« Odds and Ends: Sisco, Murton, Thigpen |
Main
| Reds Sign Jacque Jones, Daryle Ward »
By Tim Dierkes [February 5, 2009 at 2:11pm CST]
The latest from SI.com's Jon Heyman...
- The Yankees offered a minor league deal to Andruw Jones, which he turned down. Other teams "thought to have interest": the Rangers, Phillies, Braves, and Mets.
- Heyman thinks Pedro Martinez makes a lot of sense for the Dodgers. However, Dylan Hernandez of the L.A. Times learned from Ned Colletti on January 6th that the Dodgers weren't among the teams pursuing Pedro.
- Jason Varitek's camp (ie, Scott Boras) apparently has no regrets about rejecting arbitration since it wouldn't have been a guaranteed contract.
- Chad Cordero's next showcase is scheduled for February 19th.
- Heyman has the Twins as favorites over the Giants to sign Joe Crede. More on Crede here.
- Heyman says the Yankees feel they're more likely to find a deal for Nick Swisher than Xavier Nady.
- Add Mark Grudzielanek to the list of right-handed hitters the Phillies are considering (Nomar Garciaparra, Rich Aurilia, and Moises Alou being the others).
Hmm, I had a feeling the Yankees would offer Jones a deal...minor league and I guess he wasn't impressed. :P
Posted by: JFossick | February 05, 2009 at 02:13 PM
Ahaha Andruw Turned down the yankees. I guess he'd rather go to a less tough crowd.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | February 05, 2009 at 02:13 PM
"The Yankees offered a minor league deal to Andruw Jones, which he turned down."
You are a idiot! They actually would of let him play over the kids if had any sign of life.
He should pay the Yankees.
"Heyman thinks Pedro Martinez makes a lot of sense for the Dodgers."
For 5-6 Million? Yeah.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | February 05, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Discussion: What would the Yankees want for Swisher from the Braves? Yankees fans and Braves fans please contribute.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Love Crede to the Twins. They're such a solid franchise.
Posted by: breakz | February 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM
"Ahaha Andruw Turned down the yankees. I guess he'd rather go to a less tough crowd."
I was actually thinking it's because he wants a major league deal... not a minor league one.
Posted by: Agent | February 05, 2009 at 02:26 PM
"Jason Varitek's camp (ie, Scott Boras) apparently has no regrets about rejecting arbitration since it would've have been a guaranteed contract."
Hahahaha. Right.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | February 05, 2009 at 02:27 PM
Discussion: What would the Yankees want for Swisher from the Braves? Yankees fans and Braves fans please contribute.
___________________________
Too much, I suspect. My guess is they would want 2 prospects when the Braves think Martin Prado should be enough. It is a tough spot, since Swisher is owed $22M over the next three years. Two months ago that would seem like a bargain, but suddenly it seems like a lot when you think you could probably get Abreu or Dunn for that price.
Posted by: Brad426 | February 05, 2009 at 02:28 PM
"Ahaha Andruw Turned down the yankees. I guess he'd rather go to a less tough crowd."
I was actually thinking it was because he was looking for a major league deal... and not a minor league one.
Posted by: Agent | February 05, 2009 at 02:32 PM
5-6 million for pedro? 661 you're kidding right?
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | February 05, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Agent, you think Andruw is gonna get a major league deal? With as many outfield FA's are still out there?
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | February 05, 2009 at 02:35 PM
Discussion: What would the Yankees want for Swisher from the Braves? Yankees fans and Braves fans please contribute.
I bet the Yanks would ask for Gorkys Hernandez in return for Swisher, which of course would not happen.
Posted by: paulyicecubes | February 05, 2009 at 02:38 PM
"Discussion: What would the Yankees want for Swisher from the Braves? Yankees fans and Braves fans please contribute.": First things first, as a Yankee fan I want to keep Nady and Swisher. With Nady starting and Swisher getting plenty at bats at 1B, DH and all three OF slots, the Yankees will finally have depth and flexibility. But for the sake of discussion, give me Francoeur. Well knowing that ain't gonna happen, I want a stud in return and since the Yankees need outfielders starting next year give me Jason Heyward or Jordan Schafer and some throw in minor leaguers, or both and let's make a deal.
Posted by: David | February 05, 2009 at 02:41 PM
"Agent, you think Andruw is gonna get a major league deal? With as many outfield FA's are still out there?"
I'm not saying that I think that, I'm just saying that Jones thinks that he could... which is why he turned down the deal I suppose.
Posted by: Agent | February 05, 2009 at 02:42 PM
Someone should let Cashman know he's going after the wrong Dodgers OF.
Posted by: money941 | February 05, 2009 at 02:45 PM
I bet the Yanks would ask for Gorkys Hernandez in return for Swisher, which of course would not happen.
_______________________
Agreed, no way the Braves give up a serious prospect. The Yankees aren't in a position where they have to get rid of Swisher and he isn't a bargain anymore. I know all the talk says the Braves are front-runners for him, but I can't imagine that deal happening unless Cashman just decides "What the hell, we got him for nothing and we can upgrade with Abreu cheap". Why would the Braves take on his $7M plus average salary when they could sign Abreu or Dunn for 2 years without giving up any prospects? Can't see a scenario that makes it happen, frankly.
Posted by: Brad426 | February 05, 2009 at 02:46 PM
I want a stud in return and since the Yankees need outfielders starting next year give me Jason Heyward or Jordan Schafer and some throw in minor leaguers, or both and let's make a deal.
_________________________
Please, of course the Yankees WANT a great return, but even Cashman wouldn't suggest that. Why give up a stud prospect that is going to be making the league minimum (or thereabouts) for a guy that had a terrible year last year? If the Braves offered Martin Prado and a pitching prospect the Yankees would jump at it. Then they would sign Abreu for depth.
Posted by: Brad426 | February 05, 2009 at 02:51 PM
"give me Francoeur. Well knowing that ain't gonna happen, I want a stud in return and since the Yankees need outfielders starting next year give me Jason Heyward or Jordan Schafer and some throw in minor leaguers, or both and let's make a deal."
Francoeur for Swisher would probably make sense value-wise, but the Braves would be plugging a hole with a hole and the Yankees would be trading away from a stockpile then turning around and adding to the stockpile. That trade just doesn't really make sense. As far as the other 2 people you mentioned, you realize that Jason Heyward and Jordan Schafer "project" to have MVP, maybe even HOF potential, right? Those are ridiculous demands for Swisher. I wouldn't trade 1 of Heyward or Schafer straight up for Swisher. Lets see, 6 years of MVP caliber talent or 3 years of Nick Swisher? Which would you rather have? I know you don't need right-handed fill in the blank pitchers or MLB-ready infielders. Outfielders is what you need? How about Josh Anderson and Brandon Jones? Anderson could definitely find some playing time off your bench and you get 6 years of Brandon Jones who could be a starting LF next year.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 02:56 PM
David - "I want a stud in return (for Swisher) and since the Yankees need outfielders starting next year give me Jason Heyward or Jordan Schafer and some throw in minor leaguers, or both and let's make a deal."
Thank you , I needed a good chuckle.
Posted by: paulyicecubes | February 05, 2009 at 03:03 PM
All of this is more reason why I don't think it's going to (or should) happen. The Yankees don't NEED to get rid of Swisher, so it would be pointless to settle for a bunch of throw-ins and scrubs in a nice little package with a bow. The Yankees are going to want something good (Schafer/Gorkys) in return, which the Braves are not willing to part with. The Braves are the ones with the need, not the Yankees. The Yankees could go into April with the team they have right now and be a serious threat... I think even Red Sox fans can agree with that.
Yankees "could use" a 5th starter if they feel that they want to move Joba to the pen, but that won't happen. The Yankees "could use" another bullpen arm or utility infielder, but neither are a need because they have a solid bullpen and Ransom is decent of the utility role. Like it or not... the Yankees are set right now, and no trade is necessary for them.
Posted by: Agent | February 05, 2009 at 03:09 PM
""Discussion: What would the Yankees want for Swisher from the Braves? Yankees fans and Braves fans please contribute.": First things first, as a Yankee fan I want to keep Nady and Swisher. With Nady starting and Swisher getting plenty at bats at 1B, DH and all three OF slots, the Yankees will finally have depth and flexibility. But for the sake of discussion, give me Francoeur. Well knowing that ain't gonna happen, I want a stud in return and since the Yankees need outfielders starting next year give me Jason Heyward or Jordan Schafer and some throw in minor leaguers, or both and let's make a deal.
Posted by: David | February 05, 2009 at 02:41 PM"
Good God Man
You get him for nothing, he puts on the NY cap and he magically is worthy of a package that would net Peavy?
Yeah okay
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | February 05, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Francoeur for Swisher would probably make sense value-wise
____________________________
Francoeur will make far less than Swisher even if he gets the full amount he wants in arbitration (which he won't, of course), so that deal doesn't make sense on its face, much less for all the other reasons you list.
Posted by: Brad426 | February 05, 2009 at 03:12 PM
I've heard my Bucs are looking for bounce-back type outfielders...why stop with Craig Monroe, anyway?
Posted by: piratefan14 | February 05, 2009 at 03:14 PM
If Andruw was going to take a minor league deal he probably would have signed with the Braves already.
Posted by: wisbrave | February 05, 2009 at 03:15 PM
The Yankees have needs at all three OF positions and catcher. They don't necessarily need pitching prospects, you can never have enough, but they have stockpiled a number of arms. Now they need to collect some position players. Hernandez, Schafer, Heyward or Flowers would be nice, but even a group of lower rated but promising prospects might do it.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | February 05, 2009 at 03:20 PM
Hey fellas -- It didn't say discuss a deal that would get done and, most importantly, you guys seem to miss the fact that I am a Yankee fan and I don't like the idea of the trade unless it is a steal. And yes I realize how good those two are, that's why I say shot for the best or else just don't do it.
Posted by: David | February 05, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Before anyone jumps on it, that was "shoot" not "shot".
Posted by: David | February 05, 2009 at 03:29 PM
Yanks should wait until all OF are off the board.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | February 05, 2009 at 03:29 PM
"David - "I want a stud in return (for Swisher) and since the Yankees need outfielders starting next year give me Jason Heyward or Jordan Schafer and some throw in minor leaguers, or both and let's make a deal.""
No, no, no, you're an idiot, and no.
Nick Swisher. Jake Peavy? What do these two have in common? Two things. One, they have both been linked to trade rumors with the Braves. Two, you threw the same ridiculous names out there. Guess what David? If Frank Wren isn't gonna give up those guys for Peavy, what makes you think he'd do it for an at-best fourth outfielder?? I'm sorry, but if Nick Swisher is the best we can do in Atlanta, then re-sign Andruw for God's sake. At least he'd be entertaining to watch.
No to Hanson, Heyward, Schafer, Flowers, Brandon Jones, Hernandez, and Juirrens (because I'm sure somewhere, a Yankee fan just drooled when I said his name.)
I personally think Swisher for Prado and a bucket of baseballs should do the trick.
Yankee fans sure are funny.
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | February 05, 2009 at 03:30 PM
Seriously if we trade any of Hernandez, Schaefer, and Heyward for garbage in my opinion Swisher Frank Wren better have his resignation letter right under the trade form.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 05, 2009 at 03:32 PM
"Hernandez, Schafer, Heyward or Flowers would be nice, but even a group of lower rated but promising prospects might do it."
1) The Braves traded Flowers to get Vazquez so that's not an option.
2) Hernandez makes the most sense of the 3 but it still seems like too much, the Yankees would need to throw a minor league arm or 2 in. The other 2 are out of the question.
Francoeur will make far less than Swisher even if he gets the full amount he wants in arbitration (which he won't, of course), so that deal doesn't make sense on its face, much less for all the other reasons you list.
1) The way arbitration works is Francoeur either wins his case and gets the full amount (3.95) or loses his case and gets what the Braves' offered (2.8). There's no middle ground once the parties go to arbitration.
2) Swisher makes 5.3 million next year, so 1.35 million isn't that much. It's the difference in having Matt Diaz and not having Matt Diaz.
3) That being said, it still doesn't make sense.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 03:32 PM
The underlying issue with asking what a team wants for a guy is that the responses you get would be what fans want for him not the team.
Posted by: ECT | February 05, 2009 at 03:33 PM
Braves fan, we traded Flowers in the Vasquez deal he is no longer tradeable.
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 05, 2009 at 03:34 PM
I wouldn't exactly say the Yankees got Swisher for nothing. They traded Scott Proctor for Wilson Betemit. At the time Proctor was a solid bullpen arm and had been very valuable for the Yankees. Betemit is a good utility guy who never really got the chance to play on a regular basis since he might have similar multi-position skills to a Chone Figgans or Willy Aybar. Jeff Marquez was ranked by Baseball America before the 2008 season as the Yankees #7 prospect. I don't really know much about Nunez.
Could the Yankees package Kennedy and Swisher to get Heyward or Schafer? How can you say either of those two have MVP or HOF potential? They haven't even played in the majors yet to prove themselves.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | February 05, 2009 at 03:34 PM
Jeff I see your point, but I have a question...
Why, if the Yankees have needs at all three outfield positions, would they be willing to listen to trade talk on at least two of them?
Swisher, Nady, Damon, Cabrera, Matsui, and Gardner. Granted, none of those names really jump off the page the way an A-Rod or Tiexeira does, but that's still not the worst outfield production in the game...
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | February 05, 2009 at 03:35 PM
Didn't know the Yanks had a need in RF
Posted by: DominicanYanks | February 05, 2009 at 03:35 PM
"Could the Yankees package Kennedy and Swisher to get Heyward or Schafer? How can you say either of those two have MVP or HOF potential? They haven't even played in the majors yet to prove themselves."
Nah, the Braves' don't really need starting pitchers.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 03:35 PM
I don't think the Yankees should trade Swisher. It is not often they (the Yankees)get a young player cheap. Swisher is coming off a down year. He is a much better player than a .219 batting avg with 82 walks. The last time the Yankees picked up a player like this was in 1997 when they picked up Scott Brosius. The previous year he hit .203 for the A's in 428 ABs. They also picked up Paul O'Neill for Roberto Kelly from the Reds in 1993 after he hit .246 . Two years later he won a batting title.
So I wouldn't be too egar to trade a young player coming of a down year. You may miss a bounce back year.
Posted by: Since_77 | February 05, 2009 at 03:37 PM
My bad on Flowers being an option he was listed on Baseball Prospectus and hadn't realized he was traded before.
Bamabosoxfan, I agree its a solid outfield, but I was thinking more in terms of the 2010 season and long term. Damon, Matsui, and Nady are all Free Agents at the end of the 2009 season. That leaves the Yankees with Swisher, Cabrera and Gardner. Then you have a lot of unanswered questions.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | February 05, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Could the Yankees package Kennedy and Swisher to get Heyward or Schafer? How can you say either of those two have MVP or HOF potential? They haven't even played in the majors yet to prove themselves."
I will take my chances since Kennedy and Swisher have both proven they suck at the MLB level. Swisher is OK.... Kennedy haha......
Posted by: ScottBravesfan19 | February 05, 2009 at 03:43 PM
I'm surprised more teams would not be interested in Nady over Swisher. Nady is the better player, and renting him for the year may get you to convince him to stay. While Swisher deal was not bad a year ago, with the current financial climate it may wind up being bad in a year or two, especially if his drop continues.
And yes Andrew Jones thinks he's going to get a major league deal, thats why he turned down the yanks. I mean with a minor league deal with the Yanks, unless he's truly back in shape (which doesn't seem to be the case), he will not make the 25 out of spring. With a lot of other teams he will, I bet he gets a one year major from desperate team.
Posted by: JudgeNY | February 05, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Bamabosoxfan, I agree its a solid outfield, but I was thinking more in terms of the 2010 season and long term. Damon, Matsui, and Nady are all Free Agents at the end of the 2009 season. That leaves the Yankees with Swisher, Cabrera and Gardner. Then you have a lot of unanswered questions.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | February 05, 2009 at 03:43 PM
------------------------------
The Yankees hope that Austin Jackson will be in center by 2010.
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/prospects/y2009/profile.jsp?t=p_top&pid=457706
Posted by: Since_77 | February 05, 2009 at 03:46 PM
"I'm surprised more teams would not be interested in Nady over Swisher. Nady is the better player, and renting him for the year may get you to convince him to stay."
Nady is represented by Scott Boras. So he's not staying.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 03:50 PM
The hyperbole going on in this section is pretty hilarious. Its completely useless to throw around the term "HOF potential" when speaking about Prospects in AA ball. It serves no purpose other then to artificially over hype your teams prospects.
Also to the person who said Francoeur and Swisher provide similar value, i have no clue what sport you are watching. Franco. has shown half the production that Swisher has.
It serves the Yankees no purpose to trade Swisher unless they fill a need with a quality player ie at least Gorkys. Why would they trade their starting RFer for utility guys or bp arms.
Its simple keep both Nady and Swisher and Nady gets 400 or so ABs backing up LF,RF,DH and !st
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 05, 2009 at 03:51 PM
I don't think the Braves giving up Gorkys for Swisher is so out of line. But, I wonder why the Yankees' fans even want him... isn't he pretty much a duplicate of Jackson?
Posted by: AtlantaMike | February 05, 2009 at 03:56 PM
I don't think the Braves giving up Gorkys for Swisher is so out of line. But, I wonder why the Yankees' fans even want him... isn't he pretty much a duplicate of Jackson?
Posted by: AtlantaMike | February 05, 2009 at 03:56 PM
----------------
I think he has less power then Jackson, but the more options you have the better chance of one of them panning out.
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 05, 2009 at 04:00 PM
"The hyperbole going on in this section is pretty hilarious. Its completely useless to throw around the term "HOF potential" when speaking about Prospects in AA ball. It serves no purpose other then to artificially over hype your teams prospects."
I understand what you're saying. However, you're misinterpreting what I'm trying to say. Yes, it would be stupid to suggest that Heyward or Schafer is going to the hall of fame. I give it less than 1%. However, they do have the POTENTIAL to one day be in hall of fame.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 04:02 PM
"I think he has less power then Jackson, but the more options you have the better chance of one of them panning out."
____
Yeah, Cosa, that's kind of how I feel about him in Atlanta.
Posted by: AtlantaMike | February 05, 2009 at 04:03 PM
"Also to the person who said Francoeur and Swisher provide similar value, i have no clue what sport you are watching. Franco. has shown half the production that Swisher has."
Until last season Francoeur showed more production than Swisher. And he's improved his plate discipline this off-season. Just ask the master of plate-discipline, Larry Jones.
http://atlanta.braves.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090127&content_id=3775308&vkey=news_atl&fext=.jsp&c_id=atl
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 04:07 PM
"The hyperbole going on in this section is pretty hilarious. Its completely useless to throw around the term "HOF potential" when speaking about Prospects in AA ball. It serves no purpose other then to artificially over hype your teams prospects."
I understand what you're saying. However, you're misinterpreting what I'm trying to say. Yes, it would be stupid to suggest that Heyward or Schafer is going to the hall of fame. I give it less than 1%. However, they do have the POTENTIAL to one day be in hall of fame.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 04:02 PM
----------
I agree they are GREAT prospects and any club would absolutely love to have them but its still hard for me to agree with that statement, not trying to insult you and i apologize if i came off that way, its just that for me to talk about HOF potential a prospect has to be a once in a decade type like Alex Rodriguez, Ken Griffey Jr or Josh Hamilton was. I just dont see Heyward or Jordan stacking up to those guys prospectwise
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 05, 2009 at 04:11 PM
I originally said they had MVP, maybe even HOF potential. I'm pretty sure this is universally accepted. The list of players that had HOF potential is about 10000 times as long as the list of actual Hall of Famers. Really, HOF potential means nothing. The realization of HOF potential is what counts. I'm not saying any of these players will realize that potential, but the potential IS there and you can't really argue with that.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 04:17 PM
"Also to the person who said Francoeur and Swisher provide similar value, i have no clue what sport you are watching. Franco. has shown half the production that Swisher has."
Until last season Francoeur showed more production than Swisher. And he's improved his plate discipline this off-season. Just ask the master of plate-discipline, Larry Jones.
--------------
Which stats are you looking at? Swisher has a better OPS, hits more HRs and in general just gets on base more then Frenchy
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 05, 2009 at 04:18 PM
"Which stats are you looking at? Swisher has a better OPS, hits more HRs and in general just gets on base more then
Frenchy"
Ya. You're actually right. Frenchy's only + is his fielding. Which was well-above average every year except last as opposed to Swisher who has teetered around average for most of his career. However, Swisher doesn't exactly run away with the OPS category. Overall, they're close to even. Probably slight edge to Swisher, but Francoeur's upside helps his case.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Well swisher has a 60 pt career advantage and much better plate discipline over all. Frenchys just seems like hes allergic to taking a walk seeing as he swings at everything. His production would fly in center but in the corners hes below average. Hes actually more comparable to Nady, which Nady getting the slight edge. But Swisher is simply a better player then Jeff at this point.
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 05, 2009 at 04:38 PM
First off,
Gorkys should be traded only for 44 or Brian Roberts. That alone is too much for Swish.
I'd love to swap 2nd basemen but oh well
Prado and Redmond for Swisher
Posted by: Bravesfan10 | February 05, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Prado and Redmond for Swisher
Posted by: Bravesfan10 | February 05, 2009 at 04:56 PM
----------------
Again, While you make think thats a fair deal(i disagree) how on earth does that make sense for the yankees? Trade a starting player for a utility infielder?
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 05, 2009 at 05:22 PM
Why the braves would even want Swisher is beyond me.. Give up players and spend 20 plus million. How about just signing Dunn or Abreu.. Even Garret Anderson.
Oh smack017 your a complete joke. If the Ads bother you why not go to internet options and block the site?
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | February 05, 2009 at 05:43 PM
"Nady is represented by Scott Boras. So he's not staying."
No that just means he's not signing an extension, not that he wont stay, if he likes a place he may return (especially if they offer the most money). I also don't know how many players are really listening to Boras after this season.
Posted by: JudgeNY | February 05, 2009 at 05:45 PM
Yanks don't need any pitchers or pitching prospects, they are stocked as is and would be better served just keeping both players. They would only be trading one or the other for a quality OF or middle infield prospect.
Posted by: JudgeNY | February 05, 2009 at 05:53 PM
"Yanks don't need any pitchers or pitching prospects, they are stocked as is and would be better served just keeping both players. They would only be trading one or the other for a quality OF or middle infield prospect."
That pretty much answers my original question.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | February 05, 2009 at 06:03 PM
would you be pleased if he turned out to have the same production as Swisher? let's say ops+ as the measurement. this way, it doesn't matter if you are an obp guy or an avg guy.
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | February 05, 2009 at 07:27 PM
) The way arbitration works is Francoeur either wins his case and gets the full amount (3.95) or loses his case and gets what the Braves' offered (2.8). There's no middle ground once the parties go to arbitration.
2) Swisher makes 5.3 million next year, so 1.35 million isn't that much. It's the difference in having Matt Diaz and not having Matt Diaz.
____________________________
1) I said if he gets the full amount he wants, which he won't. Meaning he will settle in the middle or he won't win his arbitration case.
2) Yes, Swisher makes $5.3M in 2009, but he is owed $22M (if you include his $1M buy out) over the next 3 years, which is way more than Francoeur will make over that span.
3) Agreed.
Posted by: Brad426 | February 05, 2009 at 07:40 PM
DA METS...Mets will land Andruw Jones and Beimel...We will be playing the Red Sox in the World Series again..The Red Sox will play Minnesota for A.L. and The Mets will Beat the Cards (which will sign Manny)for N.L.
Posted by: da mets | February 06, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Play Matt Diaz in left and give him the job for the season. He will do well. Keep Frenchy and Prado. Do not waste any more time with the Yankees unless you can trade Wren for Cashman.
Posted by: secretone | February 06, 2009 at 11:44 AM
There are some really DUMB comments on here today:
"That trade just doesn't really make sense. As far as the other 2 people you mentioned, you realize that Jason Heyward and Jordan Schafer "project" to have MVP, maybe even HOF potential, right"?
LOL!! You're talking about two kids that didn't even make it out of AA ball yet! If I had a quarter for every HOF A prospect that failed, I'd fix the economy!
"I will take my chances since Kennedy and Swisher have both proven they suck at the MLB level. Swisher is OK.... Kennedy haha......"
HUH??? Kennedy just turned 24, is a top pick and stud prospect that was rushed to the show. He's dominated every step in the minors. In 07' he was 1-0 1.90 in 3 starts with the Yankees. A few down starts last year, all of a sudden he's crap? Ah, NO.
Swisher had a down year last year, but he's a switch hitter that can play 4 positions, give you .260/.370 25 90 and led the league in pitches seen per ab. Get a clue before you bash guys!!
"However, they do have the POTENTIAL to one day be in hall of fame"
STILL a ridiculous statement. The Yankees have guys in A ball that have little league numbers....50 innings, 90k's 1.0 eras....should we pencil them in next to Goose and Guidry before they even hit the show?
"Swisher, Nady, Damon, Cabrera, Matsui, and Gardner. Granted, none of those names really jump off the page the way an A-Rod or Tiexeira does, but that's still not the worst outfield production in the game..."
You're right Sox fan...and I'd take Matsui, Damon, Nady and Swish over Bay, Ellsbury, Nancy Drew and Kotsay ANY day of the week!
"I personally think Swisher for Prado and a bucket of baseballs should do the trick".
So we should trade a young player who we got for a slice of pizza... who can play 4 positions, switch-hit and easily get .260/.370 25 90 for a utility IF? And you think Yankees fans are funny? Look in the mirror my friend....then go back to the Rag Sox board, you're clearly lost.
"The Yankees have needs at all three OF positions and catcher"
OF, yes...for next year. We already have enough now. As for C?? Jorge still has 3 more. Molina is a great back-up. Cervelli has a cannon. Romine is a top prospect. We just signed that kid from Boston. Montero may be our best prospect although he may "outgrow" the position. How do we need help at catcher?
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | February 06, 2009 at 04:07 PM
1.) Jones is a joke. Sign the contract and re-prove yourself in the minors or forget about playing MLB ball again pal.
2.) Discussion: What would the Yankees want for Swisher from the Braves? Yankees fans and Braves fans please contribute.
------------
As others have mentioned, hopefully nothing comes of that trade rumor. I'd like nothing more than to see the X man and Swisher in the starting lineup come opening day. I don't think they'll get Swisher's value out of the Braves, b/c of the obvious desire for a top prospect in change (which the Braves surely won't give up...)
Posted by: JL | February 06, 2009 at 06:49 PM
yankees should sign him for 1 year 1mill what is the worst that could happen its a low risk for a player that hit 50HR 2 or 3 years ago.
Posted by: alex | February 07, 2009 at 08:43 AM