![]() |
|
|
| |
« Discussion: Reds Looking To Deal? | Main | Nationals Looking At Defensive Shortstops »
THURSDAY, 9:10pm: Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports say that while the Orioles and Marlins are discussing Uggla, it might not be a match. The Orioles aren't sure how Uggla would produce in the American League, and may be reluctant to give up young talent for two years of his services. Indeed, check out Andy MacPhail's general comments to Jeff Zrebiec:
"I just don't see us giving up a young and talented player for a short-term fix. If we give up a young and talented player and fill a different position that we thought was a greater need going forward, that would be something we'd consider. But I don't see us giving up somebody we see as a core guy for a one- or two-year guy."
Of course, the Marlins didn't get a ton for Josh Willingham and Scott Olsen a year ago, so maybe the price for Uggla will be acceptable.
WEDNESDAY, 3:04pm: MLB.com's Joe Frisaro believes the Nationals will also show interest in Uggla.
1:19pm: The Giants and Orioles are showing the most interest in Dan Uggla, according to Ken Rosenthal and Jon Paul Morosi of FOX Sports. Those clubs would move Uggla to third base, a position he hasn't played since 2005 in the minors. The writers add that the Red Sox have inquired, with an eye on using Uggla in left field. Uggla played 20 games in the outfield in Double A in '04. Rosenthal and Morosi add that an Uggla trade would compel the Marlins to retain Jorge Cantu.
Uggla, 30 in March, hit .243/.354/.459 in 668 plate appearances this season as the Marlins' second baseman. He's under team control for two more years, but is due a raise on his $5.35MM salary of '09.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Wow no it's just a matter of who will give up the best stuff for him haha.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:22 PM
Still hoping the Dodgers pass on this guy.
Posted by: GScott | November 11, 2009 at 01:25 PM
Ken Rosenthal says the Giants and Orioles are the most in it for Uggla, How about Uggla, and someone else for Bumgarner?
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:27 PM
If ther redsox really did inquire on what it would take to get Uggla i wonder what Florida had told them that it would take i am thinking a package heading Buchholz then maybe Bowden and a couple of positionaly players maybe Reddick or Kalish
Posted by: NYYLastPlace4ever | November 11, 2009 at 01:28 PM
man i hope youre right about "the best stuff".the red sox rumor has me thinking about Buchholz.
Posted by: gofish89 | November 11, 2009 at 01:30 PM
No way we give up Bumgarner for this guy. He doesn't hit for average, his defense is questionable at best, all he really provides is pop.
Posted by: Humm Baby | November 11, 2009 at 01:30 PM
Remember this is the Marlins, so they will want cheap and team controlled players for more than one year. Honestly, I think they'll be happy to two average prospects as long as they're team controlled for a while.
Posted by: humannature | November 11, 2009 at 01:32 PM
the Red Sox just got Hermida now they want another Marlin just to make him OF too haha no sense, but I like who the Sox have young pitching and good prospects.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:32 PM
i'm not even a giant fan and i can tell you there isn't anybody the giants would trade bumgarner for, let alone such an incomplete player in uggla.
Posted by: jmurray | November 11, 2009 at 01:33 PM
Marlin will definitely be asking for more than AVERAGE prospects for Uggla.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Great. Just what the Red Sox need. Another guy that strikes out 150+ times a year.
Posted by: SoxFan09 | November 11, 2009 at 01:36 PM
Would the Red Sox even offer Buchholtz straight up for Uggla? I would think not.
Posted by: jrfukudome | November 11, 2009 at 01:38 PM
We will probably give Darren Ford, Rogar kieschnik, and Fred Lewis do you like that marlins?
Posted by: Black-And-Proud | November 11, 2009 at 01:42 PM
No way the Sox even touch their top tier pitching for Uggla. I can't see why they would want him anyway... maybe just looking to put up a front to give leverage in bay's negotiations.
Posted by: bredberg156 | November 11, 2009 at 01:42 PM
The Orioles don't have ANYTHING that would intrest the Marlins. Nothing. Adam Jones but thats not happening.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:42 PM
Black and Proud,
No thank you.
Posted by: gofish89 | November 11, 2009 at 01:43 PM
there is no way Bumgarner would ever be traded to the Marlins unless we got Hanley Ramirez in return and I'm sure the Marlins wouldnt do that.
I'd build a package around Jonathan Sanchez with guys like Nick Noonan, Henry Sosa, and Conor Gillaspie or John Bowker included for Uggla
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 01:43 PM
Let me say one more time... the Florida Marlins DO NOT want a average below average trash pitcher named Johnathan Sanchez in ANY deal. And Black and Proud thats a garbage deal.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:46 PM
I like Uggla going to the Giants. I don't see him moving to 3B, though. More than likely he'd be going to 1B. There is an opening at that position.
I also don't think it would take Bumgarner to get Uggla. Would Dominguez be too much for him? With Sandoval blocking him at 3B, and Uggla possibly at 1B, there's no room for him in that infield. Apparently he's a Chris Davis-type player: high Ks, low BBs, tons of power.
Like many have said here, I don't think it would take an elite prospect to get Uggla. Young solid prospects who could be regular players in the majors seem to be the Marlins' M.O. when it comes to dealing players. He'd definitely fetch more than Hermida did, but not as much as Willis/Cabrera, for obvious reasons.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | November 11, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Uggla would play 3B and Panda would play 1B.
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 11, 2009 at 01:47 PM
Could anyone see the Giants acquring both Uggla AND uribe i mean you could move uggla to left while uribe plays 3rd?
Posted by: Black-And-Proud | November 11, 2009 at 01:48 PM
BTW we have a ton of prospects so if anything we the GIants will acquire Uggla i would give 2 or 3 prospects and Fred Lewis....Marlins give me names of prospects you want from us
Posted by: Black-And-Proud | November 11, 2009 at 01:49 PM
Yes, MarlinsFanatic. The Marlins would have no use for Matt Wieters, Nolan Reimold, Felix Pie, Chris Tillman, Brian Matusz, Jake Arrieta, Josh Bell and Brandon Snyder. Not for their second baseman that they have to trade because they don't want to pay him and he can't get along with Hanley. Their standards are too high to accept such trash. Also, you should definitely attempt to dissuade the club from pursuing left-handed starters earning the minimum who have thrown no-hitters. Set your sights high baby!
Posted by: James F | November 11, 2009 at 01:50 PM
Uggla hasn't played LF since 04 so that would be a difficult adjustment, and his glove isn't that great so he could end up fielding OF balls like lastings millegde haha.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:50 PM
No. Uggla in the OF in a cavernous park like AT&T? That's one reason the Giant's didn't try adding Man-Ram last year, wasn't it? Decreasing OF defence?
I think they'd be interested in bringing Uribe back, but as a starter, I'm not so sure. Any Giant's fans wanna weigh in on this?
Posted by: Ink&Paper | November 11, 2009 at 01:51 PM
It is so sad in that about half of the top players that are in the Major Leagues came up from the Marlins... I mean like cabrera, willis, beckett,, and so many others and to think you could have had manny ramirez a couple years back wow i feel sorry for you guys...if they had made the stadium earlier and more fans would have come the Marlins could have won more than 2 or 3 world series right now but since of their budget that sucks. When is new Marlins stadium opening again?
Posted by: Black-And-Proud | November 11, 2009 at 01:51 PM
Nolan Riemold + Brandon Erbe
C: Wieters
1B: Wigginton/Aubrey
2B: Roberts
SS: Izturis
3B: Uggla
LF: Scott
CF: Jones
RF: Markakis
DH: free agent 1 year deal
Posted by: ugen64 | November 11, 2009 at 01:53 PM
2012 New Stadium their paroll will increase after the new stadium opens up David Sampson says
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:54 PM
Realistically, I could see the Marlins being interested in Sanchez, no matter what MarlinsFantatic says. Florida's FO love acquiring pitchers after all.
He's a MOR-type pitcher, with maybe a #2 ceiling if he stops being inconsistent. Obviously, the Giants would have to throw in a prospect, since I don't see it happening straight up.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | November 11, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Marlins would want Sanchez for Hermida sure, not for Uggla though. Uggla is going to require more talent than a mediocre pitcher.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 01:56 PM
Black and Proud...
What a gross overexaggeration, and a gross butchering of the English language
Posted by: bredberg156 | November 11, 2009 at 01:56 PM
There is no way Reimold and Erbe get dealt for Uggla. Reimold is unlikely to be dealt at all, while Erbe is a Baltimore high school star and is also unlikely to go anywhere.
But even if those two were available, that is way too much for Uggla.
Posted by: James F | November 11, 2009 at 01:58 PM
I'm thinking Reimold & Bergesen for Uggla. Marlins need a LF, moving Coghlan to 2B, and they always can use a good young arm...
Posted by: Systematic Chaos | November 11, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Giants could also move Freddy Sanchez to 3B and keep Uggs at 2B.
Posted by: 55saveslives | November 11, 2009 at 01:58 PM
in what bizarro world is Jonathan Sanchez a "mediocre" pitcher? his career FIP is 4.12. last season his FIP was 4.17. on the Marlins, that makes him the #3 behind Josh Johnson and Ricky Nolasco.
Posted by: ugen64 | November 11, 2009 at 01:59 PM
MarlinsFanatic
how is Jonathan Sanchez a trash pitcher? he is a lefty who can throw 95 mph which is rare and he was in the top 5 in swing and miss stuff and he threw a no-hitter. I know you'll probably say that the no-hitter is no big deal but after the no-hitter he had an ERA in the mid 3.00's
and also I think you are valuing Uggla a bit too much. don't get me wrong he has a ton of power and can hit about 30 bombs every year but he also strikes out a lot and is nothing spectacular on defense
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 02:00 PM
The last thing the Marlins need is a OF Systematic Chaos, we have bryan peterson, brett carroll, scott cousins, mike stanton, greg burns with a chance for the opening LF spot
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:01 PM
Actually Uggla's errors and strikeouts both went down this year so I find that funny. His walks went up tremendously and everyone just grades Uggla's defense based on the all star game. He is actually a decent defender he only had around 12 errors last year.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:03 PM
just like I find it funny that you say Jonathan Sanchez is trash..
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Sanchez for Uggla, uneven trade. Marlins wouldn't waste their time.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:06 PM
did I ever say Sanchez for Uggla straight up? we would obviously include prospects with Sanchez like I mentioned before
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 02:09 PM
"
There is no way Reimold and Erbe get dealt for Uggla. Reimold is unlikely to be dealt at all, while Erbe is a Baltimore high school star and is also unlikely to go anywhere.
But even if those two were available, that is way too much for Uggla."
It all depends on how good Riemold's defense is. If he's really a -15 run left fielder, as he was last season, then we might as well go with Scott and/or Pie in LF and shave some runs off the pitcher ERA. On the other hand, if that Achilles' injury was really a big deal, then it's a different story. (Bill James has him projected to reach an OPS close to .900; combined with average defense, that's a pretty valuable player)
Obviously I have no idea about that; I just think he's one of our most realistic trade chips at this point. If the Marlins would take a deal centered around Brandon Snyder, that would obviously be preferable, but I doubt they want a 1B who can't field and might not be able to hit...
Posted by: ugen64 | November 11, 2009 at 02:09 PM
i may be wrong here... but wouldn't sanchez be a #3 starter for the fish?
Posted by: rotorobby | November 11, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Jonathan Sanchez might be giving the Marlins TOO MUCH for Uggla, but since it's a discussion, it's probably a fair deal.
Posted by: DougMash | November 11, 2009 at 02:12 PM
JJ
Nolascco
Volstad
Sanchez
Miller/Vandenhurk
is what the fish have right now.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:12 PM
"Giants could also move Freddy Sanchez to 3B and keep Uggs at 2B."
Yea they could also move rowand to short and renteria to center
Posted by: Doug | November 11, 2009 at 02:12 PM
thats Anibal Sanchez by the way.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:13 PM
dirty slides in at #3 or 4... not saying its a fair deal, just sayin...
Posted by: rotorobby | November 11, 2009 at 02:14 PM
The return for Uggla will have to be decent. He projects at $15M in surplus value for the acquiring team, the equivalent value of a top 50 pitching prospect in baseball. It doesn't mean the Marlins will get someone like Baumgarner, though I would not put it past Sabean given that he gave up a top 25 pitching prospect in Alderson for Freddy Sanchez, an inferior player.
Uggla will strike out, but as MarlinsFanatic has mentioned, he walks a good deal as well and of course has his power. He's a low contact power-patience hitter with poor defense at second base. A move to third would be beneficial in helping his bad range, I think.
Still, I think a lot of people here are underselling his offense. The Giants had one player last season (Sandoval) who had a better park adjusted wOBA that Dan Uggla. The only other guy who was close was Uribe, and he simply isn't likely to continue to as well as he did last year.
To me, a package involving Fred Lewis and a set of other B prospects would do it. Lewis would come cheap is a decent defender and hitter who deserves more playing time, and the Giants likely have some decent pitching available to trade.
Posted by: Michael Jong | November 11, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Doug
Sanchez actually has played 3B before and even though its a small sample he actually played 3B pretty well
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 02:15 PM
Uggla for Brain Snyder and id be happy
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Uggla in SF that makes sense, he would hit well in that park.
Posted by: tinynick | November 11, 2009 at 02:16 PM
Brandon snyder* my bad
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:16 PM
I dont see the us trading Uggla by himself to the Giants tho.. maybe they'll trade Uggla with Lindstrom or something and get Sanchez, and some minor leaguers... hell, the Marlins might even throw in Anibal Sanchez (I dont see him with the Marlins that much longer anyways)
Posted by: xquiles21x | November 11, 2009 at 02:16 PM
dont see us* sorry
Posted by: xquiles21x | November 11, 2009 at 02:17 PM
"Lewis is a decent fielder"
HA!
Have you ever watched baseball... ever?
when the ball bounces OUT of your glove, it's considered bad...
Posted by: rotorobby | November 11, 2009 at 02:17 PM
wait Uggla,LIndstrom,and Sanchez for J.Sanchez and a couple minor leaguers........NOPE.
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:18 PM
It all depends on how good Riemold's defense is. If he's really a -15 run left fielder, as he was last season, then we might as well go with Scott and/or Pie in LF and shave some runs off the pitcher ERA. On the other hand, if that Achilles' injury was really a big deal, then it's a different story. (Bill James has him projected to reach an OPS close to .900; combined with average defense, that's a pretty valuable player)
Obviously I have no idea about that; I just think he's one of our most realistic trade chips at this point. If the Marlins would take a deal centered around Brandon Snyder, that would obviously be preferable, but I doubt they want a 1B who can't field and might not be able to hit...
Posted by: ugen64 | November 11, 2009 at 02:09 PM
I think that everyone in Baltimore feels that Reimold is capable of playing a plus left field, a position he almost never played prior to the majors. Particularly with his plus arm, if he has even average range after surgery, he should be above average for left.
He would certainly be a very valuable trade chip, but that's part of why the O's won't trade him. He's under control for six more seasons, covering all of his prime and has hit lefties well (which is a sore spot for the O's) and hit well in the AL East. If the O's trade him at all, it will be for a shortstop, I suspect.
Posted by: James F | November 11, 2009 at 02:21 PM
i didnt mean it like that MarlinsFanatic, relax lol... I said i dont see Uggla going by himself so they might throw in somebody else like Sanchez OR Lindstrom... my mistake lol... trust me Im a marlins fan also so i wouldnt want that either
Posted by: xquiles21x | November 11, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Haha
Posted by: MarlinsFanatic | November 11, 2009 at 02:24 PM
MarlinsFanatic - hey, if you'll take Snyder for Uggla straight up, I'd do that. Snyder can only play 1B and he doesn't profile as a particularly good one - average defense at best, maybe an .800-850 OPS in the majors.
Posted by: ugen64 | November 11, 2009 at 02:27 PM
if you want Brandon Snyder the Giants have their own version of him in Brett Pill and Josh Mazzola MarlinsFanatic
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 02:28 PM
James - I guess I wanted to avoid the trap of overvaluing our players, so maybe I overcompensated. I wouldn't trade Riemold for Uggla but I was guessing that's what we'd need to get it done.
From reading posts on Orioles Hangout, it looks like Brandon Erbe or David Hernandez + a low-level prospect is the consensus offer. It looks a lot better without Riemold :)
Posted by: ugen64 | November 11, 2009 at 02:29 PM
I don't necessarily think the O's need him, I mean there offense is phenomenal, but the real concern is pitching. They're a great team, but they're a couple solid starters away from making the AL East a four-headed division.
Posted by: twitter.com/bomberj11 | November 11, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Yes!
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 11, 2009 at 02:40 PM
Black-And-Proud,
Did you really just throw Dontrelle Willis into the mix with the "top players in the Major Leagues" ?
Wow.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | November 11, 2009 at 02:42 PM
Dan Uggla would be a good pick up for the Red Sox, but not as a replacement for Bay. The Red Sox for sure need some offensive "pop" and this guy could help. Put Uggla at second and move Pedroia over to short. (He was origionally signed as a shortstop and played short in the minors) That helps with the offense and solves the long time shortstop problem for the Red Sox.
Posted by: RedSoxFan13 | November 11, 2009 at 02:48 PM
There is no way we would give up Reimold for Uggla. He projects to have a better average, high OBP, and probably 20-25 homer guy. He's younger, cheaper, and should be better than Uggla.
Now, from what I've heard, the Marlins want a 2nd tier pitching prospect that doesn't have to be ready for the majors. I'd be willing to give them Zach Britton straight up for Uggla. We have plenty of pitching prospects, so there's no reason we can't sacrifice a very good one who's only at A.
Posted by: crissfan172 | November 11, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Black-And-Proud,
Did you really just throw Dontrelle Willis into the mix with the "top players in the Major Leagues" ?
Wow.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | November 11, 2009 at 02:42 PM
He meant to say "Burnett." I hope...
Anyway, this is incredible: everyone underselling Uggla's offense is a GIANTS FAN. Remember? Your team had zero pop last year?
Nothing against the Giants of course--just fans who're underestimating Uggla's potential impact on the Giants.
Posted by: breakz | November 11, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Oh...and to Jack. Yes, we have a good offense, but we're really missing a big right-handed bat. Uggla would be a perfect fit that would come without having to give up a whole lot.
Posted by: crissfan172 | November 11, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Uggla for Bowden and Hagadone?
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 02:58 PM
it seems like Uggla has been linked to SF for years... if it was ever going to happen, it would be now... both sides are motivated...but i doubt the giants will send or the marlins will want sanchez... it will be built around prospects if it happens...
then sabean can throw 5/65 at Bay to wrap up the west...
Pablo, Bay, Uggla sounds like a nice 3 4 5 to me...
Uggla and Bay are "GAMERS" too... they'll fit right in
Posted by: rotorobby | November 11, 2009 at 03:02 PM
I don't see how Uggla for J. Sanchez, one of Henry Sosa/ Kevin Pucetas/ Clayton Tanner, Nick Noonan and Conor Gillaspie or Josh Mazzola isnt a good deal for both sides
Posted by: Bleacher_bum_SF | November 11, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Rowand/Velez
f. sanchez
pablo
bay
uggla
Posey/vet (pudge?)
Nate
Renteria
Timmy
Cain
Zito
Sanchez
Penny?
i like that
Posted by: rotorobby | November 11, 2009 at 03:05 PM
"then sabean can throw 5/65 at Bay to wrap up the west..."
Yeah boy..
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 11, 2009 at 03:06 PM
Uggla for a package centered around Sanchez is the most likely scenario.I would love for the dodgers to offer Bilingsley,but they won't weaken a weakness to solve another weakness.We are trading Uggla a year too late.
Posted by: gofish89 | November 11, 2009 at 03:11 PM
"If ther redsox really did inquire on what it would take to get Uggla i wonder what Florida had told them that it would take i am thinking a package heading Buchholz then maybe Bowden and a couple of positionaly players maybe Reddick or KalisH"
Buchholz and others? Why would the red sox ever do that for Dan Uggla?
Posted by: Jeffdogg120 | November 11, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Regarding Uggla...
Scouting reports on a potential shift to 3b commonly end with big red flag on his arm, which is quite sub-par. You don't put a short righty at 1b. Perhaps it could work out at 3b, but for the G-men this isn't very efficient, period. Uggla is often noted as having a less than stellar career outlook because he doesn't fit well any where else on the diamond, and his contact rates are low.
Posted by: JLHC | November 11, 2009 at 03:15 PM
The Nats are a poor fit for Uggla - can you imagine an infield with both him and Adam Dunn?
Posted by: stickyfurr | November 11, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Regarding Sanchez...
Note that he is entering arbitration for the first time. His relative value may be less, since he will make millions here on out.
However, his power breaking pitches ruled lineups in the second half. He has one of the best profiles of a lefty in his mid-20s in baseball. And he is poised for a break-out. With a high probability of regression coming out of the other rotation starters in SF, Sanchez is big chip for Sabean to gamble. Plus, he fits so well in a rotation that otherwise has 2 great RHPs, and soft-tossing LHP in Zito.
If you are trading your best trade chip, don't do it for someone that doesn't plug in to your problem spots in the field directly.
Posted by: JLHC | November 11, 2009 at 03:21 PM
GIANTS! PLEASE do not pick up Uggla. His strikeout numbers are extremely high. How is that a good fit? The Giants need a power hitter who makes contact a lot more often than Uggla.
Posted by: kellum | November 11, 2009 at 03:24 PM
Uggla for Bowden and Hagadone?
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 02:58 PM
Hagadone is in Cleveland now-he was part of the V-Mart trade
Posted by: gobroks | November 11, 2009 at 03:29 PM
The Nats are a poor fit for Uggla - can you imagine an infield with both him and Adam Dunn?
Posted by: stickyfurr | November 11, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Quite comical I would imagine. When I think about it, I hear the Benny Hill theme song.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | November 11, 2009 at 03:31 PM
Kellum -
Uggla would have led last years Giants in HR and probably would have been 2nd or 3rd on the team in OBP... I haven't looked at the numbers, so i may be off a little on the OBP, but I know he would have been in the top 5 at the very least... he is EXACTLY what the giants need...
Posted by: rotorobby | November 11, 2009 at 03:39 PM
For the Red Sox: Uggla for Bowden and Hagadone. I think Uggla would hit 40+ homers at Fenway!
There's the Marlins would want from the Giants or the Orioles. The Giants will never give up Bumgarner or Posey. It's never going to happen. I can see Uggly going to the Dodgers or Twins. He's already been linked to LA in an Uggla/Billingsley swap. As for the Twins, I see something like catcher Wilson Ramos, Joe Benson, and a lower-level prospect (Maybe Danny Rams. He's struggled in the minors but he's very talented and was a high draft pick out of high school).
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 03:40 PM
Nothing*
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 03:42 PM
Uh...we have more high quality prospects than the Red Sox....
Posted by: crissfan172 | November 11, 2009 at 03:45 PM
uggla really isnt a franchise changing player. 30 home runs, 180 K's, and dozens of errors. Hes just gonna frustrate the crap out of anybody that picks him up.
Posted by: yankees88 | November 11, 2009 at 03:49 PM
Oh ya! I forgot that Hagadone was traded. Oh well. Still, Bowden and another prospect.
This has nothing to do with uggla cause the Sox would never give him up for Uggla, but I love Lars Anderson's potential! When are they gonna let this kid play? He's ready!
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 03:49 PM
"Uh...we have more high quality prospects than the Red Sox...."
what does that have to do with anything? If we're trading Uggla, we're gonna want more prospects. The Sox have good ones.
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 03:53 PM
Yes, the Sox have good ones, but we have BETTER ones. Thus, when you said we have nothing the Marlins would want, I don't quite understand seeing as we have pitching prospects better than Bowden.
Posted by: crissfan172 | November 11, 2009 at 04:06 PM
the o's seem like the most logical fit...he'd play 1b or dh if he goes there.
Posted by: JT89 | November 11, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Oh I thought you were talking about the Marlins. And I agree with you that you have better pitching prospects, but none that you would be willing to give up. Bowden is the better prospect than the ones you'd be willing to give up.
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 05:04 PM
"the o's seem like the most logical fit...he'd play 1b or dh if he goes there."
yes, but you have nothing that interests the Marlins to make a deal.
Posted by: JPizzle | November 11, 2009 at 05:06 PM
Ok...I would agree with that, but I'm not so sure they want to part with Bowden for Uggla.
Posted by: crissfan172 | November 11, 2009 at 05:12 PM
I posted three months ago about the O's acquiring Uggla, and was told that I was insane because he didn't have enough bat to play 1B/DH in the AL East.
I'm glad the O's are interested in him, I think he can be a good fit, as a 1B/3B/DH. The Fish want pitching, and the O's have minor league pitching in spades. I doubt that the O's would part with Arrieta or Erbe, but I'm sure that the Fish would be happy with Zach Britton and Jim Miller for Uggla.
Posted by: mstrchef13 | November 11, 2009 at 06:05 PM
What would it take to get Uggla to the Mets?
Posted by: supersteve1492 | November 11, 2009 at 06:53 PM
uggla's a bum
Posted by: philly phan | November 11, 2009 at 07:22 PM
Not sure how well Uggla fits on the Giants. Can't deny his power and he's shown some growth in the patience and BB department but him playing 3B is a huge unknown. Maybe a transition to 1B may not be so bad but part of the staff's success was the teams overall defense, including at 1B. So i guess it comes down to 1) how much would his defense effect the overall defense and 2) is his bat enough to help this team score more runs?
Mind you they dont need to score that many more runs to win 94+ games, but Uggla can't be the lone offensive improvement.
Also depends on what we're giving up. Sanchez is waaaayyy under rated. His stuff is just plain nasty and what people don't realize is this was only his 2nd full year from being converted from the pen. He usually gives up most of his runs/ makes most of his mistakes between the 5-7 innings, and during his second half he was just as good as the top pitchers in the league. Whatever way you look at it he has a lot of upside and could be at least a #3 on most other teams. To me i don't know if you include him in this trade because after you get past Uggla's HR numbers which will surely drop at AT&T, your left with a player that has some glaring holes.
Posted by: Lincecum_Says_GSP | November 11, 2009 at 07:46 PM
why would anyone try to trade for Uggla?
Since he is HIGHLY likely to be non-tendered... just wait until he is an FA- then sign him for free
Posted by: ejs1111 | November 11, 2009 at 08:00 PM