MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Gomes Signs Minor League Deal With Reds | Main | Pujols Not Concerned About Future Contract »

Freddy Garcia Close To Finding A Team

Scot Gregor of the Arlington Daily Herald expects free agent pitcher Freddy Garcia to make a decision sometime this week.

The White Sox, Mets and Rangers appear to be the only serious suitors.  Gregor provides some analysis on the White Sox' interest:

"There has been some speculation that the White Sox are no longer interested in Garcia after they signed another injury-prone veteran Bartolo Colon last week.  That’s not necessarily true.  Given Colon’s physical troubles over the past three seasons, there is still plenty of interest in Garcia on the South Side.  And even if Colon does manage to stay off the disabled list, they still need a No. 5 starter... If they get Garcia, that buys more time to develop promising left-hander Aaron Poreda."


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536e57395970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Freddy Garcia Close To Finding A Team:

Comments

I think he would end up with the mets. he is a good friend of santana. he once said he would love to pitch with johan on the same team.

if he went to the mets wouldnt that take sheets or perez out of the picture?

Mets definately could use him.

I think if Freddy wants to fit in well with the team, and also play for a contender i would say the White Sox would be his preference. I say the Mets will sign him if the White Sox don't give him an offer.

White Sox make sense,familia!

Aaron: Absolutely not. Garcia will be competition for the 5th spot. The Mets still need a #2 starter...

Thanks for clearing that up for me Hyro =)

Sheets and Garcia will be Mets, and Perez will be a Cardinal, Dodger, or Brewer...

Aaron: Absolutely not. Garcia will be competition for the 5th spot. The Mets still need a #2 starter...

Posted by: Hyro | January 19, 2009 at 05:35 PM

Well with Lowe out, Sheets is the only "#1-2" pitcher out there. Perez is a #3-4 type guy. The rotation would look decent-good if the Mets can sign either of those guys. Any other signing would be competition for the 5th spot.

I wonder how the Mets are doing on the Garland/Wolf/Pettitte front. They can just use that as leverage against Sheets and Perez. I also wonder if they can look into Mark Mulder as a buy low type.

As a Sox fan, I don't like this purely because my pessimistic side says we're not going to be able to hole off CLE and MIN.

Therefore, I believe we should be giving the 4 and 5 to some of our young pitching, so we can cull the weak.

I like sweaty Freddy as much as the next Sox fan, but we're not a Bartolo and Freddy away from locking this division up.

GO SOX!!!

*hold...oops.

ptp,

As a fellow Sox fan, I would like to see Freddie come back and see what he's got in ST. If he's not ready, he goes to extended ST and give Poreda,Broadway or Marquez a shot. None of them have the experience at MLB level to inspire confidence in a 162 game schedule.I'd even go so far as to say KW should make an offer to Pedro.

I guess a lot of it depends on how you're looking at the Sox. I know plenty of fans that think we're going to make a sustained run for the playoffs, and plenty of those (myself included) that just don't think we have the right pieces to make said sustained run.

Hell, I hope I'm dead wrong.

The Sox are competetive as they stand. Unfair to expect a full seson of production from unproven kid pitchers. So load up on cheap veteran pitchers,put them in the 4,5 slots or alternate them during injuries, play the hot hand until the all star break see who's available for the stretch and try to pick them up for the duration. If they are class a FA's we'll at least get the DP's

As we stand? As in at this very moment, with a pitching staff of...

Buehrle
Danks
Floyd
Colon
Richard/Marquez/Broadway/etc.

And half a season of Contreras (whatever the hell that brings)?

It doesn't scream competitive to me.

We'll get the DP alright...from Sizemore and Morneau (or insert random Twin and Indian).

Look at the rest of the Central
Indians
Lee
Carmona
Laffey
Pavano
?

Tigers
Verlander
Bonderman
Willis
Jackson
Robertson

Twinkies
Liriano
Slowey
Baker
Perkins
Blackburn

Sox
Buerhle
Danks
Floyd
Colon
Garcia
Martinez

I'd say more than competetive

I promise you the Indians rotation won't look like that, and I don't give a rat's ass about Detroit.

Also, we haven't signed Martinez or Garcia yet. Don't get ahead of yourself.

I'm glad you are so enthusiastic about the Sox, but I just don't see it my friend.

I am slightly skewed, watched the 05 Series like 3 times the other day, sorry all, and thanks for your patience
I do like our chances this year though

Garcia would make for nice competition with Redding and Niese. Still would need Perez though.

rfro,

Well who wouldn't be skewed then? '05 was a thing of beauty!

I don't understand where all the poo poo faces about the sox come from. We've lost 3 significant pieces from last year's 89 win team (88 without tie-breaker).

Crede, who's injuries almost void his value, figures to be replaced by Josh Fields, who with limited play last year didn't do too well. He figures however to do well this year and build on his success from 2007. He may not hit for a high average, but should match Crede's power fairly well, meaning that all we've lost in Crede is his slick glove, which last year was minimized as he was still recovering from his injuries.

Vazquez was a strong pitcher last year, but struggled to come through in the clutch. We have three established pitchers in our rotation in Danks, Buehrle, and Floyd who figure to be productive again next year. Add into that mix Colon and possibly Garcia, even if they combine for one productive season, there's your number 5. That leaves a heap of young pitchers competing for the last spot (a situation similar to the situation that yielded us Danks in 2007). Marquez, Broadway, Richard, Poreda, Jiminez all figure to compete for the one spot. Competition often yields the best results, and if one of them makes the rotation they will know that there are four other guys waiting at AAA to take their job if they falter. This rotation may not be as strong as it was with Vazquez, but it has the potential to be strong.

Cabrera, while productive at the plate, and solid in the field, Ramirez will be able to step into his defensive shoes and be adequate, and he certainly proved that he is productive with the bat. That leaves an easier defensive position to fill at second. Getz showed real potential to shine in his short stint in the majors, and again he will have competition with Lillibridge, Betemit, and Nix. Even if he hits for a consistent .240-.250 average, that will be better than Uribe's streakiness at the plate and adequate for the number 9 spot in the order.

All of these things said, I don't feel like the sox have weakened enough to throw in the towel before we've even hit spring training. There are question marks in the leadoff spot, and the number 9 spot as well as one maybe two spots in the rotation. I think Owens will come through leading off in center and while he may never be an all star, he will be serviceable.

Getz I think will be solid at worst, surprisingly strong at best. I could see him even challenging for the leadoff spot if he proves to be more patient than Owens. I think Fields will hit .260-.270, 25-30 HR, and 80ish RBI. I think one of our rotation prospects will come in and provide a serviceable number 4 starter (or 5 depending on how Colon/Garcia does).

Given, I'm not as excited at this point as I was this time last year, but I have faith in Ozzie and KW to put the right people in the spots where we need them.

I also keep in mind that the offseason isn't over, and spring training hasn't started. Anything can happen in spring training.

Later,
Aaron (Not ^ that Aaron)

I don't think Poreda should be in the rotation just yet.

Part of the prospect process is knowing when to keep them down for longer. Poreda needs longer in AAA to develop that additional plus pitch he will probably need to succeed long-term as a starter.

rfro and pariah,

I think Ken Williams is in a tough spot. Though he wants to win every year, he knows that next year's team will not look at all like last year's team so that would put this season into a kind of a baseball "limbo" category.

The Sox MUST get a proven leadoff hitter however, if they want to avoid an 85 loss season.

"I don't think Poreda should be in the rotation just yet.

Part of the prospect process is knowing when to keep them down for longer. Poreda needs longer in AAA to develop that additional plus pitch he will probably need to succeed long-term as a starter."

Once again, melonis rex is right on. Major league hitters will crush fastballs if they know they are coming.

Is a leadoff hitter more important that shoring up the pitching? Were I to think we were going to compete, I'd want to build some pitching depth before worrying about a leadoff hitter. We haven't had a decent leadoff hitter in many many years...our pitching has carried us.

There's no doubt KW is in a pickle. He doesn't want to put a bad product on the field, but he's working with some restraints and has to be creative.

We'll be ok...in '10, lol.

We have plenty of pitching depth. We're talking about 4 or more people playing for one spot in the rotation. If one guy goes down, we have several options to pull up from AAA. That is the definition of depth. We can't just go out and get 8 proven major league starters and keep three of them in the farm system.

I agree with you guys on Poreda, was just pointing out that he will be considered.

What we lack in the rotation is the same as we have always lacked. We don't have a true ace. If Colon stays healthy, that gives us 4 proven guys in the rotation (all of whom had a sub-4 ERA last year). The only question mark in those four is Floyd, and I think he will only get better. That's a pretty good spot to be in. Now we've got competition at the 5 spot, and some backup with whoever doesn't get the spot in case Colon goes down. Signing Garcia will only help our situation.

In order to get an ace, we would need to spend more money than we have this offseason. That's why we didn't get in on any of the high profile SP signings, and as of yet, haven't done much in the way of trading because we don't have depth in several positions to make it happen.

Later,

other Aaron

Aaron,

Why is Danks not that ace? I think Danks has the poise and stats to be the Sox' true "ace".

And I agree that the Sox have depth. Their main weakness is how uncertain that depth is. But, they will probably patch together a decent rotation. I'm guessing initially the rotation will be something like Danks-Buehlre-Floyd-Richard-Colon/Garcia, with Marquez, Nunez, and Broadway waiting around. I think they've built themselves a decent rotation. They just dont' have as many sure things as others do.

I think the Sox are doing a great job of retooling on the fly this year. A lot of us are forgetting that a few of the older guys contracts are up very soon and probably won't be resigned. As much as I like Thome, Dye and Paulie... I won't be sad to see them all gone in a couple years. We'll have the likes of Gordon, Quentin, and Flowers to replace these guys. And all of these guys can flat out rake.

K-Dub did a great job of getting potential prospects as well as ones that might be right around the corner of being ML ready in the near future. That's where we have to trust Coop to get the cheap vets to fill the back end of the rotation until the young guys can step in (which coop has shown he can do... Esteban Loaiza-the first time around). I also think it's never a bad thing to have too much pitching. I don't think there's such a thing as too much pitching.

I also think you're looking at the start of a thing of beauty. Can't ask for anything better then a division rivalry that is shaping up to be the Sox and Twins. Both have young guys that can really be the motor of their team.

Johnny Danks will step up to be the ace. I don't think there is a doubt in my mind. He's always had ace type stuff, just now finally starting to be that ace. Also, an ace is a guy that steps in every fifth day and gives your bullpen a day off, keeps you in the game, wins more often then he loses and can step up in a big game. I still think Buerhle has done that just about every year he's been here. He may not scare you in the batter's box, but he's going to come at you.

So I say, bring on '09... and whatever other SP they sign. I like my chances for this year and beyond.

Rex...
I totally agree. But not everyone is a sure thing when they first start. Hell... some sure things still aren't sure things-I really want to see Cliff Lee repeat last year before I call him a sure thing. And half of Minnesota's staff still may not be a sure thing. Hell of a lot experience last year, but not a sure thing. And the Tiger's sure thing staff didn't end up being a sure thing last year.

Aaron,

I agree with you that signing Garcia can only help. I also agree with you that Getz would be more than adequate playing 2B and batting 9th as well as Fields playing 3B and batting 8th (if his defense improves as much as he is implying it will)

Where we part ways is with Jerry Owens. I just don't see it. Hope I'm wrong but at this point it looks like the best option to bat leadoff is Wise... and that's not a great option.

I think Danks will be an ace, but needs a couple of years to be at the top. Buehrle would be an ace if he had an out pitch. Its the one thing that separates him from a guy like Sabathia, is a pitch that people are afraid to see. That cutter that Danks is developing is going to be that pitch. Last year was his first year throwing it, and it is going to be filthy.

I don't think Danks is there yet, but he will be.

Rotation as is will probably be Buehrle - Floyd - Danks - Colon - Richard. I think Buehrle is the opening day guy, and Floyd is number two because you dont' want two left handed starters following each other.

Later,

other Aaron

Signing Freddy makes no sense for the Mets. I like Freddy, I think he still has a little bit left in the tank, but didn't the Mets just sign a borderline 5 starter? So what if we sign Freddy and he ends up winning the 5 slot and Redding goes to Buffalo. Then we're paying our Triple AAA ace 2.5 million a year. Couple that with the probably 3 or 4 million that Freddy will make and there goes our bat. I would much rather use that money on Sheets and Perez, or Perez and Abreu, or Sheets and Abreu. If Omar signs Freddy and we lose out on Ollie and/or Sheets and/or a bat, I will be very angry.

And for the record I know that any combination of Sheets, Perez, and Abreu will cost much more than 7 million, but the Mets are being very frugal (or downright cheap depending on how you look at it, I lean towards cheap) this offseason and every dollar that is saved counts. Why sign garbage when you can get a bonafide ace, 3 starter, or quality corner outfielder.

I don't think you have any reason to worry about Garcia costing 3 or 4 mil. I don't see him getting any more than Colon, who is a pitcher with a similar injury record, and the benefit of a past Cy Young award. Colon got a one year 1 mil guaranteed contract, with incentives based on innings pitched of up to 2 more mil. That's a maximum of 3. Freddy won't get that much as Freddy's injuries have been worse and he doesn't have as strong a history as Colon does.

Later,
other Aaron

"Then we're paying our Triple AAA ace 2.5 million a year. Couple that with the probably 3 or 4 million that Freddy will make and there goes our bat"

No, Redding goes to the bullpen. You sign Garcia because he provides more upside than Redding. If/when Garcia gets hurt, Redding hops into the rotation. Although I agree that 2.5MM for Redding was a massive overpayment, that's the best purpose of the signing. And Garcia won't get 3-4MM. He won't get more than Colon or Pavano got, which was 1-2 MM with incentives.

And, Colon actually made good starts last year, unlike Garcia.

"....because you dont' want two left handed starters following each other."

Later,

other Aaron

Why? First of all your scenario would hace Richard followed by Buehrle ... 2 lefties. Besides, most managers don't want to sit their every day lineup two days in a row, so your second lefty would be facing more left handed hitters... a good thing.

"And, Colon actually made good starts last year, unlike Garcia." - monster rex

Actually, "big-game" Freddy saved his best for last and pitched really well against the White Sox in game 162.

No real baseball fan was surprised.

Sorry, should have been more clear. You don't want both of your first 2 starters to be lefties. Given, having three left handers in the rotation would be a little strange anyway, but especially with Buehrle tending to be a little under the radar as a staff ace, you won't see a whole lot of lineup adjustments for him. Point being, if your two best pitchers are lefties, you want to put a righty between them. In this case, it makes more sens to put Richard and Buehrle together. Realistically its a tiny little detail that doesn't always make a ton of difference, but I would say separating your two best lefties would trump having your two best pitchers go back to back. Especially when you have a strong third pitcher who is right handed. If Buehrle and Danks were still here, but there was no Floyd, I could see putting them together.

Later,
other Aaron

"Why? First of all your scenario would hace Richard followed by Buehrle ... 2 lefties. Besides, most managers don't want to sit their every day lineup two days in a row, so your second lefty would be facing more left handed hitters... a good thing."--------Svengoolie


I agree that putting lefties back to back can sometomes work in your rotation. However if you put two lefties who have similiar soft tossing pitching styles together you will get absolutely crushed. A lineup will get smoked the first time through the order, second time through they start to catch up to the pitcher. They seen his stuff. So giving them 6 looks at a similiar pitcher on back to back games will result in quality at-bats. Put Danks or Buerle back to back with Richard and that's what you'll get. I know Danks and Richard have better fastballs than Buerle and that makes them a slightly different style pitcher. But not enough. Thier fastballs are not overpowering by any means.

The Sox will have to play with the rotation on a weekly basis. For example, if your 2 lefties are pitching games 2-3 of a series and you had an off day in between you bump up your right-hander to pitch game 3 (*he still needs to get his normal rest with the off day). Here is where this gets tricky. If they do go with Colon or Garcia they don't have enough in the tank to get bumped. They will need the extra day. Floyd has the perfect make up to do this but anyone who know the Whitesox organization knows that they can get the best out of you in any given season but it usually costs you a long career in baseball. Case in point, Mike Sirotka has his best years with the Sox and we trade him. Why? Blows out his arm the next year. In fact he tried to block the trade because he told Toronto his arm was damaged and they tried to get compensation for the deal. Bobby Thigpen. Sets the save record-never the same again. Jack McDowell, Alex Fernandez, Freddy Garcia, Wilson Alveraz, Tanyon Sturtze, "El Duque", Estaban Loiaza and we were just 2 years wrong on Bartolo Colon. Every single one had arm problems after pitching for the Sox. Herm Schnieder has a magic scope on the the pitchers arms. That's why as a pitcher I'd be leary to come to Chicago. Even better, why would you trade for a pitcher from the Sox.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not complaining one bit. This is why I trust everything that Kenny Williams does. Not only does he see talent that others can't but, he and his staff can see what's left in an arm. We have not had to endure the losses of top line starters like other teams have had too(Contreas. Yes but, you can't see an Achelies injury. And NO, I'm not calling Contreas top line guy).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.