Nationals Notes: Strasburg, LaRoche

The latest on the Nationals…

  • Stephen Strasburg hasn't yet qualified for arbitration, but that won't prevent him from earning a salary comparable to that of an accomplished first time eligible starter. Strasburg will earn $3.9MM in 2013, according to Adam Kilgore of the Washington Post. The right-hander signed a record contract after the Nationals selected him first overall in 2009.
  • Adam LaRoche hasn’t been in contact with the Nationals about a possible contract extension in about a week, the free agent first baseman told Bill Ladson of (Twitter link). Kilgore reported last week that the sides has established some parameters for a new deal.

11 Responses to Nationals Notes: Strasburg, LaRoche Leave a Reply

  1. ugotrpk3113 3 years ago

    I pray Laroche hits the market. I truly believe he would be an excellent fit in Boston for the next couple years.

    Don’t have my hopes up though…

    • Mike 3 years ago

      Remember when LaRoche was on the Red Sox back in ’09 for a week? Why did they think Casey Kotchman was the better 1B?

      • ugotrpk3113 3 years ago

        Just one of many really bad decisions after 07.

  2. Daniel T 3 years ago

    I highly doubt LaRoche is in D.C. next year.. Makes sense to allow for him to hit the market and move Morse out of the OF

    • Natsfan89 3 years ago

      Highly doubt is a little strong. LaRoche legitimately wants to stay in DC and the Nationals have a good deal of payroll flexibility.

      • Daniel T 3 years ago

        I say highly doubt because I think LaRoche wants a multi-year deal and Rizzo would only be willing to give him 1 year. Though I suppose there could be a compromise, with a 1 year deal and a player option for the 2nd year.. Who knows? I wouldn’t be against having him with the team next year

    • William Kafer 3 years ago

      Honestly, I’m pretty sure I’d rather see them trade Morse and re-sign LaRoche to play first.

  3. Fishman27 3 years ago

    I think laroche to the orioles on a 3/48 with an option

    • ugotrpk3113 3 years ago

      Yikes.. That would be surprising (to the Dodgers, not so much)

      • You Know Who 3 years ago

        What about the dodgers they already have a 1b who’s better good the last time I checked

        • ugotrpk3113 3 years ago

          It was more of a joke at how they are throwing lots of money around. That 3 years 48 mil would be in Dodgers ballpark, but no one else’s

Leave a Reply