Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Cubs’ Recent Losing Streak Changes Trade Deadline Outlook

By Anthony Franco | July 8, 2021 at 10:58pm CDT

A couple weeks ago, the Cubs had positioned themselves as likely buyers during trade season. As recently as June 24, Chicago was tied with the Brewers atop the NL Central, nine games over .500. The past two weeks have been an unmitigated disaster for the North Siders, though.

Between June 25 and July 7, the Cubs lost eleven consecutive games. They snapped that streak with a win over the Phillies last night, but Chicago enters tonight’s matchup against Philadelphia with an uninspiring 43-44 record. The Brewers, meanwhile, have rattled off a 10-3 stretch over that time, opening up an 8.5 game lead on Chicago within a 14-day span. (The 45-41 Reds have also since passed the Cubs to jump into second place in the division). Chicago isn’t a whole lot closer in the Wild Card race, trailing the Padres by seven games (with Cincinnati and the Nationals also above them in the standings).

An eleven game losing streak can certainly tank a team’s season, and it seems it might’ve in the Cubs’ case. On June 24, FanGraphs gave Chicago a 35.7% chance of making the playoffs; entering play today, their odds were down to 6.4%.

With a playoff berth all of a sudden seeming highly unlikely, the calculus for the Cubs front office changes considerably, a fact that president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer acknowledged this evening. Speaking with reporters (including Jordan Bastian of MLB.com, Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune and Gordon Wittenmyer of NBC Sports Chicago), Hoyer sounded far more willing to move players off the big league roster than he’d been a couple weeks ago.

“Eleven days ago, we were certainly fully on the buying side … and obviously (teams) are now calling to see which players are available,” Hoyer said. “So it’s a very different scenario than we’d expected. Life comes at you fast.” Asked whether the front office is willing to make players available, Hoyer noted their responsibility to consider anything “that can help build the next great Cubs team,” citing their aforementioned dwindling playoff odds.

The implications for the Cubs are obvious. Three of their highest-profile players — Kris Bryant, Javier Báez and Anthony Rizzo — are all slated to hit free agency at the end of the season. If the team isn’t contending in 2021, it stands to reason any or all of them could find themselves on the move over the next few weeks.

Certainly, there’d be plenty of interest in every member of that group. Bryant has bounced back from a disappointing 2020 to hit a very strong .269/.349/.498 with sixteen home runs over 324 plate appearances this year. He’s making far more consistent hard contact and barreling balls up at a rate he hasn’t since his MVP peak. Bryant’s production has tailed off after he got out to a scorching start to the year, but his combination of excellent season-long numbers and overall track record would make him perhaps the top player on the trade market were the Cubs to make him available.

Rizzo’s .250/.343/.439 line is down rather significantly from his best seasons. It’s still above-average offensive production, though, and he continues to offer a rare combination of bat-to-ball skills and hard contact (to say nothing of quality defensive marks at first base). Báez has struck out at an alarming 36.6% clip this year en route to a .234 batting average and a .282 on-base percentage. But he’s also popped 21 home runs and slugged .496, and he’s a comfortably above-average defender and baserunner.

Between their career accolades, key roles on the 2016 World Series team, and impending free agencies, that trio figures to draw the most fanfare in advance of the July 30 trade deadline. They’re far from the only players on whose availability other teams might inquire, though. Zach Davies, Joc Pederson and Jake Marisnick are useful players set to reach free agency this winter. (Marisnick has a mutual option for 2022, but mutual options are rarely exercised by both parties).

Willson Contreras, controllable via arbitration through 2022, is one of the game’s best catchers and was the subject of trade discussion last offseason. Closer Craig Kimbrel is having an incredible bounceback campaign, pitching to a 0.57 ERA with a 46.2% strikeout rate and 8.5% walk percentage after struggling mightily between 2019-20. Kimbrel’s $16MM salary for 2021 now looks more than reasonable, as does the matching option on his contract for 2022.

Certainly, it’d be a surprise to see all of those players change teams in the next few weeks. Hoyer pushed back against the idea the Cubs were planning to kick off any sort of full-on rebuild, even as he acknowledged that the 2022 roster will look different from the current iteration. He also noted there’s still some possibility — slim as it now seems — the team plays its way back into contention over the coming weeks.

The Cubs have eighteen more games before the deadline. After facing the Phils tonight, their slate through July 29 consists of seven games against the Cardinals, six against the lowly Diamondbacks, and four against the Reds, one of the teams they’ll need to leapfrog for a postseason spot.

Winning thirteen or fourteen of those contests might get the Cubs sufficiently close to the postseason picture that the front office decides not to orchestrate a sell-off. The core of the current club has been pivotal to arguably the franchise’s most successful five-year run in over a century. It certainly wouldn’t be a surprise to see Hoyer and his front office give the group as long a leash as possible this summer to try to play their way back into the mix.

Nevertheless, the most likely scenario is that the club’s dreadful past two weeks dug them a hole too deep to come back from. That’s an inescapable reality Hoyer acknowledged this afternoon, one that may result in a few of the franchise’s most important players of recent memory donning new uniforms in a few weeks’ time.

Share 0 Retweet 9 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Anthony Rizzo Craig Kimbrel Jake Marisnick Javier Baez Joc Pederson Kris Bryant Willson Contreras Zach Davies

Minor MLB Transactions: 7/8/21
Main
Indians Release Rene Rivera
View Comments (355)
Post a Comment

355 Comments

  1. Noel1982

    4 years ago

    Kris Bryant and Craig Kimbrell for Marco Luciano and a guy who may or may not ever make the majors like will Wilson seems like. Good deal

    Kyle Hendricks for Josiah gray seems like a good deal

    Javier baez to the Yankees for gleber back and Luis gil seems like a good deal

    Keep rizzo I guess

    3
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      I don’t see any of those happening. I will guarantee the baez for gleber won’t.

      26
      Reply
      • ABCD

        4 years ago

        Neither will the others.

        11
        Reply
        • oldmansteve

          4 years ago

          This sounds like the ramblings of a 14 year old submitting trade proposals on MLB The Show.

          46
          Reply
        • ChiSox_Fan

          4 years ago

          Such low hanging fruit… I won’t bother.

          Dogboner is muted. No fun anymore reading his cr$p.

          Cubs suck. That’s all I know.

          7
          Reply
        • FunkyButtLovin

          4 years ago

          You’ve been awfully quiet the last 14 years…might as well get all your Cub hate out while you can.

          4
          Reply
        • scurvyrickets

          4 years ago

          Yet here you are again…always on the Cubs forums…kinda creepy. But hey, we can’t all have a failing Sox blog

          5
          Reply
        • johnk

          4 years ago

          Fan trades are never made

          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          Trades on that game aee ridiculously stupid. I traded Trevor Williams and Alec Mills for Jacob deGrom. Then Ian Happ for Hunter Greene. That was in franchise.

          1
          Reply
        • Free Palestine

          4 years ago

          I like people who make trade proposals more than negative responses.
          Some of want to talk baseball without the insults.
          You’re not funny and witty for putting strangers down on the internet.

          15
          Reply
        • thecoffinnail

          4 years ago

          I saw one the other day that suggested the Yankees trade Judge to LA for Bellinger. Not sure why he stopped there. I’m sure the Cardinals would swap Flaherty for Severino and Cleveland would happily send Karinchak for Britton. Maybe the Yankees should switch Andujar back to 3rd and include him with Britton to get the Indians to send over Ramirez. That seems fair, right? To be honest I think Torres for Story is the kind of trade most teams would accept. Rental position players don’t bring back the strong return they did a decade ago. Torres needs a fresh start elsewhere and Story won’t resign in Colorado. Rodgers is ready to take over SS and Torres is a far better at 2nd. It won’t happen because the Yankees won’t be spending money on FA position players for at least 5 years. Trading for Story makes no sense for them. They need Torres for another year until Peraza is ready and then they will probably trade him for a struggling pitcher like Tallison. High ceiling struggling type like Chris Paddack. Won’t be Paddack because the Padres don’t need Torres just similar to him. The Yankees should be targeting the Padres as a trade partner this deadline. They have the bullpen pieces and will eat payroll exactly what San Diego needs. If Britton can get healthy or Chapman figures it out they could package one of them with Green and possible get Abrams back. He is definitely blocked at all positions in San Diego and will free up the Yankees to trade Torres this year. Too bad Kluber wasn’t healthy. Kluber, Green and Britton + $15m for Paddack, Abrams and Espinoza/McWilliams (frees up a 40 man spot) would be a win for both teams.

          2
          Reply
        • lemonlyman

          4 years ago

          Lol @ making fun of ppl’s trades then suggesting the only thing that would prevent a Kluber + Green + Britton + cash for Paddack, Abrams, and Espinosa/McWilliams is Kluber’s health. Yeah, really separated yourself from the wacky pack with that proposal.

          7
          Reply
        • rondon

          4 years ago

          Chi sox.. But you continue to bother…

          1
          Reply
        • sportingdissent

          4 years ago

          I’d prefer people not comment rather than make pipe-dream proposals that have no basis in reality. To each their own I guess.

          2
          Reply
        • SonnySteele

          4 years ago

          I prefer that people don’t suggest that others shouldn’t comment. 😉

          3
          Reply
        • JohnJasoJingleHeimerSchmidt

          4 years ago

          Chi Sox has little brother syndrome.

          3
          Reply
        • Hudson6

          4 years ago

          So the Yankees get the #8 prospect in all of baseball and a quality starting pitcher, which San Diego cannot afford to lose right now, who is under cheap control for several years. This in exchange for your garbage?

          Sounds fair.

          Reply
        • Hudson6

          4 years ago

          @ thecoffinnail

          Crack is a hell of a drug.

          Reply
    • HiPeople

      4 years ago

      Hendricks for Gray is the only one of these that makes even a little bit of sense

      5
      Reply
    • holecamels35

      4 years ago

      Yanks shouldn’t be taking on rentals at this point. How many more SP do the Dodgers need?

      I’d like to see Kimbrel to Toronto or Boston. Bryant to Mets or Rays as pure rental. Maybe Hendricks to the Angels.

      I think they try to keep one or both of Baez and Rizzo, if not send Baez to the A’s.

      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        @hole 1-3 depending on what happens the next few weeks.

        1
        Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        4 years ago

        “How many more SP do the Dodgers need?”

        Read the news.
        1.) #5 SP Dustin May is out for the year.
        2.) #3 SP Bauer is gone from baseball for the year, if not forever.
        3.) #1b SP Kershaw has an injury that may or may not be serious.
        This leaves #1a Buehler and #4 Urias. Let’s assume that Kershaw is back in 2-3 weeks. The Dodgers still need one more SP.

        If Dodgers were willing to spend over the limit (would baseball give them a credit for Bauer?), they could trade prospects Keibert Ruiz, Kody Hose and Diego Cartaya to the Cubs for Kimbrel and Hendricks. Maybe the Cubs take Price in the deal to get three great prospects.

        3
        Reply
        • Free Palestine

          4 years ago

          They might give up 1 catching prospect but the dodgers wouldn’t trade both in the same trade.

          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          No one wants David Price. That’s a hard pass for me. I wouldn’t trade Hendricks at all. He’s the cubs most consistent pitcher. I don’t think Baez,Rizzo or Contreras get traded. Kris Bryant and Kimbrel are like 80% chances. A complete mid season fire isn’t needs. I don’t take anyone on Twitter calling themselves a cubs fan. Some of them want everyone gone. KB,Baez,Rizzo,Hendricks,Kimbtel and Chafin.

          It’s not likely but even with being 9 games back. It’s not completely out of reach the cubs can win the NL Central.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins why would Baez and Rizzo not get traded? If the Cubs trade anyone at all they basically have to trade both those guys.

          1
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          They need to keep at least one of the three. I love baez but he’s very frustrating to watch sometimes. I’d keep rizzo over baez. Baez won’t get more than 180mil this winter. If he’s traded They should try to re-sign him at most 6 years. Ed Howard will be the everyday SS by then. Baez is the type of guy that would change positions to help the team. And honestly the cubs will probably get low balled with Bawz trade offers.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins Why do they need to keep at least one of the three? What exactly is it that you think will happen if they don’t keep at least one of them? They’ll lose 86 games instead of 84? Who cares!?

          2
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          It doesn’t matter what will happen. Trading all 3 only hurts them more. At this point the winner of the NL Central will be maybe 5 games over .500

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins How does trading all 3 as opposed to keeping 1 player hurt them more? ‘Splain it.

          3
          Reply
        • Voice of Reason

          4 years ago

          Hendricks will be a free agent in 3 years and 34 years old. Trade him right now or this offseason for maximum return. The Cubs might start competing again in 3 years.

          4
          Reply
        • PitcherMeRolling

          4 years ago

          Ruiz, Hoese and Cartaya for Hendricks and Kimbrel is as bad as any of the trades the OP suggested. This isn’t the 90s when teams would part with loads of top talent for a rental. MAYBE the Cubs get one of the three since Hendricks has affordable years left on his contract, but the Dodgers could get so much more for those 3.

          1
          Reply
        • PitcherMeRolling

          4 years ago

          The Brewers are already 17 games over .500, so no. Also, it doesn’t matter if the division winner is only 5 games over .500 if the Cubs are 10 games back. They can get 4th with those guys and they can get 4th without those guys and get some prospects to help down the road. One of those makes sense, the other doesn’t.

          2
          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          I think thats the exact kind of trade the Cubs will be looking to make, and I’d bet they’d be happy to take on a David Price (pending what he’s still owed and what is kicked in from LAD- I’ve lost track of his contract) player to throw some innings and maximize their return. Well thought out, IMO

          2
          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          What is the point of keeping Hendricks when you lose Kimbrel, Baez, Bryant and/or Rizzo, possibly others like Contreras, Peterson. It’s time to tear it down, Theo botched it in the end. It happens. He won a championship.

          2
          Reply
        • frankf

          4 years ago

          I can get behind this. If what we gave up for Aroldis and later Quintana is any indication, Kimbrel (= w/ Aroldis) and Hendricks (>Q) could be the keys to an instant top 10.

          Of course we’d need to find an equally willing partner.

          Reply
        • revolver

          4 years ago

          Baez ain’t getting 180 mill. Lol.

          2
          Reply
        • revolver

          4 years ago

          Neither are rentals.

          Reply
        • PitcherMeRolling

          4 years ago

          The Cubs aren’t getting anything close to Gleyber for Kimbrel.

          Reply
        • Dogbone

          4 years ago

          @revolver. Your absolutely right, Baez likely will not get HALF of that. He’s gonna get a big dose of reality. I predict he will either sign a ‘make good, one year contract’, or a very team friendly deal.

          Reply
        • cubbiepatriot21

          4 years ago

          Putting the losses on the big three and not trying to keep and resign at least Bryant and build around him is moronic. Cubs shouldn’t be in rebuild mode but repair mode. They aren’t far away from contending, as seen by leading the division in May and early June. They still have talent on this team and need 1) SP and 2) one consistent above average hitter.

          Happ, Heyward, Pederson—sell them. Give money for Heyward.

          Do not sell stars like a small market team with no hope for the next year. It’s ludicrous and shortsighted.

          Reply
        • BeeVeeTee

          4 years ago

          Cubbiepatriot21, please lay off whatever drugs you are doing to think any team is willing to take on Heyward and his contract! I get it! You are a fan but that’s wishful thinking and the Cubs would have to take on big chunk of that contract if they want to move Heyward.

          Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        holecamels35
        I’d like to see Kimbrel to Toronto or Boston.
        ================================================
        What role would Kimbrel play on the RS? No doubt that Kimbrel is really good, but if the RS have the 8th/9th in pretty good shape right now. And if they are going to trade any prospects, they have other competing needs.

        Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Why keep Rizzo?

      2
      Reply
      • ABCD

        4 years ago

        It’s possible Rizzo would accept a QO and hope he has a better season next year.

        2
        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Rizzo is not accepting the QO.

          Reply
        • dugdog83

          4 years ago

          Rizzo is getting paid son

          Reply
        • ABCD

          4 years ago

          It depends on how Rizzo finishes the season, gramps.

          3
          Reply
        • Franco27

          4 years ago

          Based on? He’s having a very mediocre year, after a bad year. Back issues.

          3
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Rizzo has about as high of a chance of accepting a QO as I do of ever receiving one.

          1
          Reply
        • BobGibsonFan

          4 years ago

          Your grandpa is calling you son? Are you guys from West Virginia?

          7
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          The QO what he wants AAV so there’s no reason for him to decline. It’s unfortunate the cubs low balled him.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          LOL

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins he could get a better AAV than the QO on a one year deal easy

          Reply
        • Voice of Reason

          4 years ago

          Define “getting paid”. At his age with that back issue he ain’t getting no $100 million deal.

          1
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          He’s gonna be 32 and looks to be in decline (which makes sense given the age). Anyone who gives him a fat contract, as you imply is inevitable, is stupid and will regret it. Great career but he’s in his thirties, how many truly great years, if any, does he have left in the tank? Someone is just gonna pay him for what he’s already done and then be shocked and disappointed by the normal aging process, typical career arc.

          Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        4 years ago

        Because he will be cheaper than Bryant, Baez and Kimbrel and you might want to keep two to make the fans happy. The Cubs offered 5 years and $70 million. I think that a fair deal would be four years and $72 million. If were the Cubs, I would try to win maybe 9 out of the next 13 games, if they can’t do it, trade Kimbrel, Bryant and Pederson. Try to resign Rizzo (but don’t go too high) and Baez. Hendricks and Contreras are signed through 2022 so it would take a lot to move them, but any could be had for the right price.

        1
        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @MannyBeingMVP…

          “Because he will be cheaper than Bryant, Baez and Kimbrel…”

          That isn’t a reason to keep him. It’s a reason against keeping him. It means he’ll be the easiest to sign of the three so they have less to lose in trading him.

          “…and you might want to keep two to make the fans happy.”

          Are you seriously saying that making fans feel all warm and fuzzy is more important to you than maximizing value from your assets? If so, then boy are Cubs fans glad you’re not the GM lol.

          “Try to resign Rizzo (but don’t go too high) and Baez.”

          Again, they can still do that if they trade them. They did it with Jason Hammel.

          1
          Reply
        • PitcherMeRolling

          4 years ago

          “If I were the Cubs I’d try to win 9 out of 13 games”.

          Yeah, every team in the league would like to win 9 of 13.

          Reply
        • CalcetinesBlancos

          4 years ago

          “Are you seriously saying that making fans feel all warm and fuzzy is more important to you than maximizing value from your assets?”

          Is this like your first interaction with a Cubs fan or something? They willingly go to a ballpark that smells like urine and still worship an incoherent drunk announcer who’s been gone more than two decades lol.

          1
          Reply
        • Cosmo2

          4 years ago

          Isn’t “making the fans feel all warm and fuzzy” (ie happy) supposed to be one of the goals? A main goal? Sell tickets. Entertain.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          No, the goal is to maximize the long-term utility from their assets.

          Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        They’d be dumb to trade everyone. Why deplete the a majority of the ML roster.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          What would be so dumb about it Billy? And as far as depleting a majority of the ML roster, they are about to lose those guys anyway. Might as well get something for them while they can.

          3
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          It’s dumb because as bad as they’ve been they still have a chance to win the very weak nl central. They probably won’t. Technically kinbtrl has an option for 2022. Not sure if it’s player/club or mutual. Bryant is the only real chance of leaving. I just don’t see why they’d trade all of them. They can’t hat roll over and die. Would you want your team to trade more than a 3rd of the everyday lineup? Highly doubt it.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins the Cubs aren’t winning anything this year. And if they really did have a chance this article wouldn’t exist because trading core players simply wouldn’t be an option for them.

          Kimbrel’s option is a club option.

          I would absolutely want my team to trade more than a 3rd of the everyday lineup if everyone they traded was about to leave anyway and I wasn’t going to win even with those players.

          2
          Reply
        • PitcherMeRolling

          4 years ago

          The Cubs are 9.5 back. If the NL Central is weak, it’s partially because the Cubs aren’t very good.

          1
          Reply
    • MikeD26

      4 years ago

      You have to be a cubs fan, is not Luciano the #1 prospect in SF?

      4
      Reply
      • Central Valley

        4 years ago

        Yes, he’d be untouchable in my opinion

        5
        Reply
      • johnk

        4 years ago

        Good name for Chicago

        1
        Reply
    • Central Valley

      4 years ago

      Just heard the guys on MLB network that are covering the Reds Brewers game say that the Giants should consider being sellers. They believe that Zaidi isn’t going to go all in for this year, but next year. Load up on prospects.

      Flip Gausman, Wood, Desclafani, etc for prospects.

      1
      Reply
      • PitcherMeRolling

        4 years ago

        No one on MLB Network knows what they’re talking about and this is a perfect example.

        16
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          4 years ago

          The guys on MLB Network are often right and often wrong, I like the channel. But if they said the Giants will sell, I agree that they are completely wrong on that one. i think the Giants will be a wild card and they will not be big buyers but certainly not sellers. They may pick up a big rental if there is something useful. With Gausman and DeSclafani both being free agents after the season, now is the time for the Giants to make a run, it will be tougher for them to play with the Dodgers and Padres next year.

          1
          Reply
        • hopper15

          4 years ago

          MLB Network must want Zaidi to be the most hated man in San Francisco. Could you imagine telling Crawford and Posey in the clubhouse we’re selling after what they’ve done this season.

          Reply
      • Dunk Dunkington

        4 years ago

        Always smart to sell being 20 games above .500 and still in first. While the Giants are falling back a bit, they are just likely a WC at worst case

        4
        Reply
    • ryrockak

      4 years ago

      Luciano isn’t going anywhere imo

      5
      Reply
      • hopper15

        4 years ago

        Certainly not for rentals.

        1
        Reply
    • PitcherMeRolling

      4 years ago

      @Noel those trades are all terrible

      2
      Reply
    • PutPeteinthehall

      4 years ago

      Rizzo going to Red Sox. No one wants to give much of anything for Baez. Seeing him end up taking a QO in the off-season would not surprise me. I’d say Kimbrel, Davies, Bryant, maybe even Pederson and or Marisnick are gone. Hendricks has long term deal and isn’t getting moved. Kinda doubt Contreras is moved too. He’s got another year left. I believe the QO was around 18.6 million last season. Baez is a gamble. I see him being forced to take it if he continues to get on base at such a low rate.

      1
      Reply
      • BobGibsonFan

        4 years ago

        Happ is having a bad year, but I bet he could get a decent return. He’s had 4 good years.

        Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          I think he has 3 years of control.

          Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Red Sox have nothing of value. I’d rather keep Rizzo and then extend him after the WS

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          I doubt the RS would want him. Rizzo and Dalbec have pretty similar stats since the start of May. I think they want to give Dalbec as much of a chance as possible. If they found a huge upgrade, maybe, but I don’t think Rizzo would be that much of an upgrade (maybe 50-100 OPS points).

          If fact, I am not sure they are trading for anyone at the deadline, unless a #1 SP falls into their laps. Or maybe a cheap, lower-end RP.

          Reply
    • Franco27

      4 years ago

      No

      Reply
    • Adios pelota!

      4 years ago

      I agree with your idea of Giants going after Bryant (I actually think he’ll be their main target in FA with little money on the books). But, Giants won’t give up Luciano. Heilot Ramos maybe with Will Wilson maaaybe but still unlikely. For a rental, the price won’t be as high as you expect.

      Reply
      • Gmen777

        4 years ago

        If they throw Kimbrel in also if at least entertain the idea of trading anyone except Luciano

        1
        Reply
    • thecoffinnail

      4 years ago

      They Yankees won’t trade Torres for a rental. The Yankees have too many anchor contracts (Cole, Chapman, Stanton, Hicks) to prevent them from signing someone like Baez in the offseason. Gio and Voit are gonna get expensive with arb raises. Sanchez will probably have one of the best offensive years for a catcher in his walk year and he’ll get yet another anchor contract. Severino will come back healthy next year and they will exercise his option. Setting him up for a big payday. No, the Yankees will be sellers this year. Expect Britton (if healthy), Kluber (if healthy), Green, and anyone else a team will give a decent return for to be on the block. Cashman knows (if healthy) this team will compete next year and he can cash in expendable players this year. The Yankees need decent prospects to help them compete in a few years when 6-7 players will be chewing up $150m a year. They screwed their future bringing in Cole and Stanton and they got lucky with Gio and Voit. It will be a couple of years before Dominguez is ready to hold down a spot so they need Frazier or Andujar until then. Torres will probably get shopped in the off-season if Peraza finishes strong. He is their hope for SS in the future. Their pitching prospects might help (doubtful they usually are busts) but more than likely they will be throwing money at the rotation for the next 3-5 years. No way they bring in any expensive position players. Sorry about the novel. Just tired of reading scenarios for the Yankees that are just wishful thinking.

      1
      Reply
      • stymeedone

        4 years ago

        If smart, the Yankees will let someone else sign Sanchez, and they will go out and get an actual catcher.

        4
        Reply
    • driftcat28 2

      4 years ago

      Regardless of Torres’ struggles the Cubs would not get him back for Baez

      Reply
    • B-Roni 27

      4 years ago

      I have a hard time thinking the Giants would give up Marco Luciano but I will say that Kris Bryant just seems like a San Fran Giants type player. Same with Kimbrel. Jed Hooyer would do that trade in a heartbeat. Yeah, it may be far fetched but there is still a lot of baseball left and Giants have to need help to stay ahead of LAD and Padres.

      1
      Reply
    • Ghost of past pirates

      4 years ago

      this guy is baldyphoenixtroll

      Reply
    • iverbure

      4 years ago

      If you haven’t noticed teams don’t usually trade their top 5 prospects anymore. Generally if they get a star player it’s a guy ranked 6-8 with a couple other guy’s thrown in and you people here say that’s it. They got fleeced! Even though these are the standard trades now.

      Reply
    • Catuli Carl

      4 years ago

      Silliness

      1
      Reply
  2. cubs2016

    4 years ago

    It’ll be a reload rather than a rebuild. But I digress. Cue the select few crosstown trolls and dumpster divin whoever to trash this comment section.

    3
    Reply
    • mike127

      4 years ago

      2016—-just hit the mute button…..it really makes the comment section an easy read. Keep all those with intelligent opinions whether you agree or not and forever say so long to any obvious troll.

      5
      Reply
      • cubs2016

        4 years ago

        App on IOS doesn’t have the mute button yet, otherwise it would’ve been done the minute it came out.

        Reply
        • ChiSox_Fan

          4 years ago

          Try Safari on IOS.
          I see a mute button.
          You are gone now!

          Reply
        • rondon

          4 years ago

          So are you, little brother!

          1
          Reply
  3. YourDreamGM

    4 years ago

    I would trade anyone I could. I wouldn’t sign anyone back this winter unless the price was right. Build to a contender again with young cost controlled talent.

    3
    Reply
    • dugdog83

      4 years ago

      The big 3 is the Cubs only talent

      1
      Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        Not true.

        1
        Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        That’s completely false. They have the best catcher in baseball to start. Nico Hoerner is gonna be a superstar. Hendricks when he’s on is very good. I think it was last year. Hendricks has a CG shutout vs the cards with 81 pitches.

        Joc Pederson isn’t a superstar but he’s a decent player.

        Adbert Alzolay is very good too. The long ball has hurt him but he’s the future ace. Keegan Thompson is a future mainstay in the rotation as well as Justin Steele.

        Reply
        • oldmansteve

          4 years ago

          When did the Cubs sign Realmuto?

          Edit: Never mind. Got to the Alzolay is a future Ace part and realized you were delusional. Carry on.

          2
          Reply
        • frankf

          4 years ago

          Alzolay is a future back end rotation staple, mid-rotation if we’re lucky, but certainly not the A word.

          1
          Reply
  4. Whifff

    4 years ago

    The Cubs are running a clinic on how to let it fall into an abyss. I hate that someone will turn this next comment into a “Sox-Cubs thing” but Rick Hahn for example, would have turned this roster into a restocked and LOADED minor league system by now.

    6
    Reply
    • Android Dawesome

      4 years ago

      Hasnt Hahn been GM for 10 years now? And he still hasnt won anything.

      8
      Reply
      • Whifff

        4 years ago

        Reading is a skill Android. I didn’t say anything about championships. I spoke of restocking the system. I wish more would read……before commenting. Hahn had a top 5 system a year ago. That was the point.

        8
        Reply
        • mike127

          4 years ago

          But Whiff, in the same vain….Bryant, Contreras, Rizzo, Hendricks, Baez et al were that LOADED minor league system that won a championship and have been a contender for the past six plus seasons. It’s easy for a Cub fan to say these two teams were even eight years ago and they loaded the minors and became good while the Sox scuffled for six more seasons. Perhaps (probably easy to say now) the Cubs could have gotten “more” if they moved these guys sooner but we don’t know that now.

          Let’s be honest——-going back 100 years these teams have combined for two…..two championships.

          6
          Reply
        • dugdog83

          4 years ago

          Point of the night

          4
          Reply
        • Whifff

          4 years ago

          No Mike. Tanking and drafting high is one way to build the farm and yes, the Cubs did that well. My point, knowing when to break up the major league club and trade the established players to rebuild the farm, is something the Cubs are failing, and failing miserable to do.

          6
          Reply
        • mike127

          4 years ago

          Tanking did NOT help the Cubs—and as a matter of fact while the Cubs were “tanking” the White Sox were selecting ahead of the Cubs in at least half of those years.

          Kris Bryant is the only player picked high that really panned out as they thought he would—-Almora–not good, Bryant–MVP caliber, Schwarber–streaky and only now having “that” run…Happ…nope. They did NOT draft well towards the top of round one.

          And while they were “tanking” it is a fact that after year one the Cubs record got BETTER everyone season from 2012 leading up to the World Series. If they were tanking the record would have gotten worse. So stop with the tanking stuff—that’s the biggest fallacy of all attached to the Cubs during their build.

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @mike127 tanking was glorious for the Cubs.

          Reply
        • ABCD

          4 years ago

          Mike is correct. Four killer trades – Rizzo, Arrieta, Hendricks, Russell. Excellent free agent pickups – Lester, Zobrist, Fowler.

          3
          Reply
        • Sliderdownandin

          4 years ago

          You are correct in noting the Sox scuffled far too long. They should have begun their rebuild 2-3 years sooner than they did. While I do not necessarily blame Hahn for the Tatis trade, as nobody knew Tatis was going to amount to anything, but it was an error in judgement in trying to buy at the deadline in 2016 that cost the Sox Tatis.

          Had they been sellers, it would have never happened. As the saying goes, “know when to hold em, know when to fold em”.

          1
          Reply
        • Adolpho67

          4 years ago

          Re “Tanking”…don’t you have to be a decent to good team before you can be accused of tanking? Cubs weren’t good for many years before Theo or for 2.5 years after he arrived.

          1
          Reply
        • knuck2

          4 years ago

          Was there a reason to be sellers when you’re 2 games out of 1st place in the first week of June?

          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          They traded for fowler when they first got him. From the Astros for Luis Valbuena(RIP) and I think one other player. They did seek up behind Baltimore in 2016 and sign him as a Free agent.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          If you were doing it Hahns way, you would have signed Rizzo, Bryant, Baez and Hendricks to affordable long term contracts and then traded them away, resulting in a missed opportunity for a World Series win, and just now be coming out of your rebuild.

          2
          Reply
      • Dogbone

        4 years ago

        I believe our White Sox are going on 10 years without winning 80 games. And still counting.

        4
        Reply
        • BobGibsonFan

          4 years ago

          But they had some really good prospects. And they signed a hall of fame drunk… I mean manager.

          2
          Reply
        • Curly Was The Smart Stooge

          4 years ago

          That hall of fame “drunk” has CW in 1st by 7.5 games.

          Reply
        • Cmurphy

          4 years ago

          WS are in first place despite the manager. They’d be further ahead if they didn’t have him.

          2
          Reply
      • ChiSox_Fan

        4 years ago

        No, Hahn has not. Maybe 3-5.

        Kenny W. preceded him.

        Reply
  5. A'sfaninUK

    4 years ago

    Kimbrel told the Cubs he’s picking between Oakland and Houston this week. No idea what the return would be from either. If he picks the A’s we all know why he went with them over the Astros.

    1
    Reply
    • Lloyd Emerson

      4 years ago

      Cite your sources.

      4
      Reply
      • A'sfaninUK

        4 years ago

        look at the name of this site

        2
        Reply
        • oldmansteve

          4 years ago

          I heard Kimbrel was thinking of a 2024 Presidential run.

          11
          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          4 years ago

          He’s not old enough – debunked.

          1
          Reply
        • oldmansteve

          4 years ago

          He’ll be 36 by then. Stay in your own country, redcoat.

          23
          Reply
        • ChiSox_Fan

          4 years ago

          Trump is the leading Republican candidate.

          Reply
        • ChapmansVacuum

          4 years ago

          35 for senate 45 for pres.

          Reply
        • BobGibsonFan

          4 years ago

          This site lets us say “Trump” now?

          2
          Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          i should.hope we. can objectively say the name of a former president

          1
          Reply
        • Ducky Buckin Fent

          4 years ago

          Or discuss Bridge.

          “three no trump”.

          2
          Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          4 years ago

          Trump already submitted his resume to Haiti.

          3
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          He was hardly the head of state. He should be in prison for everyone he killed due to covid. I’m not going further into it. Not the time or place for BS politics

          3
          Reply
        • hyraxwithaflamethrower

          4 years ago

          @ChapmansVacuum. No, it’s 25 for House of Representatives, 30 for Senate, 35 for President.

          1
          Reply
        • hyraxwithaflamethrower

          4 years ago

          @DarkSide830, how many people, regardless of political affiliation, use his name without a heavy bias? I think we should be allowed to use the name wherever, but know that it almost always stirs the pot.

          Reply
        • frankf

          4 years ago

          Bout time we had a qualified candidate.

          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          Saying Trump objectively is an oxymoron.

          Reply
        • Catuli Carl

          4 years ago

          Hahahaha wtf? I’m so curious to know what you think the death toll would have been under a president Hillary Clinton or a President Biden and what they would have done differently. You’re delusional and naive.

          Reply
        • fabulous61

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins, nobody even knows what the actual death toll is. The CDC admitted that they were counting any death where the deceased tested positive as Covid deaths. The 17 year old kid in Virginia that took a bullet between the eyes counted as a Covid death as well as who knows how many that were already only given a week or two to live due to cancer. If you believe any of what the CDC, Fox or CNN reported regarding Covid you’re clearly delusional. In case you didn’t know it Obama funded the lab in China that Covid came out of so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          These are people that lack a broad knowledge base. The US has a similar death rate to the UK, France, Spain, Italy, etc. And since Covid has a lot to do with population density, there is no good way to even compare the different countries.

          I don’t think some of the posters know the first thing about Covid.

          Reply
    • tim815

      4 years ago

      I didn’t know Kimbrel was responsible for trading himself.

      9
      Reply
      • A'sfaninUK

        4 years ago

        connect the dots yourself im not doing all the lifting for you

        Reply
        • hiflew

          4 years ago

          You are not doing any of the lifting, you are just throwing out random statements and then telling people to play scavenger hunt in order to waste their time. Pretty good try and you probably got some people to fall for it, but let it go.

          10
          Reply
        • A'sfaninUK

          4 years ago

          Ok so did I really need to write “Cubs told Kimbrel to pick between Oakland and Houston and Kimbrel told the Cubs he’s picking between Oakland and Houston this week.” christ you are asinine.

          Reply
        • hiflew

          4 years ago

          No you didn’t need to say that, but you did need to say where you found that info. Otherwise you are just some guy making stuff up. You have no credibility.

          7
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          There’s literally nothing on this site stating such a thing.

          Reply
    • Tom Emansk1

      4 years ago

      Kimbrel is going to whoever gives up the best package, whether that’s the As, the Doosan Bears, or the Guadalajara Mariachis

      8
      Reply
      • A'sfaninUK

        4 years ago

        Except its only the A’s or Astros, no other team will acquire him.

        Reply
        • oldmansteve

          4 years ago

          Can I get a source for this rumor?

          8
          Reply
        • Ducky Buckin Fent

          4 years ago

          The Queen of England.

          12
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Why only those two teams? Does no one else need a closer, or will the Cubs only deal with those two teams?

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          Where is this? I literally scrolled through Craig Kimbrel trade rumors on this site dating back to 2018 and literally nothing came up about him and the Astros or A’s.

          Reply
        • Ducky Buckin Fent

          4 years ago

          It’s scuttlebutt from the Royal court.

          Reply
  6. dave frost nhlpa

    4 years ago

    Rizzo,Baez,Kimbrell for Voit and Garcia

    1
    Reply
    • Bjoe

      4 years ago

      The Cubs would laugh and hang up

      8
      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      4 years ago

      The Yankees would need to trade Clarke Schmidt, Austin Wells and Esevan Florial to get Craig Kimbrel and Javier Baez. And the Yankees probably would not want Rizzo.

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Rizzo wouks be an upgrade at 1st for them. Baez can play all 4 infield spots and play them like they’re his natural postions. It’s too bad kinbrel doesn’t have at least a limited no trade clause. I’d refuse to go to the Yankees. Just so I won’t be forced to shave my beard. Which honestly they need to drop the rule. George Steinbrenner past away 11 years ago. I think they can move on now.

        Reply
    • Catuli Carl

      4 years ago

      Wishful drinking

      Reply
  7. BeeVeeTee

    4 years ago

    The Cubs lack quality pitching on its MLB roster along with a weak farm system to even consider buying at the deadline. Theo “The Baseball Genius” Epstein did not tool the Cubs’ farm system during his tenure and traded away their best assets. Thats one of the biggest reasons why he left during this past offseason while fans won’t shift the blame on him and they focus on the Ricketts. It’s going to be a long three to four years for the Cubs organization if they don’t make the correct moves in the next few weeks.

    7
    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      Actually, Fangraphs would contradict about the minor league system being weak. It has very good depth which is good for trading if you’re buying which barring a large wiñning streak, they won’t. The top prospect, Brennen Davis, is not top tier yet, though.

      4
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Davis will be a mainstay on the cubs sooner rather than later. Especially if they trade Joc.

        Reply
      • BeeVeeTee

        4 years ago

        When Theo was in charge of the Cubs he focused on tooling the MLB roster with putting all of the money into it rather than putting some resources into the minor league system. The pitchers Theo drafted did not pan out too well in the minor league system. Theo trading away both Cease and Jimenez for Quintana was a terrible move by him but a steal for the White Sox, which us White Sox’s fans did not understand how Quintana was even worth the Cubs’ top two prospects who were ranked in the top 100.

        Reply
      • BeeVeeTee

        4 years ago

        Trade Fiasco, the Cubs’ top ten prospects are in AA ball and lower. Those players are two to three years away that all depends on their development in their respective leagues and to staying healthy. That’s the same with majority of the Cubs’s prospects from 11 to 30. There is not one prospect who is MLB ready in the Cubs’ farm system, which is why I previously mentioned on their development and health.

        There are some players in AAA expected to come up this season while some players are players are expected in AA to come next year or the year after that, however, again that all depends on their development and health. Cubs’ fans should want the Cubs’ developing these guys rather than trading them away for one last party with Baez, Bryant, Contreras, Hendricks and Rizzo. These guys should be moved to make that system stronger and the organization to start rebuilding for a 2025/2026 push. If the Cubs do make one last push and trade away some assets they have in their system that window four the future 2025/2026 goes to 2028/2029. The future of the Cubs is this next few weeks with the draft and trade deadline.

        1
        Reply
    • Cubs Dynasty

      4 years ago

      BeeVeeTee – excellent comment. Iowa currently, quite nicely holding down the cellar, must have someone. Anyone? Yes, we look to the future for “quality athletes” playing together for 3-4 seasons along with construction of a pitching staff. Those “quality athletes” dont have to be head banging phenoms. Just good teammates .

      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Cubs system can get just about anybody. Not many players fetch mutiple top 100 prospects. 2 or 3 high upside teenagers can get 90 percent of mlb players.

      1
      Reply
  8. 48-team MLB

    4 years ago

    Cubs over Athletics in 2028…assuming they’re still in Oakland. If not then it will be Cubs over Blue Jays.

    1
    Reply
    • hiflew

      4 years ago

      So they aren’t going to be good if they move?

      1
      Reply
      • Asfan0780

        4 years ago

        Yeah new stadium, new city, influx of cash so they can finally keep their own players. Also a new cable tv deal. I’ve been an A’s fan since childhood and live in the Bay Area, but even if a stadium gets approved in Oakland it would take 5 years or longer which is ridiculous. Though I have no hope in the Oakland politicians and cheap owner coming to any resolution.

        Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          they play in California. it’s not a small market, the team is just cheap. heck, they made a movie to justify them being cheap.

          1
          Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Assuming it’s las vegas the A’s move too. They have to build a new stadium. And there’s 100s of land to do that. It won’t happen anytime soon. I’d honestly relocate the Rays. Don’t know why St. Pete doesn’t want to build a new stadium. They deserve it more than the Marlins. That stadium has like 4 sellouts. And it was from the WBC (I still think rhe last one was fixed, team usa had no business winning) should’ve been Puerto Rico.

      Reply
  9. OnixConcepcionBats1000

    4 years ago

    Plenty of soon to be Ex Pirates to choose from Cubbies.
    Please. Take em all.
    Even they can’t lose 11 straight. (Or can they?)
    Either way? Take em all.
    Bucs to Cubs = same letters.
    (Please don’t continue to slide Chicago. We do not want the Pirates to somehow magically win 7 in a row somewhere by some fluke and not finish DEAD LAST.)
    Leave the Pirates alone in the standings. Remember…the division is UP there.
    Not down here in PirateVille

    1
    Reply
  10. C.K.Rebel

    4 years ago

    Predictions based on absolutely nothing but conjecture and intuition:

    Baez to OAK
    Bryant to NYM
    Contreras to LAA
    Rizzo to BOS
    Kimbrel to SF

    9
    Reply
    • A'sfaninUK

      4 years ago

      A’s need an COF more than Baez

      1
      Reply
      • C.K.Rebel

        4 years ago

        Canha will be back after the break.
        I based this move on their rumored interest in Trevor Story.
        Baez will be a lot cheaper.
        And it’s the A’s, cheap is their game

        Reply
        • C.K.Rebel

          4 years ago

          My $$ is on Story going to NYY
          They are a mess and need to retool

          Reply
    • cwsOverhaul

      4 years ago

      First couple guesses make a lot of sense. Contreras (if traded) they’d probably only move to a team that has a very good and ‘expendable’ pitching prospect as a headliner. He could get them that more than the rentals.

      Reply
      • C.K.Rebel

        4 years ago

        I based the Contreras deal on the Maddon connection and unless I’m mistaken they already tried to trade for him. Maybe ATL attempts an all Contreras backstop ?

        Reply
    • tstats

      4 years ago

      Like the ideas but what about Baez to the WSox……

      Reply
      • C.K.Rebel

        4 years ago

        I don’t think Baez would move off of SS

        Reply
        • tstats

          4 years ago

          He came up as 2B

          2
          Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          i didnt know that was Javy’s choice in this situation

          Reply
    • Franco27

      4 years ago

      Cubs only trade 2 or 3 of those guys at the most. Rizzo, Contreras, Baez all stay.

      Reply
      • C.K.Rebel

        4 years ago

        They could always resign them.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @C.K.Rebel they could also trade them and then resign them. See Hammel, J. and Chapman, A.

          Reply
        • Franco27

          4 years ago

          Absolutely. I really don’t think they are doing a full rebuild.

          Reply
        • C.K.Rebel

          4 years ago

          That’s what I was saying
          Were I fortunate enough to play baseball at the MLB level and wanted to spend the majority of my career with one team, I’d likely want to do what was “best for the team”
          So maybe accept a trade for a few months, with a handshake deal to be resigned in the offseason.
          So the team can gain assets.

          Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        @Davro Nope. All or nothing. If they aren’t planning to compete this year then keeping Rizzo and Baez does nothing for the Cubs. Then Contreras has one more year but his trade value will never be higher than it is now and trading him clears room for Miguel Amaya.

        Reply
    • Michael Macaulay-Birks

      4 years ago

      I like it, full circle for Rizzo

      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      4 years ago

      Kimbrel to Giants or Dodgers, maybe.
      Bryant to Mets or Brewers, though either could pivot to Trevor Story if the price is cheaper.
      Contreras does not get traded.
      Boston might be an OK fit for Rizzo, but I think it is more likely that he is not traded.
      Baez could stay or go, about ten places possible especially if he is willing to play SS, 2B or 3B.

      Reply
    • AusBball

      4 years ago

      I’d love Kimbrel to SF. Big Jake is pretty good but I’d prefer him and Rogers as set up men not alternating closers. Throw Bryant into that trade mix as well. Who knows how well Longoria will bounce back – D at the hot corner will be important come the big games

      1
      Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Contreras should be untouchable. I don’t think the angels have even prospects to get him. Maybe if it’s 4 players 2 being top 30 prospects. Probably not Jo Adell though. Nets don’t have enough to get Bryant.

      Rizzo needs to stay. The A’s definitely don’t have enough for baez. They’d be very dumb to trade all those players. In the end KB and Kimbrel will be dealt. KB gets the cubs 3 players and one being a top 15. Kimbrel gets much needed ML ready SP and 2 mid level prospects.

      With all that being said. I wouldn’t doubt for a minute the Ricketts are telling jed to not only trade everyone but get the least worst possible deals for them. This is a bad example abs just hypothetical. Indians offer Trison McKenzie for Ian Happ. Tom Ricketts flat out tells jed. Do not accept that trade.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        @BillyBaggins Nope. They need to either trade all of Rizzo, Bryant, Baez and Davies or none of them. Trading Bryant means waving the white flag on the season and if you do that every rental needs to go. Every single one. No exceptions.

        1
        Reply
    • hyraxwithaflamethrower

      4 years ago

      SF makes sense for Kimbrel, but so do the Jays or Astros. If I had to pick, I’d say Jays are most likely, just because their need is greatest. Plus, if the Cubs do trade Contreras, the Jays have more C’s than they need, along with other decent prospects.

      1
      Reply
      • C.K.Rebel

        4 years ago

        The Jays were my other option for that exact reason. They have a lot of positional depth.

        Reply
    • Catuli Carl

      4 years ago

      If they ship Contreras I’ll kick a puppy

      Reply
  11. bravesfan88

    4 years ago

    I like the Cubs, and don’t blame them for trying to make another run. Heck, it almost worked, but this team is just too flawed, streaky hitters, not enough pitching, etc.

    If they want to “re-tool” their GM better choose wisely who he trades off, who he resigns, and weigh all his options for the returns he is able to get. Heck, he could even press all the right buttons, and he still might be left with a team that won’t contend for a handful of seasons.

    He’s definitely in a really tough spot with their lack of a farm system, and I don’t envy his job whatsoever. He’s pretty much in a lose lose situation..

    3
    Reply
  12. mattymets

    4 years ago

    No GM should ever allow this to happen where the 3 most important players all hit free agency at the same time. Contracts need to be staggered to avoid this. If Hoyer can find a way out of this, without having to rebuild, I’ll be really impressed. Here are the options and none look great if you’re a Cubs fan:
    1) Fire sale and rebuild
    2) Trade one or two of the FAs and Kimbrel to stock the upper levels of the farm and try to retool in the offseason, but there are already a lot of holes to fill.
    3) Keep and resign all FAs and then there’s no money left for pitching.

    1
    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      What’s the point in trading one or two FA’s? Half-assing a rebuild never works.

      2
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        A full rebuild isn’t needed though. So why completely start from the ground up if you dont need too,

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @BillyBaggins Because they are 4 months from losing all those players for basically nothing is the reason why they should do that. What sounds better to you: Trading a guy for prospects or losing him for nothing? Would you rather have prospects or not have prospects, all other things equal?

          2
          Reply
        • BeeVeeTee

          4 years ago

          Actually, the Cubs are most likely going to do a full rebuild while the next three to four years are going to be dark times for the Cubs. The Cubs lack depth in their farm system from MLB ready pitchers to step up in the pitching rotation while not having position players that are ready to replace guys like Bryant, Baez and Rizzo. Bryant may be the one plater the Cubs should actually keep around during the rebuild by resigning him to a contract to retire on the Cubs while he is the one player that may get the Cubs a player or two for the future. Baez should have signed that alleged deal with the Cubs since his stock is deceasing right now while Rizzo is on the wrong side of 30.

          1
          Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      All 3 can be traded and simply signed again after the league gets a deal in place. Doesn’t matter at all they all expired at the same time. They could have been extended at any time or signed again as free agents. Or maybe just maybe they want to move on from these old expensive declining players.

      2
      Reply
    • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

      4 years ago

      The contracts were structured this way by Theo to give them maximum flexibility for the new CBA and what it might contain.

      Remember that Theo’s model in Boston was to use their cash to pick up expiring contracts and take the compensatory picks. The small market owners didn’t like this and when he moved to Chicago they changed the terms in the early 2010s CBA to close that up and prohibit QOs to players traded midseason of their final year.

      So the Cubs will enter the 2022 lockout/strike with only three meaningful contracts (Hendricks, Contreras, Heyward). Jed will probably have $100M/year to spend on FA once they know the new set of rules.

      1
      Reply
      • BeeVeeTee

        4 years ago

        Hoyer may have a little money to spend on free agents in the off-season depending if there is a strike or not or the rules behind the Collective Bargaining Agreement but the Cubs have a lot of holes to fill after this season. It seems like there will be some big changes coming in baseball with the new Collective Bargaining Agreement.

        Reply
  13. jfive

    4 years ago

    KB to Nats…read it here first 🙂

    1
    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      Kieboom!?

      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Nope. Feels like I been hearing this for 2 years. Definitely heard it from 50 to 100 people last winter.

      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      Nats gon be sellers soon

      Reply
  14. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    Why would it be a surprise to see all of those players change teams? If they are waving the white flag on this season what is the point in keeping one or two pending FA’s? To win 80 games instead of 78?

    Reply
  15. KamKid

    4 years ago

    Would the Cubs send money in a deal or would they be trying to shed salary if they sell? I don’t think of them as a franchise that should be that concerned about getting rid of salary that was already budgeted for, but they seemed kind of financially motivated in the offseason. A lot of those trade chips come with sizable salaries which might limit who is capable of taking them on as well as the return.

    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      I think they will pay salary to get the player they want.

      2
      Reply
      • KamKid

        4 years ago

        Thanks. There’s been chatter in Toronto media about Kimbrel, but I get the sense the Jays would be more interested in taking the salary than giving up a big return. Though they are pretty desperate for bullpen upgrades.

        1
        Reply
      • rondon

        4 years ago

        Trading Darvish, their most valuable starter for peanuts was an obvious salary dump and tells you all you need to know about where Ricketts is at at this point in time. He’s spent big money on FAs in the past, but not now. Ironically, Darvish is the one guy that could’ve been a real difference maker for them this season.

        Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      A full rebuild isn’t needed though. So why completely start from the ground up if you dont need too,shedding salary to the Ricketts means they’re broke. If I saved 57mol$ in trade I wouldn’t be claiming to be broke. I’d be buying everyone here season tickets to their team and a bottle of what ever their favorite liquor is. The point is the Ricketts are cheap and don’t give 2 s___$ if they lose. That 11 game losing streak is exactly what they wanted. They’d be sellers if they had a 10 game lead in first.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Again, they are four months from losing all those guys for bo diddly squat. Would you rather get something for them or not get something for them.

        And please don’t say they can “extend/re-sign them.” Ok? They can still do that if they trade them.

        1
        Reply
  16. HubcapDiamondStarHalo

    4 years ago

    If they’re not gonna win with this crew, logically they won’t win if they trade one or two of them away… So that being the case, why not trade everything you can and jumpstart the future?

    1
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Might rather have the comp pick and attendance money over what was offered.

      1
      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        LOL

        Reply
      • HubcapDiamondStarHalo

        4 years ago

        That’s a fair point.

        2
        Reply
      • MLB Top 100 Commenter

        4 years ago

        I think that is why Rizzo will stay, the return would be slight so why upset the fan base even more with Kimbrel, Bryant and Pederson on their way out.

        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @MannyBeingMVP Maximizing long-term utility from your assets is more important than making fans feel all warm and fuzzy is the reason why they would do that.

          Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        4 years ago

        At the end of the day, though, anything better than a QO pick ought to get their attention. Some things might be hard to spin optically, such as a trade with the Brewers (hypothetically, not saying they line up) and might thus take a little more to get done, but the Cubs’ only way to drive up the price is if a bidding war starts. I expect there to be one for Kimbrel, probably Bryant, considering he can also play OF, not sure on Baez and Rizzo. There will be interested parties, but probably not enough to ensure a top-notch return.

        1
        Reply
        • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

          4 years ago

          I’d like to see Jed focus on the AL East for trades. Trade to everybody and make them all step up. It’s still a close enough division, and both Tampa and Toronto have deep farm systems, Boston is contending, and the Yankees finishing fourth will not go over well at all with their fan base. Tampa also owes Kiermeier money through next year plus a 2023 buyout, so acquiring an expiring contract may be a possible swap if there are prospects added.

          1
          Reply
  17. Metsin777

    4 years ago

    I would like to see the Mets go after Craig Kimbrel and Kris Bryant. Maybe a package of Veintos, JD Davis, David Peterson gets it done.

    More than likely I can see the Braves or Phillies getting Kimbrel and the White Sox are my sleeper team for Bryant.

    1
    Reply
    • ChiSox_Fan

      4 years ago

      Not to Sox.
      Cubbies would force their expensive RF on us.

      1
      Reply
    • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

      4 years ago

      I thought Peterson was on the IL?

      Reply
  18. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    Trade all of the rentals (not just some, not just most, all).
    Trade Kimbrel and Contreras too.
    Re-sign Rizzo, Bryant and Baez in FA.
    Trade the prospects they got at the 2021 deadline for pitching.
    Presto chango! Cubs are contenders again.

    2
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Bryant is not coming back. That ship sailed when they played w his service time. Kris has a long memory. Baez possibly.

      1
      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Jesus Christ, not this again.

        Bryant is signing with the highest bidder. If that happens to be the Cubs, then that is where he will sign, service time manipulation or no service time manipulation.

        2
        Reply
        • MLB Top 100 Commenter

          4 years ago

          Bryant will be somewhere else, but it is because the Cubs will not be the high bidder, not some ancient slight. $175 million makes the crocodile tears go away real fast, and I think someone will offer Bryant 7 years at $25 million a year. Just not the Cubs.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @MannyBeingMVP No reason Cubs can’t be the highest bidder, traded or not traded.

          Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        They did nothing wrong. He even said he didn’t want to do anything. That greedy beady eyes little man Scott Boras convinced him. Bryant even knew he wouldn’t win.

        Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Trading the best catcher in baseball is a very dumb move. You extend him not trade him. Amaya and Contreras as the catching duo for the next 5-10 years would be great. Even with a discount after 2022 the Ricketts wouldn’t pay Contreras

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        @BillyBaggins…

        1. Contreras isn’t the best catcher in baseball.
        2. Hoyer can’t just wave a magic wand and extend whoever he wants.

        3
        Reply
    • BeeVeeTee

      4 years ago

      Bryant may be the only one worth signing out of him, Baez and Rizzo. Bryant can play all sorts of positions from the outfield to third base and even replace Rizzo at first base. It seems like Howard is going to replace Baez as the future short stop so there is reason to give Baez a long term extension. Rizzo is on the wrong side of 30 and showed signed of getting older.

      1
      Reply
  19. MikeD26

    4 years ago

    Kimbrel to Toronto
    KB to Nats
    Baez to Philadelphia
    Hendricks to SD
    Rizzo to Boston
    Peterson to NYY

    Reply
    • C.K.Rebel

      4 years ago

      Forgot Pederson is on a 1 yr contract.

      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      Baez to Philly? what?

      Reply
  20. inkstainedscribe

    4 years ago

    It’d be wild if the Contreras brothers switched teams (as part of a larger deal, of course).

    Reply
  21. la verdad

    4 years ago

    What happened to that Cubs dynasty we kept hearing about after they won the World Series?

    4
    Reply
    • Cubs Dynasty

      4 years ago

      Uncle Jed is still working on it. These things take time.

      Reply
    • Yep it is

      4 years ago

      Joe Maddon happened

      1
      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      They had it. Contenders every year. Not easy to win world series besides Yankees pre mlb draft and still wasn’t that easy, just easier.

      1
      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        yeah, i mean it’s not like they have been the Yankees of old or the early 2010’s Giants, but those dynasties arent common.

        Reply
  22. Cubs Dynasty

    4 years ago

    Just think of the fun Kris Bryant would have hitting in Arizona….

    1
    Reply
    • ChiSox_Fan

      4 years ago

      A “K” is a “K” in AZ as it is in Chitown.

      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        cant wait to see Moncada in the ASG…oh wait.

        Reply
    • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

      4 years ago

      With that lineup, he’d get pitched around more than prime Barry Bonds.

      1
      Reply
  23. jvent

    4 years ago

    Bryant and Hendricks to the Mets for Mauricio and Peterson or Szapucki?

    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      I think they’ll hold on to Hendricks. He’s signed thru 2023 and quality starting pitching has been hard to develop for the Cubs.

      Reply
  24. I Beg To Differ

    4 years ago

    Padres should bring back Davies for rotation depth.

    Davies and Pederson both make sense for the Padres. Tepera could also add depth to the pen for a playoff run. All 3 are rentals.

    Padres get Davies, Tepera, and Pederson
    Cubs get Mason Thompson, Eguy Rosario, and Lake Bachar

    1
    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      I could see something like this happening. Not very exciting, but if Padres could take on the $8 million due including the Pederson buyout or chip in a couple more similar prospects to have the Cubs pay down part of the salary.

      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      Davies is worth more than that alone.

      Reply
      • ABCD

        4 years ago

        There is a dearth of starters, but Davies hasn’t exactly been lights out.

        Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Rental starter Zach Davies with his

        4.28 era
        6.22 xERA
        4.81 FIP,
        5.36 xFIP
        career low 5.71 k/9
        career worst 4.69 bb/9

        is worth more alone huh Darkside?

        2
        Reply
        • BeeVeeTee

          4 years ago

          These Cubs’ fans just don’t get it!

          Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      4 years ago

      Tepera will be the Cubs’ closer when Kimbrel is dealt. Davies would command a high price, maybe Robert Hassell.. Not sure the Padres would want Pederson but they could probably get him for Bachar or McWilliams.

      Reply
      • Marcus was already taken

        4 years ago

        Wait a sec, how would Davies cost Hassell?

        1
        Reply
      • johnrealtime

        4 years ago

        Chafin will probably get the first shot at the closer role if they aren’t going straight committee

        Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Davies with his 4.28 era 6.22 xERA, 4.81 FIP, and 5.36 xFIP isn’t netting Robert Hassel or a high price.

        Davies is a rental and not a guy you’d extend a QO to anyways unless he was having a Cy Young caliber season…..which he clearly isn’t.

        Fans should temper their expectations of what cubs will get for
        Davies being a rental #4/#5 starter

        a rental 4th OF in Pederson batting .226/.294/.406

        and a 33 year old rental reliever in Tepera whos good but benefits greatly from a .186 BABIP

        3
        Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      The cubs need pitching right now. Unless any of those prospects are ML ready. It has to be a hard pass. I could honesty see Kris Bryant going to SD in a 3 team trade. Wil Myers goes elsewhere. The cubs get 2 players from the Padres and 2 from the third team.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        No one wants Wil Myers. Not even if the Padres pay all of his contract.

        1
        Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Mason Thompson is ML ready, already made his debut this year and a pitcher.

        Bachar is a pitcher 1 or 2 years away currently in AA.

        Which is why I included them instead of other pitchers in A ball.

        Reply
      • Hudson6

        4 years ago

        So who do you think those 2 players from the Padres would be?

        Reply
  25. GarryHarris

    4 years ago

    CHC just doesn’t have the SP rotation to maintain any kind of winning season for the next few seasons. Too bad, it was good while it lasted.

    2
    Reply
    • Franco27

      4 years ago

      They will have a ton of money to sign a couple of good free agent pitchers next year.

      Reply
      • ABCD

        4 years ago

        Literally, $100 million+ and not even touching the CBT. Though, the free agent market is fraught with danger.

        1
        Reply
  26. Cubs Dynasty

    4 years ago

    It will be alot easier on Hoyer if he re-signs all three; Baez, KB, and Rizzo. Yet, there’s that old adage. It goes like this:

    “When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout, Reorganize! Reorganize!”

    1
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      He resigns all 3 and they get older and badder?

      1
      Reply
  27. Wainofan

    4 years ago

    Cubs need pitching. Imagine if they could get someone like Darvish. Oh wait…..

    5
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Or Jose Quintana.

      1
      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Darvish has a 4.98 ERA over his last 8 starts, and was pulled from last night’s game due to back and ? issues.

      1
      Reply
  28. Joel Peterson

    4 years ago

    How did they get the only championship anyone has ever seen in their lifetime? By selling on guys like Samardzja and Dempster. Why on earth wouldn’t they want to do that again?????

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Very simple. The Ricketts do NOT want to win. They threw in the towel after they won.

      Reply
  29. whitesox2112

    4 years ago

    Scrubs SUCK..back up truck an dump for prospects..Go Milwaukee

    2
    Reply
  30. ChiSox_Fan

    4 years ago

    Cubbies starting a new losing streak tonight!!

    Down 8-0 after 8 innings!!

    1
    Reply
  31. Gmen777

    4 years ago

    I wonder if a trade centered around Joey Bart could net Bryant and Kimbrel? I know a lot of people are super high on Bart but I think Posey and a solid backup can hold down the fort until Bailey is ready in 2-3 years. Bart and say a Giants top 10-15 prospect for Bryant and Kimbrel, then the Cubs can ship Contreras out for more assets.

    LaStella
    Yaz
    Posey
    Bryant
    Crawford
    Longoria
    Belt
    Duggar

    Pretty darn good lineup right there with McGee, Rogers and Kimbrel as the bullpen three headed monster.

    5
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Yes

      Reply
    • Joel Peterson

      4 years ago

      Sounds interesting.

      Reply
    • MLB Top 100 Commenter

      4 years ago

      Kimbrel for Bart straight up would be a win-win. Even if the Cubs keep Contreras.

      Reply
      • Gmen777

        4 years ago

        Bart for a few months of Kimbrel is an overpay imho. I know the Yanks got Torres for Chapman five years ago but the Giants aren’t as desperate for a championship as the Cubs were.

        1
        Reply
        • joe23

          4 years ago

          I don’t see it happening, either, but Kimbrel does have a club option for 2022. Makes it slightly more possible.

          Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Why would tbe cubs want another catcher. Making solely as a backup. Nothing more. It would take more to get Bryant and Kimbrel.

      Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        4 years ago

        @Billy, because Contreras is probably gone after this year and isn’t the best catcher in the game, despite what you’ve said several times. Considering both KB and Kimbrel are rentals, I’d say the Cubs should ask for a lottery ticket in addition, but otherwise, it’s a fair deal.

        Reply
      • bot

        4 years ago

        Have fun keeping Bryant and kimbrel then- Bc if that deal doesn’t get it done- they’ll never get traded.

        And u take Bart Bc he has one of the highest ceilings in the game and it’s the best prospect u can possibly get for a Bryant deal.

        Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      If Bryant is a target long term for SF- then it’s a solid trade. If SF doesn’t have interest locking him up long term – they won’t give up Bart for him.

      SF has the right of it stock piling catchers in the NL. Atleast until there’s a DH. An NL where ur catcher doesn’t bat 8th has a lot more flexibility

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        I’m not sure that Bart should not be available. He has alarming K/W rate in AAA, at age 24.206. I’d expect something good in return, but Bart, like Adell before him, should not be untouchable.

        1
        Reply
        • Gmen777

          4 years ago

          @JoeBrady basically how I feel completely. If I’m Zaidi the only untouchable in their system is Luciano

          Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        @bot Bryant being a target long-term for SF has no bearing on them giving up Bart or not giving up Bart. Bryant is a one year rental and will be seen as such by all potential trading partners.

        1
        Reply
  32. Franco27

    4 years ago

    Realistically, what do you get back for a Rizzo or Baez? I think Bryant and Kimbrel can bring you back something of value, but not sure about the other 2. Rizzo’s numbers are mediocre, Baez is too much an all or nothing kind of player. Undisciplined hitter.

    1
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Some combination of couple of backend starter prospects, failed prospects with upside, couple of upside teenagers.

      2
      Reply
  33. Dustyslambchops23

    4 years ago

    Could see the Jays calling about Hendricks and Kimbrel, and there are some impact prospects that could help restock the Cubs system at the upper levels.

    I don’t think the jays will go after expiring contracts but it would be interesting if they also look at Bryant.

    Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      Jay’s are more likely to take on a bad contract than to deal out of the top of their farm system. Unless they acquire a bonafide ace like beiber

      1
      Reply
  34. angt222

    4 years ago

    Cubs had a good run of success. Time to start to at least retool going forward. Keep Rizzo longterm and move on from the rest.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      Trade Rizzo then re-sign him in the offseason like they did with Jason Hammel.

      2
      Reply
      • Franco27

        4 years ago

        I think if Rizzo continues to have a mediocre year and goes to free agency, he might not get the offers he thinks he should. Cubs could sneak in and re-sign him at a bargain.

        Reply
  35. Cult of Dickie Thon

    4 years ago

    That’s a shame.

    Reply
  36. canyon2129

    4 years ago

    Alas, the inevitable winds of change have arrived at Wrigley Field. They will all be memorialized and bronzed in history. Their final days now dwindling to but a few, blissfully lighting the summer nights. Never to be forgotten.

    1
    Reply
  37. Cubs Dynasty

    4 years ago

    Let’s not forget Ian Happ. He’s been getting an awful lot of bench time lately. Happ could be part of a multiple player trade. Probably will be.

    Please, Rossy. Keep this kid away from second base.

    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      what’s the value in trading him as just an ancillary piece?

      1
      Reply
      • Cubs Dynasty

        4 years ago

        Darkside I have no idea…

        Reply
  38. theodore glass

    4 years ago

    Cubs should trade everyone.

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      No they shouldn’t. That’s just dumb.

      Reply
  39. Cap & Crunch

    4 years ago

    Blessing here but they probably waited too late – I count 12 tradeable players today with 9 of them expiring at years end….or basically July 31 for Cubs value sake

    Contreras Rizzo Baez Bryant Hendriks Kimbrel as the Big Fish

    Jake M, Joc ,Davies, Trevor Willams (*2 yrs left), Tepera, and Winkler as the small fish

    Hendriks and Contreras can be traded in the offseason worst case but Id think Contreras would have more value in next 3 weeks

    Have no clue why they didn’t follow thru after Yu was traded…They have some work cut out from them…I don’t see a huge amount of buyers this year, and some of them are cheap wads like TB and Oak. Chi shouldn’t hesitate too take back bad money as well to accommodate and boast package. Might have to bundle a few with so little Big Buyers—-

    I like Rizzo to Bos but don’t see how they limbo under the CBT w/out some help…They really don’t have any expendable Bad money

    Bryant to Mets seems perfect

    Baez to Oak they take back Piscotty and get a nice deal –

    Kimbrel to CWS…lets get weird

    Angels get Hendriks and Contrearas in a mega deal

    OFC SD will get one of the above ruining my work but it’s a lot of work for the Cubs in a little time. Better start working those phones

    Id like My Dodgers to take a look at Davies and possibly Tepera on the cheap if his inj checks out Ok

    Reply
  40. Jesse Cook

    4 years ago

    Just an idea here, nothing more or nothing less, but what IF the Cardinals send DeJong, Bader, cash considerations and their 1st round draft pick in the 2021 draft or 2022 to the Cubs for Ian Happ,or Javier Baez and maybe one of their young left handers Braylin Marquez { I apologize if I misspelled his 1st name} and or Justin Steele. Bader and DeJong are still relatively young and under team control for the next couple of years and both of them are tremendous fielders with power. Just my opinion, but if Bader can learn to put the ball in play consistently and be more patient at the plate he could be a 15-20 homerun hitter and possibly win a gold glove in centerfield for several years while stealing 20+ bases. DeJong has the power to hit 25-30 home runs a year consistently. If he played in Wrigley 81 games a year he very well could do it. For the Cardinals they could put Happ in center or 2nd base, I admit as a Cardinal fan I have always liked Happ because he can play any position on the field without much of a problem and be a switch hitting power hitter they need in their lineup or if they got Baez they can put him at short and keep Edman at 2nd then put Nootbar in right with Carlson manning centerfield on a daily basis. With either Marquez or Steele you get a very young and potentially really good left hander that could fill the Cardinals starting rotation in a couple of years right along with another young potentially very good lefty in Liberatore. The way both teams are right now neither one of them have a snow ball’s in hell’s chance of making the playoffs and the major league players I mentioned probably could use a change of scenery even if it’s with their arch rival to see if it rejuvenates their career’s in some fashion. I know this has a ZERO chance of happening and that I will get ridiculed for suggesting it, but I think it’s fun just to get other people’s opinions and ideas. I also know the Cardinals need starting pitching and maybe another reliever or 2 but with them sitting in a tie for 3rd with the Cubs at 43-45 and 9.5 games back of Milwaukee, any top of the rotation pitcher or reliever{s} they are considering in a trade may not help them this year. if they go 37-37 over their last 74 games of the year they will finish below .500 for the 1st time in about 2 decades. Would that be enough for them to shake things up this coming winter? If not, it could be a very long while before the Cardinals get back in the playoffs let alone win another world championship which would ultimately leave to Arenado wanting out of St.Louis in the near future.

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      You can’t trade draft picks bub!

      3
      Reply
      • Jesse Cook

        4 years ago

        Damn it you’re right I totally forgot about that. Thanks for the correction.

        Reply
  41. Jesse Cook

    4 years ago

    Lead not leave.

    Reply
  42. frankf

    4 years ago

    Silly fan trades proposals are my favorite:

    How about Trevor Williams and Jason Heyward for Wander Franco. We can even throw in Rafael Ortega to sweeten the deal.

    1
    Reply
    • Jesse Cook

      4 years ago

      @frankf The Rays would DEFINITELY accept that!! LOL!

      Reply
  43. frankf

    4 years ago

    In all seriousness, I hate to say it, but one of the more realistic trade partners for KB is The Brewers. Their offense is middling at best (just dont tell Jake Arrietta,) and while their farm system doesn’t have much, the Brewers are notoriously aggressive buyers when they manage to contend.

    Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      What’s the proposal then ? Bryant will get a QO so it’s got to be a better return than a pick around 30. Brewers system is so light – idk how they can offer more than that

      Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      Brewers fans, who would you give up for Rizzo?

      Reply
    • Brick House Coffee Tables Inc

      4 years ago

      The Brewers had to pick up Rowdy Tellez because their upper farm system is so bad that they couldn’t find someone to stand at 1B. AAA Nashville had Hernan Perez playing in CF.

      Obvious rivalry issues aside, they have nobody who the Cubs would accept for Bryant. Maybe they could swing a deal for Petersen.

      Reply
    • hiflew

      4 years ago

      Cubs aren’t dealing Bryant or Rizzo or Baez in division to the Brewers, even if their offer is the best (which it is unlikely to be). It won’t happen. Too much blow back from their fans and the local media.

      Reply
      • Thomas James

        4 years ago

        Brewers fan. Yeah not a fan of trading in the division unless it’s minor like a few trades they did with the Pirates.
        The few quality prospects the Brewers do have would only be available for controllable players anyways. I just don’t see any interest and thinking they could provide a huge upgrade unless it’s for Kimberl.

        Reply
  44. Fred K. Burke

    4 years ago

    There’s easily 10 players on this
    Cubs team that could be moved and would draw interest from other organizations. But here’s what really makes me concerned about the direction and future of this team. 1) Can Jed Hoyer receive an acceptable return for whom ever he trades? Personally I don’t trust the front office. 2) Will ownership-The Ricketts, be willing to spend $$ and add free agents?
    Again, personally I don’t believe they are willing to do that. It’s looking like a long and trying time for the Cubs.

    Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      Best way to rebuild is to pick at the top of the draft. Cubs can easily run a max payroll, and have proven to do so in the past, but if your whole team is made up of 4/5 free agents than best u will ever do is be middle of pack like they are now and like the Phillies are. Have to have a decent mix

      1
      Reply
    • Franco27

      4 years ago

      Cubs payroll will be increased from around 155 million this year to probably around 180-190 million next. If you don’t re-sign pending free agents, you will have around 120 million to spend in the off-season. Cubs were top 3 in payroll in both 2019 and 2020. They didn’t sign free agents in those years because the payroll was already bloated to over 200 million, and didn’t want to exceed luxury tax. They didn’t spend this year and reduced payroll because of the economic downturn due to pandemic and Wrigley renovation debt load. Hoyer has already said that budget will be increased as things return to normal.

      In other words, they will sign free agents to fill in holes, but it will be hard to fill every position with free agents. They need to retain a few guys, make some key trades, and build around that.

      Reply
  45. Bob333

    4 years ago

    Dump them all if possible just like the Phillies clean house managers/coaches included.

    Reply
  46. cgallant

    4 years ago

    Kris Bryant for Bobby Dalbec strait up. Done.

    Reply
  47. Ghost of past pirates

    4 years ago

    this guy is baldyphoenixtroll

    Reply
  48. Dan Hunter

    4 years ago

    Bryant would fit perfect for the Mets and long term with Cohens money.

    1
    Reply
  49. Central Valley

    4 years ago

    As a Giants fan, I could see Zaidi being interested in Kris Bryant, Craig Kimbrel, Joc Peterson and possibly Javier Baez.

    I have no idea what a trade package would look like, I do imagine Luciano would be untouchable though.

    Reply
    • hiflew

      4 years ago

      If you are wanting to trade for all four of those guys, there would be no such thing as an untouchable.

      3
      Reply
      • Central Valley

        4 years ago

        No, I think Luciano would be untouchable. Bart or even Ramos could possibly be had though.

        I wasn’t implying that Zaidi would want all 4 of those guys together in a trade package or nothing. I was only thinking the Giants could see some interest in each of those guys for different reasons.

        If I had to guess, Kris Bryant would be the one with the highest interest. But who knows, I don’t make a living assembling MLB rosters.

        Reply
  50. Goose

    4 years ago

    If I were the Cubs I would move all three. You could easily bulk up your farm system with some good talent. Since they won the World Series they are in that no mans land of being decent. Good enough to tease but not really a real threat. They are all looking at big contracts and do you want to tie guys up at their age for 5 + years of big money?

    1
    Reply
    • hiflew

      4 years ago

      If I am an actual Cubs fan and not just a bandwagon fan, yes I do want to tie up guys at that age for 5+ years.

      It just amazes me how some people really just cheer for laundry and stat lines instead of the people actual under the uniform and behind the numbers.

      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        I love Yaz, Smith, Dewey and others, but they might no longer be capable of playing for the RS. I absolutely understand what you are saying about having ‘real’ RS players to root for. But I also don’t want them to be mediocre just so I can keep rooting for the same guys.

        3
        Reply
      • Goose

        4 years ago

        Remember, the Cubs didn’t finally win the World Series with that plan. Theo came in and blew it up and people were ticked. With the days of free agency, keeping a team together forever just isn’t a high probability anymore.

        Reply
        • dodger1958

          4 years ago

          Few teams will give up elite prospects for rentals. Not the Dodgers. Not going to see them trade Gray. He is on the mend and will be called up in a few weeks if all goes well.

          Reply
  51. tmetz1023

    4 years ago

    Joc to White Sox seems to make sense in the quest for OF help and a lefty bat, especially with Eaton DFA’d, Goodwin a shaky filler (although holding his own for now) and Joc’s ST contract. Would the Sox give up Adolfo or Sheets or involve a package including Burger + a couple other prospects (perhaps if Bryant is out of town)…thoughts?

    Reply
    • ChiSox_Fan

      4 years ago

      No Joc.
      Sox loaded with OF. Sheets has better future with Sox in the OF.
      Not giving up anyone for Cubs cr$p.

      Reply
      • tmetz1023

        4 years ago

        Interesting, I’m high on Sheets now although question his upside and wonder how long the Sox are content with him in the OF / how long he’ll be blocked at 1st and DH (Cubs might use him as a Rizzo replacement). He’s a traditional 1B like Vaughn (who I suspect won’t be long for the OF after this year) and Eloy was questionable in left before the injury meaning he could get a lot of ABs at DH. Also think Micker will be a decent pro but Sox have gone with Vaughn, Goodwin, Eaton, Hamilton and even Luis Gonzalez over him, so doubt he’ll get an extended look this year considering Sox should be going for it and he’s still in AA. I have been hoping to see Burger get called up for a couple weeks and I have feeling the Sox are showcasing him to flip. After 2 achilles he’s not Kris Bryant despite being a former 1st rounder, could fill that hole as well on North side. Seems like Joc’s versatility in the OF would be worth something as a 4th outfielder with power, playing against rightys. Maybe not Joc, not sure how many guys out there are available that can play right & center and hit for either plus power or average from the left side (I’d take either for Sox). Might take some pressure off La Pantera if/when Loubob comes back this year. Not sure we’ll see him at 100% even in postseason but that’d be sweet if he was.

        Reply
  52. TradeAcuna

    4 years ago

    Braves better avoid Kimbrel.

    Reply
  53. Bob333

    4 years ago

    Kimbrel and Bryant to Phillies if Bryant signs long term.Phils send Hoskins 1b,Marchan C Howard P and Suarez P and of Randolph

    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      @Bob333 Would make more sense for the Phillies to just sign Bryant in the offseason and keep their prospects.

      1
      Reply
  54. 48-team MLB

    4 years ago

    2021: Red Sox over Padres

    2022: Braves over White Sox

    2023: Dodgers over Rays

    2024: White Sox over Padres

    2025: Astros over Mets

    2026: Indians over Giants

    2027: Yankees over Brewers

    2028: Cubs over Athletics

    2029: Cardinals over Orioles

    2030: Braves over Angels

    Reply
    • Franco27

      4 years ago

      2031: Las Vegas Gamblers over Portland Protesters

      2
      Reply
      • 48-team MLB

        4 years ago

        The Nashville Stars dynasty will include titles in ‘34, ‘36, ‘38 and ‘39.

        1
        Reply
    • Cubs Dynasty

      4 years ago

      In 2028, will Jason Heyward still be starting in right field?

      Reply
  55. Franco27

    4 years ago

    I know a lot of Cubs fans think Cubs will restock the farm system with deadline trades, but most rentals don’t bring you much back. You will be disappointed if you think Rizzo, Baez, or Pederson will bring you back high level prospects. The guys that will bring the most back are Kimbrel, Bryant and then non-rentals like Contreras and Hendricks.

    1
    Reply
    • ICanSeeTheFuture

      4 years ago

      While they don’t bring back a ton, I still think trading away some guys makes sense. You hopefully finish with a lower record for a higher pick, and you get some potential solid pieces in return.

      I’d rather them sell off some assets, then stand pat, finish at maybe .500 and hopefully these guys perform well enough for a QO.

      I don’t disagree with you btw, was just adding my thoughts to your sensible post.

      1
      Reply
      • Cubs Dynasty

        4 years ago

        Davro…our Cubs have always relied on rentals and trades during competitive seasons. Stock up their farm system to win NL pennants? Hmmmm. I’m waiting..

        Reply
  56. metsie1

    4 years ago

    The Cubs waited too long to maximize the value of their assets. Once they made the decision to trade Darvish they should have gone full sell mode. Baez, Bryant, Rizzo or Kimbrel could all help a contender. However, the three expiring contracts are nothing more than fancy rentals. Hard to believe someone is going to offer top prospects or fair value for a 3 month rental. The trading of Darvish made one last run difficult if not impossible. The Cubs are going to pay for this mistake for years.

    1
    Reply
  57. Dan Hunter

    4 years ago

    Bryant and Hendricks to Mets.

    1
    Reply
  58. Dan Hunter

    4 years ago

    Sounds vey reasonable..

    Reply
  59. bobbyrussell1973

    4 years ago

    Bryant and Kimberly

    1
    Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      “Kimberly”

      Reply
  60. whyhayzee

    4 years ago

    MLB should start a new team in Woodstock. All the Santana’s, Baez, Who on first, Garcia, Put me in Coach, Jefferson, Hendricks (I know), Stone, MacDonald, Canned Heat on the mound, some random guy who retired ten years ago, Guthrie, McGee, and a play where number 25 plays shortstop and tosses the ball to the second baseman, except when they’re playing the Cubs or the White Sox.

    1
    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      You included Sly Stone. You get a +1 for that. A musical genius that not nearly enough people know about.

      Reply
  61. revolver

    4 years ago

    Contreras and Winkler to CWS . Grandall and Cease to Cubs.

    Reply
    • tmetz1023

      4 years ago

      I think the Sox would see right through taking Grandall off our hands while also asking for Cease (back). I’m not sure my despise for Grandall (more so his contract) outweighs my appreciation for Cease. People will start to appreciate Collins now that Larussa can no longer artificially keep his #’s down by playing him almost exclusively against lefties (to keep his arbitration $ lower is guess???) and flash in the pan Mercedes could play vs lefties and put up decent #’s ala James McCann 2020. Winkler could be an intriguing piece to bolster the pen with Marshall and Bummer sidelined. Would probably be a throw-in / value add to a bigger deal. I’d consider Joc and Winkler, cash (Joc’s contract) and PTBNL(s) for Burger and Sheets. Still think Sox should be getting a little more but IMO that’s more realistic.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version