![]() |
|
|
| |
« Astros Looking To Acquire Third Baseman? | Main | Marlins Renew Three »
6:24pm: According to Brian Costa of the Newark Star-Ledger, Mets manager Jerry Manuel stopped just short of naming Hernandez his fifth starter on Wednesday.
"I tell you what, he was pretty good today," Manuel said. "He has a good presence about him on the mound, in the dugout, teammates seem to really - it's like he brings a little bit different energy for us. So I would have to say that he's put himself in a real good position."
2:53pm: The New York Post's Bart Hubbuch writes that "it's probably safe to say Freddy Garcia won't be long for Mets' camp."
It's just speculation at this point without word from manager Jerry Manuel or GM Omar Minaya, but it's pretty clear that the Mets have better rotation options. Garcia gave up four runs on four hits in just one inning Wednesday against the Braves and is still, as Hubbuch writes, "throwing what amounts to batting practice with his surgically repaired right shoulder."
Livan Hernandez and Jon Niese are both enjoying decent spring campaigns, and Tim Redding's contract should eventually land him a spot on the squad. Dumping Garcia would save the Mets around $8.5MM in potential incenctives.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I would say today's performance may have sealed that deal. A 16.71 ERA won't win you a starting spot most of the time.
Posted by: Brad426 | March 18, 2009 at 02:57 PM
Pretty much! He got hit hard today by the Braves minor leaguers.
Posted by: Jay212033 | March 18, 2009 at 03:18 PM
No way Garcia is ready to start the season. Don't know if he'll eer get back to what he was.
To be fair though on those 'Braves minor leaguers', I think that starter was their top prospect. I can see why.
Posted by: Suse | March 18, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Yawn. Should have never signed this guy in the first place. But yes, he is/was a better choice then Pedro (rolls eyes)
Posted by: nrmax88 | March 18, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Bring him back to Detroit let him play in triple A and prove himself. Might be a little bias I got Mud Hens season tickets.
Posted by: LiveFastCyYoung | March 18, 2009 at 03:27 PM
I'll tell you what, we'll keep Kendrick if you keep Garcia, OK?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | March 18, 2009 at 03:45 PM
nrmax88:
Pedro Martinez 2008:
5.61 ERA, 1.57 WHIP
19 HRs in 107 innings
87/44 K/BB ratio
Pedro is garbage, get over it.
Oh, and Freddy Garcia was on a MINOR LEAGUE deal, so why should we have never signed him?
Posted by: Hyro | March 18, 2009 at 03:45 PM
Pedro Martinez 2008: Coming off a shoulder surgery, trying to recover from pulled hammy in first game, dealing with his dying father back home. Don't be mad cuz your man crush Freddie Garcia sucks. We will see if Pedro is garbage when he catches on somewhere.
Posted by: nrmax88 | March 18, 2009 at 04:01 PM
My mancrush Freddy Garcia? Um, no. I was merely saying that there was no risk of any kind in signing him. Pedro, on the other hand, wants a guaranteed deal which is ridiculous.
Pedro Martinez : Incredibly injury prone, was terrible even before his father died, has nothing left, gets mauled by any decent lineup.
Pedro Martinez now is NOT the Pedro of '05 or even '07, and he will never come close again
Posted by: Hyro | March 18, 2009 at 04:11 PM
Pedro has nothing left? He isn't the same Pedro of 05? Then how come his fastball velocity is the same as it was in 2005? So what if Pedro is injury prone? He gets mauled by any decent lineup? You cannot validate any of this outside of 2008, which was a horrible year, no doubt, but it can be explained. Other then 2008, you have zero basis for any of your claims.
Posted by: nrmax88 | March 18, 2009 at 04:16 PM
There was like a dozen teams scouting Garcia last summer at his workout looking at him before the Tigers signed him and this winter when he signed I imagine most MLB executives would have taken a chance on Garcia once again over martinez, solely on health/stuff issues.
It was a crapshoot and so far, it looks like Garcia gamble has not paid off, but it was just a long shot like rehab projects are and they are always longshots, just like martinez is, you never know when will hit the big one with those guys.
Case in point. Bartolo Colon last year was hitting 94-95mph for 3-4 starts, then gets hit with a line drive in a game, stays in the game and all of a sudden is throwing in the upper 80's from then on. he never starts another game again the entire season and is now a rehab project for the Chisox.
Posted by: johns | March 18, 2009 at 05:13 PM
you had to think going into this that the chances were Garcia would stink it up or they would not have signed Hernandez. Hernandez will be the 5th starter; he will eat up innings and give the bullpen a rest after the back to back long days they will have when Maine/Perez go 4 1/3 or 5 innings. Just say no to pedro.
Posted by: big jay | March 18, 2009 at 05:56 PM
"
you had to think going into this that the chances were Garcia would stink it up or they would not have signed Hernandez. Hernandez will be the 5th starter; he will eat up innings and give the bullpen a rest after the back to back long days they will have when Maine/Perez go 4 1/3 or 5 innings. Just say no to pedro.
"
So, the presence of another starter who absolutely blows should be a reason not to sign Pedro.
So glad you're not an MLB GM.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 18, 2009 at 06:02 PM
"
you had to think going into this that the chances were Garcia would stink it up or they would not have signed Hernandez. Hernandez will be the 5th starter; he will eat up innings and give the bullpen a rest after the back to back long days they will have when Maine/Perez go 4 1/3 or 5 innings. Just say no to pedro.
"
So, the presence of another starter who absolutely blows should be a reason not to sign Pedro.
So glad you're not an MLB GM.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 18, 2009 at 06:02 PM
"
you had to think going into this that the chances were Garcia would stink it up or they would not have signed Hernandez. Hernandez will be the 5th starter; he will eat up innings and give the bullpen a rest after the back to back long days they will have when Maine/Perez go 4 1/3 or 5 innings. Just say no to pedro.
"
So, the presence of another starter who absolutely blows should be a reason not to sign Pedro.
So glad you're not an MLB GM.
Posted by: melonis rex | March 18, 2009 at 06:03 PM
good thing im not, i would have not tried to scrape up all these garbage players and signed someone like i dunno derek lowe
Posted by: big jay | March 18, 2009 at 06:07 PM
This is no big deal, whoever wins this spot is just going to keep it warm until neise wins the job in july. In which he will go 8-1 with a 1.65 ERA the rest of the way to pitch the mets into the playoffs.
Posted by: johan=cy | March 18, 2009 at 06:08 PM
This is no big deal, whoever wins this spot is just going to keep it warm until neise wins the job in july. In which he will go 8-1 with a 1.65 ERA the rest of the way to pitch the mets into the playoffs.
Posted by: johan=cy | March 18, 2009 at 06:08 PM
yeah youll have niese go 8-1 and junior spivey will hit .350 with 30hr
Posted by: big jay | March 18, 2009 at 06:11 PM
"In which he will go 8-1 with a 1.65 ERA the rest of the way to pitch the mets into the playoffs."
Because for the last 2 years everything has gone right for the Mets at the end of the season.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 18, 2009 at 06:59 PM
Garcia's stuff has looked pretty fringe this Spring - his FB has been clocked at around 85. He's going to have to get back to 90 - 92 to succeed.
Pedro is would def. make a better 5th starter than the other options - needless to say, he has a lot more upside than Livan, Garcia and Redding.
Posted by: Chris W. | March 18, 2009 at 07:03 PM
"Pedro is would def. make a better 5th starter than the other options - needless to say, he has a lot more upside than Livan, Garcia and Redding."
Not anymore.
I know people have these delusional fantasies where he's not pitching on a surgically repaired rotator cuff but the reality is that he's pitched about 140 innings since the surgery and has a WHIP of about 1.55 in that span and usually can't go more then 5 innings without completely exhausting his pitch count. He's not the pitcher he once was and the sooner that people accept that, the better.
Difference is, unlike Livan or Garcia, Pedro still thinks he's above taking a minor league deal with incentives and that he can still ring in the big cash guaranteed.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | March 18, 2009 at 07:16 PM
Well anyone coming immediately off of surgery sees a drop in ability, usually it gets better over time. At least one could make that argument. Still, I'd rather gamble on Pedro than Livan Hernandez. I think the Twins would have agreed.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 18, 2009 at 07:23 PM
johan=cy=delusional.
8-1 with a 1.65 ERA?
exactly what in his last year or spring has told you that? That's like me saying Adam Eaton's coming back to the Phils and will pitch two no hitters. haha.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | March 18, 2009 at 07:24 PM
I'll tell you what... instead of getting creative and signing a no-upside Tim Redding for over $2 million and an absolutely finished pitcher like Freddy Garcia to an almost hilarious incentive-laden deal, the Mets could've brought Pedro Martinez back at a reasonable rate AND signed Livan Hernandez to his current deal for possible 6th starter duty, all while allowing Jon Niese to develop in AAA.
Well guess what? There's still an opportunity of this happening, since Redding came into camp out of shape and now looks like he's back to the '05 Tim Redding, while Garcia has a spring training ERA somewhere in the 13's. Stop the crap, and stop being nieve, Mets front office, and get Pedro signed already!
I looked at this year's team in an optimistic manner, thinking that the Mets would finally have some starting pitching depth after years of AAAA starters and retreads pitching important games for us, but this does not look like it will come to fruition. Ugh...
Posted by: MattyMets | March 18, 2009 at 07:48 PM
You just knew Livan would sneak his way into a rotation somehow, it has to happen.
Posted by: bigpat | March 18, 2009 at 08:39 PM
"...the reality is that he's pitched about 140 innings since the surgery and has a WHIP of about 1.55 in that span and usually can't go more then 5 innings without completely exhausting his pitch count."
Still sounds better than the alternatives to me (see: Hernandez's 69 ERA+ in 2008 and Garcia's lame duck fastball). I suppose Tim Redding is decent candidate, despite his sore shoulder and reported extra weight.
Posted by: Chris W. | March 18, 2009 at 09:33 PM
"Pedro has nothing left? He isn't the same Pedro of 05? Then how come his fastball velocity is the same as it was in 2005? So what if Pedro is injury prone? He gets mauled by any decent lineup? You cannot validate any of this outside of 2008, which was a horrible year, no doubt, but it can be explained. Other then 2008, you have zero basis for any of your claims."
nrmax, get over Pedro. Yeah, his fastball had velocity. So does Kyle Farnsworth's. How's that working out for him?
Remember, Pedro faced THE NETHERLANDS! Their hitters would be lucky to make a AAA bench.
I don't care about these excuses. Bottom line is he was injured AGAIN in 2008 and was god awful. His ERA was good in 2007 but that was it. His WHIP was horrible and he was incredibly lucky he didn't get hit as hard as he could have.
Get over Pedro, the man is done.
Posted by: icedrake523 | March 18, 2009 at 10:31 PM
"Still sounds better than the alternatives to me (see: Hernandez's 69 ERA+ in 2008 and Garcia's lame duck fastball). I suppose Tim Redding is decent candidate, despite his sore shoulder and reported extra weight."
Livan Hernandez can pitch 200+ innings and give you what Pedro will.
Livan stunk in 2008 but look at where he played. The AL (first time ever) in Minnesota (astroturf bad for a groundball pitcher like him) and Colorado (a launching pad even with the humidor). Before last year he didn't have an ERA over 4 since 2001. I'd take my chances with Livan, even after his bad year last year, over Pedro.
Posted by: icedrake523 | March 18, 2009 at 10:37 PM
Still sounds better than the alternatives to me (see: Hernandez's 69 ERA+ in 2008 and Garcia's lame duck fastball). I suppose Tim Redding is decent candidate, despite his sore shoulder and reported extra weight.
Posted by: Chris W. | March 18, 2009 at 09:33 PM
This the same guy who couldn't retire a college lineup?
He gets 2.25 mil (Double it and you almost get Abreu) for his career 5 ERA and he shows up overweight even while knowing his spot wasn't secure. Pathetic.
Can't say Livan's much better either.
I'm also tired of people mentioning innings eater or workhorse. What's the point of having one guy pitch when he's gonna throw up a 5+ERA? A workhorse is an innings eater than can post a decent ERA. Therefore, there is no reason for Livan's 200 IP. He throws like an 80 mph fastball. I don't care what the spring numbers against AA lineups may be. The guy stinks and has no upside.
Trade for a viable starter or resign Pedro. If not, bring up some minor leaguers that will probably throw up the same numbers Livan would. (5+ERA) Except they get experience and might breakout.
With the Mets and their payroll, they shouldn't be using a guy like Livan, Redding or Garcia.
Posted by: strikethree | March 18, 2009 at 11:17 PM
"This is no big deal, whoever wins this spot is just going to keep it warm until neise wins the job in july. In which he will go 8-1 with a 1.65 ERA the rest of the way to pitch the mets into the playoffs."
You know things are going to get interesting when Mets fans try to make sense out of failure.
It IS a big deal when Pelfrey is hurting himself, Johan ended last season with injury and started this season with concern, and the rest of your rotation consists of sloppy seconds from the Orioles and a cross-eyed guy who fairy hops the foul line in his way to the party dugout.
Posted by: Russell | March 18, 2009 at 11:25 PM
"It IS a big deal when Pelfrey is hurting himself"
When has he done this?
"Johan ended last season with injury and started this season with concern"
The injury concern was almost 2 weeks ago. He's feeling fine and looking good so far.
"and the rest of your rotation consists of sloppy seconds from the Orioles"
Yeah, I'm sure the Orioles are glad they got rid of Maine...
"a cross-eyed guy who fairy hops the foul line in his way to the party dugout."
......What?
Posted by: icedrake523 | March 19, 2009 at 12:46 AM
LIvan's FIP numbers were not that bad in 2008. It's within reason that Livan could give the Mets 180 IP of sub-5.00 ERA ball and keep them in a lot of games. He's looking like by far the best option for the #5 slot.
Posted by: JK47 | March 19, 2009 at 02:53 AM
Pelfrey - "Mike Pelfrey is reported to be experiencing some pain in his lower left leg. He had an MRI on the leg and is expected to miss at least a few days of work outs. Pelfrey is the latest Met to be experiencing some minor pain this spring."
Santana - you aren't worried that the ace of your staff, the glue of the team, the guy who, if he got injured your entire team would collapse, had leg problems at the end of last season and then was being sent for MRI's early on? Naive?
Maine - his career innings pitched over the past 3 seasons with the Mets: 90, 191, 140. And no, I don't think the Orioles are kicking and screaming. Maine only has any success because he is playing in the NL.
Oliver Perez - thats just an evolving storyline lol
Posted by: Russell | March 19, 2009 at 07:36 AM
Russell is just a Yankee troll. Apparently, he just loves to rag on the Mets, and he's been doing it for months now.
''I don't care about these excuses. Bottom line is he was injured AGAIN in 2008 and was god awful. His ERA was good in 2007 but that was it. His WHIP was horrible and he was incredibly lucky he didn't get hit as hard as he could have.
Get over Pedro, the man is done.''
I have to disagree with you on this. Pedro had a few September starts in '07 after massive rotator cuff surgery in his mid 30's and actually pitched fairly well in those starts in limited work.
2008 was a disaster for him. As many experts asserted when his hamstring injury occurred, hamstring injuries could linger for an entire season, even after it heals. Aside from the shoulder surgery, which likely did have lingering effects but probably was not the cause of his problems last year, think about a pitcher with excellent mechanics and how a hamstring injury could affect it. That, combined with the personal problems and traveling back and forth to the Dominican Republic to be with his father, and you could see why this guy had such a crappy '08. This is a Hall of Fame talent - not some decent pitcher that faded away in his mid 30's.
Of course this is contingent on his health, but I think the guy is healthy and ready to pitch this year. I still don't buy this argument that Pedro is finished, but we shall see.
I like what Livan Hernandez has shown so far, and he could be a good innings eater if he is healthy and in shape (which is most important here), but I can't really bank on this happening.
Posted by: MattyMets | March 19, 2009 at 08:17 AM
'Sweaty Freddy' will hook on trying to make another team or lay poolside smoking.
Posted by: studio179 | March 19, 2009 at 08:28 AM
Matty - don't choke on that pickle.
Posted by: Russell | March 19, 2009 at 08:46 AM
"I like what Livan Hernandez has shown so far, and he could be a good innings eater if he is healthy and in shape (which is most important here), but I can't really bank on this happening."
Your innings will be eaten at a clip to:
2006 - 4.83 ERA
2007 - 4.93 ERA
2008 - 6.05 ERA
In the NL to say the least!
I can eat innings for the Mets if they want.
Posted by: Russell | March 19, 2009 at 08:50 AM
Intelligent response. It goes in tune with your usual sentiment of ''Mets suck and their entire rotation is going to blow up'' and ''the Mets lineup is horrible, they have no hitters.''
Try some new material, or maybe just some objective insight for once.
Posted by: MattyMets | March 19, 2009 at 08:51 AM
Intelligent response. It goes in tune with your usual sentiment of ''Mets suck and their entire rotation is going to blow up'' and ''the Mets lineup is horrible, they have no hitters.''
Try some new material, or maybe just some objective insight for once.
Posted by: MattyMets | March 19, 2009 at 08:51 AM
"Try some new material, or maybe just some objective insight for once."
How am I supposed to not rag on the Mets? My GF was poisoned by her mom into liking the Mets as a kid and she is having a hard time getting off the kick. She has lost interest in baseball as of late because the team is unexciting. Citi Field was built with a rotunda celebrating a guy who had little to no significant history with the team. Slowly becoming a Yankee fan, it just takes time. I think she is sick of the racist ownership filling their quota of American ballplayers. Maybe it's the manager going "gangsta". Maybe it's Reyes getting into senseless fights with the MARLINS of all teams. There are reasons why teams like the Marlins line up to beat the Mets. There's a reason why the "Beat the Mets" song was invented.
I never said the rotation was going to "BLOW UP"... I said they are fragile and all I'm seeing here is that everyone's willing to ignore early signs of trouble and willing to settle for garbage at the end of the rotation. It just doesn't make any sense. TIM REDDING!?! WHATTTTTT? If my ace said his arm hurt early in ST and everything was dependent on him then I would be hella worried.
I'm sorry if you can't handle opinions or subjective arguments. If you don't like them then you don't have to respond. Lets go point "troll troll troll" at someone who clearly doesn't like the Mets. Thank you for stating the obvious. If MLBTradeRumors wanted this this website to be 100% statistic talk they would have put up a disclaimer.
Posted by: Russell | March 19, 2009 at 09:04 AM
So Russell, you must be concerned about CC then, seeing as how every baseball expert see's him as an enormous injury risk, he is weighing in at about 300, and he logged tons and tons of innings last year. You also must be worried about Burnett, seeing as how he gets hurt every single year, and he is now being paid 80 million dollars to pitch until he is 37. Andy Pettitte for 10 million? Ha! Wang is coming off an injury too, man, why don't you just worry about your own team instead of being obsessed with a team you don't even like. It is sad when a person who has said he is a fan of baseball spends more time rooting against other teams then he does rooting for his own team. I feel bad for you, your life must be sad. And about the GF stuff.... yeah, we are all buying that you have a girlfriend. Heh.
Posted by: nrmax88 | March 19, 2009 at 12:01 PM
Matty, what will really annoy me is in the middle of the season when Pedro has caught on somewhere, clearly is still a good pitcher, and geniuses like icedrake, hyro and adropofvenom are sitting here acting all shocked that Pedro is still a good pitcher, making stupid remarks like.... "man, who would have ever though Pedro Martinez, one of the best pitchers in the history of this game, would ever be good again after struggling the year following his rotator cuff surgery, which is pretty much protocol with any pitcher having surgery? Certainly not us? We base everything off of last year, and nothing else, we are smart NY fans!"
Posted by: nrmax88 | March 19, 2009 at 12:03 PM
"It goes in tune with your usual sentiment of ''Mets suck and their entire rotation is going to blow up'' and ''the Mets lineup is horrible, they have no hitters.'' "
How about this: While Santana is an undeniable ace, if he misses an extended period the Mets can kiss the playoffs bye bye. Pelfrey just had a breakout season, he needs a duplicate before we can call him your solid #2, add to that you should see how he handles 200 innings this time around, last September his numbers dropped around the board. Perez is feast or famine. People constantly rag on Tim Wakefield for this yet he put up similar numbers, even better in most cases than Perez did last year. Maine shows signs of great brilliance at stretches and follows them up with stretches of great despair. As or Livan Hernandez... answer this honestly, last year did Mets fans actually want him on their staff. The AL Central last year was a weak division. Add to that a rookie with 14 major league innings.
Long and the short of it is this: This staff isn't very deep or for that matter stable. Most great pitching staffs can lose their ace for a month and still scrape by. With the Mets I don't see that. Lose Santana, lose the playoffs shot. But even with Santana, a better 8th/9th inning combo, and what is still an above average offense... it's an uphill battle. Phillies are a better overall team, Braves have a pitching staff that could be dangerous, Marlins are always that pesky threat, and believe it or not the Nats are a tougher team (though still a last place team).
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 19, 2009 at 01:13 PM
nrmax88, you sure have been going out on a limb lately pumping up on Martinez. Certainly it is possible that he could come back and be effective for a few games, maybe even 1/2, or even a whole season, but he is just another rehabbing, injury prone pitcher along the lines of Colon, Wade Miller, Garcia. Those guys have had serious arm trouble for years and never made it back for prolonged periods, much like Martinez. Not sure if there are any that have had 3 injury riddled seasons and then made it back and turned it around, but maybe he can, just think that most GM's are going against it unless he seriously reconsiders his inflated salary demands.
Posted by: johns | March 19, 2009 at 01:34 PM
Kenny Williams continues to impress me. There was earlier talk that the WS wanted to bring Freddy back, but KW and Don Copper must have seem something. I'm not sure Cooper gets the credit he deserves.
Posted by: CubCrazy | March 19, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Start Wearing Purple, Russell just admitted that he has a personal hatred of the Mets, which would make his constant posts against them valid. It has nothing to do with their rotation - it has to do with the fact that it is the Mets' rotation. I was purely stressing that point, nothing more about the Mets rotation. So how about that?
Also remind yourself that, while people are starting to knock this rotation, these 4 starters were the 4 main starters on a team that won 88 games last year, with a disaster of a bullpen, Johan Santana getting screwed out of wins with his 2.53 ERA, John Maine pitching with a bone spur the size of a tree trunk, Oliver Perez being erratic as usual, and Mike Pelfrey having an excellent second half. There is no reason that this staff can't be just as good, if not better, if injury doesn't strike.
Posted by: MattyMets | March 19, 2009 at 01:45 PM
I was simply stating this is a rotation that's hinging on a wing and a prayer. A lot has to go right... more so than usually expected in baseball.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 19, 2009 at 03:02 PM