize that until now.

A guy*

Not "I guy"

Okay guys, the Yanks payroll was 206 million but $88 million has come off the books so, $118 million + $5 mil. Swisher + $4 mil. Marte = $127 million. Max out values for all players:
Now $127 million
CC $ 24 million
AJ $ 18 million
Lowe/Pet. $ 16 million
Total $185 million

Which leaves $21 million for a power bat and they can afford to increase payroll with new revenue from stadium. So, that is why they "overbid" for CC - he hasn't accepted so how did they "overbid". They know what they are doing and Tex. will be a Yankee and if Tex. becomes a Red Sox then Manny will definitely be a Yankee.

So, with $185 mill. + an "overbid" of $27 mill. the Yankees would be at $212 million for 2009 or $6 million more than next year. And for some reason I don't think the Yankees would have to file for bankruptcy.

I think (hope) Cashman is smart enough to steer clear of Perez unless everything breaks wrong and its down to him and Garland.

Jorge makes no decisions; Cashman and Hal have both said Joba's in the rotation. Which is the right move ... 200 IPs beats 70 IPs every year.

(Mariano's only in the pen because he didn't have the arsenal to start. Joba does.)

der last year not next year

NJM:
You are a knowledgeable fan but you forgot that Joba is on a 130 inning limit for 2009.

Hmm, I kinda like what Santana/Beckett FTW is saying. I would like to see Yankees go for Perez instead of Lowe if they fail getting Burnett though. Mainly because he has a good stuff and younger... he could improve his consistency as he ages though, but that's my assumption

and as for Joba... I liked him a lot as a set-up man, but he was pretty good as a starter also and would've been a strong ROY candidate if it weren't for injury. I dunno, he could be a great closer, but the man was a starter originally and I don't think it will be any awkward for him to be a starter for rest of his career. I'd like to see him perform about 6+ quality innings more than occasionally rather than seeing him get an inning-old hold

Yanks can go:
CC $150/6
Burnett $87.5/5
Lowe $50/3
Tex $216/8 or Manny $81/3
Hudson $55/5 if they trade Cano

I think JOba can excel and stay healthy as astarter. I think the Yanks might be well off to go with a 5 man rotation with Hughes as a spot starter long relief guy for a year.

CC (God willing)
Wang
Burnett/Perez//Lowe
Pettite
Joba

Hughes long relief.

If Joba is held to about 25 starts/140 innings next year Hughes would probably see about 10-15 starts and should be held to about 125-150. If both guys hold up and do well then in 2010 I would let Hughes replace Pettite as the #5 guy.

I just dont understand why everyone feels like we should trade Cano? Unless he's moved for a #1 or #2 type pitcher then why make that move? And he alone would not fetch a #1 or #2 because of the off year and the negative tag he has on him now, so the Yanks would be selling low. if Cash is honest about wanting to get younger and more athletic then I think it has to start with a core of Cano, Melky, Swisher, Gardner, Nady, Wang, Joba and Hughes. And yeah, yeah, yeah I know, everyone feels Melky and Gardner are garbage. However, I think they deserve a shot in CF unless Tex gets signed and that moves Swisher to LF and Damon to CF(ugg). But as far as position players, Cano is obviously the best. To me 2B is not a problem and while Hudson is a good player he's already 31 and would command at least a 3 or 4 year deal. And I definetly feal Cano can put up better numbers offensively in his sleep.

Hughes for long relief would be a terrible idea. Young pitchers need to be able to work on their offspeed pitches and coming out of the bullpen would not allow them to do so they would be better off letting him pitch in AAA and calling him up to the rotation when Burnett or Wang make their routine trip to the DL.

I see your point but I disagree. He has nothing else to prove in the minors. Meanwhile, Joba will be restricted on his pitching. Hughes can make 10-15 starts in a season to give Joba some days off. And in the case of a blow out he can come in the 3rd or 4th inning and pitch 4 or 5 innings. I don't mean bring him in during the middle of an inning to get a batter out, I mean bring him to start an inning. What really is the difference for a starting pitcher? He can warm up just like a starter but instead it's during the middle of the game instead of the end. Probably a lot less pressure on him as well. Giaradi can make sure he gets 5 or 6 inning a week or so.

Also, he would never pitch w/o 3 days rest or so. He wouldn't be a regular relief pitcher but I think he MUST get innings in the majors next year.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.