![]() |
|
|
| |
« Marlins Sign Brendan Donnelly | Main | Wedge & Staff Staying Put »
Andrew Baggarly of the San Jose Mercury News says Brian Sabean quelled rumors of the Giants interest in Jermaine Dye and Victor Martinez, referring to each as "pie in the sky." Last month it was rumored that the Giants were scouting both.
Baggarly quoted Sabean saying V-Mart would require "a (Madison) Bumgarner-plus type of blockbuster deal. And that's not going to happen because we're not going to trade Bumgarner."
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Vmart would be great but tooo expensive.
With the way the team is playing, an Uggla or similiar bat is what they should pursue.
Posted by: 55saveslives | July 05, 2009 at 11:09 AM
Agreed... Patients is key in 09, in all honesty I love this season, but it's not time to trade away the future
Posted by: standtallyourgiants | July 05, 2009 at 11:16 AM
Stop saying Uggla is a good option... He's batting .222 with no power. Not what the Giants need. They need a Teahen/Sanchez type guy.
Posted by: richard.cordrey | July 05, 2009 at 11:44 AM
Wait you don't want Dan Uggla but want Freddy Sanchez OR Mark Teahen... why?
Uggla is better defensively than both of those two.
He's on schedule to hit as many HR's as last year, and he's walking more and striking out less.
His BA & OBP are quite a bit down yes but they don't figure to stay that way all season.
I feel like I constantly have to defend Dan Uggla on here...but whatever I'm not going to argue with someone who wants a light hitting 3B as their 2B, or an aging one trick pony(Admittedly its a decent trick)who is earning $8 mil next year instead of a young-ish, team controlled all star.
V-Mart would cost too much, and Dye isn't the answer.
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 05, 2009 at 11:57 AM
WAIT A SEC DID U JUST SAY DAN UGGLA HAS BETTER DEFENCE THAN SANCHEZ AND Teahan???
YOU HAVE 2 BE JOKING DID U WATCH THE ALL-STAR GAME LAST YEAR???
Ok heres the deal at 2nd base out of those 3 guys it gos like this for defence:
sanchez
uglla
teahen
BUT TEAHEN AND SANCHEZ HAVE FLEXABILLITY TEAHAN CAN GO WERE EVER U NEED HIM 2[just not pitcher,catcher]. And Sanchez could play 2nd and 3rd. One Last thing HOW MANNY ERRORS DID DAN UGLLA HAVE IN THE ALLSTAR GAME??? NL LOST BC OF HIS ERRORS!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Wrigleyterror37 | July 05, 2009 at 12:25 PM
*Sigh*
Of course one game is indicative of a persons game.
Hey Carlos Delgado once hit 4 HRs in a game, he should be a highly sought after FA this off season he figures to hit 648 HRs in the regular season next year.
Please people can you actually check UZR and range factors before posting drivel inspired by that one game you saw last year.
Dan Uggla has a good glove he is just lacking range because of his bulky build. UZR rates him as a slightly above average defender... only slightly but above average nonetheless.
Oh yeah...
YOU DON'T NEED TO SHOUT!!!
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 05, 2009 at 12:40 PM
"OU HAVE 2 BE JOKING DID U WATCH THE ALL-STAR GAME LAST YEAR???"
Wow. yea. uggla sucks because he played bad in the all star game last year. he sucks. release him.idiot.
the all star game is a joke.
Posted by: lincecum4cy | July 05, 2009 at 12:53 PM
Yes, Wrigleyterror37, please stop posting in all caps. I know I dont even read your posts because of it, and I imagine many are in the same boat. Posting like that just means most people are going to ignore you - leaving no point in posting to begin with. You will help everyone, including yourself, by hitting the caps-lock.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 05, 2009 at 01:16 PM
"Uggla is better defensively than both of those two."
Now, I'm going to disagree with this, but I definitely will not use the All Star Game as part of my argument. I don't think that I would ever use the All Star Game to argue anything regarding the value of a player.
Sanchez is definitely a superior defensive player to Uggla, although Uggla is easily better than Teahen, who is horrid at second and below average at third.
Uggla has a career UZR/150 of -3.0 at second base, and he's never played an inning anywhere else on the field in his major league career.
Sanchez has a career UZR/150 of +4.1 at second base in a similar number of innings, and his UZR/150 at third base is a sparkling +17.9 in 172 games there.
But then again, Uggla did make three errors in the ASG, so obviously his defensive work is a joke.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 05, 2009 at 01:18 PM
It was clear that the Giants were not looking at V-Mart or Dye at that game. Dye don't fit, V-Mart would cost too much, and probably wasn't available anyhow.
I thought that the Giants were looking at MI options because both teams have a number of buy-low possibilities, Barfield, Jhonny, Betemit.
Posted by: obsessivegiantscompulsive | July 05, 2009 at 01:31 PM
It was clear that the Giants were not looking at V-Mart or Dye at that game. Dye don't fit, V-Mart would cost too much, and probably wasn't available anyhow.
I thought that the Giants were looking at MI options because both teams have a number of buy-low possibilities, Barfield, Jhonny, Betemit.
Posted by: obsessivegiantscompulsive | July 05, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Good they're not dealing Baby Bum. The kid is obviously special, in my opinion he's better than Cain and Sanchez and will be their number 2.
Why not deal Alderson though? I know his value isn't as high as Baby Bum, but he's still a top 50 prospect in most rankings. But Alderson is also very special with his terrific control.
Now they won't deal Romo or Hinshaw, they're effective MLB pen pieces... Well maybe not Hinshaw this year but he did have a great run last year.
How about Henry Sosa though? They don't really have room for him unless they deal Sanchez. He's not as good as Alderson or Baby Bum but he's still very good. Guys like Nick Noonan, Darren Ford, Conor Gillespie, etc... could be packaged with him to form a very good package.
Posted by: baseball52 | July 05, 2009 at 01:37 PM
The Giants have a good farm system, one of the few perks of the Sabean regime is that he's a fantastic scout, so they can probably form a pretty impressive package without including any of the big 4 (Villalona, Bumgarner, Posey, Alderson).
As baseball52 said, guys like Henry Sosa, Nick Noonan, Conor Gillespie, Ehire Adrianza, Clayton Tanner, Scott Barnes, Rafael Rodriguez, and Brandon Crawford, among others, could form a pretty nice trade offer.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 05, 2009 at 01:47 PM
I'd not looked at Freddy Sanchez's career UZR I just looked at last years -1.8 and I guess I jumped to conclusions.
Freddy is a +17.9 defender at 3B wow, I am genuinely impressed. I could put up with his low power at 3B with D like that.
I agree the Giants top 4 should be untouchable but they should try to deal some of the others for long term offensive solutions.
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 05, 2009 at 02:08 PM
Even Denker still has some good value.
Holliday could even be an option, although I don't think he'd fit that park, with a Sosa based deal.
Now I doubt they're shopping him, but Shin Soo Choo would be great for the Giants. Considering the Indians need for pitching and how many talent OF specs they have, LaPorta, Weglarz, Crowe, and Brantley, you could also add the worse fielder of the Mills-Hodges combo to that list because they could possibly be moved to the OF, and they have Big Grady.
Posted by: baseball52 | July 05, 2009 at 02:20 PM
With a UZR of +17.9, Sanchez would be stealing homeruns down the LF line, wouldn't he?
Geez...
Posted by: venn177 | July 05, 2009 at 02:22 PM
And I mean that in a could, non-sarcastic way. That's crazy. Whoever gets him needs to move him back to third.
Posted by: venn177 | July 05, 2009 at 02:23 PM
I know I'm still in awe, in theory he is a better 3B defender than Evan Longoria.
Gulp
Posted by: OhPityMe | July 05, 2009 at 02:25 PM
I think that people still need to put the statistic into perspective.
Yeah, 172 games is a pretty decent sample size, but UZR is a statistic that depends on large sample sizes because small samples can GREATLY fluctuate.
Obviously, with a +17.9 UZR/150 in 172 games, you can surmise that Sanchez is a very good defensive third baseman.
But is he really better than Longoria, who has a +17.5 UZR/150 in 190 games, and is regarded as essentially the consensus best third baseman in the game?
It's difficult to say just how good Sanchez is at third base going forward, but in those 172 games, Sanchez was at a Longoria/Rolen level of production defensively, which is kind of astounding.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 05, 2009 at 02:48 PM
I'm a huge fan of acquiring Sanchez, and now even more so after hearing about that ridiculous UZR at 3B. They could put him at 2B for the rest of the year and have a lot of flexibility in chasing a big bat next offseason.
They could let Molina walk, move Sandoval to C part time, and pursue a 2B or move Freddy to 3B and pursue another middle IF hitter (Hardy?) or simply leave everyone where they are and pursue a bigger bat at 1B or a corner OF spot. Sanchez isn't likely to cost the Giants one of their top 4 prospects and he just seems like the perfect trade target.
Posted by: thegiantswinthepennant | July 05, 2009 at 02:52 PM
"The Giants have a good farm system, one of the few perks of the Sabean regime is that he's a fantastic scout, so they can probably form a pretty impressive package without including any of the big 4 (Villalona, Bumgarner, Posey, Alderson)."
Can we please stop calling Sabean a "fantastic" scout? All of these guys were high first round picks or international free agents... something Sabean leaves to his Latin scouts.
Bottom line - this is a guy who has lead the Giants to 4 consecutive 76 wins or worse seasons in what is widely accepted as the worst division in baseball... crappy teams = high draft picks = Bumgarner and Posey.
It's amazing he still has a job.
Posted by: carini26 | July 06, 2009 at 09:28 AM
@carini26
Baseball drafting is much different than drafting in other sports. You are obviously looking for the best players available but one must also remain wary of signability concerns. First round picks in baseball are in no way guaranteed stars. Ask the Padres, who drafted Matt Bush #1 overall in 2004. Obtaining 3 top 50 prospects in two drafts is excellent. That's what the Giants did with Sabean.
Posted by: recca | July 06, 2009 at 06:16 PM