![]() |
|
|
| |
« Send Questions To Brian Bannister | Main | Phillies Not Interested In Lohse »
With yesterday's signing of Brad Hawpe the Rockies have now locked up five young players through at least 2010 over the past 14 months. Impressive. The Denver Post says Garrett Atkins would be "the next logical candidate" for a deal, but that his situation continues to be complicated by Ian Stewart, who the Rockies are attempting to move over to second to avoid a logjam.
Naturally Matt Holliday's name came up in light of the Hawpe signing, but owner Dick Monfort tried to keep that at bay, calling the situation "a different animal, not related to these contracts."
This spring training is Stewart's third with the team. He started and played four innings at second today, but didn't have anything hit his way. He's battling Jeff Baker, Omar Quintanilla, Jayson Nix, Clint Barmes, and Marcus Giles for the starting job in what should be one of the more interesting position battles this spring. Nix may have the edge, but the team would love for Stewart to help them avoid the Atkins question altogether by making a smooth transition.
Aaron Shinsano writes for East Windup Chronicle.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e550acedcb8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Atkins, Holliday Wait For Big Payday :
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Holliday had better not get some ridiculous deal because he plays in Coors Field...
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 04, 2008 at 07:43 PM
you're right he shouldn't get a ridiculous deal for playing in Coors, he should get a ridiculous deal for being a stud.
Posted by: themfightnwords | March 04, 2008 at 09:04 PM
gogo, his agent is Satan (I mean Boras), he'll exploit the situation. If Holliday is after a big paycheck he'll be on a big market team in 2010 on a 20M+ annual contract. If he wants to have cooperstown numbers, he'll take a mild discount to remain a Colorado icon. While he is definitely a product of Coors Field as his numbers prove (last year his Slugging was 250 points higher at home), the fact of the matter is he isn't a slouch on the road. Even without Boras he's due for a payday.
As for Atkins... frankly I see them trading him next offseason, especially if they see Stewart as a viable alternative. Atkins is another Coors product. Considering the main FA 3B for 2009 are Blalock and Crede, I can see O'Dowd talking some team into giving him a couple of good prospects for Atkins (Especailly if Purpura gets a new job).
Atkins contract would be compared to Lowell's. He could probably get 13M or 14M for 5 yrs on the open market. Rockies might as well save that money with Stewart and invest in Holliday to become their next icon.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 04, 2008 at 09:10 PM
@ gogopalehose
Matt's numbers get a boost from playing at Coors, no doubt, but there's also the fact that he is a great player. You don't get the batting title from only hitting well at home. Besides, with the humidor, Coors isn't the most hitter-friendly park in the NL right now - Citi Bank Park in Philly is. More HRs, higher BA and ERA...it plays more like Wrigley with the wind blowing out, especially with short fences all around. Matt deserves a big payday, though I really hope his loyalty to the team wins out (he's a Colorado draftee and has come up through the organization) and that he'll stick around to help build a good team.
Posted by: oo_nrb | March 05, 2008 at 12:23 AM
Some team will really regret giving Holliday a $20m payday.
Regardless of how Coors ranks today as a ballpark please just look at the guys splits. He is a decent OF away from home and Babe Ruth when in Denver.
Posted by: bjsguess | March 05, 2008 at 12:40 AM
Holliday's splits are pretty dramatic, but they're evening out as he matures as a hitter. My guess is that the Rockies will wait till next offseason, then deliver a huge deal to keep him as the centerpiece.
As for Atkins start_wearing_purple might be on to something...I have to wonder if they'd even consider flipping him for a frontline starter down the stretch as early as this year. They can't keep Stewart waiting too much longer.
Posted by: Aaron Shinsano | March 05, 2008 at 01:08 AM
why is it that players and agents cant take that ballpark into the equation? if im the rockies i lock up the good pitching and get hitting from other teams, and sign the hitters long term before they start hitting at coors. we will see what happens with rowand on the giants. ill be surprised if he hits 20 homers. is it just a coincidence that the rockies and phillies have these "great" lineups and the giants and padres have these "amazing" pitching staffs? of course not.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 05, 2008 at 06:24 AM
It's not just the park, people (although it definitely helps)
Happy Holliday's splits:
1.157/.859
298 points higher at Coors.
Splits for all Rockies hitters:
.849/.727. 122 point advantage.
Bear in mind the fact that Holliday's splits are massively skewing this number. The rest of the team would have have an advantage of around 98 points. Deduct the normal home/road factor* (24 OPS point during the 2007 season for all NL teams)and this comes down to an actual park impact of 75 points for non-Holliday Rockies.
Visiting teams
.739 (vs. Rockies in their home park)/.765 (Coors)
Once again, we do need to adjust this for the normal home/road factor. A team would expect to have a negative 24 point split in a road park, so having a +26 means the actual park impact was a +50.
Holliday's split difference even dwarfs those of Tulowitzki (+240) and Atkins (+163).
What does this tell us? Holliday is a craftsman who has tailored his game to the park more so than other players - and would likely be able to do this in other parks as well. I'm not suggesting that he would put up a 1.157 OPS in another park, but I am suggesting that he would have a massive home/road split in a neutral park.
* Regarding the "normal home/road factor" - the average NL team posted an OPS 24 points higher at home than on the road. If home/road splits were all about the park impacts, we would expect this to be 0. This 24 point home advantage is likely due to a combination of factors: home well a player is tailored to the park (although you would think most teams would try to get players well suited to their park), being more rested at home (traveling during road trips can take a toll), being at home with wife and kids, adrenaline from playing in front of a home crowd, etc.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | March 05, 2008 at 07:51 AM
As for Stewart- he's just 22 (he turns 23 in April). Another year (or even two) of seasoning in AAA would probably be good for him.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | March 05, 2008 at 07:55 AM
I'm thinking any Holliday deal would have to be heavily back loaded and have a big signing bonus.
Let's say hypothetically Holliday agrees to an 18M annual contract, which is a low estimate. They'll be paying 70Mish for Holliday, Helton, Cook, Tulo, Corpas, Hawpe, and Francis (assuming they exercise Hawpe's and Francis's options). They haven't had that kind of payroll since 2001.
The Rockies are making smart moves now, but they're going to need a lot more money to pull this off.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 05, 2008 at 08:38 AM
I assume you're using 2011 salaries, since Helton drops off at that point (unless the Rockies excercise that enormous option)
It's quite likely that Helton (or Atkins) will be traded at some point in the future, which would free up some cash.
Also, a lot of key guys would be in their cheap years - guys like Iannetta, Fowler, Weathers, Jimenez, Morales, Nix, Stewart, Nelson. That would help keep the total labor cost somewhat manageable.
If the Rocks can keep things rolling (and see an attendance boost) there should also be increasing revenue as the young guys move through their peak years.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | March 05, 2008 at 09:09 AM
Yes I used Cot's contracts. And Helton's option is 2012, in 2011 he gets a raise to 19.1M
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | March 05, 2008 at 09:56 AM
kosmo i dont understand that logic. he may play better at home than on the road if the parks were equal but to say he would turn petco or whatever the giants stadium is called into his own coors field would be crazy. im not saying he isnt a very good player. he is big, strong, talented, and a gamer. its just that hes not elite. hes not arod or pujols. the thing is thats the kind of money hes going to get. lets see what texiera does this year in atlanta. very similar player. i know he played outstanding when he got there last year(better than in texas) but i dont see him putting up numbers like he did a few years ago. those numbers he put up in texas made him look like a superstar. hes just a very very good player, like holliday.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 05, 2008 at 10:42 AM
on a different note is helton really signed through 2011? bet they wish they had that one back. he cant even put the numbers up in coors anymore. i will say it once again. the rockies should lock up their own pitching and then get hitters under big contracts before they start playing in the thin air. jeff francis is a stud and they got a great deal on him because his numbers are inflated because of the field. that guy can really pitch. they need to let their hitters walk because they will automatically be overvalued.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 05, 2008 at 10:47 AM
Yeah, I meant that Helton dropped off AFTER the 2011 season because of the 2012 option. There's no way on earth that the excercise the 23M option for 2012.
My thought would be to put Stewart at 3B when he is ready (2009 or possible 2010), move Atkins to 1B, and trade Helton (at that point, he would have less time remaining on his contract, and it might be easier to trade him). Of course, the Monforts rarely call me to ask for advice.
COT's site is awesome.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | March 05, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Joel - I never said that Holliday would turn another park into his own Coors Field. In fact, I said that he would NOT duplicate his Coors numbers (1.157) there. Not did I say that he was in the class of A-Rod or Pujols.
However, I do think he would have a .950-1.000 OPS in a neutral park. Add that to his .859 road split, and you have a .900 - .930 OPS guy.
And, for whatever reason, Holliday does dominate at Coors. For 81 games a year, he puts the Rockies on his back - his home stats are MUCH better than anyone else on the team. If he can help us win a very good percentage of games at home, that puts us closer to a playoff berth.
Will we have to overpay for Holliday? Yeah, probably. But I still like it better than the alternative of letting him walk.
Yeah, Helton's deal looks worse every year. It was signed at a time of escalating salaries, and Helton's back woes (and age) have seriously sapped his strength.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | March 05, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Adding 150 to your OPS for just a familiarity factor is a little high (difference between 850 OPS and 1000 OPS).
Why not use the league average adjustments that you cited earlier of +50? That would put him at 850/900 for an average of 875.
Nothing wrong with that but we aren't looking at a $20m/year contract either. An 875 OPS would land you $10-15m/year in today's market.
Posted by: bjsguess | March 05, 2008 at 11:24 AM
24 is actually the league average differential, 50 is a Coors thing. Why not add this to the .859? Because I think Holliday is considerably better than average at tailoring his game to his park - as evidenced by his splits.
What other explanation is there for the fact that he has a +297 during the last 3 years, whereas another right handed power hitter (Atkins) has a +156? I mention Atkins because he's a righty, and thus the park should impact them similarly. If you want to throw lefties into the mix, Helton has a +177 and Hawpe a +187.
I think he would have a considerably better home/road differential than other players on his team, regardless of park.
Posted by: kosmo @ www.ObservingCasually.com | March 05, 2008 at 11:49 AM