![]() |
|
|
| |
« Correia, Padres Reach Minor-League Deal | Main | Rays Sign Joe Nelson »
4:01pm: Peter Gammons of ESPN writes the Yankees are just being American.
1:26pm: FOXSports.com's Dayn Perry believes the Yankees are taking a risk with the Teixeira deal. Perry points out that the Yankees' spending will add even more pressure onto the franchise to win. He also thinks the Yankees needed to make this deal.
Former pitcher Jim Kaat is in line with Perry. Kaat believes there will be an adjustment period for all three of the Yankees' big signings. He writes that players sometimes try too hard to live up to their big contracts in the first season, and that could take place here.
Murray Chass says Mark Teixeira banned himself from Boston.
11:33am: Add Rays skipper Joe Maddon to the list of baseball people who aren't scared by the Yankees' recent moves. This, via Mike DiGiovanna and the LA Times.
10:01am: Since this is the major topic today -- unless anything breaks -- I'll update this periodically.
8:49am:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053697df3e970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More Mark Teixeira Signing Reactions:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
haha 1st this so stupid how every1 thinks this bad for baseball and everything when these are the non rules of baseball and any1 from the royals to the yanks can do this but they don't
Posted by: yanksfan4ever | December 24, 2008 at 08:52 AM
He cites the national economic struggles as a top reason the Teixeira/Yankees deal is makes no sense.
Mike Lupica of the N.Y. Daily News wonders if the Yankees have spend enough this offseason to buy a World Series.
Welcome, new guy. Proofread your stuff before posting, lol. Merry Christmas!
Posted by: Cinco Ocho | December 24, 2008 at 08:57 AM
Hasn't become much younger? they traded Mussina, Pettite, and Giambi (40,36,36) for Burnett, Sabathia, and Teixiera (32, 28, 28)
Posted by: ECT | December 24, 2008 at 09:00 AM
while I do agree that it is fully within any team's right to spend whatever they want, it still doesn't mean it's in the best interest of the game itself. I know I'm not the only fan who thinks that when any major free agent comes up, they are either going to Boston or New York, and that's it. It just takes the fun out of things for other teams. Now, I'm a diehard Braves fan, so I know I don't have it that bad, because at least they tried to toss some $ around, just didn't work out(though I am estatic they did not sign A.J. Burnett for that kind of $- good luck with that one). It just seems that there are only a few teams that are major free agent players every year, and I honestly think it's bad for the league. I understand the Yanks are paying $20 mil+ in luxury taxes, which is fine, but what actually bothers me the most is that the Yanks can make a bad signing (Carl Pavano, Jared Wright, etc) and it doesn't kill them because they seem to have a bottomless pit of $. If my Braves, for example, paid big $ for a guy and it didn't work out (Mike Hampton anyone?), the salary ramifications truly hinder the organization's ability to add any additional pieces they would like. The Yanks don't have that problem, and can easily eat a bad contract if necessary. THAT is why many baseball fans want to see the Yanks fail, and since the days of Brosius, Charlie Hayes, Sojo, etc...you know...ROLE players, the Yanks have not won anything with a team of superstars and their bloated salaries, and that makes fans of other teams happy! I also know the Yanks are supposedly cutting salary and may in fact have a smaller overall payroll than last year, but in 2008 they spent over $70 million more than the next closest team! So...in my eyes, and many others, it DOES look like they are trying to simply buy another World Series ring, and many fans don't like that and want nothing more than to see them fail!
Posted by: Larry Wayne Jones | December 24, 2008 at 09:04 AM
Yeah they haven't become younger at all:
Mussina/40 vs Sabthia/28
Pettitte/37 vs Burnett/32
Giambi/37 vs Teixeira/29
Abreu/35 vs Swisher/28
Avg age/37 vs Avg age/29
Great reporting...
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 09:10 AM
It's not about BUYING a WS... its about giving your team the best chance to do it.. Yankees did what they felt was necessary to be able to achieve that goal.. Yanks cant build through the draft if they cant get a top10 pick.. unless they tank a few seasons to do it..
Yankees' payroll hasnt gone up people.. its gone down.
Posted by: dapoktan | December 24, 2008 at 09:15 AM
The payroll has gone down...for now. They just added $62 million with CC, AJ, and Tex, and you know they are not done. If their payroll in 2009 is actually lower than 2008 when the season starts, then you have a point, but I'm betting that it won't be THAT much lower. Still going to be $50 mil higher than anyone else!
Posted by: Larry Wayne Jones | December 24, 2008 at 09:20 AM
I love how the media is spinning things for Boston to make it sound as if they "drew a line" and didn't want to cross it. They drew a line and didn't want too cross it because they had no idea that there were any teams, other than then maybe the Nationals, that had an offer in. Why compete against yourself when you feel your offer (money and competitiveness) are the best on the table? Cashman played it well. He knew that Boras would probably offer him one last chance to beat any existing offer and they did so by an avg salary increase of $1.5 mil per year. Since when has any team with the media coverage as big as the Yanks ever been able to keep something like this quiet? That indicates to me that it happened at the very last minute. The Yanks probably had internal talks about Tex or Man-NY and had an idea of what they were willing to pay for either of them. If Boras called and the figure were too high they would've passed. If Boston signed Tex I GUARANTEE you the Yanks would've pounced all over Man-NY.
I know Man-NY is probably on his flight back from Brazil saying WTF??? Luccyyyyy (Boras)!!!!!! What did ju do????!!!!!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 09:21 AM
If you look at Yanksfanssince78's comment, you can see the players that the Yankees have lost.. It's reasonable to think that they would go out and replace these players..
I'm surprised people are outraged..
Posted by: dapoktan | December 24, 2008 at 09:25 AM
I'm a Red Sox fan, and have no problem defending the Yankees here.
While the Yanks are obviously a better team going into next year, they are also deeply committed to next years core roster for the next 5-8 years.
What people should remember is the Yankees overspending makes it very difficult to find trades for their players if they don't work out.
These players are all great but there is no gurantee for the Yankees other then the fact that they will have to honor these contracts for a very long time.
Other franchises who don't lock into big contracts like this will have a ton of flexibilty over the course of the next decade.
If you think this is nonsense just look at Giambi/Pavano and how these bad contracts hurt the Yankees for the better part of this decade already.
The Reward of these players is all people focus on but if fans took their frustration away for a second they would see the Risk is extremely large too.
The only thing that upsets me with this situation is the lack of rules in place to protect the Brewers/Blue Jays from being the ones who are penalized for this.
With all the sandwich picks, and the Yankees 3rd round pick being extremely late, the Blue Jays are basically ending up with a 4th round pick for the loss of a Type A free agent.
To put this in perspective, if some team signs Jason Varitek the Red Sox will get a 1st round pick for Tek while the Brewers get a 2nd round for Sabathia.
The ranking system and compensation system should change but other then that its all good by me.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 24, 2008 at 09:28 AM
I don't think ourtraged really, just fed up that the major free agent's always seem to only have 2 or 3 possible teams that can ever afford them, and that's why people LOVE to see the Yankees fail
Posted by: Larry Wayne Jones | December 24, 2008 at 09:29 AM
Ben Jones,
Where exactly does Sherman's column suggest that the Yankees aren't getting younger...?
"Don't ignore age as a factor in this. Teixeira turns 29 in April. Last year, the Yanks spent too much of the season depending on the too inexperienced and the too old. But since the start of last year, they have added Xavier Nady, who will play next season at 30; Nick Swisher, who will play next season at 28; CC Sabathia, who turns 28 in July; and A.J. Burnett, who turns 32 in two weeks.
This gives them significantly more players in their prime, and should be of great benefit if Robinson Cano Robinson Cano , 26, bounces back from a poor season; Chien-Ming Wang Chien-Ming Wang , 29 in March, returns to 19-win health; and Joba Chamberlain Joba Chamberlain , 23, can avoid the DL.
The Yanks suddenly have a lot more players who could be considered near or in their prime."
And to YanksFanSince78, before you rail on the reporting, please read the article to make sure that the synopsis posted here actually matches what the reporter said... Merry Readingcomprehensionmas!
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | December 24, 2008 at 09:30 AM
I'm going to hire some high school kids to begin a grass roots campaign here in Cleveland. Bring Man-NY Home..Bring Man-NY Home...Bring Man-NY home..
The Indians should blow the banks open and give him 2/50. They've done nothing to address their offense this year. Hafner is no guarantee to return back to the 35 hr/100 rbis guy next year and Victor Martinez hit 2 hrs all year w/ a .335 obp and I still don't trust Choo-Choo, Garko and Shoppach to put up the same numbers as last year. After the horrible season the Browns and the Indians have had the Cavs completely own sports radio. Signing Man-NY would be the kind of move that would excite fans and drive ticket sales. Give the fans and players something to be excited about Dolan!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 09:31 AM
The yankees overspending doesn't necessarily hurt them, because they can eat big contracts and still spend on someone else! they already had giambi, pavano, etc. making huge $ and still signed A-rod! tell me one other team that can do that!
Posted by: Larry Wayne Jones | December 24, 2008 at 09:32 AM
Fine lets give the Yankees the Royals finances and vise versa. Then we'll see just how many millions the Yankees spend.
Here's a hint, They wouldn't be involved for any of the players they just signed.
No owner is going to spend far more money then their team brings in.
The Yankees are able to do it for one reason and one reason only their fan base pulls in a extreme amount of money, I fully believe they could have a 400 million dollar payroll and still make money.
Baseball needs to have 100% revenue sharing with rules for how the money is used or have a massive luxuary tax that no team could really afford to ignore.
Something like 50% of everything over 125 million.
Baseball is played in cities other then NY, LA, and Chicago. Its not the birthright of these cities to go to the playoffs.
Baseball needs to get back to the point where it was the best ran teams that made the playoffs and not the teams with the biggest pocket books. And yes I know that spending money doesn't equal playoffs but if you spend and spend well its pretty much like printing playoff tickets.
Baseball was at its best once the draft was instituted, but before Free Agency. From the mid-60's to the mid 70's even into the early 80's.
Really it wasn't bad bad till the contracts started to spike in the early 90's
Now the league is at a point where only a handful of teams can afford the top talent without putting their teams into a hole. Basically you don't want one player making more then a quarter of the payroll.
Posted by: schellis | December 24, 2008 at 09:32 AM
kangaroo:
I agree w/ you to an extent but they also get a sandwhich pick which should put them somewhere between 30-45 overall.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 09:34 AM
YanksFan78,
The media is pretty annoying with this stuff. Its probably the reason so many other fans hate Sox/Yank fans more then anything else. I've always found true Sox/Yank fans can actually get along because they are capable of having an intelligent conversation about their teams because both are alos knowledgeable about all the other teams as well.
Every team has bandwagon fans and the best part of Teixeira signings with the Yanks is how many of the Sox bandwagon fans will be jumping back on your ship. Maybe it will make Sox fans seem less annoying some how.
Also a Sox fan I am okay with the Sox not going higher. They got involved in a game of high stakes poker, called Boras's bluff and lost.
"Sometimes you eat the bar, and sometimes, well, he eats you"
I'd probably be more upset if the Sox just kept bidding against themselves; especially because its not like I consider Mike Lowell some terrible hole that they needed to replace.
The offensive production upgrade of Teixeira over Lowell is obvious but it wouldn't be nearly as much if they upgraded the actual holes of SS/Catcher and maybe even CF in their lineup instead.
Manny was a bigger bat then Jason Bay, but on about 20 MLB teams Jason Bay is still a cleanup hitter and for the Sox he hits 6th, so its not like the Sox have a bad lineup.
People are just upset because the Yanks signed all the big name guys at 1 time, but thats how it happens when you give a bunch of guys long term contracts you can't deal away.
In 8 years from now the Yanks are gonna do it again when Teixeira/Sabathia/ARod come off the books.
Yanks are just on a different cycle then other teams. They do it all at once, other spread it out over various seasons.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 24, 2008 at 09:45 AM
My apologies to Mr. Sherman...Get on your j-o-b Mr. Ben Jones, your post was misleading... :)
Ps. There's no way I would trade Wang, regardless of whether or not Pettitte signs. The whole point of signing CC and AJ is to provide depth to the staff with proven talents. Every great team has a good 1-3 combo. Joba and Hughes are not locks at this point to provide anything in 09. If they each have good years (Joba and Hughes) and guys like Brackman or Betances or even Kennedy have super 09's then maybe you listen to offers in winter of 09-10, especially if someone's talking young position players(OF, SS) but not this year!!
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Kangaroo: that was a refreshing post. thanks for the input.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Schellis,
I disagree. Overspending by a few teams has led to great strides in the development of players at younger levels.
The more teams pull away with payroll, the more other teams are forced to invest in player development.
If you go back to the 60/70/80's before salaries spiked the developmental leagues were poor and the opportunity to make it to the major league level was low.
Now, more and more younger kids are getting a chance to move up and prove their talent on a big stage. Last year alone numerous kids came up and helped their teams by filling in holes, where as in the past teams would have just swapped one lousy vet for another.
I also think the emphasize on development is playing a huge part in the resurgance of the quality of MLB because you are seeing the Veterans working harder then ever before to keep their jobs.
Posted by: KangarooBoxer26 | December 24, 2008 at 09:51 AM
"Baseball was at its best once the draft was instituted, but before Free Agency. From the mid-60's to the mid 70's even into the early 80's."...schellis
thats your opinion. actually financially baseball is at its best right now. why would baseball change anything, it is a business and it is good for business to have the yankees good. these moves do not guarantee anything...but it s makes the yankees a great draw and that isn't bad.
Posted by: ncyankeefan | December 24, 2008 at 09:53 AM
I don't know why everyone says this is such a big blow to boston. We have a championship caliber team already. I dont think this is bad for boston at all. It guarantees they sign that extention for Youk, it puts us on the market for Holliday.
The Yankees signing Teix is bad for the REST of baseball except the red sox. I still think we are going to win 95-99 games and possibly the division. This is bad for teams like the nationals, orioles and brewers who lost out on major parts of their rotation/lineup. As a reminder once again, the Red Sox looked at Teix as a bonus. nothing more.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 24, 2008 at 09:55 AM
At this point they might as well sign manny whether they can trade matsui or not. Right now i think if they offered manny 3/60-66 he'd have to take it.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 24, 2008 at 09:56 AM
the yankees that is.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 24, 2008 at 09:56 AM
1b: Youkilis/Teixeira (Teix by a small margin)
2b: Pedroia/Cano (pedroia by a longshot)
ss: jeter/lowrie (jeter by small margin at this point in his career)
3b: arod/lowell (arod)
LF: damon/bay (i'd take bay but pretty equal)
cf: ellsbury/cabrera (ellsbury by a longshot)
RF: Drew/nady (pretty even)
c: posada/varitek (tek due to health, posada's shoulder is shot, i dont expect a return to .330 avg.)
rotation:
beckett / sabathia (neck and neck, i take beckett especially in the playoffs)
dice-k / burnett (i'd take dice-k for health reasons tho burnett is more dominant when healthy)
lester / wang (Lester. please dont start this argument again yankee fans. Lester is far better (lookin forward at his career) AND a lefty. There is really no argument.)
wakefield / hughes (wake UNTIL hughes proves otherwise. Long term i take hughes obviously)
bucholz/masterson/bowden / chaimberlain/pettite: i give joba/andy the advantage, but not by much. andys era was too inflated last year.
really the two teams are still VERY competitive if u look player for player. Teixeira would have sealed the deal for Boston, but this will make for a more enjoyable season, and i hardly think theo is sitting around licking his wounds.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | December 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM
I think that that signing was not good for baseball as a whole. So much for talks of little disparity in baseball.
Don't get me wrong. It's a great signing for the Yankees. They had the money to do it, it improved their defense, gave them more offense, and pushes Swisher/Matsui as a depth guy who can sub in everywhere.
But as good as it is for the Yankees, like I said, it's not good for the rest of baseball. "Small market" teams like the Nats or even O's lose out in adding a guy who brings fans to the park and improve revenue, not to mention to improve a lousy team, while a good team like the Yankees (lets face it, even without Teixeira, they are still in the upper echelon of baseball teams in the league) get even better. So the poor get poorer...
Selig needs to add in 100% revenue, like someone mentioned, to help "smaller market" teams to actually stay competitive. The salary cap idea would be an extreme, as baseball wouldn't be baseball with a salary cap. No Evil Yankees, no Big Bad Red Sox... I know people would argue that you don't need a huge payroll to be very competitive (Twins, Marlins, Rays come to mind), but I say bullsquat. To win it all, you need to have money, and thats what makes it harder for teams like the Padres, A's, Royals to win it all, especially since athletes go where the money is (see Sabathia, CC, et al), which leaves small market teams to hang out to dry.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | December 24, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Albeit a nuissance, the Yanks are not bad for the sport. You can't just buy titles; that's been proven. Besides, without Goliath, David would just be some punk ass kid with a slingshot. For every "small market" fan crying about spending there is a different type of "small market" fan looking forward to their team whoopin Goliath's ass.
Posted by: aj7380 | December 24, 2008 at 10:18 AM
why dont the yankees just buy other baseball teams? isnt that a better way of insuring that you win?
Posted by: 04Forever | December 24, 2008 at 10:18 AM
"It's not about BUYING a WS... its about giving your team the best chance to do it.."
It's about BUYING a World Series, period!!!!
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Yes and let's not forget that the worst run team in professional sports has spent three quarters of a billion dollars over three years and has only two playoffs wins for it. They are desperate to BUY a World Series so they and their fans do not look totally foolish.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 10:26 AM
"why dont the yankees just buy other baseball teams? isnt that a better way of insuring that you win?"
Nah, I'd rather they just buy the Dominican Republic and Japan.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 10:30 AM
"Yes and let's not forget that the worst run team in professional sports has spent three quarters of a billion dollars over three years and has only two playoffs wins for it. They are desperate to BUY a World Series so they and their fans do not look totally foolish."
The comments just keep getting better and better!
The goal of any owner of a professional sports team is twofold..to make money and to win. The Yankees have done that better than any other team. If that is "worst run" Ill take it everyday of the week.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 10:31 AM
Iron Nat,
Your just an idiot...
Posted by: mRyAnkEe1231 | December 24, 2008 at 10:37 AM
OH and Phil Sheridan,
Shut The Fuxk UP!!!
The Yankees are bad for baseball? Didn't your team win the world series? Why the hell are you complaining? It's people like this who overlook the fact that our current payroll is DOWN!!! You want me to say it in spanish? ABAJO!!! Smaller market teams have no shot oh please... Sheridan is just mad that the Phils feasted on a small market team and now is afraid that if their team reaches the World Series they will have to contend with the Yankees or another High Payroll team Like Boston!
(not trying 2 disrespect Phils Fans)
Posted by: mRyAnkEe1231 | December 24, 2008 at 10:41 AM
"I don't know why everyone says this is such a big blow to boston. We have a championship caliber team already. I dont think this is bad for boston at all. It guarantees they sign that extention for Youk, it puts us on the market for Holliday."
I agree. And I really don't care for the Sox. Here's my outsider look at the lineup, offensively and defensively.
Youk/Teixeira- Teixeira, but by not as much as people make it out to be.
Pedroia/Cano- Pedroia, and its not even close
Lowrie/Jeter- Lowrie is very unproven, but if he improves with the bat and maintains his glovework, I might have to call this even. Right now it goes to Jeter though.
Lowell/A-Rod- A-Rod and its not even close
Bay/Damon- Bay. Both are meh defensively, and Bay's the better hitter and in his prime.
Ellsbury/Cabrera/Swisher- Ellsbury wins regardless of whether Cabrera or Swisher plays CF. Swisher is a 1B/corner OF, and his defense at CF is sub par (he was only forced into the position by team needs).
Drew/Nady- Depends on way too many factors. Drew's health, and whether 2008 was a fluke or not. I have to call it even.
Ortiz/Matsui- Both are DL favorites, but Ortiz is actually better when healthy.
Pitching: You can organize these so many different ways.
Beckett/Sabathia- CC.
Lester/Burnett- I have to take Lester here. Both are very, very dominant pitchers, but Lester stays healthier.
Dice-K/Wang- Wang.
Wakefield/Pettite- Pettitte, and its not even close.
Buchholz/Masterson/Bowden v. Joba/Hughes/Kennedy - I have to take the Yankees kids here, although anyone could break out.
The Yankees haven't pulled away from the Sox at all.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 24, 2008 at 10:41 AM
1b: Youkilis/Teixeira--Teixeira(ny)
2b: Pedroia/Cano--Pedroia(bos)
ss: jeter/lowrie--Jeter(ny)
3b: arod/lowell--Arod(ny)
LF: damon/bay--Bay(bos)
cf: ellsbury/Gardner--Even
RF: Drew/nady--Even
c: posada--Yankees Red Sox dont even have a catcher as of now(ny)
Yankees 4 Red Sox 2 Ties: 2
Beckett/Sabathia --Sabathia(ny)
Dice-K/Wang-- Wang(ny)
Lester/Burnett--Lester(bos)
Wakefield/Joba--Joba(ny)
Masterson Buchholz Hughes Pettitte--Even
Posted by: mikelovesbaseball94 | December 24, 2008 at 10:48 AM
"Iron Nat,Your just an idiot..."
Let's see, your team averages, with the tax, $200 million a year and haven't won the the World Series in ten years - that seems like $2 billion dollars. Seems like the idiots are in the Yankee front office.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 11:07 AM
Iron
When you see as many world championships from your team in your lifetime that Yankee fans have seen in theirs, come talk to us.
Oh and by the way, if you are going to call someone else an idiot, please learn to count. The Yanks won in 2000, thats not 10 years.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 11:22 AM
ironnat: regardless of the factwe haven't won since 2000 I can say that we've had as many looks each year as any other team. its not the front office that has failed, it's the players. ask the pirates if they wish their owners would spend even a 1/3 of what the Yanks spend. You don't need a Tex or CC to improve their teams. Will they make any moves at all to pick up a cheaper FA like an Abreu or Dunn? I bet you they won't. Research how many small market teams use the revenue money to improve their teams and tell me what the reality is?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 11:24 AM
"When you see as many world championships from your team in your lifetime that Yankee fans have seen in theirs, come talk to us."
The sure sign of a has been - living in the past. I grew up a Yankee fan - went to the stadium many times to see Mantle, Berra, Howard, Maris, Ford etc. Sat in the bleachers and watched double headers when bleacher tickets were $1. Steinbrenner not only ruined the team but ruined baseball.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Im not living in the past...Im not talking about 26, Im talking about just what I have seen in my life.
Life didnt start in 2001 and neither did baseball, no matter how much the haters want to pretend it did.
And if you're old enough to have seen those guys play, I feel for you, because your posts make you seem like youre 12.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM
"And if you're old enough to have seen those guys play, I feel for you, because your posts make you seem like youre 12."
When facts and logic fails the fallback is always name calling. Since 2001 what has the Yankee $2 billion bought? Maybe the need for Yankee fans to revert to living in the past?
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 11:36 AM
YOu are the one calling people you dont even know idiots! You havent provided a logical fact yet.
Again, who decided baseball started in 2001?
The Yanks made the playoffs every year until last year. Granted they didnt win the WS, which goes to show money cant buy a championship. What it buys me is a quality competitive team every year.
The argument about the past is so played out. Maybe if the team you do root for had a past such as the Yanks, you can be proud of it too.
If the past means nothing there wouldnt be a Hall of Fame.
I have been to 6 WS parades in my life, and I'd be willing to bet Ill be at many more. When you can say the same, we will be on even ground. Until then its nothing but sour grapes on your part.
Merry Christmas.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 11:45 AM
First of all I was the one called an idiot by a poster. Second of all none of your arguments are germane to whether or not baseball fans in cities other then New York, Boston, LA or Chicago should have the opportunity to see "a quality competitive team every year." My original post was that the Yankees were poorly run - what would be their chances if they were held to a salary cap? $2 billion without a World Series - what if the playing field was even like in other sports? Do you really think you would ever see a World Series again?
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 11:53 AM
They are run fine based upon the rules in place. I dont know what would be if the rules were different, maybe they would change their way of doing business and do fine, and maybe they wouldnt. They are run they way they are because they can be. If the rules changed, then they would have to change the way they do things.
Your issue as a whole is a valid one, I never said it wasnt. Your blame tho is misplaced. Your blame should be on MLB and the Union who are the only ones that can change the rules. The Yanks do nothing that other teams wouldnt do if they had the means. Its not the Yankees job to police baseball and keep it fair. Its the Yanks job to please their fans, make money and win, all 3 which they do very well.
Seriously, should they not have filled their holes with the best available when they have the money to do so?
Im sorry for you, but Id rather see them spend 400 mil on 3 guys they needed than spend 100 mil and watch the other 3 go into the owners posckets.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Must be the Christmas season - now I have to say you are also right (partly). Blame should be placed on MLB. That being said - the results of decisions made by the Yankee front office has resulted in a competitive team, not a championship caliber team. They should be held accountable by the fans. Teams like Minnesota, Florida, Atlanta put a competitive team on the diamond almost every year with much smaller budgets. A level playing field. like football, hockey and basketball would mandate a team make wise decisions, develop a professional minor league system, and spend their money wisely. Note that the NY Rangers are on top of their division - not based on outspending their rivals, but based on putting together a winning team using all the above criteria - a formula that all other teams in their division could have taken advantage of.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 12:11 PM
KangarooBoxer26,
Just be glad they changed the type B rule. Used to be you got their highest remaining draft pick instead of a sup 1st rounder.
Couple teams been screwed by that before.
Also Yanks fans, i hope you enjoy watching Teix in April....
First 45 days you'll all be screaming about what a terrible signing this is , instead of waiting until Sept to be yelling about A Rod
Posted by: red3biggs | December 24, 2008 at 12:15 PM
They are held accountable, which is why they went out and filled their holes with the best available players.
However, you and I both know the game isnt played on paper, and there are many other factors that go into winning. Sometimes things go right and other times they dont.
The Yanks have a shot every year and I cannot ask for more than that.
I dont buy into the comparing baseball to other sports. Its a different animal with the amount of games and the TV rights. What works for Football and hockey would not necessarily work for baseball.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 12:16 PM
It will work fine for fans of probably 24 out of the 30 MLB teams.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 12:19 PM
Look at it this way the Yankees are "threatening" to sign Manny to a 3 year $75 million contract. $25M a year. Tex around $23M a year. Sabathia $23M a year. Burnett, $16.5M a year (average money a year.) Swisher $5M a year. Already they have spent $51M a year for 3 players and now Manny which will equal $76M? This is a joke. They are ruining the game with their dumb old money. They were -$45M operating income according to Forbes when they did the survey April 2008 and now they are going to be in major MAJOR debt. Another 76M to the debt! They better raise the ticket prices and get full houses every game or they are screwed.
Posted by: Jays #1 | December 24, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Then why hasnt it been implemented?
The Yanks have been "ruining baseball" since they signed Reggie back in the 70's. 30+ years but yet no cap. Why is that?
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 12:24 PM
The NFL busted the union - that is the obstacle.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 12:25 PM
BINGO!!!
So your issue shpuld not be with the Yanks, it should be with the players in general and their union.
Checkmate ;)
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 12:27 PM
And you should hope that sanity never raises it's ugly head and parity comes at last to baseball. If it did I might even look at the Yanks with a less critical eye when I remember Mick, Whitey, Scooter and Yogi.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I would go as far to say that if there was a complete swap in finances between the Royals and the Yankees that the Royals front office would not go as far as the Steinbrenners in spending. And that is because the Steinbrenners have the drive to win, to continue the Yankee tradition of excellence. Its not about spending money...its about extending the greatest franchise in sports history.
This is why the team had its power transferred to Hal instead of Hank (because Hank would make it a circus show, while Hal is an honorable guy who understands tradition). This is why the team gave Texaira a 8 year deal instead of giving a goon like Man-NY 3 years and have to wonder if the guy will show up to spring training with a hair cut or not. The Yankees care about winning the right way, and giving back to their fans, which is why I am thankful I grew up a Yankee fan.
It is not a coincidence that once a player comes to the Bronx, playing anywhere else will never be the same. That is the magic of this franchise.
"I thank god every day I'm a Yankee"
Posted by: yanks09 | December 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM
"And if you're old enough to have seen those guys play, I feel for you, because your posts make you seem like youre 12."
When facts and logic fails the fallback is always name calling. Since 2001 what has the Yankee $2 billion bought? Maybe the need for Yankee fans to revert to living in the past?
____________________________
Iron, nothing is ever guaranteed. The Rays did a great job (losing for 10 years) of stocking draft picks that finally put it all together this year. Did they win? No? What did $2 billion buy us since 2001? 2 trips to the world series and 5 other post-season appearances. I'd rather have a chance every year than no chance at all in the last 15 (see Pirates, Royals).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 12:51 PM
"I'd rather have a chance every year than no chance at all in the last 15 (see Pirates, Royals)."
That is why parity has to come to baseball. The fans for the other 24 teams that are not in the largest markets should have a chance every year. It is nice to see that the owner of the Brewers, Mark Attanasio, is fed up. Other owners hopefully will follow.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 12:57 PM
The owner of the Brewers is fed up because he lost a first round draft pick.
Trust me, he loves the money he gets from the Yanks.
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Iron: If a salary cap were instituted there would also be a salary floor. If that were the case and there were a salary cap of 160 mil and a salary floor of 80 million then how many teams would be able to meet the floor level and how badly of a salary reduction would you see? How much money would come out of the players pockets and back into the owners? Answer me that question please...I'll wait. ANyone?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Iron: Other teams DO have a chance!!! The Yanks haven't won in the last 8 years meanwhile the Rays, Brewers, Twins, Marlins, Padres, D'backs, etc have all had shots at it since. There are glaring difference between MLB and all other sports (draft pick trading, player roster size, non-guaranteed contracts, etc). You can talk about a salary cap but the reality is that it would kill small market teams and lead to contraction.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 01:07 PM
ahhhhh boo yaka!!!! YanksfanSince78 always making sense! I am glad we got to open up our gifts already. Merry Christmas Yanksfansince78
Posted by: yanks09 | December 24, 2008 at 01:09 PM
Here's why Mark Attanasio is full of it. He was willing to pony up 100 mil for CC. Now that CC is off the table why isn't he willing to spend that same 100 mill on other players? Are you telling me CC alone will help win next year but Randy Johnson, Ben Sheets, Brian Fuentes and Adam Dunn wouldn't?
Randy = 1/9 mil
Sheets= 2/26 mil
Fuentes= 3/30
Abreu= 2/28
That's 93 million dollars on 4 major improvements to the team. Plus if he traded Cameron to the Yanks and used the 10 mil from Gagne's expired contract that would give them an additional 20 mil to use or put back in their pocket.
WHY IS HE PUTTING BACK IN HIS POCKET??? In the NL Central, with those additions, they could compete for another couple of years.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 01:13 PM
yanks09: Merry X-mas to you too and to all other fans, even the Yankee haters (Santa will put a lump of coal in your stocking if you don't stop hating). ;)
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 01:15 PM
If hockey isn't contracting then MLB will not contract. If there is a level playing field, with a ceiling and a floor, then it is up to the fan base to determine for the respective owners whether or not they are putting a good product on the field. A competitive product would mean more interest and tickets sold. These cheap skate owners like Peter Angelos wouldn't be able to hide behind their small market status to pocket the cash. As to those that point out that the Yankees haven't won a Series in eight years - that goes to my original post that they are mismanaged by the front office.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 01:20 PM
Iron Nat: That's the whole point!!! Why are people acting as if the Yanks have a 50 man roster and everyone else a 25? We signed 3 guys out of a pool of 150!! If I can't afford to buy a Presedential Rolex, then I don't b*tch about it, I go buy a Tag. A Tag isn't as "flossy" but it still does the same job. Can't afford CC? Ok sign Ben Sheets for 1/10th the cost. Can't afford Teixeira? Ok Abreu will get you .300/.380, 20 hrs, 100 rbis for about 10-12 mil per. If the Pirates can't afford Teixeira then why not a smaller bargain priced star? Instead they keep that money in there pockets. And to make matters worse they do a piss poor job at drafting. the Yankees haven't had a chance at a top 10 pick since the year they drafted Jeter (1992????). The Pirates draft top 10 every damn year since 1980 and only have two mlb stars to show for it (Bonds and Kendall). Stop blaming the Yankees for other teams who are not doing a good job with their teams.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 01:32 PM
Iron Nat: The Yanks are not mismanaged. They have done a poor job in terms of drafting in the past (pre-2005) but a GM's job is to put talent on the field. If a team is good enough to win a division and to make it to the playoffs then it's good enough to WIN a world series. If the 09 team fails then the blame is on the players, coaches and manager, certainly not the GM/FO.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | December 24, 2008 at 01:35 PM
"The Pirates draft top 10 every damn year since 1980 and only have two mlb stars to show for it (Bonds and Kendall). Stop blaming the Yankees for other teams who are not doing a good job with their teams."
Yes there are other teams that are as poorly run as the Yankees.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 01:43 PM
I'm going to sum this up for everyone.
- The Yankees got younger
- They have a lower payroll than last year, even with the 3 biggest Free Agents signed this year
- There are not many great free agents next year, so why wait?
- More contracts are coming off the books next year
- Curt Schilling Weighs in? He hasn't been on a scale since Arizona
- How are the yankees bad for baseball? Just because they have money, but do employ more people than any other team with the YES network, Stadium jobs and careers in the organization
- All yankees haters brainwash themselves to think the yankees are buying World Series... They didn't say all this last year when the yankees had a higher payroll than they do now.... any yankee hater, don't quit your day job, blogging and baseball are not for you. Peter Gammons, you can quit your day job, i thought reporters were not supposed to be corrupt, but lets let Gammons spread the Propaganda. Shout out to www.nomaas.org
Posted by: Joba Da Beast | December 24, 2008 at 01:43 PM
Brewers GM is just mad because they no longer get the Yankees first pick.
If the Yankees are so bad for baseball, why is it that the only time many teams ever sell out is when the Yankees (or Red Sox) come to town?? Hate all you want.. All i have to say is... Yankees are baseball!! NY > every other US state.
P.S. Happy Holidays.
Posted by: BklynJT | December 24, 2008 at 02:06 PM
Tex wife didn't like Boston but she is going to love hearing from her husband what a jerk Girardi is. Tex doesn't know that Girardi is a headcase and reacts very badly when they lose.Good luck Tex next year. You are going to need it with Girardi.
Posted by: terry180 | December 24, 2008 at 02:13 PM
I don't give a F what people think about this move. I know for a fact that if he had sign with the Sox people wouldn't be saying the same things.
Facts are they generate interest and they generate money for the MLB.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 24, 2008 at 02:38 PM
As a Sox fan in NYC, I still get to see Teix play. Now I just won't have to try to deal with the crowds at Sox-Yanks games to do it.
It was interesting to look at the actual numbers that Youkilis and Teixeira put up last year and career avg. over 162 games. Teix is indisputably an upgrade, but the Sox fans who are in panic mode now aren't recognizing what Youkilis does for the team. They're both Gold Glove defenders with plus offense. Teix's is a bigger plus, but the Sox can make up for it in other positions (SS, C).
I don't really agree with the writers who are talking too much about the risk of these long-term contracts. How much risk is there in signing a guy to 1B/DH until he's 36? Not too much, really. It's not like they're giving a 40 year old short stop a 6 year deal.
Having Teix would have been great, but the FO picked a figure and stuck to it. The Yankees picked a bigger figure. That's not a game of chicken you really want to get into, is it? 8/168 becomes 8/180 becomes 8/188 becomes 8/200? No thanks.
Posted by: peterherman | December 24, 2008 at 02:42 PM
Another fact is other teams can increase tickets prices when the Yanks in town. Yanks produce money for them and the other teams.
Posted by: DominicanYanks | December 24, 2008 at 02:45 PM
The NFL is still the best professional sports league. No sport can come close to it right now.
Posted by: nymforlife | December 24, 2008 at 02:49 PM
nobody is bitching about the yankees buying other teams players thru that bull**** luxury tax
Posted by: yankeeswilldoit09 | December 24, 2008 at 02:50 PM
These opposing teams better stop saying that they arent afraid of the Yankees acquisition of Mark Teixeira because as we all know the Yankees arent afraid to make drastic moves and according to many newpapers they are shopping one of their excess outfielders (maybe to pursue Manny?)
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | December 24, 2008 at 02:52 PM
"When you see as many world championships from your team in your lifetime that Yankee fans have seen in theirs, come talk to us."
Yankeegirl49, this is why so many Yankee fans are hated.
Intelligent Yankee fans with class never use that excuse. But ignorant fans like you always use that when someone else beats you in an argument. Honestly I don't think anyone f_ucking cares how many championships the Yankees have won besides Yankee fans like you. The Yankees will never learn. The best way to win is by making small moves involving role players and bringing up players through the minors. How did they win in the 90's? With role players and homegrown talent. Look at the Phillies, they won with Howard, Utley, Hamels, Victorino, J-Roll, and other role players. You can't buy heart and a desire to win.
Posted by: nymforlife | December 24, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Yankees put in $100 million in revenue sharing, they basically pay the marlins, nationals and D-Rays Payrolls... than those teams managers and General Managers have somethign to say... if there was no revenue sharing, and probably no yankees, there would only be 26 teams, inclusing 0 in florida, anyone from florida mad at the yankees.. hang yourself.
Posted by: Joba Da Beast | December 24, 2008 at 03:00 PM
"Yankees put in $100 million in revenue sharing, they basically pay the marlins, nationals and D-Rays Payrolls..."
Very specious argument. If each team had a competitive chance to win revenues would increase. This can easily be seen in the playoff race. If a team remains competitive in the playoff race their attendance remains strong. Conversely, if a low revenue team is theoretically eliminated from contention early in the season they suffer at the gate.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 03:09 PM
Peter Gammons says the Teixeira signing serves as a reminder that there's the Yankees, and there's everyone else.
Nuff said
Posted by: Chubz@postgamepub.com | December 24, 2008 at 03:16 PM
on a business side the Yanks have to provide a better product for their fans. they know for a fact if they dont make the playoffs again theyll lose a lot more than a chance at the WS. theyll lose revenue. if we live in a socialist country then the yanks should return AROD, CC,and Tex to their previous teams. but we live in America and the Yanks as a business has the right to make a better product for their customers/ fans.
Posted by: YanksFAN1027 | December 24, 2008 at 03:20 PM
They can suffer at the gate, sure, but if good players put fans in the standsm put good players on your team. If your not producing good young players, and your no signing any proven players, atleast get better scouts. If young players really help a team succeed, pirates and nationals would be better. No one can deny, the pirates are getting better after so many years, nationals have had a lot of busts in their drafts ever since they become the nationals.
If the smaller market teams were smart, they would trade a lot of their first round draftees for already proven players because their first round draftees could be busts. If they lose at the gates... Tell them to sell the team to Mark Cuban so fans will show up. If you can't afford to put a good team out there... Business 101, cut your losses.
Posted by: Joba Da Beast | December 24, 2008 at 03:28 PM
I don't get why all the other teams are complaining about the Yankees signings. Sure, they have spent a crap load of money on just 3 players but those 3 players would be playing for 5+ years. Long-term investments are seen as foolish and risky but you don’t win by not taking risks. Also, by the time those contracts expire, any other team would be paying just as much as the Yankees have to get the same quality players in short- term contracts.
As to those people complaining about Yankees killing baseball/buying championships, let me ask you this. You are a baseball player, average one, you get two offers, one from a team like the Yankees that will do whatever it takes to win, and the other team whose ownership does not like to spend money in players to improve their team but keep it to himself. Who would you choose, assuming the offers are identical? No brainier I guess. Also, any player wants to get as much money as possible AND to win a championship.
It’s not the Yankees that are running baseball, it’s those owners that are trying to keep all the profits to themselves and complain about teams like the Yankees who do whatever it takes to win. The reason Yankees can afford to have such a high payroll and go after big name players like this off-season is because they have the money to do so. That money comes from all the fans going to the games, publicity, ads, etc.; and guess where does that come from? The players like CC, Tex, Arod, etc.
Wouldn’t it be great if you as a owner keep all the profits and complain about teams with
a higher payroll so that you get a chance to win?
About Phil Sheridan opinion, if you are rich, still have the same income you have had for the past 10 years and the recession isn’t really affecting you, would you really care about your spending? Only the poor to mid class level families should be worrying. You sir, are the one not making any sense.
It’s funny how all these fans and teams are bitching and moaning about the Yankees when you don’t even see the teams with the bad records and low payroll like Marlins and Reds say anything about it. Even the Tigers and the Mariners haven’t said anything and they have a pretty high payroll.
Posted by: Wek | December 24, 2008 at 03:32 PM
Besides, the yankees havent spent more than $420,000,000 yet, they will only be spending slightly less than $63 million on these 3 players... (Annually)... They are not getting $420 million from the yankees until all of their contracts are up, and they finish in pinstripes. Writers are to blame for the remarkable use of saying the yankees spent $400 million dollars, where?... i only see $63 million that these players are owed throughout this year. Which is less than the $88.5 million the yankees have let go. They will wind up trading Matsui, Damon, Swisher or Nady. Damon and Matsui are both owed 13 million, swisher about half and nady 3.35. Either way, with any trade of those 4, the yankees have spent less than $60 million.
Some reason... people don't understand that.
Posted by: Joba Da Beast | December 24, 2008 at 03:36 PM
Joba,
That's because the $400 mil over 8 years invesment is the only thing they can use to try to blame the Yankees for how their teams keep losing year after year.
Posted by: Wek | December 24, 2008 at 03:40 PM
so Teixeira and Boras used the Red Sox to drive up the bidding by other teams, notably the Yankees, when Tex had no intention of going there in the first place? That's business, and probably not unethical, but it doesn't speak well of Tex. If he didn't want to go there, he should have said so from the get-go.
Then again, he's probably just a tool and Boras is calling the shots.
Posted by: nostocksjustbonds | December 24, 2008 at 03:44 PM
"Either way, with any trade of those 4, the yankees have spent less than $60 million.
Some reason... people don't understand that."
People do understand that that is the entire payroll of about two thirds of the teams. The rest of the baseball is fortunate that the Yankee's front office is inept or the rest of baseball would never win another World Series.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 03:45 PM
"Yankeegirl49, this is why so many Yankee fans are hated.
Intelligent Yankee fans with class never use that excuse. But ignorant fans like you always use that when someone else beats you in an argument. Honestly I don't think anyone f_ucking cares how many championships the Yankees have won besides Yankee fans like you. The Yankees will never learn. The best way to win is by making small moves involving role players and bringing up players through the minors. How did they win in the 90's? With role players and homegrown talent. Look at the Phillies, they won with Howard, Utley, Hamels, Victorino, J-Roll, and other role players. You can't buy heart and a desire to win."
Ok, so someone posts this about what they HAVE NOT done:
"Let's see, your team averages, with the tax, $200 million a year and haven't won the the World Series in ten years - that seems like $2 billion dollars. Seems like the idiots are in the Yankee front office."
But Im ignorant for posting WHAT THEY HAVE DONE??? Um, yea ok.
Apparently people do care how many they have won, if they keep bitching about how they do business.
I know why Yankee fans are hated, I dont need you to tell me. In fact I want you to keep having a reason to hate. People dont hate other teams that lose, they hate teams that win all the time.
Oh and by the way...stating that I have seen more championships is not an excuse, its a FACT!
Posted by: yankeegirl49 | December 24, 2008 at 03:45 PM
The NFL is still the best professional sports league. No sport can come close to it right now.
Posted by: nymforlife | December 24, 2008 at 02:49 PM
I agree, espeically considering that NFL teams play about 90% less than MLB games makes it more exciting
It's crazy though with the number of teams that makes the playoffs
Baseball plays 2x as much as hockey and basketball, and 10x as much as football...But it's the professional sport with the fewest teams that make the playoffs. I wish either more teams would make it, or they would shorten the season a little bit
Percentage of teams in the sport which go to the playoffs
NBA- 53%
NHL- 53%
NFL- 38%
MLB- 27%
I just wish more teams would make it....Baseball as I said is twice as long as basketball and hockey, but has half the teams IN the playoffs
Posted by: mike923 | December 24, 2008 at 03:46 PM
i know, but if we didnt buyout giambi, and signed all of last years players to contracts and respent the whole $88.5 million on them, no one would be complaining, because the yankees didn't get better. We got better with less money, Red Sox's luck will run out, and me and Wek are the most knowledgable people on this website.
Posted by: Joba Da Beast | December 24, 2008 at 03:46 PM
How long till all this Teixeira signing talk boils down and dies because its bringing all the dumba.sses over to MLBtr to play.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 24, 2008 at 03:46 PM
I agree, espeically considering that NFL teams play about 90% less than MLB games makes it more exciting
--------------
I meant to say NFL games, not NFL teams
Posted by: mike923 | December 24, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Joba,
That's because the $400 mil over 8 years invesment is the only thing they can use to try to blame the Yankees for how their teams keep losing year after year.
--------------------
Define losing and losing please? As in not winning a World Series? Because there would be 22 other major league teams that would "keep losing" by that definition, if you date back to the Yankees last championship
Posted by: mike923 | December 24, 2008 at 03:48 PM
I wish everyone would stop crying about how much the Jankees spend on the payroll.. it's a fact, they did it, they have done it and have been doing it since 1977, so please GET OVER IT and stop these constant whining posts regarding it that amount to nothing but spam and ruin entire topics.
Posted by: johns | December 24, 2008 at 03:51 PM
The answer is very simple. New rules for determining the standings. Take the amount of wins and divide by the payroll in million dollar increments. Wins per million dollars spent. Yankees last place every year.
Posted by: Iron Nat | December 24, 2008 at 03:53 PM
"How long till all this Teixeira signing talk boils down and dies because its bringing all the dumba.sses over to MLBtr to play."
Wow MelonisRex, don't know how missed your post regarding being fed up with the same exact thing.. Guess we both got fed up at the same time huh?
Posted by: johns | December 24, 2008 at 03:54 PM
How long till all this Teixeira signing talk boils down and dies because its bringing all the dumba.sses over to MLBtr to play.
-----------------
Until Manny signs
Posted by: mike923 | December 24, 2008 at 03:56 PM
The answer is very simple. New rules for determining the standings. Take the amount of wins and divide by the payroll in million dollar increments. Wins per million dollars spent. Yankees last place every year.
---------------
Lmao, that is one of the stupidestt things I've ever heard
Posted by: mike923 | December 24, 2008 at 03:58 PM
So if a team with a $1 million payroll goes 2-160 had a better year than a team with say a $160 million payroll that goes 159-3?
Posted by: mike923 | December 24, 2008 at 04:02 PM
Mike923,
Obviously not not winning a World Series. When I said losing year after year I meant teams like Pirates, Kansas, Washington, San Francisco, San Diego, etc., who do little to improve their team and have a real shot or at least be able to compete within their division and instead just pocket the profits. After losing so many years and having a really low payroll, you would at least be able to get more than a few decent average to above average players with all the saved up money.
Posted by: Wek | December 24, 2008 at 04:04 PM