MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Brewers Aren't Talking Peavy Trade | Main | White Sox Looking For Starting Pitching »

White Sox Acquire Ramon Castro, DFA Miller

SATURDAY, 9:57am: According to Mark Gonzales of the Chicago Tribune the White Sox will designate catcher Corky Miller for assignment today. The 33-year-old career backup batted 42 times this year, hitting .205/.262/.282.

FRIDAY, 10:06pm: Mets GM Omar Minaya just announced that the Mets shipped Castro to the Sox for pitcher Lance BroadwaySox Machine says this makes Broadway an official first-round bust.

8:59pm: SI's Jon Heyman says the White Sox are talking to the Mets about their catchers, probably Castro, and "it appears there's a decent chance a trade can be reached." 

4:41pm: According to Adam Rubin of the New York Daily News, the Mets are trying to trade catcher Ramon Castro before Saturday's game (hat tip to MetsBlog).  They've spoken to the Mariners, who just lost Kenji Johjima for a couple of months.  Rubin says the Mets are not prepared to eat Castro's remaining $1.79MM.  Castro is a solid offensive catcher, so he should draw interest.


Comments

injury prone but a very serviceable backup catcher with some pop in the bat; any takers?

Man oh man. I was never a huge fan of Castro, even though he is easily the best offensive catcher the Mets have, he always annoyed me because I thought he could have been more. He never seemed dedicated to baseball, or staying in shape. Three years in a row he went down when he was needed most, when he would have finally gotten MLB time. That said, he is much better then Santos. I like Santos, I think he has done more then anybody could have asked from him, but still. Send him back down to the minors and call him back up later in the year, when Schneider or Castro inevitably goes down again.

It is probably the fault of Metsblog that most of the fanbase has hopped onto the Omir Santos is the best player in the world bandwagon, and like I said, he has definitely been useful, but Castro/Schneid is still easily the best catching combo the Mets can go with. If the Mets eat Castro's entire salary, the should be able to get a decent enough player back, Castro is capable of .250/.320/.450 type line... if he can stay healthy.

Could the Tigers be takers? Treanor is out for the season and Laird is not hitting.

At this point, I think the Mets need to eat the contract, especially if they can get something decent in return. I can't see the reasoning behind sending Santos back down considering the pitching staff has stepped it up and seem to enjoy throwing to him.

"I can't see the reasoning behind sending Santos back down considering the pitching staff has stepped it up and seem to enjoy throwing to him.
"

Because he is clearly the worst of the three catching options, not to mention he is the only of the 3 that can be sent to the minors?

Castro for Branyan

Tigers should at least think about this. Treanor is out and Sardinia is hitting below .100.

From the Mets perspective what is the hurry in trading Ramon Castro? How productive is he just hitting .253BA, 3HRS and 13RBI. How are his defensive skills? You might look at it and say well they called up Guillermo Quiroz when they lost Johjima for close to 2 months.

And why would the M's try to trade for him? Its not as if the M's are short on MLB ready catchers. They have Jamie Burke in their minor league system hitting a .367BA as the back up for the Tacoma Rainiers. Burke was told that the M's were going in a different/younger direction and that is why he was not called up. While Jeff Clement is bothered by knee injury and unavailable to catch they also have Adam Moore who could use an opportunity to prove himself.

Even if this trade makes sense what would the Mets want in return. Maybe this is an opportunity to deal Washburn in a deal. Something like Washburn to the Mets for SP Dillon GEE, C Ramon Castro and SS Ruben Tejada

"Something like Washburn to the Mets for SP Dillon Gee, C Ramon Castro and SS Ruben Tejada"

You're kidding, right?

"Maybe this is an opportunity to deal Washburn in a deal. Something like Washburn to the Mets for SP Dillon GEE, C Ramon Castro and SS Ruben Tejada"

Maybe the Mets should throw in David Wright too.

Jarrod Washburn has been incredible this year. In 57.1IP Washburn is sporting a 3.45ERA, 41K and just 16BB. It has been said that he has remade himself. With the Mets so eager to trade Castro, this deal is more like Washburn for Gee/Tejada.

I think the Giants were looking for a good backup catcher to Bengie. Could be a fit. I don't know who the Mets would want in return.

Dixoner, you're crazy. I highly doubt Omar would make a trade that dumb.

meh i could find better

Whoa whoa whoa.

The Mets are contenders in a tough division.

The Mets are shopping Ramon Castro, who is the team's best offensive catcher AND a suitable option to PH off the bench in late innings.

Ramon Castro's career MAJOR LEAGUE OPS is about 100 points higher than Omir Santos' career MINOR LEAGUE OPS.

This reeks of stupid.

"I think the Giants were looking for a good backup catcher to Bengie. Could be a fit. I don't know who the Mets would want in return."

That actually would make a lot of sense. In the sense that the Giants could acquire Castro to back up Molina for now, trade Molina later on in the season, and make Castro the starter (since Posey probs won't be ready this season)

""Something like Washburn to the Mets for SP Dillon Gee, C Ramon Castro and SS Ruben Tejada"

You're kidding, right?"

lol ice, I don't think he is. You should see some of the madness coming from this guy the last couple of days.

"This reeks of stupid."

Aka, this reeks of Jerry Manuel. Where is my guy Mr. Meddler to talk some sense. It must be Santos quick swing, huh? I like Santos and what he has done, but if you have to choose between losing Castro completely to keep Santos on the MLB roster, or sending Santos down, where he is still quite readily available if he is needed, and keeping Castro, the choice is an easy one.

And Dillon Gee, Ramon Castro, and Ruben Tejeda for Jarrod Washburn? How about not.

"It has been said that he has remade himself. With the Mets so eager to trade Castro, this deal is more like Washburn for Gee/Tejada."

Oh, I'm sorry. Since it has been said that he has remade himself, that literally changes everything. Fernando Martinez, Brad Holt, and Wilmer Flores should seal the deal in the case. My mistake, I did not know that he had remade himself.

"Because he is clearly the worst of the three catching options, not to mention he is the only of the 3 that can be sent to the minors?"

That's arguable. Castro is a disaster behind the plate and isn't a good hitter. Not to mention he's a tortoise on the basepaths. If he's on first and someone hits a DP groundball to SS, he's not even half way to 2B. He never hustles and gets away with it.

Hey ICE no need for bashing. It was the Rays Manager who had said that Washburn had "re-invented himself". I don't know much about other teams minor league systems and how important their players stand. I do know a fairly good deal about the M's and its organization. All I am saying is that Washburn is having what is close to a career year for him and it could be a good time for a contender such as the Mets to take advantage of this. They don't even have to keep him around after the season if they don't like what they see because he is on the final year of his contract. I think he is worth at least two Decent minor league prospects.

"The Mets are shopping Ramon Castro, who is the team's best offensive catcher AND a suitable option to PH off the bench in late innings."
He is not the team's best offensive catcher. You rarely, if ever, pinch hit with your catcher. Sorry, but that's a dumb reason to keep him around.

"Ramon Castro's career MAJOR LEAGUE OPS is about 100 points higher than Omir Santos' career MINOR LEAGUE OPS."

You fail to mention Castro is the worst defensive catcher on the team (a big thing for the position) and is never healthy. I personally hate how he never hustles. The Mets also did not like that he was ambivalent when given the opportunity to be the everyday catcher. That lack of desire is very discouraging.

Castro to the M's?!?! Uuummm NO! Won't happen M's will be sellers here soon enough.

Can you say Phillies and M's Pitching deal!

Bastardo SP and Donald SS going to the AL...For Bedard or Washburn...

"You rarely, if ever, pinch hit with your catcher. Sorry, but that's a dumb reason to keep him around."

There isn't a hard and fast rule about pinch hitting and bullpen/PH matchups. Except that you don't let Matt Diaz face your LOOGY. Castro is a markedly better hitter than Angel Pagan, Jeremy Reed, Alex Cora, and Ramon Martinez.

"You fail to mention Castro is the worst defensive catcher on the team (a big thing for the position) and is never healthy."

But Schneider is a great defensive catcher, and he's the starter. He'll see most of the innings behind the plate.

And, that's why you keep Santos down in AAA to call up if Castro or Schneider gets hurt. If you trade Castro and Schneider gets hurt again, the Mets are s.crewed because Santos is NOT an MLB-caliber catcher.

Santos is too good of a hitter hes won us 3 or 4 games this year

According to Jon Heyman's Twitter, the Mets and White Sox are talking catching.

http://twitter.com/SI_JonHeyman

If Santos is any better then Castro (he isn't), it is not even close to enough better to lose Castro just to keep Santos on the big squad. Castro isn't a great hitter, but he is a dangerous hitter, and a better hitter then Santos is. Believe me, I don't love Castro by any means, like I said I always felt like he could be better if he was in better shape and dedicated himself to baseball. But Castro is a much better offensive player then Santos, even Schneider is, Schneider will give you the same empty .250-.260 average as Santos, but atleast he has some plate discipline.

Again, I like Santos and he has done well for the Mets. But I definitely don't think that you bet Castro on the fact that Santos is going to sustain this offensive production he has never seen before. What happens in 2 months when Santos is sitting at .240/.270./.380 and Castro is gone. Then what do you do. The biggest thing here is if you send Santos down you don't lose anybody and Santos is still here if you need him. You would lose Castro just to have Santos stay on the big team? I wouldn't.

Personally I feel that the difference between Castro and Santos in the end is going to be a couple of average points and an RBI or two. Also it seems that everyone is over thinking the use of Castro. In the past two seasons he has played 52 games in each (2007 & 2008)... So I say why not get something for him while the Mets can.

Seems like a dumb move for the Sox to be taking in another catcher With Corky and Flowers waiting in the wings when AJ is done

you can't DFA Santos he wins games it is that simple

Omir Santos hits a homerun and a walk off single to win the game. Omir Santos is the best catcher in the league and he must not be moved. Okay.

Seriously though, a couple points for Buzz. One, yes, if you count RBI's and BA as the two most important things, they look similar. If you care anything at all about OBP or SLG, then there is not much comparison. Two, if you feel like they are a wash, then why would you be willing to lose Castro to keep Santos on the roster, rather then send Santos down and have both guys remain in the organization. Wouldn't that be the best bet, if in fact they are a wash?

And I effing love Gary Sheffield.

i can see castro in a package for penny or in a bigger package for dye.
not for nothing, but Santos brings a lot to the table that the Mets dont have at C... high energy, good defense, SP likes pitching to him, good speed, & he has been very clutch.
Castro is good, but very expendible to help bring in an OF or SP.
They cant move schneider. Also, they still have Thole & Cancel in the minors who are good enough just-in-case catchers.

Have you Santos haters watched games? The pitching staff loves him, and he's hit well. That said, Castro has been an awesome back-up catcher for years now. Schneider is the worst of the three; notice how well they've played since he's been out. I would leave him out for as long as they can, or try to trade/release him. Castro-Santos is what is working for the Mets.

metzfan22- I agree with you that Schneider doesnt seem to help their lineup that much...maybe I am remembering wrong, but hopefully he will come back a better hitter.

nrmax88: The only problem is Castro is being paid more than Santos and is a free agent after this year if I remember correct. If you know you are going to lose the guy why not get something for him? I am not saying you are going to get a top prospect or anyone good for that matter but maybe you could get a fringe guy or a low level prospect, if the Mets eat the contract. I would like to see them keep them both but they want to dump Castro's contract and they think they have stumbled upon a decent replacement for him.

NrMax -- we are screwed.... manuel just said on the post-game santos will be on this team tomorrow... jerry is heading into willie territory with his stupidity. and i love sheff to

I didn't think Ramon Castro could be overrated until after reading some comments. He has power but nothing else, he can barely move, he is a lousy defensive catcher, and is never healthy for a full season.

Wow, you guys seriously want to keep Castro? The guy is a load behind the plate, pitchers can't be confident to throw off the plate and in the dirt because he won't move for anything but lunch.

Yeah, he gets some hits, but he makes no attempt to adjust himself at the plate, watch Santos, he can hit hard stuff, as well as adjust his swing to drive the ball the other way.

Castro also has no spark, this team needs those guys who will make the best of the chances they are given. Look at Tatis last year, Santos this year.

We would have gotten rid of Castro in the Spring, but no one wanted the contract, so what has he done since then to show the team he should stay?

"Have you Santos haters watched games? The pitching staff loves him, and he's hit well. That said, Castro has been an awesome back-up catcher for years now. Schneider is the worst of the three; notice how well they've played since he's been out. I would leave him out for as long as they can, or try to trade/release him. Castro-Santos is what is working for the Mets."

Are you honestly willing to bet that Omir Santos' TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY NINE plate appearances of .260/.300/.350 hitting are an aberration and he magically turned into the .270/.310/.450 guy that we have seen for 80 at bats? I don't know, maybe he did. Maybe he is a freak who just figured something out. Maybe he succeeds against higher level pitching because they are more around the plate. That is possible, but highly unlikely.

It is more likely that because he swings at everything, he puts the ball in play, and has been fairly lucky. It is also likely that once pitchers discover that he swings at everything, he will trend back towards his career norms.

Just consider this. Coming into tonights game, Omir Santos has a line of .270/.300/.437, compared to Castro's .250/.320/.430. Now, first of all, though the lines are similar, Castro's is better. Second of all, this is just what you would expect Castro to do, as it is almost right in line with his career norms. Now, consider that Castro is doing what he normally does, and Santos is playing about 100 points of OPS higher then his minor league averages. So how can you keep Santos and lose a player that has a much longer and better track record based on 80 at bats vs the 2000 AB track record he has in the minors? It just doesn't make sense.

I would love to be wrong. I would love for Santos to somehow turn into a .750 OPS guy with solid defense and catch for the Mets for the next 5 years. I would be absolutely thrilled to be proven wrong by Santos. It is not personal, I am just going by the numbers, and you could in no way justify dumping Castro off to keep Santos on the big league roster, when you could have just sent him back to AAA to begin with.

Traded to the Sox for Lance Broadway

I hope the sox took his contract or that is a bad trade.

ice -- i dont think castro is very good either... our catchers are pretty damn awful... but that GW hit is 90 percent of the time a weak liner to the SS with the IF at normal depth. the smartest thing to do as mentioned already here is to send santos down and... well castro was traded... just heard it on WFAN. F!CK! send santos down and hang on to him till schneid or castro gets injured... luckily we have valentin at AAA

I looked at the wrong player so I take back that last contract...hopefully he will pan out for the mets in AAA

"Yeah, he gets some hits, but he makes no attempt to adjust himself at the plate, watch Santos, he can hit hard stuff, as well as adjust his swing to drive the ball the other way."

I agree with this. Castro gets a fraction of production from what his talent is capable of giving him. Santos gets almost 100 percent out of himself. This makes it seem like Santos is the better player, but he just isn't. Even in the limited sample size above his head this year, he still isn't better then Castro. I am not very fond of Castro, and I love Santos and his passion and all that, but when it comes down to it, Castro just has a track record of being a reasonably productive major league hitter, where Santos has a track record of being a pretty poor minor league hitter. I would love for the Mets to move Castro and for Santos to continue on like this all year, I just can't make my heart tell my head that 80 plate appearances of sort of good offense out weighs over 2000 plate appearances where he wasn't productive at all.

metsknicksrutgers-

WHAT? Seriously? Castro traded to the White Sox? This is stupid on many levels.

buzz128: How is it a bad trade? The kid is 25 and a former first round pick. I think this is a good trade. And Minaya said money is being exchanged. He pans out to his potential he could be good. If any Sox fans would give us a scouting report that would be good.

I guess it's moot now. I'll be rooting for Santos, without question, but I just can't make myself believe that he will out produce Ramon Castro this year.

The team is better with Castro. Santos will be the more productive player b/c he will play more often. They need to get younger at that position, too, even if it's just backup.

Santos' game winning hit doesn't change anything for me. I've wanted Castro gone for years and they finally have a player to justify dumping him.

BTW nrmax, still think the Santana deal was a mistake?

The team is better with Castro. Santos will be the more productive player b/c he will play more often. They need to get younger at that position, too, even if it's just backup.

Santos' game winning hit doesn't change anything for me. I've wanted Castro gone for years and they finally have a player to justify dumping him.

BTW nrmax, still think the Santana deal was a mistake?

numbers, numbers, numbers!

All you guys see is numbers!

This isn't a video game or a Fantasy League, it's the real thing and heart and attitude count just as much as stats.

It is a delicate balance and it is what wins championships. If Santos reverts to his career averages, but those hits are the type he has been getting we will never look back at what Castro did, and didn't do.

Melonis -- yup... on another note... fudge a laker... any chisox fans give us the lowdown on broadway? ive heard of him, but never seen him play...slidepiece...dave concepcion

captkeith -- i am all fine with heart grission edge or whatever... but unfortunately it is a subjective opinion... what makes these guys have heart? well generally at least IMO its luck (high babip).

santos actually has an extremely low babip considering his ld%

I'm a sox fan,

Broadway is not overpowering, strictly finesse. 87-89 rarely 90mph. Nice change up. Been a long reliever and used when we r up big or down a lot. In the NL, 4-5 starter. I kinds liked him, but Richard has established himself now so he was expendable

"BTW nrmax, still think the Santana deal was a mistake?"

Do I still think it was a mistake to give a pitcher a 7 year contract? Yes. Make however many snide remarks you want, but if you think I am going to concede the point that giving a pitcher a 7 year deal is a bad idea, no matter who the pitcher, after 1.25 seasons into said 7 year deal, I am not.

It isn't as if I root for Santana to get hurt so I can run back here and say I told you so, it just is a very dangerous thing to do. Santana hes been beyond spectacular, that doesn't decrease the risk of paying him 118 million dollars for his 30-35 seasons.

what??? lance broadway the once cant miss prospect for a washed up catcher

williams must really be losing it

good deal for minaya though

"numbers, numbers, numbers!

All you guys see is numbers!"

Yes, well, numbers are what make baseball baseball. Having heart and trying hard, unfortunately, don't make it more likely for you to get a big hit in a big spot.

The guy9, he was a can't miss prospect a while ago...now he's a long reliever, maybe back end in the nl. Kenny got a nice backup catcher and now poreda may get a shot at the bigs. He is an actual can't miss prospect

The guy9, he was a can't miss prospect a while ago...now he's a long reliever, maybe back end in the nl. Kenny got a nice backup catcher and now poreda may get a shot at the bigs. He is an actual can't miss prospect

"santos actually has an extremely low babip considering his ld%"

True, true, but I must raise you some small sample size.

I'm going to take the ~900 minor league PAs, where he hasn't had a season with an OPS over .678 (in AA ball) as a better sample of his talent than those 80 MLB PAs with that insane LD%.

But then, I wouldn't mind eating some crow.

Castro will help the chisox. the man def has power and in most catching situations there isnt much more one can ask for. the piazzas mccans and vmarts are few and far between. in the end this trade will hurt us

Eff the Lakers, btw.

"Do I still think it was a mistake to give a pitcher a 7 year contract? Yes. Make however many snide remarks you want, but if you think I am going to concede the point that giving a pitcher a 7 year deal is a bad idea, no matter who the pitcher, after 1.25 seasons into said 7 year deal, I am not. "

It was a 6-year deal.

I don't remember Broadway ever in the same breath as can't miss prospect. He was a "safe" pick by the Sox in the first round. I think he tops out as a 4th/5th starter, maybe will fare a little better in the NL, but he's not all that great. He had a couple of good starts, against the Royals when they were bad though. Still, I don't see why the Sox need another catcher, Corky was doing pretty well as a backup this year.

I cant wait to see Dwight Howard just bulldoze all over gasol odom and bynum. I may hate stephen a smith but "odom and gasol are as soft as wet tissue paper" was a classic line from the 2008 finals. I am so damn tired of these Lakers flags on peoples cars.

anyone have any insight on why the sox did this trade

it jus seems very 1 sided is castro rly that much of a upgrade over Pierzynski

i jus dont see why the sox felt they had to make this trade

I wanna hear scribbles opinion on this trade. all i know is we shoulda gotten beckham for castro.... thats total fair value for a guy who just got repaced by omir freakin santos! damnit this is as frustrated as i could possibly be after a win..

Oh yeah. The Mets are eating the difference between Castro's salary and Broadway's league min salary.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/mets/

"It was a 6-year deal."

Yes, a 6 year deal with an option for 25 million dollars in 2014 that he is already halfway to making a player option. If he wins one CY Young, and finished 2nd or 3rd in any year from 2008-2013, the option vests. He finished in 3rd last year, so if he wins the CY Young this year, or any year during the contract, the option vests. If he finishes better then 3rd two more times, the option vests. I would think two top 3 finishes in the next 5 years, or one win, is pretty likely(especially since right now he would be considered the front runner). So again, keep up the snarky little comments, that is much better then actually taking the 3 or 4 minutes to check up on what you are saying.

According to the tribune, Corky Miller has been DFA and Wes Whisler will be called up.

And Castro will be backing up AJ, not starting in front of him.

nrmax -- ignore it, although i disagree with you (we needed to get santana) your argument is valid. i just feel being a big market team we need to make these types of deals for the best pitcher in baseball

nrmax -- ignore it, although i disagree with you (we needed to get santana) your argument is valid. i just feel being a big market team we need to make these types of deals for the best pitcher in baseball

Arghhhhhh. I wish they would've traded Schneider instead, he's an automatic out at the plate, and his defense isn't that spectacular. And Broadway sucks. They should've at least tried to get a 1B, as SP isn't really much of a big need right now,

Arghhhhhh. I wish they would've traded Schneider instead, he's an automatic out at the plate, and his defense isn't that spectacular. And Broadway sucks. They should've at least tried to get a 1B, as SP isn't really much of a big need right now,

"anyone have any insight on why the sox did this trade

it jus seems very 1 sided is castro rly that much of a upgrade over Pierzynski

i jus dont see why the sox felt they had to make this trade"

Castro wasn't acquired to be an upgrade over AJ.

The starting catcher plays fewer games on average than starting players at other positions.

When considering that Corky Miller should NEVER be allowed another MLB AB, acquiring Castro for a guy who probably won't be more than a middle reliever.

Considering that the Sox have black holes at CF and 3B, maximizing production at C is a good idea.

I understand that. Believe me, I'm glad we have Santana right now. It just annoys me that after one season and 10 starts, people feel like they are justified in gloating that I was wrong. I would love to be wrong. At the time, I wouldn't have made that deal though, and I stick by it, though again I am glad we have Santana and root for him as hard as I can. Everything I say or suggest is what I feel like is best for the Mets in the future and the present, so I would gladly be wrong if it meant the team was successful.

I wouldn't call CF a hole right now. Brian Anderson is hitting better than half of the starters at this point.

Brodway was never can't miss and is a sinker baller. He doesn't strike people out. He is just a guy. No potential!

Yea corky miller is beyong awful.. kw just gave javy to the braves...

And 3B won't be a hole for long, beckham got called up to AAA and is playing third. And viciedo in the long run when beckham moves to the middle infield

Lets see what moving from an AL launching pad to an NL pitchers haven can do for Broadway. Though I won't hold my breath.

KW got Tyler flowers in the vazquez deal...

He could be a solid 5 or decent 4, but I wouldn't hope for much more than that out of him. Recently he's been being used in mop up it seems.

Where is Meddler when I need him!

I need a voice of reason to tell me the best case scenario for Broadway after we lose Castro for Omir (Speed stick!) Santos!!!!

Honestly, this deal makes no sense.

The Mets are eating the salary, so it isn't a salary dump.

They got a former top prospect who probably won't be much more than a middle reliever.

This is just an illogical cleaning of Jerry Manuel's doghouse.

chisox -- wasnt miller in that trade also? or lillibridge?

the Trade was Flowers, Lillibridge and a lower level pitcher. There might have been one other player coming to the Sox, which I think there was, and Boone Logan to the Braves also.

"This is just an illogical cleaning of Jerry Manuel's doghouse."

well said.

metsknicks... yeah Lillibridge was, I'm not sure about Miller. It was Gilmore, Lillibridge, Flowers and one other guy (name is slipping my mind), for Boone Logan and Vazquez, I think.

and logic is generally absent when dealing with manuel and minaya...

If Broadway is even reasonably successful, I cannot even begin to imagine how many ridiculously idiotic jokes, and plays on words about Broadway we are going to subjected to from Gary Cohen. Where has my guy Keith Hernandez been? He must have done something controversial (he is usually good for one or two controversial acts each year), because he has been MIA for almost a week now, which usually means he did something wrong... lol.

Omir Santos:

.276, .306, .474, .780 OPS

5 BB, 14 SO


Ramon Castro:

.253, .322, .430, .752 OPS

8 BB, 16 SO

I'm not a big fan of the trade, but let's stop acting like Castro has been significantly better than Santos.

The downfall of the Mets will not be their backup catcher...

wasnt he drinking during a broadcast or something? maybe that was it... memories of "Major League"

Why are people acting as if Castro is anything special? Hes a serviceable backup catcher with some pop, but nothing over the top.. thats it.. and hes also very injury prone.. im happy we got a guy who was ranked 2nd overall prospect in the CHW organization in 2008.

NM,
he may have been 2 in 08, but he didn't even crack the top 20 this year. I don't think he should have ever been ranked that high

"im happy we got a guy who was ranked 2nd overall prospect in the CHW organization in 2008."

He ranked 2 because 3 of the top 5 guys in the White Sox farm system had just been traded for Nick Swisher.

The system was completely gutted until the '08 draft and the Viciedo signing brought life back to it.

"I'm not a big fan of the trade, but let's stop acting like Castro has been significantly better than Santos."

Again, you are using an 80 at bat sample size, rather then the couple of thousand at bat track records they have both established. Nobody was saying Castro is special, but he has a far better track record then Santos.

@nrmax88 Gary announced on monday that keith had a week vacation. Well his last gm was last week Thursday in LA, so I guess u could b right.

Surprised it was made this quick.

"Considering that the Sox have black holes at CF and 3B, maximizing production at C is a good idea." - Posted by: melonis rex

Beckham has been moved to 3B in AAA ... Fields is on borrowed time. Also, Jordan Danks has been moved to CF at AA and will probably be sharing CF with Anderson soon.

Hey Melonis, do you think this trade means that AJ will be moved?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.