![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cards Interested In Holliday, Have Other Options | Main | Rangers Won't Pursue Top Free Agents, Will Deal »
Some links for Tuesday morning...
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
As a Yankee fan. You can keep Felix for that price. We have a battle tested Ace in CC.
Posted by: Mike | November 10, 2009 at 09:00 AM
200 mil??!?!?! That is insane just to think about. As good as he is at that price I don't think I would want him if I were a Yankee fan.
Posted by: BabyJesus | November 10, 2009 at 09:03 AM
200 mil??!?!?! That is insane just to think about. As good as he is at that price I don't think I would want him if I were a Yankee fan.
Posted by: BabyJesus | November 10, 2009 at 09:03 AM
I don't think you know just how good Felix is..plus he's 23. 23! And he's an ace on any team already.
Posted by: humannature | November 10, 2009 at 09:06 AM
It would be nice to see Bobby V back in MLB this season. He deserves a managerial job, probably one better than the Nats, but at least it's something.
I think the Hernandez price tag floated there is pretty baseless. Once you creep much over $150 million for a pitcher (or any player, really), the likelihood of getting burned is higher than not.
Posted by: Invader3K | November 10, 2009 at 09:07 AM
"why Felix Hernandez would consider signing long-term with the Mariners when the Yankees could conceivably offer $200M"
Uh, maybe he'd just like to play for a team that doesn't have to buy the WS championship to win.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 10, 2009 at 09:09 AM
Mike- As a Yankees fan, does price even matter anymore? I mean it was made quite clear last offseason that it is about adding the guys, and the price tag is irrelevant.
Outside of that, I'd recommend Joel take a look at Freddy Garcia, Darren Dreifort, Jason Schmidt, and any other pitcher who was in a similar position and signed the long term deal prior to getting seriously hurt.
If the Ms are offering somewhere around 150M right now, he better take it. The down side risk of hoping to stay healthy for 2 years is far greater than the upside (200M). If he goes Tommy John next year, or (closer to home) Eric Bedard, in two years he'll be on this site as a 26 year old "buy-low candidate", talking 2 year, 10M dollar deals.
Big BIG risk.
I just threw these names out there, if they're bad examples of guys who took an extension or signed a long term deal just prior to injury, please advise.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 10, 2009 at 09:10 AM
@drphonic7 - unfortunately most players don't look at it the same as most fans.
if you're a player you probably want to play where you can make the most money and have the best surrounding team to win a championship. which will always be the Yankees unless the rules change.
as a fan, iit's insanely frustrating to watch.
Posted by: ThinkBlue | November 10, 2009 at 09:13 AM
Uh, maybe he'd just like to play for a team that doesn't have to buy the WS championship to win.
Posted by: drphonic7 | November 10, 2009 at 09:09 AM
Is there a team that doesn't have a payroll? (or never signs FAs?)
Why would he want to go to the Marlins?
Posted by: strikethree | November 10, 2009 at 09:14 AM
Buy Championships !.. yeah bud . >TELL YOUR OWNER to spend the money. instead of buying his brand new Yacht
Posted by: Mike | November 10, 2009 at 09:19 AM
Why wouldn't the Yankees sign him too? I mean they will be all over Joe Mauer so why not King Felix. To go with more than likely John Lackey and possibly Matt Holliday this year it just makes me sick. Why don't we just contrat all the teams except the Yanks and Red Sox and merge all the other teams together. Seems to be the only way...Kinda like the NHL All Star game- Yanks vs the rest of MLB.
Posted by: Trusting the Process | November 10, 2009 at 09:23 AM
I dislike the Yankees severely. Never did like them, I think alot of their fans are relatively unintelligent because every argument or discussion is answered with something related to "the pressure of New York", or " 26 (now 27) rings".
That said, it's really whiney and pathetic for folks to continue to waste energy crying about the whole buying a championship deal.
It is what they do, and for the better part of this decade is what they've done, and not going to change.
Get over it already and find a more intelligent beef.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 10, 2009 at 09:33 AM
I'm not a Yankee fan, but im getting tired of hearing people say..buying a championship.
Is there any way that we can see profits for a team instead of what they spend on payroll. Because i'm sure there are plenty of teams that can spend the money..but they just dont.
Like the Brewers for example there payroll last year was a lil over 80 million, but they are valued over 347 million. You telling me they cant add another 15-20 million? The Tigers spent over 115 million and they are only valued at 371 million. There are at least 5 clubs who are valued more than them but spent at least 20 million less.
Like someone else said....TELL YOUR OWNER to spend the money. instead of buying his brand new Yacht. Push comes to shove they do what the Marlins do...trade their star players for great prospects.
Posted by: Moses Magnum | November 10, 2009 at 09:38 AM
Didn't the Pirates receive $50MM++ in revenue sharing, yet put out a $29MM payroll?
This "bought the WS" crap is just that: crap. If they'd won 8 out of the last 10, you might have an argument.
And it's not like a salary cap really fixes anything, either. Look at the bad teams in the NFL (Raiders, Buccs, Lions)...they make the Nationals/Pirates/Royals look like perennial contenders by comparison.
Posted by: Timotheus | November 10, 2009 at 09:59 AM
dude do some research.. the Pirates alone received 50 million in revenue sharing???
Posted by: Adam | November 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM
How can anyone possibly defend the Yankees actions as anything other than buying a championship.
It is what it is, accept it, but don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining.
Posted by: Peter D | November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM
"26 (now 27) rings"
Actually 26. The souvenier for 1923 was a watch.
http://stadiumpage.com/WSRings/misc.html
(Scroll down a bit)
Posted by: jwb | November 10, 2009 at 10:12 AM
dude do some research.. the Pirates alone received 50 million in revenue sharing???
Posted by: Adam | November 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM
--------------------------
I heard it on the XM MLB late night show one night. I've been meaning to look into it, but I was sorta lazily hoping someone already knew the answer :)
Posted by: Timotheus | November 10, 2009 at 10:13 AM
The Yankees have been trying to buy a championship ever since the late 90s dynasty stopped producing.
The question is not whether they're doing it or not, it's like, why is it wrong for a company to leverage it's assets for success and profitability?
Billy Beane is trying to buy a championship too, by the way.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 10, 2009 at 10:13 AM
Okay, Adam, here you go:
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/article/132600
From the opening line...
"Some MLB teams this season are "rendering themselves non-competitive for the foreseeable future, all in the name of financial duress," and the league's revenue-sharing policy "rewards incompetent ownership," according to Bill Madden of the N.Y. DAILY NEWS. MLB last year transferred about $400M in revenue sharing and luxury tax, and the Indians received more than $20M while the Pirates -- "despite their beautiful, eight-year-old, taxpayer-funded stadium" -- received more than $40M."
Posted by: Timotheus | November 10, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Yankee fans/defenders.
Make a choice. It's either...
1. The Yankees do not buy championships.
or
2. The Yankees do buy championships but its completely within the rules, and smaller market teams should buy championships too.
---
p.s. the 96,98, and 00 Yankees all had the highest Payrolls in MLB. In 99 they had the second highest. Stop talking about this like it's a new thing. They've always offered the most money for players to play for them. Why do you think the league instituted the Draft?
Posted by: ThinkBlue | November 10, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Stop complaining about how the Yankees keep buying players. If you have a problem with it go to your teams owner and tell that person to reach into their pockets. We Yankee fans do not bitch about payroll and the price of the new Stadium because we go into our pockets and buy the tickets and demand that the owner puts out the best possible product. Yeah the tickets are pricey but if I want to see studs like CC, A-Rod, Tex etc. then I I have to pay for it and I for one do not mind. I have season tickets and enjoyed every minute of it. Go Yanks!
You fans and the owners of your favorite teams need to "buck" up or shut up.
Posted by: Mike Z | November 10, 2009 at 10:27 AM
ThinkBlue, all I can say is that I miss Ted Turner :(
Love,
-a lifelong Braves fan
Posted by: Timotheus | November 10, 2009 at 10:28 AM
@ MIke Z
with a brand new stadium, in the biggest city in the country, and the American League All Stars all in pinstripes, you couldn't even win the attendance record this year.
Posted by: ThinkBlue | November 10, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Your argument that the the other teams should increase their payroll because they have the assets and the money from revenue sharing is laughable. So let's look at the Brewers, they have a 80 million dollar payroll now and if they would of signed CC to that ridiculous contract, they are handcuffed. Sure their new payroll is over 100 million but now they can't add any other parts to their team. They cant supplement CC with an AJ Burnett and Mark Teixiera. What if CC goes down next year with a Tommy John? The Brewers don't have the kind of money or assets to absorb that kind of hit and not get that ROI.
Let's say the Royals signed Holliday this year to a 125 million dollar contract. What does that do? They still have needs at bullpen, catcher, shortstop, centerfield, but now have to other payroll flexability.
That is why the Yankees can buy championships and can go grab every free agent and where the smaller market teams cannot compete.
Posted by: Trusting the Process | November 10, 2009 at 10:46 AM
The Yankees are able to assemble an entire roster of high priced free agents while the other 2/3 of the league can supplement their team with some free agents and rely on cost effective young talent to win.
Can you imagine how the Phillies or Angels roster would look with 50-80M more money to spend? It would be insane.
Spending the most money doesn't automatically equal a championship, but it sure does help.
Posted by: bigpat | November 10, 2009 at 10:52 AM
"200 mil??!?!?! That is insane just to think about. As good as he is at that price I don't think I would want him if I were a Yankee fan."
For one of the best pitchers in the game who will only be 25 when he hits FA, $200 million isn't unreasonable at all. I mean, they could sign him for 10 years and he'd only be 35 when the contract was up. Of course, serious trouble if there's any kind of injury, but it's a risk that several teams might well be willing to take with that quality of pitcher that young.
Posted by: Graham | November 10, 2009 at 11:00 AM
"Dylan Hernandez of the LA Times suggests that free agent pitcher Jason Marquis may be out of the Dodgers' price range."
I kind of doubt there are any free agent pitchers that are IN the Dodgers' price range.
Posted by: A | November 10, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Since the Yankees are "buying championships" and are having trouble filling the seats, what is the over-under on YES becoming pay per view for Yankee games?
Posted by: A | November 10, 2009 at 11:04 AM
I understand the grief that other people may have about the Yankees having a more financial advantage compared to other teams.. but isnt more about spending your money wisely? I fail to see with only 5 free agents on this world championship team that they bought the championship?
Posted by: NYY1987 | November 10, 2009 at 11:06 AM
Pathetic to even think a back-end of the rotation guy like Jason Marquis is out of the DODGERS' price range. Out of the Royals' price range? Sure, but yeesh, this is LA.
Posted by: vtadave | November 10, 2009 at 11:13 AM
"I fail to see with only 5 free agents on this world championship team that they bought the championship?"
-NYY1987
What you are failing to see is that the Yankees signed major FA (lets just name a few that had a huge impact: Tex, CC, AJ, Damon, Godzila) but AS WELL had the resources to lock up their own players (Jeter, AROD, Rivera, Cano, Posada)
If another team goes out and signs Tex, CC, and AJ they wont be able to keep their own guys. So its the combination of other team's stars with the Yankee stars that don't leave until they become inneffective.
Posted by: bbxxj | November 10, 2009 at 11:18 AM
"One GM asked Joel Sherman of the New York Post why Felix Hernandez would consider signing long-term with the Mariners when the Yankees could conceivably offer $200MM in two winters when he's a free agent."
It's because some players still want to keep their SOUL! Eff the Yankees! Keep yer mitts off our ace!
Posted by: willardthegreat | November 10, 2009 at 11:27 AM
When Jordan played for Bulls, they were virtually unbeatable. When someone did beat them, (even though he was wearing number 45 when it happened), it was sweet.
That dynasty has gone away, and in 4 years the Yankees are going to have some aging, injured and inconsistent guys tying up 100m in payroll. They're also going to have a SS making 15M per year who should be a 3B, but blocked by another former SS who is now at 3B.
It all goes around, and when the Yanks are feeling the pain, which at some point, they will....it will be sweet, but in the meanwhile, all other teams can do is operate as a business and try to put the best product on the field that their resources allow.
So be it.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 10, 2009 at 11:30 AM
Well good news is Twins are trying to work out a long term deal with Mauer so sorry yankees, and I honestly think Felix will be one of the best pitchers our generation will ever see, hes still 23 and just won 19 games on a team that was less than steller
Posted by: Chicagostat21 | November 10, 2009 at 11:31 AM
The Yankees money isn't about the stadium or hot dogs or anything else that you actually pay for. The money is in the Yes network. It's a cash printing machine.
You simply cannot, in any way, compare the Yankees to ANY OTHER team in baseball. They have the highest paid players in the entire game at C, 1B, SS, 3B, SP, and CL. They have incredibly well paid players at LF, DH, SP (Burnett), and RP.
And for those whining about the owners of other teams not spending please get a clue. Try a little economics 101. Every team trails the Yankees in REVENUES. Even with luxury taxes and revenue sharing it's still not even close. The Yankees can spend like crazy and still make a profit (even if the team isn't successful). There is no situation where a team like the Royals could have a $200m payroll and still make a profit.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM
As for Felix - $200m is a lot of money. 10 years is a really long time. Go check your history books regarding long-term contracts with pitchers. I think you will find that NOT ONE OF THEM have worked out. The probability of a pitcher suffering a catastrophic injury is extremely high (compared to a positional player).
If I were Felix and had a 8/150 deal on the table now I would take it. Maybe build in an out clause at year 5. Sure he could potentially be leaving money on the table but Felix is far from a sure thing.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 10, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Bjguess hit the nail on the head.
Posted by: TheAntiRecruiter | November 10, 2009 at 11:42 AM
NEWS FLASH: The Yanks have won 1 WS ring in the last 9 years and the world has not come to an end.
If the Yanks had lost to the Phillies then there wouldn't be the outcry. We win and the world is topsy turvy and people want Bud Selig's head on a spike.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 10, 2009 at 11:44 AM
I won't bother feeding into the "Yanks are bad for baseball and baseball is unwatchable because of the Yanks". However, for all those willing to research the facts AND understand the true meaning of the word parity, or at least how it relates to sports, there's far more of it (parity) in the MLB than there is in the NFL and NBA.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 10, 2009 at 11:46 AM
bbxxj i am not arguing the fact the yankees have more money to spend than other teams.. thats just a plain fact. they have the flexibility to do so do to the profits the yankees make. What i am stating is its hard to argue that they have bought their championship when the point of the game (under the current rules) is to build a winning team. A lot of other teams can do what the yankees do but choose not to.
If the twins, rays, marlins can compete why cant the pirates and royals do it? its spending the money wisely is what does it in my opinion. The yankees have an advantage yes, and when they see someone who can help the team they go all out for that player. Teams like the royals or pirates yes may make a play at a big free agent at times but mostly its the wrong player for the team and they can not afford to make mistakes... thy seem to draft poorly and make horrible business choices..
lets look at some of the larger market teams. the (mets)second (cubs)third (tigers)fifth (astros)eighth and (mariners)tenth highest payrolls failed to make the playoffs.. because of poor spending not because they dont have the money to compete.
The yankees are going to be locked into some backended heavy contracts in a couple years but almost certainly will add new free agents that will start this whole conversation over again. Its the way they run the business and over the last couple years have done a good job at it. Retain your own star players, add position guys, and add big stars when available.
I have to agree with what someone said earlier a salary cap would not change anything but run some of the smaller teams into the ground because there would have to be a salary floor as well. And also whoever thinks the Yankees winning a Championship is bad for baseball is either an upset fan or just plain stupid. Its good for ratings, attendance, interest, and profits due to well the Yankees either being your favorite team or you just plain hating them!
Posted by: NYY1987 | November 10, 2009 at 11:53 AM
I truly am not convinced that the Yanks will want to committ that kind of money to Felix, and am not sure it would be wise to do so for Mauer. CC was done out of clear desperation. W/o him it would be back to Wang, Pettite and others. GOing into the new stadium it was clear that with $70-$80 mil coming off the books, they HAD to fork over whatever it took to sign CC and AJ. If CC stays on board, AJ stays healthy and if Joba or Hughes can mature into TOR guys then I think it's less of a need for the Yanks to sign another mega-million dollar deal for a guy like Felix. Hopefully, 2010 will be a great year for young Yankee pitchers like McAllister, Betances, Brackman, Phelps, Banuelos, Mitchell, Nova, Noesi, Warren, Heredia and Vizcaino. If the "core four" of the future (CC, AJ, Joba and Hughes) can do what they're capable of and the minor league arms develop then there may be less of a need for Felix. And if the Yanks sign one of the big three next winter (Halladay, Lee or Beckett) then that all but kills the idea of Felix I would think.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 10, 2009 at 11:56 AM
What's funny is that Carl Pohland was worth about $3 billion. Georgie's worth about $1.3 billion. With the Twins headed into a new stadium it will be interesting to see if the Twins FO is allowed to sign a couple of meaningfull FA this winter
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 10, 2009 at 11:59 AM
"One GM asked Joel Sherman of the New York Post why Felix Hernandez would consider signing long-term with the Mariners when the Yankees could conceivably offer $200MM in two winters when he's a free agent."
=================================
1. He most likely could get a 100+ million dollar deal RIGHT NOW and then be a free agent again when he is ~30 setting him up for another huge payday.
2. He could very well get injured or, god forbid, not have as good of seasons in 2010 and 2011 making his payday MUCH smaller when he hits the market.
3. If he waits til his 26 year old season to sign that mythical 200 million dollar contract that may or probably doesn't exist it will take him later into his 30s where he potential contract after that will be less.
It makes all the sense in the world for Felix to take a big contract now then he will have a shot a getting another 6 or 7 year deal when that one would end.
Posted by: thr33niL | November 10, 2009 at 12:02 PM
I agree YFS78 i just dont see it happening unless something big happens as well. Hopefully next year is a good year for the minor league arms. Im excited for Banuelos most of all kid has something there. Hopefully Betances/Brackman step up this coming year. Yankees farm system hasnt been this pitcher exciting since i can remember lol
Posted by: NYY1987 | November 10, 2009 at 12:04 PM
I couldve sworn i read a few years ago that the yankees were in the red and werent making a profit at one point, yet they were still spending.
Economics 101 also tells you that if the Tigers are worth 100 million less than the Cardinals, there is no excuse why the Cardinals payroll is nearly 30 million LESS.
Stop blaming the Yankees for something you'd enjoy if it were ur team doing.
I dont like it, but theres no reason why more teams cant have bigger payrolls. Why are the Orioles spending nearly half the money the Tigers are, but are worth more?
Posted by: Moses Magnum | November 10, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Can't sign Marquis? Not exactly a bad thing..
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | November 10, 2009 at 12:25 PM
"•One GM asked Joel Sherman of the New York Post why Felix Hernandez would consider signing long-term with the Mariners when the Yankees could conceivably offer $200MM in two winters when he's a free agent."
------------------------------------------------------
Dear...god.
A legit salary cap need's to be put into place. I'm not saying they "buy championships", i'm just saying the system must be fixed, so one team can't go around hogging all the talent. Of course some teams don't deserve to be saved, due to the awful way it was ran, but some team's just don't have the money to compete.
But what should the cap be set at?
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | November 10, 2009 at 12:29 PM
I can't imagine the salary cap being less than $150. That really only effects the Yanks. The problem I foresee is that any salary cap will come w/ a salary floor. The NBA and NFL models have a floor which is about 80-85% percent of the cap. Let's forget that and say it's 65% or about $100 mil. With teams like the Rays and Marlins simply unable to draw over 2 million even when they field competitve teams, how in the world will they be able to handle a $100 mil payroll. And should the other mlb teams (primarily the major markets) be forced to support a team who simply may not be a viable franchize? Do you restrict the amount of teams and do away with those not even close to turning profits despite having low payrolls AND getting millions from revenue sharing OR do you move those teams into other markets that might be able to support a team?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 10, 2009 at 12:45 PM
personally after what happened last year i think a salary cap or something along those lines is gonna happen in the next deal it gonna be big to i think the luxury tax will help those that need help paying for the floor bud wants competitve balance dont be surprised when it happens 150 is max some of you who act like your part of the team is just sad i understand you like them but its not like you win anything of value thats the life of a fan of any sport but saying we should do this its not gonna work cuz fans dont work for any mlb team have a nice day
Posted by: Rays Fan 33 | November 10, 2009 at 01:07 PM
Many baseball owners have greater personal wealth than the Steinbrenner family. Its not just about the owner, it's also about the size of the market and, the income that is generated from non-ticket sources.
The Yankees enjoy a huge advantage in income from local radio and TV rights. And because they are in New York, they are able to easily charge significantly more for boxes because of the number of corporate sponsors they can choose from.
Just because they are the Yankees - arguably the most famous professional sports team in the world - they enjoy a certain status and merchandising power that other teams cannot match.
A rich owner who is willing to spend a lot of his own money helps but without the organizational income, even a very rich owner can only do so much.
Since the players union is unlikely to accept any salary cap, I think that full sharing of all radio and TV and merchandising income would help even the playing field.
Posted by: bernie | November 10, 2009 at 01:31 PM
The fact that Aroldis Chapman wears makeup is disturbing to me. Does anyone know what happened with Miguel Angel Sano??
Posted by: TargetField2010 | November 10, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Agreed, Yanksfan.
I was hoping someone I respect on here would pick that one up.
As for the and/or, I say moving a team would be better than dissolving it. Either way, fan's are going to be pissed, but at least you don't have to worry about not gaining more fan's while losing some. But, you have to worry about the ensuing cost's of building a new fanbase and stadium. Not to mention all the other cost's incurred while pulling off such a move.
No doubt it will be an epic undertaking, but I feel it must happen.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | November 10, 2009 at 02:20 PM
It's funny how people, including me, are complaining about how the Yankees are buying championships, when in reality you have to ask yourself "Would I be complaining if the (place favorite team's name here) were buying championships? Or would I just say 'Hey we're doing it so it must be okay!'".
Best part is that's coming from a devoted Red Sox fan.
Posted by: bosox15 | November 10, 2009 at 07:05 PM
How long would 200mm lock Felix Hernandez up for?
I would love to see him as a Yank - then he would have national coverage and people would realize how good he is. Just like big Tex.
I bet the Yanks get Doc Halladay for two years and then pick up Felix when the Mariners management no longer want his big contract.
Posted by: mjr234nyu | November 11, 2009 at 03:30 PM
Broson Arroyo put the Yankees in perspective:
If you offered baseball owners a lossing season but they would make $10mm a year or they could win the world series and loss $10mm - there is only 1 owner who would take the championship and the monetary loss - George Steinbrenner.
God bless George Steinbrenner.
PS money does not equal championships - look at the NY Mets. (2009 JINX)
Posted by: mjr234nyu | November 11, 2009 at 03:33 PM
How long would 200mm lock Felix Hernandez up for?
I would love to see him as a Yank - then he would have national coverage and people would realize how good he is. Just like big Tex.
I bet the Yanks get Doc Halladay for two years and then pick up Felix when the Mariners management no longer want his big contract.
Posted by: mjr234nyu | November 11, 2009 at 03:30 PM
___
Oh yes, and they'll get Mauer. And they'll get Holliday. And they'll get Pujols. And they'll get every single good player in the majors. Yankees fans never cease to amaze me.
Posted by: SoxFan2009 | November 11, 2009 at 06:04 PM
It's funny how people, including me, are complaining about how the Yankees are buying championships, when in reality you have to ask yourself "Would I be complaining if the (place favorite team's name here) were buying championships? Or would I just say 'Hey we're doing it so it must be okay!'".
Best part is that's coming from a devoted Red Sox fan.
Posted by: bosox15 | November 10, 2009 at 07:05 PM
___
Good point. What humors me more is how the Yankees and their fans were talking about "building a championship" after the Sox won in 2007. How the Yankees were going to change their ways. They were going to do it with their own guys.
Then, they sign Sabathia, Burnett, and Teixiera, win a championship, now they are willing to sign any major league player to a astronomically high contract once again.
Posted by: SoxFan2009 | November 11, 2009 at 06:09 PM