![]() |
|
|
| |
« Maggs In Platoon; 2010 Option May Not Kick In | Main | Odds And Ends: Delcarmen, Jays, Perez »
All of this morning's Roy Halladay rumors:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
"Bob Elliott of the Toronto Sun lists the Angels and Brewers as the leaders to acquire Halladay."
The Angels don't have the elite level talent to get Halladay. Unless the Angels are ready to give up Weaver or Napoli, they're not getting a Halladay deal done. They don't have elite level talent in their minor league system.
Brewers might be able to get a deal done with Gamel, Escobar, Lawrie, Cain, and a 5th guy, maybe (I don't know their system well)
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 11:15 AM
i doubt Milwaukee would give both gamel and Escobar, although i agree they should have to..
i still think hes going to Philly if anywhere
Posted by: Adam | July 09, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Gamel + Escobar in and of themselves would be a great haul for the Jays. Anything else they could pry away would be icing on the cake, IMO.
It is correct that now is the best time to get the most in return for Halladay. If they wait 'til the off season or next years deadline the price will have to be reduced significantly. Not to mention that is more money they have to pay Roy.
Posted by: RonMexico | July 09, 2009 at 11:23 AM
What do you do if you're the Phillies, and Toronto demands that J.A. Happ + Jason Donald + more are required to do the Halladay deal?
For the Brewers, this move actually makes some sense...they could get Halladay for the farm, but if they do not contend next year they *could* trade him and recoup some of their losses...understanding that Halladay's trade value is more right now than it would be next year - he's a rental next year for someone else.
Posted by: xlazox | July 09, 2009 at 11:25 AM
People said the Cubs didn't have the prospects to get Peavy but that wasn't true. With the Cards and Brewers trying to get him, don't be surprised to see the Cubs jump in some time. That said, I think the Phillies have the best shot with the Angels a close second.
Posted by: CuBzwin | July 09, 2009 at 11:27 AM
DONT FORGET HALLADAY ALSO HAS A NO TRADE CLAUSE
He might not want to go to the small market teams such as the Brewers, Pirates, Rockies, Diamondbacks, Nationals, Marlins, A's, Indians, Braves, Twins, Royals, and Orioles
Posted by: Giants rulez | July 09, 2009 at 11:28 AM
If your philly and the first 2 players Toronto asks for is Happ and Donald your happy as hell. the 1st 2 players are asking for from the phils is 2 of Carrasco, Drabek,Taylor,Brown.
Personally I hope Drabek and Taylor then Donald and Happ.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 11:28 AM
xlazox - You're right about it making sense for the Brewers. I said nearly the same thing in the Cardinals post earlier.
Even trading Gamel and Escobar, you'd have to think the return they could get at next year's deadline would be on par (or better) than what they gave up for C.C. Of course, there's a certain amount of risk involved in terms of injury.
If Melvin pulls it off I hope he immediately walks down to the clubhouse and kicks Braun in the nuts. That would be two consecutive years he pulls of a deal for a top-4 mlb pitcher.
Posted by: RonMexico | July 09, 2009 at 11:30 AM
@Devmac: Happ and Donald are the two ML ready guys (with Donald being close). It has been reported that the Jays want a SS, so Donald would be a piece.
With a Halladay, they may ask for all the names you listed. For the Phillies (addressed to Philly fans), is it worth it?
Do you trade the farm for Roy Halladay?
Posted by: xlazox | July 09, 2009 at 11:31 AM
"It is correct that now is the best time to get the most in return for Halladay. If they wait 'til the off season or next years deadline the price will have to be reduced significantly. Not to mention that is more money they have to pay Roy."
Next year's deadline, yes. Offseason? No. More teams will be interested in the offseason, especially since the pitching FA market is awful. And, more teams will have payroll flexibility due to expiring contracts, the ability to non-tender dead weight, etc.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 11:34 AM
If a Roy Halladay deal does not absolutely ravage and destroy a team's farm system, and that team's name is not Texas, Oakland, Florida, or Tampa Bay (the 3 latter teams wouldn't make a Halladay deal anyway), then the Jays did not get a good haul for Halladay.
If the Jays don't have a top 5 system, hell, top 3 after all the promotions the A's, Fish, Rays, and Rangers made, in MLB after a Halladay trade, they're doing it wrong.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Frankly even if the team is Texas, Oakland, Florida, or Tamba, the Jays should ravage the team's farm system.
Posted by: Torgen | July 09, 2009 at 11:38 AM
I really hope the phils let this guy pass. Happ has been pitching extremely well as of late and seems to have the personality of a #2-#3 guy. So between Drabek, Savery, Carrasco, Carpenter, Knapp they really have a chance to form a young stud rotation that will pick up after some of the offense leaves in the future.
Posted by: Snakes on a Plane | July 09, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Anyone notice the Cards not mentioned on there? Have the Mets listed at 100-1 and the Cards not listed! As a big Brett Wallace fan I say THANK YOU!!!
Posted by: stlcards16 | July 09, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Torgen, you're right. I should've been more clear with that, those are the only 4 teams who wouldn't have a bottom 5-10 farm system after putting together a fair Halladay offer, not factoring in players from this year's draft, since most haven't signed yet.
It'll ravage their systems though.
Posted by: melonis rex | July 09, 2009 at 11:47 AM
If you were a GM who would you give up to obtain him???
I say the 2 weakest farm systems are Astros and Mets unless u take their whole AAA &AA teams
Posted by: Giants rulez | July 09, 2009 at 11:48 AM
If you were a GM who would you give up to obtain him???
I say the 2 weakest farm systems are Astros and Mets unless u take their whole AAA &AA teams
Posted by: Giants rulez | July 09, 2009 at 11:48 AM
If you were a GM who would you give up to obtain him???
I say the 2 weakest farm systems are Astros and Mets unless u take their whole AAA &AA teams
Posted by: Giants rulez | July 09, 2009 at 11:48 AM
What is with all the massive double and triple posting on this site lately.
Posted by: Devmac | July 09, 2009 at 11:52 AM
If I'm the phils I start the conversation with Donald, Marson, Carrasco, Brown and try to stay away from Drabek Taylor and Knapp and if asked for them each I give away Drabek first and that should be enough.
I personally think Knapp's upside is more than Drabek's and he should be in Clearwater already. The only positive if Drabek does go is that it moves Knapp up to fill that hole and then Pettibone should move to Lakewood to fill Knapp's spot.
There's more coming folks, you just need to pay attention to the lower levels to see it.
All in all its nice to have a system that people are talking about instead of laughing about.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 12:02 PM
"People said the Cubs didn't have the prospects to get Peavy but that wasn't true. With the Cards and Brewers trying to get him, don't be surprised to see the Cubs jump in some time. That said, I think the Phillies have the best shot with the Angels a close second."
We dont have the money or prospects to get involved. We might call, but it will be a short call.
"What is with all the massive double and triple posting on this site lately."
I have had some problems where the post button doesnt register, even upon refresh the post doesnt show up, but then when I click it again, two or three posts show up. Its an evil button I tell you!
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 12:08 PM
"If I'm the phils I start the conversation with Donald, Marson, Carrasco, Brown and try to stay away from Drabek Taylor and Knapp and if asked for them each I give away Drabek first and that should be enough."
I think that it's pretty clear that the Phillies are the frontrunners to land Halladay, and it really isn't close, except for maybe the Rangers.
In a perfect world, the Blue Jays would accept some sort of Brown/Carrasco/Donald/Marson/Carpenter offer, but realistically I think that the Blue Jays would go hard after Drabek.
If the aforementioned offer would be enough to get it done, and that's not an awful offer, then I think that you make that deal if you're Philly.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 09, 2009 at 12:30 PM
In the interest of full disclosure, let me just say that I am a huge Brewers fan and will try to keep that bias out of this thought.
Gamel and Escobar are 2 very fine prospects and any team parting with them for a 12-18 month rental of any pitcher, even Doc, would have to have its head examined.
With that said, you certainly have to part with one of them. My guess is that Toronto prefers Gamel. Starting with him, I think they would need to toss players like Salome, Lucroy, Greene and Gillespie into the mix. 3 of that 4 in addition to Gamel might not even get it done. The biggest problem the Brew Crew faces is the lack of elite pitching towrd the top of the farm system.
My guess is that they call and decide against pursuing Halladay when it becomes clear what the price is going to be.
Posted by: beercheesepain | July 09, 2009 at 12:30 PM
I hope the Phillies gut themselves to land Halliday and the Rangers don't trade guys who they'll regret trading later on. Better for Doc to be in the NL and it protects the Rangers from repeating past mistakes in trading away hot young pitching.
Posted by: MadmanTX | July 09, 2009 at 12:49 PM
Considering the lack of pitching depth in Milwaukee's system, I think that any offer would have to include Gamel and Escobar, unless you wanted to give Toronto essentially every other decent prospect you had instead.
Escobar, Lawrie, Jeffress, Salome, Green, and Dykstra/Cain?
Posted by: scribbletone | July 09, 2009 at 12:55 PM
In a perfect world, the Blue Jays would accept some sort of Brown/Carrasco/Donald/Marson/Carpenter offer, but realistically I think that the Blue Jays would go hard after Drabek.
If the aforementioned offer would be enough to get it done, and that's not an awful offer, then I think that you make that deal if you're Philly.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 09, 2009 at 12:30 PM
I likewise would sign for that above offer right now.
If i have to include Drabek I would reluctantly but I wouldn't include Drabek and Happ. that's too much and weakens our present and future. I have confidence in Knapp but know he's too far away to count on for anything less than 3 years out.
A potential playoff rotation of Halladay, Hamels, Happ, Blanton would be pretty good especially if we can get our bullpen straightened out.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 01:11 PM
no comments about the red sox goin after him yet...wow.
well here u go...
how about this trade?
clay, diaz(ss), lars for halladay
or maybe get a 3rd team involved to get rid of lugo and give that prospect and/or aaron bates to them?
Posted by: brendon lattuca | July 09, 2009 at 01:15 PM
We're all talking about it, but how's it gone unreported here that Melvin publicly said he'd make a call on Halladay???
Alcides Escobar (SS), Jonathan Lucroy (C), Manny Parra (SP), and Mark Rogers (SP) would be a strong offer. We are talking a year and a half of Roy freaking Halladay so add another solid prospect or two to get this done.
Yovani still needs time as the #2 in the rotation before becoming their ace.
Just to put my alliances out there, I'm a San Diego sports fan through and through, but when it comes to baseball, it's hard to not get excited by the Brewers, Braves, A's, Astros, Twins, Red Sox and Rays... personally, of course!
Posted by: WestCoastBias | July 09, 2009 at 01:23 PM
brendon,
what value does Lars have at this point with his year that he's having? and Diaz? He's not exactly blowing the doors off either.
So basically you're offering a guy that while he has a no-hitter on his resume struggled as a major leaguer last year for the best pitcher in your division. Exactly why would the Jays do that?
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 01:33 PM
That brewers offer doesn't get it done, and adding a solid prospect to it doesn't get it done either.
Didn't realize just how incredible Knapp's periphs were.
How about Brown/Drabek/Marson/Donald/Knapp
Although I suspect the jays will want Carrasco as well.
Posted by: The_Bunk | July 09, 2009 at 01:43 PM
I honestly feel bad for whatever team is dumb enough to GUT their farm system for this guy.
He's the best pitcher in baseball.. right now. He's 32. He makes $15 million a year and he's only signed up for this year and next. You aren't going to get an extension window.
The comments I'm seeing from Blue Jays fans (I'm a Yankee fan in the interest of disclosure).. Brandon Wood isn't elite enough to be a centerpiece.. Gamel AND Escobar AND pitching.. Bucholz plus 3 or 4 more players.. Hughes/Montero not quite enough from the Yanks.. half the Phillies top ten..
It's downright comical.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 01:47 PM
What are the Blue Jays after here? Volume? Or would they accept a less comprehensive package from a team provided it had a prospect they feel strongly about (whether that's Drabek or Escobar or whoever)? We don't know the answer to this question, and it's that answer, more than anything, that will drive where Halladay ends up.
Posted by: robdeer | July 09, 2009 at 02:02 PM
Anyone who think the Angels don't have the talent to bring in Halladay are just kidding themselves.
1. Brandon Wood. The best SS in the minors and it's not even close. I'm not even a Wood fan and even I know he's a shoe in for .260 30 DB 30 HR in a pitcher's park, He's a top 5 offensive SS already and the Angels are holding him back.
2. Trevor Reckling. Just turned 20 years old, has a 2.47 ERA in AA, and is left handed and is still growing. His fastball is 2-3 mph faster than it was last year, curve has a sharper break and has just developed a wicked slider and change. He'll be a a major league all-star before he's 23.
3. Jordan Walden. Career minor league ERA in the low 3's, more K's than innings pitched, touching triple digits on the rader gun, is commonly compared to a better version of John Lackey, and he's only 21.
4. Trevor Bell. 2005 1st round pick, Currently 22 years old, in AAA with an ERA of 1.67 and a season ERA between AA and AAA of under 2.50.
5. Hank Conger. 2006 1st round pick, only 20 year old and is a AA all-star catcher. He'll be ready for the bigs in a year at age 21 and projects to be a .290 25 HR catcher with above average defense.
6. Sean Rodriguez. 24 year old 2B in AAA, before being called up was on pace for well over 40 HR this season. K prone in all fairness. Can also play SS, 3B, all 3 OF, and catcher.
7. Chris Pettit. 22 years old in AAA, plays all 3 OF positions well, before injury was batting over .350 with an OBP well over .400. Projects as a solid defending OF with .280 30 DB 15 HR 25 SB stat line. Poor man's Matt Kemp.
8. Erick Aybar, Howie Kendrick, Mike Napoli, Jered Weaver, Kendry Morales
No one can can say the Angels don't have the talent, they acutally have a quite a bit more than most teams. Stop reading Baseball America, an East Coast biased publication for fans only, scouts don't pay any attention to that crap, they know better. So should all of you.
Posted by: Scott | July 09, 2009 at 02:18 PM
Branden Wood is the new Joel Guzman. He's in AAA for a reason. Most of his big numbers come from playing in an extreme hitter's park in a hitter's league.
Weaver has to be part of any deal from the Angels, which shouldn't be a problem since Reckling and Walden are apparently almost aces themselves.
Posted by: cascando | July 09, 2009 at 02:25 PM
Scott,
I thought the knock on Conger was he can't stay healthy and isn't good behind the plate?
I love Brandon Wood and definitely think he's being underrated (especially by delusional baseball fans in the Great White North), but the fact that he's playing his 3rd season at AAA makes other teams wonder why the Angels won't play him when his competition is Aybar and Izturis.
Posted by: withpower | July 09, 2009 at 02:25 PM
Didn't realize just how incredible Knapp's periphs were.
How about Brown/Drabek/Marson/Donald/Knapp
Although I suspect the jays will want Carrasco as well.
Posted by: The_Bunk | July 09, 2009 at 01:43 PM
sorry you don't get Drabek and Knapp. That to me sounds too much like the Bedard trade from last year and we know how that worked out.
I'd stop at Drabek, Brown, Donald, Marson, Savery. That should be more than enough.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | July 09, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Withpower,
That was Conger's knock, he was in the weight room at the Angels complex all winter, and spent some time in Latin America. He's stayed healthy this entire year and has plyed the best defense of any catcher in AA (from what I hear). Scouts are raving about his power and discipline at such a young age. Conger's problems health and defensively are in the past.
s for Wood, the reason he's in AAA is organizational philosophy. Mike Scioscia prefers defensively skilled small ball players. He prefers slap hitters over power hitters. Look at the evidence, Aybar, Izturis, Quinlan, Mathis.....
Meanwhile Napoli only shares the catching duties because Mathis can't top .200, Morales was only brought in at 1B as a worst case scenario of losing Kotch and Tex came about, Wood is stuck down at AAA despite being able to play SS,3B and 1B and has even volunteered for OF and catching duty. Scioscia literally ha to find ways to keep him out of the lineup.
Posted by: Scott | July 09, 2009 at 03:04 PM
"The Angels don't have the elite level talent to get Halladay."
Yes they do. More than most teams.
The most ignorant statement I heard came a few days ago when someone actually used the fact that most of the Angels' prospects in their lineup haven't had a full major league season.
Um, that's because the Angels prospects have to constantly battle for their starting positions.
Just like USC Football.
All it took to get Mark Teixeira was Casey Kotchman. And I'm sure most teams would rather have Tex than Doc, because Tex will fill the seats EVERY day as opposed to every 5th day.
It will take a few more than Kotch to get Doc, but the Angels would make the Blue Jays very happy.
Jays need a SS, 3B (Rolen is on the market), and a Catcher for starters.
Erick Aybar, Brandon Wood, and Jeff Mathis, and one starting pitcher (O'Sullivan, Loux, etc.) for Roy Halladay.
Jays are crazy if they ask for any starting pitcher or position player that is part of the core of any team.
Angels are probably one of the best-suited teams to make a trade for Roy Halladay.
Posted by: XxRyana.k.a.RufusxX | July 09, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Wood's problem isnt Scioscia trying to keep him out of the lineup?? Its because Izturis is batting .300, Aybar is hitting in the .280s, Figgins is batting .300, and Morales is batting in the .280s and has hit 14 hrs. Were getting good production from all of them so there is no use in calling up Wood right now.
And as for Napoli, The reason he splits time is because his defense is not near Mathis. I agree that Napoli is the better catcher but i can see where Scioscia comes from because Napoli is only throwing 24% out right now.
Posted by: HalosFan777 | July 09, 2009 at 03:48 PM
"As for Wood, the reason he's in AAA is organizational philosophy."
Look at the lineup right now and the amount of power there is from the #2 spot (Abreu) to the #7 spot (Napoli).
That lineup has come together and has quickly moved from 11th in the AL in Runs to 5th in just 4 weeks. And its not by slap hitting.
Brandon Wood is in AAA because there is no room for him.
Napoli and Mathis share catching duties, because Napoli is a slugger with questionable defensive ability, while Mathis is good defensively but has questionable offensive abilities.
The question there is whether you take the good offensive catcher, or the good defensive catcher?
Angels have so many pieces that no one's starting spot is secure unless they are consistent.
Posted by: XxRyana.k.a.RufusxX | July 09, 2009 at 03:53 PM
although Mathis isnt doing to great himself...
Right now Napoli should be playing more.
But Scioscia likes Mathis to play at home where he hits much much better than usual. Thats another reason why he plays more.
But like Scott said..The Angels have the peices to acquire Halladay if they want to. But Reagins doesnt like to trade the Farm
Posted by: HalosFan777 | July 09, 2009 at 03:57 PM
Erick Aybar might be the key component of a Roy Halladay trade because he's hitting .280 and has vastly improved, and no matter who they trade Doc to/for, the Jays are getting a SS for their future plans.
Posted by: XxRyana.k.a.RufusxX | July 09, 2009 at 03:58 PM
Brandon Wood
Catcher with a career .196/.275/.320/.594 (55 OPS+) line over 735 PA
UI type with career .268/.306/.356/.661 (73 OPS+) line over 880 PA
and a choice of two unimpressive pitchers.
For Halladay? You mean Roy Halladay? Or were you thinking Millwood or Westbrook - because it could actually get you Millwood or Westbrook.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 04:04 PM
Brandon Wood
Erick Aybar(25 yrs old) whos batting .280 in his first 2 seasons as a STARTER. so the .268 you bring up doesnt mean much.
Mathis
Sean O'Sullivan(21 yrs old) career in minors 36-19 3.61 ERA and in his first 4 starts in Majors hes 2-0 with a 3.80 ERA
Lots of room to work with on this kid, so unimpressive- WRONG AGAIN
Jordan Walden(21 yrs old) Angels top pitching prospect
That should be more than enough to work with for the Jays. 2 young Impressive pitchers, a young SS, A power infielder, and a Catcher that needs some hitting lessons haha
Posted by: HalosFan777 | July 09, 2009 at 04:30 PM
"Erick Aybar(25 yrs old) whos batting .280 in his first 2 seasons as a STARTER. so the .268 you bring up doesnt mean much."
I do hope you realize BA is rather useless. If you want to talk about his two years starting, then fine
.279/.319/.380/.699 82 OPS+
That is downright horrendous. When you post a .279 BA and only have a .319 OBP, you are probably not long for the game in anything other then a bench roll.
"Mathis"
No comment huh? Thought so.
"Sean O'Sullivan(21 yrs old) career in minors 36-19 3.61 ERA and in his first 4 starts in Majors hes 2-0 with a 3.80 ERA
Lots of room to work with on this kid, so unimpressive- WRONG AGAIN"
O'Sullivan is nothing that special. His FIP is 4.73, meaning remove the plus defense behind him and him from the pitchers park, and you have league average production. Couple years in the minors and he might turn out to be an ok arm, but he isnt something that impressive right now.
And you omitted his mention of Loux. Thought so.
So no, Wood/Aybar/Mathis/O’Sullivan/Walden does not give the Jays even a fraction of the value being talked about elseware. That is quantity, not quality – it wont get it done. And that is even an increase from the deal originally proposed by the other guy.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 04:53 PM
As for the Phils, I believe there are 2 players off limits: Drabek & Taylor. The 2 that would be tough to part with: Happ (creates another hole in rotation) & Knapp. Carrasco or Savery, Donald, Marson, & Brown. If that can't get it done then the Phils should be fine with what they have to get them their 3rd straight division title. Come playoffs a 3 man rotation of Hamels, Happ, & Blanton might be enough, provided the bats don't go stone cold.
Posted by: BrianD | July 09, 2009 at 05:23 PM
Aybar needs a little plate discipline which has grown each year. Hes improving and hes still young
Mathis is a major league catcher thats needs to focus on hitting, but the defense is there. Hes a nice peice to add to the deal.
Any pitcher that does not have a defense behind him is going to struggle. O'Sullivan being 21 and pitching in the Majors effectively is a big plus.
Wood and Walden are 2 top of the line prospects right there. Add a major league ready SS and C, plus another arm that could emerge into a 2 or 3 and you have a very good deal.
This is also without mentioning many other peices if they want to. If the Angels absolutely wanted to, they could put Reckling or Santana or Weaver or Saunders in the deal. They could add Sean Rodriguez, Howie Kendrick, or Izturis. Conger could be added as well. They have many many peices that make the Angels a top candidate to land Roy. Thats the point im getting at, people are saying we dont have enough, but that is not true. If we want Halladay we can get him.
And i agree, Loux is not worth mentioning in that last deal because being 29 already i find him a hit or miss guy and i do not think he is of use to the Jays
Posted by: HalosFan777 | July 09, 2009 at 05:28 PM
"They have many many peices that make the Angels a top candidate to land Roy. Thats the point im getting at, people are saying we dont have enough, but that is not true. If we want Halladay we can get him."
No one said otherwise, but those "pieces", like other have told you, would almost certainly have to include Weaver or Santana to best the packages being tossed around by others - something they wouldnt be willing to do. So where even though they can, they really cant. Just like the Yankees, RedSox and Dodgers - what it would cost them would be important parts off the ML roster and hurt more then it is worth.
Posted by: SuzysMan | July 09, 2009 at 06:53 PM
The Angels have nowhere near enough pieces to get Halladay!
Posted by: RED SOX DYNASTY! | July 11, 2009 at 05:28 PM
Rumors have it that the Angels and Brewers lead the way to Halladay.
The Angels have a lot to offer with pre-exsisting talent they are willing to give up for Halladay.
But with what the Brewers have in their farm systems and the instant success Gamel has brought to the club so far is going to be really hard to compete against.
Also, Catcher Brett Lowrie has shown sustancial power and improvement in the farm system of Milwaukee.
Don't forget about Alcides Escobar who adds huge speed to the base paths and also a top 5 glove at shortstop in the minors last year. The kid can get on base, he's the real package from the Crew.
These 3 guys are looking in the eyes of The Brewers future stars along with Braun and Fielder.
Posted by: sabathgod | July 12, 2009 at 05:26 PM
The Angels are very much in a position to make a play for Halladay if they so choose, and have the talent to put something compelling together; however...
1) As exhibited in the Miguel Cabrera sweepstakes a couple of years ago, the Angels aren't in the business of getting absolutely fleeced by the GM who knows how to find trading partners who are "just one pitcher away from the World Series" (although they made a good effort);
2) I don't think Halladay will be moved by the trading deadline...if he is, it will be orchestrated from levels much higher than J.P. Ricciardi;
3) J.P. Ricciardi has very little leverage with the Angels, as he quite likely will be calling on Reagins for Assistant GM openings next year once Halladay is traded away (and even if he isn't if Tampa Bay finishes ahead two years straight);
But I do agree with the pessimistic Angel talent evaluators in one respect...the Angels don't have a WOW minor league arm to package in a deal that can't be offered by anyone else in the league.
All said, I don't see Halladay in an Angel uniform unless Reagins can make Ricciardi bend over for him. Since this won't be J.P.'s deal to do, such will not happen...
Posted by: BWare | July 13, 2009 at 05:15 PM