« Garland Hopes To Stay With Arizona |
Main
| Chipper Jones Agrees To Extension With Braves »
By Tim Dierkes [March 31, 2009 at 11:40am CST]
Links for Tuesday...
- Chat today, 2pm CST.
- Rays info from Marc Topkin of the St. Petersburg Times: they're trying to figure out a way to keep Jason Isringhausen, and they've released pitcher Chuck Tiffany (part of the Danys Baez trade in '06).
- In talking to Ramona Shelburne of the L.A. Daily News, Dodgers GM Ned Colletti explained his success reading the market this offseason. He also said, "I believe there will be some players available on July 31st that normally would never be available."
- Ken Davidoff of Newsday reminds us of past trade discussions involving Kevin Youkilis, before he was highly regarded.
- Baseball America's Jim Callis notes that the Cubs released "three of their top picks from the last six drafts this spring: outfielder Ryan Harvey, the sixth overall pick in 2003; righthander Grant Johnson, a second-rounder in 2004; and lefty Mark Pawelek, the 20th overall choice in 2005."
- According to MLB.com's T.R. Sullivan, Rangers reliever Derrick Turnbow's opt-out date is Thursday. He's talking to his agent about whether he should head to Triple A Oklahoma.
- MLB.com's Anthony Castrovince says lefty reliever Juan Lara signed a minor league deal with the Indians - "just 16 months after a car accident nearly took his life."
I'm guessing that Coletti is talking about superstars.
Guys like Halladay and Peavy are legitimate possibilities to be traded. A few years ago, the idea of trading away an ace that's under control for a while would seem ludicrous. In this economic climate, the possibility is very real.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 31, 2009 at 11:42 AM
“Baseball America's Jim Callis notes that the Cubs released "three of their top picks from the last six drafts this spring: outfielder Ryan Harvey, the sixth overall pick in 2003; righthander Grant Johnson, a second-rounder in 2004; and lefty Mark Pawelek, the 20th overall choice in 2005."
Ah yes, as if the news that Gregg would be the closer wasn’t depressing enough. Thanks for pointing this out to us as well Callis!
Posted by: SuzysMan | March 31, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Youkilis to the Royals for Beltran? I don't remember that. Bet Royals fans are now pissed off about that.
I do remember the Braves asked for him twice. Once when the Sox asked about Jones and once when they asked about Tex.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 31, 2009 at 11:49 AM
i remember when the rockies wanted to trade todd helton for youkilis, and it almost happened! im SOO glad that didnt work out...
Posted by: 04Forever | March 31, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Jason Schmid no, Jason Schmidt yes.
Anyways those 3 signings weren't really part of this offseason as what this was about
Posted by: MakinItMine | March 31, 2009 at 12:44 PM
"Isn't this the same clown who signed Andruw Jones, Juan Pierre and Jason Schmid?"
And outbid the next nearest team by an estimated 10-15 Million for Manny (as people were projecting the Giants to be in the 15MM range at best)
As well as gave Furcal a new 3 year, 30 million contract shortly before bringing in a comparable player, Orlando Hudson, on a 1 year, 3 million deal. In fact, Furcal, a 31 year old with 36 games played last year and a 2003-2007 run of an OPS+ around 100, signed one of the largest contracts of the off season; did he not?
Two potentially horrible deals (Ramirez and Furcal), one guy falling into your lap (Hudson) and a couple scrapheap signings comparable to many contracts given out by many teams around the league this off season. Well, it doesn’t say “reading the market” that great at all. But I guess people anticipated him doing a lot worse, so maybe he should be proud of himself for not blowing it completely.
Posted by: SuzysMan | March 31, 2009 at 01:01 PM
I can't be too impressed with his great job cutting payroll. He managed to let one of the best pitchers on his staff walk, and then agreed to pay andruw everything they owed him over the next few seasons. So instead of getting rid of that albatross contract before he has to lock up all his young talent, he just takes away potential spending money later on. I actually thought he had one of the less productive offseason's of any gm.
Posted by: SkiBolton | March 31, 2009 at 01:19 PM
"i remember when the rockies wanted to trade todd helton for youkilis, and it almost happened! im SOO glad that didnt work out..."
With MDC as the throw in! Talk about an over rated Helton..
Posted by: johns | March 31, 2009 at 03:23 PM
"With MDC as the throw in! Talk about an over rated Helton.."
Actually, for a while there, Helton was actually THAT good.
I'd argue its more that nobody ever thought that Youkilis would develop the power that's made him more than just a high OBP hitter. He's a full on middle of the order threat now, and he really wasn't projected to be that kind of player.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 31, 2009 at 04:22 PM
'Isn't this the same clown who signed Andruw Jones, Juan Pierre and Jason Schmid?'
Those deals were done by mccourt, not Ned. Ned had to take the blame for them. but mccourt made him do those deals. It was reported by the LA Times a few months ago.
'And outbid the next nearest team by an estimated 10-15 Million for Manny (as people were projecting the Giants to be in the 15MM range at best)
As well as gave Furcal a new 3 year, 30 million contract shortly before bringing in a comparable player, Orlando Hudson, on a 1 year, 3 million deal. In fact, Furcal, a 31 year old with 36 games played last year and a 2003-2007 run of an OPS+ around 100, signed one of the largest contracts of the off season; did he not?
Two potentially horrible deals (Ramirez and Furcal), one guy falling into your lap (Hudson) and a couple scrapheap signings comparable to many contracts given out by many teams around the league this off season. Well, it doesn’t say “reading the market” that great at all. But I guess people anticipated him doing a lot worse, so maybe he should be proud of himself for not blowing it completely.'
You see, when a team has 14 FAs, then teams have to make tough decisions. The Braves grosely overpaid for Lowe, who is not an ace, but a #2. Do you want to play a 36-40yr old #2 15m per? and what did the dodgers win with Lowe that they didnt win with Manny and Furcal? Lowe was not helping them at 15m per and that money was better spent on 2B and SS. the dodgers were very smart on the furcal negotiations. they stood at 2 yrs until furcal proved he'd get 3 yrs at 10m. if he did not resign, we would have Berroa at SS at opening day. do you want that? i dont.
You know that Manny was the key of last yr and they did exactly what they needed to against Boras. they gave a deal in November, one that Boras laughed at. they waited and not only did they accept that deal, but it is deffered, so they would be able to make a midseason trade.
Damn, what did your team do? i bet they werent able to sign a 3B, 2B, SS, #4 pitcher, LF(HOFer), 3 relievers, backup catcher, and get rid of a $21m mistake, while only paying him 5m this yr. thats 9 FAs and a bad contract fixed with the payroll down 28m and under 100m. so read ALL the facts before ripping the dodgers.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | March 31, 2009 at 06:34 PM
Only an idiot would defend colletii, I rather have lowe right now, rather than any of our pitchers, and I do rembrmber lowe being great down the stretch, we got into the playoff cuz of manny and lowe, not just manny!
Posted by: KingMayan! | March 31, 2009 at 10:05 PM
King, Im not saying Lowe was horrible for us, maybe i didnt word it correctly. Part of the reason Lowe was brought in was because of playoff experience. however, he struggled twice against philly. meanwhile, manny kept hitting. With the growth of Billz, Kershaw, Mcdonald, and the vets Kuroda and Wolf helping the young guys, i think we can sustain a loss of Lowe. If the kids dont work, Colleti is saying that the dodgers will be players in the trade deadline, and big ones by saying that they realize they have to give up talent to get talent(ie, an ace). Meanwhile, we could have one of the strongest lineups in the NL.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | March 31, 2009 at 11:17 PM
lakersdodgersyankees4life,
the conversation was ‘reading the market’. If being able to read the market in advance is overspending the next team by 10-15 million on one player and spending 3/30 on another when comparables (or at least alternatives) were going in the 1 year, 5MM or less range. Well, it’s just not a horn I think the guys should be tooting. And Furcal signed early; there were plenty of options left to be had if he did walk. So Berroa would not have been the starter had he signed with another club.
Did Colletti need to sign a bunch of players? Yes, and he did just that. It doesn’t mean all of his signings were good in comparison to the market though – they weren’t. And he made two that stick out like sore thumbs as being horrible in relation to the market over the off season. He got his guys, so maybe he should brag about that. But he shouldn’t be trying to pass it off like he was a financial wizard. Even Blake is probably making more than he could have gotten elsewhere since there wasn’t a ton of competition, and I don’t buy Wolf being a bargain at 5Mil because I don’t think he is worth even that. Hudson is the only real feather I would give him for his cap with regards to what is he bragging about.
Posted by: SuzysMan | April 01, 2009 at 01:16 AM
McCourt MADE him sign those guys? Oh please. There's actual evidence that McCourt pulled the trigger on the Manny trade and re-signing, but Colletti was the very one jerking off to the prospect of having Pierre's "gamerness" and "grittytude" on the Dodgers.
Posted by: kensai | April 01, 2009 at 06:05 AM
Colletti had a terrible off season last year but a very good one this year. Furcal had a deal in hand from the Bravos and the Dodgers just matched it. They got Manny for what they offered back in November at deferred dollars no less. Lowe was heading toward the East to either the Braves, BoSox or Mets...he wanted out of the West Coast so you can't hang that on Colletti. He had a very solid off season and only someone not paying attention or a Giant fan would argue that. Do they need more pitching? Yes...who doesn't that didn't spend 1/2 billion dollars this offseason?
Posted by: Sdecee | April 01, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Sdecee,
Again, solid enough off-season versus "reading the market". Did he hold a club together despite needing to fill many holes? Yes. Did he read the market to take advantage of low salaries and bargain players? Nope, not in the least. (well, only on Hudson at the end) No one is saying he had a bad offseason - I am saying he didnt do what he is bragging about. He overspent for the production he signed this off-season, by a ton when you factor the huge amount Manny and Furcal got compared to other options at the positions. that cant be denied.
Posted by: SuzysMan | April 01, 2009 at 01:17 PM