MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Brewers Not Talking Trades | Main | Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Bucs, Jays, Pedro, Pudge, Phils, Twins »

Odds And Ends: Tejada, Manny, White Sox

 A few links for Thursday night...

  • Good news for the Astros: The AP (via ESPN) reports that a federal prosecutor recommended that Miguel Tejada get probation, but no prison time for his involvement with PEDs.
  • MLB.com's Ken Gurnick passes along a memorable Manny Ramirez quote: "No more cricket. I'm not signing to play cricket. Well, I can be a free agent after this year, so we'll see. But don't ask me about cricket."
  • Scot Gregor of the Daily Herald writes that the White Sox need to make a deal for a center fielder who can bat leadoff. He thinks GM Kenny Williams is "probably close" to making a deal. Gregor doesn't like Jim Edmonds or Juan Pierre for the job, but he doesn't rule out Kenny Lofton.
  • This isn't a rumor, but MLB.com's Mark Sheldon has a quirky anecdote. Micah Owings and Norris Hopper hit home runs with the same bat today. I might be more surprised that Hopper hit one.
  • Ivan Rodriguez is looking forward to joining the Astros, according to this article in the Detroit Free Press.
  • Padres CEO Sandy Alderson says it was a huge mistake to let Joakim Soria slip away through the Rule 5 draft in this article by Tom Krasovic of the San Diego Union-Tribune.


Comments

Klo? HAHAHAH BRING IT!

Do the White Sox match up with the Braves at all over Josh Anderson? He's probably available since he's out of options and Schafer is around.

I like the new font.

Why wouldn't the sox have brought in Lofton at the beginning of spring training on a minor league deal to see if he can still play? Now to just sign him after not playing last year and give him the job seems a little weird.

The White Sox need a CF and/or lead-off hitter? That's not news. Probably close to a deal sounds more like wishful thinking than anything concrete.

I've thought all offseason the Sox should look at Skip Schumaker for the job. If the second base experiment doesn't work out, I still do. Great defense, strong arm, doesn't hit lefties though but Anderson would platoon OK.

Quit deleting my posts. I did not attack any of the fellow posters, nor did I violate the posting guidelines. What was said about KW was complete honest and passionate truth.

I agree 100% mateodh, I've had those exact same sentiments about Schumaker this offseason.

The White Sox have a perfectly good Center Fielder, in Brian Anderson. KW said that our lead off man would not be your usual lead off man. BA Center Field 09

"Quit deleting my posts. I did not attack any of the fellow posters, nor did I violate the posting guidelines. What was said about KW was complete honest and passionate truth."

Astral, I really, really want to know what you said about Kenny now.

I like the idea of an Anderson/Schumaker platoon.

What would the Sox have to trade to get Schumaker though?

I'd think a Broadway for Schumaker straight swap, but with Broadway the first guy up if someone gets hurt, and an injury prone Colon in the 5th spot of the rotation, not a good idea.

All I would want in return is to see Skip get to succeed in his natural role somewhere, but I'm sure Mozeliak doesn't share those sentiments. Earlier in the offseason I would have said Boone Logan, need-for-need, but now it would be Thornton and KW probably declines.

"I'd think a Broadway for Schumaker straight swap, but with Broadway the first guy up if someone gets hurt, and an injury prone Colon in the 5th spot of the rotation, not a good idea."

Dont forget about Richard and also Marquez. We have room to get rid of Lance Broadway

Broadway wouldn't be the first option to replace an injured starter. Richard or Marquez would fill in an empty spot in the rotation, and to fill in in the bullpen Egbert would be a good option to call up from AAA. Poreda may be down there as well. We are not short on pitching prospects at all.

So far, I like what I see from Owens. I know his bat is not exactly hot right now, and that is worrisome, but his running is much more natural, which is conducive to staying healthy. Also, he's taking a whole bunch of walks, more than anyone else in camp so far. This shows that he's working hard on his patience. Look at his OBP. Even with a .222 BA, he has a .333 OBP. Obviously not ideal, but if he can bring his bat around a little more, he'll be getting on base a ton. I think he's our best lead off hitter with the exception of Gets, but for whatever reason, Ozzie won't put Getz in that role. I don't think Anderson will get the full time starting nod unless he shows he can hit reliably. That hasn't happened. Wise is showing exactly how streaky he is right now. Of the three CF candidates, Owens is the only one showing real improvement in their weak area. I'm not saying Owens is great. It would be nice to have someone more established, but his defense is stronger than Wise, and his offense is more valuable than Anderson.

Later,
Aaron

"All I would want in return is to see Skip get to succeed in his natural role somewhere, but I'm sure Mozeliak doesn't share those sentiments. Earlier in the offseason I would have said Boone Logan, need-for-need, but now it would be Thornton and KW probably declines."

Posted by: mateodh | March 19, 2009 at 10:42 PM

Wow your selling Thornton way short to be compairing him to boone logan. Thornton is way too valuable right now and logan belongs in the minors.

I think that's Mat's point SM. Logan before the season started might have been someone the Cardinals would have considered. Now, they would probably want Thornton.

And Aaron, I think Anderson's defense far outweighs the pluses that would come with Owens playing center. I think Owens in the midst of getting traded, considering he's out of options and can be a fourth OF for someone.

I am liking the idea of Schumaker/Anderson platoon a lot.

I too am really likeing the idea of Anderson and Schumaker. I definatly know KW could get that done. We could offer Broadway or Owens, maybe even D-Wise.

Also previously to the article, i think that kenny lofton would be a bad idea. It would take more than a minor league contract to draw him out of retirment. He would probably want money and a spot and were not sure if he could still play after missing a year.

I disagree. I think if you were comparing Anderson to Wise, I think there would be a big enough defensive difference to say Anderson is far and away a better option. However, considering that even if Anderson does start hitting, he is another low average power hitting type of hitter that we have tons of. We need speed and on base percentage in the lineup. Anderson has no chance of offering that. Owens at least offers that possibility. If he was a defensive liability, I might see your point, but he's not. The only way I see Owens getting traded is to bring back a proven leadoff man in some sort of package trade. I find it unlikely that anyone has a place for him, given that he is out of options. I think if he doesn't make the roster, he ends up on waivers on his way down. Maybe someone will claim him, maybe not.

One thing to consider, in looking at the two options, is the field we play on. Our center field isn't exactly huge. Having a guy like Anderson, while always a plus, is not necessary in our outfield. That is why we've managed to get by the last few years since Rowand has been gone. If we played somewhere like Petco, or Comerica, I'd say defense is a must in center, but I think in a hitter's park like the Cell, balls that would require a fantastic jump to get to are headed out of the park anwyay.

Later,
Aaron

aaron, did you just say on base percentage and owens??? you are officially fired.

ba in center is a-o-tay with me. that glove is something special, and the rest of the team can carry his non-eventful offensive capabilities.

broadway for schu, i could live with that...it could offer some interesting match-ups in the central, especially if they take turns 'getting hot'.

owens definitely gets claimed if he's put on waivers...poor bastard.

I know it sounds crazy, but look at his spring numbers. He took 27 in his entire stint with the team in 2007. If he can keep that patience, and then hit even for a decent average, you're looking at good OBP. Not saying it will happen, but its possible.

Later,
Aaron

Sorry, he's walked 8 times this spring. Left that part out. 27 walks in 2007 in 389 AB's. He's taken 8 this spring in 54. Proportionally that's over 100% improvement. Given this is a small sample, but its a very good sign. We've already seen that he can hit .260-.270 over a long stretch. If you add in his apparent improved patience, he'll be exactly what we need. We'll see what happens.

Later,
Aaron

"Padres CEO Sandy Alderson says it was a huge mistake to let Joakim Soria slip away through the Rule 5 draft"

Lol, ya think???

"Padres CEO Sandy Alderson says it was a huge mistake to let Joakim Soria slip away through the Rule 5 draft"

Lol, ya think???

Manny Ramirez is a space cadet.

Jerry Owens' only asset is his speed, and he doesn't know how to use it. He is faster than Wise, but it seems Wise knows how to steal bases better, he is also a slap hitter who can't get on base enough to make it worth while. His D is horrible, and yes US Cellular isn't big, but Detroit is, I also believe at least 2 others in our division are large. Plus Owens doesn't offer enough of a difference of batting over BA to have him start. BA should be the starting CFer, and he's better than the 4 options mentioned in the article also. If he was our only option, Owens should be a 9 hitter, not a 1.

I don't understand what Ozzie has against BA but he started Uribe for how long when his bat was a liability. BA's defense in CF is better than Uribe's was at SS, so this season, he should be the Sox starter unless another option is brought in, that isn't any of the 4 mentioned in the article.

For Schumaker (sp?) if the Cardinals would have asked for Logan earlier, and now Thornton, that's a HUGE jump. If they wanted Logan first, it would more likely be asking for Wasserman or Carrasco. They should know that it would take a lot more to get Thornton.

Count me in on the Owens column.

He's getting on base, as 50+ SB speed and isn't as bad in the field as some say. His only real defensive liability is his arm.

Is someone like Pierre that much of an improvement over Owens?

Anderson is lackidasical (sp?) and can't hit MLB pitching other than an occasional 2B or homer. If we had gotten a guy like Roberts to lead off at another position, I'd grudgingly put him in the 9 spot, but we haven't. And OF defense is overrated.

I'd rather have a halfway decent table-setter at leadoff in Owens over a career .220 hitter who plays nice defense.

Also, Thornton's going nowhere, especially considering the injury concerns with Linebrink.

Owens doesn't hit that much better than Anderson, and with Quentin and Dye in the OF you need someone in CF who can make up for what they lack. If you put Owens in CF it's one of the worst defensive OF's in the league. Pierre is an upgrade to Owens but not that much, he at least can use his speed to get some slap hits, but I still wouldn't want him. Getz is the best leadoff candidate even over Owens, I don't know why he isn't tried there.

Remember, Pitching and defense wins championships, and the most important positions are up the middle, Catcher, SS, 2nd and CF.

Owens doesn't hit that much better than Anderson, and with Quentin and Dye in the OF you need someone in CF who can make up for what they lack. If you put Owens in CF it's one of the worst defensive OF's in the league. Pierre is an upgrade to Owens but not that much, he at least can use his speed to get some slap hits, but I still wouldn't want him. Getz is the best leadoff candidate even over Owens, I don't know why he isn't tried there.

Remember, Pitching and defense wins championships, and the most important positions are up the middle, Catcher, SS, 2nd and CF.

Where are you getting that Owens' defense is horrible. Obviously he's not Anderson, but he's not a liability like you seem to make him out to be. Wise is a much worse option defensively. Also, Quentin and Dye get a bad rap also. They aren't gold glovers, but they aren't horrible either. I think the assertion that with Owens we have one of the worst defensive outfields is outright uninformed. The bottom line is, Anderson is not an offensive upgrade to Owens, and while he is a defensive upgrade, its not a big enough upgrade to warrant his lack of a bat.

Later,
Aaron

I don't think Owens offensive upgrade over Anderson makes up for the difference in the defense. Either way, neither one of them should lead off for this team. if Owens is leading off, the team isn't going anywhere, maybe they aren't anyway, I don't know. They need a real leadoff hitter, but since neither one is, I'd rather have the defense.

Owens is holding his own and seems to be improving this spring. Anderson is leaving runners on base at an alarming rate. Let Owens start the game at leadoff and bring in Anderson for defense later in games.The sox don't need Schumacher or Josh Anderson, neither of them are better than what they have now.

I just heard on the radio yesterday that Ozzie was going to start looking at Anderson, Fields and Getz at leadoff. If that's the case, it doesn't sound like he likes what Owens and Wise are doing.

Someone needs to step up and take the spot...I'm warming to the idea of BA at leadoff. Everyone seems to be pitching around anyone in front of him with runners on base, so might as well make him leadoff

Owens and Anderson are doing horrible at CF right now, D-Wise would be our CF but he inst a leadoff hitter. If Getz is somehow able to lead off this season. D-Wise will be our CF.

I assume you mean batting wise that Anderson is doing horrible at CF? Not one of the 3, Anderson, Wise or Owens are leadoff hitters. The only reason Ozzie is trying to have Owens be the CFer is because he's fast. Wise is also fast, but he's been slumping lately. He's a very streaky hitter, which is problematic for the leadoff spot.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.