« Offseason Outlook: Baltimore Orioles |
Main
| J.P. Ricciardi - GM Trade History »
By Tim Dierkes [September 4, 2008 at 1:36pm CST]
Once again we turn to Eddie Bajek at Detroit Tigers Thoughts, who has cracked the Elias formula. Today, National League starters have been added. Thoughts:
- Four starters project to have Type A status: C.C. Sabathia, Kyle Lohse, Ben Sheets, and Oliver Perez. Lohse and Perez are solid pitchers, but they're less attractive given the loss of a draft pick. Teams like the Mets, Astros, Cardinals, and Yankees may be searching for starting pitching and may have unprotected first-round picks to lose.
- Type Bs: Randy Wolf, Randy Johnson, Derek Lowe, Brad Penny, Jamie Moyer, John Smoltz, and Greg Maddux. You have to like Lowe not costing a draft pick.
- Odalis Perez, Braden Looper, Livan Hernandez, Tom Glavine, Pedro Martinez, and others you'd expect are not Type A or B. No one loses a pick, no one gains a pick.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e554fe07a38834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Elias Ranking Update: NL Starters:
Wow. That Lowe is a Type B and
Lohse is a Type A shows some serious weakness in this formula. That said, you would think such a ranking makes the Dodgers more likely to make a significant push at him, particularly if Penny isn't right.
Posted by: AA | September 04, 2008 at 01:41 PM
So does that mean the Brewers will get 4 first round draft picks next June?
Posted by: Lidocaine | September 04, 2008 at 01:59 PM
How in God is Smoltz a type anything?
Posted by: Land-Man | September 04, 2008 at 01:59 PM
If the draft order were to be made now the Braves would be 6th; given how awful they have been since the break, I think their pick is all but a lock to be protected. The Dodgers are 15th; it isn't out of the realm of possibility that the winner of the NL West has a protected pick this offseason.
Posted by: baleen | September 04, 2008 at 02:04 PM
"So does that mean the Brewers will get 4 first round draft picks next June?"
Yes. Plus their own pick, would give them 5 overall. Melvin must be licking his chops. 5 top 40 picks has got to be sweet compensation for losing your 2 stud pitchers.
Posted by: nrmax88 | September 04, 2008 at 02:06 PM
"How in God is Smoltz a type anything?"
If I'm not mistaken the Type A/B system takes into account the previous two years, and Smoltz was had a great year last year and was an allstar and 6th in the Cy Young voting. He was good when he pitched this year too, albeit it being for a very short time.
Posted by: John Difford | September 04, 2008 at 02:16 PM
Bet the Astros are thrilled with this. They can conceivably sign Sheets and Lowe or Garland and only lose one pick. And they'll get at least one pick back when Wolf leaves, and maybe two if Wolf continues to pitch well and bumps himself up to Type A status (he's right on the A/B cusp).
Posted by: ARusonis | September 04, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I think the Astros will make a big push to resign Wolf. He seems well respected in the clubhouse and has been pretty good with them.
I also think they'll go hard after Garland. Not that I particularly agree with them doing either, that's just the feeling I get.
Posted by: Darin | September 04, 2008 at 02:43 PM
"Teams like the Dodgers, Tigers, Orioles, and Braves may be searching for starting pitching and may have unprotected first-round picks to lose. "
Much more importantly(to me anyway), the MFY are searching for starting pitching and have an unprotected first-round pick to lose.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | September 04, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Dempster is a type A too if I'm correct...but will be judged as a reliever. His innings pitched and strikeouts are going to pretty much blow all NL relievers away considering his numbers...
Dempster being judged stricktly as a reliever is what I would consider a flaw in this system as well.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | September 04, 2008 at 03:29 PM
What if a team with a top 15 pick signs two type-As?
Posted by: ballerwhiteboy | September 04, 2008 at 03:39 PM
I can't believe Jon Garland isn't a type B. That trade looks very good for the White Sox now. They get two high picks, money to sign Scott Linebrink with, and 1 year of Orlando Cabrera for 1 year of Jon Garland.
Posted by: Joe | September 04, 2008 at 03:43 PM
I'll say it again ... this ranking system is absolutely awful. How in the world did the powers that be agree to this? There is no rhyme or reason rooted in rational thought behind the rankings.
Posted by: bjsguess | September 04, 2008 at 04:09 PM
@ Joe
Garland is a Type B. The Angels will get draft compensation for him (assuming they offer arbitration which I expect that they will).
And while Garland has not performed as well as hoped - the Angels certainly needed Garland more than they needed Cabrera. Aybar and Izturis have played as well, if not better, than Cabrera. Garland has taken the ball every 5th day and put up his typical LA performances. My only gripe with the guy is that he earns about $5m too much.
Posted by: bjsguess | September 04, 2008 at 04:14 PM
"Teams like the Dodgers, Tigers, Orioles, and Braves may be searching for starting pitching and may have unprotected first-round picks to lose. "
With this sentence I looked at the opposite teams compared to what I intended. I am going to fix it.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | September 04, 2008 at 04:16 PM
"Yes. Plus their own pick, would give them 5 overall. Melvin must be licking his chops. 5 top 40 picks has got to be sweet compensation for losing your 2 stud pitchers."
Yeah... but that means they'd be in rebuilding mode again.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | September 04, 2008 at 04:27 PM
The Smoltz comments:
a) The rankings count the past 2 years, and he was really good last year.
b) They pad your stats to account for time on the DL. No idea what the adjustment is.
To get an idea on how significant the DL adjustments are: Carl Pavano is ranked higher than about 25-30 other pitchers. Granted none of the names below him would impress you but we're talking about a guy with a total of 22 innings pitched over 4 starts during the time period analyzed.
Posted by: yanksfan | September 04, 2008 at 05:04 PM
"And while Garland has not performed as well as hoped - the Angels certainly needed Garland more than they needed Cabrera. Aybar and Izturis have played as well, if not better, than Cabrera."
Aybar and Izzy have not performed like Cabrera did with the bat last year. Some of that is due to a lot of bad luck for Izzy early in the season, but remember that last year was Cabrera's best ever with the stick.
As for Garland, I think you are a little off in your evaluation. He has performed almost exactly as expected. His ERA has been a bit high considering he went to a much more friendly park, but he has put up consistently decent starts, with a few gems and a few stinkers mixed in, and has benefited from run support probably more than any other Angel starter. That said, I have a feeling the Angels knew Escobar was iffy at best for this year and made that move because of it. Lackey's injury was unsuspected, but so was Saunders' emergence (they always expected Santana to be this good).
Posted by: AA | September 04, 2008 at 05:19 PM
It would be awesome to see the Astros sign Sheets and the lowe/garland and only lose one pick and could possibly land a sandwich pick or even a 1st rounder if Wolf gets to type A. Does anyone know what he would have to finish with to become a type A? I really think they are going to try to resign him, especially after the games he has pitched lately, but if they don't that will be nice to add that extra pick. They are 7-1 in his starts and pitched a gem last night.
But I was looking at the formula and it takes into account W and win loss percentage. What happens to a stud pitcher that has a bad record because of his team. I don't know if it would matter that much, but a pitcher like Matt Cain could very well be a type A with some more W's, but I am not sure. He just seems like too good a pitcher to be considered a type B
Posted by: H-Town-Baller | September 04, 2008 at 05:47 PM
"That said, I have a feeling the Angels knew Escobar was iffy at best for this year and made that move because of it."
I dont believe the Angels knew about Escobar. They had the trade with the Marlins for Cabrera fall through many times at the last sec because of the Marlins GM. The Angels would have traded Santana or Saunders because they thought they had 6 starters for the season. It's a good thing the trade didnt happen because then the Angels would have been short 2 starters for the 1st month and down 1 starter the rest of the year.
Posted by: #1 Angels Fan | September 04, 2008 at 06:04 PM
AA - I was comparing the results of 2008 between Aybar/Izturis vs Cabrera. In addition to costing a fraction of Cabrera the Angels were able to break in Aybar and not miss a beat. Cabrera in 2007 was a better offensive player but as you pointed out, that was out of the ordinary. As an Angel he has consistently averaged a 700-720 OPS avg.
2008 Izturis - 691 OPS
2008 Aybar - 700 OPS
2008 O Cabrera - 690 OPS
My larger point was that Cabrera was replaceable. Meanwhile, the Angels would not have replaced Garland's contribution. Adenhart wasn't ready. They would have been forced to take on some reclamation project with who knows what kind of results or overpaid through an early season trade.
Finally, Garland is a mild disappointment. Playing in front of a much improved defense and shifting away from Chicago should have shaved close to half a run off his ERA. Instead his ERA has risen almost half a run compared to last year. Unless things turn around he will be a complete non-factor in the post-season. He served his purpose, I'm just slightly disappointed his performance wasn't better.
Posted by: bjsguess | September 04, 2008 at 09:11 PM
C.C. Sabathia, Kyle Lohse, Ben Sheets, and Oliver Perez.
Who are four people who have never been in my kitchen?
Posted by: scatterbrian | September 04, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Article on ESPN about the Brewers owner acknowledging Sabathia has a big payday coming. He doesn't say anything one way or another if the Brewers will try to keep him, but it is at least interesting to note his commitment to senior leadership. Not counting raises, the Brewers have $20M+ coming off the books next season from Sheets and Gagne. If they trade away Fielder it's not inconceivable they're heavy players for CC.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | September 04, 2008 at 09:27 PM
As I understand it, a team that signs 3 type A free agents loses it's own 1st round pick, 2nd round pick, and 3rd round pick, in that order.
If they gain picks due to the departure of their own free agents, those picks are protected and are not forfeited to another team.
Is that accurate? Wouldn't seem to make much sense then to sign only one type A and lost the 1st rounder, and not go ahead and sign two more since they only cost a 2nd and a 3rd pick.
Posted by: dproc0219 | September 04, 2008 at 09:54 PM
"Yeah... but that means they'd be in rebuilding mode again. "
They will be, they should also unload Prince for a ****load of talent if they can get it. He's not going to sign long term.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | September 04, 2008 at 10:31 PM
rays-brewers
how about prince+ for bj upton and matt garza?
Posted by: crash | September 04, 2008 at 11:58 PM
"They should try to trade prince for a young pitching prospect with upside in the way that hamilton netted edinson volquez."
Fielder would net a larger catch than Hamilton. I like the idea of Cain for Fielder even if it's a fans rumor. A deal that makes a lot of sense for both teams and I think the Brew crew would probably get another piece with the deal. But imagine if they get Cain and resign CC. CC/Cain/Gallardo has the markings of good times.
"how about prince+ for bj upton and matt garza?"
Not worth it for the Rays. Garza and the strength of the starters is one of the biggest reasons for the Rays season. If the Rays make a trade using pitching they should use their farm, they still have a scary amount of talent down there not named David Price.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | September 05, 2008 at 12:10 AM
swp
valid. but i'm thinking almost straight-up 2-for-2. rays move price into either rotation or pen, finally give niemann a chance (he has less value now than he did). doubt, brews would want young mlb-ready and rays still have davis/mcgee, even mitch talbot to look at. think of the deal this way: delmon young for the (non-purple) prince. yeah, cf might be an issue (rocco's health?) but gotta admit that a 3-4-5-6 combo of crawford-fielder-longoria-pena has major mash potential!
if i was the sfg's, i'd want more than just prince for cain, but i'd look at that deal, too
Posted by: crash | September 05, 2008 at 04:27 AM
Well the Rays do need to step up the hitting if they fail to win the big one. There in the bottom half of runs scored and average for the American League. And there aren't exactly a plethora of cheap young run producers. But they'd be better off replacing Jackson in the rotation.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | September 05, 2008 at 05:03 AM
I cant believe Bronson Arroyo would be a Type A...
Posted by: cincy_11 | September 05, 2008 at 07:08 AM
Tim, I'm fairly certain that Boras made it a stipulation before signing with St. Louis that the Cardinals NOT offer arbitration to Lohse.
Posted by: Devlsh | September 05, 2008 at 11:48 AM
"Tim, I'm fairly certain that Boras made it a stipulation before signing with St. Louis that the Cardinals NOT offer arbitration to Lohse."
I doubt they would have done that.
"I cant believe Bronson Arroyo would be a Type A..."
If 2006 counts, I can easily see it. Arroyo gives up runs on homers, but his high K/low BB numbers boost his value.
Posted by: AA | September 05, 2008 at 12:25 PM
How about Prince Fielder/JJ Hardy/Bill Hall and Dave Bush
for Tim Lincecum and prospect
Posted by: Lidocaine | September 05, 2008 at 12:31 PM
O. Perez- ERA 3.86 W-L 10-7 SO 151
D.Lowe- ERA 3.53 W-L 12-11 SO 132
Lohse- ERA 3.76 W-L 13-6 106 SO
Can someone explain to me how perez and lohse are Type A and Lowe is not? Those rankings are a joke
Posted by: jdodgers27 | September 06, 2008 at 01:51 AM
The numbers weight 2007 and 2008 equally.
Oliver Perez, through Saturday, ranks 35th in Total Games, 30th in innings, 32nd in wins, 49th in winning percentage, 23rd in ERA, and 9th in K's
Kyle Lohse ranks t15th (TG), 21st (IP), 9th (Wins), 25th (WP), 44th (ERA), and 37th (K)
Derek Lowe ranks 19th (TG), 16th (IP), t40th (W), 71st (WP), 24th (ERA), and 26th (K)
Upon further review, there is an error in the spreadsheet, and Lowe is being shorted 10 wins which is killing his winning percentage. I'll look into this and repost sometime this week.
Posted by: ebajek85 | September 07, 2008 at 11:45 PM
I have updated it. Lohse is type B and Lowe type A. I apologize for the error.
Posted by: ebajek85 | September 08, 2008 at 09:07 AM