![]() |
|
|
| |
« Punto Visits With Phillies, Draws Yankee Interest | Main | Mariners Rumors: Putz, Washburn, Beltre »
7:35pm: Brian Cashman spoke about Cano, Ian Kennedy, and Phil Hughes. He doesn't seem likely to trade any of them.
3:05pm: Peter Abraham learned from Colletti that he hasn't talked to the Yankees since July.
2:04pm: MLB.com's Ken Gurnick talked to Ned Colletti, who said he hasn't talked to the Yankees yet.
12:02pm: According to Ken Rosenthal, the Dodgers and Yankees have resumed their discussions about second baseman Robinson Cano at the Meetings. The Dodgers also like Melky Cabrera, while the Yankees hope to get Matt Kemp and pitching from L.A.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105364de3db970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dodgers, Yanks Did Not Resume Cano Discussions:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I hope Cano goes, he is a red sox killer!
Posted by: mike_lee | December 08, 2008 at 12:04 PM
Tim, do you think this discussion will ever end? if so, will it end in a deal (who would be involved) or empty words?
Posted by: thinkblue | December 08, 2008 at 12:04 PM
oh great, now Yankee fans will be on here talking about getting Kemp/Kershaw or Billingsley for Cano/Cabrera
Posted by: Adam | December 08, 2008 at 12:05 PM
They LIKE Melky Cabrera?
Maybe when he isn't playing baseball...
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 08, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Although it won't be too hard to suggest a couple realistic packages... I find these talks very odd.
Both teams could fill vacant starter sport, but at the same time lose current starters...
bizare situation if you ask me
Posted by: tehasguard | December 08, 2008 at 12:07 PM
*spots obviously
Posted by: tehasguard | December 08, 2008 at 12:07 PM
As a Yankees fan, I don't think Cano is nearly enough for a player of Kemp's caliber.
I think that would be highway robbery if it happens.
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Why would the Dodgers trade Kemp for THAT?! The Yankees must be licking their chops right now in anticipation of their theft. Please Ned, do not give Kemp away!
Posted by: SpaceMonkey | December 08, 2008 at 12:10 PM
Yankees should do it.
Then move Jeter to 2nd and sign Furcal - We desperately need a true lead off man.
Posted by: JayMac | December 08, 2008 at 12:11 PM
This will get evryone fired-up with a slew of crazy posts.
tehasguard - It is weird,right? It does seem like if either team did that deal they would have to do something else after it. of course, that could be the reason things are slow to form...teams are lining up multiple moves.
Posted by: CMM | December 08, 2008 at 12:11 PM
Ned Colletti should be embarassed this is even a rumor.
Come on...Cano for Kemp and pitching.
Even with Cabrera that's not even close.
Posted by: Trizza | December 08, 2008 at 12:12 PM
As a Giants fan, I really hope the Dodgers trade Matt Kemp and/or a young stud pitcher to the Yankees for Cano and/or Cabrera. I'd especially love to see Matt Kemp go to the Yankees as I own him in a keeper fantasy league.
My personal biases aside, I'm not sure even "Agent" Ned Coletti is dumb enough to do a trade like that.
Not to say that Cano isn't very good, but after the season he just had, Cano's value is as low as it has ever been. On the other hand, he's still only 26, so perhaps a change of scenery and teaming back up with Torre will do him some good.
But, he still isn't worth Matt Kemp straight up.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | December 08, 2008 at 12:14 PM
Wow, the Dodgers really like Melky? Melky is nothing more than a AAAA player. If I were the Dodgers, I think that I would rather give Jones another shot in center over Melky.
Posted by: AFROTC Cadet | December 08, 2008 at 12:15 PM
Of course the Yanks should do it, JayMac.
It isn't that easy though, I doubt very highly a one for one swap would even be considered.
Also, I think if the Yanks do move Cano, it will be to pursue Orlando Hudson as their second baseman. Maybe they get in on Furcal, but in that case, I could see him shifting to second as opposed to Jeter.
Both he and Hudson are injury risks though, and I wouldn't want to see them commit any more than three years to either player.
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Yankee fans, let's be realistic here. Cano & Hughes for Kemp is close to fair. Not sure that I would do it if I were the Dodgers but I'd at least consider it anyway. probably insist on Chamberlain instead of Hughes.
LOL
Posted by: Robin | December 08, 2008 at 12:20 PM
This is why I hate Ned Colletti. He hasn't made one good trade since he's been the GM. He has continually traded away players of value for steaming piles of crap. I have no problem with him signing Juan Pierre, Jason Schmidt and Andruw Jones. All those things did was cost money (especially this season when Torre realized Kemp and Ethier were better than Pierre or Jones). But trading away players is what is dooming the Dodgers. We receive Casey Blake, Julio Lugo, Jae Seo, Danys Baez, Wilson Betemit, and a slew of other crap players. And we give up players with potential, players with high trade value. This very reason is why I feared Ned remaining the GM. He's not looking to trade Juan Pierre. He's looking into deals where Matt Kemp would be traded. Awesome. The Dodgers will suck until Logan While becomes the GM.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 12:22 PM
"oh great, now Yankee fans will be on here talking about getting Kemp/Kershaw or Billingsley for Cano/Cabrera"
Well, I'm a Yankee fan and I can't see Kershaw or Billigsley being available to anyone for anything. If they are, Colletti is a loon.
What would the Dodgers give up in exchange for getting out from under the Juan Pierre deal? IS Eric Stults any good?
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 08, 2008 at 12:23 PM
How silly all you Kemp lovers are.
Compare Cano over the last 3 years to Kemp over the last 3 years.
Cano measures up to be a better player.
You folks are only remembering last year.
The two years before that Cano was the premier 2nd Baseman in the AL.
Posted by: JayMac | December 08, 2008 at 12:25 PM
LOL @ Hughes and Cano for Kemp
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 12:26 PM
"probably insist on Chamberlain instead of Hughes"
Apparently, it isn't just the Yankee fans who need to be realistic. Chamberlain straight up is worth a lot more than Kemp.
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 08, 2008 at 12:28 PM
"Cano & Hughes for Kemp is close to fair" and then the Yankee fans a crazy? And he is not sure he would do it. jajaja
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 12:28 PM
"But, he still isn't worth Matt Kemp straight up."
Really? Remember, it is only a good trade if both sides hurt. Kemp has an extra tool on Cano; the base running, but Robi plays plus defense at a relatively offensive challenged position. You're putting too much weight on a bad (.150avg) April and babip.
Cano', McAllister/IPK/Betances, mCab, ? || Kemp, Kershaw/Pitcher, ?.
although Betances is a Brooklyn boy and he hurt his draft status by saying only yankees out of high school, meaning I don't want to give him up
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | December 08, 2008 at 12:29 PM
JayMac,
How silly you are. You want to compare Kemp's 21, 22 and 23 year old seasons to Cano's 23, 24 and 25 year old seasons? Let alone the fact that Matt Kemp didn't start playing baseball until 17?
First off, let's start with Cano's 2006 season - the season ALL Yankee fans love. Cano had a .363 BABIP that year. That's the ONLY reason he hit .342. His OBP over the past 3 seasons has fallen EACH year. His OPS+ has fallen EACH year. Cano is not as good as his 2006 year was. Please stop acting like he is. You just look foolish.
Oh, and I never even mentioned his contract...
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Well, Ned has yet to sign a CF this offseason, thus the "interest" in Melky.
If the Dodgers are going to commit big money to a second baseman (Cano is guaranteed 3/29 through 2011), why not pursue Orlando Hudson or a 3B (DeWitt to 2B) and keep a potential superstar in Kemp?
AND the Yankees want pitching added? Hilarious.
Posted by: vtadave | December 08, 2008 at 12:31 PM
Wow, the Dodgers really like Melky? Melky is nothing more than a AAAA player. If I were the Dodgers, I think that I would rather give Jones another shot in center over Melky.
Posted by: BadVlad | December 08, 2008 at 12:15 PM
I have to LOL at that one if you think you would give Andruw another shot
.158/.256/.249 in 75 games, practically half a season
Melky
.249/.301/.341
Yes I am aware that is pretty bad too, but at this point, I would gladly take Melky over Andruw.....I don't care about the past and how good Andruw used to be, Andruw will never be the same
However, I think this would be stupid for the Dodgers to do
Cano and Melky for Kemp and pitching isn't a fair trade for the Dodgers
Posted by: mike923 | December 08, 2008 at 12:31 PM
"Robi plays plus defense at a relatively offensive challenged position."
Cano is a below average defender. EVERY metric says so.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Hilarious. Why would the Dodgers commit to paying Cano 3/29 through 2011 and not at least pursue Orlando Hudson or a third baseman?
AND the Yankees want pitching added? Good stuff.
Posted by: vtadave | December 08, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Hey DodgersBruin, as long as we're talking about BABIP, lets not forget to mention Kemp's.
2006- .340
2007- .417
2008- .363
And Cano's contract is rather affordable considering the going rate these days for a player of his caliber and position.
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 12:35 PM
I didn't say 3/29 is terrible. That's not the issue.
The question is why would Dodgers deal Kemp and pitching for Cano and Melky?
Kemp + free agent 2b or 3B + pitching not dealt >>> Melky + Cano
Posted by: vtadave | December 08, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Colletti does add one CF that will not help the Dodgers each year that he looks to replace the next year...
2007: Pierre
2008: Jones
2009: Melky Cabrera
Posted by: MikeClarke | December 08, 2008 at 12:44 PM
How much stock do you think that the Dodger are putting in a reunion of Cano with Boa and Torre? if theres any, they might just make the deal.
Posted by: GeneralManager | December 08, 2008 at 12:45 PM
"Cano & Hughes for Kemp is close to fair. Not sure that I would do it if I were the Dodgers but I'd at least consider it anyway. probably insist on Chamberlain instead of Hughes."
And people like to laugh at Yankee fans trade ideas...
The Dodgers fans need to realize that the Yankees really like Cano, and the Dodgers are the ones trying to make a trade happen. The Yankees aren't going to trade him unless they're blown away by an offer.
Posted by: yanksfan | December 08, 2008 at 12:46 PM
""Yankee fans, let's be realistic here. Cano & Hughes for Kemp is close to fair. Not sure that I would do it if I were the Dodgers but I'd at least consider it anyway. probably insist on Chamberlain instead of Hughes.
LOL"""
i literally laughed at that proposition- cano is pretty much equal to kemp even in his down year- kemps ability to strike out a ton equals cano- who has potential defensively but sometimes acts lackadaisical in the field
cano is more proven, kemp steals bases
cano and hughes > matt kemp
if it was cano for kemp straight up it would be a fair deal, but i still wouldnt do it- the yanks line up is very right-handed heavy right now, we dont need to deal a young left handed bat for a young right handed bat
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 12:47 PM
RWS,
BABIP = LD% + .12
Cano: LD% expected BABIP actual BABIP
2006 19.9% .319 .363
2007 16.9% .289 .331
2008 19.4% .314 .286
Kemp:
2006 24.3% .363 .340
2007 17.5% .295 .417
2008 23.0% .350 .363
So what does this show? Cano in 2006 and 2007 was extremely lucky. And was unlucky in 2008. He's not as bad as he was last season. But Kemp is about in line with his production. He was WAY over his head in 2007, but pretty close in 2006 and 2008.
And as for Cano's "rather affordable" contract for a player of his caliber, well, we know what the going rate is for a below average defender with a .305 OBP... it's called Juan Pierre and his $10M per season. So I guess Cano at 3/$27M is slightly below market value for a player of his caliber and position.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 12:50 PM
dodgersbruin...babip is not a very valid statistic- it doesnt tell how hard balls were hit- cano is a line drive gap to gap hitter..he is not equal to juan pierre in any shape or form- cano does not send dribblers through the infield and call them hits
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 12:54 PM
"if it was cano for kemp straight up it would be a fair deal, but i still wouldnt do it"
I can't believe Yankee fans. It really is true that common sense isn't so common. Cano is NOT better than Kemp. Kemp is younger than Cano. Kemp can steal bases. Kemp plays above average defense. Kemp has only been playing baseball since he was 17. Kemp's ceiling is a Superstar. And Kemp is making close to league minimum.
Cano can't steal bases and is a bad base runner. Cano plays below average defense. Cano is at or near his ceiling. And Cano makes $27M over the next 3 seasons.
Oh, and Kemp had a .340 OBP vs. Cano's .305 OBP. Please, Yankee fans, PLEASE tell me where Cano is better than Kemp.
Is it the present? Is it the future? Or is it only the 2006 season?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 12:56 PM
RWS:
Are you really trying to argue that a slighty older, more expensive, worse offensive and defensive player, who plays a less important position, is more valuable than one who is none of those things?? Kemp is greater than Cano...period. Cano is a good 2B but he's not eilite. Utley, Pedroia, Roberts and Phillips are all well above him. Hudson is almost as good an option as well. I agree with the Dodgers fans Kemp for Cano and Cabrera would be a horrible deal for LA.
Posted by: Steveo26 | December 08, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Line Drive % tells how hard a ball was hit. Cano's LD% for his career is 19.1%. Juan Pierre's LD% for his career is 21.8%.
So in fact, Cano is LESS of a line drive gap to gap hitter than Pierre is.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:03 PM
you just said cano is at his ceiling..obviously you do not watch baseball often or have seen scouting reports on cano
and that is all the defense you have? "oh all you yankee fans" "kemps ceiling is supserstar" and you say we overvalue our players
your bias is laughable, and all you can say is "oh those yankee fans thinking cano is so great" mhm..keep thinking that
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Matt Kemp Scouting Report:
"Most Major League scouts see him as a 30 HR 30 steal guy with MVP and All Star potential. A player to keep your eye on. "
Hmm, looks like the scouts overvalue Kemp too. 30-30 with MVP and All Star potential... sounds a lot like Grady Sizemore, doesn't it? Is he a superstar?
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:07 PM
If Kemp gets traded I will not watch an inning of Dodger baseball in 09. Same goes for Billingsley, Kershaw, or Martin.
Trading Kemp for Cano with Hughes or Melky is just DUMB. We dont need young pitching, weve got enough of those guys right now. We dont need a crappy cf, weve got 2 of them already. We dont need a 2b with an OPS+ in the 80s, weve got a younger 2b that is 30 million cheaper over the next 3 years in Dewitt, who put up the same year with a bit less power and the ability to get on base much more frequently.
These rumors need to die. There is ZERO reason to trade Kemp, or any of the young MLB ready Dodgers. If a trade does happen involving them, Colleti will lose his job in less than a year, Depodesta style.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 01:11 PM
Robinson Cano scouting report: "Has one of the best left-handed swings in the game, with tremendously quick hands. Eats fastballs alive and mauls right-handed pitching. Boasts a good arm. All star second baseman with MVP potential"
you mad?
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:11 PM
"Cano has drawn comparisons to Alfonso Soriano for his style of play and natural ability, but while second base may be his position now, it may not be in the future."
read that again
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:14 PM
Yankee fans, try all you want to defend Cano, but if some bullsh** trade were to happen, and Kemp was your CF next year, you would be saying every word that we are.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 01:14 PM
I've said more than "oh those yankee fans thinking cano is so great". I've talked about Cano's 3 year declining OBP, 3 year declining OPS, his $27M owed over the next 3 seasons when he's getting on base at the same rate as Juan Pierre, and his shoddy defense.
But hey, keep spouting off about Cano's 2006 season, which when viewed objectively looks like a lucky career year due to his extremely high BABIP. And keep claiming he's a plus defender. And by all accounts, PLEASE keep Cano on the Yankees. I'd rather have Blake DeWitt for the next 3 years than Robinson Cano. He's better defensively, gets on base more often and is paid league minimum. Oh, and is only going to be 23 next season.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:15 PM
How about we just keep Cano. Because Cano is one of the best second basemen in the game. And because he had one subpar year we should not give up on him.
Posted by: yanks12025 | December 08, 2008 at 01:16 PM
So Cano will be out in left field in 2 years?
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 01:18 PM
Wow. Whatever scout compared Cano to Soriano MUST have been talking about defensively because they aren't even CLOSE offensively. Soriano's HR total his first 6 years: 18, 39, 38, 28, 36, 46.
Most HRs Cano has hit in a season: 19.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:19 PM
if you can name 6 second baseman better than robinson cano right now for this year (2008) ill drop this
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:19 PM
Hey Steveo26, I think you need to read things a bit closer.
I'll enlighten you in case you missed my first post on this topic:
As a Yankees fan, I don't think Cano is nearly enough for a player of Kemp's caliber.
I think that would be highway robbery if it happens.
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 12:09 PM
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 01:23 PM
Chase Utley, Dustin Pedroia, Brian Roberts, Dan Uggla, Ian Kinsler, Placido Polanco. I can name probably 10 more who had higher OPS+ than Cano this season.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:25 PM
If you don't like Polanco, then Brandon Phillips can be my #6.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:26 PM
DodgersBruin, you make a fair point about LD % when figuring out expected BABIP.
But as you stated, Cano is not as bad as he was last season. To compare his value to Juan Pierre is a bit of a stretch.
Posted by: RWS | December 08, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Dan Uggla? Really?...
As much as I like getting Matt Kemp, I think Cano has so much promise. Dodgers fans think Kemp has promise to so... Lets not trade!
Posted by: Col!n | December 08, 2008 at 01:29 PM
OPS does not = better player and i can name 8 center fielders better than kemp this year
dan uggla is not better than robinson cano, brandon phillips had an almost identical cano year
but ill make a nice list for you:
grady sizemore
carlos beltran
curtis granderson
Josh hamilton
shane victorino
BJ upton (even with an injured shoulder)
torii hunter
nate mcclouth
and even a nice throw in of cody ross
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:31 PM
Even Rickie Weeks was more productive than Cano in 2008...Kelly Johnson...
Posted by: vtadave | December 08, 2008 at 01:34 PM
I don't think Cano is as bad as Pierre, that is true. However, over the past 3 seasons Cano's OBP has dropped. Bill James expects Cano's OBP to be .333 next season. To pay Cano $27M over 3 years for that OBP while playing below average defense is not a good strategy for a winning team. Especially when Blake DeWitt, in his first season above AA ball at 22 got on base at a .344 clip. Not only is he much better defensively, but he also makes league minimum.
I think within 2 years DeWitt could be straight up better than Cano. As it is right now, I think DeWitt is the better VALUE.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:35 PM
I think I speak for all Dodgers fans when I say that this offseason has been an incredibly frustrating winter so far. First, we have probably the most inept GM in the league, although Ed Wade might give him some competition. Second, our owners are telling us how cheap they're going to be. Now, the only rumors we hear about are about trades for overvalued middle infielders.
This move, if it were to happen, would be classic Dodgers GM folly. Sell your potential superstar, who's playing for league minimum, for an established solid but not spectacular player. Oh, and Melky's garbage. Might as well have JP or Repko out there in CF.
I can only take solace in knowing that the Giants are throwing millions at washed up Edgar Renteria because he's supposedly better in the NL (no, he's just older than he was when he played for the Cards) and that Logan White will hopefully be GM next season.
Posted by: BlueBlooded | December 08, 2008 at 01:38 PM
hawkeyes - please stop. You're embarrassing yourself.
Cody Ross > Kemp
I'd be interested to hear your Uggla/Cano analysis and how Cano was better in 2008 despite losing 159 points of OPS to the Florida 2B.
As for your CF list, don't think that any of those teams, don't think that the Mets (Beltran's age/contract), Phillies, Angels, and Pirates (obviously FLA as well) gladly wouldn't swap CF's with the Dodgers.
Posted by: vtadave | December 08, 2008 at 01:38 PM
"dan uggla is not better than robinson cano"
Dan Uggla OBP: .360
Dan Uggla HR: 32
Dan Uggla SLG: .514
Cano OBP: .305
Cano HR: 14
Cano SLG: .410
Oh, and Uggla plays in a larger ballpark than Cano.
As for you listing 8 CFs better than Kemp this season, congrats? I never said there weren't 8 CFs better than Kemp this season. I said Kemp is 1. better than Cano, 2. A Superstar in the making, and 3. A better value than Cano.
And yes, OPS DOES make a better player, especially when Cano offers NEGATIVE value defensively.
But okay, if OPS doesn't make you a better player, what does? Getting on base a lot? Cano doesn't do that. Hitting for lots of power? Cano doesn't do that. Stealing lots of bases? Cano doesn't do that. Playing Gold Glove defense? Cano doesn't do that. Get paid a lot of money? Cano DOES do that. Well, over the next 3 years at least.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:41 PM
saying rickie weeks was more productive u might as well have said wilson betemit shouldve been traded straight up for pujols and then the yanks shouldve flipped over pujols to the jays for scott rolen
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:41 PM
vtadave if you learned to read you could see that i said 2008
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:42 PM
Alexei Ramirez was better than Cano in 2008 also.
Posted by: DLK | December 08, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Vtadave
Cano in his worst year had a better batting average and fielding percentage than Uggla. Uggla also struck out 2 and 1/2 times more
Posted by: Col!n | December 08, 2008 at 01:47 PM
OPS+ for 2008 for 2B (keep in mind that 100 is league average):
Pedroia: 122
Roberts: 117
Iwamura: 92
Scutaro: 87
Cano: 86
This is just the AL East. Cano was the WORST 2B in the division this past season.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:50 PM
RWS: I stand corrected I did miss your first post I should not have addressed the comment to you.
Hawkeyes12990: what criteria would make a 2B better than Cano? OPS and OPS+ are good numbers to look at, how about runs created? Cano finished 11th in RC and 15th in Runs created per game. Vorp? Cano finished 32!!!! now that does look low to me but its out there. Win Shares? he ranked in a tie for 17th place with 5 other players none of whom played more than 120 games. Also Cano ranked as the worst 2nd baseman in the Fielding Bible this past year (Kinsler was 2nd worst but his bat was much better.)
Posted by: Steveo26 | December 08, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Hey, there were maybe 10 center fielders better than Kemp this year, cool.
There were 25 better 2b than cano this year, and that is probly a low estimate.
In fact, one of those ones that were better was Blake Dewitt, who had a similar OPS+, much better obp, and much better defense.
Cano is sooooo great. Thats why the Yanks should have him.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 01:50 PM
Col!n -
Batting average and strikeouts are meaningless. Uggla got on base 36% of his ABs. Cano only 30%. Uggla also hit more than twice as many HRs as Cano. And the Marlins' stadium is slightly larger than Yankee Stadium.
Also, fielding percentage doesn't tell how good a fielder is. But no one has argued that Uggla is a defensive wiz. He's just an amazing hitter.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 01:53 PM
ivdown just said there were 25 other 2b better than cano
congratulations on the stupidest assessment of major league baseball talent ever
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:53 PM
So exactly where is Kemps power again? And dodger fans, is he really a CF or more of a Corner guy.
He is not Albert Pujols or even Carlos Beltran.
Posted by: JayMac | December 08, 2008 at 02:03 PM
Hawkeyes, last season Ivdown is correct. Cano was HORRIBLE last year. He was almost 20% worse than the league average. He was the worst offensive 2B in his division. And he was a below average defender. He got on base only 30% of the time. He struck out almost 3 times as much as he walked. He grounded into 18 double plays, which tied for the most by 2Bs (the WORST way to make an out). He only saw 3.35 pitches per plate appearance (worst among qualifying 2Bs), meaning he wasn't tiring a pitcher out.
What more needs to be said about Cano's 2008 season? It was miserable. It was horrible. It was terrible. And it cost $3M.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:03 PM
"ivdown just said there were 25 other 2b better than cano
congratulations on the stupidest assessment of major league baseball talent ever"
According to things like VORP and Win Shares ivdown is pretty right on the mark. I really don't understand why you just based it on this past season, that wasn't gonna go in Cano's favor any way you looked at it. If you said over the future than yes Cano is a better option than the Ronnie Belliard or Kaz Matsui but you asked about this year and those guys were just as productive as Cano in 40+ less games. Even if your question was what 2B would you take over the next 3 years, Utley, Pedroia, Roberts, Phillips are all there offensively and defensively above Cano, Kinsler and Uggla are bad defensively but so is Cano and their bats are far supierior. Kendrick also would be someone I'd take over Cano for the next 3 years.
Posted by: Steveo26 | December 08, 2008 at 02:04 PM
Games 117/159
At Bats 368/597
Hits 97/162
Runs 45/70
Doubles 13/35
Tripples 2/3
Homeruns 9/14
Rbis 52/72
Walks 45/29
Strikeouts 68/65
OBP .344/.305
SLG .383/.410
OPS+ 91/86
Blake Dewitt/Robinson Cano
Would anyone care to get me defensive stats other than errors and fielding percentage, because i know Dewitt beats Cano soundly in that category, as well.
Now before Yankee fans jump down my throat, I know, normally, Cano is a better player than Dewitt. But seeing as Dewitt was more valuable, in less games, than Cano in 08.
Ill take my chances with Dewitt devoloping and keeping Dodgers ON the Dodgers.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 02:04 PM
18 HR in his age 23 season would suggest the power is there just still developing
Posted by: DLK | December 08, 2008 at 02:05 PM
ivdown just said there were 25 other 2b better than cano
congratulations on the stupidest assessment of major league baseball talent ever
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 01:53 PM
Im refering to 08, jacka**.
Sorry, im going to evaluate Cano only by 2006. Going by that logic, Andruw Jones is the best center fielder in baseball! The Dodgers are lucky to have him on their roster.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 02:07 PM
It seems like every off-season, Rosenthal stubbornly prints this Cano to the Dodgers rumor...
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 08, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Kemp is 23. It is well known that power takes time to develop. It develops out of the line drive rate. Kemp's rate has been 24%, 18%, 23%. He had 38 doubles last year. The scouts believe he's going to be a 30-30 guy.
As for CF vs. corner, Kemp has a very strong arm. He can play the corner, but I think he's more valuable in CF. Even if he's a 25 HR a year guy it's more valuable in CF than in RF or LF.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:07 PM
Ivdown, you don't have to pick one season. He's not the best (as in '06), but there aren't 25 2B worse than him (as in '08). Relax psycho.
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 08, 2008 at 02:09 PM
Cano is still one of the top ten offensive second basemen in baseball.
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 08, 2008 at 02:10 PM
Metzfan,
It was Hawkeye that told us to only look at the 2008 season. Read the thread before you post erroneously and make yourself look dumb.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:10 PM
even in 08 cano is still not worse than 25 other second baseman
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 02:11 PM
Lol at this rumor still.
Posted by: Why_was_I_born_a Dodger fan | December 08, 2008 at 02:15 PM
Hawkeye, you're just refusing to accept reality. Cano had a .305 OBP in 2008. His OPS+ was 86. Those are TERRIBLE. AND he was sub par defensively. There is nothing redeeming about Cano's 2008.
Will he be as bad in 2009? Probably not. But to deny that he was the WORST offensive 2B in his division and that there weren't 25 2Bs last season with higher OPS+ is just asinine.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:15 PM
LOL....all this for a made up rumor. Kenny R strikes again.
I swear he makes up at least 85% of his "rumors"
Posted by: JayMac | December 08, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Ivdown, you don't have to pick one season. He's not the best (as in '06), but there aren't 25 2B worse than him (as in '08). Relax psycho.
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 08, 2008 at 02:09 PM
Lmao. I didn't realize I was being psycho. Let me go put away my axe.
Do you think there might be a reason why I might have picked a certain year? Hmmmm....I wonder what reason it could be that I picked 08...
Do you think anyone else could help me out with the reasoning for it? Ohhh, I remember. Its because it was the LAST SEASON EITHER PLAYED.
And before you think I went all psycho again, if I could have bolded that I would have instead of caps.
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 02:17 PM
And glad to see that Rosenthal is making things up. Colletti says he hasn't talked to the Yankees. Rosenthal is getting less credible by the minute. I swear he makes up rumors that he wants to see happen so he can release another column.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:17 PM
What's with all the misinformation (allegedly) out of Rosenthal lately, anyway?
Posted by: Mattyc44 | December 08, 2008 at 02:18 PM
"MLB.com's Ken Gurnick talked to Ned Colletti, who said he hasn't talked to the Yankees yet."
"According to Ken Rosenthal, the Dodgers and Yankees have resumed their discussions.."
Again, Rosenthal making things up as he goes along. When are people going to quit taking what this buffoon has to say seriously?
Posted by: A | December 08, 2008 at 02:18 PM
did i say it was redeeming and that he is the all-time greatest 2nd baseman ever?
im just saying there is no reason to hate on him because of 1 down year and that he is an aggressive hitter...vladimir guerrero is an aggresive hitter who doesnt walk much but you dont hate on him because he is a great hitter...leave a 26 year old 2nd baseman who had a down year alone
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 02:19 PM
Hawkeye...wow man. You just cannot accept reality, can you?
Do you want to show me who Cano was better than in 06 and why?
Posted by: Ivdown | December 08, 2008 at 02:19 PM
I think that some of you Dodger fans are going to need some blood pressure medication to make it through this week if you are going to get this upset over a stupid one line rumor during the winter meetings.
Perhaps you could just chill for a day or two and see what actually happens. Perhaps it is totally wrong. Perhaps there are other players involved. Perhaps there is a 3rd team or another move in mind.
Seriously, dial it down a bit.
Posted by: CMM | December 08, 2008 at 02:21 PM
im done arguing but ty
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 08, 2008 at 02:22 PM
All these
yes and no are getting dizzy.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 08, 2008 at 02:23 PM
Geez, everyone calm down.
"Im refering to 08, jacka**.
Sorry, im going to evaluate Cano only by 2006. Going by that logic, Andruw Jones is the best center fielder in baseball! The Dodgers are lucky to have him on their roster."
That is what Ivdown said. You can't just look at one season and jump to conclusions. in '06, Cano was unbelievable. In '08, he was horrible. That doesn't mean Cano is horrible. He's still one of the ten best offensive second basemen in the game. Relax.
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 08, 2008 at 02:24 PM
I kind of agree with Hawkeyes. He had one down year, he's only 25. Give him a chance before you right him off. Yes, he's not a .342 hitter like he was in '06, that was just an amazing year. But he's certainly not as bad as he was this year, he will be a consistent .300-.310 hitter in the big leagues.
Posted by: metzfan22 | December 08, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Vlad Guerrero gets on base 39% of the time for his career. Vlad has a 147 OPS+ for his career. Vlad's WORST season he had 400 ABs was a 130 OPS+, meaning he was 30% better than league average. Vlad also has some power.
And by the way, Vlad walked 51 times last season in 600 plate appearances. Twice as good as Cano's 26 walks in 634 plate appearances. And Cano's BEST season wasn't even to the level of Vlad's WORST. Please NEVER compare the two again.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:26 PM
i think the only reasonable trade that could happen between these two clubs is this
cano + melky + kennedy/or another pitching prospect
for kemp and maybe kershaw but it still maybe be a little unbalanced but at least its not straight up 1 for 1
Posted by: Nos1589 | December 08, 2008 at 02:28 PM
"I think that some of you Dodger fans are going to need some blood pressure medication to make it through this week if you are going to get this upset over a stupid one line rumor during the winter meetings.
Perhaps you could just chill for a day or two and see what actually happens. Perhaps it is totally wrong. Perhaps there are other players involved. Perhaps there is a 3rd team or another move in mind.
Seriously, dial it down a bit."
It's not the possible trade that upsets the Dodger fans. We all know Colletti is dumb enough to make this trade. It's the Yankee fans who INSIST that Cano is more valuable than Kemp despite performance, salary and projections of the two players. And then Yankee fans that claim that Cano was awesome last year despite the statistics.
It's the refusal to accept reality. Cubs fans and Yankee fans tend to act the same. And both are the loudest about how GREAT their players/ prospects are. If you're going to keep talking, I'll just keep citing statistics to prove otherwise.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:32 PM
"cano + melky + kennedy/or another pitching prospect
for kemp and maybe kershaw but it still maybe be a little unbalanced but at least its not straight up 1 for 1"
Kershaw ain't going anywhere. There is nothing the Yankees can give up that will make the Dodgers give up Kershaw.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 08, 2008 at 02:34 PM
"i think the only reasonable trade that could happen between these two clubs is this
cano + melky + kennedy/or another pitching prospect
for kemp and maybe kershaw but it still maybe be a little unbalanced but at least its not straight up 1 for 1"
Kemp = 23, Kershaw = 20. Kemp projects to be an MVP Candidate, 30-30 player, All Star. Kershaw projects to be a #1 Ace, Cy Young winner.
Why would they trade those two for a 2B making $27M over the next 3 years, a #5/AAAA pitcher and a AAAA OF?
There isn't a player the Dodgers would trade Kershaw for straight up. He was a league average major leaguer at 20 last season. And oh by the way, in case you didn't know, our owner is cheap. And Kershaw costs league minimum.
Posted by: DodgersBruin | December 08, 2008 at 02:35 PM