![]() |
|
|
| |
« Multiple Offers For Kawakami? | Main | Odds and Ends: Astros, Saito, Yankees »
8:48pm: Tyler Kepner of the New York Times spoke to people involved with the deal and he gets the feeling that "the Yankees are backing away" for baseball reasons, not financial ones. Kepner adds that the Yankees know they don't have to make this trade immediately if they don't want to.
6:18pm: MLB.com's Adam McCalvy heard from a source that talks between the Brewers and Yankees are at a "stalemate," and did not resume today.
Peter Abraham writes that Igawa may no longer be a part of the deal.
Mark Feinsand of the New York Daily News wrote earlier today that the two teams have agreed on which players to trade. He heard from a source that the Yankees would likely send Igawa, Melky Cabrera and cash to the Brewers for Cameron.
A second source told Feinsand that the Brewers could send Bill Hall along too, an idea Tom Haudricourt suggested last week.
11:54am: SI.com's Jon Heyman says the Yankees' talks for Brewers center fielder Mike Cameron are expected to resume soon. He says the Yankees still want the Brewers to either pick up a few million of Cameron's $10MM salary or take on some of Kei Igawa's contract. The Brewers don't want to do that.
I'm not sure how the Yankees have managed to steer the conversation toward Cameron being overpaid. He's not, and a fair baseball trade would involve the Yankees paying all of Cameron's salary while giving up something useful.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105365f59fe970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mike Cameron-Yankees Rumors:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I find it very odd that the Yanks are being frugal about this. To them it would be like signing Cameron to a 14M deal and releasing Igwawa. With their unlimited finances it seems like a no brainer.
Posted by: bbxxj | December 15, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Is he worth 10 million? I don't know about that.
Posted by: Dave4G4e | December 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM
I find it very odd that the Yankees want to spend almost $25 M on Swisher, Cameron, and Pettitte rather than signing Tex.
Posted by: SBS0311 | December 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM
my assumption regarding the yankees balking at cameron's salary is just negotiations plain and simple. they are offering a positional player who plays the same position who is cheap and under control for someone the brewers want to trade because of his pay. i doubt cashman really thinks the brewers are going to send $$ with cameron rather that they will do something (i.e. take igawa and a portion of his contract)instead.
Posted by: jabanga | December 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM
I think the Yanks are going to sign Manny to one, stick it to the Sox, and two, put together the greatest 3-4 combination in decades. Their frugality may be a sign of this. They had to go hard for Burnett and Sabathia, but with everything else, they CAN be a little less aggressive if they need to.
Posted by: Dave4G4e | December 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM
If Raul Ibanez is worth $!0MM in this market, Mike Cameron is worth 10MM.
I am having difficulty with the Yankees on this one. They have the money to pay both guys, and Igawa is not exactly as useful to the Brewers as Cameron will be to the Yankees. Perhaps they've gotten too used to trading a bag of balls for a good player (Bobby Abreu anyone?) and don't know how to work a non-lopsided trade any longer?
Posted by: peterherman | December 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM
it's because tex can't play 1b, center, and pitch every 5th day
Posted by: the_kid_01 | December 15, 2008 at 12:04 PM
sbs0311 those are all short-term investments...
Posted by: jabanga | December 15, 2008 at 12:05 PM
He is overpaid for the brewers situation. It is no big secret they are dealing him to clear up payroll so it puts them at a disadvantage in negotiations. This offseason is really highlighting the headaches the 10-14 mil dollar good but not great player creates for some of these teams. The bigger payroll teams can add a few of these guys and even if one underperforms no big deal.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 15, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Dave4G4e,
GMs don't think like fans. With the rotation upgrades already made, the Yankees don't need Manny's bat to succeed. He's not really a great fit for the Yankee organization either. Any team would love to have his production, but few will put up with his nonsense.
Manny should have played it out for the Sox. He would have had a guaranteed $40MM going forward to 2011. Now he's looking at taking a paycut because he wanted to cash in.
Posted by: peterherman | December 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM
We are talking about a GM that gave 16 million to Andy Pettitte and overpaid for C.C. and Burnett. I wouldn't budge if I were the Brewers.
Posted by: SierraM | December 15, 2008 at 12:09 PM
That's it Cash...stick it to them!!!
The Yanks didn't want to pay Abreu 16 mil so why pay Cameron 14 mil ($10 mil plus Igawa's $4 mil) and basically give them Melky?
I understand we have more money than any other team but it doesn't mean we should overpay just because we can, especially when it's not an absolute need like it was for CC and AJ.
I think the Brews are stuck w/ a player they don't want and who will more than likely be their most expensive player next to Suppan.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM
$10 million for a player with a career .250 average
Last year he hit .243 with 142 K's compared to 54 BB. Terrible ratio
You don't consider that overpaid?
Posted by: Pohlad's Penny Pinchers | December 15, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Peterherman: Man-NY will be able to get much more than 2/40 mil. The Dodgers have already offered him more. I don't think he's get the years that he wants however. I think the Yanks and DOdgers would be more than willing to give him 2/50.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:15 PM
peterherman,
I don't doubt that GMs do not think like fans. Look at the non-move last year for Johan Santana on Cashman's part. Nor do I doubt they NEED Manny to win, as they do not. All I'm saying is that for a squad that put up dismal offensive numbers last year compared to their "potential", I'd be hard pressed to pass up on the opportunity of having a Hall of Fame hitter hitting next to a Hall of Fame hitter, especially when run-scoring, and not pitching, was the MAIN problem last year ironically. Just food for thought. And one half of the ownership is in love with Manny, so the ownership could trump the GM.
Posted by: Dave4G4e | December 15, 2008 at 12:16 PM
The guy is above average offensively and defensively at one of the thinnest positions. Yeah, he doesnt deserve the money Ibanez gets.
Posted by: viktor06 | December 15, 2008 at 12:17 PM
who cares if they're "short term" investments. The Yankees have $30 M plus coming off in outfielders/DHs next year with Damon, Matsui, and Nady.
You can live with Melky/Gardner in center if your 1-8 is Damon Jeter A-Rod Tex Matsui Posada Cano Nady.
Then, with all the FAs they have after 2009, they'd at least have an offensive base of Jeter A-Rod Tex Posada Cano.
As it stands, their lineup is in DEEP trouble for 2010 and beyond. Not to mention Austin Jackson could potentially be a 2009 factor w/a hot AAA start and give you what Cameron gives you.
With Hughes, Kennedy, Aceves, and whatnot available as 5th starter types (Yanks didn't struggle last year cause of the #5, they struggled because of 2 through 4 after Wang went down), they could live w/o Andy.
Posted by: SBS0311 | December 15, 2008 at 12:18 PM
The Yankees have some nerve after throwing all this money to CC to ask Brewers to pay some of Cameron's salary. Talk about arrogance.Losers. I hope the Brewers tell them to get lost.
Posted by: terry180 | December 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Keep in mind that Ibanez, one of the most sought after cheeper bats, signed for $10 mil per w/ the Phillies.
He hit .293/.358 w/ 23 hrs and 110 rbis.
Cameron offers great defense and all but would you, taking Igawa's contract in to consideration, pay Cameron $14 mil just based on what he gives you? Obviously CC pays a big hand in this as well.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:19 PM
"especially when it's not an absolute need like it was for CC and AJ."
Giving AJ 5 years and 82.5 was an absolutely necessity? Really?
"You don't consider that overpaid?"
Who isn't overpaid? You have to understand how ridiculous it looks for the Yankee front office to shy away from an extra few million after their spending last week.
Plus, Cameron is a good player. Looking at BA and K/bb isn't the only way to evaluate him. Without a doubt, he's better than Melky.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | December 15, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Here in 2008, most of us have moved beyond batting average.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 15, 2008 at 12:20 PM
YFS78, think he was referring to the 2 years of options that Manny had declined which would have been 2/40. Anyway the melky+igawa for cameron wouldnt have been 14m really as Igawa's contract is 3/12 so the real cost of the transaction would be $6m
Posted by: ECT | December 15, 2008 at 12:21 PM
Cameron will be a Yankee and will only be a matter of time. Throw Hall and Cameron to New York for Cabrera and Kennedy and call it a day.
The Yankees organization just makes me SICK. Can't pay $$ for a trade when they clearly want Mike Cameron. I said it before, CC wants Cameron and New York will get him. The Brewers will not budge which is a great thing. This may last another week until Cashman realizes the Crew are not going to give in.
The Brewers are in control here. They know CC told the Yankees to get Cameron and the Yankees are trying to get him for very very cheap.
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Cameron should only bat against LH pitchers. As such, he is overpaid.
Posted by: Rich | December 15, 2008 at 12:24 PM
ROFL...because the Yanks refuse to overpay for Cameron. I would be more than happy to overpay for a MAJOR STAR vs a guy like Cameron who doesn't have anyone knocking on the Brewers door for, as it seems.
Worse case scenario:
The Yanks don't make the trade and go another year w/ Melky/Garnder who may not hit for much but will provide viable defense.
vs
The Brewers stuck w/ Cameron for $10 mil as their second highest player, with much bigger needs that need to be addressed and, an owner who doesn't want to committ any of CC's dollars to signing other players.
Who has the leverage in your opinion? Can the Brews trade Cameron to any other team and NOT have to pick up some of the salary?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:25 PM
It wouldn't be that bad of an idea to take Igawa+full contract and Melky Cabrera for Mike Cameron. Obviously, they lose the offense and power from CF, and they lose a little defense at said spot, but they also practically get a rotation candidate in Igawa. I don't think he's a bust yet, just that he needs to get out of the spotlight in New York.
Although, if Sabathia is pushing for this trade since they're 'buddies', then the Yankees paying all of Cameron and most of Igawa's contract will happen.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | December 15, 2008 at 12:27 PM
YanksfanSince78: You are missing the point why would the Brewers want to only save $6 million dollars on a solid CF. Is Cameron great not even close but at least he's a ML average CF. Getting Igawa and having him cut 40% into your savings is not exactly a good thing. Igawa has not proven he can pitch in the majors could easily become a distration for the Brewers like he is in NY. Does he have some upside could a change of scenery help? sure but its far from certain. I'd rather make a trade with the Cubs for Marquis and pay him $6 million (cubs eating $4) than pay Igawa $4 million. At least you know Marquis can be league average (not always is but an upgrade over Igawa). Also Igawa is signed for the next 3 years for a total of $12 million. So yeah the Brewers save $6 million this year but will pay $8 million over the next 2 years. And yes that would be worth it if Igawa could be in the rotation for the next couple years but if he's just as big of a bust and the Brewers cut him than they would have lost money.
Posted by: Steveo26 | December 15, 2008 at 12:28 PM
I don't understand why the Yankees are demanding the Brewers take on their mistake. Drop Igawa from the conversation and make the deal.
Posted by: MPM | December 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM
ECT wrote:
YFS78, think he was referring to the 2 years of options that Manny had declined which would have been 2/40. Anyway the melky+igawa for cameron wouldnt have been 14m really as Igawa's contract is 3/12 so the real cost of the transaction would be $6m
__________________________
I know what he said. He said Man-NY should have stayed with Boston and played out the last 2 years and earned another $40 mil and that now he may have to take a cut.
Man-NY can easily sign right now for more than $40 mil. The DOdgers have offered him a 2 year $45 mil and have hinted that they would add an extra year to make it a 3 yr deal @ $20 mil +. The Yanks might be willing to go $2/50 if they want to pass on Tex.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM
What people seem to be overlooking here is that Igawa actually has NEGATIVE value, given his current contract. He was outrighted to the minors and cleared waivers. Any team could have picked him, either when that happened, or in the Rule 5 draft, but no one wanted him at that salary.
Posted by: Bill | December 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM
Yeah....CC is going to turn down $161 mil because they didn't trade for Cameron.
The Brewers signed Cameron hoping that would be a positive for CC to resign with them. Now they are stuck with him and his $10 mil owed. Had CC made it clear he wasn't coming back then they never would've picked up his option. Explain to me how the Brews have the leverage?
Worse case the Yanks can stick with Melky/Gardner in CF for another year. Can the Brews find anyone else to take all of Cameron's salary? I doubt it. Both teams have a need but the Yanks have more options.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Yeah but the Yanks are resolved to having him stay in the minors and be a last minute resort in case of injuries, etc. We can afford to eat his salary. Can the Brews afford to ear Cameron's?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:36 PM
"Keep in mind that Ibanez, one of the most sought after cheeper bats, signed for $10 mil per w/ the Phillies."
Also keep in mind that Raul Ibanez is 37, signed for three seasons and is AWFUL in left field. Meanwhile, Cameron is 36, signed for one season, and was pretty damn good in center last season.
Remember about defense..
There is simply no reason for the Yankees to ask the Brewers to take on money. Cameron is definitely worth 1/10, and they aren't exactly giving up a ton of value in Melky Cabrera.
As for the deal though, I like it for New York. Let Cammy play through the contract and let Austin Jackson take over in 2010, and then use the saved money from losing Matsui and Damon to sign Matt Holliday to a massive deal. Yea.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 12:36 PM
The issue here is who has the leverage?
The Brewers are apparently desperate to rid themselves of what amounts to a sixth of their payroll for 2009, given that they're likely giving up until 2010, it would be unacceptable to go over budget on a team guaranteed to lose.
Who wants Cameron? The only teams with holes in centerfield are, perhaps, the White Sox and Oakland. If they had any interest whatsoever, don't you think you would have seen them mentioned in these trade rumors? The fact remains that the Brewers have exactly one option to go to if they want to unload Cameron. The Yankees have several options if they want to fill centerfield.
The Yankees have all the leverage, that's why you're seeing rumors of Igawa or significant money going the Yankee's way to cover Cameron's contract. You think if the Brewers had any other trade partners they'd have already settled for Melky?
Posted by: AndrewYF | December 15, 2008 at 12:40 PM
"Can the Brews find anyone else to take all of Cameron's salary? I doubt it. Both teams have a need but the Yanks have more options."
Maybe not all $10M, but someone would definitely eat $7-9M of it.
Keep in mind who is currently on the free agent market. You got.. Jim Edmonds? Rocco Baldelli? Corey Patterson? Willy Taveras?
When you look at the free agent market, I think there is no doubt that some team would be willing to take on Cameron on a one year deal.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 12:40 PM
The Yanks do need bat. last season the y had problems scoring runs and they lost Giambi and Abreu. If they don't get a big bat, those pitching upgrades won't do much.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 15, 2008 at 12:50 PM
If only the Twins where in the NL they could take Igawa and start him successfully.
Posted by: slashieboy | December 15, 2008 at 12:50 PM
scribble: The debate isn't Ibanez vs Cameron. Ibanez's value lies with his bat. Cameron's value, supposedly, is his glove and friendship w/ CC. If you assume all of Cam's salary and all of Igawa's 09 money and give them two players, regardless of their production, is too much to pay for Cameron.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM
And keep in mind that, according to reports, Melvin asked about Igawa after Cash told him he wasn't getting rid of any pitchers on the 40 man roster. Now it's just a matter of talking salary, not players. People are acting if the Yanks are trying to dump Igawa on the Brews.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 12:53 PM
I don't think the Brewers are as desperate to unload Cameron as most think.
If this trade doesn't go through, they can just hold onto him and get a much, much better player than Cabrera in the draft, if Cameron is a Type B FA again next year.
Or they can trade him at the deadline or sooner if a contender suffers a key injury or underperformance.
Posted by: bretsky07 | December 15, 2008 at 12:54 PM
"When you look at the free agent market, I think there is no doubt that some team would be willing to take on Cameron on a one year deal."
Oh really? Who?
Posted by: AndrewYF | December 15, 2008 at 12:55 PM
When you run the numbers the least effective solution is to sign Tex and keep Melky in CF.
It's not that Melky is bad in the outfield, his metrics actually suggest he is worse than just a placeholder. He has negative value. When your VORP is sitting at -6 life is not good.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 15, 2008 at 12:57 PM
"The debate isn't Ibanez vs Cameron. Ibanez's value lies with his bat. Cameron's value, supposedly, is his glove and friendship w/ CC."
But Cameron is actually a very solid hitter as well. In center field, a .250/.330/.480 line is quite good. Cameron's value lies in his bat as well. If you don't care about hitting then just give the job to Gardner.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 01:01 PM
Cabrera, Igawa for Cameron and Hall?
Igawa and Hall both have bad contracts to even out the deal...
Posted by: KG2577 | December 15, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Fenton from Philly, that is the main reason you need a guy like Manny hitting behind him. It would change the whole season to have Manny hitting 4th.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 15, 2008 at 01:05 PM
"I'm not sure how the Yankees have managed to steer the conversation toward Cameron being overpaid. He's not, and a fair baseball trade would involve the Yankees paying all of Cameron's salary while giving up something useful."
Amen, Tim. Although I question whether the Yankees have steered the negotiations in that direction or just the media coverage of the negotiations in that direction.
As far as we know, the Brewers may be reading these accounts and laughing hysterically at the notion that they would have to take Kei Igawa AND pay him.
Posted by: elguapo | December 15, 2008 at 01:05 PM
"The Yanks do need bat. last season the y had problems scoring runs and they lost Giambi and Abreu. If they don't get a big bat, those pitching upgrades won't do much."
They need a bat, but not Cameron's.
Posted by: Rich | December 15, 2008 at 01:15 PM
I don't think the Brewers are as desperate to unload Cameron as most think.
If this trade doesn't go through, they can just hold onto him and get a much, much better player than Cabrera in the draft, if Cameron is a Type B FA again next year.
Or they can trade him at the deadline or sooner if a contender suffers a key injury or underperformance.
-----------------------------
Exactly a point I am trying to make. The Brewers are not desperate to move him at all. That is why Milwaukee has some leverage here. They know CC demands that the Yankees get Cameron and that is why Melvin is not budging over this current deal.
Thank you at least someone knows what the Brewers are thinking. Everyone else here believes that the Brewers don't have any leverage. They do!
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 01:17 PM
I am jealous, I really wish the Reds had a chance to pick up Mike Cameron, I think he will play well above average on the New York Stage....I hate the Yankees but you guys are shaping up nicely besides you infield left side defense Jeter and Arod, that is your only weakness. You all better hope the pitching holds up and CC doesn't look like he did for the Indians last season.
Posted by: Robert | December 15, 2008 at 01:19 PM
I would be pissed if I was a Brewers fan.
Posted by: Robert | December 15, 2008 at 01:19 PM
I would be pissed if I was a Brewers fan.
----------------------------
Ahhhh yes, I am pissed
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 01:24 PM
YFS78: Sure maybe the Brewers wanted Igawa after the Yankees 40 man roster was considered off limits but they don't want his contract. So its simple either the Yankees can give up Coke and Melky for Cameron and keep Igawa's contract. Or give up Igawa pay for the contract and keep Coke. This is what every other fan is saying, the Yankees should be lucky they don't have to give up anything really of value. The Brewers are looking for a little salary relief and hoping one of the two projects pans out. I mean basically what you are saying is you'd trade Matsui for Pierre. That is a similar senario Yankee's "save money" b/c Matsui makes more this year than Pierre. The real difference in this situation is that Pierre while over paid is a Major League ball player. Igawa is over paid and has no success in the majors.
Posted by: Steveo26 | December 15, 2008 at 01:27 PM
25 hrs 70 rbis .808 OPS is not bad (for a center fielder) despite missing about a month. Also take into consideration the solid defensive he brings which the yanks desperately need. As a Mets fan I can't say anything bad about Cameron. I'd give them Church for Cameron back.
Posted by: enut | December 15, 2008 at 01:34 PM
I don't think the Brewers are as desperate to unload Cameron as most think.
If this trade doesn't go through, they can just hold onto him and get a much, much better player than Cabrera in the draft, if Cameron is a Type B FA again next year.
Or they can trade him at the deadline or sooner if a contender suffers a key injury or underperformance.
-----------------------------
Exactly a point I am trying to make. The Brewers are not desperate to move him at all. That is why Milwaukee has some leverage here. They know CC demands that the Yankees get Cameron and that is why Melvin is not budging over this current deal.
Thank you at least someone knows what the Brewers are thinking. Everyone else here believes that the Brewers don't have any leverage. They do!
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 01:17 PM
No way. Its the Yankees that have leverage. The brewers who have lost their two best pitchers in CC and Sheets need to unload Cameron and his 10 million dollar salary for money to spend on pitching. Where as the yankees dont NEED to make this deal but it would be an upgrade.
Posted by: Dynasty26 | December 15, 2008 at 01:35 PM
Does anyone know or have a guess as to the Brewers' payroll budget this year?
Posted by: AndrewYF | December 15, 2008 at 01:49 PM
The only reason the Brewers picked up Camerons option was a desperate attempt to lure CC back to them. The Yankees were already discussing signing Cameron if the Brewers did not pick up that option except somehow the media got wind of that so the Brewers did not want to give CC another reason to go to the Yankees and picked up the option.
The Brewers are definitely desperate to get rid of Cameron and anything in return would be considered a bonus. The fact that they get a decent young player in return in Melky is like hitting the lottery for them right now. There was probably nobody in baseball that would have considered signing Cameron if he became a free agent besides the Yankees.
Point...the Brewers were hoping bringing back Cameron would land CC....it didn't work now they are stuck with paying him 10 mil and they desperately need to free up that money so they can spend it elsewhere. And until they free up the money the free agents they were targeting (Wood, Fuentes, Sheets) will continue to sign elsewhere. The Yankees are in the position of power because they do not necessarily need Cameron and are in no rush to acquire him because the Brewers have no place else to unload him.
Posted by: yanks09 | December 15, 2008 at 01:54 PM
The only reason the Brewers picked up Camerons option was a desperate attempt to lure CC back to them.
-----------------------------
Or Cameron is above average both offensively and defensively for a CF and the Brewers had no internal options (Gwynn Jr is not an option) and the CF market is weak.
Do you really think CC would be that much more likely to sign a 5-7 year contract because one player he is friends with is going to be on that team for 1 year?
Posted by: bretsky07 | December 15, 2008 at 02:02 PM
I remember reading Melvin's comments when he re-signed Cameron. He said he was worth the $10 million and is a great CF with a veteran presence. They are NOT desperate to get rid of Cameron's contract.
the Brewers are looking at pitchers like Randy Johnson, Randy Wolf, and John Smoltz. They will not need to clear up payroll to sign any of those guys. We may solve our closer problem in house with McClung.
We need another LH bat. They will sign a couple of pitchers and may have one via a trade of Prince or JJ.
Bottom line is, the Brewers know Cameron is worth the money. That is why they signed him. I know his signing was an act to lure CC into signing with Milwaukee.
Melvin would not have a problem keeping Cameron. He is only signed for one year. By then they will get a quality CF in return via free agency next year or a trade.
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 02:02 PM
"There was probably nobody in baseball that would have considered signing Cameron if he became a free agent besides the Yankees."
You are crazy if you think that is true.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 15, 2008 at 02:03 PM
I think that all of this whole debate is unreal, IGAWA SUCKS for one, Melkys alright, Camerons old, take Igawa out, take Kennedy and Melky and give us Billy Hall along with Cammy, another Sabathia buddy, NY World Champs for 2009!
Posted by: CCyaintheWS0712 | December 15, 2008 at 02:42 PM
This, if even true, proves that Cashman has no clue how to do his job.
I would rather pay Cameron $10 mil to sit on my bench than pay $1.00 for Igawa to lose 20 games.
Posted by: celtics464 | December 15, 2008 at 02:49 PM
To say the Yanks won't in a world series because Arod can't hit is the dumbest take I've ever heard. There are 24 other players including 8 hother hitters. Poor pitching has been the biggest reason why we don't have #27.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 02:52 PM
Ok really? If the Brews hold on to Cameron they have to pay his salary. Even if they traded him in mid-season what do you think someone would give you for a 36 year old guy, owed millions headed into FA? C'mon be realistic.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 02:54 PM
YFS78: Sure maybe the Brewers wanted Igawa after the Yankees 40 man roster was considered off limits but they don't want his contract. So its simple either the Yankees can give up Coke and Melky for Cameron and keep Igawa's contract. Or give up Igawa pay for the contract and keep Coke. This is what every other fan is saying, the Yankees should be lucky they don't have to give up anything really of value. The Brewers are looking for a little salary relief and hoping one of the two projects pans out. I mean basically what you are saying is you'd trade Matsui for Pierre. That is a similar senario Yankee's "save money" b/c Matsui makes more this year than Pierre. The real difference in this situation is that Pierre while over paid is a Major League ball player. Igawa is over paid and has no success in the majors.
___________________________
How do you figure? Yanks don't need Pierre (see Gardner) and Matsui, if healthy, is good for 25 hrs and 90 rbis? You're comparison doesn't match at all.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 02:57 PM
I think Cameron for Cabrera w/ the Yanks assuming all of Cameron's salary is the best it's going to get.
I have a question. If Igawa were included are they asking the Yanks to pay all of his salary or just the 09 amount?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Actually the Brewers ARE desperate to unload Cameron. The Brewers problems are not on the offensive or defensive right now. There problem is they have no pitching whatsoever. Gallardo is a good young pitcher but so far has not proven he can stay off the DL. Sheets carried the pitching staff there first half of the season, CC carried the pitching staff the second half, both are gone. The Brewers have little to no money to spend right now which is why they so desperately need to get of Cameron so they can chase someone like Randy Wolf or Randy Johnson....both of who are going to about 8 mil (roughly the same as Camerons contract) to get to sign. If the Brewers want to compete in 2009 they need to unload Cameron asap so they can fill their other needs. No team has a chance unless they have a solid pitching staff.
So again the Brewers are obviously the ones desperate to make a move, not the Yankees. If the Yankees don't acquire Cameron they still have a great defensive option (gardner) in center and more than enough offense in the 1-8 spots in the order. Now if the Brewers don't unload Cameron they are forced to settle for the team they have now without upgrading their pitching and basically go into another rebuilding process. Which team sounds like the one with leverage?
Posted by: yanks09 | December 15, 2008 at 03:14 PM
"Is he worth 10 million? I don't know about that."
An elite centerfielder who has power/speed, and will give you an 800 OPS on a one year deal. Yeah, I don't know if that is worth 10 million. You're kidding right?
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 03:17 PM
"I find it very odd that the Yankees want to spend almost $25 M on Swisher, Cameron, and Pettitte rather than signing Tex."
Again, filling 3 holes for the price of one is very odd. Especially when that 'one' you would prefer them to sign is going to become an albatross of a contract sooner or later. Give me Cameron/Swisher/Pettitte over Tex any time.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 03:19 PM
yanks09:
Unloading Cameron doesn't matter at all. You seriously think the Brewers picking up Cameron's contract would make CC pick the Brewers for $61 million less?
Also, Gallardo wasn't pitching - he COLLIDED at first base and tore his ACL. He can definitely stay off the DL.
Posted by: korrupt03 | December 15, 2008 at 03:40 PM
At the end of the day I feel that if the Yanks see Cameron as being that important then I'm sure they will work it out. However, I take exception with some of the attitudes here. If the brews wanted Melky AND a pitcher, and the Cash said anyone on the 40 was off limits and somehow Igawa's name came into play then in what world would it make sense for us to eat his contract as well?
As good as Cameron is , is he worth $10 mil owed to him, $12 mil owed to Igawa AND Melky, a 24 yr old inexpensive servicable CF?
Am I missing something? Not saying that Igawa will ever become anything special but why would we take $10 mil off the Brews books AND pay Igawa to play for another team?
If I'm wrong in the thinking that they wanted the Yanks to assume ALL of the remaining 12 mil over 3 years then please tell me. Otherwise that's insane. I know the Yanks have money to burn but Cameron isn't worth $22 mil, Igawa and Melky which is what it boils down to.
Can someone help correct me if my thinking is off in terms of what they want the Yanks to pay towards Igawa's remaining 3/12 contract?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Signing a gold glove CF to replace the blackhole that has been there for 2 years is going to stop you from getting Manny? No. Johnny Damon, Hideki Matsui, Xavier Nady, Jorge Posada will stop you from getting Manny. Not finally having a legit CF on your roster.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Seriously...for the record. Melky is not a bad defensive CF.
No please. Can some answer my question? Are they asking the Yanks to pay the entire 12 m left on Igawa's contract or just the 09 salary?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 04:25 PM
The reason that Brewer fans(at least myself) believe the Yanks should take on Igawa's contract is the fact that the Yanks are unwilling to give up anything besides Igawa as pitching. It pins the Crew into a corner.
Its the same old argument of the big boys pushing the little guys around. Why should the Brewers have to pay for Igawa when thats all we can get?
Also the Crew does not have to get rid of Cam. Why? because Attanasio can use some the the CC money to pay for pitchers. The reason Cam is expendable is because it lowers the cost that our owner needs to pay. If you knew anything about Mark A. you'd know every year the Crews payroll has increased every year since taking over.
Posted by: cjm86 | December 15, 2008 at 04:33 PM
"An elite centerfielder who has power/speed, and will give you an 800 OPS on a one year deal. Yeah, I don't know if that is worth 10 million. You're kidding right?"
Finally, where were you earlier? I kept saying that's a steal and if the Yankees don't land him someone else could, because Cameron is a very good player on a very fair contract, for only one season. The Yankees have a center fielder in AA who will be ready in late 2009 or 2010. Gee, I think a good one year stop gap would be good considering they just spent $282.5 million on pitching, they might as well go all in next season considering how much salary they dropped at the end of the season.
Cameron is a plus defensive CF with 25 HR power, with a decent .330-.340 OBP, and good speed on the bases. On a one year deal for just $10M, when the other options on the free agent market are Jim Edmonds, Rocco Baldelli, Willy Taveras, Corey Patterson, and other options that don't exactly appear to be everyday options.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 04:34 PM
YanksFanSince78, you're wrong to view Igawa's contract as a cost to the Yankess in doing this deal. They will pay this money whether or not they make the deal.
Igawa with his current contract has negative value, as another commenter noted. So unless the Yankees pick up a sizable chunk of the contract, he's not going anywhere, Milwaukee or otherwise, and you're still looking at paying the $12M.
Igawa without a long-term commitment presumably has some minimal value, since the Brewers are asking. But he only has that value when you separate him from the Yanks' commitment to him, which is what the Brewers are asking for.
Posted by: robdeer | December 15, 2008 at 04:36 PM
I am not sure on that one. Apparently they said the financials were worked out but the other player is yet to be decided upon. Looks like the Yankees are going to pay the $ but giving another player is yet to be determined.
I still think we should trade Hall and Cameron for Kennedy and Cabrera.
If you guys are going to re-sign Pettite, then why not get rid of Kennedy. Also, what about other pitchers in AAA besided Igawa?
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 04:36 PM
Cameron for Kennedy and Cabrera would be fair enough. but only if the yanks pay all of camerons salary
Posted by: BrewCrew87 | December 15, 2008 at 04:37 PM
I think camron makes some sense but not as much as a move for david dejesus, iam just so tryed of seeing yankees strike out or pop up with risp(thanks giambi)
dejesus had something like a .417 avg with risp and like 75 rbis in the leadoff whole while putting up a over .300 ba.
and he maby not be as good as camron in center but its not like camron blows him away out there
The yanks can prolly have dejesus for kennedy, melky and a relif pitcher like veres, i dont understand why they wouldnt move on that insted of camron, someone please tell me why?
Posted by: James Alipo | December 15, 2008 at 04:55 PM
YanksFanSince78, you're wrong to view Igawa's contract as a cost to the Yankess in doing this deal. They will pay this money whether or not they make the deal.
Igawa with his current contract has negative value, as another commenter noted. So unless the Yankees pick up a sizable chunk of the contract, he's not going anywhere, Milwaukee or otherwise, and you're still looking at paying the $12M.
Igawa without a long-term commitment presumably has some minimal value, since the Brewers are asking. But he only has that value when you separate him from the Yanks' commitment to him, which is what the Brewers are asking for.
______________________________
That's a silly arguement. So if I'm going to eat all of Igawa's contract then I might as well keep him and add depth to my pitching staff in the minors in case of injuries. If Melvin doesn't want Igawa, and the article said the Brews asked about Igawa, then let him choose another non-40 guy. The arguement that we should eat both Cameron and Igawa's contract and give up Melky is ridiculous. That's $22 mil.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 05:15 PM
There's no way I would trade Kennedy and Melky for Cameron or Cameron/Hall. If the Yanks didn't trade Melk and Kennedy for Santana they would look foolish to do it for those two. I could careless what the "perception" is of Kennedy. 9 bad mlb starts doesn't make him a bust. The Yanks would be better served in letting him pitch in AAA and be available in case of injuries or to let his value restore and use him as part of another deal. Even if you envision him as being a 4th or 5th (Jon Garland type) he can be of value to someone.
I'd rather the Yanks pull the trade and let's see how the Brews can move him to someone else.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Your worries will continue if you sign Cameron. He strikes out a TONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
not to mention the weak pop up to left
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 05:21 PM
James: DeJesus will cose the Yanks a lot more than Melky, Kennedy and Veras.
I'm trapped between non-Yankee fans that undervalue guys like Melk and Kennedy and Yankee fans who think we can rob other teams for their best players. Aye caramba!!!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 05:22 PM
"DeJesus will cose the Yanks a lot more than Melky, Kennedy and Veras."
That's probably true, but not by much. DeJesus isn't under control for much longer, and you'd be getting multiple years of Melky, Kennedy and Veras.
Maybe a deal like Romine and Aceves for DeJesus and a low level guy, or Kennedy, Aceves/Coke, and a third prospect.
I just don't think the Royals would have much interest in Melky, considering they already have Guillen, Crisp, Teahen, Butler, as well as the fact that Mike Moustakas will likely have to move to left field because of Alex Gordon.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 15, 2008 at 05:42 PM
I'd rather trade Melky and Kennedy for Coco.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 05:46 PM
Wow.
You'd rather have Crisp than Cameron?
Did Cameron run over your dog or something?
Posted by: brewtown | December 15, 2008 at 06:30 PM
At least the latest update is no Igawa. Would be nice to get Kennedy and Cabrera for Hall and Cameron.
Posted by: craig | December 15, 2008 at 06:42 PM
id rather have crisp than cameron... but anyways, why in gods name would they ever give up hall too..? hes pretty valuable as he can play any position pretty much
Posted by: GoSoX | December 15, 2008 at 06:42 PM
speaking of crisp i bet they could trade for a royals plyer for outfielf but they probly wuldnt want melky so hed hafta stay or go elsewhere
Posted by: GoSoX | December 15, 2008 at 06:46 PM
I wish somebody would give me just one reason why they would prefer Crisp to Cameron. I mean, Cameron is a far superior hitter, they are both great fielders (although Crips noodle arm doesn't help), and they both run the bases well. The fielding and baserunning area's seem to be a push, where Cameron is much more valuable as a hitter.
Posted by: nrmax88 | December 15, 2008 at 07:05 PM
coco over cameron? this is funny. you ppl are misinformed
Posted by: BrewCrew87 | December 15, 2008 at 07:09 PM
(Sniff, sniff)..Yes he did. Poor little Rufus....
Yes I would like to have Crisp over Cameron. He's not better than Cameron defeinsvely but he's a very good defender, he brings good offense and could be a good replacement for Damon in 2010 in the leadoff spot, is cheeper:
09:$5.75M, 10:$8M club option ($0.5M buyout)
and younger @ 29.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 07:12 PM
Look you people seem to think Cameron is the 2nd coming of Willie Howard Mays, Jr. If you think that way, so be it, I won't try to argue against you but Coco is a very good player. I had the pleasure of watching him here in Cleveland and was always impressed with his game. He's a hustler on the field as well.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 07:15 PM
hes also a little bich
Posted by: BrewCrew87 | December 15, 2008 at 07:17 PM
You people rate players stricly according to stats as if this is some sort of fantasy league. I look at a player in terms of how do they fit in with my team. Johnny Damon turns 36 and needs to replaced when he becomes a free agent next year and we let him walk. I think Coco, despite not having a great obp, could be a good replacement for Damon short term until Jackson, who is talented yet unproven, shows what he can do. He can play CF or LF. He can give you 25-30 stolen bases, 10-15 hrs, 30-40 doubles, doesn;t strike out as much as Cameron, plays good defense and is 7 years younger and 5 mil cheeper. Offensively, what does Cameron do MUCH better than Coco other than hit a few more Hrs?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 07:22 PM
Why would you call Coco a b***? Did he lay the pipe on your girl or something???
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 15, 2008 at 07:24 PM
cuz he woulda got his butt kicked by grant balfour until he did by johnny gomes instead, and he always runs his mouth, and he wouldnt be able to fight his way out of a wet paper bag. that my friend, is a definition of a little bich. little man syndrome, cant bak urself up, so u feel the need to talk urself up
Posted by: BrewCrew87 | December 15, 2008 at 07:30 PM
"what does Cameron do MUCH better than Coco other than hit a few more Hrs?"
Try a LOT more HRs. And a few more doubles. And he's nearly as good at stealing bases. And he's still a very good defensive CF.
What does Crisp do better than Cameron? He doesn't strike out as much. That's about it. And it's not like Crisp is making the minimum either. He's owed $5.75M for 2009, with a 2010 option at $8M ($0.5M buyout).
Posted by: mac_1103 | December 15, 2008 at 07:34 PM
It will be fantastic when the yanks fall flat on their face just like last year!!!
Posted by: Brewcrew4life | December 15, 2008 at 07:44 PM
brewcrew4life
right on brother. right on. yanks still have no hitting to compete in the AL East. CC will be good for about 15 wins. but then Burnett will suck it up, wang will get hurt, joba will go back to the pen after struggling as a starter to make it 6 innings on a regular basis.
Posted by: BrewCrew87 | December 15, 2008 at 07:58 PM
Even as a Mets fan, to say that about the Yanks rotation makes me laugh. Seriously?
I would set CC's over/under number at 18 in year one.
Burnett has a better chance of getting hurt as opposed to sucking it up, could K 200+.
Wang won 19 in back to back years and would have for a third straight if not for a freak injury while running the bases.
Joba struggled to go 6 because they did not properly stretch him out after he was an 8th inning guy. He should not have a problem and could be a monster...
but who knows, your assessment could be right.
On the note of Cameron, I loved this guy when he was with the Mets, he was gritty and played an excellent CF before that collision with Beltran ended the Met tenure. Yea the avg is low, and K's are high, but he hit for pop and was a fun player to route for. It has been nearly 4 years now, but for one year, he could help the Yanks hitting low in that lineup.
Posted by: MrMet | December 15, 2008 at 08:12 PM