MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Teixeira Rumor Shot Down | Main | Yankees Pursuing Manny »

Mike Cameron Yankees Rumors

SUNDAY, 1:51pm: George A. King III with the New York Post writes that the Yankees want the Brewers to take on Igawa's contract as well, but that Milwaukee doesn't want to pay much of the $12MM he has left. The Brewers are trading Cameron to trim payroll, and don't want to unload $10MM for Cameron just to take on another $4MM for Igawa.

New York has told Milwaukee that no pitcher on their 40-man roster is available.  Both sides still expect a deal to get done eventually; Doug Melvin told Tom Haudricourt talks will resume tomorrow.  River Ave. Blues thinks the Yankees should hold off, for now.

FRIDAY, 3:50pm: Haudricourt heard this might get tabled until Monday, though now with Burnett signed maybe the Yankees will switch their focus.  Or maybe they'll spend the weekend working on Andy Pettitte/celebrating the Burnett signing.

THURSDAY, 5:40pm: Haudricourt now writes that the Cameron negotiations are back underway after a "hiccup". Haudricourt heard from Doug Melvin that there's a "strong possibility it could still happen." The clubs are negotiating over finances and whether a second player would go to the Brewers with Cabrera.

1:01pm: Cameron's agent told Tyler Kepner nothing has been completed.  Kepner says the Brewers have actually been asking about Igawa.

11:49am: Joel Sherman talked to a top exec involved in the talks who called the chances of a deal "remote." Kevin Baxter of the L.A. Times was told the deal is done, however.

11:17am: Ken Rosenthal says the potential deal hit a roadblock over the Yankees' desire to have Milwaukee pick up part of the tab on Cameron.  Also, the Brewers want a second player after Cabrera.  Tom Haudricourt says the Yankees tried to unload Kei Igawa on them.

9:28am: The Cabrera for Cameron deal is close but not done, according to Joel Sherman's source.  He says the Brewers could receive a pitcher as well, with the quality depending on whether they'll assume salary.

8:41am: Tom Haudricourt is not sure this is done. He says the Yankees like Bill Hall as well.  The Brewers could gain quite a bit of payroll flexibility here.  It'd be interesting to see all three Brewers friends (including Sabathia) move to the Yanks.

7:15am: Mark Feinsand of the New York Daily News says the Yankees are set to acquire Cameron for Cabrera.

12:55am: According to Dan Graziano of the Newark Star-Ledger, the Yankees met with the Brewers Wednesday to resume trade talks for Mike Cameron that began at the GM Meetings.  Whatever mild concern the Brewers reportedly had about trading away a friend of C.C. Sabathia's is gone.

On November 7th, Peter Abraham wrote that Ian Kennedy and Melky Cabrera were on the Brewers' radar.  Clearly the Brewers want to add a starting pitcher.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105365276d7970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mike Cameron Yankees Rumors:

Comments

Now this shall be interesting

As a baseball fan it would be sad to see a team that has done everything right and come so close to being a legit contender every year be forced to start over. Their bullpen is a disaster, but if they can address it without commiting 3-4 years and just get by the 09 season i think they will be right back near the top of the central in 2010.

the brewers went for it last year and now might be forced to go into the rebuilding stage. they ought to trade prince fielder as well for some young arms and jj hardy as well.

Where is my boy YanksfanSince78!?!?!?!?!

They really don't have to rebuild. They can just restock the farm with all the picks they are going to have this year. This team still have Ryan Braun, Corey Hart, Prince Fielder, JJ Hardy, Manny Parra, Yovani Gallardo, and a solid farm and if they draft some college talent this year they can have guys close to ML ready and like chicubs25 said, be back to competing again in 2010.

Why do they pick up these trash players.I think its good for the brewers, maybe Melky will be better with out Cano.

This is a dumb move by the Yanks. While they gave up on Melky they could have held him to package him for something more than a 35 year old OF that K's more than I would.
Its being reported that this is a done deal. Stupid.

Can we please look into Rick Ankiel instead of mike friggin cameron

eh.. really? Whats the big deal about Mike Cameron? I know the yanks have had a hard-on for him since his seattle days.. but really?

Casanova...I agree!

This is an excellent move for the Yankees. It serves as a 1 year stop-gap for Austin Jackson who is hopefully ready to take over in 2010.

Melky was never going to make it here and his trade value has never been lower and would not have been any major part of any trade package. This serves a need and as all of us Yankee fans have seen so far this offseason is that this winter we are all about serving needs.. Despite who likes it or not.

ALL WERE GETTING IS MELKY??? He sucks. I hope that the report is wrong, and that we get kennedy. We'll Even throw in bill hall!

"While they gave up on Melky they could have held him to package him for something more than a 35 year old OF that K's more than I would."

Like what? Cabrera's OPS+ has gone from 95 to 89 to 68. He hit 249/301/341 last year and finally had to be demoted. He looked so lost at the plate toward the end that you probably would have been a pretty good bet to outhit him. He's out of options, so if the Yankees do keep him, they're likely to lose him for nothing if they were to decide he could use some time at AAA. He has ZERO trade value right now. A GM who could get a bucket of new baseballs for him instead of used ones would have to be a pure genius.

I'm not crazy about Cameron, either, but the fear here shouldn't be about not getting enough back for Melky. I'm worried about how much more they might be giving up.

I like that move. Gave up a 4th OFer for a stop gap who is great defensively and has pop.

I don't think people understand that Cameron is a one year rental player, until Austin Jackson is ready to play next year. The yanks gain a better bat and the defense is about equal and it looks like Melky peaked in 07. I like the trade for the yanks.

He obviously does NOT have ZERO trade value if they are trading him to the Brewers.

"We'll Even throw in bill hall!"

Why would you do that? Seriously. Your team has a mounting list of needs and he's got to be worth something to someone. I realize that he's fallen off a cliff, but at least he'll still put one in the seats once in a while.

I don't understand why lesser teams trade MLer for throw aways to the Yankees.

Nady and Marte for throw aways, Swisher for throw aways, and now (maybe)Cameron for throw aways. If I was milwaukee with problems in my bullpen, I would trade for McAllister, Aceves, or even Kennedy before I need a 4th OFer.

"He obviously does NOT have ZERO trade value if they are trading him to the Brewers."

That brilliant. Look, the point is that getting a real live major league baseball player for Melky Cabrera straight up should be somewhere around 34,659 on the list of things for Yankee fans to complain about.

Wow how Melky has fallen. From untouchable to being traded for Mike "strikeout" Cameron. Yanks had better hope for bounce back years from Cano, Swisher, Matsui and Posada or you could find teams pitching around them some.

"I don't understand why lesser teams trade MLer for throw aways to the Yankees."

Usually it's because they don't want to pay them any more.

Yes, its understood that its a stop gap. However there are a few problems with that.
First, who knows if Ajax will be ready next year. Yea, he is a top prospect, but I can give you a list of top prospects that never lived up to their billing.
Second, Cameron is "all or nothing". I can watch Melky or Gardner K for much less money.
Third..when you have the lineup the Yanks do, a #9 hitter batting .250 shouldnt make much of a difference. Gardner could play CF for the year, give us speed on the bases and a guy that can move runners over. If nothing else HE could have been used as the stop gap and then traded if he did well.
The idea was to get younger and adding a 10 million dollar 35 year old OF does not fit into that mindset.

True, Aj will be ready next year, and to plug somone in CF for a year is a good thing untill he is ready, but, why trade for mike cameron? If defense is on the yankkes mind, well melkys defense is solid. they will both hit 240 so whats the big difference here?
Keep mike cameron, not that melky is a better alternative, but why even bother making the trade. I can see it now, man on 2nd and 3rd, 2 out , cameron at the plate.... WHIIIFFFF, give me league minimun, i can even do that!

All this means is that Austin Jackson is going to need at least a 1/2 a full season if not a full season before he is called up.

As far as the merits of Melky vs. Cameron, Cameron is the better defender, better power hitter, better OBP, and steals more bases.

Melky on the other hand, hits for a slightly better average and is younger, but out of options so all of is learning has to be done on the MLB roster...

Good deal, with Cameron only stuck in NY for 1 year.

Cameron gets to be with his buddy CC again. Almost kind of a package deal Yankee fans have to accept. :)

I personally hate this move. Melky had the potential to be a great back of the lineup hitter, probably looking at around .275 to .285 with mid-teens home runs. He needed somebody on his ass to make him drop some of pounds and get quicker on the base paths, he was already playing fantastic defense. I don't buy into Austin Jackson, maybe I'm the only one, but he isn't looking like the next big thing. Sure, he will be a quality player, but I don't even see him as a future All-Star, let alone the next coming of Vernon Wells or Grady Sizemore. I'd much rather have Melky out there and using Jackson and all his hype to get us a real all-star, maybe a deal to bring in another starter so we can save that money we'd spend on Burnett/Lowe and get Teixeira...

"Gave up a 4th OFer for a stop gap who is great defensively..."

Is Cameron still great defensively? Serious question.

You Yankee fans who think Melky Cabrera would actually fetch something of merit are delusioned.

I'm a huge Yankee fan. Cabrera is not a good player. He is a plus defender with no bat, whatsoever. Cameron is 3x the player Melky is and gives them an affordable, productive stopgap in CF until Jackson is ready.

This is a GREAT trade for the Yankees. I cannot believe how overrated Melky has become in NY. He is nothing more than a 4th outfielder/defensive replacement. Cameron is a guy who produces runs and plays great defense. I love this deal for NY.

"they will both hit 240 so whats the big difference here"

30 points of OBP and 130 points of slugging. Plus, Melky is truly atrocious from the right side and Cameron hits lefties well. So he mixes and matches better with Gardner.

I like the move by the Yanks. I'm sure it helped C.C. Just a little too. Pretty much like "hey C.C. Sign with us and we'll bring in Mikey for some company". I like the move by the Yanks as he can still hit 20 HR and save a few runs with the defense.

This deal made a lot more sense for the Brewers when Sabathia was still available. Then they could have added the 10M to the offer. And despite Cabrera being younger and cheaper, Cameron is the better player... I gotta think there's another piece of this deal.

Fine...Melky really regressed last year. Cameron is an upgrade and good buddies with CC...

mac 1103, you have the right idea.

Cameron and Cabrera are comparable defensively, but Cameron gives you 160 points of OPS that Melky won't.

Anyone who says this isn't a great trade for NY has bought WAY too much into the NY media's Melky hype. This is nothing more than a salary dump for the Brewers because they are headed for re-building.

I am not disillusioned about Melky. However, I am also well aware of what Cameron brings, which is not all that much. I dont expect Melky to turn into anything but what he already is. However, other teams have inquired about him and he could have been packaged with others for something else.
Like I said above, Id rather see Gardner out there than Cameron.
Wait till Cameron gets up regularly with runners on and strikes out constantly, he will make Arod in Oct look like Ortiz.

hey, dont get me wrong, im no melky supporter, and im a fan, so who cares about the money, im not paying them, but why mike cameron? think about it, is it to help CC become accostomed to NY being cameron has been here before?
I just think this is a bone head move.

"Gave up a 4th OFer for a stop gap who is great defensively..."

Is Cameron still great defensively? Serious question."

Well, probably not as good as he once was. But he's still well above average.

"I am not disillusioned about Melky. However, I am also well aware of what Cameron brings, which is not all that much. "

Above average CF who has OPS'd over .800 in 4/5 years does not bring much because...?

(yes I realize one year was .798, but still)

That is pretty valuable.

"Cameron is a guy who produces runs"

No Cameron is a guy that strikeouts in clutch moments. We saw it way too many times in Milwaukee last season. You can have him. We'll take the flier on Melky and hope he turns our to be half of what he was originally projected.

Besides, that's another $10 million off the books to hopefully sign an ace.

What do you want to package Melky for? You are definitely buying into the Cabrera-hype. He's a 4th outfielder. Do you honestly think he could fetch someone like Ankiel? Let's get realistic.

Mike Cameron looks unattractive because he hits for a low average and strikes out. Yet he's still a MAJOR upgrade over Cabrera/Gardner offensively. The guy's OPS+ is around or above 110 every year. To get that for a bench player is simply a great deal for the Yankees.

Nobody is saying Cameron is Mickey Mantle. But he's a MUCH MUCH MUCH better option than Cabrera/Gardner would have been, and all we had to do to get him was give up Melky.

Why Mike Cameron??


Answer: He cost us nothing but Melky Cabrera. That is a steal.


If you wanted Ankiel, you have to part with Kennedy as well. You want to do that? And then have Ankiel hit free agency in a year? No thanks. I'll take a rental of Mike Cameron, an 800 OPS player with plus defense in exchange for a bench warmer.

Cubbyfan..

The Yanks were supposed to be getting away from old guys past their primes. That is my issue along with how much he strikes out.
I am in no way comparing him to Melky. However I cant see why Gardner who is as good in the field cant be given the one year chance.
I just cant see how Cameron improves the lineup by that much.

"If you wanted Ankiel, you have to part with Kennedy as well. You want to do that? "

Yes, add Kennedy to the list of pitchers who dont have the balls to pitch in NY.
If I could get Ankiel for Kennedy and Melky (which I seriously doubt) I do that 100 out of 100 times.

"No Cameron is a guy that strikeouts in clutch moments."

Not a repeatable skill. I love how other fans always bring this up whenever someone leaves. Fact is, no one strikes out in the clutch more than anyone else actually, other than he just strikes out period a bit more than other players.

I see people's issue with him striking out too much, but he more than compensates for that with a great power bat.

Gardner is not anywhere close to him offensively IMO, he's more of a 4th OF type than a guy you want a championship team relying on.

Gardner can't hit.

I'm not sure why you can't see how adding an .800 OPS guy won't improve the lineup, when he's replacing Melky or Gardner, who can't hit a lick.

Kennedy doesn't have the balls to pitch in NY based on what?

"Yes, add Kennedy to the list of pitchers who dont have the balls to pitch in NY. "

Because he pitched for half a season while one of the youngest pitchers in the majors. Right. Clearly we have evaluated a top prospect enough there to decide he doesn't have the balls to pitch in NY.

"Id rather see Gardner out there than Cameron."

Brett Gardner is simply not a major league hitter. Expecting him to do anything other than get the bat knocked out of his hands isn't particularly realistic. Yes, he has an excellent batting eye, but there's no reason for major league pitchers not to challenge a guy who will struggle to hit .250 and has no power at all. Yes, he's extremely fast, but you can't steal first base. Yes, he's an excellent defender, but the Yankees of 2009 are not going to have the offense they had in 2007, and can't afford to carry an automatic out in their lineup (two when Molina plays).

Again, I'm not all that crazy about Cameron at this stage of his career, but what other CF could they get? (Realistically.)

I don't think that us Yankee Fans are over-estimating Melky, it's that you guys are apparently over-estimating Cameron. Cameron is by far nothing special, Melky may be better suited as a 4th outfielder, but I'd still rather have him than Cameron. For one thing, I just thought about how many said that Cano's early season struggles came because of the loss of his buddy Larry Bowa. 2009 projects a team without his best friend or his favorite coach.

But aside from that, I'd still rather have Melky because he has better defense, is younger, cheaper, and the better clubhouse personality. Anyone that has paid attention to the Yankees over the last few years has seen the veterans like A-Rod or Jeter or Rivera talk about enjoying having Melky around. Yeah, he isn't the Bernie Williams presence we used to have in Center Field, but Melky ain't such a bad player. If you take out a horrid June, Melky batted .263 with fantastic defense. He has been working on becoming more athletic and becoming more of a base running threat, so you have to imagine he would be increasing his steals and had did have nine steals last season. He had as nearly many hits in less at bats, struck out three times less, and Melky was a Red Sox killer last season when he batted .370.

Personally, I think all Melky needs to do is become more patient to become a pretty good player. His pitch selection is what killed him most of the time. If he worked on that and shed some weight (200 lbs at 5-11 ain't exactly lean you know) to become quicker on the base paths, I'd take him over Cameron any day of the week. And from what we hear, that's exactly what he has done this offseason.

brewers probably didnt want to pay him like someone said and that he is buddies with C.C. good deal for the yanks

Not just from what I saw, but from what I read, things he says. Kennedy will be a good pitcher, just not for the Yanks.
Kennedy was NEVER a top rated prospect. He was great in AAA and very good as a Sept call up, facing other Sept call ups.

Mattchu12,

You are lost in Cabrera-hype. I don't think Cameron is anything special. But Cabrera is a 4th outfielder. We lose nothing defensively and gain 100 points of OPS in the lineup. To say you'd rather than Melky Cabrera or Brett Gardner in the lineup over Mike Cameron is simply asinine.

If its a straight up Cameron for Melky trade, then its good for the Yankees. But to throw in Kennedy would definitely be a Dumb move. I would rather hold on to Kennedy for a while & see him excel in the Minors, then when July Comes & we need someone good we could then Trade him when his stocks are high.

yankeegirl49, you need better evaluation methods than that.

Kennedy might bust, but you're offering nothing of any substance to make that claim. And there's nothing to your claim of "he doesn't have the balls to pitch in NY." He's a kid. Nobody said he's as highly rated as Chamberlain or Hughes. But he can be a #3 starter if he hits his potential.

To dismiss him like that after seeing his minimal major league sampling is ridiculous.

"We'll take the flier on Melky and hope he turns our to be half of what he was originally projected."

The problem is that he HAS turned out to be half of what was originally projected. For all this talk about New York Melky-hype, he was never talked up as a great bat. He was supposed to mature into a slightly above-average hitter, which would be pretty valuable coming from a solid defensive CF with a howitzer for an arm.

Question...
When Melky came up (the 2nd time) all the Yank fans loved what they saw...hence the hype. Now we keep hearing about how AJax is our CF of the future. How do we know he is going to be any more of a sure thing than Melky turned out to be?
Ajax didnt even live up to expectations in AA or in AFL, but we hav annointed him our CF in 10, when he hasnt been in AAA yet.
I would STILL rather they go out and get someone for a few years or give Gardenr the one year shot. Maybe he cant steal first, but his 250 would still get him on and when he is on he makes things happen.

Cabrera at "half of what he was originally projected" is absolutely blown away by Cameron's bat.

yankeegirl,

Sure AJax could bust. Who cares? I don't see what AJax has to do with anything here. The Yankees just upgraded their 2009 roster tremendously by bringing in a guy CF who can hit and field.

Secondly, comparing Melky to AJax is ridiculous. Melky was never a great hitter. AJax could certainly be a bust, but drawing a comparison between him and Melky is seriously flawed.

Aj..

Again, Kennedy was NEVER even on our radar as a top prospect. He exceeded expectations in the minors and was brought up out of necessity (too early I might add, along with Hughes). He has some early success and then reverted to what he always was, an ok pitcher. Maybe he will end up being a good back end guy, but that can be said about Chase Wright too, and I dont want to see him on the mound either. I have been watching the Yanks and baseball for 35+ years and can tell you, there is a certain mindset ot be able to pitch in NY and for the Yanks, some have it and some don't. So far I havent seen anything from IPK that says he does. Could I be wrong? Sure and if I am and we keep him Ill be happy to have been wrong, but as of right now I cannot see him as part of the rotation.

Ajax has a lot to do with things because if we are holding the spot for him in 2010, it stops us from going after a CF that might be better than him..and better than Cameron.

ajgdrums7814,

I'm not lost in the hype there pal, what I'm not lost in is the hype for Austin Jackson. Every person that I've heard about him from, prior to 2008, said he was a project. That he'd be a 'quality outfielder'. Now, all of a sudden, for no reason at it all it seems, he is some kind of super-star.

In 2008 at AA, Jackson hit .285 with a .354 OBP, 9 HR, 69 RBI, and 19 SB in 131 games. Overall (meaning between 60 games at Low-A, 67 games at High-A, and 1 game at AAA) in 2007, he hit .304 with a .370 OBP, 13 HR, 59 RBI, and 33 SB in 128 games.

Now, while those aren't bad numbers, he ain't jumping out and screaming super-star to me. Not when a player like Evan Longoria hit like a fiend (.299 with a .402 OBP, 26 HR, 95 RBI, and 4 SB in 136 games between AA and AAA).

So, with all of that floating around my head, and knowing that someone as talented as A-Rod can go from a MVP season in 2005 and then to a very sub-par season (for him) in 2006 and then back up to an MVP season in 2007, well, I just think I'd rather hang onto Melky and see what he can do. Because while he is no A-Rod, he did bat .273 with a .327 OBP, 8 HR, 73 RBI, and 13 SB in 150 games in 2007 at the Major League Level. And with the kind of defense he plays, and the fact that in 2007, he struck out only 43% as much as Cameron did in 2007, well, I think I would be happier with Melky as my nine hitter than Cameron as my 6, 7, or 8 hitter.

yankeegirl,

Kennedy was selected 1st round (21st overall) in the 2006 amateur draft by the Yankees. He progressed so rapidly that he made his debut in September 2007.

Having a few rough starts in April of '08, less than 2 years since been drafted, doesn't mean he doesn't have the "balls to pitch in NY." It means he's 23 freaking years old and needs more time to develop.

Saying a guy who the Yankees selected 21st overall was never "highly rated" by them is simply ridiculous.

"If you take out a horrid June, Melky batted .263 with fantastic defense."

If you take out a great April, Mleky hit .235 with an OBP well under .300 and a slugging percentage of .299! We could play this game all day.

ya i think the only rreason they are trying to get Cameron is because they want CC to be happy and so they are trying to get one of his good friends

Cameron posted an .809 OPS in 2008 compared to Melky's .641. Cameron's UZR was 9.7 and Melky's was -0.5. Yeah, Cameron strikes out a lot. But he will play better defense, provide more power, and the Yankees are only committed to one year with him. Gardner would have pushed Melky for a job anyway.

I should have mentioned that another reason why I want to keep Melky is because I don't have too much faith in Austin Jackson, and would like to still have Melky around for when he flops.

So now we're comparing A-Rod's fluctuations with Melky Cabrera's? Come on dude. Cabrera AT HIS BEST was mediocre offensively. Cameron at his best is a plus bat in the lineup.

If A-Jax busts, the Yankees are going to have to find another CF in a year anyway, because Cabrera/Gardner is NOT the answer.

I am a big fan of this move - I only wish the White Sox had signed Cameron to play CF last year, despite the amphetamine ban - the defense, above average pop, and walks would have beat the hell out of trading the farm for Swisher. Thought it was a great deal for the Brewers, and to get him for Cabrera is quite a steal, I think.

Oh and AJ..
You said Melky was never a GREAT hitter..and I agree, BUT..
when was Jackson a great hitter? He hit .345 ONE time in single A ball. Other than that he is in the mid .200s, never hitting more than 10 home runs.
Most recently in Arizona he hit .245 with an OBP of .298.
Sorry, but I am not annointing him a great anything just yet.

We could Mac, I guess it just ends up coming down to which month you think was the fluke. His strong April, or his bad June. I'm betting that it was June, but I'll be fair and admit that it could have been April. I back my bet with having seen him in 2007, when I was more than pleased having him as my center fielder.

Blomberg must have given the Yankes more money.

"ya i think the only rreason they are trying to get Cameron is because they want CC to be happy and so they are trying to get one of his good friends"

THIS scares me more than anything. Not enough to give the guy 161 million, now we have to hire his friends. Whats next, his wife as DH?

LMAO

WHY are you comparing Cabrera with JACKSON? I'm talking about CAMERON. Cameron is a massive offensive upgrade over Cabrera. Thus, the 2009 Yankees are much improved with Cameron manning CF.

If Jackson is a bust, NY is going to have to find a CF anyway. Cabrera/Gardner sure as hell isn't the answer. And neither of those two have enough value to NET you anything that's going to be the answer. So what the hell are we debating?

I think most of us would agree that it would be Foolish to just giveaway Kennedy as an Add on in this trade for Cameron. Wouldn't it make better sense if we traded him when he has better value? We all agree that it takes a certain mind set to pitch in NY, so it doesn't mean he couldn't pitch somewhere else with a better result. He has good stuff, if he keeps pitching like that at AAA, his stock will rise & come July he could fetch someone better in a Trade if needed.

Hey now, I said that Melky was no A-Rod, I'm just saying that people have down years and bounce back. I believe Melky would be better, assuming he bounces back, because of everything he does other than the OPS and the HR, which is not how I'd prefer to win the game.

Relying on HRs are what made us miss the World Series the last 8 years, we need to get back into an RBI and flat out getting on base style. We haven't had the grinder style that we had in the late 90's, nobody on those teams hit more than 30 home runs (other than Tino in 1997, but the next in line was Bernie WIlliams with 21). They used RBI's and good old fashion getting on base and driving each other in to win ball games.

Kennedy isn't in this trade, so don't worry about it.

You don't prefer to win the game through OPS? Then how, praytell, do you expect to win?

Runs are created through OPS. You're making the grave mistake of assuming that HR and OPS are similar. They aren't. You don't have to be a homerun hitter to have a good OPS. And you can be a homerun hitter and not have a good OPS.

I'm debating Cameron vs Melky, but I'm also saying part of my argument is that I'd rather go into 2009 knowing that Cameron isn't my backup to Jackson falling flat on his face, I'd rather have Melky sitting there "warming the bench" as you'd say.

You're putting too much on the offensive side of this puzzle. The first 8 of a lineup of Damon-Jeter-Rodriguez-Matsui-Posada-Nady-Cano-Swisher will already have mid teens and better for home runs, all are near locks to have more than 70 RBI, so why not keep Cabrera and his very above average defense and his youth and potential over the expensive waste that is Mike Cameron?

I meant I didn't want to win through HR, not OPS.

I love how all the Yankee fans hate Cameron because he strikes out and would rather have Melky. They're willing to forget about the fact that Cameron has been above league average offensively for the past 10 seasons, posting a 110 OPS+ last season. That means he was 10% better than a league average player. Plus, his defense is still above average.
As for Ian Kennedy, when he was drafted the scouts said he would be a 5th starter/ AAAA pitcher. Then he put up amazing numbers in the minors making fans think he was something great. Since then, his major league numbers have pretty much fallen in line with what the scouts said he'd be. He could be decent on a team like the Pirates or Royals, but won't get a shot on the Yankees, and shouldn't. He's not talented enough.
So Yankee fans, keep complaining that you'd rather have a player that has NEVER been league average in his career (Melky) over a player that has been above league average for the past 10 seasons. You definitely show how much you know.

Mattch..
Im with you on this.


I dont get why people are so quick to dismiss Gardner but quick to defend Kennedy. Gardner has a small sample size as well, how do we know he wont grow into a good hitter.
After all he has a .291 batting average with a .389 OBP in his minor league career.

"I guess it just ends up coming down to which month you think was the fluke."

I think they were both flukes. Or neither. Take both out and you're right back where you started with both of them in.

The reason you were happy with Cabrera in 2007 had a lot more to do with the fact that the team scored 968 runs than with anything that Melky did. But the fact is that 2007 was a step back from 2006, and 2008 was a collapse from 2007.

And Austin Jackson's AA season was a fair bit better than what Melky did in the same league and park at a similar age.

Dodgers...I never said Id rather have Melky than Cameron. In fact I want neither. Like I said before, the idea was to get younger, especially in the OF. No reason why with a 1-8 like the Yanks have, they cannot carry a #9 that hits for low average but brings other things such as defense and speed.

Cameron brings defense and speed, too.


He also brings a bat.


I don't know what you aren't getting about this.

I'm with you too, I can't stand Kennedy, I always thought he was coasting on luck anyways for the short while he had success. I'm big on Gardner, having one of those two in CF with the other as your fourth outfielder is a good deal in my mind. I would much rather have one over Cameron, so both of them is the obvious choice to me. One of them will catch on with .270 + offense with great defense, and both are 25 or younger. Much rather have that than old ass Cameron.

And hey, Dodgers Bruin, the last ten years is very different from right now. If we cared what somebody did in the past, we'd be bringing John Smoltz over, or signing Barry Bonds, or giving Ken Griffey Jr our center field job.

After all he has a .291 batting average with a .389 OBP in his minor league career.

His skillset as a hitter tends not to translate well to the majors. He draws a lot of walks in the minors because pitchers down there have lesser stuff and lesser control. He can hit the average AAA fastball down the middle. He can't hit the average MLB fastball down the middle.

Having said that, I'd love to see the guy become a useful player for the Yankees. I really enjoy watching his kind of speed on the bases and in the field. But the reality is that this team cannot afford to give him 400+ PA in 2009 if they hope to score enough runs to contend.

He also brings a 35 year old body and a 10 million dollar contract (which I really dont care about, but others do).

We can agree to disagree.

I dont see how you can not like this trade. It is good for both teams. The yankees get a good defensive fielder with some pop for a one year stop gap. and the brewers free up some money. How can you not like a trade of a 4th outfielder(melky) for a starting cf?

I can't believe how many people are enamored with the likes of Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner. Wow. What is so attractive about speedy defenders who produce nothing offensively?

And in this scenario, you're not even LOSING any of the speedy defense. Wow.

So Cameron's $10 million dollar 1 year contract is what bothers you?

Please, don't make me laugh. This is the team that just signed a $161 million dollar pitcher and is about to drop $90 on another and possibly $30-50 on ANOTHER?

Ha. Nice try.

I can understand getting younger. But if I'm forced to choose between a player who is 15% below average offensively for his career (84 OPS+) and a player who is 5% better offensively for his career (106 OPS+, 114, 121, 103, 110 for the past 4 seasons), I'd rather have the guy who is 20% better offensively. The difference in their defense is negligible, if there is any at all.
Why would you want someone that is horrible offensively just because your other 8 players are good offensively? Injuries occur. Those 8 won't always be playing. You'll be forced to play some scrub (like Gardner played this year) next season and you'll be glad you have an above average offensive CF playing every day.

"No reason why with a 1-8 like the Yanks have, they cannot carry a #9 that hits for low average but brings other things such as defense and speed."

This is where you're wrong. This is not the 2007 offense. The current Yankee lineup projects to score something like 825 runs if everything goes very well. If Cano doesn't bounce back and Posada and Matsui don't recover quickly and fully, they're going to be seriously hurting at the plate.

People are complaining about getting younger but Cameron is only for one year, its not a multiyear deal. This gives the yankees a better lineup in 09 and takes pressure to rush Ajax into centerfield. Seriously how can you not like this deal???????

So it's not done, maybe Bill Hall to NY too? I'm curious as to what NY would give up.

Mac, I'm not saying Melky is better than Jackson, fact of the matter is that Melky gave us what we needed at the MLB level, and when they do that, stats from the minors fly out the window. Right now I'm just saying that Melky has given us some good stuff, and we shouldn't throw him aside for either an old, past his prime guy like Cameron or a guy that has never done anything at the Major League level and as we saw with our 'big three' last season, you can't count on minor league stats to show up on the big league level.

Ajgdrums7814, I will admit Cameron has above average defense. I don't consider it better than Melky's though, and as for his speed, I can concede that too. The numbers say he is better on the base paths. But Cameron is aging, and just like all of a sudden Ken Griffey Jr fell apart defensively, I am not prepared to say that I expect the Mike Cameron we've seen over the last five years. I'm too much of a realist for that, I'm saying that Cameron had a worse range factor than Melky, had less than half the assists, and a much worse Zone Rating. And while Melky is still young at 23 years old, Cameron is 35 years old and declining quickly. There is a reason why he ended up having to sign with the Brewers...

At this point in their careers, Melky and Cameron may be a wash defensively. Melky does have a very good arm but he does take a lot of poor routes on balls. And he looked completely lost at the plate for long stretches last year. The downside to the youth of Cano and Melky is that for long periods they would just become automatic outs at the bottom of the line up. And they'd make those outs in only two or three pitches.

Cameron is a veteran bat who will hit 8th or 9th in the lineup and be an automatic upgrade at the bat. Plus he'll bring some experience to the plate and see a lot more pitches than Cano or Melky ever do. He'd help bring back some of the depth of the lineup the Yankees used to have.

I'd take a smart veteran at a key defensive position to hit at the bottom of the order and hit .240 with 20 HRs and 75 RBIs and say 75 BBs and 150 ks any day. Especially in the AL East where you have to eat away at pitch counts to get into bullpens.

"Why would you want someone that is horrible offensively just because your other 8 players are good offensively?"

You wouldn't necessarily WANT a bad hitter in your lineup, but you might think that upgrading somewhere else was a higher priority if you thought you were going to score 900 runs anyway. The problem with yankeegirl's and mattchu's analysis is that they're over-rating the rest of the Yankee offense.

"I'm not saying Melky is better than Jackson"

I know. That was responding to yankeegirl. Sorry if you thought it was at you.

I see this a the Yanks helping the Brewers after getting CC. They help them get payroll flexibility so the Brewers can get a few starters.

About Melky, well you can't expect anything big from him b/c he was never projected to be. Both him and Gardner are just 4th OF. Gardenr a little bit better b/c he can run, but thta is it.

Mattchu,

You're not that bright. First off, Griffey had a 101 OPS+ last season, so he would be better than Melky.
With the numbers Barry Bonds put up in 2007 (170 OPS+), signing him wouldn't be a bad idea as your DH (he'd be better than Matsui). And bringing in Smoltz wouldn't be something the Yankees would be against. They did it with Leiber a few years ago.
If you want to use examples of players who used to be good in the past and are horrible now, try looking for players who are horrible now! Maybe mention Bret Boone or Jose Canseco. THAT would be a better argument about the past.
And my only point about mentioning the past 10 seasons was that Mike Cameron has been better offensively the past 10 seasons that Melky's BEST year. Cameron was extremely better than Melky last year and was even better than him the year before and the season before that. Melky has NEVER been better than Cameron, and it doesn't look like that'll change for the 2009 season either.

Hilarious that someone as awful (and don't fall for the overhype, Melky is an AWFUL offensive player...no average, not a little below, but AWFUL) is capable of landing someone like Cameron strictly on the ESPN media hype machine for the guy.

1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.