![]() |
|
|
| |
« Latest On Randy Wolf, Braden Looper | Main | Manny Turns Down Dodgers' One-Year Offer »
Free agent second baseman Orlando Hudson appeared on the MLB Network today. Barry Larkin asked which teams he's talking to, and he named the Dodgers, Mets, Yankees, and Nationals. None of the teams have said anything to Hudson's agent about changing positions. Hudson says right now he sees himself as a second baseman. Ken Rosenthal says Hudson "seems to be banking on [the Mets or Yankees] pursuing a creative solution."
Hudson, 31, hit .305/.367/.450 in 455 plate appearances for Arizona last year while earning $6.25MM. Based on the plus/minus system, Hudson did not flash his typical stellar glovework in '08. The market for Hudson has been held down partially because he is a Type A free agent who turned down the D'Backs offer of arbitration. That means whoever signs him will give up a draft pick. Another factor may be the broken wrist he suffered in August.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Dodgers arent doing anything until manram is out of the way. And Hudson can keep dreaming about the NY teams.
Posted by: tristau | February 02, 2009 at 11:38 PM
I think he would look good in cubbie blue!! I mean he has very good defense and then we could have fontenot/miles coming off the bench.
Posted by: FriendlyConfines25 | February 02, 2009 at 11:46 PM
This makes too much sense for the Mets not to pursue. Hell, with the way the market is going you might be able to get him for one year and an option. Bench Castillo if necessary.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | February 02, 2009 at 11:52 PM
Hudson, where would he play? loney, blake, dewitt, furcal is the infield. unless dewitt is going to the bench, which i dont think would be smart, let the kids play
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | February 02, 2009 at 11:53 PM
Would we see lawsuits if the yankees signed a player like hudson just as an intermediary to the team he really wanted to sign with and then traded him for someone the equivalent of a one round bump up on the draft pick they would give up.
Posted by: walkoffblast | February 02, 2009 at 11:53 PM
Dodgers could defenitely do well this offseason if they turn around and sign-
Dunn, Looper, Wolf, Hudson and Beimel all for 5, 5, 6, 6, and 2.
thats 24 million, for 5 players who would greatly help the team. if boras cant see this hes nuts, because NO ONE can tell me that manny is worth more then those players.
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | February 02, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Yea, FriendlyConfines25, the Cubs should take a look at Hudson. Could be the signing that moves Soriano out of the leadoff spot as well...
Whoever gets Hudson will probably get him for a bargain price.
I hope the Mets go after him. Castillo (slappy) is too frustrating, we need to get him out of here.
Posted by: 123456789 | February 02, 2009 at 11:57 PM
id love to see him in blue.. hate to see em give up the pick to the dbacks though. That would be an awesome defensive infield. Blake isnt anything special, but furcal o-dawg and loney would be sick. Have lorretta and Dewitt be the backups..
Posted by: derailone76 | February 03, 2009 at 12:11 AM
Yeah I was watching mlb tv when Ohud was being interviewed. I can't see the Yanks or Dodgers as teams still interested in his services. They each have 2B's they seem committed to already. I can see the Met's being interested depsite still having Castillo under contract, especially if he can be had on the cheap.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | February 03, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Castillo is about as useful as a jar of vegemite in an american house.
Posted by: tristau | February 03, 2009 at 12:52 AM
"This makes too much sense for the Mets not to pursue. Hell, with the way the market is going you might be able to get him for one year and an option. Bench Castillo if necessary."
How come you just keep on ignoring his putrid road splits? And that he is at the age where 2B start declining (have you forgotten Alfonso, Alomar, Baerga, and Castillo so quickly?), that he is coming off of two consecutive hand/wrist injuries that ended his season, and his declining defense? Unless he is signing for 1/4, then why go down this road again?
Posted by: nrmax88 | February 03, 2009 at 01:09 AM
If the Nationals were willing to spend money they could put together a much better team by signing Hudson and Dunn or Abreu. Both these guys could be cheaper than the bucks they wanted to shell out to Teixeria.
Some one posted on a Yankees blog that the Yanks could sign Hudson put him at 2B and then shift Robinson Cano to CF. Not sure how much I like the idea of moving Cano when he is still developing at 2B. One issue that was raised with the move is that Cano's speed might not be enough to handle CF in Yankee Stadium.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | February 03, 2009 at 01:14 AM
Yankees? Highly doubt it. Obviously the only way the Yanks go after Hudson is if they trade away Cano, and Cano would take a Matt Kemp and a pitcher to pry away from the Yanks. As would Kemp require Cano and a pitcher as well. Trade isn't happening. Hudson is not going to the Yanks.
My picks for where he might wind up: Jays, Rays, Rangers with a Kinsler shift to center, Hudson at 2b, but this is only if Sheets signs with the Rangers too (Hudson is not worth a 1st round pick), and I think the Cards are waiting with a contract offer if they ever find someone to take Kennedy.
Posted by: yanks09 | February 03, 2009 at 02:13 AM
"How come you just keep on ignoring his putrid road splits?"
Most players perform better at home, regardless of ballpark. There's just more of a comfort level with being cheered for as opposed to being booed. It's a mild concern, no doubt, but even on the Road he's been better then Castillo.
"And that he is at the age where 2B start declining (have you forgotten Alfonso, Alomar, Baerga, and Castillo so quickly?)"
So because the Mets have had poor luck picking 2B-men in the past they should stop trying? People like Jeff Kent managed to play at a high level well into their Late 30's.
"that he is coming off of two consecutive hand/wrist injuries that ended his season,"
He broke his wrist colliding with Brian McCann and injured his finger sliding into 3rd base. They're freak injuries, nothing more. They're not chronic knee injuries like Castillo has been dealing with.
"and his declining defense?"
Still Better then Castillo, and I trust his ability to rebound much better considering he doesn't have chronically injured knees.
"Unless he is signing for 1/4, then why go down this road again?"
That's the thing, I wouldn't be advocating this if he was still looking for a 4/40 contract, but I believe he can be had for somewhere around 6-8 million a year on a short term (1 or 2 years) deal. At that point, it's a potential bargain.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | February 03, 2009 at 05:48 AM
Sorry dunn and hudson but once the dodgers sign manny their almost going to have to go to D.C right.
Posted by: Dj 26 | February 03, 2009 at 06:23 AM
Jeff Levy:
What bothers me is that Kasten was willing to offer Tex $20 million for 9 years but isn't willing to get Dunn and O-Dog for pretty much the same price. If we can get them both we could be much better than last year.
Posted by: DCSportsGuy | February 03, 2009 at 06:36 AM
"Would we see lawsuits if the yankees signed a player like hudson just as an intermediary to the team he really wanted to sign with and then traded him for someone the equivalent of a one round bump up on the draft pick they would give up." -walkofblast
There is just so much wrong with this I don't know where to begin..
1. A team can't sign and trade.
2. The Yankees don't have a 1st round pick.
3. I don't think the Yankees can sign another type A FA.
Posted by: A | February 03, 2009 at 07:22 AM
its good the mets are going after..castillo needs to pack his bags and make way for the o-dog cause the he can hit in the two hole and he has very good defense....delgado, hudson, reyes, and wright thats a dirty infield
Posted by: metsman5 | February 03, 2009 at 07:49 AM
""seems to be banking on [the Mets or Yankees] pursuing a creative solution."
CF baby.
Damon-LF
Hudson-CF
Jeter-SS
Rodriguez-3B
Tex-1B
Nady-RF
Matsui-DH
Posada-C
Cano-2B
That would be some lineup.
Posted by: Gleb | February 03, 2009 at 08:48 AM
I have to say Gleb...I'm not a fan of that idea at all. OHud is 32 and a career IF. This isn't Babe Ruth League where every player can just play wherever he wants. Playing CF in spacious Yankee Stadium takes some skill level. Not to say he couldn't do it...but I'm not digging the experiment for us. Let Brett play there this year. He hit .290 in his second stint with the club, has a great arm and covers a butt load of ground in CF.
Damon, Jeter, ARod, Tex, Matsui, Nady, Cano, Posada and Gardner is a good line-up in itself...epecially with the new pitching staff.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | February 03, 2009 at 10:06 AM
Only way Hudson makes sense for the Yankees is to trade Cano to the Dodgers along with Kennedy to grab Kemp. Even then, I would hope it would only be a 2-3 year deal for Hudson.
If they could pull that off, the line-up would be ridiculous!
Damon, Jeter, ARod, Tex, Matsui, Kemp, Nady/Swish, Posada, Hudson!
Add to that CC, Wang, AJ, Andy and Joba...and WOW!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | February 03, 2009 at 10:12 AM
A, I think what walkoffblast was saying is that the if the yankees sign hudson they would only give up a 4th round pick so if they traded him for say a 3rd rounder they would move up. And yes they can still sign more type As. There was a whole big thing ob here a few days ago about the number of type A/Bs you could sign in one offseason and I think that number was like 8 or 9 this year.
Posted by: jpg1200 | February 03, 2009 at 12:32 PM
*on here
Posted by: jpg1200 | February 03, 2009 at 12:32 PM
DCSportsGuy:
I agree it is annoying. Hudson and Dunn combined might actually be more valuable than Teixeria. That would be a solid infield. I'm not very aware of the situation of the Nationals pitching rotation, but Tim Redding is gone and Odalis Perez is still on the market. Even if the rotation needs more depth solid defense is a start.
Posted by: Jeff Levy | February 03, 2009 at 04:29 PM
there is no way i would take hudson over cano cano is younger and had one bad year if this was one year ago this wouldnt even be a topic about moving or trading cano common lets be serious
Posted by: derek jestophatingter 26 | February 03, 2009 at 05:11 PM
"Most players perform better at home, regardless of ballpark. There's just more of a comfort level with being cheered for as opposed to being booed. It's a mild concern, no doubt, but even on the Road he's been better then Castillo."
Fair enough, though those are pretty enormous splits.
"So because the Mets have had poor luck picking 2B-men in the past they should stop trying? People like Jeff Kent managed to play at a high level well into their Late 30's."
Jeff Kent is an exception, not the rule. And yes, the Mets should stop giving out long term deals to second baseman over 30. Most 2B break down around this time.
"He broke his wrist colliding with Brian McCann and injured his finger sliding into 3rd base. They're freak injuries, nothing more. They're not chronic knee injuries like Castillo has been dealing with."
I understand that they are freak injuries. But they still happened. They make him more likely to re aggravate one of these injuries, and hand/wrist injuries will have an effect on what you do as a hitter. He is getting older, and it is harder to recover from these injuries.
I am with you, if he can be had for a 1 year deal (maybe a 2 year deal, worth no more then 10 million total), I would give him a shot, see what he can do for us. But anything more then that, and it is making the same mistake over again imo.
Posted by: nrmax88 | February 03, 2009 at 05:41 PM
the yankees would have to be stupid to sign hudson unless they could get a young gun for cano
Posted by: midnight5 | February 04, 2009 at 06:59 PM
Hudson < Cano
Yanks can sign another A free agent (not that they will), they just need to ask MLB permission, but because of the numbers this year there is a stipulation in the CBA. MLB would easily allow them to do this.
Yanks do still have a 1st rounder for compensation, for not signing last years.
I was unaware of any sign and trade rules in baseball.
Posted by: JudgeNY | February 04, 2009 at 10:09 PM