![]() |
|
|
| |
« Roy Halladay Rumors: Sunday | Main | Cafardo's Latest: Jenks, Teahen, Wood, Mulder »
Troy E. Renck has some thoughts on why it doesn't make sense for the Rockies to acquire Roy Halladay if they can't afford to retain his services beyond 2010. In the same piece, he has a few more footnotes:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the two Sanchez's. Its going to be tough to trade J. Sanchez now. Not because he threw a no-hitter, but because of R.J's status and the fact that you can never have enough pitching. The only way I can see them shipping Jonathon is if they believe Sadowski or someone else can step in and fill that role
Posted by: JP | July 12, 2009 at 10:41 AM
I'm very curious to see Jonathan's next start. They talked about a change in his mechanics. So far so good...lets see if this was just a one time deal or if it actually will make him better.
The no no was still FUN. Made me a little teary :)
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 12, 2009 at 10:44 AM
J Sanchez AND a prospect ? Please. I woudln't trade J for F straight up.
Lefties with 96 mph fastballs and one of the best sliders in MLB don't grow on trees. Either ask for the moon and if you don't get it it's not the worst thing in the world to see how he pans out next several starts.
Posted by: kinsler5 | July 12, 2009 at 10:47 AM
I don't see the Giants dealing any of there starters. Cain took a shot off his right elbow last night. He should be ok but probably won't pitch in the all star game. Neukom is on record as saying they like the team they have, but will add payroll/trade for the right guy. It won't be for any of there top 4 or 5 prospects.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 12, 2009 at 10:54 AM
Freddy is a nice player and would be a good addition, but he's not the big stick that they need. They need a guy to stick in the middle of the line-up who has some pop.
Posted by: JP | July 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM
I agree, Sanchez is definately not the middle-of-the-order bat they need. Someone as in Matt Holliday or Vernon Wells could be. Though Wells is struggling, he may benefit from a change of scenary.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 11:08 AM
I think Jonathan Sanchez is one of those players who's almost impossible to trade. Just looking at his stats, he's not a great pitcher, but he has too much potential to give up on. That makes teams unwilling to give up too much for him, and the Giants won't settle for a weak package for him. He obviously shown with his no hitter what he can do when he can control his electric stuff.
Also, there's been a lot of pretty dumb Halladay proposals. Maybe the Rockies would have an outside shot, but it wouldn't make sense to trade a cost-controlled young starter plus prospects for him. Same with them talking about Kershaw. While that would be great for Toronto, it kinda defeats the purpose of adding to your major league rotation for the team who gets him.
Posted by: bigpat | July 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Jonathan Sanchez and Randy Winn for Matt Holliday?
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Kevin Pucetas, Ryan Sadowski and a PTNL for Freddy Sanchez. I would want to see how Sanchez does AFTER a no hitter to see if he can be a 15 game winner when he develops.
Posted by: Giantsguy1987 | July 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Vernon Wells?? With that contact?? NO WAY!!!
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 12, 2009 at 11:15 AM
With the Blue Jays eatin some $$$ of course
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Sanchez may not be a great pitcher stat wise, but that does'nt stop teams from asking for him. This is'nt new. Like Cain, teams have been asking for Sanchez for the last two or three years, so there must be something they see in him. Is Sanchez going to fetch a Holliday or another heavy bat by himself? No. But he could be part of a package that could. I'd rather he go that way than just for Freddy Sanchez
Posted by: JP | July 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Vernon Wells is just not worth it, period. Even if he's free.
Posted by: Giantsguy1987 | July 12, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Wells for Zito?
Posted by: Devmac | July 12, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Hahahahaha At this point i'd rather have Zito. His contract is worth less money.
Posted by: Giantsguy1987 | July 12, 2009 at 11:20 AM
Fortunately, front office personnel are not fickle like fans. That was a great game Sanchez threw the other night. But he still has a body of work to go by. One outing does not increase his trade value that much in the eyes of those who count. Just like Freddy and Jack have more value to the Pirates then they do anyone else. The Pirates won't give either away at least I hope they don't. Right now they are the glue that's holding the wobbly ship up in Pittsburgh. It would be scary to think what the Pirates would be without Jack and Freddy up the middle unless replacements are acquired.
Posted by: indybucfan | July 12, 2009 at 11:24 AM
What about Alex Rios? He may be able to be had as well.
Posted by: JP | July 12, 2009 at 11:26 AM
"One outing does not increase his trade value that much in the eyes of those who count"
------------------------------------------------------------
I most certainly agree.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 11:26 AM
well He may be making Less but Wells is also hitting .359 this month. Not saying he is worth his contract or anything but he won't look so horrible by the end of the year. Wells always manages to get the same production despite a couple horrible months.
Posted by: Devmac | July 12, 2009 at 11:28 AM
I wonder if there is some sort of deal that could be done in a Halladay + Wells for Zito and prospects.
Posted by: Devmac | July 12, 2009 at 11:34 AM
I still would rather have Sadowski than Sanchez.
That said, Sanchez for Sanchez straight up would be the more fair deal
Posted by: Thee4stringking | July 12, 2009 at 11:34 AM
Why would you even mention Jermaine Dye in rumors? Look at his stats, he was snubbed of an all-star appearance. Not only that, but the White Sox are 2 games back. Why would they give up a projected 40hr 100rbi player when your two games back? The only way i would ever trade Dye is for Cain and that would never happen.
Posted by: ChiSoxKilla23 | July 12, 2009 at 11:41 AM
"I still would rather have Sadowski than Sanchez."
Have you seen Sadowski's stuff? Once they get a decent scouting report on the guy he's going to get ROCKED.
Keep sanchez
Posted by: Giantsguy1987 | July 12, 2009 at 11:44 AM
The Sanchez for Sanchez boat has already sailed with Cain taking a ball off his throwing elbow, Johnson out for a bit and a murderous second half schedule. Forget Jonathon & a prospect for a 31 year old with tweaky back that is the product of way too many paint fumes in a closed room .
Braves NLeast: Wells with his Zito like contract and will be 31 next year? No thanks. If the Giants’ are going to do a wages relief package for a Jays Of it should be Rios. And I am not holding my breathe there.
****
ChiSoxkilla: In the NL a hitter still has to play the field. Dye is not good at that any more. Once he leaves those smaller parks in the AL Centeral and has to play the larger out fields in the NL West he will look extreamly ugly.
Posted by: daveinexile | July 12, 2009 at 11:46 AM
amazing to read some bloggers comments. Wells contract is worse than Zito's right now. Giants need a hitting OF. Doesn't have to be a power guy, tho it would be great. Weeks ago, J for F would have been feasible, but RJ out and Cain a ? for a little while, makes dealing J. Sanchez a little harder. Rios on the cheap would be best for the G men.
Posted by: mib | July 12, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Trading J. Sanchez for Freddy Sanchez would be poor use of an assett in my opinion. Freddy would be an upgrade at 2b but would do little to address the Giants need for a middle of the order bat to help this year. I would think they could flip J. Sanchez to Baltimore for Luke Scott. B'more gets a top SP who they can afford to sit on and figure things out while the Giants get a power bat they stick in LF/RF/1B and can control for another 2 years or so?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Jonathan Sanchez and Randy Winn for Matt Holliday?
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 11:13 AM
---------------
They can get a better deal than that, even if it were just for prospects.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 12, 2009 at 11:54 AM
"The Giants are "lukewarm" on Matt Holliday but like Jermaine Dye. Brian Sabean recently defused rumors involving Dye."
Does Sabean not understand defense and park adjusted stats? Holliday is having a down year, but he's still a very good hitter when considering park factors AND a very good fielder. I take him over Dye every day, especially in the NL.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 12, 2009 at 12:03 PM
If you saw Sadowski pitching his last start, you'd understand that even though Sanchez can either be really good or really bad, he's still better than a guy who was never meant to be called up.
Posted by: def4m | July 12, 2009 at 12:04 PM
To get Holliday I think the Giants would have to give up Alderson and Noonan. I just don't see them doing that for a rental.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 12, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Rex: I would have to do some digging but I think, if memory serves, Holiday had few less than complementary remarks about playing in SF. If - big IF - that is so it would explain Sabean’s cold shoulder today him. Else Sabean is just trying to haggle the asking price down. those are the only semi logical things I can think of any ways for his attitude.
Posted by: daveinexile | July 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM
melonis: Aren't the Giants looking for a power hitter? Dye isn't as horrible in RF as people think. He'll never be mistaken for a GG but I think they'll gladly take what he gives them in the field if he can deliver the pop that they need. Right now Holliday's 8 hrs (4 @ home, 4 on the road) simply isn't enough compared to Dye's 20. He's on pace to put up really good middle of the order numbers.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM
"Does Sabean not understand defense and park adjusted stats? Holliday is having a down year, but he's still a very good hitter when considering park factors AND a very good fielder. I take him over Dye every day, especially in the NL."
Sabean understands that Holliday's contract is up after this year, and he's stated that he doesn't want a rental.
Posted by: richard.cordrey | July 12, 2009 at 12:11 PM
YanksFan: I like what you thinking but I think the Giants would have to kick in a little bit more for equal value purposes. Given current conditions I think philosophic exercise for the next couple months though.
Posted by: daveinexile | July 12, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Yanks Fan: R.F. in S.F. is a whole different beast. It will expose fielder’s flaws very fast.
Posted by: daveinexile | July 12, 2009 at 12:17 PM
"If you saw Sadowski pitching his last start, you'd understand that even though Sanchez can either be really good or really bad, he's still better than a guy who was never meant to be called up."
What are you talking about in his last start? The 6+ IP and only 2 ER... Yeah, seems like a loser to me. /sarcasm off
Sadowski has got some decent stuff and great control.
Posted by: richard.cordrey | July 12, 2009 at 12:18 PM
I think Holliday's value is way over inflated right now. No way should he command a top 5 prospect. What is he doing exceptionaly well other than posting a nice obp and playing good defense? It seems that may A's followers are offering him as if he were plating 2008 stats or hedging that he will have a tremendous 2nd half. That's a risky proposition for anyone to think he'll explode after the all-star break. I could see a team offering more if he were under contract for another year and could rebound but for a 3 month rental? Pass on offering anything close to Tim Anderson plus others.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | July 12, 2009 at 12:18 PM
My mistake, Sadowski only got 5IP in his last start... Still wasn't a bad game though. 5H, 2ER.
Posted by: richard.cordrey | July 12, 2009 at 12:28 PM
At this point the best of Sadowski equals a few weeks of ’02 Ryan Jensen. Savor it. Enjoy it. Recognize it.
Posted by: daveinexile | July 12, 2009 at 12:36 PM
In Sadowski's three games he gave up 2 earned runs in 18 innings to three pretty good hitting teams in Mil, Hou & Fla. All translating to a 1.00 ERA. Not saying he's ready to become a permanant fixture, but it ain't bad for a guy "who was never meant to be called up" and certainly better than alot of other teams pitching call-ups
Posted by: JP | July 12, 2009 at 12:37 PM
Personally I don't think the Giants are going to do anything, sure they raise the brow about certain players, but mostly I think it's outside speculation. From a Stategic point of View if Sabeans going to sit back and let the players develope while building chemistry maybe it wouldn't be a bad Idea to go get Halladay. 3 #1 starters in your Rotation. Beat that!!! Lincecum, Cain and Halladay should at LEAST get you to the Championship!!!
Posted by: seanyt1 | July 12, 2009 at 12:43 PM
"Aren't the Giants looking for a power hitter? Dye isn't as horrible in RF as people think. "
He's awful defensively. On pace to be worth -11 runs in RF this year. The Giants are looking for a power hitter, but they have to look at defense as if they don't, he'll just give a lot of that power back. Holliday and Dye have both been 1.8 WAR players this year. Dead even.
"Sabean understands that Holliday's contract is up after this year, and he's stated that he doesn't want a rental."
As is Dye's, as that option is a massive overpayment for Jermaine's services. And Dye is much more likely to accept arbitration than Holliday, which means no draft picks. Older and has a track record of being an awful, awful defender.
"No way should he command a top 5 prospect."
I agree with this. I said nothing about Alderson, someone else brought that up.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 12, 2009 at 12:43 PM
Melonis
What do you think it'll take for the Giants to get Holliday.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 12, 2009 at 12:51 PM
JP: Hence the ’02 Ryan Jensen name drop. ( http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=jensery01&year=2002&t=p ) He was key part of the ’02 team making it to the post season and had some very nice outings that year. ( http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.cgi?n1=jensery01&t=p&year=2002 ) Only to be swallowed up by the sands of time after that magical season.
Posted by: daveinexile | July 12, 2009 at 12:52 PM
I take Uribe over any F.A./Trade at 2b... Unless of course were talking Renteria for a 2b then obviously you slide Uribe in the SS pos., but that would never happen after just acquiring Rent. last offseason...
Posted by: seanyt1 | July 12, 2009 at 12:56 PM
I wonder if the Giants would trade Winn and Sanchez or the Big Legowski (whatever his name is) for Dye
There are so many factors that go into a trade - thats why a lot never happen.
Posted by: TripleHHH | July 12, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Any OF the Giants pick up would play LF..
Winn/Schierholtz are too valuable in RF to test anyone else...
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM
I don't see the Giants trading J. Sanchez at this point. Dumping a fastball like that can't do anything but come back to bite you. What about a package of sadowski, bowker and frandsen for Freddy Sanchez?
Posted by: Tyler | July 12, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Also, please no Jermaine Dye. Holiday? Sure, if the price is right and he re-signs, but who knows? I feel like Ishikawa is really getting his feet under him and could be primed for a huge 2nd half. At that point we could keep our team mostly intact and still make the playoffs, though the addition of Freddy Sanchez I would still love, just not at the cost of J.
Posted by: Tyler | July 12, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Dye makes the most sense for this team. He is the most consistent 30-100 guy that we can get. Chicago wantss to get rid of Dye because they dont want to pay him this year and his option next year, however even though Chi knows they cant make the playoffs and win, only being 2.5 games back the fans would revolt. Chi also wants to move Konerko. The giants need to stand pat until they get middle of the order guy. Getting Sanchez now makes little sense for us until it is clear they are going all in for the WS.
Posted by: chonged500 | July 12, 2009 at 01:48 PM
I think the Giants should wait to trade Sanchez and see how he pitches in his next few starts. Sanchez looked like a totally different starter in friday's no-hitter. He has more velocity in his fastball, more spin to his curveball, and more importantly had more confidence in himself. Let him work more with Righetti and be around pitchers like Lincecum, Cain, and Johnson to see how they suceed in the game. If he continues to pitch the way he is, the Giants will have a truely nasty rotation come playoff times.
Posted by: It's Giant's Time! | July 12, 2009 at 01:49 PM
Also Dye isnt the best OF but hes not the worst not to mention having Rowand, Nate, winn, Torres gives the giants some defensive leeway.
Posted by: chonged500 | July 12, 2009 at 01:50 PM
Can anyone send me a link to view Halladays stats at May Field? I have a feeling his career numbers there are not so great, thanks.
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Sorry at&t Park
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Standtall
Here's the link. Holliday's OPS+ is 63 in 200 AB'S
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=hollima01&year=Career&t=b
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 12, 2009 at 02:15 PM
@ Tyler
Ishikawa doesn't need a great second half to be valuable to the Giants. If he can put up average first baseman numbers, that great defense he can give will be more than enough.
I actually thought if you put him in the 3 spot in front of Sandoval, he might get some better pitches, if he works the count better.
Posted by: Giantsguy1987 | July 12, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Any OF the Giants pick up would play LF..
Winn/Schierholtz are too valuable in RF to test anyone else...
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM
Err, you mean Winn and Rowand. Nate is a stiff evryday guy. At the best he's a 4th OF/PH Double switch guy.
Posted by: mib | July 12, 2009 at 02:40 PM
The Giants are 10 games over .500, scoring plenty of runs and somehow even hitting the long ball. They've got pitching in the minor leagues to account for Cain's bruised right arm and even for Johnson's shoulder injury. There's no reason to make a deal just to add a little run production in the middle infield or pick up a corner outfielder in the walk year of his contract. If they could land F. Sanchez for a batch of mid-level prospects like the Braves packaged for McClouth...OK. If they can sign Holliday or Dye to a longer deal...they'd need to address the small, unspoken problem of fouling up the chemistry of a team playing better than anyone expected. Rumor mill's no place to really get into 25 guys playing hard, playing well, etc. ... and how benching a middlin' outfielder like Schierholtz to make room for Dye could potentially muck up the works. The Giants don't have the talent to be 10 games over .500...but, they're 10 games over .500...so, adding talent for talent's sake might not be the right thing to do right now.
Posted by: T Sill | July 12, 2009 at 02:47 PM
MaysField,
Thanks, those #'s aren't bad, thanks for the link... Sanchez and a tier 2 prospect for Holliday, I would try it out.
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 03:33 PM
as long as we could lock him in for a couple of years
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 03:34 PM
If the Pirates Traded Freddy for Jonathan plus a prospect, Im fairly sure NH would be run out of town on the band of lies he would be blamed of.
tbh, I dont even want J Sanchez. He would have been a nice buy low throw in piece, but not now. For some reason SF fans are suffering from the common disease of overvaluing your hometown players.
J Sanchez's entire body of work is what his value is based on, not his last start. So with that being said, keep him. Demand too much NH, and hold your ground...someone will overpay.
Posted by: Dempsey | July 12, 2009 at 04:06 PM
"Err, you mean Winn and Rowand. Nate is a stiff evryday guy. At the best he's a 4th OF/PH Double switch guy."
Err...Rowand doesn't play RF. People here talk about Dye as if he would play RF. Winn/Schierholtz have RF on lockdown now. I disagree with you about Nate. His defense and cannon arm are of definite value in our park.
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 12, 2009 at 04:17 PM
I think freddy sanchez going to the giants is a start . If they want to make it to the second season they need a power hitter other than sandoval and molina. If they can get like a nick johnson and a another heavy hitter like vernon wells for jonathan sanchez and move vernon to center rownad to left and winn to right then th order is
Juan uribe
edgar renteria
vernon wells
nick johnson
pablo sandoval
bengie molina
aaron rowand
randy winn
pitcher
Then the giants would be unstopable
Posted by: frank bob | July 12, 2009 at 04:41 PM
Dempsey,
I dont blame you for not wanting J. Sanchez based on his work thus far, it's very conservative/safe for Pirate fans to feel that way. For Giants fans, I don't think we should jump the gun either with our starting rotation in limbo, plus I want to see his next few starts, if 57 can stay consistent with his mechanics, I think Pirate fans will be kicking themselves, maybe... just maybe, he's finally becoming the pitcher we all know he can be, we'll see in the 2nd half hopefully! (god zito sucked ba1Ls today, 450k per start.... uhh)
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 04:46 PM
"Dye makes the most sense for this team."
Dye fits into the NL like a hook fits into an eye.
A fish hook.
An open eye.
Great bat still, absolutely brutal glove.
"Dye isnt the best OF but hes not the worst.."
Yes. Dunn is the worst. But just because Dunn's glove makes my eyes bleed doesn't make Dye's anything other than brutal.
"If the Pirates Traded Freddy for Jonathan plus a prospect, Im fairly sure NH would be run out of town on the band of lies he would be blamed of."
Pure homer-ism, just like the ZOMG Don't Touch Jonathan SF fanboys. Freddy is a steady 2-4 WAR player. Jonathan is an unsteady, risky, 2-to-N WAR Player. Even in 2009, his "bad" year, he's +1 WAR already YTD. And he's cheaper. If the Giants didn't have Randy Johnson's shoulder and Matt Cain's elbow about which to worry, this would be a win-win straight-up swap. Instead, it will never happen, because Sabean needs pitching.
Sabean is probably (and rightly) trying to acquire Freddy. He is probably (and rightly) taking major-league arms off the table. As a result, I doubt a transaction happens.
Posted by: wcw | July 12, 2009 at 04:49 PM
55saveslives is correct, I wouldn't want Dye in RF, Nate and Winn are far better suited for RF, Nate is an assassin out there!
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 04:50 PM
Dye reminds me of Bonds in his 40's trying to play D, We have great speed and fielding with what we have out there, excluding Lewis.
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 12, 2009 at 04:53 PM
It must suck to be a Pittsburgh Pirate. The reason behind this is you know as a good player who makes a good bit of money, you're chances of staying there are slim to none. This must be a stressful time for Sanchez and LaRoche. Mainly LaRoche because he must come to terms with the fact that he may not be playing alongside his brother too much longer.
Posted by: Braves for NL East!! | July 12, 2009 at 05:59 PM
Err...Rowand doesn't play RF. People here talk about Dye as if he would play RF. Winn/Schierholtz have RF on lockdown now. I disagree with you about Nate. His defense and cannon arm are of definite value in our park.
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 12, 2009 at 04:17 PM
Nate has nothing locked down, thats why Bowker is up. The only locks in the Giants OF iw Winn and Rowand. They stuck with F.Lewis so long 'cause they know Nate is not a starting OF for them.
Posted by: mib | July 12, 2009 at 09:07 PM
They stuck with F.Lewis so long 'cause they know Nate is not a starting OF for them.
Posted by: mib |
I don't completely agree with this. I think they wanted to see what they had in F lewis after he made strides last year. Remember Lewis got off to a smokn' hot start then went cold as ice.
Nate is very good in RF and lewis is a butcher in LF. The Giants now know Lewis is not the long term answer in LF. Lewis is purely a PH now. Bowker will take Lewis's spot not Nate's. The Giants will live with a RF with an OPS+ of 100 in RF with great defense.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 12, 2009 at 09:57 PM
If we could acquire Freddy without giving up Jonathan, Alderson, or any off our top prospects, i'd be happy
Posted by: LinCycum | July 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM
If we're going to trade away prospects or even Sanchez for a second baseman, than I think it should be Uggla. 1)We fill a gaping hole in our infield 2)We solve the power hitter situation. Imagine the lineup with him rather than F Sanchez. Power hitting homerun hitters put fans in seats.
Posted by: bigmike23 | July 12, 2009 at 10:35 PM
Bigmike
Right now the Marlins are still in the hunt. Unless they fall out of contention the next 3 weeks they probably won't trade Uggla.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 12, 2009 at 11:35 PM
There is no way Sabean stays with Nate starting. If any Giant fan, and I am, thinks were going to make it with Nate, you're plain crazy. The guy swings at pitches that hit him. Must find an OF soon. Watch.
Posted by: mib | July 13, 2009 at 12:15 AM
Well mib, you are entitled to your opinion. I still disagree.
Yes Nate has trouble with the inside pitch...as does Ishikawa...as does DUSTIN PEDROIA.
Kevin Kouzmanoff swung at a pitch that hit him this weekend too! He is a starter.
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 13, 2009 at 12:42 AM
so kinsler 5 well just see how sanchez pithches next wont we
Posted by: dodgersuck95 | July 13, 2009 at 12:48 AM
mib
Winn's OPS+ 87, Nate's 94. Winn's a very good defender, so is Nate, but Winn has lost a step. Your right this team needs a righthanded power hitting outfielder. Nate will lose the AB's. That we can agree upon.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | July 13, 2009 at 02:17 AM
Do the giants really need a power hitter? I would say they need people to get on, aside from panda and rowand no one is even close to .300, at least not enough at bats to qualify. What they need is runners to be on for panda and molina. did anyone actually think panda would have 15hr's at the break? I didnt, i thought he'd be a .300+ hitter with 15-20hr's tops for the year. He has a chance at 30+ hr's, they would score more if there were actually guys on to drive in. Acquiring sanchez would be an upgrade, not only at 2b but for the offense. Jonathan has been inconsistent this year while freddy has played good all year. rowand leadoff, sanchez second, panda third, molina fourth, they're bound to score for sure. and the giants are 24-0 when allowing fewer than 2 runs. With this pitching staff and bullpen (except howry) the giants can win playing small ball. Get real, does anyone want to be like the phillies (this year), hitting a bunch of hr's, and their pitching sucks. Acquring a big bat will demand more than jonathan, meaning cain and we certainly don't want to do that. Giants need to bring in guys that can hit .300 or very close to that and go small ball. panda will likely end up with 25-30 hr's while htting over .300 and molina can add another 20+. The way i see it is cain and lincecum are untouchable, anyone else is game
Posted by: dodger$uck!!!! | July 13, 2009 at 03:31 AM