Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Ellsbury, Santana, Pierre

As we wait for the GM Meetings to wrap-up in California, here are some links from the week that was around the baseball blogosphere…

If you have a suggestion for this feature, Mike can be reached here. Only one email per week, please.


15 Responses to Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Ellsbury, Santana, Pierre Leave a Reply

  1. start_wearing_purple 3 years ago

    An Iglesias for Profar trade also makes sense for the Red Sox. However like an Andrus for Ellsbury swap my bet is the Rangers say “No.”

    • Ben_Cherington 3 years ago

      Took the words out of my mouth! What a bad article!

      • start_wearing_purple 3 years ago

        Exactly. Most of the article are reasons to get rid of Ellsbury followed by reasons Andrus would be good for the Sox. Add to it, he ends the article saying the Sox would have to throw in a prospect, so how does that make sense for the Sox? Sell low and give up a prospect… yeah sure whatever.

    • hefe300 3 years ago

      Completely agree. You have be living in a Red Sox-centic Universe to believe that 2 years of Andrus is only worth 1 year of Ellsbury. There would have to be far more than a bit of pot sweetening to get 2 years an all-star SS for a player who has missed the kind of time Ellsbury has with injury.

      • Ben_Cherington 3 years ago

        Well, having said that, Ellsbury has a lot more potential. His major issues are signability and staying on the field.

      • LazerTown 3 years ago

        My thoughts exactly. Trade makes absolutely no sense for the Rangers unless you throw in a few good prospects.

  2. Piro Espinal 3 years ago

    In what world would I trade Ellsburry for Andrus? Is he even serious? I’ll need to get Andrus and 2 more prospects and I might think about it.

    • EightMileCats 3 years ago

      I’ll assume that’s sarcasm.

      An injury plagued OF with 1 MVP caliber season and some partial seasons(due to injury)that were solid.
      And a durable SS who plays to notch D and makes good contact.. And has an extra year before FA.

      It’s the BoSox that’d have to include prospects

    • NYPOTENCE 3 years ago

      I’d take Andrus over Ellsbury in a heartbeat.

  3. Lefty_Orioles_Fan 3 years ago

    An Open Letter was penned to Duquette just to mention “O” BTW how about Jason Bay? Good Gravy Man!

  4. NYPOTENCE 3 years ago

    Don’t know if the Nationals would be better without Michael Bourn but they would certainly still be formidable without him.

    • EightMileCats 3 years ago

      I don’t know that Bourne is the answer(too many SO)for a pure lead off hitter.
      But I do think they’d be better off with a true lead off hitter so Werth can slide down in the order

  5. Bob Bunker 3 years ago

    ellsbury to the nationals for morse and a pitching prospect seems more likely than ellsbury for andrus. the problem is the sox need pitching, ss, and power hitting which teams are unlikely to give up for ellsbury. morse is probally worth a little less than ellsbury so i dont know if the red sox would do that trade but it seeems more likely than the rangers giving up andrus.

    • EightMileCats 3 years ago

      The problem really is Ells has been oft injured and is basically unable to be signed to an extension.
      When he’s healthy, he’s one of the top players in the game.. But who’s going to give up much for 1 year of Ells if he stays healthy.

      Last 3 seasons Ells has played 18 games, 158, and 74…
      Not an inspiring record

      • LazerTown 3 years ago

        Top players in 2011. No other season in his career did he show anywhere near that much power. I’ll believe it when he repeats that kind of power.

Leave a Reply