![]() |
|
|
| |
« Indians To Discuss Long-Term Deal With Betancourt | Main | Brewers Rumors: Crede, Riske, Gagne, Dotel »
ESPN's Jerry Crasnick has been working hard all day to get us some good rumors. Here's the latest.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534b4bcf5970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Crasnick's Latest: Encarnacion, Hamilton, Jenkins:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I know this is way off topic, but does anyone know how Jaun Encarnacion is? I havent heard anything about him since he got hit in the head by that foul ball
Posted by: 04Forever | December 03, 2007 at 07:18 PM
His eye socket got obliterated. A comeback will be nearly impossible.
I think that Edwin is far more valuable than Lowry. If Lowry's peripherals catch up to him he will be a piss poor pitcher. Edwin still has a lot of hitting potential. And Lowry going from the NL West parks and pitching 1/2 his games in the Giants park to going to Great American...ouch. I think that The Reds will go after someone better than Lowry but less than the Linecums and Bedards of the world. Perhaps a Scott Hatteberg for Edwin Jackson type swap? The Rays supposedly need a good lefty hitting 1B/DH/clubhouse/cheap guy and Hatty fits the bill. Maybe a prospect goes to CIN as well, Jackson could fill out the rotation and hopefully reach some of his potential.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 03, 2007 at 07:23 PM
funny that the cubs had hamilton and now may have to give up hill to get him back..
Posted by: junbun | December 03, 2007 at 07:24 PM
There is no way Hill will be traded in the division...especially for a guy the cubs gave up for a couple hundred grand. I know it was already set up and blah blah...but Hendry is NOT going to give up Hill for Hamilton. What about Marshall and Gallegher? That way they have two guys to fall back on? I don't know...just a thought...but thats probably not enough. They can have Cedeno or Murton too...? Hell...take them all.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 03, 2007 at 07:24 PM
No kidding. The Cubs sold Hamilton to the Reds for what, $25,000? And now they would give up a #3 starter in Hill? How would Hendry justify that to any new owner when trying to keep his job?
Posted by: Gov Arnold | December 03, 2007 at 07:29 PM
If you are going to knock Lowry for pitching in a pitcher's park, than you must knock Edwin for hitting in a hitter's park.
Although the talk of the town this off-season seems to be prospects, it doesn't make a lot of sense for the Giants to give up a proven LHP in Lowry, who is a proven winner in the MLB, for a young 3B who has a troubled past and has failed to play an entire season at the big league level.
Lowry is more valuable
Posted by: The Juice | December 03, 2007 at 07:34 PM
This might sound crazy, but what about Hamilton for Edwin Jackson? The Reds are obviously interested in Jackson and the Rays are seeking a lefthanded otufielder who can back up at first base. interesting note, the rays were actually talking about converting Hamilton to first base before the Cubs selected him in the rule V. Could the Rays get Hamilton back? Seems like an interesting enough trade idea.
Posted by: delmonmvp | December 03, 2007 at 07:40 PM
Your argument hurts it more than it helps, Juice.
Encarnacion and Lowry's career home/road splits:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/bsplit.cgi?n1=encared01&year=2007
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=lowryno01&year=00
Lowry has given up more earned runs in about 90 less innings in his career on the road than at home. His ERA at home is 3.42 while his road ERA is 4.85 which would get worse if he went to American Great for most of his games. Encarnacion on the other hand has hit 30 points higher on the road and his OPS is .799 on the road and .790 at home.
Encarnacion is more valuable
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 03, 2007 at 07:43 PM
If I'm the Phillies wouldn't Xavier Nady make the most sense to try to trade for. Right handed hitter, plays both corner outfield positions and first base.
Posted by: bney7 | December 03, 2007 at 07:52 PM
Have a look at Edwin's final 2 months, he was excellent and really looked to turn the corner.
He was awful in July, but after he got rolling, he was an above average option at third base.
He gets on base, doesn't strike out all that much, and has some pop in his bat.
If the Reds were foolish enough to accept only Lowry for him, it would be a steal for SF and their rebuilding efforts.
Posted by: RWS | December 03, 2007 at 07:53 PM
Thanks for the stat links gogo, but look at the sample sizes.
A proven Major League LHP is MORE valuable than a troubled inexperienced 3B
Posted by: The Juice | December 03, 2007 at 07:53 PM
Is there a reason why you used encarnacion's 2007 stats and lowry's career stats?
Way to manipulate the numbers to make your point.
Over Encarnacions CAREER he has hit 19 points higher at home and his OPS is 81 points higher at home, which tends to disprove your point. Nice try.
Posted by: SDSU Aztec | December 03, 2007 at 07:54 PM
Hamilton for Jackson? What planet are you from?
Posted by: sl | December 03, 2007 at 07:55 PM
What about
Dontrelle Willis
for
Hamilton
Encarncion
pitching prospect not named Homer Bailey?
Then the Marlins go back to the Dodgers and ask for Kemp,Billingsley/Kerhsaw, and Loney for Miguel! It's a win win in both trades for them.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 03, 2007 at 08:01 PM
Just out of curiousity The Juice...what do u refer to when u refer to Encarancion's troubled past...i am unaware of any major issues w/ Encarcion
Posted by: cincy_11 | December 03, 2007 at 08:03 PM
^^^
uhh... no. Willis isn't worth Hamilton alone.
Posted by: Blue | December 03, 2007 at 08:04 PM
First of all, the Cubs never owned the rights to Hamilton. They traded their rights to that pick in the Rule IV draft. The Cubs did not trade Hamilton ... ever. Secondly, Hendry and the Cubs were not the only team to think Hamilton was far from ready for a MLB job. Why does no one talk about the Rays mistake? All it would have cost them is a spot on their 40 man roster. Like one they were using for Juan Salas or Brian Stokes.
I don't think Rich Hill is too much, but the relative value of proven starting pitching would require the Reds to throw in something more than Hamilton. I don't know why the Reds would be trying so hard to get rid of Hamilton. Bruce isn't ready yet, and Griffey can't play CF. What's the point of getting a Rich Hill-type if they are going to have Norris Hopper in the everyday lineup? And don't give me the Ryan Freel business either. Hamilton is a find, and while I appreciate the "cash in" mentality, I just wouldn't find that scenario compelling for either team.
Posted by: AJ | December 03, 2007 at 08:04 PM
The Reds would trade Hamilton in a heart beat straight up for Willis. Hamilton has been in the majors how many years and actually put up numbers?
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | December 03, 2007 at 08:08 PM
Lowry is crap anyway you slice it. Encarnacion isn't.
Anyone else think Hatty could be a target for TB?
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 03, 2007 at 08:09 PM
From MLB.COM
Chicago Cubs
Selected OF Josh Hamilton from the Tampa Bay Devil Rays; Traded OF Josh Hamilton to the Cincinnati Reds in exchange for cash considerations;
And whats the Rule 4 Draft?
Posted by: SDSU Aztec | December 03, 2007 at 08:12 PM
The troubled past of Encarnacion refers to the multiple times he was benched in the minors for "behavioral issues" and when he earlier this year he was taken out MID GAME for lack of hustling. Those are issues you avoid if at all possible.
Posted by: The Juice | December 03, 2007 at 08:13 PM
There is no way, I repeat, no way that the Reds will trade Hamilton within the division. If he plays, and there are plenty of ifs, he has the talent to be one of the best in the game. He's an absolute joy to watch play. If he's traded, it has to be for a lights out starter and would need to be West Coast or AL.
EE is a solid player, who hasn't played his best ball yet. As a Reds fan, I just don't like the lack of fire. That and the hundred dollar stops and 10 cent throws. He's on the verge.
Why not convince overrated Adam Dunn to waive the trade clause. I think SF needs another overweight power hitting left fielder who can't play defense. At least you know Dunn's not on the juice. He just drank alot of it.
Go Krivsky.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 03, 2007 at 08:13 PM
Attitude issues don't mean he's worth a 5th starter. He hasn't had a Dukes like fallout and while he has put up results, Dukes really never did that much in the majors. The Delmon Young trade will tell you how much teams care about "behavioral issues" and thinking a pop up was hit in foul terriotory.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 03, 2007 at 08:18 PM
Would Lowry be your 5th starter? Seems to me like Lowry had better numbers than arroyo, belisle, and the endless stream of garbage pitchers with 6.00+ ERAs you were sending out there every 5th night. I agree I value Encarnacion more than Lowry, but that does not make him a 5th starter, especially on the Reds.
Posted by: SDSU Aztec | December 03, 2007 at 08:23 PM
Lowry might be the Reds #3 honestly, and I think that's what they're shooting for. Cueto and Maloney will be up at some point, but not to start the year. Bailey would be #4, Belisle #5.
Trading EE also opens a spot for Jeff Keppinger who tore it up last year.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 03, 2007 at 08:26 PM
He would be worse than Cueto and Bailey I'm guessing. He's only pitched 150 innings each of the past two seasons. Someone with a WHIP of over 1.5 in such a weak division would probably be a 5th starter in the park the Reds have. He's just not that good and no smart GM would give much for him.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 03, 2007 at 08:27 PM
What exactly is overrated about Adam Dunn? Only one all-star game and highest MVP finish is 26th, so nobody in the game really thinks much of him. I guess the only people who give him any credit are people who realize winning baseball games is important.
Posted by: Teetz | December 03, 2007 at 08:32 PM
Lots of people call leaving Josh Hamilton off the 40 man a mistake on the Rays part.
I'm sure that the Rays and Cubs thought Hamilton was a talented athlete. But he also hadn't played in 03, 04, or 05 because he was either hurt or abusing drugs. When he did return in 2006, he put up a 260/327/360 line in LoA.
Add to this 2 bad knees...
How were the Cubs supposed to know to keep this guy on the 25 man roster all year?
Posted by: wihargo | December 03, 2007 at 08:33 PM
Wow, no love for the 14 game winner? What happened to him after 05 when the K's dropped off so dramatically?
It's interesting that in two days the Reds have been linked to Lincecum, Cain and Lowry. They have to be talking quite a bit.....
Posted by: bweav44 | December 03, 2007 at 08:37 PM
Dunn has one skill, hitting tape measure homeruns....with no one on base. People who think he's so great always point to OBP, but that's been declining steadily. He doesn't play ANY defense in left, and won't work hard enough to move to 1st base and has no speed. For a college quarterback, his arm stinks. How come a guy with 40+ homers annually can't hit cleanup? Career best 106 rbi's? A joke. He should have 120-130.
I call him Adam Kingman. Hopefully the Reds don't sign him longterm. With Votto, Bruce and Hamilton they have enough lefties for awhile.
He may not be overrated nationally, but he sure is by Red's fans.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 03, 2007 at 08:46 PM
By the way, the Rule 5 draft trade between the Cubs and Reds was made before the Cubs knew who the draft pick would be. They learned only after the deal the name was Hamilton, Josh. The Reds didn't want to take the chance someone else would get him, so they "traded up" so to speak. The Cubs never really had a chance to keep him.
ps-Sorry to hijack the thread.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 03, 2007 at 08:49 PM
What do you mean? His OBP is as high as ever, getting on-base 38-39% of the time. It isn't his fault the Reds are so bad...and besides, he's got a good OPS with RISP. He walks a lot with RISP but that's how he does. He's very valuable offensively.
Posted by: gogopalehose | December 03, 2007 at 08:58 PM
"Dunn has one skill, hitting tape measure homeruns....with no one on base."
He has the same homerun rate with men on base and without men on base.
"People who think he's so great always point to OBP, but that's been declining steadily."
.388, .387, .365, .386. Lifetime .381 OBP...declining my ass.
You think like Dusty Baker and I pray to the heavens the Reds trade Dunn away.
Posted by: Teetz | December 03, 2007 at 08:59 PM
still dont know if i would consider that troubled.....Josh Hamilton= Troubled Past...Encarnacion's Lack of Hustle= Half of the MLB lol
Posted by: cincy_11 | December 03, 2007 at 09:29 PM
I would love to see the Hammer come back to the Rays. When the Reds picked him up last year they became the most hated franchise in MLB to me. Something the Reds were worried about, I know.
Edwin Jackson makes sense but it's gonna take more than that to get him, and I don't think the Rays are going to pursue it.
The Marlins could deal something like Sergio Mitre and Sean West for Hamilton, but I believe they'll fill their CF vacancy via a Miggy trade. I don't think the Rangers have enough to offer in pitching and would be better suited for a short-term deal with Andruw. Padres? Giants? ..Twins? Hamilton could be a hot commodity once Rowand and Andruw are locked up.
Posted by: DRayDude | December 03, 2007 at 09:43 PM
Great stats on Dunn, should've double checked before I opened my mouth. I still can't stand him though.
On his behalf, he did do a much better job of hitting the ball the other way towards the end of last year and actually had some rbi base hits.
He's just never shown any inclination to working hard enough to be an upper echelon player. With his lack of speed and range, he should be at first. He half assed it one spring training and quit.
He's content to be a one dimensional guy and pick up his emmense check. If pitching and defense wins championships, he doesn't really help you.
Posted by: bweav44 | December 03, 2007 at 09:53 PM
Just wanted to point out also that Dunn Lowered his errors from 13 in 2006 to 6 in 2007. For him being so slow also he stole 9 out of 11 attempts on stealing bases. Fielding percentage went up 16 points also. Now it was not a great one but Dunn is sure trying to improve and that means a lot to the fans. Also his batting average went up in 2007. It was .234 in 2006 and in 2007 he hit .264. Again still not great but for a major power hitter I would definately take that.
As far as Reds getting a decent number 3 guy it is going to be tough but I think they can do it without selling off every good prospect they have. As far as a name I am not too sure. I keep hoping for something big to move Harrang to number 2 but I don't think it will happen that way but I can dream.
Posted by: JayTheRed | December 03, 2007 at 10:46 PM