![]() |
|
|
| |
« Discussion: What's Next For Baltimore? | Main | Odds & Ends: Rays, Marlins, D'Backs »
In an informative post-mortem on the Braves, Mark Bowman of MLB.com reports that Atlanta General Manager Frank Wren "is expected to explore the possibility of trading [Derek] Lowe, who is owed $45MM over the final three years of his contract."
The idea makes a ton of sense for Atlanta. With multiple needs, and a surplus of starters, the Braves should certainly jettison one in an effort to add a first baseman, outfielder and/or help in the bullpen.
The question is less about why Atlanta would deal Lowe, and more why anyone would want to deal for him at his price.
Lowe is coming off of a season with a 4.67 ERA along with a strikeout rate of just 5.1 per nine innings. He certainly didn't finish strong, with a 5.05 second-half ERA, and a 6,23 mark from September 1 on. And that $15MM per season will pay for Lowe's age-37, age-38 and age-39 campaigns.
Even if Lowe had pitched extremely well in 2009, it is hard to imagine that many teams could afford him. And of those teams, both the Yankees and Red Sox would hardly want to ask a pitcher with a declining strikeout rate to switch leagues.
It will be fascinating to see if the Braves can find a trading partner for Lowe. They can always make the argument, "He's just a year removed from a 3.24 ERA!" But those arguments never seem to result in renaissance seasons. A lot can change with a year removed. After all, Jon and Kate are just a year removed from being "happily married television stars."
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Thanks Howard....I used to come here to get away from Jon & Kate & the exploited Eight! =)
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | October 05, 2009 at 07:02 PM
I said this was a bad signing before the ink dried. Looks like I'm right if the Braves are looking to dump him after one year.
Posted by: icedrake523 | October 05, 2009 at 07:05 PM
Really? Jon and Kate + Derek Lowe
Posted by: bsalamon | October 05, 2009 at 07:06 PM
If the Braves could do a Rios with Lowe I would be all for it.
If we could save 15M we could resign LaRoche and trade for Uggla and still have pleny left over to lock up both Soriano and Gonzo.
Boston seems like the most likely landing spot due to their question marks after their top three, history with Lowe, and recent forays in willing to take chances with upside pitchers.
Posted by: bbxxj | October 05, 2009 at 07:10 PM
I'm not sure this is crazy, but how about lowe to the mets for nothing. Mets need pitching, and we need to rid of lowe's salary. It would be odd to see another trade within the division, but the mets seem to want to spend money like the Yankees.
Posted by: WS2009 | October 05, 2009 at 07:11 PM
would a Lowe for Bradley swap work out?
Posted by: SosaCrackers | October 05, 2009 at 07:18 PM
Lowe to the Red Sox? Why would any American League team trade for him? He doesn't have the stuff to succeed there. Lowe and 9 million back to the Dodgers for a couple of low level prospects makes sense to me. Lowe for 3 years and 36 million isn't too bad. It's what he should of signed for last year.
Posted by: NEBravesfan33 | October 05, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Great idea by WS2009. Derek Lowe would pitch much better in Citi Field. If the Mets take most of his salary, maybe a marginal prospect would work. Nick Evans comes to mind as the Mets will never play him for some reason.
Posted by: metfan57 | October 05, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Whoever has Dave Duncan coaching for them next season (it may not be the Redbirds) should consider it, if Atlanta is willing to pay some of Lowe's salary.
Posted by: Christian Seehausen | October 05, 2009 at 07:29 PM
if lowe is dealt, the braves will either pick up a poor contract in return or pay a lot of salary relief. personally, i think a deal with the cubs could take place. milton bradley and derek lee for kelly johnson, ryan church, and derek lowe.
cubs then move fox to first, kelly johnson to 2nd, and ryan church as a 4th outfielder.
if bobby cox is the "greatest people manager of all time", then what better way to test him in his last year than milton bradley? aside from the lack of closer, this trade would satisfy all the braves needs.
after the dust settles from that trade, the braves would be left with about 8-10 million dollars to either re-sign one of gonzalez or soriano, or gamble on a cheap closer like wagner or...dare i say, smoltz? smoltz did come out and say that he thinks he's better suited for the pen now during a fox day game last month.
Posted by: ryan c | October 05, 2009 at 07:30 PM
Ordonez for Lowe
Posted by: Rob M. | October 05, 2009 at 07:30 PM
WS2009, what do you mean the Mets seem to want to spend money? I keep hearing they're going to cut their payroll and that Wilpon lost a good deal of money in the Madoff scandal.
Posted by: fitz | October 05, 2009 at 07:32 PM
i am awaiting bashing from both cubs and braves fans...
Posted by: ryan c | October 05, 2009 at 07:32 PM
The day the Braves get Milton Bradley is the day I quit watching Braves baseball. I can not stand Milton.
I still vote for the KJ and Lowe for Carlos Lee trade.
Posted by: Chief Tomahawk | October 05, 2009 at 07:36 PM
WS2009, what do you mean the Mets seem to want to spend money? I keep hearing they're going to cut their payroll and that Wilpon lost a good deal of money in the Madoff scandal.
Posted by: fitz | October 05, 2009 at 07:32 PM
Their COO just said they'll let the payroll be whatever it needs to be. No one knows for sure how much they lost to Madoff. The team and SNY are a source of revenue for them so they are making money back.
Posted by: icedrake523 | October 05, 2009 at 07:37 PM
the mets arent gonna take lowe and his contract. the mets need a real #2 starter like halladay or lackey. lowe is a #3-4 starter at best.
Posted by: metsfan08 | October 05, 2009 at 07:38 PM
That trade wouldn't work, especially given Church and KJ most likely won't return to the braves next season
Posted by: WS2009 | October 05, 2009 at 07:39 PM
I'm willing to eat half of Lowe's contract if we somehow get a legit power bat.
Posted by: HeywardTheFuture | October 05, 2009 at 07:40 PM
I was thinking about the last post about the Mets being players for big free agents, where there was a comment saying that Miniya will be supplied with whatever he needs.
Posted by: WS2009 | October 05, 2009 at 07:41 PM
OF COURSE Lowe is for sale. Actually Lowe should be free; it's his contract that'll cost. This deal was destined to have "regret" written all over it, but good god, after just the first year? I'm pretty sure he'll be a Brave next year & fairly certain he'll pick it back up. He's still a workhorse.
Posted by: drphonic7 | October 05, 2009 at 07:41 PM
"That trade wouldn't work, especially given Church and KJ most likely won't return to the braves next season."
both players are still under team control. they could be traded and the new team will have to deal with that issue. as of now, they are under team control and are still braves.
Posted by: ryan c | October 05, 2009 at 07:47 PM
ryan c
Where are you getting $8-10 million from. Bradley has 2 years and $21 million remaining, $10 million in 2010 and $11 million in 2011. Lee has 1 year and $13 million left. Lowe has 3 years and $45 million left at $15 million a season. Johnson is arb. eligable and should make around $3.5 million. Church is also arb. eligable and should make $3-3.5 million. We would be taking $23 million from the Cubs in 2010. We would give them $22 million.
Not only that but the Cubs would never do that trade. There not going to give Lee away for a overpayed aging pitcher, a bad 2B and a 4th outfielder. Lee is a good player.
Posted by: jtd | October 05, 2009 at 07:47 PM
I see the post you're alluding to now, interesting. I still don't think that they should take on Lowe's contract with nothing in return. He doesn't have top of the rotation stuff although he would probably make a formidable #3 in Citi Field but at $15M per I would not risk it.
Posted by: fitz | October 05, 2009 at 07:48 PM
bbxxj, boston won't take lowe and how do they have question mark in the rotation? Their top 3 guys are all aces, clay buckholz gonna be number 4 and they will probably sign a free agent for number 5. lowe to mets won't make sense either like metsfan08 said mets need another ace behind santana.
Posted by: antor | October 05, 2009 at 07:50 PM
lowe for milton bradely could work.
Posted by: antor | October 05, 2009 at 07:51 PM
Here's the breakdown:
Vazquez 12
Hudson 10
Chipper 13
Kawakami7.33
Mccann 5.67
Mclouth 5
Infante 1.85
Ross 1.6
Diaz 3
Jurrjens0.5
Escobar 0.5
Prado 0.5
Moylan 1
Medlen 0.5
schafer 0.5
Hanson 0.5
Heyward 0.5
Conrad 0.5
O'Flaherty 0.5
lee 13
bradley 10
87.95 mil
after the mclouth trade, the braves payroll was probably aroud 98 million. if the front office is looking to stay right at that level, then the braves have 10 million to work with.
kj has been a good 2b, and was very good this year after his rehab in the minors. the cubs 2b options stink. the cubs are going to have to take on a poor contract to trade bradley. fox is their 1st baseman of the future (probably) and derek lee is in his last year of his contract. it's really not that far-fetched of an idea for the cubs to consider.
do i think this will happen? absolutely not, but it's still fun to dream big.
Posted by: ryan c | October 05, 2009 at 07:55 PM
the mets arent gonna take lowe and his contract. the mets need a real #2 starter like halladay or lackey. lowe is a #3-4 starter at best.
Posted by: metsfan08 | October 05, 2009 at 07:38 PM
Their rotation after Santana is open. No one deserves to be guaranteed a spot.
Posted by: icedrake523 | October 05, 2009 at 07:55 PM
Pretty sure someone just called Halladay a #2 starter. What?
Lowe has some serious negative equity right now. Eat a bunch of cash and you might get a good prospect back.
Last check the demand for over 35 pitchers, coming off a year in which he posted an ERA over 4.5 in the NL is pretty limited. Even with the Braves eat $5m/year it's hard to envision who the suitors might be.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 05, 2009 at 07:56 PM
Yeah, I see what you guys are talking about, but the only 'ace' in the FA is really Lackey, and there's a number of teams in the running for him. If that doesn't work out, they're still going to need someone in the rotation to be successful next year, lowe could help them out.
Posted by: WS2009 | October 05, 2009 at 07:56 PM
Wait antor, Dice-K is still an ace? Did I miss something?
Top of the rotation
Beckett
Lester
Buchholz
Quality depth with some question marks
Dice-K
Lowe
Wakefield
Bowden
Thats an expensive way to build a staff but it would give BOS a great chance to survive a whole season intact.
Posted by: bbxxj | October 05, 2009 at 08:02 PM
WS2009, $15 million for a #4 starter. wouldn't you rather sign harden, sheets or bedard. i don't think the mets should sign lackey. they can get harden and sheets with the $15 million.
Posted by: antor | October 05, 2009 at 08:05 PM
bbxxj, boston won't take lowe and how do they have question mark in the rotation? Their top 3 guys are all aces, clay buckholz gonna be number 4 and they will probably sign a free agent for number 5. lowe to mets won't make sense either like metsfan08 said mets need another ace behind santana."
I give you Lester, duh, and Beckett. But who else? Dice-K? HAHAHA. He is not an ace and is VERY far from it. Stop living in a fantasy.
And if you cant spell Buccholz correct, maybe you shouldnt use him in your argument.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | October 05, 2009 at 08:05 PM
All of those guys carry a very high injury risk, and that is NOT what the Mets need after an injury plagued season.
As for lowe to boston, I can't see the sox taking a chance on a guy that old after Smoltz.
Posted by: WS2009 | October 05, 2009 at 08:08 PM
And if you cant spell Buccholz correct, maybe you shouldnt use him in your argument.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | October 05, 2009 at 08:05 PM
You didn't spell it right, either.
Posted by: icedrake523 | October 05, 2009 at 08:14 PM
"you didn't spell it right, either"
Hahaha. Embaaarraasssiinngg.
Posted by: WS2009 | October 05, 2009 at 08:16 PM
Yeah I think the original guy spelled it right all along. Regardless, why not put a sinkerballer behind the best defensive team possible in a pitchers park? He would work in Seattle on a straight salary dump.
Posted by: marfons | October 05, 2009 at 08:25 PM
Here's the thing. Very few teams were willing to give Lowe a 3/36 contract LAST SEASON. Since then he has been horrible and is nowhere close to that value. So unless the Braves are willing to pick a majority or the contract and not get anything in return.....then forget about a move.
Posted by: bigpupp | October 05, 2009 at 08:30 PM
let me help everyone out, its Buchholz
Posted by: csg | October 05, 2009 at 08:32 PM
Just to put this out there its Buchholz
Posted by: NYYLastPlace4ever | October 05, 2009 at 08:32 PM
let me help everyone out, its Buchholz
Posted by: csg | October 05, 2009 at 08:32 PM
Lol
Posted by: NYYLastPlace4ever | October 05, 2009 at 08:33 PM
posted it at the same time
Posted by: NYYLastPlace4ever | October 05, 2009 at 08:34 PM
ok now every one knows it's Buchholz right? :)
Posted by: Chief Tomahawk | October 05, 2009 at 08:51 PM
So are you saying its Buchholz?
I'd think any team with a really bad contract might want to contact the Tigers or Cubs. Somewhere on those two teams you can probably find a really bad one that suits your teams needs better.
Or, if you get really desperate, Lowe for Gary Matthews Jr? (Are Angels fan afraid that Reagins may dump that asolutely hideous deal once and for all, but for Milton Bradley?)
Posted by: notin | October 05, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Or, if you get really desperate, Lowe for Gary Matthews Jr? (Are Angels fan afraid that Reagins may dump that asolutely hideous deal once and for all, but for Milton Bradley?)
Posted by: notin | October 05, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Lowe wasn't THAT bad. We'll keep Lowe if that's all we get in return.
Posted by: Chief Tomahawk | October 05, 2009 at 09:32 PM
i dont think its a bad idea, lowe to the mets with salary relief and a decent prospect. possible #3?
Posted by: clos79 | October 05, 2009 at 09:42 PM
Ollie Perez for Lowe? Fun thought if nothing else.
Posted by: Mikefromkewgardens | October 05, 2009 at 09:47 PM
Ollie Perez for Lowe? Fun thought if nothing else.
Posted by: Mikefromkewgardens | October 05, 2009 at 09:47 PM
"After all, Jon and Kate are just a year removed from being "happily married television stars.""
I say this from the bottom of my heart, and with complete sincerity. Die in a fire.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | October 05, 2009 at 09:50 PM
Forget Lowe heading to Boston, or the AL East for that matter. He has become another member of the "NL only" cadre and pitching against brutal teams like the NYY? There is a reason the Sox just asked cursory questions last year and never made any offer for him.. They had him when his "stuff" was still passable for the AL and 5 years later, it's not anymore.
While the Red Sox probably will go fishing for a reclamation project like Wade Miller, Brad Penny, John Smoltz, Roberto Colon, they do not go out and pay outrageous amounts, like Lowe is owed for a pitcher who would probably not be able to even produce fair results at best in the AL any longer.
Far less than that outlay could allow them to give injured starters like Bedard a shot with the shoulder strengthening program the Sox have and works well and have much better results, plus maybe even Harden would be better for a 5IP vs Lowe.
There is an abundance of pitchers available that cost far less than what Lowe would cost and Boston already know 1st hand what his off field problems are.. The hard way..
Posted by: johns | October 05, 2009 at 10:01 PM
Lowe is a solid starter. He did win the most games on the team. But he is not the guy that gets $15 mil a season. But you look at his history and he has only had 3 seasons in the past 10 years where his ERA was over 4.
If Atlanta paid $15 m or so remain on the contract they could get something decent. If he could pitch in the AL East I could see Baltimore making a deal for him. They need a veteran.
Posted by: XXIII | October 05, 2009 at 10:02 PM
Little off subject but how about Kelly Johnson and Manny Acosta for Conner Jackson?
Posted by: Jay212033 | October 05, 2009 at 10:55 PM
Nobody wants Lowe for that contract, and nobody wants Kelly Johnson to play for their team period.
And do people really think that you need to be a better pitcher for the AL? I'll grant you that the ERA will be slightly inflated between the leagues given the DH, but do people see AL pitchers as actually throwing better overall?
Posted by: agonzo23 | October 05, 2009 at 11:12 PM
KJ has a bad rep now after Braves fans wanted to keep him instead of trading him for Ludwick last year? He has potential and everyone knows that but Bobby adores Prado and Infante is an outstanding player.
Lowe to the Royals for Guillen. Moore always wants to steal from the Braves. It would get him away from us.
I could see Royals/BoSox/Padres(say what you will)/Rangers being interested. Maybe more it we eat some contract.
We need to get rid of him. Plain and simple. He would dominate in Colorado I feel. Don't know why.
Posted by: insomniac | October 06, 2009 at 12:27 AM
Dude, pass what you're smoking. Livan Hernandez will win a Cy Young before KJ and Ryan Ludwick ever get traded for each other. I remember that rumor from last year, and I thought that the speculation itself was completely false?
Okay, but on point. Lowe hasn't really been as bad as his numbers suggest. In fact, I'd say he's been pretty average, however he's getting paid like an ace, which is why he's had such a disappointing season.
FIP is 4.06 with a BABIP at .330 (which is kinda high). However you can't deny that he has regressed with his K/9 going from 6.27 in 2008 to 5.13 in 2009. Also his BB/9 up from 1.92 to 2.91, indicating that he's lost a little control, though not that much. His GB% is down as well.
I say the Braves give him another shot. Going into 2010, on paper the Braves have the best looking starting rotation in the NL, and maybe even all of baseball with Vazquez, Lowe, Hudson, Jurjens, and Hanson.
Posted by: BKuGotIt | October 06, 2009 at 12:48 AM
Sure KJ has potential, if you consider a 27 y.o. who hit .224 "potential". Whatever rumored trades KJ last offseason pale in comparison to the stinker of a season we all just saw. There is good reason why Bobby Cox has chose Prado over KJ, Cox is no dummy.
Certainly there will be plenty of suitors for Lowe if the Braves eat at least half of the contract, but I never thought of the Braves as an org being able to do that. But I could be wrong. Even still, he is 36 y.o. and also coming off a bad season.
Posted by: agonzo23 | October 06, 2009 at 02:08 AM
Wren was able to find a taker for the worst position player in baseball, Jeff Francoeur. If he a) doesn't require much back in the trade and b) chips in a modest amount of money, he should be able to trade Lowe. It would be well worth it to the Braves to pay $3-4 million a year over the next 3 years not to have Lowe as part of the rotation. They could then decline Hudson's option and re-sign him to an affordable lower cost extension with the money saved from Lowe's salary.
Posted by: Ron Edwards | October 06, 2009 at 06:13 AM
The last line was quite out of character for a MLBTradeRumors post...but ok.
There are too many teams needing pitching for people to scoff at Mr. Lowe. The guy did win 15 games for us and started the season reasonably strong enough. If we cant trade him (which I am sure we can) then it isnt going to be actually a horrible thing to have him on our staff again next year.
I think the one pitcher that might be viable would be Vasquez. I dont want to lose him...but teams are going to attempt to move Wren in the direction of the trade talks from Lowe to him. He would provide a decent return...more so than Lowe. Lowe would ultimately be a salary dump w/ the hopes of gaining a prospect, bullpen help, or outfield utility/platoon guy.
Posted by: jadarm | October 06, 2009 at 06:15 AM
Lowe was a funny pitcher this year (before September, during which he was just bad, no way around it). His numbers weren't very good, but they were really plagued by a handful of really poor starts. He had a boat load of nice 1,2, or 3 run outings, but then he'd go out and get blown up for 6 or 7 runs once in a while. Personally I would rather have a pitcher that gives me a very good chance to win 4 out of 5 starts than one who sorta gets hit around every time he takes the hill. But to each his own on that aspect I guess.
I agree with the post earlier that was referencing a trade for Gary Matthews or someone horrible, I forget.. the poster said, "Lowe was not THAT bad." I agree.. he wasn't great, but good Lord, our rotation isn't so deep that we should just throw him in the waste bin and count on Kawakami or someone to pick up the slack.
I would like to trade him, pay a few million a year on his contract, and try to get something decent back. Wren will have his work cut out for him on this one.
Posted by: CottonNash | October 06, 2009 at 08:00 AM
Like CottonNash said Lowe did a pretty good job keeping the Braves in most ballgames.
In 26 of his 34 games started he allowed 3 or less ER.
I know wins is a very flawed stat but he did win 15 games so it says a little bit about how he conistantly kept the team in games.
Posted by: bbxxj | October 06, 2009 at 08:36 AM
And if you cant spell Buccholz correct, maybe you shouldnt use him in your argument.
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | October 05, 2009 at 08:05 PM
And......if you can't spell Bucholz correctly maybe you shouldn't attempt to correct someone who mispelled it...
Money's too tight out there, no one is trading for Lowe unless there's some serious salary relief.
God bless Lowe for getting what he got last year, but sure looks like a painful deal for the Braves.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | October 06, 2009 at 08:42 AM
I doubt seriously that the Braves would agree to take on any of Lowe's contract. They may take on a bad hitter's contract on in return...but they won't just pay someone to take Lowe. That's not how the Braves FO typically operates.
Someone here mentioned previously about a trade to Houston for Carlos Lee. A bad contract for a bad contract. A team that needs pitching desperately and a team that needs hitting desperately. It could be a match.
Btw, the Braves would never take on Milton Bradley. He is too much of a head case.
Posted by: BravesAllTheWay | October 06, 2009 at 08:43 AM
I would like to see this happen:
1. Braves trade Lowe to Team A who accept 10-15M per year in salary and send a prospect in return according the the salary taken on.
2. Make a (maybe not so)crazy three way trade with the Marlins and Twins.
Twins recieve: Martin Prado
Braves recieve: Dan Uggla and Jorge Cantu
Marlins recieve: JoJo Reyes, Cody Gearrin, Team A prospect, prospects from Twins, and if needed more upside low minors prospects from the Braves.
It has been reported here that the fish are wanting to move their expensive position players and I think they would like some cheap solid starters/pen guys in return. The Twins have holes at 2B/3B and at #2 spot and Prado can play both 2B and 3B and could score 100R hitting in the #2 in front of Mauer/Morneau/Kubel.
The Braves however have four player who could handle the #2 spot (McLouth/Schafer/Prado/Diaz) but noone really to hit #4. Adding Uggla and his 30 right handed homers would really complete our lineup.
1. Schafer/Diaz CF/LF
2. McLouth/Diaz CF/LF
3. Chipper 3B
4. Uggla 2B (sign to an extention)
5. McCann C
6. Escobar SS
7. Heyward RF
8. Cantu 1B (one year stopgap to Freeman)
Posted by: bbxxj | October 06, 2009 at 08:49 AM
Lowe plus 7M to White Sox for Rios and Jenks.
Posted by: rockford | October 06, 2009 at 09:01 AM
No one is going to take Lowe's contract. Wren had to do something to make the stupid fans happy so he went out and signed him. We are going to have to bite the bullet and keep him around. What we need is ownership that will open the checkbook a little.
Posted by: rocker4president | October 06, 2009 at 09:01 AM
The article was good until you mentioned John and Kate.
Like the swine flu, I wish those two would just go away.
Posted by: Hellion | October 06, 2009 at 09:17 AM
This very article reminds me of why I don't read Bowman. Inability or lack of desire to think things through when writing.
Posted by: UncleMo | October 06, 2009 at 09:40 AM
bbxj,
As a big fan of the Marlins, it does pain me each year to watch them have the inevitable "fire sales" following each campaign.
I seriously doubt under any circumstances that the Fish would be willing to give Atlanta Uggla AND Cantu for a couple of prospects, no matter how touted.
You want to try to give the Braves the best lineup in the NL by adding those 2? You better start adding.. Like Jurrjens or another good starter.
Posted by: johns | October 06, 2009 at 10:22 AM
I like a Magglio Ordonez for Lowe swap but Braves may have to throw in some money in the future and I don't see that happening. However, adding Milton Bradley with the Cubs eating a significant portion of his salary seems like a fit. Even if the Braves take on Bradley and $3M-4M per year of his remaining contract they will save a large amount of money by unloading Lowe. In addition, getting a reasonable (obviously not spectacular) pitcher and a team to pick up some of the contract might be the best offer the Cubs receive. And, in the end, if the Braves have to release Bradley because of issues, it is at a much more reasonable cost.
Posted by: jcrinck | October 06, 2009 at 10:33 AM
Johns,
While Uggla and Cantu are nice players, there is no way in hell the Braves are trading Jurrjens and "another good pitcher" for those two. Uggla plays horrible defense, and doesn't hit for better than a 250 average despite all the homeruns, and Cantu while a nice scrappy little player isn't in the league of warranting a guy like Jurrjens. If the Braves explore the idea of trading Jurrjens and another really good piece, then it is going to be for a big right handed power guy who will hit for average and power. Someone like say a Prince Fielder or a Ryan Braun. Doubtful I am sure that the Braves get either one of those guys, but that is the type of player they would want to entertain the idea of trading a stud pitcher who is cheap and controllable for the next 4 years. Jurrjens likely stays in Atlanta.
Posted by: desertbrave | October 06, 2009 at 10:59 AM
The Braves are also not going to give Lowe to the Mets for "nothing".
Posted by: desertbrave | October 06, 2009 at 11:03 AM
I think johns spells it out best in his first post: no one's going to pay that high of a price ($15 mil) for the mediocre pitcher that Lowe has become; there are just plenty of other, cheaper options. I don't think it's a bad idea to make it known that Lowe is "available," (the Mets did take Francoeur off of Atlanta's hands after all), but it's likely that the Braves will be keeping Lowe.
Posted by: drphonic7 | October 06, 2009 at 11:48 AM
Lowe is untradable! There are only a handful of teams that might pay B-level starting pitchers $15 million a year. While there are certainly teams that could use Lowe, he is simply way to expensive - expecially for a guy 36 years old with three more years on his contract and coming off a so-so season.
I cannot imagine the Braves writing another team a check for $25-30 million or so just to take Lowe - but that's what they would have to do.
I think Derek Lowe is still a good starting pitcher and if he had only year left he might be attractive. But, this is not fantasy baseball!
Seriously, what MLB team wants to pay Lowe $15 million for the next three seasons, given that he is 36 and appears to be on the decline?
Posted by: bernie | October 06, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Put him on waivers and hope a team claims him like a team claimed Rios.
Posted by: MLB in the Know | October 06, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Cantu sucks. Uggla is a slightly better player, but not as good as everybody thinks, or as everybody really thought last year. I think this is more of what he is, a .240-.250/.330-.340/..450-.460 type hitter who plays horrible defense. He is valuable, just not really as valuable as he was last year. If Cantu is playing a corner, he stinks.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 06, 2009 at 02:36 PM
I know wins is a very flawed stat..." - you should have stopped right there. It is a worhtless stat so no, it doesn't say anything about anything.
The quality of lineups in the AL is better overall than the NL,regardless of DH. Lowe still has some value but up until now, one of his main selling points is how well he has pitched in the postseason. And, if you don't make the postseason, that is irrelevent of course.
Another thing to consider when comparing his stats from 2008 is the park effect. Dodger stadium is a pitcher's park.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | October 07, 2009 at 01:11 PM