![]() |
|
|
| |
« No Trade Market For Jack Wilson | Main | Cardinals Rumors: Fuentes, Saito, Kawakami, Uehara »
12:07am: Sean McAdam of the Boston Herald does not believe the Red Sox will go beyond eight years for Teixeira.
10:32am: WEEI has a transcript of comments from Karl Ravech of ESPN regarding Tex. Ravech believes "a decision is getting closer and closer to being made." He says teams are escalating their offers and Teixeira should land in the $22-28MM salary range. You can also hear Ravech's comments in a video at ESPN.com (upper right corner).
8:24am: According to Michael Silverman of the Boston Herald, the Red Sox made an offer to Mark Teixeira. Silverman believes it to be for eight years. Tex is believed to be seeking more than $21MM per year, closer to Alex Rodriguez's $27.5MM per year.
The Angels are reportedly at eight years and at least $160MM, the Orioles around seven years, $140-150MM, and the Nationals at eight years, $160MM.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053677ed57970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mark Teixeira Rumors: Tuesday:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
WOW things are heating up early TIM
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 08:28 AM
I don't care what he's seeking...he's absolutely not worth more than 21 million annually. "closer to Alex Rodriguez's $27.5MM per year" is a joke.
Posted by: gfulla | December 16, 2008 at 08:29 AM
"Tex is believed to be seeking more than $21MM per year, closer to Alex Rodriguez's $27.5MM per year."
My my, someone is full of themself.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | December 16, 2008 at 08:30 AM
I wonder if it is no-trade contract.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 08:30 AM
"Tex is believed to be seeking more than $21MM per year"
So am I, who isn't?
Posted by: A | December 16, 2008 at 08:40 AM
I really thought this management would never offer a long term deal again. I was off on this one.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 08:40 AM
finally...
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 08:42 AM
Lot of money for sure and especially for a 1st basemen where middleaged ballplayers go eventually.. Fortunately, if the Sox do sign him he hopefully will be effective for the 1st 5+ years at least at elite level and make the contract worthwile and last 3-4 years hopefully adequate, but still would prefer that these absurd contracts only be handed out by the Yankees and the Sox continue the path that they have been using the past few years of loyalty contracts plus home grown talent.
Posted by: johns | December 16, 2008 at 08:42 AM
So, how much is Pujols worth? 35 Millions a year?
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 16, 2008 at 08:44 AM
Tell you the truth, I am not sure this is direction we should be going in.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 08:51 AM
So, how much is Pujols worth? 35 Millions a year?
Exactly... if Arod is worth $30M a year....
Posted by: Xycosis | December 16, 2008 at 08:51 AM
A-Rod money for a line of .290/.378/.541/134 OPS+. Compare that to A-Rod's line of .306/.389/.578/147 OPS+. Factor in A-Rod's position and better base running ability and you've got to wonder where its coming from. Of course he has Boras as his agent and Boras thinks Ryan Madson compares w/Rivera. . .
Posted by: Yewnork | December 16, 2008 at 08:52 AM
"So, how much is Pujols worth? 35 Millions a year?"
If Tex is "worth" ~25 million AAV then YES...
Posted by: gfulla | December 16, 2008 at 08:52 AM
I think the Red Sox are looking to the next few off-seasons and don't see anyone they like from the list of possible free agents who they could plug into the cleanup spot in the lineup.
With Manny gone and Ortiz sliding the last 2 years (we have to wait and see if it's because of injury or age) I can see why the Red Sox went against they're policy of not offering long-term deals.
Posted by: Peagle8 | December 16, 2008 at 08:54 AM
21.5M a year, that's a joke! What would that make him the second highest paid position player. Joke, Joke, Joke!
Posted by: dchillis | December 16, 2008 at 08:54 AM
Seems like the "Yankees North" are going to get their man after all.
Good luck trading Mike Lowell's contract, Theo.
Posted by: tolo316 | December 16, 2008 at 08:54 AM
Actually JedStyle, due to Teixeira's time in Atlanta he would not be a 10-5 candidate in 5 years.
Anybody know the ETA of Lars Anderson? What are the sox going to do with him if they sign Teixeira?
Posted by: BoSoxRI | December 16, 2008 at 08:54 AM
great point on pujols, but at least its not 21MM a year in a long term deal with a pitcher with no insurance if he blows his arm out in the first three years.
the best scenario the yanks can hope for is CC having a mediocre first few years. so he doesnt opt out. and the yanks "faithful" staying behind him so he doesnt leave for not feeling welcome.
if he performs unbelievable the first three years im sure boras wont push for him to hit the free agent market though...haha
Posted by: yaz.doyle | December 16, 2008 at 08:54 AM
As I said yesterday, the best fit for him is in Boston. He can go to a winning team and he won't have to be "the guy". Plus Boston really needs to add a bat to give Ortiz some protection: http://www.ontheblack.com/2008/12/15/teixeira-should-go-to-boston/
Posted by: kerelcooper | December 16, 2008 at 08:56 AM
Lot of money??? I don't think so, I think the economy has hurt him... He is a stud.. . Also, I hear their is a deadline on the Redsox offer.... It's gonna come down to a bidding war between the Orioles and the Redsox, one of them will give up. Decision by Friday. Press conference December 22 @ 333 West Camden....
Posted by: fearthechant | December 16, 2008 at 08:56 AM
Pujols is worth 35 to 40 million per year by most estimates. That number includes him being one of the most valuable defensive players in baseball.
It's very possible that Tex could be worth $27.5. If he consistently was producing OPS over 1.000, then maybe. I'm skeptical though. A reasonable projection would be an OPS around .900. Plus on that long a contract, he'll be declining towards the end of it.
$20M sounds about right, and if you really want him and have to go to $22M a year, then I guess you have to do it.
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 08:57 AM
I am old school where I belive quality starters is the foundation.
Really nervous about Beckett and his velocity down significantly end of last year. Lester, still just second full season. I think he will be fine, Dice-K and the walks, 4th and 5th starters up in the air. I know Wakefield but really, is he the answer. Very skeptical here my friends.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 08:59 AM
Lets remember Ortiz is signed until 2010 with an option for 2011.
Lar Anderson would probably be a 2010 September call-up.
Basically, the 8 years to Teixeira is fine because the Sox can alternate Teixeira/Anderson at 1B/DH starting as soon as 2011 or in 2012 to ensure their 8 year investment stays healthy over the life of the contract.
I think the Manny situation would have been a lot different if the Sox could have had him alternate DH/LF on a consistent basis for the later half of his long term contract.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 16, 2008 at 09:00 AM
"Actually JedStyle, due to Teixeira's time in Atlanta he would not be a 10-5 candidate in 5 years.
Anybody know the ETA of Lars Anderson? What are the sox going to do with him if they sign Teixeira?"
Tex has exactly 5 years of service time right now. How will he not be a 10 and 5 guy if he spends the next 5 years playing for the sox?
As far as Lars he wasn't going to be ready for anything more than a potential late season call up this year anyways. Most people think he'll be Ortiz successor at DH...or a quality piece of trade bait.
Posted by: gfulla | December 16, 2008 at 09:00 AM
Redsox = Evil Empire II.
Posted by: jnr98 | December 16, 2008 at 09:04 AM
Anderson traded? Got to see him at AA last year. Very good hitter. But still needs time. Beginning AA again this year, if he continues like this moves up fast to AAA, no reason not to bring him up end of next season when rosters expand. If he tears up AAA, never know.
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 09:05 AM
yaz.doyle, Everybody in here is comparing this offer with A-rod contract and you had to bring up the CC deal like we haven't heard enough of it. The Yankees and t he Sox are the same teams, they are developing young talent and at the same time signing good veteran players. Some teams can only do one.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 16, 2008 at 09:06 AM
I always thought the 10 in 10-5 referred to 10 years in the either the National or American League, not a cumulative total of Major League service time.
Posted by: BoSoxRI | December 16, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Red Sox trying to buy another championship...
Posted by: C.K. | December 16, 2008 at 09:09 AM
gfulla,
On Anderson, he would likely spend all of 2009 in AAA with the potential for a September call up.
In 2010, he would not be called up until at least 2 months into the season as the Red Sox would not want to start his arbitration/free agency clock.
The Sox hold a team option on Ortiz for 2011, so it would be likely Anderson ETA is contingent upon Ortiz's numbers over the next 2 seasons.
If Ortiz's production starts to decline, the Sox would call up Anderson earlier. If Ortiz's production remains strong then the Sox have the option of keeping Anderson down longer.
There is no harm tothe Sox keeping him in AAA for 2 more years.
Most players don't fully develop their power until after age 25 and usually it is around age 27.
Since power is arguably Andersons best attribute it is probably in the Sox best interest to let him develop the power/confidence at AAA.
Of course the other option that immediately comes onto the table is trading Anderson for a catcher.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 16, 2008 at 09:10 AM
So if the Sox sign Tex, they have to trade Lowell, right?
Assuming you project Lowell to have, say, an .840 OPS, and Tex a .900, how much do you really gain?
I'm not too familiar with their defense, but I think Lowell is better than Youkilis at 3B, and obviously Tex is better than Youkilis at 1B. But those improvements probably come close to canceling each other out.
So is it really worth the huge money and long committment for an incremental ~.060 gain in OPS? I'm not so sure.
Sure, Tex would make any team but the Cardinals better, but it seems like the Sox are not really adressing a major need here.
What do Boston fans think?
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 09:12 AM
If this was the Yankees everyone would be pissed out of their minds, since it is the Red Sox it is no big deal. Typical.
Posted by: C.K. | December 16, 2008 at 09:14 AM
Yaz...just ony "tiny" error in your line of thinking...CC is NOT represented by Boras, so Boras cannot push him to do anything.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 16, 2008 at 09:15 AM
"Redsox = Evil Empire II."
No thats foolish. You do know that the Yankees, tigers and Mets all had higher payrolls then the Red Sox, right? They could sign Tex for 22 million a year and Varitek for 7 million a year, and still come out with a lower payroll then in 08.
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 16, 2008 at 09:16 AM
According to ESPN we are going to know real soon.......
Posted by: fearthechant | December 16, 2008 at 09:17 AM
"Redsox = Evil Empire II."
way to drink the kool aid
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 09:18 AM
"Red Sox trying to buy another championship..."
Are the Angels trying to buy a championship too?
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 16, 2008 at 09:19 AM
Just read it too, like the Godfather "Make him an offer he cant refuse".
Posted by: Cyyoung | December 16, 2008 at 09:20 AM
i hate it when fans complain about teams that spend money, dont get mad at other teams just because your owners never pony up money or because other teams can always offer more, fire your executives, but nobody likes a whiner
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Some people amaze me.
The Evil Empire II>???
The Red Sox and Yankees are the same>???
Get a clue people, please!
The Red Sox are going after ONE player and he is an excellent player at that. He is young talent that should continue to grow.
He is 5 years younger than A-Rod and would be signing a deal that is shorter by 2 years.
He is not an over-weight over-worked pitcher.
He is not a player with DL history all over his career.
The Red Sox do their research rather than just throw money around simply because they have it.
Posted by: GreenMachine | December 16, 2008 at 09:22 AM
So when is the ESPN report that the Yankees are preparing to make an offer coming out?
Posted by: tolo316 | December 16, 2008 at 09:23 AM
If the Sox are paying for Tex over 21m a year, Red Sox actually loses in the long-term. But I think Boras encouraged Tex to raise his price-tag.
Posted by: Kelv | December 16, 2008 at 09:24 AM
touche yankgirly touche.
anyone else getting the feeling this deal is being paired with variteks.
announcement for both at the end of this week...i hope
Posted by: yaz.doyle | December 16, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Why don't all of u do some reading before commenting. Only reason sox bid higher than 8/160 is because they rejected his no trade clause and his opt out clause.
Really in team value 8/200 with free range with teix is better than 8/160 on his terms.
They would fully control him for 8 years
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:29 AM
"Assuming you project Lowell to have, say, an .840 OPS, and Tex a .900, how much do you really gain?"
Even if Lowell is healthy his projection is for .800 or less in OPS and tex has been over .950 in 3 of the last 4 years. So .150+ points in OPS is worth that change. Besides most of that value is a change in OBP which has been found to be 3 times as valuable as SLG.
wOBA for Lowell is .347 projection for 2009 and Tex is projected at .412. There is a huge difference just on offense alone.
Also Youk has a 13.9 UZR/150 at 3B, so he is just as good, although there maybe an adjustment phase.
Posted by: Trizza | December 16, 2008 at 09:31 AM
On Anderson, I agree with the poster that he will likely get his first call in 2010 but not late as one poster suggested as a September callup.
Boston will need more then a few weeks to determine if he's the real deal to take over for Ortiz.
Probably can expect a late May 2010 call for Anderson.
Posted by: TJ Sox Fan | December 16, 2008 at 09:31 AM
Not to mention anyone who offered 8/160 (angels) with all the player protections shud hardly be calling the red sox evil empire 2. Especially considering had u signed teix at that price u wud have a higher payroll than us... Yea we r evil as hell
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Sox do not give no-trade deals because many of their players have deals that state if a teammate gets a no-trade deal their contract becomes a no-trade.
I believe Ortiz has this and possibly Drew. I know Tek's old deal had this.
Posted by: Trizza | December 16, 2008 at 09:33 AM
"if he continues to hit 200 points more a year in post season average than a-rod than thats cool"
Tex has played exactly 1 post season series. In Arod's first 4 games of the post season he hit rather well too.
Shane Spencer hit .500 in his first post season, maybe he should have been paid 21 mil a year too.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 16, 2008 at 09:33 AM
Lars anderson will take over as dh when ready. I can't link post cause I'm on phone, but will get that for u wen I get home. Theo and francona have both spoken of him a dh
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:34 AM
Here is an interesting thought of the day:
IF and its still a big IF, the Sox were to reach the World Series.....would the Red Sox ever actually sit Teixeira to play Ortiz at 1B?
With Lowell/Teixeira/Youkilis the Sox can rotate Lowell/Youkilis if they want although Youk plays more then adequate defense.
During the season, with Lowell/Youk/Teixeira the Sox can rotate these 3 and provide extra days off to all of them, ensuring they all stay healthy all year.
Point is....we all assume the Sox are trading Lowell if they sign Teixeira, but I think it at least needs to be considered that the Sox would listen to offers for Ortiz.
Ortiz is a great hitter, has meant a ton to the franchise, but if they can get the best deal to help them win now/future by moving Ortiz, Theo has shown in the past he will make the deal.
Ortiz is signed for a reasonable contract, has a team option for 2011 making him appealing to virtually every other AL team. The question is whether or not he would waive his 10/5 rights to allow a trade.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 16, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Ortiz has notrade thru 10/5 protection. Not cause sox gave to him same with tek. Drew has no notrade. That's once again y sox paid top dollar instead of player bonuses
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Really? Youkilis is better at 3B than Lowell? I didn't know that. (that's not sarcasm).
Looking at the Sox, they're in a tough spot, because there is no obvious place to upgrade. Guys like Ellsbury, Lowrie, Drew are either young with some potential and considerable value, or untradable.
Wakefield is a bargain, but at some point you need to go for performance over cost savings, and with Masterson/Buchholz, you know it's not likely they'll be amazing, but you have to give them a chance to pitch.
Catcher is the obvious place to upgrade, but there are no upgrades available, short of trying to blow the Braves or Dodgers away with some offer, which doesn't make sense.
Still, getting a McCann offers more of an incremental upgrade than Tex, I'd think. In pure dollar terms, and this is way out there, they could have tried something like (roughly) Buchholz, Lugo, $18M, and another top prospect for McCann, then sign Lowe/Burnett. Their rotation would be improved, their offense would be better than if they sign Tex, they'd spend less money over the next 4/5 years, AND have no long-term commitment to Tex.
What do you think about that?
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 09:37 AM
I think teix wud shift to the outfield and drew/ellsbury would sit if that were to happen
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Ortiz would stay on the bench in a World Series, it was an easier decision in the past to play him since he was better then the options at 1B.
Posted by: TJ Sox Fan | December 16, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Lowell is a top 5 defense 3b. I dunno why that's an LOL
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:39 AM
It hit me a few days ago. If they sign Tex, they will have
1B: Tex
3B: Youk
DH: Ortiz
In two years I believe Ortiz becomes a free agent. This is the ETA of 1B power hitting prospect Lars Anderson. This could result in the sox parting ways with Ortiz, and sliding Lars Anderson into Ortiz's role, except he can actually play 1B, and backup TEX unlike Ortiz.
That would also no longer make is necessary to have a Sean Casey 1B backup on the team, as Anderson would fill in that position.
Let's face it, Anderson is a prospect due to his hitting, not his fielding. If he can get hit 3-4 at bats everygame, who cares if he even plays the field.
Posted by: localhost | December 16, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Ortiz wud never ride bench in the series. That's one way to get him to waive notrade heh
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 16, 2008 at 09:41 AM
Point definitely taken about the OBP difference between Lowell and Tex. Also I've neglected to consider the cost of Lowell. What is he at - $13M per year? He probably actually has negative value right now.
So yeah, as long as the Sox are ok with the long-term commitment, then signing Tex could make sense.
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 09:41 AM
Sox are going after 1 player b/c that is all they need. What do you think they would do if they didn't have Beckett and Dice-K? When they lost in 2006, did they also went after one player?
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 16, 2008 at 09:41 AM
BoBo, I sure hope your not refering to Brian McCann and coming to Boston with If your are that is the most idiotic thing I have ever heard.... Boston would have to give up soooooooo much to get him from ATL.... I think you need to be a little more realistic, like resigning Varitek...
Posted by: fearthechant | December 16, 2008 at 09:43 AM
"During the season, with Lowell/Youk/Teixeira the Sox can rotate these 3 and provide extra days off to all of them, ensuring they all stay healthy all year."
I think the likely rotation would be with Ortiz/Lowell/Youk.
Age is catching upto Lowell and Ortiz and Youk generally fades late in seasons so extra rest for him wouldnt be bad either.
Also Youk can be your backup 1B obviously and also be available as a emergency corner OF.
This allows the team to give players a day off without having to take a significant hit with the quality of the lineup.
Posted by: TJ Sox Fan | December 16, 2008 at 09:43 AM
"i hate it when fans complain about teams that spend money, dont get mad at other teams just because your owners never pony up money or because other teams can always offer more, fire your executives, but nobody likes a whiner."
Lol! You sound like a Yankee fan.
Posted by: docgonzo | December 16, 2008 at 09:44 AM
With Teixeira, its mind boggling to think that Jason Bay or JD Drew would likely be the Red Sox #7 hitter.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 16, 2008 at 09:44 AM
bobo,
I don't feel the Sox necessarily NEED to trade Lowell. They were in the same situation a few years back with too many corner IF/DH types....they were just much cheaper.
As far as the difference in Lowell and Tex is, who as an opposing team would you fear more? The Sox didn't have that "fear factor" in the playoffs which over the better part of this decade had come from Manny.
Defense....Youk worked his ass off to be an elite Gold Glove caliper first baseman since his move across the diamond. He has great work ethic it seems and I don't think it would be too much of a drop off from Lowell who is now getting into his mid-30's.
So all in all, as a Sox fan....I say sign him. It may go against what we have been doing as far as free agents over the past few years but if they continue to produce young talent like they have then "overpaying" one player should even out.
Posted by: turnthe2 | December 16, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Well, what would be realistic to get McCann? Buchholz, a free Lugo, Masterson, and Ellsbury? More? Less?
I didn't realize how long McCann was signed for. You're right. He may be one of the most valuable properties in baseball.
What if it were Buchholz, Lugo, $20M, Masterson, Ellsbury, and Anderson?
Do you make that trade if you're the Sox? What if you're the the Braves?
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 09:49 AM
I would love to see Yankee-Red Sox play 162 games per year against eachother. ESPN would always have something to talk about and they could have their own little championship. Those of us that are interested in one of the other baseball teams could get actual media coverage and compete with payrolls under $100 mil.
Posted by: OmegaMan | December 16, 2008 at 09:50 AM
"Lol! You sound like a Yankee fan."
maybe, but i never complained about their payroll ever either. its not really a big issue, big contracts dont imply success and people have to start accepting that.
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 09:55 AM
"Lars anderson will take over as dh when ready. I can't link post cause I'm on phone, but will get that for u wen I get home. Theo and francona have both spoken of him a dh"
Isn't Lars supposed to start playing some corner OF some his upcoming season and didn't he play a few games this past season to attempt to learn it some also? Would give some flexability if he could become a corner OF if Sox do sign Tex and have 2, when Anderson projects into a Tex type player.
Got to agree with Lowell being superior 3b over Youk, his range may have slipped a tad, but the guy is a vacuum cleaner at 3b...
Posted by: johns | December 16, 2008 at 09:58 AM
"What if it were Buchholz, Lugo, $20M, Masterson, Ellsbury, and Anderson?
Do you make that trade if you're the Sox? What if you're the the Braves?"
No. McCann is disgustingly desirable for a lineup card, but he's not worth that much. Santana wasn't able to net that much value and there's no argument that Santana is the more valuable player. I wouldn't even trade that for Joe Mauer, who's far and away the best catcher in the entire MLB. That would be the definition of mortgaging the future. They'd be creating three holes in their roster to fill one.
Posted by: 0bsessions | December 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM
I can't imagine the Braves trading McCann after trading their best minor league catcher in Tyler Flowers for Vazquez. They would definitely get some nice players by dealing McCann, but put themselves in the same situation that the Sox are in.
Posted by: Eric | December 16, 2008 at 10:16 AM
I would like to see Lowell retained as a 3rd base backup and learn to play 1st in ST if the Sox do sign tex instead of being traded away. Boston would probably have to eat some of his salary anyway and they could more than likely get him 300+ AB's rotating him between 1b,3B and DH that way if Lowell would go along, would give them one of the best pinch hitters in the game also, Mikey rarely strikes out and has an excellent eye at the plate.
Posted by: johns | December 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM
Ken Rosenthal will be on the weei in boston after 12:00 pm eastern.
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 16, 2008 at 10:26 AM
johns - lars did not play any OF this year.
there has not been any chatter of him playing a corner OF position. the red sox are chock full of corner outfielders in the minor leagues.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:30 AM
I'm sorry all I want to say here is Tex is not worth more than 20 a year...all your paying for is defense in the first half, and an amazing bat with defense the second half...until he can stay his 2nd half form for the whole year he does not deserve more than 20-21 at most, def not A-Rod money...
Posted by: bartendermlb | December 16, 2008 at 10:37 AM
notice how the "decision is close to being made" now that the sox threw down, coincidence?
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 10:39 AM
"there has not been any chatter of him playing a corner OF position. the red sox are chock full of corner outfielders in the minor leagues."
Thanks for the info on Lars, thought read that they were planning on turning him into a corner OF.
The only top corner OF prospects currently above AA are Reddick, Daeges and Kalish. Is there someone that is flying under the Radar? I miss it since they had a "A" ball team here in Winter Haven all those years ago and more sources...
Posted by: johns | December 16, 2008 at 10:40 AM
alot of people seem to be balking at the idea of tex getting 25MM per...
let's keep in mind that while salaries have seemed to level off somewhat over the last 3 years prior to that they had skyrocketed...
it is conceivable that if tex is getting 25MM per he could actually be underpaid in years 5-8 of the deal.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:40 AM
Will this increase the price on Dunn? I can see the Angels going for Dunn if they miss on Tex
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 16, 2008 at 10:43 AM
04F - the only coincedence is that there were 4 teams to be rumored that were intersted with 1 not submitting a bid yet.
wouldnt tex have to have all the offers before making a decision?
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM
people who think tex isnt worth 20-23 million a year are crazy, with inflation in five years, and when pujols signs a contract second to the size of the nation debt, its not gonna be considered much. people thought the manny rameriz deal looked crazy for its time, it was amazing for the team, which is why he hated it so badly
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Boston, Boston, Boston. The Sox can win the W.S. The Angels can not.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | December 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM
"it is conceivable that if tex is getting 25MM per he could actually be underpaid in years 5-8 of the deal. "
You're not factoring in he'll be at age 33-37 through those years and likely be in the declining phase of his career where he'll be a middle of the road 1B and hence be egregiously overpaid.
Posted by: Teetz1 | December 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Just to be clear, I wasn't suggesting the Braves actually would trade McCann. It was just an example of a _type_ of trade, combined with the signing of an SP that might make more sense for the Sox than a Tex signing. That's all.
I disagree that Santana was worth more than McCann. McCann is signed until 2013 at an absolute bargain basement rate. Santana was signed for one year. McCann's value is light years beyond what Santana's was last year.
He's making $36M over the next 5 years. He'd easily get $80M or maybe even $100M for 5 years as an FA. You're talking about a ~60 million dollar profit, and there are very few, if any players that you can say that about.
The only ones that immediately come to mind are Longoria, maybe Pedroia, and depending on how you think they'll end up performing, some unproven players like Justin Upton, Bruce, etc. The list is short.
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM
johns - che-hsuan lin is very highly regarded and i've heard positive things about jason place as well.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM
"notice how the "decision is close to being made" now that the sox threw down, coincidence?"
my thoughts exactly. Though it doesnt mean he is chosing the Red Sox. The best offers are probably in, now its up to Teixeira.
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | December 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM
EWS1532
no i dont personally think so, boras knew the sox where the ultimate target because of the hard one the team has for him. this is the biggest deal or is going to be an insult to boras for him trying to jerk the team around with the price tag. either way, this offer is the match to the gasoline
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM
If you see an inappropriate comment please shoot me an email at dierkes@gmail.com and I will remove it.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | December 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM
The Sox can pay Tex 25 mil easy!
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | December 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM
I don't think the Manny deal was amazing by any stretch. Remember that halfway through it the Sox were willing to give him away for free and nobody bit.
By the end, he may have been worth a few million more than he was paid. But look - he went to LA, played out of his mind, and still can't find anyone to pay him more than Boston did on anything more than a 2 year deal.
In 5 years, Tex will be paid the market rate at best. He'll be declining. The reason you give him 8 years is because he can demand that, not because you WANT him for this age 34-36 seasons or whatever.
Posted by: bobo | December 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Kramerica Industries
correct, thank you for helping me explain it
Posted by: 04Forever | December 16, 2008 at 10:48 AM
Everyone should
1) lay off personal attacks, lets just talk baseball
2) get over the fact that the yankees, cubs, mets, bosox, and until recently, apparently, dodgers have tons of money to spend
I grew up in Pittsburgh and central Minnesota. I haven't seen my pirates field anything close to a competetive team in 15 years. Small market teams know what they have to do to be successful: look at the Twins, A's, and Marlins. Scout well, develop your guys, sell high when you can get max value back and do it again in another 4 to 7 years.
It's pointless to bitch about big money teams landing superstars and the majority of type FAs. Its just the reality of the game and, I think, it makes it much more interesting when you have teams like the A's and Twins making the playoffs and teams like the Royals and Orioles getting better.
Posted by: my poor buccos | December 16, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Since when did Ravech become an expert on anything? He reads a teleprompter.
Posted by: jaydestro | December 16, 2008 at 10:51 AM
teetz - i understand where you're coming from and you bring up a very good point. with that in mind i still think there's a handful of players who do age well. i think tex will be one of those guys.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:53 AM
FWIW, between 2004-2008, Youkilis has played 154 games at 3rd and made 14 errors total. Lowell played 154 games in 2007 and made 15 errors. I think Youk can handle the hot corner just fine. If you recall, he is a converted 3rd baseman.
Posted by: Mrs_Thompson's_Boy | December 16, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Karl Ravech obviously failed math.
“If you’re looking at eight years, $180 million, you’re north of $18 million a year"
Go ahead Karl...we'll give you another chance to do that problem. 180 over 8 years is 22.5 numbskull.
Posted by: uncannymanny | December 16, 2008 at 10:55 AM
04F - you and i are in agreement that we think tex will wind up with the sox but i dont think its a big secret that boras wants to get in john henry's wallet on this one.
bobo - the reason the sox wanted to trade manny had nothing to do with his performance and everything to do with his character.
i suppose its possible tex goes crazy like manny but its unlikely. the manny ramirez we all know and love, i think (i hope), is a character we will all see once in a lifetime.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:56 AM
great point Mrs. T's Boy - he beat me to the punch.
Posted by: EWS1532 | December 16, 2008 at 10:57 AM
"
Karl Ravech obviously failed math.
“If you’re looking at eight years, $180 million, you’re north of $18 million a year"
Go ahead Karl...we'll give you another chance to do that problem. 180 over 8 years is 22.5 numbskull."
North means greater than. 22.5>18. Good job critiquing a true statement.
Posted by: gfulla | December 16, 2008 at 11:00 AM
"i suppose its possible tex goes crazy like manny but its unlikely. the manny ramirez we all know and love, i think (i hope), is a character we will all see once in a lifetime."
I will go on rtecord saying the chances of Tex pulling a "Manny" at any point in his career, no matter what team he is on...are ZERO and NONE!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 16, 2008 at 11:01 AM