MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Vote For MLBTR | Main | Phillies, Mets Made Offers To Lohse? »

Rosenthal's Latest: Prior, Bedard, Haren

The rumor mill is picking up today, thanks in no short part to Ken Rosenthal.  Check out his latest column.

  • Rosenthal believes the Padres are Mark Prior's first choice, but as usual they won't pay as much as other teams.  Both Texas clubs are in the lead for Prior currently.  Rosenthal also names the Cards, Mets, and Yankees are suitors, as we knew.  The Pirates, by the way, have not inquired.
  • Talks for Erik Bedard have slowed down, because the Orioles aren't impressed with the offers.  The Mariners, Reds, and Mets are the top contenders.  Rosenthal indicates that the Reds may be overvaluing Homer Bailey, compared to the perception of other clubs.
  • Interesting late-game suitors for Dan Haren: the Rockies and Braves.  You wonder, then, whether they'll also inquire on Bedard. 
  • Rosenthal notes that the Chris Burke acquisition could be a sign that the D'Backs won't re-sign Orlando Hudson.  Burke will have to show something first though.
  • The Orioles don't seem likely to flip Luke Scott; they like his style.  The guy could hit 30 bombs this year, in the opinion of Ron Shandler and Co.
  • The Twins are up to 39 on their 40 man roster, so they'll have to be creative to take back four players in a Johan Santana deal.  It could mean including a player with Johan.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534ba63d6970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rosenthal's Latest: Prior, Bedard, Haren:

Comments

Which team is worse? The Nationals for signing veterans to long-term contracts or the Pirates for wanting to sign veterans to long-term contracts but not being able to do so? I mean, the Pirates failure to get guys is probably for the best team interest but what happens when they really need to sign someone? Additionally, we can make fun of the Nationals now, but some of those guys might come in handy and Loria really screwed over that organization and the farm system is still paying the price. The Nats almost have to sign replacement level guys to contracts because they don't even have replacement minor league players.

What veterans are you talking about? Belliard and Young? They've both turned out pretty useful so far, and they were fairly cheap - Belliard especially so.

As for the farm system, yeah, it was ransacked, but it's gotten a ton better the last couple of years, and isn't as bad as you seem to think. AAA is, but the rest is going to do really well this year!

Why wouldn't the D'backs resign Hudson?

Brian Buscher is redundant after the Lamb signing, and Darnell McDonald has always been redundant. So I don't think the 40-man roster problem is real.

Or rather, the 40-man being full problem. The problem where the Twins don't have a clue how to manage to 40-man is obviously still around.

Am I the only one who considers Bedard not a sure thing? He had a spectacular 2007, but he also set career highs in almost every significant category by a WIDE margin: 50 more K's than his previous best, .60 better ERA, .26 better WHIP, .046 better BAA, 2.99 better K/9. He had an uber-career year at 28 years old. Plus, he got injured (probably from being overpitched). Maybe I'm cynical, but I'd like to see him put up another solid season before I'm convinced he can repeat that success.

Let me just say that I would not mind seeing Bedard in a Braves uniform. I have to wonder what would be required. I have a feeling it may be that the Braves are just trying to up the ante for the Mets to make the trade, maybe push them towards trading Reyes (which probably won't happen anyway).

It is so obvious that Santana is going to get dealt to the Red Sox along with Craig Monroe. Where do you people not see this. Monroe is going to be this years Bobby Kielty. Mark it down and when it happens you can bow to the master!

wildo05: I really hope you're wrong. Monroe is pathetic. He's reached league-average in OBP once in his career, barely. At least Kielty can hit lefties, which is what the Sox needed; Monroe OBPed .309 vs. lefties last year.

So if the D'backs don't sign Hudson because of the Burke signing (why wouldn't they sign a GG 2nd baseman?) would he become a free agent? Is this a salary thing? Not sure how that works... somebody explain! Is it like the Prior situation?

I wonder who the Braves would ahve offered to get Haren... Doesn't seem like they have anyone Beane would want. Maybe that was their way of getting their foot in the door on Blanton? As of right now though, Atlanta's pretty much locked into it's starting rotation, so I'm not sure why they would even be after Oakland for a starter.

I was very happy to hear about the Braves being in on Haren. I imagine the conversation went like this.
Wren: So let's talk about Haren
Beane: We want Yunel Escobar
Wren: Shut the hell up. (Click)

Lets just say that if the Braves could get Blanton for a reasonable price it would be huge. Smoltz, Hudson,Glavine, Blanton, James.
Blanton and james as the 4/5 would be a very solid back end. Way less pressure on James, give reyes and jurjjens another yearin the minors would be very beneficial. This would also allow Blanton who would be cost controlled for a few more years to step into the #3 spot in 09, and then have 3 options for the 4/5. this could be the making of a solid rotation for the next few years. The roration would also be very cheap in this stretch as well.

Fine Ham: The Braves have plenty to offer. Gorkeys Hernendez, Chuck James, Brent Lillibridge, Martin Prado, Jordan Schafer. They could have done it.

I agree with you Metafrantic. Bedard was above average but wasn't great before las season. Not to mention that he has never thrown 200 innings in a season. If he does have another great season though, any trade now could seem like a deal. I view it as a kind of high risk, high reward sort of thing.

Actually we do have a ton to offer, but a trade from the braves would have to be a quantity trade instead of a quality trade. If that is the case, I really do not thin the Braves are going to give up a bounty like they gave up for Teixera for a pitcher. I also like the fact we are going after another pitcher, and would love for use to acquire one, but even Blanton, who I have wanted all along, may be too much now that Haren is off the Market.

One Suggestion however, Ian Snell of the Pirates. Perhaps Chris Duffy could be thrown in as well.

Actually we do have a ton to offer, but a trade from the braves would have to be a quantity trade instead of a quality trade. If that is the case, I really do not thin the Braves are going to give up a bounty like they gave up for Teixera for a pitcher. I also like the fact we are going after another pitcher, and would love for use to acquire one, but even Blanton, who I have wanted all along, may be too much now that Haren is off the Market.

One Suggestion however, Ian Snell of the Pirates. Perhaps Chris Duffy could be thrown in as well.

My main concern would be that after trading for Haren, the Braves would have no farm system left, and like I said before, I'm not sure if any of our guys are Beane-types.

I disagree, Beane loves MLB ready prospects, and with lillibridge he would get the young shortstop he wanted, and we also have Schafer,Devine, Brandon Jones, Jair Jurrjens/Jo-Jo Reyes, that package probably would have gotten a deal done, as their depth is closer to contributing at the majors than the dbacks offer was.

I guess a positive to take away from this is that the braves still HAD the pieces to get haren if they wanted which says alot considering what they gave up to get Tex. I am still all for getting another starter in here though.

If Luke Scott hits 30 HRs this year tell Mr. Mitchell to add an appendix to his report.

"If he [Bedard] does have another great season though, any trade now could seem like a deal. I view it as a kind of high risk, high reward sort of thing."

That's true, and I suppose for a team with a SP need and a deep farm system it could make sense. But it's seriously the kind of deal that could make or break a team's postseason chances for 3-5 years.

I was just pleased by the whole Braves-Haren situation. The fact that they were looking to add a top tier pitcher, but were not willing to give away the future of the franchise. One day there is going to be another of those Hudson deals. Man the A's got fleeced.

Ahh bravesbeast I see you're posting again

It would appear you either did not see or chose to ignore our requests for an explanation from you.

So once again, since you seem to know so much, could you explain how the Yankees undoubtedly have a better bullpen and starting rotation than the bluejays...we were all looking forward to hearing from you..

Ahh Go Bosox yes that comment....

Well i guess I was wrong when it comes to the stats, yes sorry about that, however I will say that the difference between the two offenses is far greater than the difference between two pitching staffs, and with the addition of chamberlin as well as hughes being one year older, the difference between the two staffs will probably shrink, but you could say thayt for the Blue jays with marcum and mcgowan as well, so pick your poison. So if you want your glory, yes I was wrong. However, the fact that the yankees have brought everybody back without the bluejays making any real significant moves does mean that the Blue Jays are not going to make up for the 11 game difference, (and no BJ Ryan is not going to make that big of a difference.) Oh yes, btw,

Blue Jays team ERA 4.00
Yankees ERA 4.50

that .5 run differential does not make up for the

Yankees runs per game 5.98
Blue Jays 4.64

Until the Jays ERA can make up for teh difference between run production, or at least not have the run differential be less than the double the ERA differential, the yankees are the better team.

I'm confused at the Rockies trying to get Dan Haren.

It goes against their current trend of getting crappy pitchers, ie one Mark Redmond. I could have sworn there was one more guy like that, but the name escapes me right now.

And frankly, every team should try and get a guy like O-Dawg on their roster.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.