Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Nationals To Acquire Gio Gonzalez

By Ben Nicholson-Smith | December 22, 2011 at 3:10pm CDT

The Athletics will trade Gio Gonzalez to the Nationals in a deal that further depletes Oakland's pitching staff and adds to Washington's potentially dominant rotation. The deal sends Gonzalez and minor league right-hander Robert Gilliam to Washington in exchange for four highly-regarded young players, including three of the Nationals' top ten prospects: right-handers A.J. Cole and Brad Peacock, left-hander Tom Milone and catcher Derek Norris. ESPN.com's Keith Law broke the news on Twitter, with Scott Miller of CBSSports.com reporting Gilliam's inclusion in the deal.

Gio Gonzalez A's

Gonzalez (pictured) will join Stephen Strasburg and Jordan Zimmermann atop an impressive-looking Nationals' rotation that also figures to include Chien-Ming Wang and John Lannan. Gonzalez, 26, is under team control through 2015. He has reached the 200-inning plateau in each of the past two seasons without posting an ERA above 3.23.

However, no MLB pitcher has walked more opponents than Gonzalez in the past two seasons and he's about to get expensive through arbitration (projected 2012 salary of $4.2MM). While most teams –the Nationals included — can stomach a $4.2MM salary for an established, young left-handed starter, the A's haven't resolved their stadium situation and operate under a more limited payroll.

Without Gonzalez and Trevor Cahill, two of the 40 MLB pitchers to throw 200 innings this past season, Oakland's rotation will look considerably different in 2012. Brandon McCarthy, Guillermo Moscoso, Brett Anderson, Dallas Braden, Tyson Ross and Josh Outman are possible starters for the A's, who entered the offseason with a deeper rotation than most.

Gilliam, 24, was an eighth-round draft pick for the A's in the 2009 draft.  The right-hander has a 4.55 ERA, a 3.07 K/BB ratio and has 270 strikeouts in 287 innings of pro ball, with his highest level of advancement being Class A Stockton last season.

Peacock (#3), Cole (#4) and Norris (#9) all rank among the Nationals' top ten prospects, according to Baseball America's latest rankings. Peacock emerged as "one of the most exciting power arms in the high minors" this year, BA reports. The 23-year-old posted a 2.39 ERA with 10.9 K/9 and 2.9 BB/9 in the upper minors before getting called up to the Nationals and appearing in three games.

Cole posted a 4.04 ERA with 10.9 K/9 and 2.4 BB/9 in 89 innings at Class A this past season. The 2010 fourth rounder is just 19 years old and stands 6'4". Milone, 24, made his MLB debut this past season, posting a 3.81 ERA with 5.2 K/9 and 1.4 BB/9 in five starts with the Nationals. He spent most of the season at Triple-A, where he had a 3.22 ERA with 9.4 K/9 and 1.0 BB/9 in 148 1/3 innings.

Norris, 22, entered the 2011 season as the 72nd best prospect in the game, according to Baseball America. He responded by posting a .210/.367/.446 line in his first stint at Double-A, adding 20 homers and 77 walks.

Though Nationals GM Mike Rizzo would no doubt have preferred to acquire Gonzalez for lesser prospects, it was clear from the beginning of the offseason that Gonzalez would require a substantial return. The Red Sox, Rangers, Marlins, Yankees, Blue Jays, Tigers and Mariners were also linked to Gonzalez this winter. Earlier in the offseason, A's GM Billy Beane obtained minor leaguers Jarrod Parker, Collin Cowgill and Ryan Cook for Cahill and Craig Breslow.

Photo courtesy Icon SMI.

Share 46 Retweet 131 Send via email0

Oakland Athletics Washington Nationals Gio Gonzalez

AL Central Notes: Cespedes, Darvish, Twins
Main
Quick Hits: Astros, Fielder, Red Sox, Bonser
View Comments (460)
Post a Comment

460 Comments

  1. Matthew T

    13 years ago

    And Red Sox fans everywhere can now un-pee their pants.

    Reply
    • 0bsessions

      13 years ago

      Man, it is far too late for that. The relief just washed over me and I couldn’t help it.

      Reply
      • Guest 5660

        13 years ago

        If only the system down there worked that way.  

        I was hoping for the BoSox to get him, but glad we didn’t trade Lavarnway or any of the rest of our depleted farm since the AGon trade.

        Would have given any of the ‘plateau-ed’ guys – Anderson, Reddick, Doubront, Weiland, Miller, Iglesias etc… in a package though

        Reply
        • chico65

          13 years ago

          Oh, okay, in a package then.  I’m taking it Weiland would be the centerpiece of your deal?

          Reply
      • Leonard Washington

        13 years ago

        I know. So happy we didnt empty out half of our top 10 for Gio.

        Reply
        • Chris Dickerson

          13 years ago

          I personally would rather pay cash for Roy Oswalt and Madson Gio is not that good of a pitcher if the  Soxs land Bailey thats will be nice 

          Reply
          • Leonard Washington

            13 years ago

            Yeah most definitely. Gio would be nice to have but honestly watching guys who walk people like he does gets annoying the example here being Dice-K…omg what an annoying start to watch. Gio could def improve that though but even still the package they got for him was a huge overpay, and one year of Oswalt is ideal seeing as we could get in on any top FA pitcher next season, hopefully Hamels hits the market.

            Reply
            • Justin Whitlock

              13 years ago

              They have Gio, who threw 200+ with >3.50 ERA both ages 24 and 25, for four years on the cheap. That is MUCH better than paying for an expensive one year stopgap that could get hurt at any time. 

              Reply
              • Leonard Washington

                13 years ago

                For one we will have depth behind him im sure. Two as good as Gio is pitching at Fenway walking 100 people is only gonna make his stat line come back to reality. Then your stuck with a three starter with a twos ceiling for what? Four of your top ten prospects. No thanks pay the money sign someone else next year or trade for someone a bit better than Gio for the same package. 

                Reply
          • Bruce Thoele

            13 years ago

            just letting you know oswalt was better in his prime but gio is better now hes 25 and oswalt is 34

            Reply
        • Justin Whitlock

          13 years ago

          You obviously did not excel in Math. Three of ten is not half, more like less than 1/3 of their top ten and only one was top five. 

          Reply
          • Leonard Washington

            13 years ago

            I am obviously speaking in generalities obviously the point was it was an overpay.

            Reply
          • Leonard Washington

            13 years ago

            And yeah all four are widely considered to be in their top 10 prospects. 

            Reply
    • mainesox

      13 years ago

      Hey, remember that time the Red Sox didn’t trade for Gio?  Good times, good times.

      Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        13 years ago

        this is way better than the melancon trade

        Reply
      • diesel2410

        13 years ago

        Yeah I remember

        Reply
      • MeowMeow

        13 years ago

        I shudder to think what we’d have to resort to in response to an injury had we traded for Gonzalez. We might as well have just sold one of our minor league affiliates because we barely have enough talent to fill them as-is >_>

        Reply
    • grownice

      13 years ago

       Harry: “I got… I gotta stop and got to the bathroom”
       Lloyd: “Just go man… Oh… that’s really warm.”

      Reply
    • Thomas W

      13 years ago

      Fun Fact: Gio Gonzalez 09-11 8.8 fWAR Jason Hammels 09-11 8.8 fWAR

      Reply
      • Joe L

        13 years ago

        Cool. I’m sure Tim Lincecum and Dillon Gee have a stat in common also. 

        Reply
        • Thomas W

          13 years ago

          is it three years worth of MLB wins above replacement?

          Reply
      • CaseyBlakeDeWitt

        13 years ago

        Gio actually only had a 7.8 fWAR during that time period.

        Reply
    • diesel2410

      13 years ago

      Worst offseason ever for the Sox….

      I love it!

      Reply
      • kevinfoley46

        13 years ago

        Well when they have seemingly great offseasons, they have….2011. So let’s try something new.

        Reply
    • Justin Whitlock

      13 years ago

      Because they have to go into next year again with that horrid rotation? A slew of arms destined to and will once against cost Red Sox nation from another title. You think Beckett has any chance of repeating last season? There is nothing coming off that farm to help either… Lester and Buccholz are nice, Beckett should be back and solid also…but there is nothing after that…at all…and the first three have all had their share of issues. 

      Reply
  2. jljr222

    13 years ago

    And boom goes the dynamite…

    Typed it wrong, my bad 😀

    Reply
    • oleosmirf 2

      13 years ago

      fail

      Reply
      • jljr222

        13 years ago

        smh

        Reply
  3. Shawnthemon

    13 years ago

    I’m happy the Jays didn’t get Gio. I wouldn’t want to give up half of that.

    Reply
    • Bombastic_Dave

      13 years ago

      Liked.  I’d rather we try our luck at one of five players breaking out than to put all eggs in the Gio basket.

      Reply
      • Shawnthemon

        13 years ago

        I would have thought a package like that would get Garza

        Reply
        • Ryan

          13 years ago

          I would think it would be enough to get Garza.  It’s more than the Cubs gave up for him last year when he had one more year of control.  The funny part was most people thought that was too much for Garza last year. 

          Reply
          • Justin Whitlock

            13 years ago

            We wanted Gio…he is a far better product, read:
            fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/is-gio-gonzalez-wort…

            Reply
        • Justin Whitlock

          13 years ago

          Garza is basically the same pitcher, more expensive, and under control a shorter period. 

          Reply
      • Roy-Z

        13 years ago

        Not to mention Gio’s endeavors versus the AL East. With his walk rate and those batters seeing him 3-4 times per year? Game over.

        Reply
  4. notsureifsrs

    13 years ago

    happy for the athletics because that is an awesome haul for gio

    happier for boston though. bullet dodged

    edit: and to be fair to the nationals, gio shouldn’t regress much if at all in the NL. here’s hoping he continues to improve and everyone wins. strasburg-zimmerman-gonzalez could turn out to be an excellent top 3 when the time comes

    Reply
    • YanksFanSince78

      13 years ago

      Think the Mets and Braves just crapped themselves a little bit more?

      Phillies were already the favorites. The Marlins and the Nats have done a very good job of improving themselves. The Braves and Mets…..not much at all.

      Reply
  5. dc21892

    13 years ago

    What a haul, lmao. Maybe I’m second guessing myself. I wanted to see Boston grab him just cause I wanted to see them make a move, but nevermind, I’m good.

    Reply
  6. not_brooks

    13 years ago

    Great deal for the A’s.

    2015!

    Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      13 years ago

      really great deal. cole and norris are fantastic and peacock is no scrub either

      Reply
      • Snoochies8

        13 years ago

        and milone may not be a strikeout machine, but 16 walks in 140+ innings…not too shabby

        Reply
        • not_brooks

          13 years ago

          I hadn’t even heard of Milone until today, but his peripherals look great.

          His walk rate has dropped and his K-rate has increased in each of the past three seasons.

          Could be a dark horse for the starting rotation.

          Reply
          • Snoochies8

            13 years ago

            yeah milone looks pretty good, only knock is that he doesn’t throw 90 mph, or at least tops out at it

            Reply
            • Marky

              13 years ago

              BA had him as the best control and changeup in the organization. 

              Reply
              • Snoochies8

                13 years ago

                i’m definitely going to see some rivercats games next year, jesus, a possible opening day rotation of (2 of) parker, gray, peacock, and milone. that’s naaaasty, plus green, miller, parker, ka’aiahue (however you spell it) on offense, should be an awesome group to watch

                Reply
          • Fifty_Five

            13 years ago

            Probably because he only throws like 86-88. But he can pitch definitely, I like him better than peacock

            Reply
            • 0bsessions

              13 years ago

              You know who else has relatively low velocity and doesn’t know how to issue a walk?

              Cliff Lee says velocity is overrated when you have pinpoint control.
              Seriously, I’m new to the Milone train myself, but looking at his peripherals, if the A’s want Middlebrooks all that bad and think this mid-eighties throwing scrub is such a waste, I’ve got a trade proposal for them…

              Reply
          • Jakmagic

            13 years ago

            I haven’t heard of him till today also. Guess by how everyone talks about him he is kind of like a Shawn Marcum type pitcher. That’s not a bad thing either.

            Reply
      • padresfuture

        13 years ago

        While I don’t think the return is as good as the Padres got for Latos, I have to agree that this was a fantastic return for the A’s – certainly more than I expected.

        Reply
  7. brett m.

    13 years ago

    Its a lot but If there was one area in the system we could afford to lose it is pitching. 

    Reply
  8. UWRyan

    13 years ago

    Predictable-_-, I think its a good trade, but i did kind of wish for the mystery team!

    Reply
  9. kast2L

    13 years ago

    god damnit now the braves have to face Gio!? he’s K rate will only go up now… 

    Reply
  10. LUWahooNatFan

    13 years ago

    Cole, Peacock, Norris, and Milone.. I’m actually happy Hood isn’t included

    Good job Rizzo

    Reply
    • oleosmirf 2

      13 years ago

      never heard of Norris but wow does that guy look good on paper. Granted the BA was very low this year but extremely high walk rate, has power and fantastic at throwing runners out.

      Reply
      • natsnation21

        13 years ago

        However he was useless to the Nats, who have a glut of catchers anyway.

        Reply
  11. Snoochies8

    13 years ago

    too bad no destin hood, but i like the deal

    Reply
  12. Dolph Ziggler

    13 years ago

    Wow, what a deal. Could be a solid 1-2-3 combo if Gio adjusts properly to the NL and Stras stays healthy. I like the Nats chances for a 2nd place finish or even a wild card if they can get Prince. With the phillies getting older this team may be a force in the next few years. I’ll be rooting for em.

    P.S. When the heck are the Yanks going to get some pitching help. I’ve been very patient with, “Plan B”

    Reply
    • Anonymous Mcgee

      13 years ago

      Why didn’t they just keep these guys?  

      Reply
      • Nicholas

        13 years ago

        Because they suck. Millone throws 85 with nothing but a
        changeup. Peacock is a 2-pitch pitcher with bad command. Norris can’t
        hit the broad side of a barn. The only one with any iota of talent is
        Cole and he hasn’t even pitched above low-A ball. Billy Beane is a
        disgrace. What a terrible haul. RIzzo wins big.

        Reply
        • Marky

          13 years ago

          Sickles reports:

          3) A.J. Cole, RHP, Grade B+. I really believe in his upside. Needs to build stamina and refine his changeup, but if it comes together he could be a Top 20 pitching prospect next year, perhaps more.

          4) Brad Peacock, RHP, Grade B: Borderline B+. Still has some command issues, but his ERAs finally caught up with his components and his overall potential in 2011. Will be ready before Cole but his upside is not quite as high. Future 2/3 starter if all works out.

          6) Derek Norris, C, Grade B: Loads of power, walks, and scouting reports on his defense are getting more positive each year. Ranking may seem high for such a low batting average, but I see him as a Mike Napoli/Mickey Tettleton type who can be productive even with a low average.

          9) Tom Milone, LHP, Grade B-: At some point, the radar guns stop mattering. The guy can simply pitch. He has little margin for error, but he will probably have a better career than hundreds of guys who throw 10 MPH harder.

          Sickles reports > your mindless, thoughtless sh!t-talking.

          Reply
          • Justin Whitlock

            13 years ago

            Brilliant right up, thanks Pete!

            Reply
      • Thomas W

        13 years ago

        because they were surplus and they think they are ready to compete and build a fanbase now

        Reply
    • Vmmercan

      13 years ago

      It’s expensive but you won’t get any special surprises, you should stick with it-

      Oh, wait, never mind.

      Reply
    • bonds2425

      13 years ago

      When I read this I thought of a different “plan B”

      Reply
    • drjayphd

      13 years ago

      Yeah, I’ve gotta admit, if the Nationals get Fielder, I like their
      chances in the division almost as much as your chances of winning the
      WWE or World Heavyweight Championship. Or both. Raw’s bringing Smackdown
      guys on the show, you could take their title too.

      Reply
  13. start_wearing_purple

    13 years ago

    Good.

    Reply
  14. joeybw

    13 years ago

    Whatever. Bailey will be going to Boston any second now, if they had any actual interest, it was only to raise Boston’s price.

    Reply
    • 0bsessions

      13 years ago

      Your pessimism is strangely reminiscent of Randy Quaid in Major League 2.

      The Rays could give up like 1% of their MiLB talent pool and get Bailey.

      Reply
  15. Topshelf Nick

    13 years ago

    Overpaid. While he’s a decent guy in the rotation to contend in the next few years, a guy like Edwin Jackson is still available and could had done 90% of the task. I know the NL East is filled with power LH hitters but that is too much given up.

    Reply
  16. Thomas W

    13 years ago

    Should gone after Garza, they could have kept Cole.

    Reply
    • FacelessGeneralManager

      13 years ago

      i think the reason for this is the money and control.

      Reply
  17. nats2012

    13 years ago

    Yes, and Espinosa and Storen stay put!!!!!!!!!!! Plus Destin Hood!!!!

    Reply
    • Fifty_Five

      13 years ago

      If I were the Nats I would have rather taken out two of those guys and plugged in Espinosa. Those K’s are gonna catch up to him

      Reply
  18. Pawsdeep

    13 years ago

    The Nats gave up a metric ton, but they will have a very nasty top of the rotation. Granted their starters stay healthy, next year could be a wry exciting year for them, especially if Harper makes his debut.

    This could make the nationals very good for quite some time. Their starting staff is well beyond solid.

    Reply
  19. Guest 5661

    13 years ago

    WOW! That’s a nice haul!

    Brad Peacock, A.J. Cole AND Derek Norris, plus Tom Milone?!?

    I think I might I like this package even more than the ones they got for Mulder, Haren and Swisher.

    Reply
    • Anonymous Mcgee

      13 years ago

      Not even that…I think this is the best haul for any player, ever.  I seriously can’t remember anyone getting back 3 top starting pitching prospects + another player for 1.  This one will go down in the record books.

      Reply
      • grownice

        13 years ago

         Lmao slow down there…

        Reply
      • vtadave

        13 years ago

        Pedro Martinez was a pretty good haul for Delino DeShields.

        Reply
      • Marky

        13 years ago

        Trading Mark Teixeira to Atlanta pretty much turned Texas from a joke to the best team in baseball. That trade destroys any trade I’ve ever seen, including this one.

        Reply
        • MB923

          13 years ago

          Atlanta made 2 horrible trades with Teixiera. The one they traded when they got him, and then Teixeira for Casey Kotchman lmao. 

          Reply
        • melonis_rex

          13 years ago

          As an A’s fan, that trade still makes me sad. WHY did that happen. 

          Also, the Angels trade. The draft pick from Tex turned into Mike Trout. 

          Reply
          • Guest 5599

            13 years ago

            The Braves hurt us a little bit during those Teixeira trades also. They could have taken Kendrys Morales out of the AL West for us. He was who Anaheim wanted to give them for Teixeira, but the Braves held out for Casey Kotchman!

            Reply
      • padresfuture

        13 years ago

        The Padres got 2 top 100 prospects, may be top 50 when this years rankings come out… for Mike Adams.

        Reply
  20. Anonymous Mcgee

    13 years ago

    Beane murdered on this one.  The Massacre.

    Reply
  21. Marky

    13 years ago

    Pretty fair deal for both sides. Not mad.

    Reply
    • FacelessGeneralManager

      13 years ago

      So you actually like this deal? even without rendon.

      I can’t help but agree, i wish we could have gone with a lesser pitcher than milone tho.

      Reply
  22. LifelongMets

    13 years ago

    The Nats just won the Wild Card. The Braves can’t top this rotation even with Kimbrel & Friends in the back of that bullpen…

    Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      13 years ago

      that division is really getting tough

      Reply
      • Fifty_Five

        13 years ago

        Poor Mets

        Reply
        • MB923

          13 years ago

          They still exist?

          Reply
  23. Sniderlover

    13 years ago

    What an overpayment. Awful deal for the Nationals IMO.

    Love the haul for the A’s though. 

    Reply
  24. YaGottaBelieve11

    13 years ago

    Glad someone finally pointed out his control issues. Until he cuts down on those walks I’m not a believer.

    Reply
    • Jose Zepeda

      13 years ago

      But i thought Yagottabelive!!!

      Reply
      • YaGottaBelieve11

        13 years ago

        iGottaBelieve in my Mets, not Gio haha

        Reply
    • not_brooks

      13 years ago

      Finally?

      Where have you been? Literally everyone writing about Gio has pointed out his league leading walks and his 4+ BB/9 rate every single time his name has come up.

      Reply
      • YaGottaBelieve11

        13 years ago

        Well then I guess I wasn’t reading up on it as much as I thought. With all the hype around a potential Gio trade people at least to me seemed like they forgot all about his walk issues and his second half last year.

        Unless he improves Billy robbed Washington

        Reply
  25. The Xekutioner

    13 years ago

    lol

    Reply
  26. LUWahooNatFan

    13 years ago

    After this trade the Nationals still have Harper, Rendon, Goodwin, Meyer, Purke, Solis, Hood, and Taylor in their system

    The future is bright in D.C.

    Reply
    • FacelessGeneralManager

      13 years ago

      The thing IMO that made this possible for us is our draft list. We can replace these guys, with purke and meyer. 

      It really hurts tho that we gave up all three, especially two that are major league ready. Im pretty excited for this one but can’t help but be nervous.

      Reply
      • LUWahooNatFan

        13 years ago

        Lot of risk involved with this kind of trade, prospects are no guarantee to pan out however, I think it will help out Washington more in the long run then the Athletics.. I just can’t see them competing any time soon.

        Reply
  27. bigpat

    13 years ago

    I think that was too much for the Nats to give up but at least they got their man I guess. I thought it would be two stud prospects and two average guys. Nats should ask for something else in return because even though I don’t consider myself a prospect guru, those are four or their top prospects. 

    Reply
  28. Randy

    13 years ago

    wow why not any bats we have a ton of pitching im not happy with this trade did not mind peacock,cole and norris but should have got another hitter

    Reply
    • Fifty_Five

      13 years ago

      Norris is a Mike Napoli clone. But I see where you’re coming from, Hood would have been nice

      Reply
  29. J.j. Miller

    13 years ago

    red sox fans bailey deal soon, beware

    Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      If Beane gets Middlebrooks for Bailey can we all agree he’s still got it? 

      Reply
      • not_brooks

        13 years ago

        Considering the haul he just got for Gio, I think it’s safe to say that he’s still got it.

        Getting Parker in the Cahill deal wasn’t bad either.

        Reply
      • notsureifsrs

        13 years ago

        if that happens, i will say those words myself

        at his funeral

        Reply
      • Nicholas

        13 years ago

        No, because Middlebrooks has the same hit tool issues that Norris has, and as a result, will most likely not pan out. And yes, I’m a Red Sox fan. Kalish or Reddick would be much better for Oakland.

        Reply
        • mainesox

          13 years ago

          “And yes, I’m a Red Sox fan.”

          I’m shocked.  No really.

          Reply
        • EarlyMorningBoxscore

          13 years ago

          You do realize that Middlebrooks is the Sox number 1 ranked prospect this year….and that he killed in Portland last year right?

          Reply
      • Snoochies8

        13 years ago

        if beane can get middlebrooks out of bailey…i will kiss him on the mouth haha that’s be a stroke of jenius (spelled on purpose)

        Reply
  30. Todd Boss

    13 years ago

    Wow that’s a lot of the National’s farm system depth.  A lot.

    Reply
  31. nats2012

    13 years ago

    It may be 4 prospects but we paid much less than the Reds paid for Latos.

    Reply
    • Tko11

      13 years ago

      And you got a far worse pitcher.

      Reply
      • nats2012

        13 years ago

        Yeah OK.

        Reply
        • Tom

          13 years ago

          You did get a worse pitcher, I wouldn’t say far though.

          Reply
          • Marky

            13 years ago

            MLBTR commentators wildly, massively, going overboard with how much they think Gio Gonzalez is not very good at pitching while ignoring such key factors as facts and stats and not believing in progressing? Yup, par for the course. 

            Gio is good, this deal is not a whitewash but they are getting a good pitcher, walks arent everything, I wonder what all these nerds thought of Randy Johnson back in the day….

            Reply
            • notsureifsrs

              13 years ago

              the days before his K-rate went from 8 to 10 to 12 and his walk rate went from 5 to 3 to 2?

              they probably said “his k-rate will not go from 8 to 12 and his walk rate will not go from 5 to 2, because that never happens”

              because it never does. good comp though

              Reply
            • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

              13 years ago

              lol did you just compare Gio to Randy Johnson lolololol

              Reply
    • Franl Edwardo

      13 years ago

      it may be less than the reds paid, but they also got a lesser and more inconsistent pitcher at a much steeper price.  Hopefully, for Nats fans, he doesnt turn into oliver perez, very similar pitchers

      Reply
    • renegadeisback

      13 years ago

      Not really. I’d rather have this prospect package than the one the Pads got. And I’d MUCH rather have Latos than Gio.

      Reply
    • triple_play_baseball

      13 years ago

      Latos > Gio

      Reply
      • rundmc1981

        13 years ago

        Yes, but Latos goes to hitting-friendly park, while Gonzalez doesn’t as much. And Gonzalez is LH in a division with quite a few LH bats (mostly on PHI).

        Reply
  32. Alex 18

    13 years ago

    Holy cow, that’s a HUGE haul for the A’s. The Nats will be great with Gio, but they gave up a ton.

    Reply
  33. Jesse Webber

    13 years ago

    The Nationals now have very little pitching depth. I wouldn’t have done it with both Peacock and Cole.

    Reply
    • Fifty_Five

      13 years ago

      *and Milone

      Reply
    • Snoochies8

      13 years ago

      you guys still have solis, meyer, purke, and ray…you’re still in good shape for the future

      Reply
  34. Rabbitov

    13 years ago

    The Reds gave up a ton to get Latos, but I saw the value and reason in that trade. This is just bonkers.  Nats, what were you thinking?

    Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      That they will have a big 3 of Stras-Gio-Zimm controlled for the next 4 years?

      Reply
      • Rabbitov

        13 years ago

        Its pretty on paper, but I don’t think a pitcher with control problems and an almost 4 era outside of Oakland was worth what was given up.  

        Would I want him on my team? Hells yes, but right player for the right price.  Nats keep going all in on flashy players. 

        Reply
  35. mainesox

    13 years ago

    Thank Jesus.

    Hopefully now the Sox are back in on Oswalt.

    Reply
    • Roy-Z

      13 years ago

      Looks like the best fit for both the Sox and Os.

      Reply
  36. Nicholas

    13 years ago

    How is that a HUGE haul? Millone throws 85 with nothing but a
    changeup. Peacock is a 2-pitch pitcher with bad command. Norris can’t
    hit the broad side of a barn. The only one with any iota of talent is
    Cole and he hasn’t even pitched above low-A ball. Billy Beane is a
    disgrace. What a terrible haul.

    Reply
    • LUWahooNatFan

      13 years ago

      I hope you’re right 

      Reply
    • Matthew T

      13 years ago

      You should post this again in case somebody missed it.

      Reply
    • mainesox

      13 years ago

      Saying it repeatedly isn’t going to make it true.

      Reply
    • sports33

      13 years ago

      That makes three times you’ve posted this exact same comment.

      We get it.

      Reply
    • oaktownmagic

      13 years ago

      Quit spewing the same garbage over and over.

      Reply
    • Zach Bayer

      13 years ago

      Peacock’s 2.9 BB/9 in the minors last year suggests that he has at least average command.  Peacock’s development of a third pitch will likely determine whether he is a good starter or good reliever.  Norris had his worst year in the minors last year, and still had an .813 OPS in AA as a 22 year-old.  Next year will be a big year for Norris, but the ceiling is high.  Cole is a pretty decent pitching prospect.  And Milone had a 9.69 K/BB ratio in AAA last year.  They may have ignored the scouts a little bit too much on this one, but it’s a pretty decent risk for Oakland when all they gave up was Gio Gonzalez, a guy who will never have good enough control to be an elite starter.

      Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      13 years ago

      Jamie Moyer made a career out of throwing 85 with elite control.

      Reply
  37. Tom Gardner

    13 years ago

    Is the Nats farm system that deep to give up that much for a mid of the rotation starter???

    Reply
    • jhfdssdaf

      13 years ago

      Nope.

      Reply
    • Rabbitov

      13 years ago

      The Nats farm system had a really impressive top 6 or 7. Not anymore. 

      Reply
  38. Marky

    13 years ago

    You gotta think when Brett Anderson comes back from TJ if he stays healthy he will be next to go.

    Reply
  39. Kyle_W

    13 years ago

    A very nice haul for the A’s. It makes up a little for the Cahill deal.

    Reply
    • Rabbitov

      13 years ago

      More than a little, this trade is criminal. 

      Reply
  40. Kyle_W

    13 years ago

    I think he’s a little better than mid-rotation, but still think the Nationals went off the deep end a bit.

    Reply
  41. catch21_2

    13 years ago

    I’m just glad I’m not an A’s fan.  Even as an outsider this is tough to watch.

    Reply
  42. Roy-Z

    13 years ago

    I am glad for Gio’s sake he ended up in the NL and not the AL East. Let’s be honest, he would have been wrecked here. Glad he’s not on the Jays and Sox and that he won’t be (nearly as) shellshocked.

    Reply
  43. Triple Hawpes Brewed

    13 years ago

    And the NL East gets even stronger…definitely the 2nd toughest division behind the AL East.

    Reply
    • nm344

      13 years ago

      Can’t argue that.

      Reply
  44. NYBravosFan10

    13 years ago

    Great deal for both sides!! How did Rizzo weasel his way out of losing Espinosa or Desmond?

    Reply
    • CardsEagles1489

      13 years ago

      I was honestly surprised neither of those two were included as well..

      Reply
    • Brv Rocks

      13 years ago

      I don’t think anyone would want Desmond.

      Reply
  45. Tko11

    13 years ago

    As a Red Sox fan I love it!! Thank you Nationals! That was almost a disaster for the Sox. But yea Nationals got raped in that trade. I don’t understand the Nationals at all, why does it seem like they are rushing to improve?? Last year they signed Werth to a terrible deal and now this trade. They have a nice young core already, just wait a few more years and let everyone develop. The players they traded could be in the major leagues in a few years. 

    Reply
    • A_Shoe

      13 years ago

      Gio’s 26…. It’s not like they traded a bunch of guys for a pitcher in his mid 30s…

      Reply
      • Tko11

        13 years ago

        26 but hes not great by any means. 

        Reply
  46. Joe Schroeder

    13 years ago

    Excellent trade for the Nats- each one of those prospect(s) ceilings traded away are w/o question one draft away from replacing in the system! The Nats are contenders for a Div Banner, IMO.

    Reply
    • nm344

      13 years ago

      Maybe in a year or two.  Certainly not with the loaded Phils still there.

      Reply
  47. Andrew T

    13 years ago

    as a marlins fan I love the trade

    Reply
    • CardsEagles1489

      13 years ago

      Why? The Nats now have a better rotation than Miami does..

      Reply
      • nm344

        13 years ago

        But they probably weakened their organization as a whole.

        Reply
  48. Zac Sutton

    13 years ago

    Anderson has to stay healthy first – He has his lowest value right now.  He’ll be in OAK through mid-season, at least.

    Reply
    • TheWoodyD

      13 years ago

      Mainly because he’ll still be injured until mid-season, at least.

      Reply
  49. Ben

    13 years ago

    You’ve got to be kidding me Nationals.
    Edwin Jackson Combined WAR last two years, 7.6.
    Gio Gonzalez? 6.7.

    Don’t be surprised if Peacock matches Gonzalez’ production very soon. Not to mention, he’s only the third best prospect in this deal.

    What an offseason for the AL West. Billy Beane does it again.

    Reply
    • FacelessGeneralManager

      13 years ago

      i agree, way to much, I’m ok with peacock going. But only if milone and cole don’t.

      Reply
  50. Shawn Herlihy

    13 years ago

    Hey Nicholas. On behalf of everyone ever.

    SHUT UP ALREADY!

    Reply
  51. Zac Sutton

    13 years ago

    Bollocks.  That was in response to someone saying Anderson was next to go.

    Reply
  52. Tony Matias

    13 years ago

    And the saddest part about all this is that the Mariners will still come in behind the A’s.

    Reply
  53. Tony DiQuattro

    13 years ago

    Even if the A’s get a few great prospects, they’re still prospects and it’s depressing to see that they completely failed the one year that they really went for it.

    Reply
  54. rundmc1981

    13 years ago

    Jair Jurrjens’ stock just went up. Thanks, Nats. 

    (He’s healthy and has been clocked in the mid-90’s recently in instructional league throwing).

    Reply
    • hallwagner

      13 years ago

      oh jurrjens, the one pitcher the nats rocked with regularity. i really hope he stays on the braves for the nats sake

      Reply
    • kcgregory

      13 years ago

      If he’s so great and healthy then you would want to keep him, right?

      Reply
      • Diego Cerezo

        13 years ago

        No, you want to trade him because you have the best pitching depth in the mayors and need help in offense.

        Reply
        • kcgregory

          13 years ago

          I’m just saying why him?  Because the most likely to underperform going forward, but when since he’s on the block (some) Braves fan continue to claim he’s an ace and prop him up with nonsense (mid 90s fastball in instructional league).  (some) Braves fans continue to identify him as the most likely to be traded and then want the moon for him.  Can’t have it both ways.  The fact that he’s brought up in a discussion of Gonzalez is absurd b/c it seems to indicate the packages should be even remotely similar.

          Reply
    • nm344

      13 years ago

      Gotta love the delusional Braves fans.  So when does the Braves “Decade of Dominance” begin anyway?

      Reply
    • Brv Rocks

      13 years ago

      Very true!!  The Braves should be able to get a nice package of prospects for Jurrjens since teams seem to be willing to overpay for starting pitchers.

      Reply
  55. Thomas W

    13 years ago

    If they throw Rendon on that pile they probably get Latos

    Reply
    • FrankTheFunkasaurusRex

      13 years ago

      If they threw that pile to San Diego they probably would’ve gotten Latos

      Reply
  56. MetsEventually

    13 years ago

    Happy that the Nats made such a poor move. Marlins and Nats will never beat the Braves, let alone the Phillies. 

    Reply
    • RVANatsMama

      13 years ago

      Bold words from a Mets fan.

      Reply
  57. Gumby65

    13 years ago

    I have seen this before.
                            -Mark Mulder

    Reply
    • jhfdssdaf

      13 years ago

      Bah.. its not like that Dan Haren kid the Cards traded for Mulder ever amounted to anything.

      Reply
  58. Andrew Weiss

    13 years ago

    I am a nats 

    Reply
  59. Andrew Weiss

    13 years ago

    I am a nats fan and am now quite ill.   This is a terrible deal.

    Reply
    • NWDC

      13 years ago

      It’s not a terrible deal at all, relax.  I’m bummed about Peacock but honestly nobody else in that deal worries me. 

      Reply
  60. Marky

    13 years ago

    As an A’s fan, I don’t care who stays or goes, I just want us to sign Brandon McCarthy to a 10 year deal. Via his twitter:

    “Day 1 of Spring Training is going to be a meet and greet party with all of us in name tags it seems.”

    Reply
    • Snoochies8

      13 years ago

      hahaha so true

      Reply
  61. Aaron Spacher

    13 years ago

    To me this trade means that theyre going for it in 2012…and wouldn’t be surprised if Prince is a nationals soon. As a nationals fan I think they gave up too much much for gio (if they wanted to sell the farm they should have called the seattle up and gave them those four plus 3 more more felix)

    Reply
  62. brett m.

    13 years ago

    I think that this is a good deal for both sides. Washington traded from a position of depth. They have a whole bunch of young arms in their system. While it may hurt, they can absorb the loss of pitchers that werent going to be in the majors until next year as regulars. Gio is the top of the rotation that they need. It is a major haul but from the Nationals perspective, it was a bold but good move. Norris was about 4th on the depth chart and would only have gotten to the majors if he switched to 1st. This trade makes sense from both sides

    Reply
  63. Andrew Weiss

    13 years ago

    And what a shock, he is much worse away from Oakland

    Reply
    • Daniel Thompson

      13 years ago

      Check out his career lines

      Reply
  64. slasher016 2

    13 years ago

    Seems to me the Reds and the Nats gave up a similar match of prospects to acquire a young cost controlled starter.  But I think the Reds got the better pitcher.

    Reply
    • straightuphonestguy

      13 years ago

      Reds got a better pitcher, an extra year of control, and a year of Latos at the minimum salary. Curious as to who got the better package between the Padres and A’s.

      Reply
      • hallwagner

        13 years ago

        i’d say the padres did. potentian #1 starter (volquez), 1b capable of hitting .300-30-100 (alonso), potential closer (boxberger) potential above average starting C (grandal). a’s got #2 starter (peacock) back of the rotation guy (milone) potential #1 (cole), and a low ba high power catcher who could either be an all star for the next 20 years or do terribly and never be seen in the majors again (norris) actually i’d say its about equal

        Reply
        • straightuphonestguy

          13 years ago

          They don’t seem too far off by your assessment, although I’m suspicious of Alonso hitting thirty home runs playing half his games in Petco.

          Reply
          • jhfdssdaf

            13 years ago

            And if Volquez was ever going to reach his potential, he would have done so by now.

            Reply
            • Beersy 2

              13 years ago

              Black, Balsley and Petco would have something to say about that.  I’m not saying Cy Young year or anything, but I could see Volquez having his best years in the next couple before he prices himself out of San Diego.

              Reply
          • padresfuture

            13 years ago

            Other than Volquez, the Padres got 3 prospects with high ceilings and are less risky than Cole and Peacock. I give the Padres the edge, but not by a big margin.

            Reply
            • Mario Saavedra

              13 years ago

              Which is fair considering Latos is better than Gio, but not by a big margin.

              Reply
      • Beersy 2

        13 years ago

        I’d say both the Padres and A’s got what they needed.  Alonso and Grandal have that line drive stroke needed for position players at Petco and the A’s added pitching to their farm system.  As we all know the last time the A’s were god they had a pretty good rotation with 3 #1’s.

        Reply
        • straightuphonestguy

          13 years ago

          Haha, I see Disqus is posting messages all over the place like when I was trying to respond to you in the Mat Latos trade thread. Not at all down on the Padres’ haul by the way, just was curious who the consensus “winner” might be between Oakland and San Diego. 

          Reply
  65. nm344

    13 years ago

    So are they going to call their TV Network NatGio?

    Reply
  66. LUWahooNatFan

    13 years ago

    The Nationals have quite a nice young core when you look at the big picture: Strasburg, Gio, Zimmmermann, Clippard, Storen, Ramos, Espinosa, Zimmerman to go along with a farm system that has Harper, Rendon, Goodwin, Meyer, Purke, Taylor, and Hood..

    The Nationals draft well, take a look at the players that were sent over:

    Peacock-41st round
    Cole- 4th round
    Norris- 4th round
    Milone-10th round…

    It won’t take the Nationals long to get it up to the level it was at prior to this trade.

    Reply
    • kurtits

      13 years ago

      With the new CBA it will be.

      Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      Eh, I wouldnt put much stock into what round of the draft they were obtained in, Cole went late because he wanted too large a bonus, Peacock was too young and not a sure thing to sign etc

      Reply
      • LUWahooNatFan

        13 years ago

        Who’s to say Meyer and Purke aren’t the equivalent of Peacock and Cole, if not better? 

        Reply
  67. Snoochies8

    13 years ago

    time for the andrew bailey bidding to start! hopefully it becomes a high priced bidding war.

    Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      BRING ME MIDDLEBROOKS OR BRING ME DEATH* 

      *Death can be brought in the form of a cheeseburger.

      Reply
  68. Derek Gould

    13 years ago

    noooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nats made a HUGE mistake

    Reply
  69. zachs4

    13 years ago

    What a job done by Billy Beane, great haul my man

    Reply
  70. optionn

    13 years ago

    The Nationals are now officially contenders.  They have to be because they have a 126 million dollar player out in right field who hits .229 with 14 homeruns.

    Reply
    • hallwagner

      13 years ago

      *232 with 20 home runs

      Reply
  71. FacelessGeneralManager

    13 years ago

    Pretty excited and nervous about this one. Could go either way. Milone, peacock and cole is ALOT. Hopefully only Cole pans out, and only cuz i like him. I view norris as just the throw in piece since he has been all but gone for two years if the  nats made any trade.

    Only thing i can’t understand is why no outfielder instead of milone. And why the Nats give up two MLB ready pitchers.

    Hopefully this doesn’t end up being the Bartolo Colon deal, which in my opinion is the worst ever!!!.   Cliff Lee, Grady Sizemore, and Brandon Phillips. Wow that was bad.

    Reply
  72. alxn

    13 years ago

    The A’s have a lot of young MLB-ready pitching. Spring training should be very interesting.

    Reply
  73. Edgar4evar

    13 years ago

    Go to hell, Rizzo. This is terrible. Those prospects are liable to produce more WAR in a season by 2013 than Gio will.  He’s a slightly above-average pitcher. You basically traded all that talent for four years’ worth of the 2011 version of Jason Marquis. As a Nats and an M’s fan (I know…I’m a masochist) Rizzo has managed to hurt both my favorite teams in one fell swoop.

    Reply
    • Lefty

      13 years ago

      A Nats and M’s fan??? Really? That’s a very interesting combination.

      Reply
    • johnnycomelately9

      13 years ago

      You’re dumb.  Great trade for your team today.

      Reply
  74. Lefty

    13 years ago

    You gotta hand it to Rizzo, he doesn’t fool around. They wanted Gio Gonzalez and they got him. Now, they might have overpaid for him, just like they did for Jayson Werth (obviously overpaid in a different way) still he went out and made a bold statement today and they didn’t give up Storen! Hey if they decide to go out and sign Prince Fielder that team could become legit contenders!

    Now the Orioles on the other hand seem to be standing around and talking by the coffee maching and not much else!

    Duquette is full of “Hot Air” and that’s about it. At least it appears to me that way so far. Come on Duquette do something!

    Reply
    • LifelongMets

      13 years ago

      They are already legit contenders in the East. The Phillies are getting old, the Braves have some rotation issues, the Marlins will be very good if they can stay healthy, and the Mets are just terrible. I’m guessing that if all goes well for all the potential contenders (Phils, Braves, Marlins, and Nats,) we’re looking at 4/5 teams being over .500.

      On your Duquette statement, maybe he will sign Manny to another 8-year deal…

      Reply
      • Lefty

        13 years ago

        On your Duquette statement, maybe he will sign Manny to another 8-year deal… Thanks for cheering me up, LOL.

        While you got me to laugh, I am the one who is supposed to dispensing the sarcasm around here….

        Seriously though, as for your Mets will compete, but they have a lot of issues, the rotation and the newly minted bullpen. Oy Ve.

        Reply
      • Zach Bayer

        13 years ago

        The Braves don’t have rotation issues.  Beachy, Minor, Teheran, Delgado, Hanson, Hudson, Vizcaino, and Jurrjens if they don’t trade him.  Where they have issues is at shortstop, another outfielder, and getting Heyward to hit.

        Reply
  75. LA

    13 years ago

    They are only Prospects and “could” potentially work out. But, giving 4 players for Gio is ridiculous!!

    Reply
  76. LUWahooNatFan

    13 years ago

    Sign Fielder and the Nationals could compete for the division

    Reply
  77. Justin Whitlock

    13 years ago

    Great, he is a solid upside cheap lefty that can rack up innings… BUT SERIOUSLY, Cole, Milone, Norris, AND Peacock… Milone could possibly end up being exactly what Gio is next year… Milone’s minors are sick and his first call up went fine. Peacock is #34 in BA America’s newish rankings. Norris was #72 coming into the year. Cole is rapidly climbing up the top 100. Giving up two top 100 and a package makes sense, but four!!! This is not a surefire superstar by any stretch of the imagination. 

    Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      His ceiling is a superstar though, if he gets his BB/9 under 3 there will be literally nothing to knock him about, and he’s way young enough to figure that out and improve his game. 

      Reply
    • LUWahooNatFan

      13 years ago

      Cole is the most likely to reach his potential imo, unless Peacock develops a 3rd pitch he won’t be more than a solid 3 or even a back of the bullpen closer/setup, Milone is just Lannan-lite, and Norris is definitely not a Top 100 prospect anymore

      Reply
  78. BrandonDbacks

    13 years ago

    Two notes:
    1. The NL East, outside of the Mets will have 4 playoff contenders and be very competitive.
    2. Jarrod Parker and Brad Peacock will be a nice future duo.

    Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      AJ Cole & Sonny Gray have ceilings as aces too. Damn Billy.

      Reply
      • Snoochies8

        13 years ago

        also dan straily could end up being a solid #2 or #3 pitcher in bigs, he’s legit

        Reply
        • Marky

          13 years ago

          Its wild to think that the A’s have McCarthy, Anderson, Braden, Moscoso, Ross & Outman plus whatever FA they take a flier on….all of those guys could get traded too. 

          I’m totally down with getting rid of everyone except Weeks and shooting for 2014/15. This is a fantastic base to start from.

          Reply
          • Snoochies8

            13 years ago

            If the A’s were to trade all of them (except anderson) they’d still have a rotation of Anderson, Peacock, Parker, Gray, and Milone, with Banwart, Straily, and AJ Griffin waiting in the wings, definitely something to look forward to

            Reply
  79. Marky

    13 years ago

    A’s top 10 prospect list looks like this now:

    1. Jarod Parker
    2. A.J. Cole
    3. Michael Choice
    4. Brad Peacock
    5. Sony Gray
    6. Grant Green
    7. Derek Norris
    8. Tom Milone
    9. Chris Carter
    10. Yordy Cabrera

    If you saw the top 10 from last year, this is a MONUMENTAL turnaround. Praise Jah–I mean Beane.

    Reply
    • LUWahooNatFan

      13 years ago

      A.J. Cole has the potential to be a solid #1 or 2  in the future

      Peacock, I’m not sold that he can be more than a solid 3 or a really good setup or closer

      Norris hasn’t really been the same since his injury, it’ll be interesting to see what he can do this year

      Milone reminds me of a John Lannan with a bit more accuracy, he’ll be a solid 4-5 at the end of the day

      This from a Nationals fan who pays very close attention to their prospects, or in this case, former prospects

      Reply
    • AndySTL

      13 years ago

      Grant Green at 6???…didnt he get moved to CF and now is having trouble hitting?…

      Reply
      • Marky

        13 years ago

        AA is the hardest minor league to hit in, and a CF with 20+ HR potential are rare birds indeed. He’s still a top 10 guy even with just ok numbers at AA, easily. You have to figure some of his troubles stem from learning a new position too. Can’t wait to see what he will do at AAA this year. 

        Reply
        • AndySTL

          13 years ago

          not saying he isnt a stud…just that he has regressed somewhat

          Reply
          • Marky

            13 years ago

            Yeah a lot of guys dont hit AA well, its usually their first taste of offspeed pitches, but he wasnt like, terrible. There’s a decent chance he will have a good year at AAA in 2012. He’s not top 5 anymore, but I think 6 is fair for him.

            Reply
    • notsureifsrs

      13 years ago

      huge sleeper: vicmal de la cruz

      Reply
      • Snoochies8

        13 years ago

        also another sleeper: dan straily (154 k’s/40 bb’s, 3.10 FIP, low-mid 90’s fastball in hitter friendly Cal League)

        Reply
      • Marky

        13 years ago

        Agreed but he’s 17, a gnats wing too early to put him in there.

        Reply
        • notsureifsrs

          13 years ago

          agree, but a 17 y/o who walks more than he strikes out in his first pro season? swoon

          Reply
          • Marky

            13 years ago

            Yup, Beane was not lying when he said his goal was to have a beastly 2015 team. He definitely is going to. 

            Just wish he’d buy some FAs to make the team watchable in the meantime :/

            Reply
            • Guest 5657

              13 years ago

              It doesn’t seem like he has much choice, as far as free agents go. As we all know, not many players (especially position players) like to play in the Coliseum. And ownership isn’t gonna let Beane spend any more than MLB makes them spend (per revenue sharing requirements). So they may have to just do something similar to what they did with Ben Sheets in 2010, and offer someone like Oswalt a ridiculous amount of money on a one-year deal.

              Reply
              • Marky

                13 years ago

                I just hope its an outfielder next time.

                I wonder if Carlos Beltran would take a 1 year $18MM deal? He was traded for Wheeler last year, if Beane was shrewd enough he’s try and pull the same move, sign him and then trade him at the deadline to a contender.

                Reply
                • Guest 5655

                  13 years ago

                  Beltran would be nice to have. But I seriously doubt he’d accept a one-year deal to play in a place like the Coliseum, even if he was offered an astronomical amount.

                  In my opinion, someone like Oswalt would work out better, anyway, since he could mentor all the new young arms. Plus Carter and Taylor could finally get extended auditions, along with Miller, Sweeney, Cowgill and Mitchell. Plus they’d still have plenty of room for Choice, just in case he decides to go atomic in early spring, and force his way onto the roster.

                  Reply
                • Phillies_Aces35

                  13 years ago

                  I think that’s something he’d definitely consider but one of the reasons why the Mets got Wheeler was because they ate Beltran’s salary.

                  The return for Oakland wouldn’t be nearly that. (obviously Beltran’s off the board now).

                  Reply
      • Guest 5596

        13 years ago

        Good call. I’m impressed that you know that name. He turned 18 a month ago, so hopefully he’ll get to play in the Arizona Rookie League this year, or maybe even short-season Vermont.

        Reply
    • Snoochies8

      13 years ago

      just missing the cut: Josh Whitaker, AJ Griffin, Vicmal de la Cruz, Renato Nunez, and BA Vollmuth

      Reply
  80. maxErnstmankini

    13 years ago

    What would Pineda fetch? 
    Felix?

    Reply
    • padresfuture

      13 years ago

      I believe it was Dave Cameron that wrote an article a few months back discussing what felix would be worth and that it could be worthwhile to consider trading him to add hords of offensive talent. He was laughed at and now we see other teams doing similar type moves. Pineda should have a similar value to Latos and Felix I would assume would return a teams top several prospects and maybe more.

      Reply
      • maxErnstmankini

        13 years ago

        I’ll have to look at Cameron’s ideas. Z has stockpiled the Ms with tons of pitching – makes sense to move some of it for a 3B, SS, and possibly LF. I agree with you that Pineda has to be valued around Latos and Gio. 

        Reply
  81. mozelpuffski

    13 years ago

    i was wishing he ended up with red sox – damn it! on that note: Thanks AA for not dolling out what would have been requested from our system. Now sign Beltran, Oswalt, and throw in a reliever.

    Reply
  82. Snoochies8

    13 years ago

    where does the a’s system rank now? wow

    Reply
    • Marky

      13 years ago

      Definitely moves from 20’s to top 10. Parker, Cole, Gray & Peacock are a formidable batch of SPs. If Beane can turn Bailey into Middlebrooks, the A’s will be in a heckuva lot better shape than they were a year ago.

      Reply
  83. slider32

    13 years ago

    This is a great upgrade for the Nats, they now have three good young starters, they needed to make this deal after falling short with a few other deals. This team is going in the right direction. The A’s also did well to restock their farm, Bailey will be next maybe to the Sox.

    Reply
  84. Zach Bayer

    13 years ago

    Good point.  I think the Nationals gave up 3, maybe 4 guys with basically potential to be as valuable or more valuable than Gio Gonzalez, but give the Nationals credit for getting a solid pitcher from 2 4th round picks, a 10th rounder, and a 41st rounder.

    Reply
    • slider32

      13 years ago

      The round players are drafted is irrelivent, John Sickels rates them as B prospects not bad.

      Reply
      • Snoochies8

        13 years ago

        exactly, a couple of the A’s good sleeper prospects for next year were 24th and 25th round selections: Josh Whitaker and Dan Straily

        Reply
  85. FS54 2

    13 years ago

    Well rotation is set I guess, SS, JZ, Gio, Lannan, Wang. Might as well overpay for Fielder on a short contract and bet it all on 2012.

    Reply
    • elbeisbol

      13 years ago

      Why do people keep saying “all in for 2012”? We have Gio, Strasburg and Zimmermann under control for years. 

      Reply
  86. Marky

    13 years ago

    So you are just making crap up and trolling because you hate Beane because of the movie? Knew it. 

    Reply
  87. vtadave

    13 years ago

    Please just go away.

    Reply
  88. Guest 5658

    13 years ago

    Okay, I don’t LOVE what we had to give up..but some of you sound like we gave up harper and strasburg for him…

    We gave up Cole who i really like (19 year old with a 95, touching 97 mph fastball that he can command), peacock with a MAYBE #2 pitcher upside (def #3)  Milone who is MAYBE a major league starter, and Norris really isn’t a problem to trade..

    It is an overpay for sure.  But Gio still can get a lot better if he lowers that walk rate as he continues to mature.

    Reply
    • FS54 2

      13 years ago

      I am kinda worried about the walk rate. Anyways there will be crybabies no matter what Rizzo did. It is better to do it than not to do it and regret it later. We have Gio for four years, along with JZ and SS. I am looking forward to that.

      Reply
    • justme

      13 years ago

      Bold move for a team that has been bad for a while….love what there rotation looks like now…this could make them a dark horse for a wild card….and love gio been a mainstay on my fanasty team for a couple years…all that said the price was to much…three mlb future starters and as u said 2 will probably be top end starters….love how they have been building this team with quality young prospects think maybe they veered off course with what has been working…lil desperation to win something now maybe.But they are so deep in there minor league system that they probably figured they could afford to over pay to start getting some results…not a nationals fan but can relate being a cubs fan to wanting to win….so i hope this works for them love the underdog.

      Reply
      • jdr70

        13 years ago

        Peacock is not a top end starter.  Baseball America is the highest on him and they say a #3 at best.  Law sees him as a reliever or very back end guy.  If Norris & Cole become all stars then the A’s won the deal.  That’s a huge if as Norris’ stock has gone down the past two years and Cole turns 20 next week and still has a long way to go. 

        Reply
        • BayBall510

          13 years ago

          The same Keith Law who called Gio a fringe starter and possible reliever when assessing his trade to the A’s?

          Reply
          • jdr70

            13 years ago

            I just read the article and Law never said that. He referred to Peacock as a reliever or potential back end starter. Nice try though.

            Reply
            • BayBall510

              13 years ago

              Speaking of trying, perhaps you should try reading what I wrote again. I said Law called Gio a fringe starter and possible reliever after being traded “to the A’s.”
              The point being that Law is prone to mistakes and has never been a Gio proponent. In 2008, Law called Gio “at best” a No. 3 and a likely No. 4, and possible reliever when the A’s got him. He liked De Los Santos much better and saw him as a top of the rotation possibility.
              How has that analysis worked out?

              Reply
              • jdr70

                13 years ago

                LOL.  Where did I say Law can’t make mistakes?  Does that mean you invalidate anything he says and that he’s always wrong?  The guy has a pretty good track record.  

                Have a nice life. 

                Reply
                • BayBall510

                  13 years ago

                  Wow. This is what happens when you nap during reading comprehension. You’ve made this much more difficult than it needed to be. I’ll slow it down. You: Pointed out Law called Peacock a backend rotation/reliever type. Me: Saw the irony that Law used the same basic terms in his flawed 2008 trade eval on Gio, and chose to use that as a cautionary tale.
                  Cheers!

                  Reply
  89. Will Ryan

    13 years ago

    I understand that the Nationals gave up a lot but you have to consider what they have left in there system and where Gio fits. He will slot in as the #2 behind Strasburg to fill a rotation that already has Jordan Zimmerman who was dominant last year, John Lannan who is an above average 4 starter and Chien Ming Wang who started regaining his dominant form last year. They also have Matt Purke, Alex Meyer and Sammy Solis waiting in the wings as pitching prospects. I’m sure many remember Purke as the 1st rounder from Texas and the potential #1 overall pick for next year. Similarly, Solis is moving up as well showing he is a capable LHP. Meyer the other 1st rounder this year has a better fastball than Peacock and a plus slider. The Nationals are getting proven value for the next 4 years, a 3.12 ERA and 197 SO’s in the American League will definitely translate to the NL, just ask Roy Halladay how the transition has been. As for the prospects, Norris is blocked by Wilson Ramos, a future all-star, and we still have Jesus Flores lurking, a player who showed he could play before getting shoulder surgery. Peacock is a solid pitcher, but Milone looked incredibly average in his few ML starts. He has limited fastball velocity and when he misses the ball gets smacked. Cole has big time upside but how any prospects have that written about them? I remember the Pirates traded for Tim Alderson from the SFG a few years ago who was a similar age, size but had better statistics than Cole. He is currently at AA as a reliever with an ERA over 4. Many don’t pan out, that is why you get 4 prospects for 1 proven player. I think Washington wins this deal, a starter that can be an ace and a LHP, a difficult commodity to find in the MLB. 

    Reply
    • J.j. Miller

      13 years ago

      nats homer much?

      Reply
    • Phillies_Aces35

      13 years ago

      John Lannan is an above average #4 starter? He’s a fifth starter at best.

      Reply
      • Will Ryan

        13 years ago

        3.70 ERA as there #2/3 last year, I think that would make you an above average 4th starter. 

        Reply
      • FacelessGeneralManager

        13 years ago

        Wow you actually read all that?

        Reply
  90. Jay

    13 years ago

    I cant talk smack about the Nats.You guys got an ace so congrats on that.It is official my Mets will be finishing in last place

    Reply
    • Sky14

      13 years ago

      Gio is no Ace

      Reply
      • PileOfSandwich 2

        13 years ago

        It’s interesting that everyone says this. You watch him pitch or are you just one of those stat guys? He walks a few guys yes, but usually gets through the innings no problem. His stuff is great. One of the best curves in the game.

        Reply
        • Sky14

          13 years ago

          Now do not get me wrong I do not think Gio is a bad pitcher or he will not do good with the Nats, I am just saying he is not an Ace pitcher. He has good stuff but you cannot discount the stats. Baseball is after all a numbers game. He walked roughly 4 batters per 9, his h/a splits vary greatly and his FIP is close to 4. Those numbers indicate he is more like a good 2/3 than a top of the rotation guy

          Reply
          • PileOfSandwich 2

            13 years ago

            Also for most teams he isn’t an ace, but he was the A’s ace so he kinda was.

            Reply
        • FacelessGeneralManager

          13 years ago

          I hate stats so much. Just watch the guy pitch.

          Reply
      • slider32

        13 years ago

        The Nats don’t need an ace, they have Strasburg.

        Reply
    • DickHarden

      13 years ago

      That was official before the nats got Gio.

      Reply
      • Jay

        13 years ago

        Well now you can compete for the wildcard.I think this is a good trade for both teams.No more smack of the Nats from me

        Reply
    • KyleB

      13 years ago

      Nah, the Nats got better, but Gio is no ace. I’m not saying he can’t be one, but aces don’t have that ridiculous walk rate.

      Reply
  91. Sky14

    13 years ago

    Wow, talk about an overpay!

    Reply
    • johnnycomelately9

      13 years ago

      Norris sucks; Cole is overrated; Minlone might be total garbage in the majors.  The Nats won.  Stupid Beane gets praised but would have helped his team more by acquiring Rendon and Cole/Peacock.

      Reply
  92. Mark12

    13 years ago

    Nat’s will get Fielder now. Why sell the farm. If your not ready to win now. And who better than Fielder’s 40 plus homers to help your offense now that your pitching is good to go!!!

    Reply
    • DickHarden

      13 years ago

      Unless Fielder goes to NY, he isn’t hitting 40 bombs.

      Reply
      • not_brooks

        13 years ago

        Dude could hit 50 in Baltimore with that short porch in right. Especially since they’re lowering the wall a couple of feet.

        And, considering the fact that his top three homer seasons in Milwaukee were 38, 46 and 50, I’m pretty sure there are plenty of other parks where he could hit 40 fairly easily.

        Reply
        • DickHarden

          13 years ago

          He alternates between good and mediocre seasons. He’s due for a mediocre season next year, after that he’ll start his rapid decline.

          Reply
  93. Snoochies8

    13 years ago

    Robert Gilliam as a throw in? not bad, a little old for his level but put up good numbers

    Reply
    • not_brooks

      13 years ago

      23 is more than just “a little old” for A-ball.

      Reply
      • Lunchbox45

        13 years ago

        he’s probably the guy who has to buy all the other guys booze

        Reply
      • Snoochies8

        13 years ago

        just curious, what’s the normal age for a prospect to be at for A+ and AA?

        Reply
  94. Marky

    13 years ago

    oh great, he’s homophobic to boot.

    MLBTR mods….still waiting for you to drop the ban hammer on this troll. he’s really bringing down the quality here.

    Reply
  95. Jacob

    13 years ago

    Nicholas, my friend, the simple fact that you think your OPINION is EVIDENCE/FACTS paints a telling picture of your “analysis”. That you refute anyone who speaks to you, without utilizing any sort of intellectual honesty (ability to admit your OPINION is not FACT and that others’ OPINION’S are also based upon stats and scouting, much like you keep saying yours is) speaks volumes. You are, in essence, a troll. You may or may not realize this, but your actions make it so. Your over-redundant “copy-paste” jobs, your insistence that ONLY YOUR OPINION IS FACT, etc. You are clearly NOT here for an actual discussion or even debate on the topic, merely to cram your opinion down everone’s throat, parade it around as stone-cold FACT, and belittle every other opinion that isn’t yours. Pathetic. If you were TRULY up for debate/discussion, you’d have a more open mind. THAT is what being a “sheep” is about, friend. Wake up, participate honestly, or simply f&* off. Have a nice day.

    Reply
  96. Jacob

    13 years ago

    P.S. In the majority of philosophical circles, a contradiction in one’s argument provides evidence that one’s argument is false/wrong. You insist your opinion is fact, no other opinion though is fact. That is a contradiction. You, through your own words and without any assistance, contradicted yourself, defeating your own argument. Better luck next time, kid.

    Reply
  97. Lunchbox45

    13 years ago

    Ahhhhhhh.  I’m not going to lie, I’m relieved..

    but this is actually a really nice haul for the A’s .. Not as much star power as the Padres got, but more depth than the padres got.  4 B prospects is really nice, good haul for the A’s. 

    Reply
    • J.j. Miller

      13 years ago

      Cole and Peacock borderline B+

      Reply
      • Lunchbox45

        13 years ago

        Cole is a B+,  Peacock, Norris are B’s and Milone is a B-

        thats a legit B average, good haul

        Reply
  98. byebyeMathis

    13 years ago

    are the A’s mad??? Millone throws 85 with nothing but a changeup. Peacock is a 2-pitch pitcher with bad command. Norris can’t hit the broad side of a…..

    I kid I kid 🙂

    Reply
  99. J.j. Miller

    13 years ago

    Bailey next to go

    Id shop around a mccarthy + balfour deal, that coiuld result in 2-3 solid prospects

    Fuentez- he a left w/ experience, throw in some cash to find a taker.

    Suzuki- i doubt they sell low. But with donaldson, recker, norris there it catching depth

    Reply
    • Snoochies8

      13 years ago

      i could easily see balfour going before the start of spring training, and suzuki going during spring training if there were to be a major injury to a catcher. Suzuki is a really crappy hitter but with all his years under team control, i can see him bringing in a good haul

      Reply
  100. hisownfool

    13 years ago

    As a Nats’ STH, I have mixed feeling about the deal. IMO, it comes down to what you think about Peacock. Milone has a chance to become a nice back-of-the-rotation starter but there’s no room for him in DC. Norris is blocked by Ramos and the team has several catching prospects just below him. Both were expendable.

    Cole is a potential ace and was obviously the center piece of the trade. I hate to see him go. That leaves Peacock. Is he really a #2/3 starter or is he, as Keith Law and others think, a reliever? If it’s the former, then Rizzo probably paid too much. If you have your doubts then Rizzo “sold high” and avoided giving up someone like Destin Hood, never mind an Espinosa.

    I suspect that people in the Nationals’ front office were divided on Peacock.

    Reply
    • FacelessGeneralManager

      13 years ago

      Quality post!

      Giving up Cole hurts a lot! I mean he’s 19!!!!

      But Peacock sure looked like a 2/3 last year when i saw him. He was just nasty all year, minors and majors. The years before tho, not so good. Its a mixed bag, you never know.

      Reply
  101. obsessivegiantscompulsive

    13 years ago

    People are always talking about how constrained the A’s are financially, so maybe somebody can explain to me why the A’s are pulling down $20M in profits (EBITDA) on average over the past 5 seasons, based on Forbes research on MLB’s finances.  They could have easily afforded to sign a $10-15M player over the past 5 seasons but chose to bring the money down to the bottom line instead.  

    Reply
    • js_edit

      13 years ago

      Lew Wolfe is pleading poverty and deliberately tanking the team so MLB will let him move to San Jose. Anyone who says differently hasn’t been paying attention to Bay Area baseball.

      Reply
    • Guest 5653

      13 years ago

      The A’s *have* offered that much money to players before. In fact, just last year — after finally being free of Eric Chavez’s 6-year, $66M albatross — they offered Adrian Beltre 6-years, $76.8M. And they also offered Lance Berkman 2-years, $16M.

      The year prior to that, Adrian Beltre turned down the A’s guarantee of 3-years, $24M to play with Boston for 1-year, $10M (not that I blame him, but the fact remains that the A’s *did* make him a competitive offer). And Marco Scutaro — who was the best SS on the market — took $4M less than what the A’s guaranteed him, to also sign with Boston that winter. Missing out on those two players is why they went out and spent $10M on Ben Sheets. He was arguably the best free agent left on the market, and they knew they would have to overpay to make sure they got him.

      And the year prior to *that*, Rafael Furcal turned the A’s down for the Dodgers, even though LA’s guarantee was for $8M less than what the A’s offered him.

      These are just a *few* examples of Beane trying to spend what he can to improve the team in recent years. The fact that he’s limited to such a small budget, and that his team is stuck in an antiquated stadium that most players try to avoid is something he has no control over.

      And for the record, MLB makes certain that the A’s spend at least x-amount amount of dollars every year because they’re recipients of revenue sharing.

      At this point, there’s *no point* in the A’s trying to sign a bunch of players to long-term deals like they did with Eric Chavez, Kurt Suzuki, Brett Anderson, Trevor Cahill, et al, and like they tried their *best* to do with Jason Giambi, Rafael Furcal, Adrian Beltre, Marco Scutaro, Hisashi Iwakuma, et al. Because until they’re at least close to having a new ballpark — and having a better idea of what their budget will look like once they’re in it — there’s no way they can possibly come up with a clear strategy for building a team that will be strong contenders.

      The best thing they can do right now is what they *are* doing. And that’s rebuilding with an eye on 2014/2015, when they will *hopefully* have their new ballpark at least halfway through construction.

      Reply
  102. oaklandfan22

    13 years ago

    Who do you guys think got a better haul A’s for Gio or Padres for Latos

    Reply
    • KyleB

      13 years ago

      Padres…as they should have. Latos is the better pitcher.

      Reply
      • halofan06

        13 years ago

        not really…. gonzalez had better numbers last year in a better division and latos has one of the best divisions for hitter friendly parks.

        Reply
    • FamousGrouse

      13 years ago

      The Padres-Alonso is MLB ready, Grandal is a top prospect . 

      The Reds picks cost the Reds more to draft and develop (two first rounders). The prospects the A’s received were 4th round, 4th round, 41st round, and 10th round so it cost the Nationals system less to draft and develop these players. 

      Reply
  103. Daniel Han

    13 years ago

    Good Job Oakland

    Reply
  104. NatsTown

    13 years ago

    Gotta give up talent to get talent. Go NATS. and Congrats A’s on a great haul.

    Reply
  105. Wilsonl

    13 years ago

    I like this trade for the A’s.

    Reply
  106. Adam Moreira

    13 years ago

    A bit of a surprise that the Nationals made this move…I wonder if they really believe that Josh Outman has found his form again. I like this for the Nationals because Gio Gonzalez is still under team control for 4 more seasons (he’s a Super 2 this year).

    Reply
  107. Carter2Taylor2Cardenas2Weeks

    13 years ago

    Gio was my favorite Oakland A’…it’s such a sad day for me…Just wish we got more offense in the deal…too much pitching for a team in desperate need of offensive talent….Nats fans, you will love Gio…and yes, he is an ace.

    Reply
    • halofan06

      13 years ago

      not the ace when they will have strasburg coming back

      Reply
  108. Eric Mercado

    13 years ago

    is BJ Upton on the Nationals radar??? seems like that’s their next move, instead of going after Prince

    Reply
    • Guest 5597

      13 years ago

      I’m sure they’d love to make a run at him. But it seems pretty unlikely they could put together a good enough package for him now that this trade has happened.

      Reply
  109. DudasPriest

    13 years ago

    Nice Christmas present for A’s fans… Can’t believe what Washington gave up in this deal…

    Reply
  110. Cincyfan85

    4 years ago

    Good deal for the Nationals!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    Brewers Claim Drew Avans

    White Sox Sign Tyler Alexander, Place Jared Shuster On 15-Day IL

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version