![]() |
|
|
| |
« Odds and Ends: Ponson, Pie, Dohmann | Main | Daniel Cabrera Suitors »
2:15pm: Dan Connolly of the Baltimore Sun talked to Orioles president Andy MacPhail, who reminded that the Orioles have flexibility with their offer.
10:46am: Nick Cafardo talked to a GM for one of the five teams in the Teixeira bidding who believes the Red Sox are in the lead. So...was it Andy MacPhail, Jim Bowden, Brian Cashman, or Tony Reagins?
9:54am: According to ESPN's Buster Olney, the Orioles have not improved their initial offer to Mark Teixeira. The Red Sox, Angels, and Nationals have higher bids on the table. Olney's source believes Teixeira would have to "really, really want to play there" to take Baltimore's offer.
Based on the most recent reports, the Red Sox appear to be at eight years, the Nationals at eight years, $160MM, and Angels at eight years and at least $160MM, and the Orioles at seven years in the $140-150MM range. I'm guessing a ninth year and an opt-out clause will be two of the biggest factors when it's all said and done.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105367ac803970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mark Teixeira Rumors: Wednesday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
lol no one "really, really" want to play for the O's in their current state.
Posted by: C.K. | December 17, 2008 at 09:56 AM
If Tex "really, really" wants to play for the Orioles, maybe he should "settle" for only making $150 million in the next seven years during a period in the US where thousands of people are losing their jobs everyday. Boohoo.
Posted by: Prismo | December 17, 2008 at 09:59 AM
15K an inning, for a first baseman?
Posted by: James PLouffe | December 17, 2008 at 10:01 AM
i see don't see him signing with the red sox unfortunately. it will be all about no-trade and opt-out clauses, which the red sox will not offer...
Posted by: Mowses | December 17, 2008 at 10:04 AM
If an opt-out will be the difference maker, Theo should offer an eight year, back-loaded contract with an opt out after 4 years. If Tex opts out, at least they got his best 4 years at a "reasonable" salary and still have Lars Anderson to replace him.
Posted by: Little Bear | December 17, 2008 at 10:05 AM
If that is accruate reporting and those are the offers I seriously would not be surprised to see the Yankees jump into this now. Something like 10 years 20+ million a year with an opt out clause somewhere between seasons 3 and 5..
This opt out clause might be something we will be seeing more and more in baseball in the future.. Just a hunch.
Posted by: Pat Kelly | December 17, 2008 at 10:10 AM
quit bashing the guy for wanting more money.
EVERYONE here would switch jobs if they offered you $20 MILLION dollars more.
Posted by: mike_lee | December 17, 2008 at 10:14 AM
I bet Tex gets his 10 yr $200 mill deal he said he wanted at the beginning, and it pisses me off. Everyone knows it's a terrible business decision, and it'll get done anyway.
Posted by: KenInToront | December 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM
little bear - scott boras will see right through that
Posted by: the_kid_01 | December 17, 2008 at 10:22 AM
The Orioles aren't out of this despite what Olney says. They just want people to think they are out of this IMO...
Posted by: jtrea81 | December 17, 2008 at 10:24 AM
No one is bashing the guy...the system is the problem.
Posted by: James PLouffe | December 17, 2008 at 10:26 AM
jtrea - if they're not they should be.
they're buying a jacuzzi when they need to fix the hole in their roof
Posted by: the_kid_01 | December 17, 2008 at 10:29 AM
"they're buying a jacuzzi when they need to fix the hole in their roof"
I actually agree with you for the most part, depending on Tex's final price. But what if they have a repairman coming to fix the hole later on. Now it's possible the repairman won't succeed, but if he does, you have a good roof and a jacuzzi.
Posted by: wickedwitch | December 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM
bosox..I agree until the last sentence, its a lot better to have the "good guys" to root for and he is definitely one of them...until he puts on a Sox uniform :)
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM
James PLouffe,
No, the system is not the problem (its a free market system...same as when you're looking for a job). MLB teams make a lot of money every year because fans seem to think its worthwhile to buy tickets and watch games on TV. Those teams have a decision to just sit on their money and just rake in profits or spend it on good players to improve their teams. Based on current reports, there are at least 4 teams that think Tex is worth a 7-8 year contract worth at least 20 million a year. Maybe these teams actually know more about Tex's relative value then you do...
Posted by: nixa37 | December 17, 2008 at 10:37 AM
No one is bashing the guy...the system is the problem.
Posted by: James PLouffe | December 17, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Is the system the problem or is Scott Boras the problem? This is the same agent who proposed a 4 year / $50 million deal for a 36 year old offensively challenged Jason Varitek. This is the same agent who compared Oliver Perez, at this stage in his career, to Sandy Koufax. The guy went to a two bit law school - UOP - and it shows in his unscrupulous approach to negotiations.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 10:38 AM
Scott Boras cannot be the problem unless the owners let him be. As long as there are teams willing to pay what he asks, why wouldnt he ask for the world?
Fans may see him as the problem, but in all honesty, if any of us had a son with the talent to go pro, Boras would be the first person we called. I know it would be the first person I called.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM
The Orioles have a lot of good pieces already assembled though.
Roberts (if extended), Markakis, Jones and Wieters is a darn good core, and then you add Tex.
The only weakness they have is the starting rotation and they have the trio of Chris Tillman, Jake Arrieta and Brian Matusz in the minors only a year or so away. And that's not talking about EL Pitcher of the Year Brad Bergesen or Jason Berken either.
They will have a bunch of young talented players for cheap and therefore will be able to afford Tex's contract.
Everybody who says the Orioles have a lot of holes needs to look at their entire organization. In the past couple of years, the organization has gotten a lot better very quickly.
Posted by: jtrea81 | December 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM
yet players flock to him.
he's doing his job guys. the players hire him to do for them what he did for a-rod, et al.
Posted by: the_kid_01 | December 17, 2008 at 10:43 AM
The system isn't the problem, did anyone here ever think that maybe they are just flat out wrong.
Teixeira will land whatever the free market bears. Supply and demand, people.. Remember the teachings of Adam Smith..
Posted by: scribbletone | December 17, 2008 at 10:46 AM
The worst problem with this whole misconception is that it seems as though fans want players to make less.
You want to know where that money goes if the players make less? The pockets of the billionaire owners.
I don't see why anyone would prefer for the rich to get richer.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM
if casman said it, id believe it, because that means the yankees are out
Posted by: 04Forever | December 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Which of the five GMs said it... probably the Red Sox GM?
Posted by: Ksy92003 | December 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Fans may see him (Scott Boras) as the problem, but in all honesty, if any of us had a son with the talent to go pro, Boras would be the first person we called. I know it would be the first person I called.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 10:41 AM
There's an old saying - "You're only as good as the people you associate with."
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Scott Boras is a blessing on the game of baseball he makes money, the players make money, and we get to enjoy the playoff success.
Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 10:46 AM
I'm sure Royals fans everywhere will agree with your assessment.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 10:53 AM
adam smith also believed in fair play, which this system does not employ.
Posted by: the_kid_01 | December 17, 2008 at 10:53 AM
"Which of the five GMs said it... probably the Red Sox GM?"
doubt it, theo is very coy. he doesnt like making any public statements about anything until official, very under the radar
Posted by: 04Forever | December 17, 2008 at 10:53 AM
This year it’s Tex this or Tex that, (last year it was Miggy this and Miggy that) but his value is certainly just shy of $30 million a year in A-Rod dollars (since 27.5 was then). And now that the Fed is printing dollars so that the Chinese, Japanese or even an oil baron can buy up everything, then maybe we will have the Putin Angels of Anaheim and $30 million a year won’t be too much to pay. How many rubles is that darling? Oh that's ridiculous, but the S.D. Padres are up for sale because of a divorce (or maybe Bernie Madman Maddoff?) and we could see a new franchise of the best players in baseball develop owned by Hugo Chavez and Citgo oil?
Posted by: Kristy_Joe | December 17, 2008 at 10:55 AM
It's definitely not Theo and I don't think Cashman would state that publicly.
My money is on Tony Reagins.
Posted by: SOX&Dawgs | December 17, 2008 at 10:57 AM
ksy, theo would never give that info up...
they are one of the most tight lipped organizations
Posted by: mike_lee | December 17, 2008 at 10:57 AM
Teixeira will land whatever the free market bears. Supply and demand, people.. Remember the teachings of Adam Smith..
Posted by: scribbletone | December 17, 2008 at 10:46 AM
And free markets have proven so efficient that they've apparently resulted in a second Great Depression within a span of 80 years. Let's hear it for deregulation of markets!
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 10:58 AM
midtown, what team do you follow?
Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 10:54 AM
I follow a few teams, including the Athletics, the Red Sox and the Mets. Mostly though, I'm just a fan of the game in general.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM
midtown,
The current issue with the financial markets has less to do with a failure of the free market system then a fundamental misunderstanding of the risks involved with CMOs, CDSs, and other derivatives. The people in charge just weren't equipped to understand the complexities of these new products.
Basically, the market itself involved to fast for the people in control to make informed rational decisions. For some reason I don't think that really applies to baseball and the FA market...I'm pretty sure the assets available on that have evolved quite as quickly.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 17, 2008 at 11:09 AM
"The only weakness they have is the starting rotation"
If the ONLY weakness the Orioles have is their rotation, then why are they going all in on an impact bat that will probably cost them a full third of their annual salary? Surely they would've focused on Sabathia or Burnett instead.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM
midtown ... you sure you want to go down this path. There are plenty of regulated economies who have had more than 1 depression in the past 80 years. Would you like a list?
Also, what does Boras going to a small Law School have to do with his business practices? Are you suggesting that if he had been Harvard educated he would be more moral? And is Boras really not a moral person?
His job is to represent his clients to the best of his ability. Like a good defense attorney, he uses everything at his disposal to get the job done. He tricks and manipulates the system for maximum impact. He employs the same tactics that teams use (leak private negotiations, inflate/deflate offers, feign interest to drive up prices for competitors, etc). To the best of my knowledge, Boras has never done anything illegal.
In a free market environment, teams choose who to deal with. If dealing with Boras is such an awful experience why do teams keep trying to sign his players? If teams boycotted him the market would adjust with clients leaving Boras to go find a new agent OR Boras would be forced to bring his business practices in-line with what baseball exec's believe is fair.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM
"So...was it Andy MacPhail, Jim Bowden, Brian Cashman, or Tony Reagins?"
It was Theo Epstein.
Posted by: A | December 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM
I am sure we are all for whatever the market will bear...but that doesn't make it right. Ever hear of the words PARODOX OF VALUE. Unfortunately our country is in a situation where high priced teams can rape the tax payers and then justify the fact that elite players are needed to compete and in turn raise ticket prices to justify salaries which in turn make America's pasttime into a game that can only be spectated by the rich and powerful. Sounds like a screwed up system to me.
Posted by: James PLouffe | December 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM
"The only weakness they have is the starting rotation"
That's like saying the only bad thing about Jeffrey Dahmer was that he killed and ate people. The rotation is a disaster, but if you get a chance at an impact bat, a hometown boy no less, you go after it.
Posted by: vtadave | December 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM
People keep saying that ticket prices are only afforded by the rich. I am far from rich, I live in NYC and while I am by no means poor, I am closer to the lower end of the middle class than I am to the upper. I buy a 41 game package for the Yankees. The tickets cost me $20 each per game. Even in the new stadium, that is what they are costing. The corporate boxes and the field level seats have gone up, but the prices for the upper deck and the bleachers are staying the same. There are 10-15 dates where the entire upper deck is $5.
Try going to a Broadway show, a concert or out to dinner in NYC for 20 bucks! Heck, a day at Six Flags is $50!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:34 AM
41 games package is every other game starting with opening day so I get to see the elite teams and the Sox..
Just kidding there, but I couldnt resist :)
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM
"People keep saying that ticket prices are only afforded by the rich. I am far from rich, I live in NYC and while I am by no means poor, I am closer to the lower end of the middle class than I am to the upper. I buy a 41 game package for the Yankees. The tickets cost me $20 each per game. Even in the new stadium, that is what they are costing. The corporate boxes and the field level seats have gone up, but the prices for the upper deck and the bleachers are staying the same. There are 10-15 dates where the entire upper deck is $5."
That's not the way the media portrays it. Just saying..
And I think Dahmer would be offended to be associated with Baltimore's rotation.
And, I think people should appreciate Boras more. He's like the Albert Pujols of agents.
Posted by: scribbletone | December 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Scribble..
I agree which is why I explained in detail as someone who does buy "affordable" tickets. I cant afford the lower level seats if I want to go to that many games, but its not like the entrie stadium is out of reach for the "average Joe".
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:41 AM
bosox87: "i believe that there is a triple threat going on with boras i think whoever signs tex will also sign tek and lowe. call me crazy but its a little fishy."
What have you seen that makes you believe that? (Or are you just running low on tin foil?)
Posted by: Little Bear | December 17, 2008 at 11:43 AM
"you know deep down you have a B on your heart."
LMAO!!! Nope..but I really do have an NY tattooed on my leg!!!
Ugh..what you said just made me ill!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Thats ok bosox...cause my next one you will probably hate even more. Im going to get the football team I root for on the other side of my leg..and it's not the Jets or Giants.
Care to guess?
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:49 AM
"the "b" could be for bastards won two and we spent twice as much to keep this bs from happening."
Nah...Im ok with them winning the 2. For 86 years people tried to pretend there was a rivalry, now there really is one. I actually handled 04 better than I ever thought I would. Arguing with Sox fans is more fun when you guys at least have SOME ammunition..as long as we have more, Im ok with it.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Oh god no...The Colts are about one millimeter belwo the Sox on my most hated list. I think I hate Peyton as much as I have ever hated anyone on the Sox.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM
James PLouffe,
First of all, you don't seem to grasp what the paradox of value says. It doesn't say that water should be more valuable than diamonds (using the classic example), it is basically an open question of why diamonds are more valuable than water. Are you trying to ask why MLB players are worth more than, say, school teachers?
I'm just going to leave aside your whole argument about teams "screwing" the tax payer for now. Its an extremely complex issue that I could go on and on about. I'll just say that there is a reasonable argument that a major sports team adds both intangible and tangible value to a city and that the city should be willing to help support them in return.
As for your comment about ticket prices going up because of spending on free agents you are just wrong. JC Bradbury (an economics professor) studied that very issue and found no significant correlation between the two.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 17, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Missing the playoffs was barely a blip on my radar. I am 42 years old and have been to 6 WS parades. I dont have to talk about 26 rings blah blah blah..I have seen my team win more WS than fans of any other team. As long as I know they are fielding a competitive team every single year Im fine.
As for the worst team..I know it wont be the Yanks..and if you are suggesting it will be for any other reason than to get me going, this conversation should probably be over :)
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM
"wow, thats pretty damn bad, a millimeter below the sox coming from a self proclaimed yankee fan is just breath taking i think we are on to something here..a breakthrough in sports, the Manning family is the most hated family in all of sports including ole archibald."
I agree..I HATE all of them! A friend in Boston ( Pats and Sox season ticket holder and a friend...go figure) got me a shirt up there that says "I hate Payton Manning" on the front and on the back it says "Oh and by the way, Eli sucks too"
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 11:57 AM
I hate those shirts..I really dont care who Jeter sucks as long as he doesnt do it during the games...LOL
My fave anti Yank shirt I saw in Boston was Johnny Demon 666=18. LOVED that one :)
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Are you suggesting that if he (Boras) had been Harvard educated he would be more moral? And is Boras really not a moral person?
- I'm questiong whether Boras was awake during his Civil Procedure class. Think about the term - a civil set of procedures by which the facts of a case may be discovered so that a dispute may be resolved. But, Boras doesn't play a civil game aimed at discovery, now does he. He exploits the fact that teams are not permitted to discuss player negotiations with one another (since that would give rise to claims of collusion) and misrepresents the existence (or, more often than not, the non-existence) of competing offers. My guess is that Boras didn't become a litigator precisely because he couldn't function within an atmosphere of civility or honesty.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 12:03 PM
bosox...I have no clue how these "mixed marriages" work. I could never in a million years be married to a Sox fan. I assume with those couples one is not real passionate about the game. My daughter (who is as big of a fan as I am) dated a Sox fan for about a week. She called me from college and said "it just cant work".
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:04 PM
"only been to 2 of those parades but by the end of my life i hope i see a whole lot more. tis the season to be jolly got cc all wrapped up and standing beside the tree couldnt seem to get him under it though could ya, and burnett you just recieved a new mri"
Well since CC doesnt have to pitch from under a tree, Im good there, and AJ did get a new MRI..one that gave him a clean bill of health!
Honestly, I wanted Tex more than CC..Im not a big CC fan and really do think he is David Wells bad back waiting to happen. All I can do is root for the guy and hope for the best.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:07 PM
"I hate those shirts..I really dont care who Jeter sucks as long as he doesnt do it during the games...LOL
My fave anti Yank shirt I saw in Boston was Johnny Demon 666=18. LOVED that one :)"
I hate most "anti-whatever" shirts and stickers. I'd prefer to root for something than against something. If anything I'[d want a relatively mild or ironic one. I would probably buy a shirt that says, in its entirety, "Honestly, I'm really not all the big on Derek Jeter. He seems like an OK guy and all, but I could stand to see his face less often."
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 12:12 PM
The dif with AJ and Pavano (I hope) is that AJ has balls. I hate Pavano, not cause he was hurt, but because I dont think he wanted to be in NY and therefore didnt try. Some of his injuries were suspect.
I disagree with what you say about CC. Im worried about his back not his arm. There is nothing to show anything he did last season will do anything to his arm. I HATE the way pitchers are babied these days.
I also dont think what he did was stupid..I like that he said he would do whatever it took to help his team, even if it might have ended up costing him $$ if he had gotten hurt.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM
At least Teixeira's consistent. I pity the Yankees for signing Burnett. The 4 years prior to last year, the guy only averaged 24.5 starts and 158 innings. It's like he's trying to be Rich Harden.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Well, what was was..all i can do is hope that he stays healthy now. Yanks needed pitching, they took a big risk on a guy that can provide a big reward.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:25 PM
What I meant was, I was not worried about his workload in the past leading to arm troubles.
Nothing there that leads me to think he WILL ave back trouble, just something that concerns me after seeing Wells and what happened to him. Tho from what I understand CC's conditioning is much different from Wells (which was non existent).
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:32 PM
You forgot the most important one...BEER!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM
ESPN is making it sound like the Orioles are out of the running unless Teixeira is willing to take a deep discount - which isn't going to happen. Even if the Nationals popped him an extra $10 million or so, I can't imagine it would be worth the frustration and headache. More and more, this is looking like a done deal for the Red Sox. Theo just has to keep from flinching. Stay put at 8 years Theo!
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 12:41 PM
Where did you hear that Bosox?
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Burnett is a better investment then Harden.
Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 12:34 PM
Perhaps. But, is he a better bet than a securitized mortgage? Or, to quote Gordon Gecko, are they all just "dogs with fleas."
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 12:48 PM
Well if you get confirmation, let us know.
Tex is one of my fave players not on the Yanks, has been since his days in Texas. The only thing that would make me happier than him going to the Yanks would be him NOT going to the Sox!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM
preliminary agreement reached with baltimore!!!????? WTF?
Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 12:43 PM
must of been a fake email report i got it on my blackberry but i went to foxspors and its not there sorry.
Posted by: bosox87 | December 17, 2008 at 12:49 PM
It sounds like an e-mail intended for Theo Epstein and sent by Scott Boras.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 12:55 PM
shocking development if it were baltimore, that mean tex took the discount, but i doubt it since his heart was set on going for $200 million. i think it will be the red sox or the nationals in the end
Posted by: 04Forever | December 17, 2008 at 12:58 PM
if d lowe is looking at 18 mil per year as is being reported. teix is worth every cent of 25 mil.
i hate comparing player contracts especially pitcher and position players but for what they will add to their team it isnt even close.
Posted by: yaz.doyle | December 17, 2008 at 01:09 PM
If it's a $200 million deal, Tex would pay $8 million more in state income tax by playing for the Angels.
Posted by: midtown | December 17, 2008 at 01:11 PM
"I disagree with what you say about CC. Im worried about his back not his arm. There is nothing to show anything he did last season will do anything to his arm. I HATE the way pitchers are babied these days."
Blame HOF'er Jim Palmer for starting all of this and begining of the pitch count trend Yankeegirl, the guy named muscles to get injured many ballplayers never knew even existed before he started getting hurt in the late 70's/early 80's and Palmer and Manager earl Weaver used to go "round and round" about his injuries and all the Dr's he would go to to find what ailment, or muscle was pulled.
Posted by: johns | December 17, 2008 at 01:46 PM
John..I remember that, didnt hear much about it in NY, but I remember reading bits an pieces about all the Drs he would go to. Still like the guy tho, I used to love watching him pitch when I was a kid.
I just hate the whole 100 pitch thing even if a guy is cruising. I hate that there are hardly any complete games and I especially HATE that the Yanks are treating Joba like he is a fragile piece of china. The kid is 24 years old, let him freakin pitch!!
I dont' remember any other pitcher on the Yanks, or any other team being treated with kid gloves the way Joba is.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 01:53 PM
gm's that make press statements like "our deal has flexibility" are usually the ones who are delusional, its like him saying "well, the other deals are better, we arent going to offer more money, but our deal is still better"
orioles should just forget it and move on to giambi or dunn
Posted by: 04Forever | December 17, 2008 at 02:24 PM
I think you're missing the point of his statement, 04Forever. I read that as "our current offer is not our final offer."
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 02:28 PM
i think hes bluffing, if he ups the offer, not only will i be stunned, tex should take it and run, even if its even with the other offers
Posted by: 04Forever | December 17, 2008 at 02:36 PM
I just hate the whole 100 pitch thing even if a guy is cruising. I hate that there are hardly any complete games and I especially HATE that the Yanks are treating Joba like he is a fragile piece of china. The kid is 24 years old, let him freakin pitch!!
I dont' remember any other pitcher on the Yanks, or any other team being treated with kid gloves the way Joba is.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 01:53 PM
Unfortunately, in this day and age the damage to young pitchers arm's is done at a much much earlier age. In little league kids are no longer allowed to throw nearly as much as they use to be able to. This results in a ton of future problems because it is at these very early years that the human body/muscles develop an ability to "recover" from strain. Because kids are being babied from day one, their bodies don't learn correct muscle memory/recovery. By the time these kids get to the majors its already too late. This is why we are seeing more and more younger arms going down with strains.
One of the best examples of the sham that is pitch counts is Tom Glavine.
By age 26 or 27 he ranks as one of the highest guys ever with regards to Innings pitched. 20 years later he has just 1 trip to the DL and that was last year.
Maddux also falls into this category.
It will be interesting when Matsuzaka's career is over to see how his arm held up after all the innings he pitched when he was a kid.
Unfortunately though, in this day and age until things change at the "DEVELOPMENTAL" levels, all the arms that come into MLB will have been "developed" poorly and will experience trouble.
On another note about Pitch Counts.....
Why don't warm up pitches before the inning count? Why does a junkball pitch in an 0-2 situation count as much as a hard fastball in a 3-1 situation? Surely in the situation where a pitcher is wasting a pitch he doesn't exert as much strain as he does trying to sneak a fastball by a guy down the middle.
As you can tell I hate pitch counts.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 17, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Rumor out there that if the Red Sox sign Texiera, then the Brewers may offer a trade to them.
Brewers trade JJ Hardy to the Red Sox for Mike Lowell and Manny Delcarmen.
This would allow the Brewers to fill their need at 3b. Have Delcarmen in the bullpen and move McClung to the closer role. Then they could trade Bill Hall and Cameron to the Yankees for Cabrera and Igawa.
Then sign a few FA starting pitchers and we would be ok. Escobar at SS and Weeks at 2b.
Posted by: craig | December 17, 2008 at 02:40 PM
"It will be interesting when Matsuzaka's career is over to see how his arm held up after all the innings he pitched when he was a kid."
I really wish that Francona would just give up and start leaving him out there for 150 pitches to see what happens.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 02:44 PM
Kangaroo...
I agree with all of it, and I dont like it so much in LL either. I mean sure, I dont want to see an 8 year old throwing his arm out but some of the limitations are ridiculous.
The 2 guys you mentioned are proof of that.
I coached girls fastpitch for years and they limit the girls as well when its been proven that girls underhand windmill is a more natural motion and does not cause any harm to the arm or shoulder. Heck you see college girls throwing 2 or 3 games in a day, but yet LL limits them as well.
And I have been asking myself what you wrote in your last paragraph for years.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 02:45 PM
If they Red Sox do end up getting Teixeria, who will the Sox try to get for Lowell? Maybe a catcher? I would think that they would try to ship Mike Lowell and 1ST Base prospect Lars Anderson together.
Posted by: redsoxbaseball | December 17, 2008 at 02:46 PM
Craig..
The Brewers want to move Cameron for no other reason than salary relief yet they are going to take on Lowell a guy coming off injury who makes something like 13 mil a year? I dunno..that just doesnt seem like something the Brewers would do.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 17, 2008 at 02:48 PM
"Brewers trade JJ Hardy to the Red Sox for Mike Lowell and Manny Delcarmen. "
That trade doesn't make any sense for the Red Sox. They'd solve the Mike Lowell problem, but suddenly have a glaring hole in their bullpen and three shortstops, one of whom is pretty much impossible to unload and the only way Lowrie would get anything of value is packaged with someone else. Hardy is good and all, but useless to the Sox.
Hardy has no place on the Sox. Lowrie's a guy with solid on base potential. His defense is questionable, but I'd just as soon give him a real shot starting before essentially pulling the plug on his career in an effort to unload Lowell.
The Brewers could offer that, sure, but there's no way it'd get done.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 02:51 PM
craig, c'mon, that sounds like a BS rumor to me. that would really be a stupid trade for MIL...
Posted by: Mowses | December 17, 2008 at 02:51 PM
"If they Red Sox do end up getting Teixeria, who will the Sox try to get for Lowell? Maybe a catcher? I would think that they would try to ship Mike Lowell and 1ST Base prospect Lars Anderson together."
Unlikely. Anderson is pretty close to untouchable right now. If the Sox sign Teixeira, Anderson sticks around since he's projected to be ready around the time Ortiz's contract is up. Anderson will likely be our next DH.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 02:53 PM
Maybe. How how much longer is David's contract, and would Theo just let him go?
Posted by: redsoxbaseball | December 17, 2008 at 02:59 PM
"Maybe. How how much longer is David's contract, and would Theo just let him go?"
Two years with a club option for 2011.
You better believe Theo would let him go if it came down to it. If we lock up Teixeira for eight years and Anderson pans out to be the hitter he's supposed to be, there's no reason for the Sox to keep Ortiz around short of sentimentality. I love Ortiz as much as the next guy and honestly, I think the claims that he's regressing are pretty effectively B.S. (His stats don't bare it out as anything other than effects of his wrist injury), he will eventually start to regress and Anderson's got both the contact ability and the power ceiling to potentially replace Ortiz as a DH while adding the value of a competent backup glove, opening up an extra roster spot. It's entirely possible the Sox might exercise his 2011 option, but odds are, it'll be as a bench player if we get Teixeira.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Hahahahahahaha, JJ Hardy for Lowell and Delcarmen? And that wouldn't 'get it done' on the SOX end?
Hahahahahahahahahaha, oh my god, oh my god. You are so. incredibly. idiotic. I literally can't believe it.
Posted by: AndrewYF | December 17, 2008 at 03:20 PM
hey guys, just a random question while on the topic of tex. the braves received kotchman and a minor league pitcher for half a year for tex. kotchman is young and under control until after 2011. with that said, do you think the mets can get saunders for a whole year for delgado, or do you think the mets would have to give a prospect as well. if so who would the prospect have to be? thanks
Posted by: krazymetsfan24 | December 17, 2008 at 03:21 PM
Not going to repeat what I've already said about the Tex situation or the state of baseball economics (if interested, check other threads)...
Just have to say: I don't understand this move by the Orioles. Part of me- the hopeless optimist- can't help but think this sounds SO wrong, maybe we're missing something. This may be the most important potential signing in recent franchise history and we're...lowballing him?!!! WTF is right!!!!
I'm just waiting for bosox87's blackberry to confirm the previous story, but if it's going to happen, it'll be a quick, hush-hush all-in offer. As it stands now, the O's would be better off just pulling their deal and shooting off apology emails to season ticket holders.
"Dear Sir or Madam. After 12 abysmal years of complete incompetence, gross misconduct, horrible judgment, greed, malaise, and stupidity, the entire Orioles organization would like to apologize...and offer more of the same...at a steep markup! We'd also like to gang-bang your mother while pouring sugar in your gas tank, and lighting your home on fire!
We appreciate your loyalty and hope you'll stick with us for another decade of futility and frustration!
The Oriole Bird"
Ugh.
Posted by: milehigh78 | December 17, 2008 at 03:30 PM
Sorry it was a dumb thing to post on a RUMOR BOARD. It wasn't my idea! I was just saying it! Sorry for posting this to you all.
I guess posting a RUMOR on a RUMOR Board is a bad thing to do? F you Andrew
Posted by: craig | December 17, 2008 at 03:31 PM
krazymetsfan-
Apples and oranges, dude. Sorry, but there is absolutely NO CHANCE that happens. NONE.
Teams don't trade away good young pitching for aging sluggers in decline. Ever.
Posted by: milehigh78 | December 17, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Wasn't sure where to put this but thought it was cool. Was looking at the old archives, and in one of the '05 rumors Tim says:
"Mark my words, the Devil Rays will be a contender by 2007."
Someone responds with:
"The Devil Rays a contender in 2007? Who is the person that wrote that trying to kid?
If the Devil Rays get to 3rd place by 2015, it will be a shocker.
Contender in 2007? HA, don't make me laugh too hard!
Face it, Tampa Bay isn't going anywhere anytime soon, and they sure aren't going to be playoff contenders by 2007. If they make it to 3rd place, that would shock me."
Guess you were so wrong Tim, by a year at least. ;)
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2005/11/julio-lugo-to-t.html#comments
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 17, 2008 at 03:36 PM
I wasn't calling you dumb, craig. It's a bad trade obviously, but it's not like you commented on it either way. 0bsessions actually thought it was a bad trade for the Red Sox, when in fact that would be one of the worst trades of the decade, in all of baseball, for Milwaukee.
Posted by: AndrewYF | December 17, 2008 at 03:39 PM
I think every job should have some equivalent to a pitch count. If you're a carpenter or something, you get pulled after driving 125 nails- less if you're not 'on' that day. A lawyer in the middle of his summation might get the hook after 200 words. Mathematicians would have a hard 25 equation count. Keep us all fresh!
Posted by: milehigh78 | December 17, 2008 at 03:40 PM
BTW-
WTF is 'flexibility?' That's kind of an enigmatic thing to say... Maybe they're preparing a big push! Then again, maybe Andy's just being a d-bag; posturing for the sake of perception.
Posted by: milehigh78 | December 17, 2008 at 03:49 PM
One last note from myself on the pitch count thing from myself that was mentioned here from little leaguer's here that was mentioned above and i can attest to: 40+ years ago a little league pitcher was allowed to throw anything they could, be it a curve ball, fastball, anything and as many pitches as they wanted, or could. I know and did up until "aged out" at 14 years old back then. Now, they are told no curve balls because it damages the wrist and few innings and brought out, or was several years ago when I volunteer coached some.
That was a doozy Andrew on JJ Hardy for MDC and Lowell, but Sox have no need to swap MDC for him anyway and can always swap Lowell to the twins after they finish choking on Wiggington and he goes elsewhere this winter.
Posted by: johns | December 17, 2008 at 03:52 PM
No harm. No Foul.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 17, 2008 at 03:52 PM
milehigh78,
You Rock.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 17, 2008 at 03:54 PM
A reliable source said the O's offer was seven years 147 million. The source also said Boras wants nine years @ 21 million a year and the O's are countering with eight years at 21 million a year......
Posted by: fearthechant | December 17, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Hes going to Boston. Thats where Boras wants him to go and he said he wanted to go to the east coast. Plus the Sox are a contender
Posted by: Reality Check | December 17, 2008 at 04:28 PM
"0bsessions actually thought it was a bad trade for the Red Sox, when in fact that would be one of the worst trades of the decade, in all of baseball, for Milwaukee."
Show me where I said it wasn't a bad trade for Milwaukee. Just because I say it's a bad trade for Boston doesn't mean I think the other team is getting some great deal either. But hey, it's cute how you fly off the handle like that over so little a thing.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 17, 2008 at 04:35 PM
"I think every job should have some equivalent to a pitch count. If you're a carpenter or something, you get pulled after driving 125 nails- less if you're not 'on' that day. A lawyer in the middle of his summation might get the hook after 200 words. Mathematicians would have a hard 25 equation count. Keep us all fresh! "
Posted by: milehigh78 | December 17, 2008 at 03:40 PM
Toss in a pay raise by a few Million and I think we could call it a good, fair plan for everyone.
As for the back and forth on Teixeira......
bottom line - whoever signs the guy gets an impact bat for the middle of their order for the next 8 years.
Over that time, the guy should hit a combined 200+ HR's with 800+ RBI's/RUNS while playing exceptional defense and giving the lineup flexibilty due to his switch hitting.
$21-23 Million sounds more reasonable looking at that type of production.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 17, 2008 at 04:47 PM