![]() |
|
|
| |
« Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Mulder, Pedro, Cabrera, Holliday | Main | Indians Willing To Trade Cliff Lee? »
FRIDAY: Kevin Kernan of the New York Post asked Holliday specifically about playing for the Yankees. He said:
"I think a little bit as a human being you can't help but to think that if the Yankees are interested I would definitely consider it. I wouldn't be looking around if I were under contract for the four years, but I think I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't be interested, especially with the Yankees being such a storied franchise. So yeah, you take a look around; you never know what's going to happen. This is a beautiful place."
WEDNESDAY: Not a big surprise, but Newsday's Ken Davidoff learned that Matt Holliday is willing to play in New York. The Mets or Yankees could consider the Scott Boras client, who is a free agent after the season. For what it's worth, Holliday's father Tom told Tyler Kepner of the New York Times in November that he'd like to see Holliday traded to the Yankees, or at least an East Coast team.
What's your prediction for Holliday's next contract? Will he top the four year, $82MM extension offered by the Rockies? And will the A's trade him in July?
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Let's see if he can hit in the AL/non-Coors field surroundings first...
Posted by: tehasguard | April 22, 2009 at 01:15 PM
He is hitting .265 with zero homeruns. I can't see him on the Yankees. Yanks have Swisher in RF, three CFers in Jackson, Gardner, and Melky, and the LF spot will prob go to someone with a little more power.
Posted by: Russell | April 22, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Here come all the Yankee fans putting out their ridiculous trade ideas before the deadline
Posted by: H-Town-Baller | April 22, 2009 at 01:17 PM
Will he get $82M offer this offseason? Probably not. The market is way down, and the economy probably will not significantly improve before the start of the 2010 season. Also, his numbers will likely be way down in 2009, going from Denver, one of the best hitters' parks in baseball, to Oakland, one of the worst.
A's trade him before the deadline? If they are no longer in contention, then probably yes.
Posted by: Xbalanque | April 22, 2009 at 01:17 PM
I'd like to continue seeing him as an A and open this thought process in July if the A's are out of it.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | April 22, 2009 at 01:19 PM
"Here come all the Yankee fans putting out their ridiculous trade ideas before the deadline"
Yankees are going to have to give up half there system to get him, because they have only like 2 or 3 good prospects that I have seen.
Posted by: BravesRed | April 22, 2009 at 01:20 PM
"Here come all the Yankee fans putting out their ridiculous trade ideas before the deadline"
Yankees are going to have to give up half there system to get him, because they have only like 2 or 3 good prospects that I have seen.
Posted by: BravesRed | April 22, 2009 at 01:20 PM
Here is a no surprise answer, Tim. If the A's are in contention, Holliday stays and the A's get a 1st round draft pick from the team that signs him in the offseason. If they are out of contention, I am not sure how easy it will be for them to trade him. It might take a third team to get the deal done.
Do you have any ideas on what teams have what it takes to get Holliday?
Posted by: BKuGotIt | April 22, 2009 at 01:23 PM
"The market is way down, and the economy probably will not significantly improve before the start of the 2010 season."
Except it's been well documented that the best players get paid. CC, Tex, Burnett, Manny. They all got their money. It's the middle of the road/roster filler guys who suffer.
Now...if Holliday has a down year playing Oakland, that changes the game. But if he posts similar numbers to what he put up in Coors, he'll get 4-5 years, and I'll take a guess at $16-18M per. When you consider that potentially the Red Sox, Yankees, Mets and Dodgers could all have a LF vacancy next year, I have a feeling he'll get his money (provided he doesn't completely flop in OAK).
Posted by: Papelboner | April 22, 2009 at 01:26 PM
I think the Sox will chase Bay. My guess is Mets.
Posted by: Russell | April 22, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Matt Holliday will be a Yankee. He probably won't be in July, but they'll get him in the offseason.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | April 22, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Mets should sign Matt Holliday to play in left. I love Daniel Murphy, but he is not a left fielder.
Posted by: Baseball4ever | April 22, 2009 at 01:52 PM
screw holliday, how abut he starts hitting before he dreams about his next team. he hasnt hit a HR all spring and over 100 seasons ab's. A's didnt give up much in the deal but expectations were for him to help this lineup thus far not much
Posted by: arly2380 | April 22, 2009 at 01:52 PM
I think ceiling is 5/90 even with a bidding war. There will be bargains available and even IF the market were showing 20/mil/annual(+) potential, then why not just take 2 years of superior bat Manny rather than 5 or 6 years to Holliday.
Posted by: earthytones316 | April 22, 2009 at 01:58 PM
As you said Tim, this is not a surprise, especially considering that Boras is his agent. Whether or not he really wants to play in New York, he has to say this in order to drive up his price.
But I agree that he should shut up and play and worry about his next contract after the year is over.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | April 22, 2009 at 02:07 PM
I think the Sox will chase Bay. My guess is Mets.
Posted by: Russell | April 22, 2009 at 01:40 PM
I would be shocked if Jason Bay hit free agency. He's basically the definition of what the Sox look for in a player, on and off the field. I'd be willing to bet they have a long term deal for him by the all star break.
Posted by: Dr. Van Nostrand | April 22, 2009 at 02:08 PM
I'd guess 6 years/ $115 mil.
NYY new stadium makes Coors look tame.
Posted by: XD23 | April 22, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Never doubt Boras, but everything rests on Holliday's own shoulders.
If he puts up solid numbers (not Coors Field numbers, but solid) he will get the big contract but if he struggles I can see him settling for a smaller contract.
Through 50 AB's he doesnt have a homerun or a stolen base. Unless he picks it up those whispers of him being a product of coors field are going to just get louder.
Posted by: Chris | April 22, 2009 at 02:20 PM
i've never understood the fascination/want to play for the Yankees. I guess growing up a Dodgers fan, I always thought if I could play for anybody it would be them. I would imagine most would want to play for their home team, too, but I guess not.
Posted by: ThinkBlue | April 22, 2009 at 02:24 PM
I think the Mets are more likely than the Yankees. It'd mean Delgado is gone though.
Posted by: icedrake523 | April 22, 2009 at 02:32 PM
I think a very likely destination for Holliday would be the Red Sox, but that would depend on two things. 1.) If they don't work out an extension for Jason Bay and 2.) If Oakland doesn't decide to just dump his salary to a contender before the trade deadline this year. Both could happen for sure, but the Red Sox have a spot for him and the money to get him.
Posted by: dgiff84 | April 22, 2009 at 02:32 PM
Holy crap I'm glad Newsday isn't going out of business. A Scott Boras client willing to play in the city that pays players the most. Wow. Ken Davidoff should get a pulitzer for that coverage.
Posted by: Getch | April 22, 2009 at 02:37 PM
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the Angels. They could be potentially losing the contracts of Vlad, Lackey, Abreu and Figgins. Seems like a fit to me
Posted by: NR30 | April 22, 2009 at 02:38 PM
Angels would make sense. Lackey probably stays but I could see the other 3 going.
Posted by: icedrake523 | April 22, 2009 at 02:43 PM
Holliday will be in the opening day line-up at Target Field next spring.
One can hope right?
Posted by: Jason Champion | April 22, 2009 at 03:00 PM
The Angels will probably be in the running but the Yankees lose Damon, Nady and Matsui after this year so they'll need Holliday just as badly. If the Yankees want him, they'll get him.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | April 22, 2009 at 03:03 PM
I'm not a Yankee fan, but I think they should be thinking of converting Jeter to a corner outfield spot at some point to improve their infield defense. I agree if the Yankees want Holliday bad they'll get him, I'm just curious if they'll really want to commit to another long contract with other guys available for less years (Manny)
Posted by: NR30 | April 22, 2009 at 03:44 PM
"Angels would make sense."
Yeah, but do you really see the Angels committing on a $20M a year contract? I can guarantee Boras won't budge from there.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | April 22, 2009 at 05:08 PM
I would be shocked if Holliday ends up in NY. I don't think the Yankees will be interested, they would probably prefer a short term deal to Manny instead of another longterm deal to another corner guy. If they lock up Holliday they would then have the two easiest positions on the field locked up very long term, leaving only the DH spot open for any other players they have that may need to move. I would even rather see the Yankees resign Damon to play LF, defense be damned, because he can still hit, he might even be the best leadoff man in baseball. He is definitely top 5, and so underrated as an offensive player. A 1 year deal for Damon with an option, or even a two year deal beats 5 years for Holliday, in the situation the Yankees are in.
As for the Mets, they are committed to Daniel Murphy in left field, not to mention they still have Fernando Martinez waiting around somewhere. Everybody just assumes that Delgado will be gone after the year and Murphy will take over at first base, but honestly I see no reason why Delgado wouldn't be brought back if he was reasonable about what he wanted. The guy can obviously still rake, so if he is willing to work something out, as of right now I would say Delgado is back on the Mets next year.
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 22, 2009 at 05:15 PM
Of course, Boras will be demanding Manny money for him regardless of whether he proves he can hit outside of Denver.
My bet is that the Sox will resign Bay. Josh Reddick will come up in mid-2011 and replace Drew the following year.
Posted by: Little Bear | April 22, 2009 at 05:39 PM
The wild card for the Red Sox is JD Drew. If he spends more than 35 days on the DL with an injury to his bad shoulder or is on the DL at the end of the season and can no longer play the OF the following season, the Red Sox could void his contract. Resign Bay, sign Holliday, and move one to RF.
Posted by: Flynner | April 22, 2009 at 05:58 PM
"Yankees are going to have to give up half there system to get him, because they have only like 2 or 3 good prospects that I have seen."
Are you stupid? Off the top of my head, I can name: Andrew Brackman, Phil Hughes, Joba Chamberlain, Dellin Betances, Alan Horne, Austin Jackson, Jesus Montero, Francisco Cervelli, and Humberto Sanchez.
Posted by: justW353 | April 22, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Have to agree with Little Bear as to the Red Sox -- unless the Yankees sign Bay and force the Sox to pursue Holliday. That said, Matt is probably looking back longingly at the Rockies offer already...
Posted by: little dirt | April 22, 2009 at 06:40 PM
I think with the contracts that are coming off the books after 09 the Giants will make a serious run for Holliday but will have to really overpay to get him since no good power hitter wants to play here.
of course, this is assuming that he gets out of the slump he's in with Oakland and starts hitting homers again
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | April 22, 2009 at 07:19 PM
I can't stand Hollidays swing and i think hes extremely overrated.
Lets see how he does in Oakland this year before we make predictions.... but i am going to go with
4 years 65 million with Mets.
Posted by: lincecum4cy | April 22, 2009 at 07:42 PM
Some Yankee fans are unreasonable. It's commonly known & accepted that the New York Yankees do not have one of the better farm systems in baseball. That's the one thing you can count on with the Yankees. That's not saying that their system is completely void of potential; it's simply stating that they really do not have the talent to give out prospects via trade. Any prospects traded would weaken an already mediocre system.
Posted by: ksesxe | April 22, 2009 at 07:47 PM
What if the market continues to suffer? If it gets bad enough, is there any chance the Rockies would take him back with a slightly watered down version of the offer they made to him last year?
Posted by: BKuGotIt | April 22, 2009 at 08:19 PM
"Here come all the Yankee fans putting out their ridiculous trade ideas before the deadline"
Yankees are going to have to give up half there system to get him, because they have only like 2 or 3 good prospects that I have seen.
Posted by: BravesRed | April 22, 2009 at 01:20 PM
So... if I can't think up of 2-5 prospects of(Whichever team you're a fan of), then they must not exist, right?
If the A's didn't give up much to get him, then why would it take even more to get him when he hasn't been hitting?
I think if 2 more of their OFers go down, then maybe. However, their OF is pretty crowded. Especially now that Nady is coming back. Nady won't be fielding but adding Holliday during the season doesn't make much sense.
I still like Holliday's swing so either him or Bay would be a fine aquisition to me. And if the Yanks make the postseason, then I'd be content with Ajax/Melky/Gardner/Swish.
Posted by: strikethree | April 22, 2009 at 08:59 PM
"Yankees are going to have to give up half there system to get him, because they have only like 2 or 3 good prospects that I have seen."
Are you stupid? Off the top of my head, I can name: Andrew Brackman, Phil Hughes, Joba Chamberlain, Dellin Betances, Alan Horne, Austin Jackson, Jesus Montero, Francisco Cervelli, and Humberto Sanchez.
__________________
Yankees don't have a lot of blue chip position prospects outside of maybe Montero, Ajax and ROmine but they have a LOT of good pitching prospects in their system. I would say they are probably ranked somewhere between top 8-12 farm systems with the Baltimore, Boston, Oakland, Tampa, Texas, toronto, FLorida, Milwaukee, San Francisco, Atlanta and Cleveland being among the top 10 off the top of my head.
Cervelli is all defense and no bat. Probably will never be more than a back up C. Horne and Sanchez started the year on the DL and were hurt most of 2008. Not sure what you can expect from them.
These are, IMO, the guys to watch:
Hughes (108) and IPK (58) are technically over the 50 inning mark to maintain their rookie status but they are still prospects IMO.
"True Rookie" prospects no particular order:
Mark Melacon 24, RP @ AAA
David Roberts 24, RP @ AAA/mlb
Jesus Montero 19, C @ A
Austin Jackson 22, CF @ AAA
Austin Romine 20, C @ A
Zach McAllister 22, SP @ AA
George Kontos 23, SP @ AA
Michael Dunn 24, RP @ AA
Dellin Betances 21, SP @ A
Andrew Brackman 23, SP @ A-
Pat Vindette 23, RP @ A-
My picks as guys to watch:
DJ Mitchell, 22, SP @ A (2008 10TH RND PICK)
Ramiro Pena, 22, SS @ AAA/mlb (already up in the majors but don't think he'll stick).
Eric Fryer, 23, C-OF, A (traded from Milwaukee)
Brandon Laird, 21, 1b-3b @ A (Gerald's brother, 23 hrs in 2008)
Jeremy Bleich, 21, SP @ A (2008 1st rnd comp pick)
David Phelps, 22, SP @ A (2008 late pick)
Addison Maruszak, 22, SS @ A (2008 pick)
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 22, 2009 at 11:25 PM
correction: Melancon
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM
Yankees don't have a lot of blue chip position prospects outside of maybe Montero, Ajax and ROmine but they have a LOT of good pitching prospects in their system. I would say they are probably ranked somewhere between top 8-12 farm systems with the Baltimore, Boston, Oakland, Tampa, Texas, toronto, FLorida, Milwaukee, San Francisco, Atlanta and Cleveland being among the top 10 off the top of my head.''
I would put the dodger system over Baltimore, Cleveland, Milwaukee, and possible Atlanta and SF. The dodgers have their first round of prospects from a few yrs ago in the MLB(Martin, Loney, Kemp, etc). Then they have the new group that has Lambo, Dejesus Jr, Hu(who may finally reach his potenital), Mcdonald, etc. Then the next group garate, Gordon, Withrow, Martin, etc. They have good depth in all levels, espically in the low minors.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | April 22, 2009 at 11:40 PM
The Yanks have been so pitching conscious in the last few drafts and I think they may look towards position players this draft. I really don't have the patience to read up on top amateur players but I'm hoping this years draft is deep.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 22, 2009 at 11:44 PM
"
I would be shocked if Holliday ends up in NY. I don't think the Yankees will be interested, they would probably prefer a short term deal to Manny instead of another longterm deal to another corner guy. If they lock up Holliday they would then have the two easiest positions on the field locked up very long term, leaving only the DH spot open for any other players they have that may need to move. I would even rather see the Yankees resign Damon to play LF, defense be damned, because he can still hit, he might even be the best leadoff man in baseball. He is definitely top 5, and so underrated as an offensive player. A 1 year deal for Damon with an option, or even a two year deal beats 5 years for Holliday, in the situation the Yankees are in.
As for the Mets, they are committed to Daniel Murphy in left field, not to mention they still have Fernando Martinez waiting around somewhere. Everybody just assumes that Delgado will be gone after the year and Murphy will take over at first base, but honestly I see no reason why Delgado wouldn't be brought back if he was reasonable about what he wanted. The guy can obviously still rake, so if he is willing to work something out, as of right now I would say Delgado is back on the Mets next year."
Agreed completely. The way I see it, the Mets have enough payroll room over the next 1-2 years to add one big name. So their options are:
A. Save it for the offseason and try to replace Delgado with a big slugger.
B. Spend it at the deadline for pitching, forgo the slugger in the offseason, and either keep Delgado around or maybe even think about LaRoche. I'm no huge LaRoche fan, but if the Mets could get a Roy onto their staff (Halladay or Oswalt), I'd be completely fine going with a solid but unspectacular, lefty fielding first baseman. He'd be a defensive improvement, and projection systems are unusually consistent on LaRoche, an OPS in the low-mid .800s with 20-30 homers and a decent average and solid OBP. They'd be a slightly differently built team, more about pitching and defense, but it could be the difference for them this year and shouldn't hurt their chances next year.
Posted by: MEddler | April 23, 2009 at 01:06 AM
"The Yanks have been so pitching conscious in the last few drafts and I think they may look towards position players this draft."
Some teams will do this, Boston also with pitchers (power pitchers mostly) and then 5 tool athletes for positional players that have all the tools and it leaves out guys that are power guys as a result it seems.
I also have just begun scouting as to what the draft is looking like YFS and making a wish list and hoping that Boston will be able to swipe away a few golden gems in the lower rounds that are considered non signable by other teams once again, since our favorite teams always get low picks and must go about the draft in that way.
Posted by: johns | April 23, 2009 at 03:39 AM
can we please call Matt Holliday what he is, OVERRATED only 2 30/100 seasons, only 1 200+ hit season, how is he considered better than Jason Bay? sure he has a little better avg, but Bay has shown to be a better run producer throughout his career. I just don't get the Holliday love affair.
Posted by: buttaplaydtoast | April 23, 2009 at 06:11 AM
Matt Holliday is not overrated. The mets would need him in there horrid defensive outfield. Daniel Murphy is not a leftfield, he is a great hitter but not a fielder. Holliday can help us fielding and can hit in the 3 spot in front of delgado cuz wright is not a 3 hitter
Posted by: TheAMAZIN'METS | April 23, 2009 at 08:09 AM
The Yanks system, while not one of the top systems in the game right now, has improved over the past few years. While I don't think it's as good as some of the Yankee fans on here think (obviously), I will acknowledge that they do have some chips to trade if they wanted to make a move. But, I don't see AJax being traded, as he's the only long-term CF the team has in the system and clearly the guys they have now aren't the long-term answer and I don't see them trading Hughes because he's got such a high ceiling. After those two guys, you have some prospects who either are boom or bust types (Montero) and/or very low in the minors (Brackman, Betances, etc) with years of development ahead before they reach the bigs. So unless a team is willing to take a shot on these guys in the low minors, or the Yanks decide to finally trade a guy like Hughes, I see it difficult to pull in a player like Holliday via trade when there are teams with better systems who could make a run for him. Now I don't claim to be an expert in the Yanks system, so correct me if I'm wrong here.
Posted by: Papelboner | April 23, 2009 at 08:53 AM
As for the Red Sox signing both Bay and Holliday and putting one in RF- I think that would be a bad decision. Neither one of those guys are great defensive LF and RF in Fenway is one of the hardest OF positions to play in the bigs, IMO. Drew actually plays a very solid RF (when he's out there).
Posted by: Papelboner | April 23, 2009 at 08:55 AM
I would be shocked and highly dissapointed if Cash traded any prospects for Holliday. It just went be a smart move considering that you only would have him for a couple of months, and there's ZERO chance Boras would want to talk extension prior to FA.
This kid Montero is looking really good. I think he gets bumped to AA by JUne/July and if he mashes there I can see him starting the 2010 season @ AAA.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 23, 2009 at 09:45 AM
"Matt Holliday is not overrated. The mets would need him in there horrid defensive outfield. Daniel Murphy is not a leftfield, he is a great hitter but not a fielder. Holliday can help us fielding and can hit in the 3 spot in front of delgado cuz wright is not a 3 hitter"
Matt Holliday was a brutal left fielder early in his career. You know how he improved? By (gasp!) playing left field! What a concept! Murphy has played all of about 50 professional games in LF, after never playing the outfield in his life. Is it surprising that he has made a few miscues? Honestly, he hasn't been completely horrible either, aside from the dropped flyball in Miami. Slipping going for a flyball can happen to anybody and besides those two issues, he has been decent. Not that LF defense matters a ton, especially when you have Beltran patrolling center and Church in right. Bottom line, I will be very disappointed if the Mets sign Holliday. Like Meddler said, I just keep Murphy in LF, wait and see on Fernando Martinez, and either resign Delgado, or find a cheap replacement for him, and use that money on the rotation.
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 23, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Matt holiday will be a met by the deadline for fernando martinez.
Posted by: beastOftheEast | April 23, 2009 at 07:25 PM
Im sorry, but why the HELL would the mets trade Fmart for Holliday, for 3 months of Holliday, but not even be willing to include him in Santana?? I dont know why any competing team would trade for him, because they wont get any hook ups with resigning him
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | April 23, 2009 at 07:37 PM
Why is everyone enamored with Holliday? He isn't that good. Guy should have taken that 4 years and 82 million and ran to the bank.
Posted by: optionn | April 23, 2009 at 10:11 PM
of course he's interested because he'll know that he's getting top dollar. The Yanks will offer more than any other team just to make sure they get their man
Posted by: csg | April 24, 2009 at 08:30 AM
I think it was poor taste that Holliday is talking about playing for another team while a member of the A's. Until his contract runs out with them, he ought to show more loyalty to them than this. It's disheartening for a player to answer this kind of question like that.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | April 24, 2009 at 08:39 AM
Ill rub my crystal ball and pretty much guarantee that the Yanks will sign Holliday to some ungodly fat cash contract. I also wouldnt put it past them to try and sign Ordonez as well if he ends up on the market.
Posted by: xethicx | April 24, 2009 at 08:40 AM
I honestly don't think the Yanks are that interested in dealing with Holiday/Boras. They're not stupid. They have access to the same information everyone else does. Unless Holliday posts superb numbers like he did in Colorado (.330/.380 30/30)then I don't see it. And as long as Arod shows he's healthy then I don't see the need for a MAJOR BIG BAT, other than the most obvious one.....Manny, who can be had for a lot cheaper and a lot shorter term.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 24, 2009 at 08:52 AM
Nothing would make me happier than for the Yankees to replace those fat, unmovable, expiring contracts (e.g., Matsui) with...fat, unmovable, LONG TERM contracts. I hope they sign Holliday to a ten year/$180m. deal.
Posted by: MickS | April 24, 2009 at 08:55 AM
Wow...I'm sorry. I didn't know that 4/52 mil was "fat and unmoveable". Matsui had played in 162 games in his 1st 3 years with the Yanks before they resigned him on the 4 year deal.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 24, 2009 at 09:23 AM
For an old player w/o any knees, yes, 4/52 was fat and unmovable. You think they didn't try to move Matsui? Anyway, here's hoping he gets replaced by Holliday at some utterly ridiculous years and dollars deal.
Posted by: MickS | April 24, 2009 at 09:33 AM
"Matt Holliday was a brutal left fielder early in his career. You know how he improved? By (gasp!) playing left field! What a concept! Murphy has played all of about 50 professional games in LF, after never playing the outfield in his life. Is it surprising that he has made a few miscues? Honestly, he hasn't been completely horrible either, aside from the dropped flyball in Miami. Slipping going for a flyball can happen to anybody and besides those two issues, he has been decent. Not that LF defense matters a ton, especially when you have Beltran patrolling center and Church in right. Bottom line, I will be very disappointed if the Mets sign Holliday. Like Meddler said, I just keep Murphy in LF, wait and see on Fernando Martinez, and either resign Delgado, or find a cheap replacement for him, and use that money on the rotation."
I completely agree with this post. Use the money for pitching improvements. Remember, there is no guarantee that Johan will make it through his contract without getting hurt/declining in performance. None.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 24, 2009 at 09:38 AM
I cant see the yanks,mets or red sox making a move for him unless they have a 72 hr window to sign him to an extention.
Also have the yanks not learned yet that building a farm system and having players play together for a couple of years in the minors actually works and wins. yea you dont win every year but you have club house chemistry and have fun playing the game. the yanks two best players dont like each other adding another boras client , a prima donna, would just add to the problem. the yanks arent a team they are a bunch of high paid talented players who only play for themselves.
Posted by: derman1984 | April 24, 2009 at 09:46 AM
I look into my crystal ball and see Holliday signing...with the Giants or the Dodgers (if Manny opts out).
Posted by: melonis rex | April 24, 2009 at 09:53 AM
For an old player w/o any knees, yes, 4/52 was fat and unmovable. You think they didn't try to move Matsui? Anyway, here's hoping he gets replaced by Holliday at some utterly ridiculous years and dollars deal.
-----------------
Ok I'll say this slowly. When he was signed they based it off of the fact it was for years 32-35 and he had played 162 games in 3 years in a row. It turned out to be a "fat and immovable" contract becuase he had knee problems AFTER the deal was signed but that happens. But a 4 year deal isn't a major risk, especially for a team like the Yanks.
Now in the case of Holliday, Boras would most likely ask for something 6 years or better, and I really don't think there's anyone in the Yankee FO that covets Matt Holiday.
Sabathia and Burnett were absolute needs.
Cash and others saw a need and coveted (is that a word?) Tex and wanted to block Boston to boot.
Hank has a love jones for Manny.
I can see the Yanks taking that 120 mil that Holliday will try and get and instead spend $50 mil on Manny, $10-20 mil on a short term deal for one of Crisp, Nady or Damon. I think that as long as Arod is healthy and Wang rights himself the Yanks will probably have a relatively quiet winter (no major 100 mil+++ signings).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM
I cant see the yanks,mets or red sox making a move for him unless they have a 72 hr window to sign him to an extention.
Also have the yanks not learned yet that building a farm system and having players play together for a couple of years in the minors actually works and wins. yea you dont win every year but you have club house chemistry and have fun playing the game. the yanks two best players dont like each other adding another boras client , a prima donna, would just add to the problem. the yanks arent a team they are a bunch of high paid talented players who only play for themselves.
------------------
Yeah your right. Tex turned down more money from the Nationals because it was all about him. Arod, who could've gone down as the greatest SS ever decided to move to 3b, a position he never played, because it was all about him.
Sabathia and Burnett? They don't want to win.
Now of course money absolutely plays a major part in any players decision but to say these guys don't want to win is absolute bull.
Also, can we please...please....please stop with this idea that just because you didn't come thru the farm together that you can't win together. Please keep in mind also, that Tex, nady and Swisher are the only 3 starting position players that haven't been with this organization for at least 4 years. And 3/5ths of the starting rotation are homegrown players. In fact name me 1 team that has 4 star caliber players (Jeter, Posada, Pettite and Rivera) that have been together for at least 10 years? If that's not continuity then I'm not sure what is.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 24, 2009 at 10:37 AM
I've been assuming that the Yankees would acquire Holliday since around November. I also have them signing one of either Rich Harden or Brett Myers. Possibly Marlon Byrd as a DH.
I'm putting their 2010 payroll around $216 Million.
And then they will get dominated by the Rays and Sox again.
One more prediction: Pujols to Boston before 2011.
Posted by: kevinb | April 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Scratch that on Pujols, forgot the Cardinals had a 2011 option on him.
Posted by: kevinb | April 24, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Gah, I don't know where my brain is today. Milton Bradley, not Marlon Byrd.
Posted by: kevinb | April 24, 2009 at 11:12 AM
And now I realize Bradley isn't a free agent for 2010.
I need more sleep.
Posted by: kevinb | April 24, 2009 at 11:14 AM
"I look into my crystal ball and see Holliday signing...with the Giants or the Dodgers (if Manny opts out)."
I'll agree with this, but also throw the Angels in there as a possibility depending on what happens with Vladimir Guerrero.
The Giants obviously need a big time bat, and although they have some good guys coming through the system, it's not likely that many of them will be able to make quality contributions in 2010. The team should be prepared to contend by then, but it could possibly be necessary for them to add a big bopper before that happens.
As for the Dodgers, they'll obviously have some money freed up if Manny opts out, and I'd presume that they'd show some interest in the next best hitter on the market.
Another dark horse could be the White Sox, if they don't bring back Dye. Holliday could play left with Quentin moving over to right, and he'd give them a scary hitter to replace what's lost between Thome and Dye. KW generally doesn't spend much in free agency, but I think the scenario is plausible.
I think that the Red Sox end up bringing back Bay, and the Yankees seem more likely to avoid signing Holliday to a monster deal after all the cash they shelled out last winter.
Posted by: scribbletone | April 24, 2009 at 11:29 AM
"The Giants obviously need a big time bat, and although they have some good guys coming through the system"
Poor Giants, Sabean seems to go into each off season and sign the "most likely to stink" instead of a player that will actually help push them into contention. Dave Roberts, Rowand, Renteria, Zito. He better hope he hangs on for awhile, cause he'll never get another GM job. Sabean could have gotten Dunn, or Abreu as examples for small change and helped the offense, yet stayed back and played like they were waiting on Ramirez and ended up with nothing. Now they are doomed again.
Posted by: johns | April 24, 2009 at 01:10 PM
I've been assuming that the Yankees would acquire Holliday since around November. I also have them signing one of either Rich Harden or Brett Myers. Possibly Marlon Byrd as a DH.
----------
I really don't see the Yanks bighting on either one of those. Of course I'm expecting Wang to right himself but I see the 2010 staff being CC, AJ, Wang, Joba and Hughes. Harden is too big of an injury risk and we already have one of those. Myers is a good back end starter but I think that spot goes to a cheeper option like Hughes who also has much more upside.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 24, 2009 at 02:09 PM
"I've been assuming that the Yankees would acquire Holliday since around November. I also have them signing one of either Rich Harden or Brett Myers. Possibly Marlon Byrd as a DH."
The Yankees should not sign another FA pitcher. Ian Kennedy and Phil Hughes are just fine.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 24, 2009 at 03:50 PM
If I were the Yankees, I let Nady and Matsui walk, resign Damon if possible to a 1 year deal with an option plus buyout, and sign Manny Ramirez, when he opts out. You have Manny DHing, then playing LF when Jorge has to DH, and moving Damon over to CF during those games with Swisher playing RF everyday. Keep Melky or Gardner around to play CF when Damon is in left. The defense may struggle somewhat, but their offense would be plain absurd , along with their rotation and bullpen. Also keeps things short term, rather then giving out huge bucks to Holliday.
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 24, 2009 at 05:06 PM
I know I'll probably get bashed for saying this but I really feel that Cash is structuring the organization to be more self-sufficient YET ready, willing and capable of pulling the trigger on a big "difference maker" when the opportunity makes sense. I think the Swisher trade shows that. He was acquired so that they didn't HAVE TO sign Tex if the price became too steep. I think the CC and AJ signings makes them legitimate WS contenders WHILE at the same time allowing their young arms like Hughes, IPK, McAllister, Betances, Brackman, and other to take their time and develop at their own pace. Additionally, by design or by luck I think the Yanks have a couple of in-house options for some of their aging players.
Mariano might be succeeded by Mark Melancon or maybe Bruney.
Posada might be succeeded by Jesus Montero or Austin Romine.
Jeter might be moved to a new position and Ramiro Pena might take over @ SS.
And of course Austin Jackson should be ready to take over CF by 2010 or 2011. In the meantime we hope Gardner or Melky show us something positive and become options at LF.
I think the organization is as healthy as it's been since the mid-90's. ANd now that they have several promising arms in the low minors (DJ Mitchell, Brett Marshall, Jeremy Bleich, Wilson De La Rosa, etc) I think Cash should stock up on college bats and maybe go over slot on great high school players who might be seen as "hard to sign" because they're college recruits.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | April 24, 2009 at 05:27 PM
I would really rather have Bay than Holliday. Holliday has done nothing so far.
Posted by: yankfan1 | April 24, 2009 at 06:43 PM
Austin Jackson would be ready next year. So the Yankees will need a RF/LF and a DH. To replace Matsui, Damon, Nady.
Posted by: yankfan1 | April 24, 2009 at 06:45 PM
yankfan1, what has Bay done? Neither has done A LOT, although Holliday has at least been to a WS. Bay was on a crap team, got lucky to get traded to Boston, to a playoff contender. Holliday has been on COL, got hot one yr, but really only good to improve stats, then Oak, who has to go through the angels and Rangers. Bay has been luckier because he has gotten more public acnowledgement, and therefore people think he is a better player.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | April 24, 2009 at 10:55 PM
What has Bay done? Only posted OPS+ of 132, 150, 138 and 134 in 4 of his 5 years, and the only year which he posted under 100 was an injury plagued 2007. And what do world series appearances have to do with anything? Bay gets more public acknowledgment then Holliday? What are you talking about? For 2 or 3 years now, we have to hear everyday how Matt Holliday is the greatest thing since sliced bread. This guy was a huge name. I think half the major league baseball fans didn't even know who Jason Bay was until he got traded to Boston, despite being one of the better hitters in baseball for going on 6 years now. He is one of the more underrated players in baseball, and he never got near the exposure Holliday did. I would think that 95 percent of baseball fans think Holliday is the better player then Bay, I really don't know many people at all that would choose him over Holliday, though I might. They are both good players. However, Bay produced in a crappy lineup in Pittsburgh, where Holliday produced in a mashers lineup in a hitters haven. I still think if you polled a group of baseball fans a large majority of them would pick Holliday.
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 25, 2009 at 11:07 AM
"The Yankees should not sign another FA pitcher. Ian Kennedy and Phil Hughes are just fine."
If the Yankees can get their hands on Peavy, one of the wonder boys will have to go in order to get him.
If not, I would say that if the 200 million dollar machine fails this year, I would expect to see one of the wonder boys in the wonder pen next season to make way for... you got it, another high priced free agent pitcher.
Posted by: xethicx | April 25, 2009 at 02:23 PM
"What has Bay done? Only posted OPS+ of 132, 150, 138 and 134 in 4 of his 5 years, and the only year which he posted under 100 was an injury plagued 2007. And what do world series appearances have to do with anything? Bay gets more public acknowledgment then Holliday? What are you talking about?...I still think if you polled a group of baseball fans a large majority of them would pick Holliday."
I agree with this. World Series appearances are completely irrelevant. The only reason I'd pick Holliday right now (and that will change if he doesn't start putting up overall solid stats in Oakland) is because of his basestealing abilities and the fact that he is a better defender than Bay. As hitters, they are pretty much the same, honestly, Bay might have the slight edge when factoring in PNC v. Coors.
I'm willing to give Holliday a pass for his hitting right now. Right now, the entire A's lineup is tanking, and Geren is being a moron by not having Cust and Suzuki batting higher in the order, because they are the only two who are hitting. Hell, I think the best order right now would be Cust 3rd and Suzuki batting cleanup (or Cust 2nd Suzuki 3rd).
The only logical reason to keep Holliday batting 3rd is as a precursor to a trade happening like, right now. Which is a good thing.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 25, 2009 at 06:03 PM
...what happened to the rest of my comment?
Continued--
The A's need to step back and reevaluate their pitchers, and send quite a few of them back to AAA.
I also want to see what Buck, Sweeney, and Cunningham can do over a full season of ABs. (Unless of course my ultimate Holliday trade scenario happens and the A's grab this guy who will have to play in the OF until Eric Chavez gets hurt).
If OCab draws interest, he should be traded at the deadline as well so the A's can see what they have with Pennington.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 25, 2009 at 06:11 PM
"I know I'll probably get bashed for saying this but I really feel that Cash is structuring the organization to be more self-sufficient YET ready, willing and capable of pulling the trigger on a big "difference maker" when the opportunity makes sense. I think the Swisher trade shows that. He was acquired so that they didn't HAVE TO sign Tex if the price became too steep. I think the CC and AJ signings makes them legitimate WS contenders WHILE at the same time allowing their young arms like Hughes, IPK, McAllister, Betances, Brackman, and other to take their time and develop at their own pace. Additionally, by design or by luck I think the Yanks have a couple of in-house options for some of their aging players."
I think its more by design. Cashman could have targetted guys who are closer to MLB ready, but didn't. By drafting/signing guys who will be ready at the time that the primary core is hitting FA/departing as opposed to creating a logjam right now. I honestly like Cashman's strategy, although the lack of depth in the IF right now is hurting.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 25, 2009 at 06:13 PM
This could read: "Matt Holliday Interested in Money"... and it would be the same exact thing.
Posted by: jpkinney7 | April 29, 2009 at 10:57 AM