![]() |
|
|
| |
« Donald Fehr's Legacy | Main | Odds And Ends: Phillips, Mets, Pirates »
According to Andrew Baggarly of the San Jose Mercury News Giants GM Brian Sabean knows what he wants to trade for, he just doesn't expect to acquire anybody until the days leading up to the July 31st trade deadline. Few teams are completely out of the race, so Sabean said he expects a late-developing market.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Go for Gary Matthews Brian, you know you want to! It's your Sebeanistic instinct!
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 10:49 AM
You just know this is going to end up bad.
Posted by: recca | June 23, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Scott Hairston's available (coming off DL today) he can play CF and LF
Posted by: Pads/Angels fan | June 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Don't deal Bumgarner Sabean...don't do it...
Posted by: KG2577 | June 23, 2009 at 10:57 AM
Paul Konerko
Jermaine Dye
Matt Holliday
Aubrey Huff
Luke Scott
Adam Dunn
All players who would make sense for Sabean to acquire.
Dunn might be the best fit, although the defense is a well-known problem.
Still, that's a pretty affordable 50-60 HR over the next year and a half...
Posted by: MorneauVP | June 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Konerko has 5 and 10 rights, he's not going anywhere.
Posted by: RoyHobbs | June 23, 2009 at 11:14 AM
"All players who would make sense for Sabean to acquire."
I'm not sure that the White Sox decide to move Konerko and/or Dye, although I think it could help the team a lot.
I think that there are some other options, outside of Huff, Scott, Dunn, and Holliday.
They could go after Adam LaRoche and/or Freddy Sanchez from the Pirates. They could go after Mark DeRosa and/or Ryan Garko. How about Kevin Kouzmanoff, Adrian Beltre, or Nick Johnson?
Hell, even Garrett Atkins if they want someone on the cheap, at least in terms of talent.
Then again, if he deals away Posey, Villalona, Bumgarner and/or Alderson for any of those guys, then there should be some very angry Giant fans.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 23, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Robothal's Glaus article has me thinking that maybe he could work for SF. He'd be cheaper than some of the other guys, he's a rental you don't mind parting with, he's a likely type-A, and if he's healthy soon, could probably play 1B for the Giants while supplying decent offense. It would be a cheap (taking on some of the salary, or maybe sending back a mid-level prospect) alternative to the Hollidays and Dyes of the world. Probably a reach, though. I think they make the move for Holliday if theyre still over .500 in July.
Posted by: jdbrasher | June 23, 2009 at 11:18 AM
I wonder when the first platoon GM situation will present itself. One guys in charge of scouting, drafting, international signing, the other in charge of trades, free agency, and that stuff. Seems like a ton of guys are very good at one or the other, but not both.
Posted by: nrmax88 | June 23, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Ahhh forgot about Konerko's 5 and 10, good call.
Posted by: MorneauVP | June 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM
I would feel pretty safe putting money on the Giants acquiring Aubrey Huff. Couple decent prospects could do it, one pitcher and a solid corner infielder. Do the Giants have that?
Posted by: colaz | June 23, 2009 at 11:44 AM
What are Holliday' projections playing half his games in san fran looking like?
I can't see him being worth it with boras asking the world in 6 months anyway.
I like Huff and I think the Orioles could match up with McFAIL definently getting the better of the deal.
Is Posey still projected to play catcher with their horrible middle infield?
nrmax you are thinking of what should be known as the Isiah Thomas GM rule regarding roles and power...haha
Posted by: cingular | June 23, 2009 at 11:50 AM
"I wonder when the first platoon GM situation will present itself. One guys in charge of scouting, drafting, international signing, the other in charge of trades, free agency, and that stuff. Seems like a ton of guys are very good at one or the other, but not both."
I've never considered the platoon GM concept before, but I've asked myself many a time why Brian Sabean is still a GM and not a scouting director.
He's shown that he's a brilliant scout, as San Francisco's drafts are routinely among the best in the game. Whenever you have Lincecum, Cain, Sanchez, Bumgarner, Alderson, Sosa, and Wheeler in your organization, you're doing something right.
Then again, he's also shown little ability to make trades (Pierzynski/Hillenbrand/Stanton/Ortiz/Hernandez), and he's handed out some awful contracts to the likes of Rowand, Zito, Morris, etc.
He obviously is great at evaluating young talent, and that's probably what he should stick to.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 23, 2009 at 11:57 AM
I think jermaine dye would be a great addition to our the giants since we wouldnt have to give up one of the top prospects we have I'm assuming since we would take on his contract
and cingular yes posey is still going to be our catcher of the future
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | June 23, 2009 at 11:58 AM
Huff isn't young enough.
I can see the Giants dangling Tim Alderson for a big bat.
Ryan Zimmerman - Nationals
Shin-Soo Choo - Indians (lefty)
Adam Jones - Orioles
Posted by: kraprikorn | June 23, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Huff makes the most sense to me. Except for the one fact that he is an expiring contract.
I'd love to have Holliday if he's willing to talk extension in season.
I think he would be closer to his COL statistics than his OAK statistics at Pac Bell.
Posted by: G4LBB25 | June 23, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Matt Cain for Prince Fielder
Posted by: Lidocaine | June 23, 2009 at 12:06 PM
"Ryan Zimmerman - Nationals
Shin-Soo Choo - Indians (lefty)
Adam Jones - Orioles"
Somebody has high expectations.
There's absolutely no way that the Nationals move Zimmerman or the Orioles move Jones, unless it's for a young stud of similar value, which Alderson is not.
And Choo is a great hitter and one of the more underrated outfielders in the game, so I'm not sure that they would have any interest in moving him.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM
"Ryan Zimmerman - Nationals
Shin-Soo Choo - Indians (lefty)
Adam Jones - Orioles"
Teams rebuilding generally don't trade away center pieces.
Posted by: B3NG4L | June 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM
"Ryan Zimmerman - Nationals
Shin-Soo Choo - Indians (lefty)
Adam Jones - Orioles"
Teams rebuilding generally don't trade away center pieces.
Posted by: B3NG4L | June 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM
lol good joke lidocaine
we are not about to trade the best pitcher in the NL unless its fielder and JJ hardy or fielder and mat gamel
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | June 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM
"He's shown that he's a brilliant scout, as San Francisco's drafts are routinely among the best in the game. Whenever you have Lincecum, Cain, Sanchez, Bumgarner, Alderson, Sosa, and Wheeler in your organization, you're doing something right."
All these guys were 1st rounders... most in the top 10 (hence the bad team record). It's not like they were diamonds in the rough.
Sabean has consistently proven to be one of the worst GMs in baseball. He just gave a 34 year old Edgar Renteria $18.5M over two years after posting a sub .700 OPS season.
He's the worst.
Posted by: carini26 | June 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Konerko's worthless, 10 & 5 rights or not. I thought his last contract was a joke the day it was signed.
If there was EVER a time to do Cain for Fielder, though I deem it unlikely and, to a point, irrational, it would be now, while Cain is pitching as well as he is.
However, with Hall and Hardy sucking, Hart on pace for a .260-20-80 year, and Counsell playing for Weeks, Fielder is the only big Brewers threat outside of Ryan Braun.
The hitting the Brewers actually need is underrated.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Can we stop calling young stars studs?
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 12:40 PM
Krapikorn, At this time, I could only see the Giants dangling Alderson for a huge return. If Sabean is serious about this year, I could only see him trade 1 or 2 mid level prospects for a decent return. None of the Giants top prospects will be traded. Sabean is too afraid of his job to lose another top prospect. I could see an outfield prospect being traded, maybe Andres Torres because we have an abundance. I could see a somewhat top pitching prospect being traded, maybe Pucetas or Sosa but Bumgarner and Alderson will not be traded unless Sabean can make a blockbuster trade.
And what a sight it would be to have Fielder in our lineup. Pablo hitting 3, Fielder hitting 4, Bengie hitting 5. The heaviest 3/4/5 combination ever!
Posted by: sfgiants11 | June 23, 2009 at 12:54 PM
I think Sabean is going for a Dan Uggla, Mark DeRosa, Miguel Tejada, Jermaine Dye type player. Someone who is a salary dump for a non contender while not giving up the young arms. I dont think Johnson is what the Giants need, plus I think he'll stay on the east coast. Fielder is gonna be a FA and a big target for the Giants in the offseason no need to trade for him now.
Posted by: JaCoby Shaddix | June 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM
I think the Giants can aquire Cantu who can play both 3B and 1B. Uggla is not worth it, Fielder is not obtainable. Nick Johnson's bat would die in S.F. Dye would be my next pick to go for. DeRosa, LaRoche, Beltre, would not be good adds. DeRosa might be a good player, but we would end up overpaying. Cantu, Cantu, Cantu
Posted by: NiCage | June 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM
I wouldn't call that a heavy 3/4/5 combination. I'd call it a below-average one.
Fielder won't get the Giants a championship. Several productive players on reasonable contracts will.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM
Villalona would look mighty fine in the green and gold. Sabean?
Now some legit talent flows between the A's and the Giants, instead of speedy AAAA OFers who steal ABs from superior options and SPs with FIPs close to 5.
Posted by: melonis rex | June 23, 2009 at 01:05 PM
Cantu and Holliday arent bad ideas, but they shouldnt require a stud to grab so throw your dreams of Villalona out the door. Fielder wont grab the Giants a championship but sub him for Ishikawa and the Giants are only a game or 2 behind the Dodgers. Too bad the Brewers think they can slide into the postseason this year not gonna happen unless the Rockies/Giants/Cubs drop off or they catch the Cardinals which I dont think is gonna happen.
Posted by: JaCoby Shaddix | June 23, 2009 at 01:12 PM
"I wouldn't call that a heavy 3/4/5 combination. I'd call it a below-average one."
Michael M -
I think he meant literally the heaviest 3/4/5 combination.
Posted by: carini26 | June 23, 2009 at 01:12 PM
the giants should not give up cain unless its for a franchise player deal (like hanley and uggla). I think the fielder + hardy for cain swap will never happen anymore. we should have pulled the trigger when we were offered the cantu for sanchez, but now it seems near impossible to gain any sort of talent for sanchez, seeing as he cant make it past the 4th inning. but im all for holliday. give away a package with Lewis and some young players, Winn will go, move shierholtz to right.
Posted by: BBGiants25 | June 23, 2009 at 01:15 PM
22 year old Pablo Sandoval hitting 336 with an ops of 926? Fielder hitting 299 with 17 home runs, ops over 1000? Bengie, yes his average is slumping, but has 10 homers, tied for #1 in the NL? Wow Michael, you're right, that is way below average......
and with the average weight of 246 lbs, that's massive.
Posted by: sfgiants11 | June 23, 2009 at 01:15 PM
Seriously, imagine Fielder, Sandoval and Molina. Thats alotta pork. They'd hit homers outta necessity of not having to run.
Posted by: JaCoby Shaddix | June 23, 2009 at 01:16 PM
To be honest the Giants need 2 hitters. One needs to be a power bat/home run threat. The other needs to be a Pablo Sandoval type player who can start a rally/be a blasting cap for the lineup. It would cost us a chunk of our farm, or wait till the offseason and Fielder/Hudson will cost a good chunk of $$$.
Posted by: JaCoby Shaddix | June 23, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Cain for Fielder is absolute perfection. Works really well for both teams:
-Giants are loaded with SP depth and are missing a big HR threat
-Brewers can move Braun to 1B
-Giants get a nice bat to compliment Sandoval and soon Posey and Villanoa.
-Brewers get a young rotation anchor who forms a deadly 1-2 with Gallardo
-Prince gets to eat at the finest vegetarian establishments in the country.
Both teams are seriously very close to being contenders for the NL crown, and this deal would be the thing that makes it happen for both teams. They could very well be battling each other in the NLCS, which would add another dimension to it.
Posted by: PL | June 23, 2009 at 01:33 PM
"Seriously, imagine Fielder, Sandoval and Molina. Thats alotta pork. They'd hit homers outta necessity of not having to run."
It would also make them one of the most immobile infields ever when you add Rent at SS.
Fielder obviously had a nice bat, but he's atrocious fielding 1B.
A Sandoval, Rent, Burriss, Fielder infield would give SF pitchers nightmares each night.
Posted by: carini26 | June 23, 2009 at 01:38 PM
nobody gives sandoval any credit for his defense
most people think because he's a heavy guy that he sucks at defense but he moves around like a skinny guy
he's a speedy big man
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | June 23, 2009 at 01:42 PM
@melonis
"Villalona would look mighty fine in the green and gold. Sabean?"
Cmon man, do you steal ice creams from the kids who get off the short bus? Im all for something like this but it would be kind of like stealing and Id feel bad about it.
I think Im gunna go over to the marina and see if ol' Sabes is drinking by himself during the day somewhere, he usually is.
Posted by: PL | June 23, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Sandoval and Molina are not reliable threats. Molina's lifetime average is .276-18-87 with a .308OBP.
This is Sandoval's first season, and that average is not likely to stay up. He's on track for 17 homers and 70 RBI's - wowzers!!!
If you want to really be a threat and top the Dodgers in the NL West or the Cardinals for the Wild Card, you give yourself more insurance than that. Fielder is an excellent hitter, but he's not a one-man team. That 3-4-5 combination is the heaviest in terms of weight alone.
That isn't exactly jumping out at me, gentlemen.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 01:44 PM
Sandoval's first FULL season*
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 01:46 PM
"nobody gives sandoval any credit for his defense
most people think because he's a heavy guy that he sucks at defense but he moves around like a skinny guy
he's a speedy big man"
Granted, it's a SSS at 3B, but Sandoval is currently on pace for a UZR/150 of -7.1...
That ranks him the 7th worst fielding 3B in the game.
Fielder is currently the 4th worst fielding 1B in the game. This is actually better than his '07 (2nd worst) and '08 (2nd worst) seasons.
If you add Fielder and Sandoval with Renteria (6th worst SS) and Buriss (7th worst 2B)...
You have a really crappy infield.
Posted by: carini26 | June 23, 2009 at 02:00 PM
If the Giants want to go for it, go out and get Dunn or Holliday. On top of that, nab a guy like Mark DeRosa, Nick Johnson or Adam Laroche.
I don't know what the Giants farm system is, but if you can pull some of that off and land 2 solid power hitters, then the Giants have a much better shot.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 02:07 PM
"This is Sandoval's first season, and that average is not likely to stay up. He's on track for 17 homers and 70 RBI's - wowzers!!!"
You'll never sound too credible when your argument is based around home runs and RBI's.. and he's actually on pace for 20 HR and 81 RBI, to be fair.
Sandoval has improved his plate discipline a ton in the past two years, and he's a line drive machine.
He never projected to be a monster slugger, his value is mostly tied in the ability to smack line drives into the gaps. He's on pace for 52 doubles and 77 extra-base hits, so it's not like he's slapping singles over the shortstop's head.
His BABIP is high, but that's partially the function of all of the line drives he hits, because he hits the ball square a lot of the time.
And while his defense at third base is below average, it's definitely adequate enough when you have his kind of bat.
And you are making it like their whole lineup would be Sandoval, Fielder and Molina. Rowand, Lewis, Winn, and Renteria are all actually decent hitters as well, even if Renteria is struggling and Winn should have a higher BABIP based on his LD%.
Posted by: scribbletone | June 23, 2009 at 02:09 PM
Pierre wouldn't be a bad idea, either:
Pierre
Rowand
Dunn/Holliday
Winn
Sandoval
Molina
Renteria
Buriss
or:
Rowand
Winn
Dunn/Holliday
Johnson/LaRoche
Sandoval
Molina
Renteria
Buriss
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 02:11 PM
@PL
Cain for Fielder wouldn't really improve the team much though.
The Giants don't really have SP depth though. They have Lincecum/Cain, who are really good, they have Unit, and then they have Sanchez and Zito (Sanchez is outperforming Zito if you realize that Sanchez has an insanely high BABIP), but neither are that good.
Posted by: melonis rex | June 23, 2009 at 02:22 PM
"Granted, it's a SSS at 3B, but Sandoval is currently on pace for a UZR/150 of -7.1...
That ranks him the 7th worst fielding 3B in the game.
If you add Fielder and Sandoval with Renteria (6th worst SS) and Buriss (7th worst 2B)"
I'm starting to feel like some of these old "bird dog" scouts vs. the moneyball geeks when it comes to these types of stats. I can't stand this stat. I've watched every televised Giants game and Sandoval is an average 3B at worst. At 1B he leaves something to be desired, but at 3B he can pick it a little. And Buriss being the 7th worst at 2B??? Are you kidding me??? That is a flawed statistic if it says that Only 6 starting second baseman are worse that Buriss.
Posted by: DegoWop | June 23, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Please, for the love of God, take Adam LaRoche!
Posted by: Ian Smell | June 23, 2009 at 02:42 PM
@melonis
Oh I was talking organizationally and in 2010. I dont think the Brewers or Giants are going to do anything this year, Brewers maybe but Giants no way. But next year....Alderson and Bumgarner are 2010's BA+TC. They also have this dude Surkamp, Giants SP depth is actually better than most teams (but not oaklands ;)
Posted by: PL | June 23, 2009 at 03:02 PM
This past offseason I was hoping that Sabean would've signed two free agent players of whom I thought would contribute to the club. Orlando Hudson and Adam Dunn. And look, they both were good, productive signings. Sabean is a sleeper, and is to hooked on good players from the 90's. He needs to get thrown out and replaced with a young, fresh mind. They way it's been looking these last few years, and I hate to admit it, we should've let Sabean go and held onto Ned Colletti.
Posted by: bigmike23 | June 23, 2009 at 03:03 PM
@DegoWop
I can understand your frustration when it comes to believing in advanced fielding metrics like UZR. One of the major components of UZR is obviously range. The problem with range is that ,for human beings, it is hard to determine which ball hit was a "gettable ball". Another problem lies with positioning. A player may actually have decent range but because his positioning is poor he is unable to get to balls that are deemed playable. Perception is the real killer here. Our eyes can only tell us so much.
Posted by: recca | June 23, 2009 at 03:05 PM
"Cain for Fielder is absolute perfection. Works really well for both teams:"
Giants would be fools to make this trade, need a bat or not and the brewers would jump all over it. Cain is signed for cheap thru 2010 w/6.5M club option for 2011 and King bloat Fielder is a Boras guy and only under team control thru 2011 and only signed thru 2010, plus 2010 contract is at 10M, leading to a super arbitration fight, plus lose him via FA in 2011.
SF needs Cain ,ore than they need Fielder, look for another bat cheaper this year and then sign a FA in the off season, forget giving up 1/2 of one of the best 1-2 punch starting rotations in the game.
Posted by: johns | June 23, 2009 at 03:08 PM
@bigmike23
Yup, Dunn was always going to be the best FA signing no matter what because for some reason a 900+ OPS was undervalued and a 650 OPS was deemed $1M less than a 900+ one. Seriously, this actually happened:
Dunn gets 2/20
Renteria gets 2/18
Mind blowingly dumb move when your team needs a power bat. Hudson was the best 2B option too, no idea why he isnt in SF other than Sabean having no clue what he's doing. Id hate to be a Giants fan and watch this go down.
Posted by: PL | June 23, 2009 at 03:13 PM
@johns
Apparently you go to the bathroom every time the Giants hit, because their offense is beyond pathetic and needs a power hitter more than anything. Your money argument makes no sense because the Giants must have a trillion dollars to work with for the money they give to mediocrity, theyd easily handle whatever arby bump Prince would get.
Also hitters who play 162 games > SPs who pitch every 5. Cain's great but he's not like Johan in his prime, you definitely take the hit because Alderson and Bumgarner are utterly decimating the minors and will probably be with the big league team in 2010, therefore Cain is trade fodder for that 40+ HR 1000+ OPS bat.
It really is completely mindblowing that people dont think an everyday 1000+ OPS bat isnt like, the MOST valuable thing to an offense that currently has 1 good hitter in it.
Posted by: PL | June 23, 2009 at 03:21 PM
Back to the Giants here. I have a big problem with any trade that regards Matt Cain. The only reason the Giants are anywhere near contention is because we are getting phenomenal performances from Cain. Many of you will say "ya but we are getting an upgrade at 1st base".
Cain will probably finish the season with a WAR of 4.0 (2.5 increase). Fielder will probably be around 4.7 WAR (also a 2.5 increase). The problem lies here. If Cain is replaced with a pitcher who produces at a league average level (0.0 WAR) we would be losing out on 2.5 wins for the season. By adding Fielder we would be replacing Ishikawa who we can say will be worth about 1.3 WAR from now until the end of the season.We then subtract Fielder's expected 2.5 WAR from Ishikawa's 1.3. We are left with only a 1.2 increase. So we would actually lose one run (estimated) by losing Cain and adding Fielder.
Posted by: recca | June 23, 2009 at 03:31 PM
Pablo Sandoval is a amazing hitter, and hes only go to get better.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | June 23, 2009 at 03:46 PM
Giants will probably land Laroche, and that's about it.
Posted by: www.homehalfway.net | June 23, 2009 at 04:11 PM
Right now, the Giants are ONLY 5 games above .500 because of Cain and Lincecum. Aside from them and Johnson, they have Zito and Sanchez who are both far from being respectable pitchers right now. If you take away Cain from the rotation and add a question mark in Pucetas, then the Giants have no better than what the Astros have. It'd be one thing if Zito was the pitcher he was 8 years ago or if Bumgarner and Alderson were ready for the bigs, but with the way things are now, the Giants are better off with Cain than Fielder for now and the future.
Posted by: giantsfan18 | June 23, 2009 at 04:28 PM
Cain is one of the top pitchers in the game right now, and he's still younger than Lincecum. Prince Fielder is a good player, but is mostly a hitter. For most teams, pitching is a much more valuable commodity than hitting.
The Giants can get more than Fielder for Cain right now, so why settle for him?
Posted by: strumtrelescent | June 23, 2009 at 04:30 PM
"It really is completely mindblowing that people dont think an everyday 1000+ OPS bat isnt like, the MOST valuable thing to an offense that currently has 1 good hitter in it."
Pitching wins games with some batting support, not Fat fair defensive 1B and Cain at 9-1 and a 2.33 ERA is one of the best young pitchers in the game and cost controlled.
You don't have to go to the bathroom and read those stats PL.. They are obvious to anyone whether a SF fan or not...
Posted by: johns | June 23, 2009 at 04:56 PM
"The Giants can get more than Fielder for Cain right now, so why settle for him?"
Very good point, but I think this trade will never happen for a far more simpler reason than that. And that is...the Brewers are a 1/2 game back of the Giants in the wild card. SF won't just hand over their best pitcher so that the team beneath them in the wild card can make it to the post season.
For that reason alone, SF wont be doing any deals with Milwaukee this year.
Posted by: orangeandblack | June 23, 2009 at 06:19 PM
"Pitching wins games with some batting support, not Fat fair defensive 1B and Cain at 9-1 and a 2.33 ERA is one of the best young pitchers in the game and cost controlled."
Being "Fat" and 1B defense matter more than 1000 OPS and arent worth 20-25 quality starts by a SP?
Okay dude, whatever.
Posted by: PL | June 23, 2009 at 06:36 PM
Yo PL respond to my post, you must have missed it.
Posted by: recca | June 23, 2009 at 08:29 PM
Cain for Feilder is a pipe dream. The only teams that are gonna give up big name players are ones that are either close to, or out of contention, and are looking for prospects to rebuild. We've got prospects, and loads of pitchers. Deal to teams that can't threaten playoff hopes. The A's, Nats, Pirates, O's, maybe even The Mariners. These teams all have valuble players we can use. Go for corner in and out feilders with power.
Posted by: bigmike23 | June 23, 2009 at 09:30 PM
'sabeanistic instinct"
that's priceless
or, actually, if you're a giants fan
that's costly
Posted by: crash | June 24, 2009 at 02:46 AM
PL you're being pretty ridiculous. The Giants aren't trading Cain. End of story. Lincecum and Cain will be together at the front end of that rotation for the foreseeable future and you can talk about Fielders OPS or WAR all you want but the only evidence of the value of that pitching tandem anyone should need is the Giants' fairly unexpected 38-32 record and NL wild card contention despite a lineup filled with a bunch of average at best regulars surrounding Sandoval.
Sabean also takes a beating pretty regularly around these boards and he deserves a ton of it, but he doesn't get nearly enough credit for a pretty incredible recent draft record, the Schmidt trade which brought the team its first real ace since Estes or maybe even Swift, the Jeff Kent trade that kickstarted a new era of Giants baseball, the Roberto Hernandez/Danny Darwin deal that sealed a playoff run, the Matt Morris dump, a couple solidly underrated signings like Ellis Burks, and just generally throwing out a very good product from the mid/late '90s and early '00s. I'm not saying the Zito, Nathan/Liriano-for-AJ, and even Renteria and Rowand moves weren't just plain awful, but everyone acts like he's the worst GM in the league when he's actually pretty average. He's in a pretty tough position as the Giants don't have the kind of money to make fans forget about a Lugo or JD Drew type of questionable signing, but they have enough money that they won't tolerate trading away guys like Haren as soon as they become really good. If you think about it two GMs generally regarded as among the best in the game have a huge advantage over Sabean in that regard. From the time the Giants dropped out of contending for the NL pennant on a yearly basis (2004) until now the A's have won exactly 30 more games than the Giants. You could say thats impressive given their respective payrolls, but its not as though Beane and the A's haven't had some serious talent to work with in that time and you would expect a team that is coming off an era of serious contention to take a few years to rebuild. I'm not a huge Sabean fan, but he gets way too much ignorant criticism.
I could easily see the Giants pursuing one Nick Johnson or Dan Uggla type of bat or perhaps a LaRoche/Sanchez package deal to shore up two weak spots. Lincecum, Cain and Sandoval are all obviously off the table, and Posey, Villalona, MadBum and Alderson aren't going anywhere before the end of the season. Contrary to popular belief that still leaves plenty of attractive options. Merkin Valdez, Sanchez, Pucetas, Sosa and Noonan could all draw some significant attention. If teams aren't willing to offer any quality bats for those guys the Giants will be fine with giving guys like Bowker and Frandsen (who are both tearing up AAA right now) shots at those two holes and saving their prospects and money until the offseason...the fans are so encouraged by the difference they are seeing in the team this year and Pablo, Timmy and Matt are so fun to watch that a playoff appearance, while a huge bonus, isn't necessary this season.
Posted by: thegiantswinthepennant | June 24, 2009 at 05:52 AM