![]() |
|
|
| |
« Hudson To Royals A Long Shot | Main | Indians Sign Graffanino To Minor League Deal »
SUNDAY, 9:34am: Jim Callis of Baseball America has the numbers: "A baseball source said Fields will receive $1.75 million, splitting the difference between MLB’s $1.5 million recommendation for his draft slot and the $2 million he was seeking, pending the results of a physical he took on Saturday."
Callis notes while the deadline to sign draft picks was August 15, Fields and Seattle were allowed to continue negotiations due to Fields having exhausted his college eligibility.
FRIDAY, 7:07pm: The Seattle Mariners have reached an agreement with Josh Fields, their first-round selection in the 2008 draft, MLB.com's Jim Street reports.
Street writes that the deal was delayed by a $500,000 gap between the $2MM deal he wanted and the $1.5MM the Mariners were offering.
Fields, 23, was the closer for Georgia in 2008. He also was the Southeastern Conference Pitcher of the Year last season while helping the Bulldogs reach the finals of the NCAA College World Series.
The Mariners selected him as the 20th overall selection.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
One less first round pick for Zdurenick, who has a really good scouting eye, to use on a high upside position player or starting pitcher.
Instead, they get Josh Fields, a closer. Fun.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Agreed.
This team needs a closer.. why?
I would have much rather had Z make his own pick at 21 this year than have a petulant, greedy RELIEVER like Fields.
I just hope they don't invite him to camp this year. The guy doesn't deserve a shot at the opening day roster.
Posted by: thr33niL | February 13, 2009 at 07:37 PM
I wanna see a Josh Fields (CWS) vs Josh Fields (SEA) match up.
/fo reals
Posted by: CubsLuck | February 13, 2009 at 07:39 PM
I'm from GA i've seen Josh Fields and yeah, OVERHYPED!!! he chokes is the clutch and his fastball is as straigt as i don't know what. sorry man.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | February 13, 2009 at 07:41 PM
lol i thought this josh fields was the one in chicago.
Posted by: Selwonk | February 13, 2009 at 07:42 PM
Enjoy, Mariners fans.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | February 13, 2009 at 07:47 PM
"This kid is nasty and could be the next great closer."
I'm telling you, I saw him for 3 or 4 years with my own eyes and he will not be a good closer in the pros. He is to cocky and shakes off the catcher way way to much.
Posted by: bravoboy10 | February 13, 2009 at 07:54 PM
This guy has two great pitches. Greedy is lame though.
Posted by: RoyOswaltSteroidFree | February 13, 2009 at 07:55 PM
I'd be surprised if Z couldn't have done more with the 21st pick.
Fields has limited upside, plain and simple.
Considering his track record in Milwaukee, I think this signing is mistake.
Not so much because of what's wrong with Fields, but I just think they're limiting their options and the upside they could receive from the draft.
Posted by: scribbletone | February 13, 2009 at 08:09 PM
"He is to cocky and shakes off the catcher way way to much."
His cockiness is his weak trait, but he has the stuff to overcome that in a "closer's" role. He probably can't be stretched out to start though, ala Brandon Morrow. I wouldn't put him at the level of Francoeur/Delmon Young though.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 08:24 PM
thr33niL-
I don't live in/near Seattle neither do I follow the Mariners much(although I do read LL and USSM quite a bit as a baseball fan simply b/c of how great the content is). I know the M's blogosphere was opposed to signing Fields, but how was the general atmosphere in Seattle? Do you think this move was PR motivated (since there is negative stigma associated with not signing your first round picks) in any way?
I just can't grasp why Z would do something like this. PR would be the only explanation IMO.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 08:27 PM
This has got to be a suck up attempt to Boras.
"Look Scott, we will sign Fields if you convince Strasburg not to sign with Washington and have him fall to us!"
Probably not but I think a few others (including Green and Ackley) are Boras advised clients as well, iirc.
Posted by: thr33niL | February 13, 2009 at 08:30 PM
All of you guys saying you saw him, and he is over hyped, and isn't good... I am sure the scouts that spent months watching and analyzing him know a bit more about a pitcher than you do.
I am a HUGE M's fan, and personally am not happy about the signing because I think drafting a RP in the 1st round is a waste, but that does not mean he isn't good. I am sure that if a RP is good enough to even be in consideration for a first round pick, then he must be pretty dang good at what he does.
Cockiness is almost a good trait in a RP. And to the fact that he shakes off too much, often times in clutch situations (mostly not in the MLB) the catcher will throw down a 'shake off' sign, it is to intimidate. And if in fact he is shaking off the catcher, that is something that CAN be fixed overnight... one visit by the GM telling him not to do that will end it.
Posted by: SwarzakGuy40 | February 13, 2009 at 08:30 PM
thr33niL-
I don't live in/near Seattle neither do I follow the Mariners much(although I do read LL and USSM quite a bit as a baseball fan simply b/c of how great the content is). I know the M's blogosphere was opposed to signing Fields, but how was the general atmosphere in Seattle? Do you think this move was PR motivated (since there is negative stigma associated with not signing your first round picks) in any way?
I just can't grasp why Z would do something like this. PR would be the only explanation IMO.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 08:27 PM
------------------------------
I really don't know.
Zduriencik always talked about making progress with Fields but most everyone figured he was just paying lip service and wasn't even interested because obviously he wanted to make his own pick.
I think this really comes asa shock to the more knowledgeable Seattle fans because no one ever really thought Z was serious about it.
Like I said, I think a lot of the motivation behind this was to continue a good working relationship with Boras since the Mariners will undoubtedly sign one of his clients in the near future.
Posted by: thr33niL | February 13, 2009 at 08:34 PM
I highly doubt there was a PR motivation. Most Seattle fans probably don't even know who this guy is. If anything, it might have been done to throw Boras a bone and make nice for future deals. Either that, or Zduriencik and his scouts know something the rest of us don't.
Posted by: section331 | February 13, 2009 at 08:38 PM
"Look Scott, we will sign Fields if you convince Strasburg not to sign with Washington and have him fall to us!"
I wish
Posted by: SwarzakGuy40 | February 13, 2009 at 08:41 PM
I'd think that the Prince Fielder and Matt LaPorta draftings, both Boras clients chosen by Z in MIL. Since the head scouts do have a say in the signings/negotiations, that could show some relationship b/w Z and Boras.
And the Mariners have signed more than their fair share of Boras clients in the last 3-4 years(Washburn, Beltre, Jeff Weaver, Wilkerson). And Carlos Triunfel, if you're thinking prospects.
Although the M's are probably going to have to deal with Boras in the '09 draft though (I *think* Ackley is Boras advised, but I'm not sure).
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 08:46 PM
"Either that, or Zduriencik and his scouts know something the rest of us don't."
I just don't see Z as the type to value closers this highly. And stretching Fields out to be a starter is stupid; use the pick to draft an actual starter.
It had to be either Boras or PR. Absolutely had to. Just an absolute head-scratcher, based on my perceptions of Z. Which are probably heavily skewed and incorrect.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 08:50 PM
Or Lincoln/Armstrong executed this whole thing.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 08:50 PM
All of you act like you know what you are talking about. Z doesnt know what he's doing Fields is Overhyped he is cocky and he folds under pressure the only funny thing is no one knows the guy or has seen him pitch or obviously looked at his stats sure he went 3-2 3.38 era not that great considering he was in a conference with Justin Smoak Pedro Alzarez just to name the ones I remember from last year so let me check something oh..... he converted 18 of 18 of his save opportunities oh damn so much for folding under pressure what was his era? 0.47 Holy Cow thats great! BTW in the 18 saves he pitched 19 innings and only gave up 3 hits only 1 run just 12 walks with 32 strikeouts and none of the 15 runners that he inherited scored so eat that all of you idiots no wonder the SONICS left they were tired of listening to morons!
Posted by: Justin | February 13, 2009 at 09:07 PM
The cockiness is a good thing, and you're right, he doesn't fold under pressure.
Here's why M's fans don't like the deal (and I'm not an M's fan, I'm an outsider). A team that is pretty much REBUILDING does NOT need a closer.
Fields is a closer who will easily be in the bigs in 2009. There is VERY limited upside for even the most elite closers.
The draft pick would have been put to much better use drafting either a position player or a starting pitcher.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 09:15 PM
above comment directed at Justin.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 13, 2009 at 09:15 PM
With the talent in this draft, that pick could have gone to something much more productive.
However, if Fields is up by this year and he puts up the numbers he's capable of. He could be traded in the long run for a bounty of prospects. Who knows, just trying to find some positives for saddened Mariner's fans.
Posted by: bravesrule14 | February 13, 2009 at 09:36 PM
I agree with you to an extent melonis. A rebuilding team doesnt need a closer but at 23 just say it takes the Mariners 5 years to get back to 85 wins or so that puts Fields at 28 a seasoned solid vet at the closers role just ask the mets you cant do much without a closer or bullpen, thats just my point. And much as everyone says they can get more value at the 21st pick next year I dont totally agree with you never know what you are getting with the high School kids at least with fields giving health and progress they know what they are getting.
Posted by: Justin | February 13, 2009 at 10:33 PM
I thought Brandon Morrow was going to be the closer?
are they gonna make him a starter again?
sorry Mariner fans I dont follow your team quite well
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | February 13, 2009 at 10:55 PM
I understand the disappointment from some Mariner fans that Fields could potentially have been a high ceiling position player or starting pitcher but Fields is an immediate return on the investment (and you can't say that about many draft picks). Given the vacancy for the closer's role in Seattle, he could build up value quickly once he emerges and then the Mariners can flip him for a package of players to help. Fields will contribute in the short-term and could potentially become more long-term pieces for the team. It's a smart, lower-risk investment.
[For those knocking Fields' stuff, his curve is spectacular. When he struggled (2007) his issue was fastball command. That wasn't a problem for him in 2008 as he returned to his dominant form. If you want to knock anything about Joshua Fields, look to his Bronson Arroyo-like haircut.]
Posted by: TNS | February 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM
melonis - eh, you could be right; so far during the offseason, through various interviews and other events I've attended, closing didn't seem to be a huge concern. I do think what it boils down to is a lot of our future picks are Boras clients; it's just as simple as that.
Bleacher Bum - it's all good. The plan is to have Morrow jockey for a starting position, no pun intended. The FO no longer seems him as a closer. Of course, a lot of this will depend on ST, but that is what we have been told.
Posted by: section331 | February 14, 2009 at 12:26 AM
" If you want to knock anything about Joshua Fields, look to his Bronson Arroyo-like haircut."
I like the hair though. Not enough MLB players grow out their hair.
Although it will be entertaining from a hair perspective to see Fields pitch to Travis Buck or Aaron Cunningham, since they both have similar hair, IIRC.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 14, 2009 at 07:24 AM
I don't like this signing. Fields is 23 which does not give the Mariners much time to decide what to do with him. They probably have a 3-5 window, wheras most prospects have 4-7 year window.
Posted by: JuniorUmpire | February 14, 2009 at 08:35 AM
I think making Morrow a closer at this point is a waste of his upside.
He's proven that he has a decent chance of being a starter long term, and with his stuff he could be an ace-quality pitcher with some time.
The potential of a Felix-Morrow 1-2 punch at the top of the rotation is very tantalizing.
Posted by: scribbletone | February 14, 2009 at 10:17 AM
how is this bad for the mariners? they get a cheap closer for the next 5 years. you get to put morrow back where he belongs. in that division with felix and a possible healthy bedard you could make some noise. get the confidence up of your young players and possibly make a run at a division title in the next year or two
Posted by: derman1984 | February 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM
Seattle is in a rebuild mode. I think this signing isn't for 2009 as much as it is for the seasons after.
Agreed, the team may not need a closer for 2009, but the decision to sign Fields now may represent a vision toward contending in 2010 or 2011, in which case they will need a closer. He may not be the closer this year, but he could have the job for 2010 or 2011 and beyond, if it works out.
The Mariners are looking toward rebuilding with youth. If Fields is really one of the better young prospects out there for closing games, what's the harm in signing him now and grooming him for the job?
Posted by: Slothcliff Hokum | February 14, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Jack Zduriencik is not a dumb guy. I'm sure he looked at the talent that would be available at #20 in the upcoming draft and decided signing Fields was the better option. This should also assure Morrow of being in the rotation.
Posted by: MPM | February 14, 2009 at 12:38 PM
^^Agreed, good post. Z seems to really know what he is doing right now.
Posted by: B3NG4L | February 14, 2009 at 01:21 PM
Even if Fields wasn't signed, Morrow needs to be in the rotation regardless. There is zero question about that. Zero.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 14, 2009 at 02:37 PM
I'm from Athens, and watched Josh pitch more than a lot. I think he could be really, really good. I'm not sure if he'll last 10+ years in the league, because he puts SO much effort into throwing 96-99mph (he literally grunts 75% of the time), but while he's there, I think he'll be pretty darn good.
Furthering that point, I've stood next to the guy numerous times on campus, after games, etc., and I'd put his max size at 5'11", 180, absolute MAX. I don't see Fields as the same freak of nature as Lincecum, but who knows how long he'll last either.
Josh is strictly a two-pitch pitcher, IMO - The 98mph gas, and a 78-82 twelve-to-six hammer of a curve. I see no way he'll be converted to a starter.
Josh has good makeup as a closer. Despite his size (or lack thereof), he's quite intimidating (his hair, grunts, and his closer/bulldog mentality that he IS going to get you out).
Overall, I really do like the pick for the Mariners. Although the Mariners aren't in dire need of a closer today, who knows when it will come in handy to have a guy like Josh, be it a future trade, or somehow the M's are in contention in the near future.
The kid has great, great stuff and in my mind, really has what it takes to be a ML closer. From his arsenal to the intimidation factor.
Posted by: LG2400 | February 14, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Just from the looks at it, it seems to me that JZ looked at how weak the draft is, outside of the top 5 or 10, and realized that he might as well sign the high-upside Fields, and not waste the pick on a less talented player in the 09 draft.
I trust Z and think that he has his reasons for signing him. Plus, I've read his fastball isn't all that straight, and on top of that filthy curveball, he has the potential to be a nasty closer.
Posted by: baseballismylyf4 | February 14, 2009 at 03:02 PM
I've seen this kid pitch a lot and he is great player. I feel confident he can have a career infront of him. I don't see him being a lights out closer but he can for sure be one of the top set up men in the league.
Posted by: snoot titanic | February 14, 2009 at 03:10 PM
Is it possible that the M's try to convert Fields to a starter? The Jays drafted Maryland closer Brett Cecil in 2007, and have been using him as a starter. He has been putting up some nice numbers in that role too. Maybe Fields would be the same?
Posted by: JaysOwnAll | February 15, 2009 at 10:30 AM
"Is it possible that the M's try to convert Fields to a starter? The Jays drafted Maryland closer Brett Cecil in 2007, and have been using him as a starter. He has been putting up some nice numbers in that role too. Maybe Fields would be the same?
"
I really, really don't think so.
Cecil was much younger when drafted (he was 20 when drafted; Fields is 23). Gives them a less refined body of work to meld.
And, I really think Cecil's arsenal is better than Fields'.
There really is no reason to sign Fields just to stretch him out to be a starter. Much easier just to use the pick to sign a college SP.
Posted by: melonis rex | February 15, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Totally agree with melonis here.
The Mariners simply have to intend on using this guy as their long term closer, because otherwise I don't see the logic behind it.
Stretching him out to become a starter, the way teams did with guys like Cashner, Moskos and Cecil, doesn't seem to be the route here.
As melonis pointed out, Fields' age and stuff make it more likely that he'll stay in the bullpen.
Not to mention the talk around the game that he's rather arrogant and stubborn, although stuff like this is pretty arguable and unclear.
If the Mariners had intended on turning Fields into a starter, they probably would've just given the pick to Z and told him to draft a starter.
Posted by: scribbletone | February 15, 2009 at 11:25 AM
The M's may have done this as a gesture to Scott Boras, considering he's employed by some of the best. It'll also give them more money to spend on each individual draft pick this next draft, with the way the economy is, and what not.
Posted by: Humongo | February 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM
This would make sense if they were actually going to contend. Fields is straight up nasty and has that mentality and makeup that makes a closer great. still bad move by seattle, they could have used a position player or a starter
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | February 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM