![]() |
|
|
| |
« Astros Agree To Terms With Jiovanni Mier | Main | Odds And Ends: Belliard, Atkins, Ayala »
According to Clark Spencer of the Miami Herald, Matt Lindstrom's injury has prompted the Marlins to start shopping for relievers. Lindstrom will miss at least six weeks and the Marlins, who are a mere 2.0 games behind the division-leading Phillies, don't want to go that long without another arm.
Spencer mentions LaTroy Hawkins and George Sherrill as possible solutions, but says the Marlins wouldn't likely want to give up the players required to land Sherrill. I'll add Luis Ayala and Jon Switzer to the list, as both were just designated for assignment and could be acquired more easily.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
The Cubs need some damn arms too.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 25, 2009 at 09:34 AM
Fish have been playing musical chairs with relievers all season long.. get on back and 2 go back to the DL.. They just cannot get ahead and now, Lindstrom goes down. They just cannot catch a break on DL list for starters, nor relievers and this is with all young pitchers, no old guys on this staff.
Might as well try Ayala, mark Wiley has done wonders and he might be correctable.
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 09:36 AM
Remember fellow Fish fans... This is the same team that let Joe nelson walk because they didn't want to give him 2M+/- this year...
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 09:43 AM
What's does this article have to do with the Cubs???
Is that the same Nelson that's getting beat up in the Rays bullpen?
Posted by: russell | June 25, 2009 at 09:53 AM
"Is that the same Nelson that's getting beat up in the Rays bullpen?"
The same Joe Nelson that Marlin's pitching coach Mark Wiley fixed his delivery on and now with the Rays, he seems to have become lost once again.
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 10:03 AM
Wiley isn't a miracle worker, he couldn't fix Willis, Lindstrom, Nolasco, Sanchez, etc. The guy is just a coach and an average one at that. Marlins saw enough of Nelson to realize he was a one year wonder just like Borowski, Waecther, etc.
Posted by: russell | June 25, 2009 at 10:11 AM
You better check Nelson and what he did for them. Marlins let him go for cost purposes.. NOTHING else.
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Aren't the Rockies looking to trade Huston Street? I think that would be a good option, probably just have to give up some young talent (which we have plenty of). The Marlins have to stop thinking so much about the future and do a few things to improve on the present team while they're still in the race for the pennant
Posted by: xquiles21x | June 25, 2009 at 10:14 AM
Sanchez arm hurt, Nolasco just came back, Willis was excellent in Florida and choked with Detroit, Lindstrom is a decent closer.. What's the point? Not every pitcher is fixable, only some. Wiley is just a better than average pitching coach that can spot problems on some pitchers and correct them.
Like John Farrell in Boston, Rick Adair in Seattle, Dave Duncan in St. Louis.. A few others.
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 10:17 AM
"Wiley isn't a miracle worker, he couldn't fix Willis, Lindstrom, Nolasco, Sanchez, etc. The guy is just a coach and an average one at that. Marlins saw enough of Nelson to realize he was a one year wonder just like Borowski, Waecther, etc."
Why the hell would you use those guys?
Nolasco posted a 3.77 FIP in 212 innings last year, and a 3.78 FIP in 68 innings this year. He didn't deserve to get sent down, and he's been absolutely fantastic for Florida in the past two years.
Willis posted a 2.99 FIP in 236 innings in 2005. He was worth an average WAR of 3.2 from 2003-2007, which is really good, and he was part of a trade that could still bear a lot of talent to Florida.
Matt Lindstrom has a career FIP of 3.29 in 153 innings, and he's proven to be one of their best relievers.
Anibal Sanchez has had trouble with injuries, but he has a 4.71 FIP in his 231 innings in Florida, which is around league average, and he did throw a no-hitter.
Why not list guys that he's actually failed with..?
Posted by: scribbletone | June 25, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Why would the Marlins commit 2 million to a 30 something reliever who hasn't been able to stay on a major league for more then 2 years, guys just don't figure it out at 35.
If Wiley is so great, why does the most talented rotation in NL east have an Era in the middle of the pack.
All those coaches have claimed their with succesful reclamation projects. Who's Wiley's project? Miltre, hendrickson, etc. All failures. Any Wiley success can be traced back to Larry beinfest. Being lucky doesn't make you good.
Posted by: russell | June 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Why would the Marlins commit 2 million to a 30 something reliever who hasn't been able to stay on a major league for more then 2 years, guys just don't figure it out at 35.
If Wiley is so great, why does the most talented rotation in NL east have an Era in the middle of the pack.
All those coaches have claimed their with succesful reclamation projects. Who's Wiley's project? Miltre, hendrickson, etc. All failures. Any Wiley success can be traced back to Larry beinfest. Being lucky doesn't make you good.
Posted by: russell | June 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Honestly scribblestone I'm just shooting from the hip, I'm pretty sure I can make an impressive list of Wiley failures. But that would be too easy.
Posted by: russell | June 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM
LOL Everybody has failures, just like everybody has those guys they know the problem with (Aardsma for example) yet just cannot get it fixed and they move on and all of a sudden, the player realizes wht was being told to them will actually work.
Yes Russell, luck plays a part also.. Is that what u want to hear?
Everybody has failures, just like there are good pitching coaches and horrible pitching coaches that for some reason, managed to hang around for years and years.. Dick Pole comes to mind in that category.
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 11:15 AM
"Honestly scribblestone I'm just shooting from the hip, I'm pretty sure I can make an impressive list of Wiley failures. But that would be too easy."
How about doing it then, just to show me?
Wiley was hired in November of 2007.
He's helped Nolasco, Lindstrom, Johnson, Meyer, Pinto, Calero, Nelson, Volstad, Badenhop and Miller.
He hasn't been great for Sanchez, Kensing, Tankersley, VandenHurk or De La Cruz.
You really can't argue that Wiley has been a negative for them given the direction of their young pitching.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 25, 2009 at 11:32 AM
I think Hawkins and Sampson out of the Stros been are options... while Oakland has a pretty solid core of relievers that may be available like Ziegler or Bailey. The O's have some options while they are in town...
Posted by: B.K. | June 25, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Stanton and a C+ level prospect for Saito
Posted by: snugalicious | June 25, 2009 at 04:07 PM
"Stanton and a C+ level prospect for Saito"
No chance. Fish wouldn't trade this guy for Saito, MDC, or even Ramirez. This is the future slugger they are counting on in a couple of years.
Posted by: johns | June 25, 2009 at 04:37 PM
snugalicious thats the most ridiculous trade proposal ever. Im sorry but we didn't even trade mike stanton for manny ramirez and you think it would be ok to trade him for saito.
Posted by: chris | June 27, 2009 at 02:50 PM
Johns when we first hired mark wiley as the pitching coach it was in 2005 which was dontrelle's best season. Rick krantiz was the coach from 2006 and 2007.
Posted by: chris | June 27, 2009 at 02:53 PM