![]() |
|
|
| |
« Phillies Interested In Will Ohman | Main | Looper A Fit For Baltimore? »
An AP report posted at ESPN.com says the White Sox are not expecting to sign any more free agents.
This means the White Sox will go with one of either Chris Getz, Brent Lillibridge or Jayson Nix at second base in 2009, as 2008 second baseman Alexei Ramirez moves to shortstop.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Has any team in the Central gotten better this offseason?
Posted by: kgbaseball | January 31, 2009 at 03:20 PM
This just in...the sun will be setting in the west this evening
Posted by: rfro | January 31, 2009 at 03:25 PM
more news later, back to you Tim
Posted by: rfro | January 31, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Last year the AL Central was thought to be one of the best...The Indians will win the divison by 10-15 games, and Dye and Konerko will be traded in July.
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 03:36 PM
"Has any team in the Central gotten better this offseason?"
Indians add Wood and DeRosa, get V-Mart and Hafner back.
Tigers- Get a solid defensive SS, some BP help, and Liard to catch. I think overall theyre better than last year.
Royals should improve if only because the young players should continue to progress, i doubt Jacobs and Farnsworth will do too much good.
And the Twins havent made any bad moves, and they could still sign Wiggy.
Posted by: chicubs25 | January 31, 2009 at 03:37 PM
No way! You cannot be serious! Ha Even if we were going to sign more free agents it was not going to be a 2B.
Posted by: Tough | January 31, 2009 at 03:37 PM
Has anyone heard anything about the two Cubans that just defected?
Posted by: rfro | January 31, 2009 at 03:39 PM
Yeah Sox definitely have had the worse off-season in the central, if not of all baseball. It's funny, but probably right that the Twins did better than the Sox by doing zero. Ozzie can't be happy...
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 03:41 PM
B.S.! The Cubs have had the worst off season! they gave away prospects once thought to be their cream of the crop! and got back nothing! and then signed a head case over market value...so explain how the Sox did so much worse by getting rid of non performing players owed alot of money and getting younger players that have a high upside
Posted by: rfro | January 31, 2009 at 03:50 PM
Sox had the worst offseason!? HA That is funny. Adding Tyler Flowers, Dayan Viciedo, and Jeff Marquz to go along with the already young crop of players the Sox have are dumb moves. Swisher was useless last year and Javy craps himself anytime it matters, Orlando Cabrera was a head case that more about his personal stats than the team winning. Get real. Just because they didn't add high end free agents and removed some veterans from their lineup doesn't mean they had a bad offseason... yet alone the worst in all of baseball!
Posted by: Tough | January 31, 2009 at 04:09 PM
it is suppose to say How's adding... and end with a ?
Posted by: Tough | January 31, 2009 at 04:11 PM
2 Cubans just defecated.
Hey - speaking of defecation, who's playing third base for these guys in 2009?
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | January 31, 2009 at 04:13 PM
"Hey - speaking of defecation, who's playing third base for these guys in 2009? "
Have you heard of Josh Fields???
23 home runs in 100 games in '07. Couple that with a high strikeout rate and poor defense and that the solution for '09. But to be fair he's said to be improving his D this year and either way will be a big offensive improvement over Uribe.
Posted by: quentin2 | January 31, 2009 at 04:33 PM
Also its dumb to say they had a bad offseason. They're trying to improve their prospects and didn't not want to spend money besides Viciedo. So what do you expect??? Besides the #4,5 spot in the rotation and the lead off position they have enough quality player to fill in most of their gaps, and to say any other team in the central had a MUCH better offseason then the sox is ridiculous.
Posted by: quentin2 | January 31, 2009 at 04:37 PM
"But to be fair he's said to be improving his D this year and either way will be a big offensive improvement over Uribe."
Between his lack of foot speed, lack of arm strength and lack of baseball instincts he has A LOT to improve upon.
Posted by: MPM | January 31, 2009 at 04:53 PM
Meh. Josh Field regressed horribly last year, striking out 98 times in 276 AB in AAA. And only 10 homers across the board at all levels last year. And terrible defense. Hurt? Yah. Sucky? Yah.
Over the course of a 500 AB season he would project to hit around .225 with about 10-15 homers, about 50 RBI, and he'd strike out over 200 times with about 26 errors at third. You sure you don't want Uribe back?
Nice.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | January 31, 2009 at 04:55 PM
The Sox don't have a back end of the rotation. They lost Cabrera, Swisher, Crede, Uribe, Hall...who's the back-up catcher, who plays first when Konerko has his yearly slump and gets hurt? Who's playing 3rd and 2nd? And who's leading off or playing center? Lots of questions..how did they improve its puzzling?
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 05:18 PM
Trade time?
There really haven't been enough big trades this offseason.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 06:03 PM
there biggest pick up was bartolo colon.. that should sum up there off season
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | January 31, 2009 at 06:04 PM
No - it's definitely hlaf bas.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | January 31, 2009 at 06:21 PM
I mean...look. I'm a big sox fan. I even bought the ozzie pack (season tix) last year. I got to say I agree that this has been a brutal off-season. To say we're better off without Javy and OCab is not being practical. Although they were a pain we won the division partly because of their consistency. We have not replaced them. The bottom line is that our owner is cheap, lost alot in the stock market and won't commit a dime more to the team. With this team I won't invest in season tix, and won't be going to more than a few games. I'm afraid there's alot more fans that feel the same way. By the way we're not really going "young" as it has been said..the core of the team is in the decline of their careers (Dye, Thome, Konerko, Pierzynski, and we need to move at least 2 from the core to move on...I'm anticipating a long season...but you never know spring hopes eternal.
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 06:22 PM
bob loblaw,
is colon/richard for 405 gonna cut it? floyd is likely to regress. also as a side note, the best part of next year for a cub fan is the al central could easily end up
Indians
Twins
Tigers
Whitesox
Royals
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | January 31, 2009 at 06:24 PM
At least we did not dish out a 30 million dollar contract to a player with an injury history who only played 20 games in the outfield last year.
The White Sox added ALOT of good quality depth to their minor leagues, players with high ceilings but are expected to contribute very soon.
Another quick comment, who won the division last year? Exactly, and who epected them to do that?
Posted by: RenegadeRalphE | January 31, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Pistolpete,
Our biggest addition was Colon according to who???? We added Marquez, Flowers, NIx, Lillibridge, Viciedo, along wit a few more. Let alone the young guys nearing the bigs like Poreda, Beckham, Getz and Richard. So change that to the Biggest name pick up was Colon. But if you have seen what kenny williams does, you should realize they dont need to be big names to have a big impact.
J the dizzola,
He had a bum knee all season, if i were you, i would look at his last healthy season, where he would of been about .250 40 100 if he played all year.
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Bob Lowlaw,
That lineup and rotation is terrible, and completely unbalanced. No way alexi can hit at the top of the order. He needs to hit near 6 or 7. Colon just had his elbow scoped and won't be ready for opening day...try again please.
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 06:30 PM
Bob Loblaw....Really????
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:32 PM
People get so sensitive. Name me 1 move the Sox made to improve the 09 team? They picked up some good young prospects but take Vasquez and his 12 wins and 200 innings as well as the 60 hrs provided by Swisher, Cabrera, Uribe, Griffey and Crede (your starting CF, SS, 3B) and tell me how they're BETTER in 09. Just seems that KW and Ozzie are conceeding this year and dedicated to being better in 2010 and beyond.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 31, 2009 at 06:32 PM
ChiSox723,
Those additions hardly fill the sox holes. None appear to be major league ready for opening day. What the Sox need the most is a staring pitcher (Ben Sheets or Jon Garland) would have been nice relatively affordable signings and a lead-off hitter/center field. The Sox should trade some of those prospects for a prove commodity, such as Brian Roberts.
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 06:34 PM
u guys are attacking him like he is an idiot, when u guys are the idiots Alexei can easily hit at the two spot, floyd is 25 and was a top prospect so no pistol pete. Heilman, Lilly and Marshall is identical to our situation. Plus pistol pete your, division outlook is completely biased by you.
Sox
Twins
Indians or Tigers
Indians or Tigers
Royals
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:37 PM
Office Karkovice,
Agreed. Alexi swings for the fences too much to be at the top. Didn't Ozzie bat AJ 2nd a good portion of the season?
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 06:39 PM
officer ron, its a lil early to say those guys wont fix the wholes. Sheets is always hurt and garland had a 4.91 mark last year...
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:39 PM
he swings for the fences yet he didnt strike out a lot and was a 300 hitter until the last week
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:40 PM
ChiSox723,
Why do you keep bringing up the Cubs? As Sox fans, let stay focused. I'm just a little concerned that Alexi fancies himself as a power hitter/RBI man, he certainly not the worst candidate for the Sox, but I liked him down in the order, clutch hitting RBIs.
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 06:43 PM
officer ron, a lil early to say those aquisitions wont make an impact and u can take garlands 4.91 era
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:43 PM
there are random cubs fans on here...did not mean to write that twice hahaha
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:44 PM
OK so you would take Colon over Garland?
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 06:44 PM
he makes adjustments as good as anyone in the majors
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:44 PM
OfficerRonKarkovice...I love the nickname!
Posted by: tytomkiel | January 31, 2009 at 06:45 PM
if colon is healthy yes, i would take marquez over garland.. if his sinker is as good as kw says it is
Posted by: ChiSox723 | January 31, 2009 at 06:45 PM
Is this Viscaino guy starting at 3rd? What happended to Fields?
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 06:48 PM
lilly is a consistent 4 era with many wins and is proven the last three years.. colon not so much... marshall is similar to ur 5
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | January 31, 2009 at 06:50 PM
Yeah you would have to be at least 30 years old to remember officer ron's crater face. The office ron/fisk platoon was great from 89-92
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 06:50 PM
As a sox fan, it's silly to compare our rotation to the Cubs. We needed to have added one quality veteran to eat innings. This is still my biggest concern. Who makes up Javys innings? Big question. You can't say that Marquez and Richard combined will have more innings than Javy. Maybe Kenny has a trade up his sleeve.
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 06:54 PM
Colon and Marquez over Garland?
Wow......
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 06:58 PM
Yanks fan,
The sox have the cheapest GM and they cant throw money aroungd an expect to win like your team.The arent building for 09 they are building for the future.And they will be a great team in 2 years .They can still compete in this division.
_______________________
I wasn't knocking what they were doing, just stating a fact. And speaking of facts, the last time I checked the Sox were a major market team that just took about $35 mil off the books (Crede, Swish, Crede, Vasquez, etc). They could afford to add 1 or 2 players can come in under the 08 payroll if they choose to. That being said it should be interesting to see what happens when they rid themselves of Thome, Dye, Pierzynski and Konerko in the near future and how Ozzie and KW choose to reshape/retool the team.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 31, 2009 at 07:07 PM
Yanks Fan,
What you state is true, and unfortunate. Although the cheap one is the owner, not the GM. This could be Ozzie's last year. I can't see him wanting to start a new era. He loves his veterans, and hates rookie mistakes. But it seems that at least Dye and Konerko could be gone by midseason. This is Thome's last year.
Posted by: OfficerRonKarkovice | January 31, 2009 at 07:12 PM
"Colon and Marquez over Garland?"
Yes.
Garland was massive, massive overpayment. Garland pitched to the level of an AAAA pitcher; he was just on a winning team, had a great defense behind him, and got a bit lucky.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 07:15 PM
I really, really think KW bends over backwards for Ozzie way too much though. That was what screwed over the Sox' offseason. Vazquez and Swisher should NOT have been traded. They were both in Ozzie Guillen's doghouse, which is quintessentially why they were traded for less than ideal deals (if Flowers moves to 1B, his value drops significantly).
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 07:18 PM
Yes.
Garland was massive, massive overpayment. Garland pitched to the level of an AAAA pitcher; he was just on a winning team, had a great defense behind him, and got a bit lucky.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 07:15 PM
______________________________
Almighty one...please go on with your point and explain why you would sign Colon over Garland, and please leave money out of it...We don't want your opinion, please state facts.
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 07:19 PM
I'd rather have Marquez/Colon at a small cost than Garland at $8.75M for a year.
His peripherals are crap, and he's never posted an FIP under 4.20. He may be able to produce in Arizona, but bringing him back to a hitters park and the AL is not a good idea as far as I can tell.
My bigger concern is simply that this team is going to have major issues contending with a rotation of Buehrle, Danks, Floyd, Colon and Richard, as well as question marks at three of the key skill positions on the field (center, second, third).
Throwing away Swisher was never a good idea. I'm surprised they couldn't get a better starting pitcher prospect than Jeff Marquez.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 31, 2009 at 07:20 PM
Vasquez is far from a sh*tty pitcher, and this is coming from a Yanks fan that watched him struggle in NY. He definatly comes up short in the big games, but you can't discredit the positves he bring to a team over the course of 200 innings. But Ozzie and Vas are definetly a combustible pair had he stayed.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 31, 2009 at 07:29 PM
He may have been inconsistent, but he was a legit workhorse and posted great peripherals and when his luck was on he was a solid #2.
Sometimes his command drifts and he's basically trademarked the "One Bad Inning," but he's still a productive pitcher with good swing-and-miss stuff that is a sure thing to pitch 200 innings.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 31, 2009 at 07:39 PM
He was a terrible "big game" pitcher, but his overall stats were very, very good. A pitcher with a career FIP under 4 is pretty damn good. Even if Vaz was going to be traded, the Sox could've gotten more for Vazquez.
Lets play a game, shall we. Which pitcher should net more in a trade.
Pitcher A: A middling 2/high 3 starter who is a pretty damn sure bet to make 30+ starts almost every year, under contract for the next 2 years.
Pitcher B: A bonafide ace who missed the entire previous season, has a massive injury history(had not pitched a full 30+ starts or 200+ IP since 2004), and had just strung together a series of consecutive starts. Controlled for 1.5 years at the time of trade.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 07:43 PM
I wish you guys luck and am not trying to come off as a jerk but I don't see how the subtraction of 4 or 5 maor contributors with out the replacement of any guys ready for the ml in 09 can instill any confidence in being a contender in 09. Bus then again, no one thought the Twins would be in so you never know. Let the games being!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 31, 2009 at 07:52 PM
"Almighty one...please go on with your point and explain why you would sign Colon over Garland, and please leave money out of it...We don't want your opinion, please state facts.
"
Why leave money out of it? It's part of evaluating signings.
Jon Garland was a below average pitcher in many metrics, FIP, K/BB (actually, he had an atrocious K/BB), tRA, K/9, etc. Garland got 8.75MM guaranteed money.
Bartolo Colon pitched fairly well for the Sox in the starts in which he was healthy. If he can put together a good string of starts with the Sox, he reenters the FA market in 2010 and gets a massive contract. He has a ton to prove in ChiTown. If his FIP stays around 4.5, which is average, and he makes a decent sum of starts, he should be an absolute steal at the 1MM plus performance incentives he's getting. If Colon doesn't pitch much, the Sox release him and they're only out 1MM.
The White sox have Marquez, Broadway, and later on in the season Poreda waiting in the wings to get a chance to start (assuming that Richard is already in the rotation). Thus, they have plenty of #5 starters who could step in if Colon gets hurt. Guys who could very easily pitch to the pedestrian numbers of Garland if given the opportunity.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 07:55 PM
Just because you have money doesn't mean you spend it on mediocrity, like Garland.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 07:56 PM
If it was a farm system replenishment, then they failed.
They added a single good prospect and some throw-ins for a 2/3 under contract for two years and a good OF under contract for three years. Swisher and Javy should have landed more.
Look at what those two guys did in the years before 2008, and you'll see they either misvalued or sold low on both of those guys.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 31, 2009 at 08:08 PM
Lilly had a combined 32 wins, 68 games started, 411.7 innings pitched, eras of 3.83 and 4.09
Buehrle: 25 wins, 64 games started, 419.7 innings pitched and eras of 3.63 and 3.79
Lilly is our numer 3 Buehrle is your number 1. How is our rotation like yours? You lineup and lack of productive big name activity is the same, but not the rotation. You guys acually have a bright future based on the trades and signings that you have made through international signings. The only problem you might have is who's going to play ss when beckham is ready., Ramirez or Beckham. You have a nice young core in Danks, Floyd, Ramirez, Preda, Beckham, Owens, Flowers, and Jenks. Our best prospect is in single A and 19 years old.
Posted by: bobby p | January 31, 2009 at 08:16 PM
OBPyeahyouknowme- Thats right the cubs have traded or given away first round draft picks for trades or blocked them by signing type A free agents or even a medicore Center fielder in Kosuke Fukudome. Our guys never got a chance becasue we are in win now mode. I am not saying that Pie, Cedeno, Olsen, or Ceda would have worked out into everyday players, let alone alstars that some were projected to be (pie), but at least the Sox are giving the gys a chance to improve and compete to see what they can do and mature by being in the race at the end of the year ( or at least they should be)
Posted by: bobby p | January 31, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Ok, I guess we will have to disagree about Colon v. Garland, however totally agree about Vazquez. You simply cannnot replace those innings. The Sox are a mid-major.
Posted by: Art | January 31, 2009 at 08:31 PM
If I were a White Sox fan, I would not be particularly happy about their cost-cutting moves this offseason. KW is a terrific GM, but he's clearly been hampered by payroll constraints (no big surprise there).
One thing that I don't think has been mentioned yet: the defense looks BRUTALLY bad.
Posted by: Chris W. | January 31, 2009 at 08:44 PM
bobby p - Beckham looks like the SS of the future. Alexi Ramirez belongs in the OF.
Posted by: Chris W. | January 31, 2009 at 08:46 PM
Don't know what everyone else thinks about this, but wouldn't it have made sense to maybe trade marquis plus a someone like cedeno, plus maybe pie and another pitcher. Teo out of option players, but they are at holes and marquis only had one year left. I know the Cubs probably would not do it due to Vasquez's contract plus giving up pie cedeno and another guy instead of rrecieveing crap for them, but this gives you another innings eater for one year while poreda/richar develop a little more and solves the cubs problems of 5th starter becasue Vasquez could be our 3-4 while harden/marshall combo move to the 5th spot
Posted by: bobby p | January 31, 2009 at 08:48 PM
Chris W- is Alexi a possiblity for 3rd or a move back to second. I don't know much about the system other than the top prospects becasue I am a cubs fan, but I am still intersested because I am a basball fan
Posted by: bobby p | January 31, 2009 at 08:52 PM
Chris W good call on the defense - lf/rf/3b are problems and ss might be as well. i would be tempted to just put anderson in cf and put up with his offense but i don't know if you can afford to put him 9th and then have getz and ramirez 1-2
Posted by: cubz23 | January 31, 2009 at 09:09 PM
i love when sox fans say hendry is stupid for signing fukudome when your gm bid more for him...
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | January 31, 2009 at 09:26 PM
I seriously doubt Ramirez goes to the outfield on a regular basis. He can play center, but everything I've read says that he plays strong to excellent defense at SS, and we saw that he was more than capable at 2B, however what I've read also says that in center his defense suffers. Owens and Anderson are both better options in center.
Once Beckham comes up, I think he and Ramirez are your DP combo, just a question of which one goes where. I think Ramirez probably stays at short simply by virtue of seniority.
Also, keep in mind that Jordon Danks is coming up and looks to have some serious upside.
In regard to Getz leading off. I think its a possibility, but probably not to start the season. If by June he's proven to be the high average, patient hitter that he has a rep for, then he could be a perfect fit at that spot, thus making Owens expendable and giving us the opportunity to afford Anderson's bat as a trade off for his glove.
Later,
Aaron
Posted by: Aaron | January 31, 2009 at 09:30 PM
if it was not a salary dump then why did you cut 15 mil off of your salary and not bid on a free agent?? you could have traded dye and signed dunn/abreu/bradley(before the cubs) you could still sign sheets, or could have offered someone like Lowe a contract.. or done something productive for 10 mil and taken the arb pick... REMEMBER THIS- if you sign someone to a 1-year contract why not??? you may get an arb pick, and all it is going to do is help your team, if there is actually payroll to spend it on
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | January 31, 2009 at 09:32 PM
'' Did the AL Central get any better?''
Additions
Tigers- Brendan Lyon
Indians- Mark DeRosa, Kerry Wood, Carl Pavano
Twins- No body
Royals- Mike Jacobs, Kyle Farnsworth
White Sox- Bartolo Colon,
Laynce Nix, Brent Lillibridge
No not really. The tribe would have to be the winners of the offseason of the AL central.
Posted by: BLEEDINGCUBBIEBLUE | January 31, 2009 at 09:35 PM
"Chris W- is Alexi a possiblity for 3rd or a move back to second. I don't know much about the system other than the top prospects becasue I am a cubs fan, but I am still intersested because I am a basball fan"
He probably could play a bunch of other positions, but when you have someone who can play SS well, you put him at SS. SS is the most premium defensive position and is in the highest demand long term.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 10:21 PM
"Please let me correctly sum up the offseason for the sox; it was a SALARY/AGE Dump and Farm System replenishment. That's all, this was not in anyway an attempt to improve the major league club so don't expect such. That's it. "
They failed in two of the three objectives you highlighted.
The Sox didn't truly dump older players, like you know, Thome, Dye, and Konerko. Swisher is 27 and Vaz 32.
I like Lillibridge, but his stock has fallen greatly. Flowers is the only other blue chip prospect acquired in the two deals, which isn't really a farm system replenishment. And, Flowers was bought when his value was at an all time high AND he has MAJOR positional questions.
Vazquez and Swisher also were being paid at or below market value. So, they "dumped" two very manageable salaries and didn't get much in return.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Bob-
Marquez was never a top 100, hell, never even a top 150 prospect. He didn't even make most Yankees' top 20 prospect lists for 2008. Sickels graded Kanekoa Texera, the prospect the Sox sent TO THE YANKEES in the Swisher trade higher than he did Marquez.
I understand picking up young top pitching prospects who had fallen out of favor, but Marquez was never a top prospect to begin with.
And although Vazquez is the definition of anticlutch, he was DEFINITELY good.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 31, 2009 at 11:07 PM
"IN 3 years if the stars allign they way they are hoping they will."
Posted by: OBPyeahyouknowme
Wiser words were never spoken. LOL at drunk Twins fans.
Posted by: Svengoolie | January 31, 2009 at 11:10 PM
The Sox added Javier Vazquez to be the #5 starter in 2006. He is the perfect #5 starter because he would be coming out of the bullpen in the playoffs.
It's not his fault that KW and Ozzie overrated him and made him a #2.
Like most players, he is what he is.
Posted by: Svengoolie | January 31, 2009 at 11:14 PM
Sox are in good shape this year,they got rid of some dead wood and brought in some new blood...yes 3B,CF,and2B are questions...along with the 4 and 5 in the rotation...Fields can hit and is working on his defense,2B is probably the most easily filled position...give me some decent defense and know how to put a bunt down and hit the other way advance a runner and we're good...what's the sabremetric for that? Owens' time is now,Sox can win central if they play unselfish ball like 05.Gotta play the game right
Posted by: rfro | February 01, 2009 at 02:00 AM
"One thing that I don't think has been mentioned yet: the defense looks BRUTALLY bad." Last years was great by no means, but is this yearly defense radically different??? Move alexei to his natural position of SS, and replacing 2b with either getz or lillibridge, which is said to have great range. As for CF if anderson gets the job which I doubt he plays a very solid CF. Maybe 3rd has gotten worse but the rest will be similar.
However if I had an offseason wish it would definatley be Sheets. A rotation of
buehrle-sheets-danks-floyd-colon/marquez looks ALOT better than a rotation of
buehrle-danks-floyd-colon-marquez/poreda.
Posted by: quentin2 | February 01, 2009 at 02:09 AM
White Sox
Royals
Indians
Tigers
Twins
Posted by: WhiteSox111 | February 01, 2009 at 08:14 AM
Brian Anderson is one of the best defensive outfielders in the major leagues
Posted by: ChiSox723 | February 01, 2009 at 11:22 AM
While reading these post 1 thing concerns me. You people that think Alexei Swings for the fences are nuts! Have you ever watched him play baseball. The kid takes more pitches to the opposite field for base hits than anyone on our team. Sure he lets lose sometimes and tries to mash a pitch out of the park but to say that he swings for the fences all the time is outlandish.
Posted by: Tough | February 01, 2009 at 03:53 PM
Brian Anderson MVP 09'
Posted by: chicagocardsfan | February 01, 2009 at 04:18 PM
if i said at the beginning of the off season the sox would lose swish, javy, not sign oc or crede, and only gain bartolo colon what would u say??? be honest?
i just cant see someone saying nice moves!
Posted by: Pistolpete463 | February 02, 2009 at 07:26 PM