« Red Sox Pick Up Victor Martinez's Option |
Main
| Marlins Rumors: Uggla, Ross, Cantu, Johnson »
By Mike Axisa [November 9, 2009 at 1:00pm CST]
Jon Heyman has a new column up at SI.com, so let's dive on in...
- Scott Boras said on Sunday that the Cardinals have not made any proposals in an effort to retain Matt Holliday, and Heyman says "the chances for Holliday to remain a Cardinal look slim at this point."
- A source familiar with the situation said the Angels offered John Lackey an extension earlier this year worth less than $40MM over three years on top of 2009's $10MM salary, so if they wish to re-sign him now, they'll have to completely rethink their original stance.
- The Red Sox are trying to bring Jason Bay back on a four year, $60MM deal, though his agent maintains that Bay is the "most complete player on the market."
- The Mets, Giants, Braves, Cubs, Mariners, and Yankees could also be interested in Holliday and/or Bay.
- The Mets are believed to have Holliday higher on their wish list than Bay, and are also expected to pursue Randy Wolf.
- There is speculation that Lackey would like to pitch at home in Texas, but the Rangers' interest might depend on how quickly their sale is resolved.
- Heyman says that "MLB has set a tentative Thanksgiving deadline for the sale of the Rangers, but the price tag is expected to be in the $500 million range, and in cases of such big money there are no guarantees that things will go quickly."
- Roy Halladay, Adrian Gonzalez, Carl Crawford, Bobby Jenks, Dan Uggla, and Milton Bradley should highlight a star studded trade market.
- Halladay seems like a good bet to be moved, while the Red Sox and Dodgers represent possible suitors for Gonzalez.
- Tampa has a replacement for Crawford in top prospect Desmond Jennings, while Jenks and Uggla would be moved in cost cutting deals.
- Teams will certainly inquire on the availability of Felix Hernandez, but Heyman says the team plans to spend the winter trying to lock him up long-term. At the GM Meetings today, GM Jack Zduriencik said "Felix is our property. We're going to have him the next two years."
- The Yankees have started to think about re-signing both Johnny Damon and Hideki Matsui.
- Both the Brewers and Mariners are expected to have interest in Jarrod Washburn.
- If the Angels don't re-sign Chone Figgins, they are expected to pursue Adrian Beltre to fill their third base hole.
- The Rangers will let Hank Blalock walk as a free agent, and are expected to promote top prospect Justin Smoak next year.
- Orlando Hudson is expected to leave the Dodgers as a free agent, though Heyman says they could re-sign Ronnie Belliard to compete with Blake DeWitt at second base.
- Team officials would not be shocked if the Red Sox tried to move David Ortiz and/or Mike Lowell, though it's going to be tough to move them with all the DH-types available on the free agent market.
Bay is the most complete player on the market this year...... if you completely ignore the whole "playing the field" aspect of baseball.
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 09, 2009 at 01:04 PM
Cameron will be a better bargain than Bay.
Posted by: Baseball Nut | November 09, 2009 at 01:08 PM
If Bay is dumb enough to listen to his agent and think "he is the best complete player available" when Halladay is right in front of you, then hes nuts. $60 million is par for the course, i can see negotiations going to $70 million over 4 and thats fair too, but lets not go nuts here.
I think if Bay walks and Halladay goes to the Mets like Tim predicts, then the Red Sox should trade for Crawford and a corner power hitter and move Lowell to make room, give Ortiz another chance, the man had a monster second half
Posted by: 04Forever | November 09, 2009 at 01:10 PM
man i hope washburn comes home to wisconsin, and the brewers are definatly looking into lackey, they were willing to offer cc 6 years 120 mil, so i think they can fork up a little but for lackey.
Posted by: brewsers | November 09, 2009 at 01:11 PM
Ortiz for Jenks
Chicago gets a power left-handed DH and Boston gets another solid BP arm.
Now that would be crazy.
Posted by: whitesoxfan424 | November 09, 2009 at 01:11 PM
"
If Bay is dumb enough to listen to his agent and think "he is the best complete player available" when Halladay is right in front of you, then hes nuts. $60 million is par for the course, i can see negotiations going to $70 million over 4 and thats fair too, but lets not go nuts here.
I think if Bay walks and Halladay goes to the Mets like Tim predicts, then the Red Sox should trade for Crawford and a corner power hitter and move Lowell to make room, give Ortiz another chance, the man had a monster second half"
His name is HOLLIDAY. How hard is it to confuse Roy Halladay for Matt Holliday? Jesus Christ.
Posted by: Jays24 | November 09, 2009 at 01:15 PM
I think the White Sox would have to be half insane to trade Jenks to the Red Sox for David Ortiz. I think the Sox would just flip Denks again for a hitter since he is currently worth more then Ortiz
Posted by: 04Forever | November 09, 2009 at 01:15 PM
"most complete player on the market."
HAHAHAAHAHHAAAAA
I don't see Tampa Bay moving Captain Carl. They said it themselves that they have a very small window in which to compete and this would certainly not be in line with that vision. You never know, a full year of Wade 'Magic' Davies, bounceback by BJ Upton, Bartlett and Zobeast playing fulltime. Not hard to see them snatching the Wild Card.
Posted by: Aranathor | November 09, 2009 at 01:16 PM
I wish all these bloody sports writers would stop linking the Mariners to Bay and Holliday. The Mariners are not going to sign either of them. Neither are great defenders (a must for a JZ outfielder), Bay is right handed, Holliday got killed in the west, and they would both want too much money and contract length. AND the biggest reason is that in a year, Dustin Ackely will be ready to take left next to Gutierrez.
Posted by: Boy9988 | November 09, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Rays are not going to trade Crawford to the Red Sox
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 09, 2009 at 01:17 PM
I highly doubt that the Rays would move Crawford within the division. I think someone like the Cardinals would look at him with the vacancy that could be left with Holliday in Free Agency. Although I would love to see Crawford in Left at Fenway, I dont think it will happen unless its through FA.
Posted by: Matty Deesh | November 09, 2009 at 01:20 PM
"His name is HOLLIDAY. How hard is it to confuse Roy Halladay for Matt Holliday? Jesus Christ."
dont get your panties in a bunch, there names are different by one letter, mistakes happen, calm down overly sensitive person
Posted by: 04Forever | November 09, 2009 at 01:20 PM
I imagine the Cardinals are just going to be patient and see where the market takes the price for Holliday...If it stays around the 7yr 110mil range I can still see them getting involved if it gets much higher than that I hope they have a play B in place
Posted by: stlcards16 | November 09, 2009 at 01:21 PM
"dont get your panties in a bunch, there names are different by one letter, mistakes happen, calm down overly sensitive person"
I see you here posting often and figured you'd be smarter than to make such an egregiously bad mistake.
Posted by: Jays24 | November 09, 2009 at 01:22 PM
04: It's 2 letters dammit! Get it right! lol jk
Posted by: stlcards16 | November 09, 2009 at 01:23 PM
you thought wrong then i guess, didnt realize i was being graded for my grammer
Posted by: 04Forever | November 09, 2009 at 01:26 PM
the guy with an H at the beginning of his name
Posted by: 04Forever | November 09, 2009 at 01:28 PM
"Team officials would not be shocked if the Red Sox tried to move David Ortiz and/or Mike Lowell, though it's going to be tough to move them with all the DH-types available on the free agent market."
The Red Sox would love to move one of them but the chances are very slim. Their best hope would be to move Lowell to somebody who misses out on someone like Beltre, Figgins, or Derosa. The only problem is the teams with payroll flexibility would be the ones to get those 3. The Red Sox won't get equal value for either of these two so their best bets are to hold onto them for their final year and then go from there.
Posted by: redsox22 | November 09, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Ortiz for Jenks
Chicago gets a power left-handed DH and Boston gets another solid BP arm.
Now that would be crazy.
Posted by: whitesoxfan424 | November 09, 2009 at 01:11 PM
I would rather have Mike Lowell cause at least he can field some times.
If i were to trade Jenks it would probably be for a leadoff hitter. Jenks and prospects for Carl Crawford, or Jenks for Juan Pierre straight up
Posted by: Rock&RollGangsta | November 09, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Unless Beltre comes on an amazing deal (think Abreu of last year) I don't see the Angels going for him. They will either go all out to keep Figgins or be resigned to the fact that Wood/Izturis will man 3rd base. If something like 3/33 will keep Figgins in house I don't see why the Angels would offer a 1/10 or 2/20 type deal for Beltre.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 09, 2009 at 01:40 PM
I think the Dodgers would be all over that Jenks for Pierre deal.
As for misspelling Holliday/Hallday - why are Jay fans always so upset about this? Seems like whenever there is a post about these guys someone will miskey their name. Immediately Jays fans become unhinged and start screaming at people. Chill out already. People are typing comments on their phones or while they are watching TV or being distracted by kids. Sorry that your franchise player has a very similar spelling to another franchise player who is on the FA market. Cut the hysteria out already.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 09, 2009 at 01:43 PM
I can see Lackey coming back home to Arlington he went to college at UT-Arlington. It all depends on the sale of the Rangers which will be the greatest day in the history of the Rangers thus far getting rid of that dummy Tom Hicks which has had my team hostage since 1999. If the sales goes through....watch out for my rangers where just a couple of players away.
Posted by: Rangerfan | November 09, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Ugh, I do not want Randy Wolf at all. The time to get Wolf was last year at 1 yr 5 mil. Now he will be looking for a bigger contract and more years. No thanks. I would rather take my chances on a high risk-high reward arm like Rich Harden, Erik Bedard, Ben Sheets, or Justin Duchscherer. This makes a little nervous hearing Wolf's name pop up.
Posted by: JoseJoseJoseeee | November 09, 2009 at 02:19 PM
"I think the Dodgers would be all over that Jenks for Pierre deal."
Yeah that would be insane.. If that pen lives up to its potential then Jenks would likely be the 4th best reliever on the club.
But Jenks would likely be the highest paid.
"Ugh, I do not want Randy Wolf at all. The time to get Wolf was last year at 1 yr 5 mil. Now he will be looking for a bigger contract and more years. No thanks. I would rather take my chances on a high risk-high reward arm like Rich Harden, Erik Bedard, Ben Sheets, or Justin Duchscherer. This makes a little nervous hearing Wolf's name pop up.
Posted by: JoseJoseJoseeee | November 09, 2009 at 02:19 PM"
The Dodgers should be after all those guys. Priority - Justin Duchscherer, Harden, Garland, and then Bedard.
If Ned can nab two of them for around 15 million, I would be thrilled.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 09, 2009 at 02:26 PM
Lowell would be a good pick up for any team really, but the Sox would have to eat his salary if they move him. No team will pay what Boston is paying for him right now....NO WAY!
Posted by: dj tizzo | November 09, 2009 at 02:30 PM
I think that the Sox keep Ortiz, because if you remove really the first half, we were seeing the same sluggin' Ortiz.
Posted by: twitter.com/bomberj11 | November 09, 2009 at 02:38 PM
you thought wrong then i guess, didnt realize i was being graded for my grammer
Posted by: 04Forever | November 09, 2009 at 01:26 PM
The correct spelling of the word is "grammAr."
Sorry...couldn't resist. lol
Posted by: East Coast Bias | November 09, 2009 at 02:38 PM
and technically you didnt have bad grammar, you just had the wrong guy....ok problem solved..lets move on :)
Posted by: chowdah | November 09, 2009 at 02:56 PM
Why not just let Brandon Wood fill the 3B hole? I don't see how its a "hole," especially with Aybar firmly planted at SS. Pitching is the primary concern on that team.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 09, 2009 at 02:57 PM
i dont see the yankees signing both damon and matsui, it just doesnt make sense.
Posted by: yanksrdashit | November 09, 2009 at 03:23 PM
04.. the letter I should be capitalized when referring to yourself...
Posted by: Giant Deric | November 09, 2009 at 03:25 PM
The White Sox need to get rid of Jenks one way or another. Thornton needs to close their games. Jenks and a low prospect for Pierre and cash seems fair.
Posted by: WindyCityWarrioe | November 09, 2009 at 03:49 PM
I agree with Tim, --i could see the mets making a huge splash for matt holliday 6 years 120mil some crazy deal. Im more confident that marquis, from NYC, will most likely be a met next season.
For some reason, I see the red sox keeping Bay at a modest deal, because i think in the near future Epstein has something up his sleeve for a big deal with adrian gonzalez.
that leaves lackey--i do not see him going to any other AL bigshots. If he stays in the AL it will be with a deal worked out with LAA. He's a competitive guy and i think he wants to beat nyy and bos rather than win with them, especially given the angels' recent postseason history. Players go to the yanks, redsox to have the best shot at contention--but LAA is 3rd or 4th on AL payrolls/ playoff contention. Keeping Lackey they can still compete effectively in the wide-open AL West.
However, If the mets are outbid in the holliday sweepstakes, im sure they will be ready and waiting for a quick shot at bringing Lackey to the NL east.
San Francisco--some combination of Marlon Byrd, Nick Johnson, Rocco Baldelli, X Nady. prob 2 of the 4. def need some guys with pop/high obp.
LAD--i think its obvious they will attempt something in regards to Harden, Bedard, Sheets, Pavano. possibly resign Wolf. they ll definitely be in the chapman challenge as well.
Phils hopefully will land beltre at 3rd. 3 year deal 30 mil. after locking up lee for 2010, this is gonna be the big move for ruben this offseason. i understand valverde's effectiveness as a closer, and we definitely need someone like that, but his antics are too much. He belongs with the mets as a set-up guy for K-Rod. That way they can both pump their fists, jump up and down, and point to heaven when they finish closer to the nats than the phils. Wouldnt mind the phils pickin up Rodney--i think he'd do well in the NL. JC romero will come back healthy, chan ho will be resigned--phils bullpen will be alright.
NYY who cares. they ll prob have all these guys i just mentioned by the time i post this.
Posted by: jrollpatrol2008 | November 09, 2009 at 04:09 PM
Bobby Jenks, Jordan Danks and cash for Carl Crawford, get it done Kenny. Try to sign him to an extension.
If for some reason you can't, go for BJ Upton, which I assume would take less.
Posted by: ChiSox723 | November 09, 2009 at 05:22 PM
The Cubs might be in on Holliday? I think I'd pass out if that happened. The Cubs are sounding like bigger and bigger cheapskates every time someone from their management speaks. They have a cash cow and refuse to spend anymore money.
The sad thing is, that they could get Holliday if they really wanted to, and then put him in RF. I won't hold my breath though. We'll be watching him play OF for the Yankees next year with all of the other all stars who are paid in Monopoly money.
Posted by: TheGrinch | November 09, 2009 at 05:26 PM
a great trade is always between AL and NL teams
for instance
angels Casey Kotchman
Braves mark texeira
Posted by: teamie | November 09, 2009 at 05:40 PM
Bobby Jenks, Jordan Danks and cash for Carl Crawford, get it done Kenny. Try to sign him to an extension.
If for some reason you can't, go for BJ Upton, which I assume would take less.
Posted by: ChiSox723 | November 09, 2009 at 05:22 PM"
I don't think the Rays would do that for Upton, and no way would that be enough for Crawford.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 09, 2009 at 05:45 PM
What would it honestly take for the Dodgers to get Gonzalez? Would the Padres take Loney, or would a Gonzalez deal be a precursor to a Halladay type deal(for an ace). I know the Padres want to have Blanks at 1B, but would they want Loney to end his contract there/use him as bait themselves? Thoughts, espically from SD fans.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 09, 2009 at 06:30 PM
You could be right dodger blue, it may take more. But i still think that Kenny should give Friedman a call and inquire about one of them.
Posted by: ChiSox723 | November 09, 2009 at 06:32 PM
The Dodgers should be after all those guys. Priority - Justin Duchscherer, Harden, Garland, and then Bedard.
If Ned can nab two of them for around 15 million, I would be thrilled.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 09, 2009 at 02:26 PM
That's because it's a smart move to let Wolf walk if he wants 3/30 like reported and sign a better pitcher for less money. I want Harden in the Mets rotation next year. I just pray that Omar doesn't overpay Randy Wolf.
Posted by: JoseJoseJoseeee | November 09, 2009 at 07:57 PM
"The ideal package for Halladay would include a young mid-rotation starter with an upside, a top pitching prospect, a possible major-league shortstop and an outfield prospect."
So if this is what they will want, how about this....
McDonald, either Lindblom or Withrow, DeJesus or DeWitt and Lambo?
A mid rotation starter thats ready right now in McDonald, either a closer who is MLB ready in Lindblom or a Billingsley-esque pitcher in Withrow, a SS who is MLB ready, or 2B(depending on what they want), and Lambo, who is raking in the AFL and had a bad year because it was his first taste of advanced pitching...
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 09, 2009 at 08:37 PM
McDonald would not be able to be a mid-rotation starter right now, especially in the AL.
Withrow needs to prove something before he can be called "Billingsley-esque)".
DeWitt lost a lot of stock with his performance this year.
Posted by: R y a n | November 09, 2009 at 09:25 PM
SBM, I know he wouldnt be a MOR starter right now. How I read the article, I thought they would want a guy who will be a MOR starter, not is currently...
Withrow struck out 10.4/9 in his first year as a pro. Similar to Billingsleys. He has a similar build and similar stuff, but needs to work on the same thing Billz does now, walks. And he is 21...
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 09, 2009 at 10:04 PM
forgot the DeWitt thing...
He had a bad year, absolutley. However, that could be contributated btwn going back and forth New Mexico and LA. He has said he didnt have a house in either place because it seemed every few weeks he was recalled, stay a few weeks, then went back. He came up to the Dodgers 7 times this season.... there was no way he could have been expected to have a good year at the plate when he wasnt with one team for more than a few weeks
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 09, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Crawford would command more than Jenks & Danks? You guys are delusional! Crawfords good but his trade value isnt what you guys might think it is.
Tampa needs position prospects in a bad way. They are so loaded with pitching its sick! Any team that offered a good vetran reliever and prospects (postition prospects) would have a pretty good chance!
Posted by: dj tizzo | November 09, 2009 at 10:42 PM
He came up to the Dodgers 7 times this season....
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 09, 2009 at 10:06 PM
Im not really sure about the rules, but I thought a player could only be called up and sent down like 3 times before they were out of options? Not doubting you, Im just unclear on the rules I guess! Could sombody clarify for me?
Posted by: dj tizzo | November 09, 2009 at 10:46 PM
dj, They have 3 option years. Once they are sent down once they use up that option year. however, they can continue to be sent up and down throughout the year, without using any more options.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | November 09, 2009 at 11:07 PM
Am I the only person that thinks Crawford is going to slowly start crawling down hill?
I am not saying rapidly...but throughout history, players of his body type start to decline when they hit the 30-32 year old range...with exceptions of players like Brock.
He is a speedster, his legs are his money maker...they will slow down. He will probably always be a solid .300 hitter with a good obp...but he won't always be worth 10 million and a starting job in left.
Posted by: CardsFan | November 10, 2009 at 07:01 AM
Hahaha. Like hell we go after Holliday. We haven't gone after a truly big outfielder in quite some time if memory serves. Talking about the Atlanta Braves that is.
Either way, there's no way we could afford him.
Posted by: Akiyama | November 10, 2009 at 02:43 PM
I think the White Sox should sign Podsednik to a one year deal with a plate appearance option, move Quentin to right, and sign Aubrey Huff as your DH/ corner utility guy.He can spell PK, Teahen, Quentin and Pods. Plus he is a lefty bat with power.
Posted by: WindyCityWarrioe | November 11, 2009 at 12:54 PM