![]() |
|
|
| |
« Perrotto's Latest: Zambrano, Wolf, Anderson | Main | Baldelli A Fit For Red Sox? »
3:05pm: As expected, Dayton Moore shot this down.
1:38pm: ESPN's Steve Phillips says there's nothing to this rumor.
9:01am: From: Tony Massarotti of the Boston Globe:
According to one National League executive, the Kansas City Royals and Atlanta Braves have had serious discussions about a trade that would send outfielder Jeff Francouer to the Royals for pitcher Zack Greinke. The same source said he believed the teams were close to executing the deal, but that Atlanta was holding up any and all trade discussions until the Braves had a resolution of their pursuit of right-hander A.J. Burnett.
I'd be surprised to see this happen without the Braves adding significant pitching to their offer for Greinke. But in general I am skeptical that anything like this is close, even given the Burnett contingency. We probably would've heard some rumbling from Dave O'Brien, Mark Bowman, Bob Dutton, or Dick Kaegel.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105364ae079970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Francoeur-Greinke Rumor Shot Down:


|
|
I heard the Braves have soured a bit on Francoeur.
Posted by: studio179 | December 09, 2008 at 09:03 AM
This has to be false... Dayton Moore can't be that stupid, can he?
Posted by: Hyro | December 09, 2008 at 09:04 AM
Surprised the Rangers aren't more involved for Greinke - they have been pretty hot for him.
Posted by: dmerandom | December 09, 2008 at 09:04 AM
I'll throw up if the Braves get Greinke.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 09:06 AM
No way this would be straight up...lol.
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 09, 2008 at 09:06 AM
I call BS.
There would be MUCH more going to the Royals than Francoeur. I'm talking Heyward/Hanson/Freeman/Schafer/Escobar types.
Greinke should easily cost more than Peavy.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 09, 2008 at 09:07 AM
I know it's a long shot, but could you imagine the following rotation:
Burnett, Greinke, Jurrjens, Vazquez, Smoltz/Campillo/Morton
YIKES!!!
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | December 09, 2008 at 09:07 AM
There's no way this is going to get done in that present form. The value is just completely different for both players.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 09:07 AM
would love the deal, but there is zero chance of a Frenchy/Grienke swap....Id take a bag of baseballs for Frenchy.
Posted by: csg | December 09, 2008 at 09:07 AM
Not happening... the term royal screwing comes to mind.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | December 09, 2008 at 09:08 AM
It's not that crazy - this is all about potential. Francouer had 1 good year, 1 very good year and one bad year. Greinke has had 1 very good year. Both are cheap for a few more years.
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 09:08 AM
Yeah, if this was remotely possible, Wren should be all over the deal. That said, doesn't seem like even a slight possibility without a huge package going back to KC.
Posted by: William | December 09, 2008 at 09:08 AM
Sounds like Moore's type of player. No OBP with a lot of hype.
The Braves must have much more invested in this trade then Francoeur.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:08 AM
This sounds rather implausible on the surface. There has to be more players involved. Are the Braves going to pick up Guillen's contract, send an SP (Morton?) to the Royals. A straight Francoeur for Greinke trade is IMO very unbalanced.
Posted by: Robin | December 09, 2008 at 09:10 AM
So that would leave the Royals with what now - 8 OF's and 5 1B's? I call shenanigans.
Posted by: jhawk90 | December 09, 2008 at 09:10 AM
The Reds were rumored on Francoeur but the Braves were supposedly reluctant. I guess everyone has a price.
PS Greinke should not cost more than Peavy.
Posted by: davidmp2 | December 09, 2008 at 09:10 AM
"Greinke should easily cost more than Peavy."
Eh. I don't think so. I like Greinke a lot but I don't think his value is touching Peavy's yet.
In addition, wouldn't whoever gets him need to lock him up soon? How many years before he his FA? 2/3?
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 09:11 AM
"Greinke should easily cost more than Peavy."
Posted by: melonis rex | December 09, 2008 at 09:07 AM
I disagree because Peavy is a lot more proven and is undeniably the better pitcher, who is also under team control longer. Now I'm not saying that Francoeur by himself is enough to get a guy of Greinke's calibur. No, it's going to take atleast one top prospect (unfortunately for Braves fans) and some good position players to net Greinke.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | December 09, 2008 at 09:11 AM
If true, it's like Schuerholz never left! Maybe even as team president he is still pulling his con-artist act over other GMs.
Posted by: FanOTheRumors2 | December 09, 2008 at 09:13 AM
Finally some good rumors from the braves. I love frenchy but outfielders are a dime a dozen and Greinke comes cheap. Now we can focus our money on atleast one solid OF veteran and still have money to work the rotation some more. Make this happen.
Posted by: Pierce2378 | December 09, 2008 at 09:14 AM
the fact that the Braves would be waiting to see what happens with A.J. tells me that Guillen would be coming over as well. And there would be a lot that would be going back to KC, but nobody out there knows the Atlanta farm system better than Moore. So I'm sure he has a list of guys that he brought to Atlanta (like Frenchy) that he would like to get.
Posted by: the_eddy | December 09, 2008 at 09:16 AM
I'm going to cry if we loose Frenchy. I love him! But at least we get a stud in Greinke.
Posted by: ChiefTomahawk | December 09, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Francoeur was putrid and players with his talent are a dime a dozen...
Greinke should have as much trade value as just about any young pitcher in baseball.
This rumor would be a steal for the Braves.
Where in the world would they even play Francoeur?
They are overloaded with corner outfielders and infielders....
The Royals are building a Men's Slow Pitch Softball Team...
Posted by: MikeClarke | December 09, 2008 at 09:17 AM
Grienke would NOT cost MORE than Peavy...
He would most likely cost the same. There is a chance that the Braves would trade Escobar and Frenchy for Grienke. Royals would get two regulars for him. I'm sure the Braves would also consider sending a pitching prospect or two.
How is Escobar, Francoeur, Reyes, and Locke?
But back to what I was saying. Two seasons of Zach Greinke isn't going to net Royals fans as much as you think.....
Posted by: NEBravesfan33 | December 09, 2008 at 09:19 AM
This trade would be a very unbalanced trade in favor of the Braves, BUT Jeff Francouer is still very young and had a bad season last year, but the year before and a great season. Zach Grienke on the other hand isn't all that great. Yes, he's young, but he's got mental issues and isn't always in the game. If the Royals could trade DeJesus to someone like the Brewers for Rickie Weeks, then maybe this trade would work out for them.
Posted by: BrewCrewNation | December 09, 2008 at 09:19 AM
If GMDM trades Greinke for Frenchy, he should be fired instantly.
The only way that deal would even come close to making any sense is if the Braves also take on ALL of Guillen's contract AND send Escobar to the Royals.
Posted by: Haymaker | December 09, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Everyone, logic tell us this is false. Francoeur has zero trade value.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | December 09, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Francoeur has had a bad career, not a bad season.
Posted by: FanOTheRumors2 | December 09, 2008 at 09:21 AM
I agree with Dierkes. Coming from a Boston beat writer makes me a little suspicious. The braves would have to throw in a pitching prospect and one of their tier 2 prospects (Shafer, Gorkys, Freeman, Locke, etc.)
Posted by: DKA | December 09, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Francoeur's career line is:
.268/.312/.434/.746 with an OPS+ of 92 (including an OPS+ of 72 last year).
He's had 1 good year and 1 pretty bad year and two awful years.
Grienke has had one slightly below average years and three phenominal years. I don't see how they're similar at all.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:22 AM
"But back to what I was saying. Two seasons of Zach Greinke isn't going to net Royals fans as much as you think....."
Yes he will.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 09:24 AM
Francoeur is a guy who needs to hit for a high average to have offensive value since he won't take a walk and sucks defensively.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | December 09, 2008 at 09:24 AM
Royals would be insane to do this straight up.
Posted by: mmontice | December 09, 2008 at 09:26 AM
Uh, how about the Reds target Greinke? Braves can keep Franceour.
Posted by: Newman4 | December 09, 2008 at 09:27 AM
Greinke would be worth more in value in a trade than Peavy. Not because he is better - Peavy is and Peavy has a reasonable deal. But because (a) San Diego seemingly HAS to deal Peavy, whereas the Royals can hold onto Greinke; (b) Greinke has to go wherever the Royals tell him while Peavy has a NTC; (c) only 2-3 clubs seem to be able to trade for Peavy, while probably 10-15 clubs at least will be available to trade for Greinke.
Its all about the situation and context, I'm not saying Greinke is the better pitcher, just that the Royals are in a much better bargaining position than the Padres are. The Royals should demand a Dan Haren-esque deal, and if they don't get it, they should simply hold on to Zack.
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | December 09, 2008 at 09:27 AM
Grienke has had one slightly below average years and three phenominal years. I don't see how they're similar at all.
Your kidding right? Grienke has had 1 season with a WHIP under 1.20. 3 out of his 5 seasons, have been over a 3.8 ERA. He's had 1 great season last year, and 4 average seasons.
Posted by: BrewCrewNation | December 09, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Bdlugz,
What are you talking about?
Franocuer had one phenomenal half-season (his rookie year - 2005), 2 above average years (2006, 2007) and one bad year (2008).
Greinke has had one really good year (2008), 2 decent years (2004, 2007) and 2 mediocre years (2005-2006).
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 09:29 AM
Greinke/Guillen/$8 million cash for Escobar/Francoeur/Hernandez/Reyes/Schafer?
This would allow the Braves to go after Furcal and get rid of Frenchy. hile Kansas City finds an eventual replacement of Crisp, who is only there for a year and move Aviles over to second.
Posted by: CSL | December 09, 2008 at 09:29 AM
"Francoeur is a guy who needs to hit for a high average to have offensive value since he won't take a walk and sucks defensively."
Posted by: rememberthecoop | December 09, 2008 at 09:24 AM
sucks defensively? WOW, have you seen him play right field?
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | December 09, 2008 at 09:30 AM
DKA not trying to pick, but Freeman is not a tier 2. He is as elite as Heyward and Hanson.
Posted by: the_eddy | December 09, 2008 at 09:30 AM
"Greinke/Guillen/$8 million cash for Escobar/Francoeur/Hernandez/Reyes/Schafer?"
Posted by: CSL | December 09, 2008 at 09:29 AM
Why would the Royals want all those outfielders in return? Before you start throwing proposals out there, you need to look at the needs for both teams and not just throw in random names.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | December 09, 2008 at 09:33 AM
"DKA not trying to pick, but Freeman is not a tier 2. He is as elite as Heyward and Hanson.
Posted by: the_eddy | December 09, 2008 at 09:30 AM
Agreed, but I doubt he'll be apart of any greinke deal, as well as Hanson and Heyward.
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | December 09, 2008 at 09:34 AM
You have curious definition of "decent" if you say an ERA+ of 127 is "decent.
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | December 09, 2008 at 09:35 AM
Greinke and Guillen for Frenchy, Jurrjens and Escobar is the only way the Royals should do it
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Greinke has a way higher ceiling than Peavy, look at last years numbers and consider Peavy was in the way weaker NL and got to face the opposing pitcher plus Greinke is younger, not the health risk and doesn't make the high dollars for 2 more years
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Regardless, it doesn't really matter what our opinions are on the track record of Zack Greinke. I assure you the Royals brass think he is an "ace" and will only move him for what an "ace" gets. If no one is willing to give that up, well they're not going to get Zack. Maybe their opinion of him is inflated, as often happens in trade talks, but they're also not in a position where they have to move him.
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
CSL--
i like that trade
but the braves wont trade both Hernandez AND Schafer.
Alanta Gets:
Greinke
Guillen
Kansas City Gets:
Escobar
Francoeur
Reyes
Hernandez
K. Medlen
SHOULD get it done.
Posted by: apoxonbothyourhouses | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
One francoeur's above average years ('06) is very similar to Jose Guillen's '08 season. Just saying.
Posted by: kab21 | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Greinke has posted ERA+ of:
120
76
127
123
I'd say that's one bad season and three phenominal seasons. But you're right, im an idiot.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
sucks defensively? WOW, have you seen him play right field?
Posted by: Bravesfan89 | December 09, 2008 at 09:30 AM
He has a cannon of an arm, but he still has no range or no real direction. Sort of like Vlad.
Posted by: PorcelloisGod | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
CSL, Schafer and Gorkys won't be in a trade together or in the same season. Everything that I've seen or heard it seems as either one or the other. Maybe Brandon Jones or another minor league arm instead.
Posted by: the_eddy | December 09, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Royals
remember, the braves will be taking on the Headache that is Guillen
we take your ace, give you 2 starters...on Future Starter for CF. A #4 and possible future #3 in Reyes, and Medlen who will be a future closer or can be moved to the rotation.
if that doesn't float your boat...replace Medlen with Locke and you have two possible #2s who are Lefties.
Posted by: apoxonbothyourhouses | December 09, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Jurrjens should be apart of any deal for Greinke aswell
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 09:40 AM
This also makes no sense because the Royals need to get rid of an outfielder, not add one. Even if they dump Guillen, if they add Franceour they're back in the same position - four mediocre outfielders for three outfield spots. I don't see how this helps them at all.
Posted by: RoyalsRetro | December 09, 2008 at 09:40 AM
Don't see it...Absolute steal for the Braves...
Posted by: KG2577 | December 09, 2008 at 09:40 AM
It's a little early in the day to be stirring up a hornet's nest isn't it? I'm sure all the Braves fans are high fiving each other, as they should be. This better be false. I'm also calling BS. We already have a logjam in the outfield, why do we need Francouer? Seriously, Why? How is he going to make the team better when you subtract Greinke? Don't see it happening.
Posted by: Grover'sRoyals | December 09, 2008 at 09:41 AM
the league average ERA is well above 4 so..grienke is an above average pitcher- i wouldnt call him an ace yet but hed be one hell of a good 2nd or 3rd starter on an average team
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | December 09, 2008 at 09:42 AM
the funny thing is that a year ago, this deal would've looked a whole lot more possible. Now its just silly.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 09:42 AM
Francoeur's 2008 VORP: -17.8. That's right, Francoeur's VURP (Value Under Replacement Player) was 17.8.
The complete list of players who hurt their teams offensively more than Francoeur did:
Corey Patterson.
Tony Pena.
Nobody else.
Posted by: MetFanBen | December 09, 2008 at 09:42 AM
"Bdlugz,
What are you talking about?
Franocuer had one phenomenal half-season (his rookie year - 2005), 2 above average years (2006, 2007) and one bad year (2008)."
One phenominal half season, yep, he did. So did Neifi Perez, who cares.
in 2006 he was bad, posting an 87 OPS+, that isn't an average year. I'll give you 2007 as an average year, but saying it was above average is pushing it, he was pretty much right on the line of average.
2008 though is a whole new horse, he was terrible. He posted an OPS+ of 72, no OBP at all, and not much to talk about except for his arm. He is NOT that good.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:43 AM
I know some Royals fans are new to the discussion of Braves prospects.
FYI, Hanson, Jurrjens and Heyward are off the table, probably Freeman too. Only one of Schafer and Hernandez will be traded, most likely Hernandez.
I also highly doubt that the Braves will trade two regulars such as Francoeur and Escobar (no matter whether Francoeur should be a regular or not) and get a 32yo version of Francoeur at over $10 million more.
This is only two years of Greinke, so I'd think it's more likely to resemble the Peavy deal but with Francoeur replacing Escobar at the top.
Posted by: NickC | December 09, 2008 at 09:43 AM
"Your kidding right? Grienke has had 1 season with a WHIP under 1.20. 3 out of his 5 seasons, have been over a 3.8 ERA. He's had 1 great season last year, and 4 average seasons."
That's a case of cherry picking stats. I'm pretty sure a 25 year old pitcher with a career 4.28 ERA coming off of back to back seasons with ERAs of 3.69 and 3.47 is in pretty high demand.
He's had four healthy seasons where he's thrown actual innings. Three of those have come with ERAs under 4.00. Three have come with ERA+ over 110. He's had one bad season, one good one, and two very good ones.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 09:44 AM
"This is only two years of Greinke, so I'd think it's more likely to resemble the Peavy deal but with Francoeur replacing Escobar at the top."
That's great, but that means you won't get Grienke.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 09:44 AM
NickC, so it's going to resemble the Peavy deal but take out the one GOOD trade chip and replace him with a steaming pile of crap? Okay...
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:46 AM
As much sense as this makes, it makes that little. I know the Royal's GM has a bro-crush on Francoeur, and I'm sure Frank Wren loves Greinke too, It'd take way more than Francoeur to get Greinke. Why sell low on Francouer? Francoeur is a home-town boy that Wren will NOT trade. Period. I've seen this rumor 10 times and every time it's been WRONG. I'm assuming this guy made it up off the top of his head or stole it from someone else who made it up off the top of their head.
Posted by: AtlantaBred | December 09, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Have the Royals ever heard of OBP before?
Posted by: Trizza | December 09, 2008 at 09:46 AM
Why the hell are the Royals even interested in Francouer? They need OBP and starting pitching. They should move use Aviles at 2B and sign Furcal. Then sign a veteran reliever such as Randy Johnson.
Posted by: Rob M. | December 09, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Sorry I meant starter...
Posted by: Rob M. | December 09, 2008 at 09:48 AM
Jurrjens should be apart of any deal for Greinke aswell
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 09:48 AM
I think the trade will resemble this if it happens:
KC get:
Escobar
Frenchy
Morton
Reyes
Boyer
Medlan
ATL get:
Greinke
Teahen
Dejesus
Posted by: 5953Smith | December 09, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Cody, the only way you would get JJ is 1 for 1. And yes I know that would never happen. That is why I'm saying it
Posted by: the_eddy | December 09, 2008 at 09:50 AM
As a player of fantasy baseball, I sure would love to see Greinke with the Braves. If I were Wren, and this offer were out there for him, I'd rip the Burnett deal off the table, and go after another right fielder.
Posted by: KenInToront | December 09, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Maybe the Royals are going to start 5 OFers this season?
Posted by: MrQuestions | December 09, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Let's see what an update brings in terms of new info before this rumor is taken serious.
Posted by: studio179 | December 09, 2008 at 09:51 AM
OBP is not the be-all end-all of player evaluation. Sure, his was awful. But he also drove in over 100 runs 2 years in a row. Hit a decent amount of HRs. Was VERY young when he did it. Oh, and didn't he have something like the best BA in the majors with RISP for those two years? Francouer is by no means perfect, but he's a lot better than he's given credit for. A bad year is a bad year. The guy's what, 24? Greinke is good. Francouer is good, better than last year. What's with the blind bashing?
Posted by: daslied | December 09, 2008 at 09:51 AM
You guys don't realize how much of a beast Greinke would be in the NL think of Sabathia as a brewer.
Translate Greinke's al stats to the NL and Greinke's value skyrockets
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 09:52 AM
I was thinking the same thing. Royals start a bunch of OFers to take away any gaps.
Posted by: studio179 | December 09, 2008 at 09:53 AM
This would hands down the worst, most lopsided trade of the year.
Trading pitching for hitting is a bonehead move in this day and age. Greinke is like a franchise player to KC and Francoeur is pretty garbage who might not even have an everyday gig anymore in ATL. Spare parts for a stud? Sounds like ATL propagands to me.
Posted by: PL | December 09, 2008 at 09:55 AM
Braves could really dominate the NL East for years to come if they make the right moves. This years Winter Meetings are big for Frank Wren.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 09:55 AM
what is wrong with five outfielders? It's called depth. Teahen can play third and first as well, so all they would need is a back up middle infielder.
Posted by: CSL | December 09, 2008 at 09:55 AM
It's not blind bashing, daslied. The stats don't lie. You can pick out something like RBIs, but the fact is that is not an important stat as it relies on team performance more than personal performance. Francoeur gets on base at a pretty abysmal clip, which is a much more important stats when you talk about runs created. His OPS+ has been well below average for two years, and at average for one for each full season he's played.
You ask why the bashing, I ask why the love? Why fall in love with a guy that is a below average hitter for his career with bad range and a great arm? He doesn't get on base, he never really takes walks, and he doesn't have that huge pop for a corner outfielder.
Believe me, i've fallen in love with some players on my team that I was kind of blind to their poor performance as well; but you can't come here reciting RBIs and AVG with RISP and make it all better. Over the course of an entire season, he has never lived up to the hype.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:56 AM
RoyalsRetro:
He may be slightly more in value than Peavy. But Wren has stated that he isn't trading Heyward or Hanson, and I am sure you know that.
So, with that said, I'm sure if they were in "serious discussions", that would already be established.
Escobar, Francoeur, and 2 pitching prospects not named Hanson
Posted by: NEBravesfan33 | December 09, 2008 at 09:56 AM
Greinke is good, VERY good, but let's not start the CC comparisons please. We're nowhere near that level yet.
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 09:57 AM
jurrjens won't be traded anytime soon.
that's a silly notion.
Posted by: barracus79 | December 09, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Yeah, plus one is a lefty and the other is a righty. Greinke sounds more comparable to a Roy Oswalt than CC.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 09:59 AM
The Royals need pitching not to trade one of the best pitchers.
Posted by: ajwees41 | December 09, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Well the story yesterday scouts were saying that if Greinke was traded the asking price was 3 major league ready players and 2 high level top prospects
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 10:01 AM
Braves could really dominate the NL East for years to come if they make the right moves. This years Winter Meetings are big for Frank Wren.
ya but he's not getting Greinke without a gun and the braves fan that pilfered in his mind the Royals for Teahan and Dejesus, you've got to be kidding me?? Why not give yourself Soria too while you're being completely nuts. Go all the way with it.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 09, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Yeah well thats what happens when Alex Gordon.. well is.. Alex Gordon.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:03 AM
"OBP is not the be-all end-all of player evaluation. Sure, his was awful. But he also drove in over 100 runs 2 years in a row. Hit a decent amount of HRs. Was VERY young when he did it. Oh, and didn't he have something like the best BA in the majors with RISP for those two years?"
:\ None of those are important except for HR.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | December 09, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Yeah but they could easily pull off a Burnett/Greinke deal and have a better one two punch than Philly, plus have Jair. I'm not even a Braves fan, but If I were a philly fan, I would savor my recent world series victory.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:06 AM
The Royals need to build around Greinke and Meche by acquiring either Sonnanstine or Jackson from the Rays for one of their extra OF/1B/DH types.
Personally, I'd like to see Billy Butter-Eater sent packing, as he can't run or field.
Posted by: Haymaker | December 09, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Alex Gordon is a fine ballplayer a .350 plus obp is great for a 2nd year player. 2nd half of the year he was around .380obp and if he would have missed 25 games his numbers were have been 20 hrs and 80 rbis in a ballpark thats not home run friendly at all
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 10:10 AM
What in the heck are you smoking:
rememberthecoop: Frenchy sucks defensively.
WOW the guy has not finished outside the top 3 rightfielders in assists since he came in the league. He also has more assists than any other major league outfielder since 2005 and thats fact not guessing.
Posted by: David | December 09, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Even as a Braves fan, this doesn't make sense. Frank Wren wouldn't allow the Burnett dealings to hold this trade up. If he could get Greinke, he would go for it and drop the offer to Burnett.
My only concern with trading for Greinke would be that he only has two years left on his deal. If anything more than Francoeur is offered, then it needs to be a sign and trade deal where Greinke at least agrees to a 2 year extension (at a significant pay raise).
And for those talking about Jurrjens, that isn't happening. Why would the Braves trade their own 22 year old star pitcher (who is locked up for several more years) with no health issues at all for a 25 year old pitcher who has 2 years on his contract and has a history of mental health concerns. Doesn't make sense does it?
And the Braves aren't trading Heyward, Hanson, or Freeman for anyone. They are all untouchable. Nor are they trading Francoeur, Schafer, and Hernandez. That would leave the Royals with a ton of outfielders and the Braves with none of them.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | December 09, 2008 at 10:10 AM
No, they couldn't easily pull off any deal for Greinke. It would cost them a TON, and Wren will flinch at the cost. It will never happen, and I'm not even a Royals fan (shocking I know, with all of them running around).
Turns out Greinke's value skyrocketed when the Royals realized he had better career hitting stats too:
.250/.250/.583/.833 !!
Sorry, I'm bored at work and looking up some numbers, heh...
Posted by: Bdlugz | December 09, 2008 at 10:11 AM
The Royals would be very stupid to do this.
Posted by: joeiscool12 | December 09, 2008 at 10:11 AM
Seems like both sides fans hate the idea.
Posted by: IFiredScottBoras | December 09, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Dayton Moore is a great GM he'll find a way to fleece the Braves if he wants too
Posted by: Cody | December 09, 2008 at 10:14 AM
"OBP is not the be-all end-all of player evaluation. Sure, his was awful. But he also drove in over 100 runs 2 years in a row."
Are you really going to use RBI as a method of evaluating a player? You can put any Francoeur-like below average hitter in the middle of a lineup and see him get to 100 RBI (see Joe Carter from days past).
"Hit a decent amount of HRs. "
11 is decent?
"Was VERY young when he did it. Oh, and didn't he have something like the best BA in the majors with RISP for those two years?"
Well, no he didn't. These stats are readily available on Hardball Times.
" Francouer is good, better than last year. What's with the blind bashing?"
How do we know?
Posted by: vtadave | December 09, 2008 at 10:15 AM