![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rockies, Atkins Avoid Arbitration | Main | Moorad, Moores Reach Agreement On Padres Sale »
4:13pm: The Rangers' minor league deal with Guardado is official, according to MLB.com's T.R. Sullivan.
TUESDAY, 7:48am: Wilson says Guardado "has agreed to return to the Rangers on a non-roster deal." Final details remain, and the deal could be worth up to $3MM.
MONDAY, 5:21pm: Jeff Wilson of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram spoke with Rangers GM Jon Daniels, who confirmed that a deal could be finalized for Guardado "within the next few days."
2:05pm: According to MLB.com's T.R. Sullivan, the Rangers are close to a deal to bring lefty reliever Eddie Guardado back to Texas. It may be completed in the next few days. Adding Guardado could help soften the blow of losing Joaquin Benoit to rotator cuff surgery.
Sullivan adds that the Rangers continue to look for pitching help beyond Guardado, with names like Jason Jennings, Kris Benson, and Chad Cordero in the mix.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
i'm amazed everyday eddy's arm is still attached.
Posted by: jaydestro | February 02, 2009 at 02:07 PM
What are you talking about? Guardado was about the only bright spot out of the Ranger's bullpen last year. I'm on board with bringing him back for one year.
Posted by: seanb1223 | February 02, 2009 at 02:24 PM
I created an account solely so I could tell kinsler5 he has no idea what he's talking about.
Eddie had 28 SO in 49 IP last year with the Rangers. He had a 3.65 ERA, which is pretty darn good considering the rest of our bullpen neared double digits.
Posted by: in the frying pan | February 02, 2009 at 02:31 PM
"i'm amazed everyday eddy's arm is still attached."
The punchline is they still prefer him over signing Gagne.
"Guardado was about the only bright spot out of the Ranger's bullpen last year."
For a guy who was average as a reliever, that's a sad statement about the rest of the pen.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | February 02, 2009 at 02:33 PM
I'm glad Mark Hamburger's name hasn't been forgotten, kinsler5, because he is still far away, but still a legitimate prospect.
Although I'd prefer the Rangers sign no conventional relievers, and go with a 5-long-man "relief rotation" this year, in hopes of figuring out whom to keep for our 2010 starting rotation, I think they want EG for his ability to mentor and humor the youth. They loved having him as a teammate.
Posted by: michael gleason | February 02, 2009 at 02:48 PM
Yeah, he gave up 5 runs in his time in Minn, 3 of which were in 2/3 of an inning. That is the problem with bullpen arms, small sample size, which you make even smaller by just looking at his Minn data.
What it looks like if you look at his game by game data at fangraphs is that his last 10 games or so he was out of gas. All of his peripheral numbers took a jump about that time, and that was before he became a Twin. Lets not forget that he just came back from TJ late the yer before. He had pitched a total of 24 innings the year before and a total of 55 2/3 since 2006 before joining the Rangers pen in 2008.
Tailing off severely at the end is not a real major surprise. There is a reason why the Twins gave up a long away bullpen prospect for him.
He still had a 4.15 ERA, 3.90 FIP and a 1.22 WHIP. Good cheap signing that allows Texas to let Gabbard to become a LOOGY in the AAA bullpen instead of the MLB pen. If Guardado craters, cut him and just promote Gabbard.
I have a hard time finding any real fault in this one, as long as it is a relatively cheap deal.
Posted by: laxtonto | February 02, 2009 at 03:15 PM
The Rangers aren't interested in Kris Benson.
The only reason they went to his pitching session was to see if Anna was there.
Posted by: mtex | February 02, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Mark Hamburger isn't really a prospect unless you call everyone playing minor league baseball a "prospect". The Twins sent him the the Rangers because they believe his ceiling is AA; they were never going to send a legitimate prospect in exchange for Guardado.
Posted by: bernie | February 02, 2009 at 04:00 PM
Guardado did good out of the bullpen for them in 08. Smart move to bring him back.
Posted by: 123456789 | February 02, 2009 at 04:00 PM
It looks like Texas has more faith in Hamburger than the Twins did, considering they automatically moved him up a level and installed him as the closer for their A ball team in Clinton where he had 3 saves in 4 games before the end of the season. To combine his numbers from the 2 levels would put him 16 of 17 in save appearances in 2008.
I am not going to say he is the next all star closer, but from what it sounds like he will move up into A+ with a chance at AA this year. Not a great prospect, and will probably not make the Rangers top 40, but he is a legit prospect, not organizational fodder. It is hard to label a guy that throws in the mid-90's and a decent slider on a large projectable frame a "non prospect".
Hell the last Ask BA had the 30th guy in the Ranger's organization at 7th in the Astros, so not making the top 40 or 50 in Texas in not a huge slight.
Hamburger was most likely picked because Texas had a list of guys they considered to have enough value to take a flyer on in the low levels and they needed a guy to close for A Clinton for the minor league playoffs.
Posted by: laxtonto | February 02, 2009 at 04:27 PM
Not abad trade, I'd say, for surrendering only Eddies last 3 (tired) months.
This time he wants a no-trade clause, but the purpose of signing him is different: last time was to resurrect and flip him, to boost the farm; this time it's to mentor the guys called up from the farm, so a no-trade clause wouldn't matter. Even if he pitches less toward the end of the season, he could help young guys who are experiencing the same tiredness.
Posted by: michael gleason | February 02, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Yeah, I don't think they're going to try to flip him. They saw last season that he has very little value on the trade deadline market - and he's a year older now. He's a junkballer who gets by with smarts & experience more than any great stuff. But they need a second lefty, and he could probably get by serving as closer if he just had to - so I think it's not a bad signing. Wish they would have gotten Springer. Oakland is going to be a lot better this season.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | February 03, 2009 at 09:05 AM
kinsler5 is a failure.
The deal is only 3 mil. if he meets the incentives. If he doesn't perform, they cut bait and lose very little. Low risk move to get a popular guy in the clubhouse. I don't see the problem with it.
Posted by: maximilian | February 03, 2009 at 04:06 PM
Jeez kinsler5
Argument for the sake of argument. You knew full well that the deal includes incentives to reach 3 million. Think before you type.
You also know full well that if he reaches all those incentives, he's well worth the 3 million.
Posted by: mtex | February 03, 2009 at 04:21 PM
Its no coup or great signing, but its a fine pickup.
Complaining about a minor league contract with incentives for a reliever who was good for them last year? Jesus...
Why didn't you ever respond to me in the byrd home/away splits thread?
Posted by: damian | February 03, 2009 at 04:54 PM
Eddie was a huge clubhouse favorite and mentor to a whole lot of the young pitchers on the staff. EXP C.J Wilson. Good pickup. More than likely he will pitch great, and we will trade him mid season for more prospects (we've done it with relievers the last 2 years). You need a good guy like that in the club house anyways. NOW BRING IN SHEETS!
Posted by: Rett Davis | February 03, 2009 at 06:04 PM