![]() |
|
|
| |
« The Pudge Rodriguez Market | Main | The Remaining Free Agent Market »
Peter Schmuck of the Baltimore Sun has the latest on Brian Roberts' no-trade clause and an Orioles signing:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
good. keep him out of the division. besides, the Jays are moving backwards as a franchise. we might sneak past them this year
Posted by: trmahoney01 | February 21, 2009 at 01:28 PM
roberts should just play baseball
Posted by: rockford | February 21, 2009 at 01:45 PM
What do you mean by "roberts should just play baseball"? You don't think he should be allowed to protect his (and his new wife's) best interest? The fact that the Orioles won't consider trading him anytime before 2013 aside, Roberts has every right to have in his contract that he would not want to be traded to certain teams in locations he doesn't want to go. Did you say "Peavy should just play baseball" when he was telling the Padres where he would and wouldn't allow himself to be traded? Or, how about "Giles should just play baseball" when he decided against letting himself be traded to Boston last July? What about you? Do you work for a company that has offices in other cities? Should you "just go to work" if the company decides they need you to work in an office 1500 miles away?
Maybe I'm reading into this more than was there, but at some point the whole "the players are making so much money they should just shut up and play ball" argument gets stupid.
Posted by: mstrchef13 | February 21, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Don't mind him. He's just sick of the Roberts rumors and assuming the constant Roberts rumors on sites like this are somehow encouraged by Roberts himself, which is just false. Roberts has constantly tried the find the most friendly polite way to tell reporters to leave him alone so he can play ball for the last 2 years. To his credit he never turned into a cliche of a surly ballplayer who reacted to the reporters in anger or frustration. He's the epitome of what a good ballplayer who does it the right way should be.
Posted by: basemonkey | February 21, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Silly of Roberts to waste one of his no trade teams on the Blue Jays. No chance they're interested and no chance the Orioles would trade him there. Royals make sense obviously.
Posted by: andagh | February 21, 2009 at 03:56 PM
The O's will regret giving him a no-trade clause when he's in his decline (which will be soon), just like the Pads do with Peavy and Giles. All this money and years for a sub .800 career OPS.
Posted by: rockstrongo | February 21, 2009 at 03:56 PM
rockstrongo,
If you read the article, it basically is a very limited no trade clause until he becomes a 10-5 player anyways.
Posted by: basemonkey | February 21, 2009 at 04:46 PM
I love it when a reader give us their opinions without reading the article. To them the first few sentences of MLBTR is pretty much enough.
Posted by: basemonkey | February 21, 2009 at 04:48 PM
I'm divided on the Roberts signing, given the Orioles' timetable for success- they may have been better off waiting things out and checking out the trade landscape toward the deadline. There's some question whether any contenders would really need Roberts or whether they would offer any real premium prospects, but you can make a case for playing wait and see. As an O's fan, I love Roberts and there's a lot to be said for a guy as good on the field and in the community; a true leader and legit star. Still, if at all possible, a TOP prospect or two might've been preferable. I guess McPhail figured, 'a bird in hand...' and there's a ton of projection and uncertainty to the seeing what's out there, but the alternative was signing a second baseman whose game is predicated upon speed, to a four year extension beginning at age 32 and ending when he's 36. On the plus hand, its not an entirely unwieldy contract; $10M/per isn't out of control. Still, it won't be an easy deal to move for at least the first two years...and after that, his numbers will likely begin to decline. Looking at the O's over the past few years, with a ton of useless vets, I question the wisdom. On the other hand, sentiment and present value...as well as the relatively reasonable deal, lead me to stalemate. For now I suppose I'll trust that MacPhail knows what he's doing and that the prospective returns wouldn't have made a trade worth it. I wish that it were a 2 or 3 year contract, giving the Birds more flexibility, but that wasn't in the cards. I'll live. It isn't like we have anyone in the system close to being ready to take over for BRob, and this deal coincides with a basic timetable for LJ Hoes, so...
Roberts- barring injury- shouldn't drop off too much, given his attention to conditioning and late-bloomer status, and the new deal doesn't run through some ancient age. While he's likely to drop off a bit, I would be surprised if its a dramatic slide. Altogether it's...OK. By 2011, with Markakis, Jones, and either Pie or Reimold making up one of the more dynamic young outfields in baseball, Wieters behind the dish, Roberts at second, and a staff that could include Jeremy Guthrie, Chris Tillman, Brian Matusz, Jake Arrieta, and Brandon Erbe- for instance- there's a chance BRob DOES finally get a shot at competing. He definitely deserves it.
Oh and rockstrongo... OPS is one friggin' stat. This is what I absolutely HATE about sabermetric D-bags!!! Whenever they want to make a value-based point, they break out the stats and find one that makes a guy look like butt. No, BRob doesn't have a high slugging percentage- he doesn't hit a ton of home runs. BUT, he does have solid power for a second baseman, including very good gap power (look at his extra base hits), and, more importantly, has a very high OBP, sees more pitchers per at bat than nearly any hitter in the AL, steals a ton of bags, plays an excellent second base (although that, again, can be presented one way or another, depending on the stats used), plays a tremendous role in the community (not relevant as a player, but it does matter re: contract), and is an excellent clubhouse leader. You...are an idiot.
Posted by: milehigh78 | February 22, 2009 at 08:20 AM
...and Hoes is Roberts' successor, barring a trade or a hiccup in Hoes' development. Ryan Adams has shown some impressive power for the position and is a decent prospect, but dude can't field and his peripherals- namely as far as plate discipline- don't track. Hoes killed it in the
GCL and, while that isn't the end all/be all, his K/BB rate as an 18 year old, was incredible and stood out immediately. That tells me, along with his athleticism and speed, that he's gonna be a good one. Obviously, he needs to work on his D- he has time, but will need it- and there no telling whether he'll develop legit power or not, but if he does...?!!! Wow. Lot o' ifs, but I'm telling y'all- if he develops power, Hoes is gonna wind up a BJ Upton clone. My opinion at least. Worth keeping an eye on in '09
Posted by: milehigh78 | February 22, 2009 at 08:26 AM
Unless I'm missing something, the contract spells out the possibility of any trade happening sooner rather than later based on the escalating no trade clauses as he ages. I do find it funny though that some people are standing on the edge of fan-based bridges ready to jump over this contract. If Roberts played for another team with exactly the same stats and we signed him as a free agent this off season then these people would be grinning ear to ear. Sometimes the best trades are the ones you don't make.
Posted by: jamespinsky | February 22, 2009 at 08:35 AM