![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Heyman, Vidro, Glavine, Falkenborg | Main | Stark's Latest: Manny, Fuentes, Livan, Dunn »
According to Sportsnet.ca, the Blue Jays have placed Vernon Wells and John McDonald on waivers. Keep in mind that many players on placed on waivers every year even when the team has no intent of making a trade.
Wells stands a good chance of clearing waivers, though a trade is unlikely. He has a complicated, massive backloaded contract. From 2009-14 he will earn $100MM in salary, plus another $17MM as part of his signing bonus. He has a full no-trade clause and opt-out clause after '11.
McDonald, a defensive whiz at shortstop, is signed for '09 at $1.9MM. He probably will be claimed.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55400e7818834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vernon Wells, John McDonald Placed On Waivers:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Perhaps this is how the Dodgers will finally get McDonald, though I don't think they necessarily need him when Berroa essentially gives you the same thing and can actually hit the baseball from time to time.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Wells has 117 million and 6 years left on his contract. If they could eat 39 million and send him away, I would do it. If you think about it, the Jays only paid him $9 million for this year. Yes that would be like paying him $49 million for one year, but the AAV was really $18 million, meaning the loss would only be $31 million, spread over 6 years, which is about $5 million a year. Plus, if they get a decent prospect back, that might give you similar value in talent:dollars anyway. Is it feasible? Maybe, because the trading team would be getting Vernon for 6/78, which is $13 million a year. Vernon probably still has a reputation as a good defensive CF and his bat hasn't been bad this year, at 290/330/457, with injuries. Compared to the Rowand contract, which seems pretty reasonable, I'm sure some team would bite. He'd also have to waive his opt out clause probably.
The reason I'd do this is because in my opinion, this team needs to blow itself up, and every other piece is pretty easily moveable except for Vernon. He is turning 30 next year and I think he'll be an okay player the next few years but hardly great. May as well sell high and let someone else have him for age 34-35. It'd be a smart sunk cost, and Alex Rios could take over in centre. OF is not a big problem.
Posted by: Guitar Hero | August 14, 2008 at 01:07 PM
I REALLY hope the Yanks claimed Vernon. I was joking yesterday when I said Melky for Wells. Maybe I'm more of a fortuneteller than I thought LOL.
Posted by: maximumpotential | August 14, 2008 at 01:14 PM
What are the chances Boston places a claim on McDonald? God knows he's a better SS than Lugo. But with the recent emergence of Lowrie, would Boston dare make such a move?
Posted by: bamabosoxfan | August 14, 2008 at 01:20 PM
What is the point of placing a player on waivers if a team does not intend to trade that player? Is it strictly a salary dump attempt?
Posted by: Dan Stabbingworth | August 14, 2008 at 01:23 PM
ibanez for wells
jk
Posted by: juiced | August 14, 2008 at 01:24 PM
I would be suprised to see McDonald last long enough to get to the Yankees, Red Sox and Dodgers. I would hope to see the Orioles all over this guy to end our revolving door at the position. $3m for next season isn't a lot, and it would provide us a stopgap and buy time to find a better, long-term option.
Posted by: dorfmac | August 14, 2008 at 02:23 PM
I take that back. Nevermind. I knew he was lame with the bat, but I didn't realize that he was ABSOLUTE garbage. OPS+ of 51 - I was expecting something at least in the 70s. B-R-U-T-A-L
Posted by: dorfmac | August 14, 2008 at 02:35 PM
Best defensive SS in baseball, though.
Posted by: stoeten | August 14, 2008 at 03:14 PM
“Perhaps this is how the Dodgers will finally get McDonald, though I don't think they necessarily need him when Berroa essentially gives you the same thing and can actually hit the baseball from time to time.”
…Hahaha… Did I just read “Berroa” and “hit” in the same sentence ~ a sentence that didn’t include the work “cant” and phrase “worth a sh!t”?
Anyway, MacDonald is infinitely better than Berroa; he doesn’t hit quite as crappy, he actually has a little bit of speed/baserunning-smarts, and he is one of the best fielders you will find at the position. Berroa offers absolutely nothing, he’s a stop-gap with no actual skills at all…
“What is the point of placing a player on waivers if a team does not intend to trade that player? Is it strictly a salary dump attempt?”
…No, basically everyone gets put on waivers around this time ~ we just normally don’t hear about too many of them. It’s a great was to get a gauge of interest for players you might actually want to move. Its also one of those where the more names hitting the wire means the possibility that teams miss the player you are actually trying to pass through and work a trade for. If the Jays have been contacted about MacDonald for instance, they would want to try to get him to clear waivers or atleast make it all the way to that interested team ~ flood the wire with names and maybe a guy on the list slips past. Cant imagine it works very often, but why not try… There is most likely a hundred or so names on the wires right now though, really almost everyone gets put on it in the first week or two after the deadline...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | August 14, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Vernon Wells to The Bronx!?
Posted by: maximumpotential | August 14, 2008 at 03:41 PM
"Best defensive SS in baseball, though."
Um, no. McDonald is an excellent defender, but he is definately not better than Cabrera, Furcal, Aybar, Maicer Izturis, Young or Greene.
"…Hahaha… Did I just read “Berroa” and “hit” in the same sentence ~ a sentence that didn’t include the work “cant” and phrase “worth a sh!t”?"
At least Berroa has some pop in his bat, which McDonald definately doesn't. Their speed is a wash and Berroa has actually out performed McDonald on defense this year.
"Berroa offers absolutely nothing, he’s a stop-gap with no actual skills at all…"
I guess that 4.74 RF9 means no actual skills then? Or all the excellent throws and heads up defensive plays.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 05:23 PM
maximumpotential-
Not gonna happen. Putting a guy on waivers means precisely...nothing.
dorfmac-
You were right the first time. He ain't getting by the O's...or going there. I'd be shocked if the Birds didn't claim him (if he even gets to them) and even more shocked if the Jays didn't pull him back immediately (unless B'more offered something of value, which is doubtful, given his bat).
Much ado about nothing.
Posted by: milehigh78 | August 14, 2008 at 05:50 PM
AA: "Um, no. McDonald is an excellent defender, but he is definately not better than Cabrera, Furcal, Aybar, Maicer Izturis, Young or Greene"
McDonald's range and arm strength is probably equally or greater then all of those SS.
He is something special in the field.
Too bad that when he enters games the opposing teams pull their outfield in.
Posted by: achengy | August 14, 2008 at 06:33 PM
What's the rule on waiver claims if he has a no-trade clause?
Potentially could the Bluejays just dump him on whoever claims him (in that unlikely event) without asking for anybody?
That's not technically a trade so the clause couldn't be invoked or am I wrong?
Posted by: Remy | August 14, 2008 at 07:07 PM
"McDonald's range and arm strength is probably equally or greater then all of those SS."
Stronger arm than Furcal or Aybar? I don't think so.
Like I said, McDonald is an excellent defensive player, but he is most definately not the best in all of baseball.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 07:08 PM
("Best defensive SS in baseball, though.")
“Um, no. McDonald is an excellent defender, but he is definately not better than Cabrera, Furcal, Aybar, Maicer Izturis, Young or Greene.”
…Have you ever watched a single team other than the Angels, Dodgers or Padres? Every comment you have seems to somehow include something along the lines of “__so&so__ Dodger/Angel is actually the best…”.
("…Hahaha… Did I just read “Berroa” and “hit” in the same sentence ~ a sentence that didn’t include the work “cant” and phrase “worth a sh!t”?")
“At least Berroa has some pop in his bat, which McDonald definately doesn't. Their speed is a wash and Berroa has actually out performed McDonald on defense this year.”
…Ahh yes, that .264 SLG screams “pop in his bat”. And the .314 SLG (640 AB) he has posted over the last three years is soooo much better than the .317 SLG (690 AB) MacDonald sports over the same time. MacDonald “definately" doesn’t come close to the kind of “pop” Berroa brings to a club ~ youre right…
Also, MacDonald has played only 40 games this year because of his early season injury. Otherwise, he kicks the crap out of Berroa with the glove. And no, Berroa has no speed and is statistically a miserable baserunner. But hey, he’s a Dodger so he must somehow be the best, right?
("Berroa offers absolutely nothing, he’s a stop-gap with no actual skills at all…")
“I guess that 4.74 RF9 means no actual skills then? Or all the excellent throws and heads up defensive plays.”
Uhhh, RF9 is factored by dividing Assists + PutOuts by the number of games played. It has next to no barring on true ability, and is dependant on your situations. But hey, you found a random unimportant stat which you want to act like somehow means a Dodger player is better than he is ~ surprise, surprise…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | August 14, 2008 at 07:15 PM
"…Have you ever watched a single team other than the Angels, Dodgers or Padres? Every comment you have seems to somehow include something along the lines of “__so&so__ Dodger/Angel is actually the best…”."
I watch plenty of other teams. Naturally, living where I do I will watch more of the Dodgers and Angels. I'm not going to say that Casey Blake is better than A-Rod and I am not going to say that Jeff Kent is better than Brandon Phillips, but examples are going to come to mind more quickly for the guys I see play more than 100 games a year on TV or in person than players I see less often. Also, notice I included a, gasp, Texas Ranger and a, gasp, Chicago White Sox? But hey, you hate the L.A. teams, I get it.
"…Ahh yes, that .264 SLG screams “pop in his bat”. And the .314 SLG (640 AB) he has posted over the last three years is soooo much better than the .317 SLG (690 AB) MacDonald sports over the same time. MacDonald “definately" doesn’t come close to the kind of “pop” Berroa brings to a club ~ youre right…"
Um, I can't even believe you are trying this. McDonald has never hit more than 3 HR in his MLB career and not more than 5 in his professional career (in High A). Meanwhile, Berroa has hit double digit homers in 2 MLB seasons and had hit 10 in 51 games at AAA this year before the trade.
"Also, MacDonald has played only 40 games this year because of his early season injury. Otherwise, he kicks the crap out of Berroa with the glove. And no, Berroa has no speed and is statistically a miserable baserunner. But hey, he’s a Dodger so he must somehow be the best, right?"
No speed for Berroa? Funny, the guy I am looking at has stolen 21 and 14 in separate MLB seasons, along with having 5 or more triples 3 times, while McDonald has never stolen more than 7 bases. Further, while I stated numerous times that McDonald is an excellent fielder, his RF numbers this year are lower than all of those players. I even agree with you that McDonald is a better defensive player than Berroa, who has played excellent defense this year and in his career.
"Uhhh, RF9 is factored by dividing Assists + PutOuts by the number of games played. It has next to no barring on true ability, and is dependant on your situations. But hey, you found a random unimportant stat which you want to act like somehow means a Dodger player is better than he is ~ surprise, surprise…"
Wait, wait. Are you eschewing a sabermetric stat? How are you ever going to defend you Adam Dunn obsession now?
Further, you got the equation wrong. A + PO/G is the Range Factor equation. 9(A + PO/I) is the equation for Range Factor 9 Innings and is much better for determining the value for part time players like Berroa and McDonald. Also, while I think all RF equations are less valuable for positions like 1B and C that rely on others for PO numbers and skew based on the type of pitching staff, range factor IS a good tool for measuring the ability of the middle infield and 3B.
As for Berroa generally, of course I would rather have a ton of other people starting at short for the Dodgers. I wish Furcal was healthy and I wish Nomar could stay healthy, because both produce at a very high level. I would have been happy with a reasonable Jack Wilson or Orlando Cabrera trade. I would take just about every regular starting SS in the league over Berroa. Hell, I would take Julio Lugo back if the Red Sox paid his contract, but I wouldn't take McDonald when he would A) cost more and B) add nothing, except a little better defense.
Posted by: AA | August 14, 2008 at 08:10 PM
AA: "Um, no. McDonald is an excellent defender, but he is definately not better than Cabrera, Furcal, Aybar, Maicer Izturis, Young or Greene"
Defensively, Johnny Mac is better than all those SSs except maybe Cabrera. Furcal has a stronger arm but is not a better fielder.
His offense is obviously a lot worse than those SSs though. Compared to Berroa, well, Berroa has been absolute crap the last 3 years or so... McDonald hasn't been any better, but his defence shits on Berroa's.
Posted by: TheMainEvent | August 14, 2008 at 08:13 PM
I can't see why putting these guys like Wells, Sheffield, etc, on waivers is such a big deal? On August 1st, you basically put your roster through waivers at some point, trying to get certain players past to be able to trade them. That's all these teams do this time of year. They're just creating trade options if certain players go through. Will Toronto dump Wells on somebody if he's claimed? Not likely, but that is a huge contract, so the claiming team doesn't know if they may get stuck with a contract, so that's the gamble on putting in a claim on a guy like Wells.
Posted by: melmann | August 14, 2008 at 08:30 PM
“But hey, you hate the L.A. teams, I get it.”
…Hahaha, yeah man ~ you just give “Homer-Town Homer-ism” new meaning, I just point out the errors in your statements. If there is a post you will almost certainly try to talk up a player on the Angels or Dodgers ~ its like clockwork. Oh, and BTW ~ I root for the Dodgers and do hate the Angles, but that doesn’t mean I cant look at things realistically…
“Um, I can't even believe you are trying this. McDonald has never hit more than 3 HR in his MLB career and not more than 5 in his professional career (in High A). Meanwhile, Berroa has hit double digit homers in 2 MLB seasons and had hit 10 in 51 games at AAA this year before the trade.”
…Trying to do what? Here, please explain to me where Berroa has more pop in his bat at this time. Here are the numbers once more:
Berroa ~ 640 AB, .314 SLG
Johnny ~ 690 AB, .317 SLG
…Give me all the AAA HR numbers you want, run off the distant past till youre blue in the face ~ the fact still remains that Berroa hasn’t shown anything even remotely resembling “pop” over the last three years in the majors…
“No speed for Berroa? Funny, the guy I am looking at has stolen 21 and 14 in separate MLB seasons, along with having 5 or more triples 3 times, while McDonald has never stolen more than 7 bases.”
…Again with the distant past. Berroa has stolen exactly 9 bases and been thrown out 6 times (60%) the last 3 years (between majors and minors) vs MacDonald at 17 and 6 (74%) over the same time. JohnnyMac also has 5 ML triples in those 690 AB, vs Berroa at 2 in 640 AB.
“Wait, wait. Are you eschewing a sabermetric stat? How are you ever going to defend you Adam Dunn obsession now? Further, you got the equation wrong. A + PO/G is the Range Factor equation. 9(A + PO/I) is the equation for Range Factor 9 Innings and is much better for determining the value for part time players like Berroa and McDonald.”
…Huh? First ~ your Dunn obsession, you decide to try to attack him over stuff you make up. Second, its not a sabermetric stat ~ well, not a real one. Third ~ uhh, oh, you mean I made a typo? Forth ~ the only correct and important thing in that entire sentence is “part time players”. “Part-Time players” have an uneven number of opportunities, making RF9 or RFg completely unreliable as a whole. Hence the reason I said that it was completely dependant on situations and worthless when trying to gague Berroa…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | August 14, 2008 at 09:09 PM