![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rangers Leaning Toward College Pitcher In Draft | Main | Free Agent Stock Watch: Ryan Dempster »
Time to round up some links.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e5523d16198833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Odds and Ends: Wilder, Vlad, Jose Reyes:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I didn't know that Pujols was younger than Utley. Both are fantastic players anyway. If Vlad had been paired with Bonds on the Giants, they would have been the Bash Brothers of the NL. If Vlad had hit behind Bonds, then Barry may have even more homers because teams would have possibly pitcher to Barry more so that Vlad wouldn't have a runner on everytime when he stepped to the plate. Vice versa, if Vlad had hit in front of Barry, Vlad could have more homeruns because he would probably have more pitches to hit.
Posted by: JP | May 19, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"I did a Q&A recently. I forgot, at the time, that Albert Pujols is actually younger than Chase Utley."
As far as we know. There have been rumors for years that Pujols is far older than he says.
Posted by: MikeMeyer | May 19, 2008 at 11:35 AM
Joel sherman is an idiot. He should think about this season or maybe even think ahead to this offseason, but the 2011 offseason is way to far in advance to worry about.
Posted by: SkiBolton | May 19, 2008 at 11:40 AM
If Vlad had hit behind Bonds, then Barry may have even more homers because teams would have possibly pitcher to Barry more so that Vlad wouldn't have a runner on everytime when he stepped to the plate. Vice versa, if Vlad had hit in front of Barry, Vlad could have more homeruns because he would probably have more pitches to hit.
Posted by: JP | May 19, 2008 at 10:57 AM
And thank you, JP, for the wonderful insight on protection in a lineup. Now will someone explain a lefty- lefty matchup to me??
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | May 19, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Is that you, Mr. Littlefield?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | May 19, 2008 at 01:08 PM
Vlad, given his style, would have been best suited to bat behind Bonds, not in front of him. That pitchers would be scared out of their mind that a walk to Bonds would mean getting their best pitch whacked by a crazy Vlad swing would mean Bonds would get many more pitches to hit.
Even more interesting, at least to a Dodger fan, would be Vlad in Dodger Blue. Matt Kemp was already in the system when Vlad was signed, so it would have meant that Kemp stayed at his natural position of centerfield. It would have also meant no J.D. Drew/Juan Pierre debacle, especially if the Dodgers had made the same move to pick up Andre Ethier. Actually, if you think about the way each player compares, the Dodgers outfield might look a lot like a younger version of today's Angel outfield if Vlad had joined the Dodgers
Posted by: AA | May 19, 2008 at 02:02 PM
With the lefty,lefty matchup, it is a believed thougt in baseball that a lefty hitter will have a more difficult time hitting against a left-handed pitcher. As you can tell, that sometimes work and sometimes doesn't but it is just a collective baseball thought.
Posted by: JP | May 19, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I seriously doubt Pujols is as young as he claims.
Posted by: icedrake523 | May 19, 2008 at 05:29 PM
Pujols did go to college, so that means he had to provide at least some credible documentation on his age.
Posted by: grimace455 | May 19, 2008 at 07:04 PM
Not only did Pujols go to a community college, he went to a US high school and immigrated with the rest of his family. There are undoubtedly many confirmed records of his age.
Posted by: AA | May 19, 2008 at 07:14 PM
I just spent 20 minutes looking for an article that Rob Neyer wrote for ESPN Insider that basically said the idea of lineup protection is basically a myth. I couldn't find it so I can't point the people who might think the idea crazy to it but if you google neyer lineup protection there seems to be some circumstantial evidence it exists.
I'm not saying that the Giants wouldn't have been better with Vlad, but I don't think you'd be seeing any significant difference in their HR totals. Maybe the 5 hitter gets a bump in RBIs but that's probably about it.
Posted by: benjoua | May 19, 2008 at 07:51 PM
Didn't read the Neyer article, but this topic was covered at length in The Baseball Economist. The author, who agrees with Neyer, gave a ton of statistical analysis that showed that lineup protection actually resulted in a (minor) increase in strikeouts and decrease in slugging pct. He wrote that although you'd think that lineup protection would give you better pitches to hit, it actually just makes the pitcher concentrate more and use maximum effort, as opposed to when facing the bottom of the order and such. The only benefit of lineup protection in itself is getting the pitcher tired faster.
Posted by: Vismund | May 19, 2008 at 10:06 PM
Thanks Vismund, you're right. Neyer didn't write the article, he linked to the article that you mentioned.
Posted by: benjoua | May 20, 2008 at 01:36 AM
What are the chances that Jose Reyes gets traded?
He's being vilified in New York, ever since his slump last year, and the Mets lack many real trade options if they want to improve the team.
I'm not saying they'd give him away; I'm just saying it's not inconceivable that he could be moved. For example, the Dodgers might give up Hu, Elbert and Meloan after the season, with Furcal headed to free agency. Maybe the Rays would give up Kazmir, Bartlett and Jaso?
Posted by: Devlsh | May 20, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Pujols did go to college, so that means he had to provide at least some credible documentation on his age.
Posted by: grimace455 | May 19, 2008 at 07:04 PM
Not only did Pujols go to a community college, he went to a US high school and immigrated with the rest of his family. There are undoubtedly many confirmed records of his age.
Posted by: AA | May 19, 2008 at 07:14 PM
Yeah, and Tejada had every kind of identification that every other U.S. citizen has, and they all had his correct age. Evidently none of the management teams of the A's, Orioles or Astros had any interest in consulting, say, his driver's license.
Not saying the situations are analogous, but just because a guy has legit papers, went to school etc. doesn't mean his "baseball age" is his real age.
Posted by: asm | May 20, 2008 at 03:12 PM