![]() |
|
|
| |
« No Extension Offers For Pirates' Veterans | Main | 2010 Options: Milwaukee Brewers »
MONDAY: Chico Harlan of the Washington Post has a Nationals source who "dismissed the seriousness" of the Johnson-Delcarmen discussions. Harlan says the Nationals believe they can get more value by waiting into the summer to trade Johnson, and have "fielded calls from about a dozen teams." What do you think - will the Nats maximize Johnson's value by waiting?
FRIDAY: Earlier today, we heard that the Nationals had offered Nick Johnson to the Red Sox in exchange for Manny Delcarmen. WEEI's Alex Speier is reporting that the Red Sox have officially turned the offer down.
According to Delcarmen's agent, Jim Masteralexis, the trade was "immediately shot down." Both Delcarmen and Johnson are having fine seasons, but it looks like the Nationals will have to try something else in order to improve their bullpen.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Send Nick the stick to the Mets for Sean green and a bag of balls we won't turn that down I promise ya!
Posted by: MetsFan1990 | May 22, 2009 at 07:35 PM
"Both Delcarmen and Johnson are both having fine seasons..."
Get rid of one "both." Sorry to nitpick! :-D
Posted by: Jay | May 22, 2009 at 08:19 PM
Not a problem at all! I appreciate the feedback. Thanks Jay.
Posted by: Steve Adams | May 22, 2009 at 08:22 PM
I actually like this trade, as I think Johnson could be a really good DH and perhaps not playing the field could help him stay healthy (coincidentally just as it did Ortiz), I feel it is a few weeks too early for the Red Sox until they are ready to make a move at DH.
Posted by: drchstrpunk | May 22, 2009 at 08:40 PM
I don't think would have been a bad deal for the Sox especially since Masterson is now back in the pen. Perhaps they have intentions of dealing Masterson later this season.
Posted by: fitz | May 22, 2009 at 08:52 PM
"Perhaps they have intentions of dealing Masterson later this season."
I doubt it. Theo and Francona both love Masterson's ability to move seamlessly from starter to set up to multi-inning relief... think early career of Derek Lowe. Delcarmen makes the most sense if anyone is going to move, but it's still early yet and I don't trust Johnson as far as I could throw him, which coincidentally would put him on the 60 day DL.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | May 23, 2009 at 12:21 AM
I may be blinded as a Sox fan when it comes to Masterson (you DO NOT trade young sinkerballers who have success), but I know I am blinded when it comes to Delcarmen. He grew up in Hyde Park, in my neighborhood. I heard his name growing up playing baseball, as he was only ever a year or so ahead of me and was loosely in my sisters' social circles. This is a hometown kid who can throw heat and has nasty stuff. Yes, he struggles with his command at times. But right now, he gets guys out more often than not and is still cost controlled. Why move him in a deal for anything less than a marquee slugger? Nick Johnson And His DL Entries are not a good idea (and an even worse band name). Sure, he'll give us a .400 OBP when healthy. But how often is he going to be healthy? I'd rather stick with the deepest bullpen in baseball right now.
Posted by: Kelric | May 23, 2009 at 01:42 AM
Declarmen is just too good and too cheap to give up for an injury-prone guy that's going to walk after the season.
For Declarmen, they should at least get a guy that's under control for a couple seasons.
I know it's extremely unlikely, but trying to pry Shin-Soo Choo from Cleveland could be a great move for Boston. Choo is a really good player.
Posted by: scribbletone | May 23, 2009 at 11:04 AM
I don't see what's so special with Declarmen. I understand why Kelric likes him. He's a middle relief pitcher with a good heater but nothing special.
Posted by: kdub | May 23, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Right, young, potential closers under team control who throw in the high 90's grow on tree's! Who would want one of those.
Posted by: RED SOX DYNASTY! | May 23, 2009 at 03:55 PM
Delcarmen is the Red Sox most likely trade chip. If you trade Delcarmen you need to get back a player of equal value, preferably a SS, C or young OF. You could also see a Delcarmen-Holliday/Cabrera swap at the deadline if the A's are out of it.
Posted by: jcullen71 | May 23, 2009 at 05:36 PM
Good move by the Sox. Johnson's a good bat but isn't worth DelCarmen straight up. Boston isn't desperate and there are other potential good bats on the market, no need to give up a reliable good+ MLB reliever for a part-time player. Still, a trade to get Johnson involving lesser trade chips wouldn't be a bad idea. The guy can definately hit, even if he is built with glue and paper clips.
Posted by: Lock | May 24, 2009 at 07:57 AM
I think that the Nats should move Johnson sooner than later. The market has not really been made and Johnson's value and health are very good right now. The Nats can't afford to miss the market and end up dumping him for little at the deadline. So, if I were Rizzo, I would be taking the best deal on the table that is passable, if there are any, right now. And in the mean time I'd continue to keep Johnson in bubble-wrap at all times that he is not on the field, etc.
Posted by: Chacho | May 25, 2009 at 09:45 AM
y not they have plenty of pitching and delcarmen isnt that great. papi isnt hitting so throw johnson in the cleanup spot and have youk hit third
Posted by: petty15 | May 25, 2009 at 10:00 AM
y not they have plenty of pitching and delcarmen isnt that great. papi isnt hitting so throw johnson in the cleanup spot and have youk hit third
Posted by: petty15 | May 25, 2009 at 10:00 AM
y not they have plenty of pitching and delcarmen isnt that great. papi isnt hitting so throw johnson in the cleanup spot and have youk hit third
Posted by: petty15 | May 25, 2009 at 10:00 AM
If the Nats want to trade Johnson, they need to get rid of him ASAP. Johnson has a history of injury. He is having a great season so far, but the moment he gets injured his trade value falls through the floor. The Nats need to get rid of him now while the demand and Johnson's numbers are high.
Posted by: dgiff84 | May 25, 2009 at 10:26 AM
WHY are people talking about this like Nick Johnson is GOOD?! He is hitting 64 full points ABOVE his career average. He is not this good, and has never been worth anything.
The only pitcher id give up for him is Javy Lopez!
Posted by: jimithin9 | May 25, 2009 at 10:27 AM
"Delcarmen-Holliday"
I don't care if it's only a half season of matt holliday, but do you really think that's something, judging by his track record, that Billy Beane would even remotely consider? Teams will be chomping at the bit to outbid an offer of Delcarmen.
Posted by: Jason F | May 25, 2009 at 10:41 AM
Nats better be careful. Given Johnson's history he's as likely to wind up back on the D.L. as he is to appreciate in value over the summer.
Posted by: MickS | May 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM
"WHY are people talking about this like Nick Johnson is GOOD?!"
Last two full season lines:
.289/.408/.479
.290/.428/.520
Granted, he has been injured a lot, but don't say he isn't worth anything. There is a possibility he won't get injured again this year. If he doesn't, he certainly has value. If a team like the Giants were to give up a B prospect, he would look damn good manning 1B for the rest of the season, were he to stay healthy.
Posted by: Jason F | May 25, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Guys, Delcarmen is good, but HE IS A RELIEVER. Not a starter. He will never be a starter. That immediately tanks his value. Immediately.
Posted by: melonis rex | May 25, 2009 at 10:58 AM
"If a team like the Giants were to give up a B prospect, he would look damn good manning 1B for the rest of the season, were he to stay healthy."
I couldn't agree more and I think the Giants badly need to get this done. Then trade for Uggla which would completely revamp the middle of their lineup.
and I think it's hilarious how all these red sox fans are going bonkers over delcarmen. His value is extremely limited, and yes, he is good, but common holliday? Or even a hitter like holliday? I think delcarmen has the most value to the sox and therefore they should keep him.
Posted by: Leland11 | May 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM
"I think the Giants badly need to get this done. Then trade for Uggla which would completely revamp the middle of their lineup."
If they are gonna make a run at the Dodgers for the division title this year these two moves should be made very quickly. Sanchez for Uggla and Merkin Valdez for Johnson both seem reasonable.
Lewis LF
Renteria/Burris SS
Sandoval 3B
Johnson 1B
Molina C
Uggla 2B
Winn RF
Rowand CF
Thats still not a great offense but at least there aren't any major holes and even though it would still be seriously lacking in HR power, there's a lot of gap power in there. If they don't like their chances of overtaking the Dodgers this year (and I don't blame them if they don't) the Sanchez/Uggla swap isn't a very good idea, but Valdez for Johnson would still be a good deal. The Giants get a look at him and maybe a chance to extend him over the next few months without giving up much, and its not as though he'd be blocking any good youngsters at 1B. Ishikawa is not the answer, and Guzman's d looks so bad right now that they can't put him out there every day. A Guzman/Johnson platoon in 2010 would be a whole lot better than the Aurilia/Ishi platoon they started with this year.
Posted by: BLB | May 25, 2009 at 11:44 AM
The Red Sox failed rule number 1 of trading: ALWAYS trade RP for useful hitters. ALWAYS. No matter how good Manny Delcarmen may be, he's worth 1.5 wins above replacement at most over a season. That's it. Nick Johnson has been worth 1.2 so far this year and will end up above that. There's an injury risk, but his chance of a freak injury is way lower as a DH. Bad call by the Sox declining this deal, and worse call by the Nats even proposing it.
Posted by: thehoagster07 | May 25, 2009 at 12:05 PM
It's not a bad call by Boston if they can package him later for a more elite, reliable, durable slugger than Johnson. You don't trade your chips if it isn't for exactly what you want.
Posted by: ilikebaseball | May 25, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Waiting to trade Johnson is stupid. The man is a ticking time bomb. Either they haven't learned their lesson and truly think he can stay healthy for a year or they have replaced all his body parts with bionic parts already and there is nothing left to break. Strike while the iron is hot and trade him now while he has value.
Posted by: GScott | May 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM
"You don't trade your chips if it isn't for exactly what you want"
That is the most relevant point made for not wasting MDC for Johnson yet.
Johnson has a severe history of injuries and is performing thus far way over his career numbers. Why give the Nats a closer for him? And also, who said anything about MDC as a starter, or even compared the value of a starter for Johnson? MDC would be a 8th inning guy on several teams and has really deserved that role, but on Boston he is not going to get that chance it looks like, so it probably will be him if traded at all, but his value is no less just because he has proven himself over the last 3 seasons as a dependable late inning guy that is able to go more than 1 inning if needed.
The Nats just thought they could pull a "fast one" and some posters here for some reason must not be very familiar with MDC and are blind to him also and think is a mid level reliever or something to be traded for a always injured 1/2 season rental.
Posted by: johns | May 25, 2009 at 12:34 PM
IMHO Manny will go west, if anywhere for, say, a deal like
Delcarman, Lugo, Bailey, Penny and $$$ to the Padres for for Adrian Gonzalez and Brian Giles and Nick Hundley. Padres need help at SS, SP, RP and want to unload salary. Youk goes to 3rd, Lowell, Papi & Giles split DH duties, PH and spot start as circumstances warrant. Sox add punch to their bench, find a top flight 1st baseman and a young catcher with some potential offense.
Posted by: hawkny | May 25, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Lugo-negative trade value
Penny-negative trade value
Bailey and Delcarmen barely have enough value to bring the Sox side of the offer above sea level, let alone enough to grab even Hundley or Giles.
Posted by: thehoagster07 | May 25, 2009 at 01:02 PM
Hawkny,
Why would SD trade for two contracts they cannot pay a AAA player who will be banished back to Pawtucket when Mark Kotsay returns and MDC. Now, I love the Sox and I do believe AG is available for the right price, but that price would have to include Buchholz or Bowden, and most likely both and some other top prospects. SD is in financial trouble they are not picking up two big contracts for spots they can fill with low price talent and they are not catching the Dodgers.
MDC makes the Sox bullpen very nice, pitching wins playoff games and Nick Johnson goes on the DL if he cuts himself shaving. This deal is never gonna happen.
Posted by: CircusFresh | May 25, 2009 at 01:05 PM
MDC is better than just a regular middle reliever, but relief pitchers have less value than hitters.
Considering the shelf life of most relievers, I still don't see the benefit of making a Johnson-for-a-reliever deal for the Nats at all. Getting 1 stable RP isn't going to solve their bullpen woes.
Posted by: thehoagster07 | May 25, 2009 at 01:05 PM
"Delcarman, Lugo, Bailey, Penny and $$$ to the Padres for for Adrian Gonzalez and Brian Giles and Nick Hundley"
Laughable. All teams' fans propose ridiculous trade scenarios, but Sox fans are the worst. You get 3 extremely useful players, they get 3 garbage players and 1 above average reliever. Get real...
Posted by: Jason F | May 25, 2009 at 01:24 PM
I don't get the Nationals.
They stink. Everyone knows it. Why waste trading for a guy like Delcarmen? Trade Johnson for 2 prospects. They should accumulating young talent, not trying to get a veteran to help their pen now.
Posted by: icedrake523 | May 25, 2009 at 01:38 PM
IMHO Manny will go west, if anywhere for, say, a deal like
Delcarman, Lugo, Bailey, Penny and $$$ to the Padres for for Adrian Gonzalez and Brian Giles and Nick Hundley. Padres need help at SS, SP, RP and want to unload salary. Youk goes to 3rd, Lowell, Papi & Giles split DH duties, PH and spot start as circumstances warrant. Sox add punch to their bench, find a top flight 1st baseman and a young catcher with some potential offense.
Posted by: hawkny | May 25, 2009 at 12:42 PM
ok buddy,
1st thing wrong here is that SD is trying to reduce payrole. Lugo makes pretty close to what Giles makes. And Lugo sucks ass. But I think he would do allot better on a small market teams. Allot less preasure. Not to mention Giles has a no-trade clause and VETO'd a trade to the Sox last AUG. and why would SD want a guy like Bailey when they have a top 5 1st base prospect coming up? And Penny wouldn't help SD out very much. If he gets traded it will be to a team thats makeing a push for the playoffs. I think that Gonzo would be a great fit for Boston and Hundley may draw some interest from Theo. But it would cost allot more the MDC and Bailey. I think it would have to start off with Masterson/ Lowerie or Bowden or Bard then a couple of other Mid- low level prospects to make a Gonzo Based deal go through.
As for the MDC/Johnson trade I am so happy that the Sox Shot that down. MDC is under team control for years to come and Johnson is an injury prone rental player. Although Johnson is playing very well thus far this year he is probably going to cool right down.. I think that Someone like Dunn would be a much better fit for Boston. And I think if the Nats were to deal Dunn now while his bat is hot they could get allot more in-return then if they hold off. Pluss it will allow them to clear money for there #1 pick.
Posted by: nakid | May 25, 2009 at 01:43 PM
hawkny - that is one of the worst trade proposals I have ever seen.
Posted by: Leland11 | May 25, 2009 at 03:14 PM
The Giants could get Johnson for pretty much any decent reliever in their system.
The Bosox said no to Delcarmen because 1. They dont really need Johnson that badly and 2. Delcarmen is a home town fan favourite.
If Delcarmen was on the Giants I would say it would have been a go forsure but he's not. The Giants would only have to offer up a young major league reliever or a near ready prospect to get Johnson. Matos maybe.
If I was Delcarmen I would be thankful I wasnt traded to the Nats but at the same time, if he had been traded there he likely would have been put in a closer role eventually and in my opinion, he could have a great career as a closer but he will NEVER have that chance in Boston.
Posted by: xethicx | May 25, 2009 at 03:47 PM
I wouldnt say NEVER, if Papelbon asks for a ridiculous number and he keeps giving up 2 run jacks, I could see Theo letting him walk. Its not likely, but possible if the stars align perfectly.
Posted by: CircusFresh | May 25, 2009 at 06:05 PM
Well, guys, what one sees depends upon where one sits.
You may very well be right that my trade proposal is ridiculous, by whichever criteria you chose to use. From my point of view, if the Sox are to make a trade of any significance mid-season it will be with a west coast team in the NL. When Glavine comes on board, one of the Sox 7 starters is going to have to go. My guess, Penny, who, if healthy, can be a #2/3 starter elsewhere. When Lowerie comes back either Green or Lugo have to go. My choice, Lugo. If the Sox were to acquire Gonzalez, Bailey would fill the role of backup for Kyle Blanks, if he doesn't shoot any. He might even start until Blanks is ready. As for Giles, for reasons on the field, and off the field, he does not want to be in California much longer (joint property state). New owner, Moorad ($40M salary cap) may have a hand in this too. If the Sox sweeten the pot enough with cash to offset Lugo,who is owed about $13M over the next 18 months this trade can happen as it boils down to Manny for Hundley when all is said and done, money considerations on both sides aside.
Posted by: hawkny | May 26, 2009 at 08:08 AM
Circus Fresh:
They would give the job to Bard (if proven by then) or Okajima before they would try Manny there. I just dont think Francona will ever see him as a closer.
Posted by: xethicx | May 26, 2009 at 08:19 AM
"When Glavine comes on board, one of the Sox 7 starters is going to have to go."
Temporarily putting aside the fact that you have proposed a trade in which Adrian Gonzalez is dealt to the Red Sox and does not bring back a single prospect, let alone a prospect package, it is difficult to take you seriously when your finger is so far from the pulse that you think Tom Glavine will be joining the Red Sox.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | May 26, 2009 at 08:20 AM
If the Padres are going to trade Adrian Gonzalez, it's going to be for a hell of a lot more than Lugo, Penny, Bailey and MDC.
If the Sox want to get serious, they need to wow the Padres with an offer, not insult them. They may want to cut payroll, but they aren't just going to give away a guy like Gonzalez. The Sox would have to do something like: Buchholz, Lowrie, and Daniel Bard. I don't even know if that would be enough.
Posted by: Papelboner | May 26, 2009 at 09:25 AM
I think Hawkny meant Smoltz.Last year they were both on the Braves.
Posted by: redsoxfan17 | May 26, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Yes, I did...
Thanks #17
Posted by: hawkny | May 26, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Apparently some posters on this thread do not read the Globe...
http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/articles/2009/05/26/no_hurry_to_flip_him_but_penny_has_value/?page=1
Penny was a 16 game winner in both 2006 and 2007. In his mosty recent outings he has looked much sharper than early on. Please note the "paunch". It is shrinking as he pitches himself into shape. In San Diego, Penny could be the #3 starter, easily...
Posted by: hawkny | May 26, 2009 at 03:52 PM
What does Penny's potential value as a SP upgrade for a team in contention have to do with the Padres and Adrian Gonzalez? I don't think it's so much an issue of not reading the Globe as it is an issue of realizing that the Globe's speculation as to the market for Penny does not in any way support your wild trade scenario.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | May 26, 2009 at 04:58 PM